This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/082,438 filed on Nov. 18, 2013, titled “FRONT RAIL MOUNTED AIRBAG” and U.S. application Ser. No. 14/082,455 filed on Nov. 18, 2013, titled “FLEXIBLE OPTICAL IMPACT DETECTION SENSOR FOR FRONT RAIL MOUNTED AIRBAG,” the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention generally relates to an airbag for a motor vehicle to minimize intrusion into the vehicle during an impact event, specifically a front side rail airbag that is triggered to inflate in the event of and to mitigate small offset rigid barrier impacts.
Airbag systems for use in motor vehicles are generally well-known in the art.
Traditionally, such airbag systems have been used within motor vehicle interiors to mitigate and reduce occupant impacts with motor vehicle interior components and structures, such as steering wheels, dashboards, knee bolsters, side door panels, and body pillars,
The present disclosure, however, addresses the application of such airbag systems in combination with exterior motor vehicle components to manage and control motor vehicle impact events with external objects. In particular, the airbag system is adapted to manage and control an impact event to the front corner of the motor vehicle. That is, various testing protocols and standards are being and have been developed to address vehicle integrity in the event of such a collision. For example, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has adopted a new small offset frontal crash test, where the test objective is to manage and control damage and injuries resulting from actual motor vehicle impacts with stationary rigid poles (offset from the motor vehicle center of gravity and outside the main longitudinal vehicle to vehicle collinear offset impacts (again, offset from the motor vehicle center of gravity), and vehicle to vehicle frontal oblique impacts. The IIHS test protocol involves the evaluation of such impacts against a rigid pole and currently envisions using a 25 percent overlap rigid barrier with a curved end simulating a 6-inch pole radius. The test impact velocity is 40 mph (64 kilometers per hour). The contemplated testing protocol is referred herein as the 40 mph Small Offset Rigid Barrier (“SORB”) impact test.
In view of the SORB test protocol, current front end structures are being evaluated to optimize vehicle performance in small offset pole impact events. Hence, solutions for mitigating SORB impacts would be advantageous.
The airbag, assembly disclosed herein particularly accomplishes the foregoing optimization of vehicle performance by providing a deployable structure mounted to the front side rail of the vehicle behind the bumper. Upon vehicle impact with the SORB, a front bumper mounted sensor sends a signal to an electronic control unit or ECU. Once the signal is processed, the ECU activates a side rail mounted inflator deploying the airbag. The airbag design is configured such that the airbag will deploy in a triangular shape, preferably creating a 30 degree angle with the longitudinal axis of the side rail and the motor vehicle. The 30 degree angular end of the triangular deployed airbag is preferably closest to the front bumper system of the vehicle. This deployment configuration allows for the vehicle to generate a very high Y-force against the rigid barrier to propel the vehicle away from the barrier and thus redirect impact energy by lateral movement of the motor vehicle and thereby minimize vehicle intrusion.
According to one aspect of the present disclosure, an airbag system is disclosed that mitigates intrusion in the event of an offset rigid barrier impact to a forward corner of a motor vehicle. The airbag system comprises a motor vehicle front rail having a forward projecting distal end and an airbag attached proximate the distal end of the front rail, the airbag having a stowed condition and an inflated condition, wherein the airbag in the inflated condition has an inclined angular leading edge. An inflator is operationally coupled with the airbag and is responsive to electrical actuation for inflating the airbag with a gas. An impact detection sensor generates a signal upon an impact event, whereby a controller processes the signal generated by the detection sensor and electrically actuates the inflator upon computing a predetermined impact severity to the forward corner of the motor vehicle. The inclined angular leading edge of the airbag in the inflated condition acts against the offset rigid barrier so as to generate a lateral force against the offset rigid barrier to push the motor vehicle away from the barrier and thereby redirect impact energy by lateral movement of the motor vehicle.
Still another aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system having a pair of airbags, wherein one of the pair of airbags is mounted on each side of the motor vehicle.
Yet another aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag, system wherein the motor vehicle has a front wheel mounted proximate the front rail, and the airbag is mounted forward of the front wheel.
An additional aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system wherein the motor vehicle includes a body panel having an exterior and an interior surface, the airbag being disposed proximate the interior surface to act through the body panel to generate the lateral force against the offset rigid barrier.
Another aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system utilizing an airbag having a substantially triangular configuration when in the inflated condition, where an angular leading edge corresponds to the hypotenuse of the triangular configuration, a forward end of the airbag corresponds to the apex of the triangular configuration, and a rearward end corresponds to the base of the triangular configuration.
Still another aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system where the apex of the triangular configuration has an angle of about 30 degrees,
A further aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system, wherein the motor vehicle is equipped with an automatic occupant restraint system having occupant restraint system deployment sensor, and the impact detection sensor is also the deployment sensor for the automatic occupant restraint system.
Yet a further aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system having an impact detection sensor mounted to an interior surface of the outboard portion of the front bumper.
An additional aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system having an impact detection sensor that detects bending of the outboard portion of the front bumper during the impact event.
Yet another aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system having an impact detection sensor comprised of a conductive film that generates an electrical signal when bent.
A still further aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system having an impact detection sensor comprising a fiber optic cable that generates a variable output signal in response to bending of the fiber optic cable.
Another aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system for a motor vehicle comprising a front rail, an airbag attached to the front rail, the airbag when inflated having an angular leading edge, an inflator, a sensor for generating a signal upon an impact to the corner of the vehicle by an object, and a controller for receiving the signal from the sensor and actuating the inflator, wherein the angular leading edge of the airbag generates a lateral force against the object.
A yet additional aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system utilizing a front rail having a distal end and an outer side surface, wherein the airbag is attached to the distal end of the front rail on the outer side surface of the front rail.
A further aspect of the present disclosure is an airbag system utilizing a pair of front rails extending forward from each side of the motor vehicle, with one each of a pair of the airbags is mounted on each of the outer side surfaces thereof.
Still another aspect of the present disclosure is a method of employing an airbag system to generate a lateral force against an offset rigid barrier to push the motor vehicle away from the barrier and thereby redirect impact energy by lateral movement of the motor vehicle, wherein the method comprises the steps of providing a motor vehicle front rail having a forward projecting distal end, attaching an airbag proximate the distal end of the front rail, the airbag having a stowed condition and an inflated condition, wherein the airbag in the inflated condition creates an inclined angular leading edge, equipping the airbag with an inflator operationally coupled with the airbag responsive to electrical actuation for inflating the airbag with a gas, providing an impact detection sensor for generating a signal upon an impact event, and providing a controller for processing the signal generated by the detection sensor, electrically actuating the inflator upon a predetermined impact severity to the forward corner of the motor vehicle, and presenting the inclined angular leading edge of the airbag in the inflated condition to act against the offset rigid barrier so as to generate a lateral force against the offset rigid barrier to push the motor vehicle away from the barrier and thereby redirect impact energy by lateral movement of the motor vehicle.
Yet another aspect of the present disclosure is a method wherein the airbag has a substantially triangular configuration when in the inflated condition, wherein the angular leading edge corresponds to the hypotenuse of the triangular configuration, a forward end of the airbag corresponds to the apex of the triangular configuration having an angle of about 30 degrees, and a rearward end corresponds to the base of the triangular configuration.
These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present disclosure will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art upon studying the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
In the drawings:
a is another perspective view of the first embodiment of the bumper bending impact sensor for use with the airbag system of the present disclosure;
b is yet another perspective view of the first embodiment of the bumper bending impact sensor for use with the airbag system of the present disclosure;
For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “right,” “left,” “rear,” “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in
Referring to
The bumper assembly 26 can adopt one of many possible configurations, but, as is typical, preferably includes a steel reinforcement beam 30 to which is attached an outer body fascia 32 having a decorative finish and color coordinated to the overall exterior color of the motor vehicle 10. The attachment of the bumper assembly 26 to the front rail 16 can also include a tow speed (i.e., 5-9 mph) impact mitigator 154, such as a polygel mitigator having a displaceable ram and tube assembly capable of absorbing impact energy from a low speed impact without damage to the distal end 22 of the front rails 16 and minimal damage to the outer body fascia 32, as shown in
The front rails 16, as well as other front body structures and engine components (in the case of front mounted engine motor vehicles) provide a deformable forward section 34 (which may also be used for impact mitigation), as is known in the art. It is contemplated and intended that the forward section 34 will deform upon contact with an object in a forward collision, such as in the aforementioned NCAP testing, to absorb the impact energy associated with such a forward collision. As is common on such systems, one or more accelerometers is used as a. sensing device to generate an electrical signal upon the sudden de-acceleration of a frontal impact. This signal is then detected by an on-board electronic control unit or ECU 60 and then used to determine whether the installed occupant restraint system, such as one or more airbag assemblies, should be deployed within the occupant compartment in the event that a predetermined de-acceleration is detected.
A further optimization of vehicle structural performance for SORB impacts can be obtained by providing a front rail mounted airbag system 35 to mitigate intrusion in a 40 mph SORB impact. An airbag 36 is mounted in the stowed condition to an outer surface 38 of the “crash can” or deformable segment 156 of the distal end 22 of the front side rail 16, as best seen in
Upon vehicle impact with the SORB barrier 56, a sensor 58 sends a signal to an electronic control unit or ECU 60. Once the signal is processed, the ECU 60 activates an inflator 62 operationally coupled with the front side rail mounted airbag 36, deploying the front side rail mounted airbag 36. The airbag 36 is preferably configured such that the airbag 36 will deploy in a substantially triangular configuration when in the inflated condition, thereby creating an angular leading edge 64 corresponding to the hypotenuse of the triangular configuration, a forward end 66 of the airbag corresponding to the apex of the triangular configuration and preferably having an angle of about 30degrees, and a rearward end 68 corresponding to the base of the triangular configuration. This deployment configuration allows for the vehicle to generate a very high lateral or Y-force against the SORB barrier 56 to propel the motor vehicle 10 laterally away from the SORB barrier 56 and thus redirect impact energy by lateral movement of the motor vehicle 10 and thereby minimize vehicle intrusion, as best shown in
As shown in
As noted previously, accelerometers may be used as a sensing device to generate an electrical signal upon the sudden de-acceleration of a frontal impact to deploy airbag(s) within the occupant compartment in the event that a predetermined de-acceleration is detected. These accelerometers may also be employed to signal a vehicle impact with the SORB. However, under certain circumstances, such as small overlap frontal impacts, the time taken by the traditional frontal impact sensing systems may not be ideal and may not provide adequate time for proper deployment of the disclosed airbag structure. These kinds of impacts may need additional sensing systems especially designed for sensing small overlap frontal impacts, depending on vehicle front structure, impact velocity, and the object with which the impact occurs.
Thus, preferably a separate front bumper mounted sensor 58 is used to send a signal to the ECU 60 (such as that shown in
The first concept, a flexible electro-resistive sensor 74, is a flexible sensor design which monitors for bending of the bumper reinforcing beam 30 located behind the front fascia 32. The flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 includes a force-resistive film 78, which consists of a conductive ink 80 printed on a clear plastic membrane 82. The conductive ink 80 changes resistance in response to material stress experienced when the membrane 82 bends. By applying a voltage and measuring the change, the amount of bending in the flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 can be measured, as shown in
The flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 is mounted to a rear surface 31 of the outboard portion 33 of the frontal bumper beam 30, forward of the front frame side rail 16, to detect a small offset impact event that initially causes bending only in the outboard portion 33 of the front bumper beam 30. Such bending occurs only when impacting an object of sufficient mass to deflect the sheet metal bumper beam 30 and is not subject to localized, short duration impacts which are large y resonant and does not result in significant displacement in the bumper beam 30. This improves the discrimination capabilities of the flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 versus an accelerometer, which is subject to oscillatory signals from vibrations. To provide a timely decision signal, the flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 is preferably mounted directly to a rear surface 31 of the outboard portion 33 of the front bumper beam 30, as shown in
In order for a flexible membrane sensor to function and survive in this environment, the force-resistive film sensor preferably employs a conductive ink 80 that retains its electrical properties at high temperatures (i.e., above 100° C.). The flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 is also preferably coated with a waterproof, but flexible, coating 86 to protect the ink 80 from water and salt spray, as shown in
In addition, the flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 may be bonded to the metal of the bumper beam 30 with an adhesive, no the entire length of the flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 is fixed and must expand and contract along with the bumper. However, the different thermal expansion coefficients of the force-resistive film sensor ink 80 and membrane 82 and the sheet metal of the front bumper beam 30 to which it is mounted induces an inherent drift in the signal with temperature changes, which can be significant when compared to the output of the flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 when bent. To minimize such drift, the flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 is preferably mounted at fixed points along its length. These could be wire clamps 88 attached to the flexible electro-resistive sensor 74 or built into the protective coating 86, as shown in
Alternatively, a flexible fiber optic sensor 76 may be used to detect an SORB impact. The flexible fiber optic sensor 76 consists of a fiber optic cable 92, light source 94, photodiode 96, and amplifier 98, as shown in
The flexible fiber optic cable 92 consists of a core material 100 surrounded by a thin layer of cladding material 102 having a different index of refraction than that of the core material 100. Normally, any light that bounces off the walls 104 of the core material 100 is reflected back into the core material 100 and no light is lost due to bending of the cable. However, if a partial portion of the cladding is removed to form a bare portion 106 on the core material 100, as shown in
As noted above, in the SORB test mode, the impact is preferably detected within 5 milliseconds of initial contact in order to provide timely activation of the front side rail airbag 36. By carefully placing the fiber optic cable 92 in the area of interest and modifying the cladding 102 to produce bare portions 106 in a defined pattern, the flexible optical sensor 76 can be adapted to provide a signal to specifically detect the SORB crash mode. As shown in
The detection of the specific SORB impact mode of interest is obtained by comparing the detected tight intensity signal to a predetermined tight intensity signal corresponding to an impact severity justifying airbag deployment and deployment of the airbag when the detected light signal equals or exceeds the predetermined light intensity signal. The section of the fiber optic cable 92 mounted to the front rail 16 has no cladding removed, since the deformation of the front rail 16 will occur too late in the event to be of use for activating front side rail airbag system 35. Using this selective cladding removal technique, a single length of fiber optic cable 92 can be designed to perform timely flex sensing in a specific orientation and direction. The optical cable sensor can be bonded to a rear surface of the front bumper beam with an adhesive along substantially the entire length of the sensor in contact with the bumper and the front rail. The optical fiber sensor can also be mounted to the rear of the front bumper beam and the distal portion of the front rail at fixed points along its length by wire clamps 88 attached to the sensor as shown in
The SORB front rail mounted airbag system 35 disclosed herein is lightweight, requires minimum packaging, and utilizes well-proven inflator technology. Further, the disclosed SORB front rail mounted airbag system 35 does not interfere with efforts to optimize motor vehicle performance of the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) 35 mph full frontal crash mode. That is, the disclosed SORB front rail mounted airbag system 35 may be deployed in all cases when a frontal crash component may exist (e.g., full frontal, offset frontal and angular impacts). While the SORB impact event may be sensed by the traditional front crash sensors for restraint deployment in frontal crashes, separate front bumper reinforcement beam-mounted sensors 58 provided improved performance.
It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3610657 | Cole | Oct 1971 | A |
3822076 | Mercier et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3905015 | Inose et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4176858 | Kornhauser | Dec 1979 | A |
4290627 | Cumming et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4360223 | Kirchoff | Nov 1982 | A |
4518183 | Lee | May 1985 | A |
4988862 | Beltz | Jan 1991 | A |
5022675 | Zelenak, Jr. et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5064299 | Hirschmann et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5513877 | MacBrien et al. | May 1996 | A |
5564734 | Stuckle | Oct 1996 | A |
5810427 | Hartmann et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6009970 | Breed | Jan 2000 | A |
6106038 | Dreher | Aug 2000 | A |
6279944 | Wipasuramonton et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6334639 | Vives et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6561301 | Hattori et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6623054 | Palmquist | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637788 | Zollner et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6728613 | Ishizaki et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6851706 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6923483 | Curry et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942261 | Larsen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7000725 | Sato et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7024293 | Ishizaki et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036844 | Hammer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7073619 | Alexander et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7150495 | Fayt et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7185728 | Makita et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7415337 | Hau et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7416043 | Pipkorn et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7424179 | Ohtaka et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7445073 | Munch et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7541917 | Hosokawa | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7597171 | Bauer | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7753159 | Kim et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7784817 | Choi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7806221 | Mishra | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819218 | Eichberger et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7845455 | Kim et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7885491 | Nowsch | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7926847 | Auer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7954587 | Kisanuki et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967098 | Choi | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8002312 | Korechika et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8033356 | Kim | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8353380 | Schonberger et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8398154 | Nusier et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8544589 | Rupp et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8662237 | Chung et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8672078 | Lee et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8827356 | Baccouche et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9127968 | Cuddihy | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20030020289 | Dohrmann et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030156036 | Stuetzler | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050021192 | Takafuji et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050269805 | Kalliske et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060087132 | Tanabe | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060145459 | Sendelbach et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070057490 | Deflorimonte | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070115104 | Suzuki et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070164574 | Tanabe | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198155 | Danisch | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070273165 | Beck et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080122599 | Suzuki et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080164986 | Takafuji | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080307888 | Yoshioka et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001759 | Kondo | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090102167 | Kitte et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090218798 | Garner | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100133795 | Fukuda et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110012328 | Ewing et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110307214 | Saitou et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120139216 | Scott et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120144935 | Murayama et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130278013 | Baccouche et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140097604 | Chung et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150142271 | Cuddihy | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4114016 | Nov 1992 | DE |
102004027614 | Dec 2005 | DE |
102006021662 | Nov 2007 | DE |
202009008753 | Nov 2010 | DE |
0775613 | May 1997 | EP |
2006321430 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2009210428 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2011218857 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2013220766 | Oct 2013 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Nakamura et al., Ultrasonic sensor apparatus mounted to bumper of vehicle, has protrusion portion that protrudes on outer side of sensor portion when sensor portion is mounted to bumper in horizontal direction, and bind portion binds wire, Sep. 17, 2009, JPO, JP 2009-210428 A, English Abstract. |
Nakamura et al., Ultrasonic sensor apparatus mounted to bumper of vehicle, has protrusion portion that protrudes on outer side of sensor portion when sensor portion is mounted to bumper in horizontal direction, and bind portion binds wire, Sep. 17, 2009, JPO, JP 2009-210428 A, Machine Translation of Description. |
Moditech Rescue Solutions BV, http://www.moditech.com/rescue/index3.php?action=safety—systems&page=airbag (Sep. 9, 2013). |
Flexpoint Flexible Sensor Systems, http://www.flexpoint.com/technicalDataSheets/FlexpointBrochure1.pdf (1999). |
Siemens Restraint Systems GmbH, “Development and Performance of Contact Sensors for Active Pedestrian Protection Systems” (undated). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150137494 A1 | May 2015 | US |