This invention relates to flexible electronic circuits and displays. More specifically, this invention relates to such circuits and displays using electro-optic media. This invention also relates to production of electro-optic displays on curved surfaces; these surfaces may be curved in one or both dimensions. This invention is especially but not exclusively concerned with electro-optic displays using encapsulated electrophoretic media.
The term “electro-optic” as applied to a material or a display, is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a material having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, the material being changed from its first to its second display state by application of an electric field to the material. Although the optical property is typically color perceptible to the human eye, it may be another optical property, such as optical transmission, reflectance, luminescence or, in the case of displays intended for machine reading, pseudo-color in the sense of a change in reflectance of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the visible range.
The terms “bistable” and “bistability” are used herein in their conventional meaning in the art to refer to displays comprising display elements having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, and such that after any given element has been driven, by means of an addressing pulse of finite duration, to assume either its first or second display state, after the addressing pulse has terminated, that state will persist for at least several times, for example at least four times, the minimum duration of the addressing pulse required to change the state of the display element. It is shown in published U.S pat. application Ser.No. 2002/0180687 (see also the corresponding International Application Publication No. WO 02/079869) that some particle-based electrophoretic displays capable of gray scale are stable not only in their extreme black and white states but also in their intermediate gray states, and the same is true of some other types of electro-optic displays. This type of display is properly called “multi-stable” rather than bistable, although for convenience the term “bistable” may be used herein to cover both bistable and multi-stable displays.
Several types of electro-optic displays are known. One type of electro-optic display is a rotating bichromal member type as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,808,783; 5,777,782; 5,760,761; 6,054,071 6,055,091; 6,097,531; 6,128,124; 6,137,467; and 6,147,791 (although this type of display is often referred to as a “rotating bichromal ball” display, the term “rotating bichromal member” is preferred as more accurate since in some of the patents mentioned above the rotating members are not spherical). Such a display uses a large number of small bodies (typically spherical or cylindrical) which have two or more sections with differing optical characteristics, and an internal dipole. These bodies are suspended within liquid-filled vacuoles within a matrix, the vacuoles being filled with liquid so that the bodies are free to rotate. The appearance of the display is changed to applying an electric field thereto, thus rotating the bodies to various positions and varying which of the sections of the bodies is seen through a viewing surface.
Another type of electro-optic medium is an organic light emitting diode (OLED) medium is which light generation is effected by passing current through a plurality of diodes formed from an organic material.
Another type of electro-optic medium uses an electrochromic medium, for example an electrochromic medium in the form of a nanochromic film comprising an electrode formed at least in part from a semi-conducting metal oxide and a plurality of dye molecules capable of reversible color change attached to the electrode; see, for example O′Regan, B., et al., Nature 1991, 353, 737; and Wood, D., Information Display, 18(3), 24 (March 2002). See also Bach, U., et al., Adv. Mater., 2002, 14(11), 845. Nanochromic films of this type are also described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,301,038, International Application Publication No. WO 01/27690, and in copending application Ser. No. 10/249,128, filed Mar. 18, 2003 (Publication No. 2003/0214695).
Another type of electro-optic display, which has been the subject of intense research and development for a number of years, is the particle-based electrophoretic display, in which a plurality of charged particles move through a suspending fluid under the influence of an electric field. Electrophoretic displays can have attributes of good brightness and contrast, wide viewing angles, state bistability, and low power consumption when compared with liquid crystal displays. Nevertheless, problems with the long-term image quality of these displays have prevented their widespread usage. For example, particles that make up electrophoretic displays tend to settle, resulting in inadequate service-life for these displays.
Numerous patents and applications assigned to or in the names of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and E Ink Corporation have recently been published describing encapsulated electrophoretic media. Such encapsulated media comprise numerous small capsules, each of which itself comprises an internal phase containing electrophoretically-mobile particles suspended in a liquid suspension medium, and a capsule wall surrounding the internal phase. Typically, the capsules are themselves held within a polymeric binder to form a coherent layer positioned between two electrodes. Encapsulated media of this type are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,930,026; 5,961,804; 6,017,584; 6,067,185; 6,118,426; 6,120,588; 6,120,839; 6,124,851; 6,130,773; 6,130,774; 6,172,798; 6,177,921; 6,232,950; 6,249,271; 6,252,564; 6,262,706; 6,262,833; 6,300,932; 6,312,304; 6,312,971; 6,323,989; 6,327,072; 6,376,828; 6,377,387; 6,392,785; 6,392,786; 6,413,790; 6,422,687; 6,445,374; 6,445,489; 6,459,418; 6,473,072; 6,480,182; 6,498,114; 6,504,524; 6,506,438; 6,512,354; 6,515,649; 6,518,949; 6,521,489; 6,531,997; 6,535,197; 6,538,801; 6,545,291; 6,580,545; and 6,639,578; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2002/0019081; 2002/0021270; 2002/0053900; 2002/0060321; 2002/0063661; 2002/0063677; 2002/0090980; 2002/0106847; 2002/0113770; 2002/0130832; 2002/0131147; 2002/0145792; 2002/0171910; 2002/0180687; 2002/0180688; 2002/0185378; 2003/0011560; 2003/0011867; 2003/0011868; 2003/0020844; 2003/0025855; 2003/0034949; 2003/0038755; 2003/0053189; 2003/0076573; 2003/0096113; 2003/0102858; 2003/0132908; 2003/0137521; 2003/0137717; and 2003/0151702; and International Applications Publication Nos. WO 99/67678; WO 00/05704; WO 00/38000; WO 00/38001; WO 00/36560; WO 00/67110; WO 00/67327; WO 01/07961; and WO 01/08241.
Many of the aforementioned patents and applications recognize that the walls surrounding the discrete microcapsules in an encapsulated electrophoretic medium could be replaced by a continuous phase, thus producing a so-called polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display in which the electrophoretic medium comprises a plurality of discrete droplets of an electrophoretic fluid and a continuous phase of a polymeric material, and that the discrete droplets of electrophoretic fluid within such a polymer-dispersed electrophoretic display may be regarded as capsules or microcapsules even though no discrete capsule membrane is associated with each individual droplet; see for example, the aforementioned 2002/0131147. Accordingly, for purposes of the present application, such polymer-dispersed electrophoretic media are regarded as sub-species of encapsulated electrophoretic media.
An encapsulated electrophoretic display typically does not suffer from the clustering and settling failure mode of traditional electrophoretic devices and provides further advantages, such as the ability to print or coat the display on a wide variety of flexible and rigid substrates. (Use of the word “printing” is intended to include all forms of printing and coating, including, but without limitation: pre-metered coatings such as patch die coating, slot or extrusion coating, slide or cascade coating, curtain coating; roll coating such as knife over roll coating, forward and reverse roll coating; gravure coating; dip coating; spray coating; meniscus coating; spin coating; brush coating; air knife coating; silk screen printing processes; electrostatic printing processes; thermal printing processes; ink-jet printing processes; and other similar techniques.) Thus, the resulting display can be flexible. Further, because the display medium can be printed (using a variety of methods), the display itself can be made inexpensively.
A related type of electrophoretic display is a so-called “microcell electrophoretic display”. In a microcell electrophoretic display, the charged particles and the suspending fluid are not encapsulated within microcapsules but instead are retained within a plurality of cavities formed within a carrier medium, typically a polymeric film. See, for example, International Applications Publication No. WO 02/01281, and published U.S. application Ser. No. 2002/0075556, both assigned to Sipix Imaging, Inc.
As already mentioned, one major advantage of many of the electro-optic media discussed above is their ability to be printed or coated on to a wide variety of flexible and rigid substrates. The aforementioned US US2002/0019081 describes flexible encapsulated electrophoretic displays formed by coating a stainless steel (or similar metal) foil with a polymeric layer, forming thin film transistors on the polymer and then coating the transistors with the encapsulated electrophoretic medium to form an active matrix display. Other publications relating to similar displays include:
The preferred flexible displays described in these publications use a thin (75-250 μm) continuous stainless steel foil as the substrate. Steel was chosen as the transistor substrate material because of its overall performance from initial transistor processing through final operating display. High-quality, low-cost steel foils are available in high-volume, and the high-temperature and excellent dimensional stability properties of steel allow formation of thin film transistors (TFT's) without any pre-processing (for example, bake-out or thin-film capping) using conventional TFT manufacturing technologies. Through front and back-end processing, steel foil substrates exhibit excellent handling properties owing to the material's strength, flatness and conductivity (which avoids problems due to electrostatic charge accumulation on the substrate during processing).
However, stainless steel and similar metal foils do have the disadvantage that they are substantially denser than other potential substrate materials such as plastics. As a result, flexible displays using such metal substrates of the type described in the aforementioned publications will weigh more than displays formed on plastic substrates of the same thickness.
In one aspect, the present invention seeks to provide a backplane for use in an electro-optic display, this backplane using a metal substrate but being lighter in weight than the metal-based substrates described above.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to assembly of electro-optic displays, and especially encapsulated electrophoretic displays, on to surfaces which are curved in one or both dimensions. Such curved surfaces are found, for example, in watches, electric shavers, cellular telephones and various other consumer electronics products. It has been found that, if one attempts to form an encapsulated electrophoretic display on a curved surface by coating a layer of electrophoretic medium on a flat surface (as most traditional printing and similar coating processes require) and then deforming the layer of electrophoretic medium to the desired curved configuration, substantial damage to the electrophoretic medium may occur, depending upon the exact curved configuration required. Such damage may include creep, which results in non-uniform switching of the electrophoretic medium, and/or rupture of some capsules, with resultant poor electro-optic performance, including reduction in contrast ratio and operating lifetime. Similar problems may be experienced with other types of electro-optic media.
The present invention provides processes which permit the assembly of electro-optic displays on curved substrates while reducing or eliminating the aforementioned problems.
Accordingly, in one aspect this invention provides a backplane for use in an electro-optic display, the backplane comprising a patterned metal foil having a plurality of apertures extending therethrough, coated on at least side with an insulating polymeric material and having a plurality of thin film electronic devices provided on the insulating polymeric material. This aspect of the invention may hereinafter be called the “patterned metal foil backplane”.
In this backplane, the apertures may be arranged on a rectangular grid, and may occupy at least about 30 percent, and preferably at least about 60 percent, of the area of the patterned metal foil. Typically, the patterned metal foil is coated on both sides with an insulating polymeric material; it may be coated on both sides with the same insulating polymeric material, or may be coated on its two sides with different insulating polymeric materials.
In some embodiments of the invention, each of the thin film electronic devices lies entirely within the area of one aperture in the metal foil. In other embodiments, each of the thin film electronic devices extends across a plurality of apertures in the metal foil.
This invention extends to an electro-optic display comprising a backplane of the present invention, especially such an electro-optic display comprising an encapsulated electrophoretic electro-optic medium.
In another aspect, this invention provides a backplane for use in an electro-optic display, the backplane comprising a metal foil coated on at least one side with an insulating polymeric material and having a plurality of thin film electronic devices provided on the insulating polymeric material, the backplane further comprising at least one conductive via extending through the polymeric material and electrically connecting at least one of the thin film electronic devices to the metal foil. This aspect of the invention may hereinafter be called the “conductive via backplane”.
In the conductive via backplane, the metal foil serves as at least one of an antenna, an inductor loop, a power plane, a capacitor, a capacitor contact, a pixel electrode, and electromagnetic induction shielding.
This invention extends to an electro-optic display comprising a conductive via backplane of the present invention. Such an electro-optic display may be in the form of a smart card having an electro-optic display thereon, the metal foil serving to communicate between the card and a card reading apparatus.
In another aspect, this invention provides a process for driving a backplane comprising a conductive layer, an insulating layer and at least one transistor disposed on the opposed side of the insulating layer from the conductive layer, the process comprising varying the voltage applied to the gate of the transistor and thereby switching the transistor between on and off states, the process further comprising maintaining the conductive layer at a voltage different from ground and within the range of voltages applied to the source of the transistor during driving of the backplane. This aspect of the invention may hereinafter be called the “controlled voltage conductive layer”.
Typically, in this process, the voltage applied to the conductive layer satisfies the relation:
(3*Vmax+Vmin)/4>Vc>(Vmax+3*Vmin)/4
where Vmax and Vmin are respectively the maximum and minimum voltages applied to the source during driving, and Vc is the voltage applied to the conductive layer. Preferably, the voltage satisfies the relation:
(3*Vmax)+2*Vmin)/5>Vc>(2*Vmax+3*Vmin)/5
and most desirably the voltage substantially satisfies the relation:
Vc=(Vmax+Vmin)/2.
In another aspect, this invention provides a process for forming a plurality of electronic components on a polymeric material coating a metal substrate, the process comprising forming a plurality of discrete areas of polymeric material on the metal substrate and thereafter forming the plurality of electronic components on the discrete areas of polymeric material. For reasons discussed below, this aspect of the invention may hereinafter be called the “mesa process”.
In this mesa process, a continuous layer of the polymeric material may be formed on the metal substrate and thereafter this continuous layer may be divided to form the discrete areas of polymeric material. Desirably, at least some of the edges of the discrete areas of polymeric material are undercut; such undercutting of the edges of the discrete areas of polymeric material may be effected by an etching step.
In another aspect, this invention provides an electro-optic display having a metal substrate, the display having a central portion comprising an electro-optic material and means for writing an image on the electro-optic material, and a peripheral portion extending around at least part of the periphery of the central portion, the peripheral portion having a plurality of apertures extending through the metal substrate, by means of which apertures the electro-optic display may be stitched to a flexible medium. This aspect of the invention may hereinafter be called the “stitchable display”.
In such a stitchable display, the peripheral portion of the display is desirably free from the electro-optic material. The peripheral portion of the display may extend completely around the central portion so that the entire periphery of the electro-optic display can be stitched into the fabric or other flexible material.
In another aspect, this invention provides a process for forming an electro-optic display on a substrate curved in one dimension, the process comprising:
This aspect of the invention may hereinafter be called the “first 1D-curved process”. In this process, the laminate may further comprise a layer of lamination adhesive overlying the layer of electro-optic medium, and the layer of lamination adhesive is contacted with the backplane.
In another aspect, this invention provides a process for forming an electro-optic display on a substrate curved in one dimension, the process comprising:
This aspect of the invention may hereinafter be called the “second 1D-curved process”.
Finally, this invention provides a process for forming an electro-optic display on a curved backplane having at least one pixel electrode, the process comprising:
This aspect of the invention may hereinafter be called the “2D-curved process”. This process may further comprise applying an edge sealant around at least part of the edge of the display.
As indicated above, the present invention has several different aspects providing improvements in backplanes for electro-optic displays, and processes for the formation of such backplanes and displays. For ease of comprehension, the various different aspects of the invention will hereinafter be described separately, but it should be understood that a single backplane or display may make use of more than one aspect of the invention; for example, the 1D-curved processes of the invention may be carried out using a patterned metal foil backplane of the invention.
Patterned Metal Foil Backplane
As already mentioned, in one aspect this invention provides a backplane for use in an electro-optic display, this backplane comprising a patterned metal foil coated on one or both sides with an insulating polymeric material and having a plurality of thin film electronic devices provided on the insulating polymeric material. The resulting backplane is light in weight but substantially maintains the dimensional stability of a continuous metal foil.
The patterning of the metal foil used in the backplane of the present invention can vary widely depending upon the type of display into which the backplane is to be incorporated.
In contrast,
Which of the embodiments of
The patterned metal foil backplane of the present invention allows for substantial weight reduction in the backplane of an electro-optic display while maintaining the dimensional stability and structural integrity of such a backplane based on a steel or other strong metal foil. The backplane of the present invention can be manufactured inexpensively, since steel can be rolled into a pattern and polymeric materials or inorganic slurries can be wet coated or laminated in a continuous fashion. The present invention also provides manufacturing flexibility and allows use of conventional materials.
Conductive via Backplane
The benefits of using a metal foil as a substrate in the backplane of an electro-optic display are not, however, confined to mechanical support. In additional to providing mechanical support and dimensional stability during formation of electronic components, such a metal foil can be used as part of the electronic circuitry of the backplane.
Accordingly, as already mentioned, this invention provides a conductive via backplane for use in an electro-optic display, this backplane comprising a metal foil coated on one or both sides with an insulating polymeric material and having a plurality of thin film electronic devices provided on the insulating polymeric material, the backplane further comprising at least one conductive via extending through the polymeric material and electrically connecting at least one of the thin film electronic devices to the metal foil. In such a backplane, the metal foil may or may not be patterned beyond any apertures required for formation of the via(s).
A preferred process forming a conductive via backplane of the present invention is illustrated in
The last step of the process is the formation of via apertures through the polymeric material 504 and the filling of these via apertures with conductive material to form vias 510 interconnecting electronic components 506 and the patterned metal layer 502A, and optionally any additional components 508 to produce the structure shown in
During the last two steps of this process (i.e., the patterning of the foil and the formation and filling of the via apertures), it may be necessary or desirable to protect or passivate the exposed electronic components 506 in order to prevent damage thereto. Those skilled in semiconductor fabrication technology will be aware of conventional techniques for such protection and/or passivation, for example covering the electronic components 506 with a sacrificial protective or passivating layer, which can later be etched away without damage to the components themselves. It may also be necessary or desirable to attach the structure shown in
An alternative process for producing the structure shown in
The patterned metal layer 502A and associated circuitry may serve a wide variety of functions, for example antennae, inductor loops, power planes, capacitors, capacitor contacts, pixel electrodes, and electromagnetic induction shielding.
The conductive via backplane of the present invention is especially, but not exclusively, intended for use in so-called “smart cards”. In such a smart card, the electronic components on the front surface of the card (corresponding to the top surface in
The conductive via backplane of the present invention provides the advantages of improved electronic component integration and reduced cost by using the reverse side of a substrate, thus providing more compact (thinner) packaging. Such improved integration is especially useful in smart and credit cards, and in electronic label applications.
Controlled Voltage Conductive Layer
As already indicated, a third aspect of the invention relates to controlling the voltage applied to a backplane containing a conductive layer, an insulating layer and at least one transistor disposed on the opposed side of the insulating layer from the conductive layer, the backplane further being provided with means for varying the voltage applied to the gate of the transistor and thereby switching the transistor between on (conductive) and off (non-conductive) states. According to this aspect of the present invention, the conductive layer is maintained at a voltage different from ground and within the range of voltages applied to the source of the transistor during scanning of the display. If the maximum and minimum voltages applied to the source during scanning are Vmax and Vmin respectively, and the voltage applied to the conductive layer is Vc, then desirably these voltages should satisfy the relation:
(3*Vmax+Vmin)/4>Vc>(Vmax+3*Vmin)/4,
most desirably should satisfy the relation:
(3*Vmax)+2*Vmin)/5>Vc>(2*Vmax+3*Vmin)/5,
and optimally should substantially satisfy the relation:
Vc=(Vmax+Vmin)/2.
The major proportion of the power consumption of most electro-optic displays is accounted by a series of capacitative switching terms of the form:
P=0.5CV2f
where C is the relevant capacitance, V is the voltage difference across the capacitative load and f is the driving frequency. Separate terms of this type occur for source line capacitance, gate line capacitance and pixel capacitance. However, typically the source line capacitance (column electrode capacitance, assuming the conventional allocation of gate lines to rows, source lines to columns and drain lines to pixel electrodes) dominates the power consumption of the display. As an example, for a SVGA (800×600) active matrix display scanned at a frame rate of 60 Hz, the source line is modulated at 28.8 MHz, the gate line at 36 kHz, and the pixel at 60 Hz, or to put it another way, in such a display every time a new line of the display is to be written, only one row electrode has to switched from high to low and one from low to high, whereas all 800 column electrodes have to be switched between random values depending upon the value of each pixel in the image being written.
The transistor shown in
The gate voltage is typically 5 V in the off state of the transistor and 30 V in the on state, while the source voltage typically varies between 0 V and 20 V with the transparent common electrode set to approximately 10 V.
From what has been said above, it will be apparent that one major factor affecting the power consumption of the display is the energy loss due to the capacitance between the source electrode 612 and the metal foil 602; if, as is commonly the case, the thickness of the polymeric material 604 is less than or of the same order as the widths of the row and column electrodes and/or the pixel electrodes, the power consumption caused by this capacitative loss can be substantial. Since, as already mentioned, this energy loss is proportional to the square of the difference in voltage between the source line voltage and the voltage of the metal foil 602, and since the source line voltages can reasonably be assumed to be randomly distributed within the operating range, if the metal foil is simply allowed to float at or near ground potential, the average difference in voltage will be substantial and so will be the energy loss. To minimize the energy loss, the metal foil 602 should be maintained at or close to the middle of the range of source line voltages, which in this case is 10V. This may conveniently be done by tying the metal foil 602 to the voltage of the common front electrode.
If the metal foil 602 is made of a metal (for example, some stainless steel) which does not have high conductivity, a thin layer of a more conductive metal, for example, aluminum may be formed on the foil 602 before the polymeric material 604 is deposited thereon. The more conductive layer serves to improve the voltage uniformity across the metal foil during operation of the display.
From the foregoing, it will be seen that the controlled voltage conductive layer of the present invention can substantially reduce power consumption in active matrix electro-optic displays. In addition, the controlled voltage conductive layer of the invention may be useful in removing or reducing noise and certain display artifacts which have been observed and which are believed (although the invention is in no way limited by this belief) to be related to voltages induced in metal foils used in backplanes when the voltage on the metal foil is allowed to float.
Mesa Process
The mesa process of the present invention provides a method for reducing thin film strain and this film cracking during the formation of arrays of electronic components (especially, but not exclusively, backplanes for electro-optic displays) when such arrays are being formed on polymer-coated metal substrates. In modern fabs, display substrates can be as large as 1 meter square, and it is important that thin film strain be minimized across this large area.
As already indicated, in accordance with the mesa process of the present invention, instead of forming a continuous layer of polymeric material on the metal substrate, a plurality of discrete areas (hereinafter referred to as “mesas”) of polymeric material are formed on the metal substrate, and a separate array of electronic components, preferably comprising a backplane for an electro-optic display, are formed on each of the discrete areas. In a preferred form of the mesa process, a continuous layer of polymeric material is formed over part of all of one surface of the metal substrate, and this continuous layer is divided to form the discrete mesas.
The mesas 704 isolate the individual backplanes 706 from one another during fabrication of the backplanes, so that thin film strain becomes a function of the smaller mesa area rather than that of the entire substrate 702. The metal substrate 702 still ensures that dimensional stability is preserved.
Those skilled in semiconductor fabrication technology will appreciate that many of the thin film deposition techniques used in such fabrication will, when applied to the structure of
A typical mesa process of the present invention would be as follows:
As already indicated, the mesa process of the present invention reduces thin film strain for large substrates by making the circuit strain a function of the mesa area (essentially the area of each individual backplane or other electronic array) instead of the area of the entire substrate, and enables economical mass production of flexible microelectronics for displays and other applications.
Stitchable Displays
As already indicated, a further aspect of the present invention relates to methods for the integration of flexible electro-optic displays into fabrics, other woven materials, and other flexible materials (for example, leather and polymeric films used in clothing) having similar characteristics. The most practicable way of attaching such flexible electro-optic displays into fabrics and similar materials is by stitching; however, flexible electro-optic displays cannot readily be stitched. Piercing polymeric or metal layers may result in harmful kinks in such layers or may introduce cracks into brittle thin film circuits forming part of the displays.
It has now been realized that the use of metal foils provided with apertures provides a solution to the problem of attaching flexible electro-optic displays into fabrics and similar materials.
Accordingly, the present invention provides an electro-optic display having a metal substrate, the display having a central portion comprising an electro-optic material and means for writing an image on the electro-optic material, and a peripheral portion extending around at least part of the periphery of the central portion, the peripheral portion having a plurality of apertures extending through the metal substrate, by means of which apertures the electro-optic display may be stitched to a flexible medium. Very desirably, the peripheral portion of such a display is free from the electro-optic material. In a preferred form of the invention, the peripheral portion extends completely around the central portion so that the entire periphery of the electro-optic display can be stitched into the fabric or other flexible material.
A preferred stitchable display of the invention is illustrated in
The construction of the display 900 is shown in more detail in
As already mentioned, the electro-optic material 914 does not cover the peripheral portion 904 of the display 900, i.e., the edge seal 918 lies wholly within the rectangle defined by the apertures 906. The polymeric material 910 does, however, extend over the entire upper surface of the metal foil 908. In
The stitchable displays of the present invention are useful not only for electro-optic displays intended for application to clothing, but may also be useful in the construction of large area flexible displays formed from multiple “tiles” (smaller displays).
From the foregoing it will be seen that the stitchable displays of the present invention allows ready and simple attachment of flexible displays using metal foils to fabrics and similar flexible materials without the use of adhesives, which are undesirable for many applications of flexible displays.
1D-Curved Processes
As already mentioned, this invention provides a (first) process for forming an electro-optic display on a substrate curved in one dimension. This process begins with a backplane containing at least one pixel electrode, this backplane being curved in one dimension. The backplane may be pre-formed in this curved configuration, formed flat and flexed into the curved configuration, or bonded, preferably permanently, to a surface curved in one dimension. There is then applied to the curved backplane a laminate comprising a layer of electro-optic medium and a light-transmissive electrically-conductive layer, the laminate being applied so that the electro-optic medium ends up between the backplane and the electrically-conductive layer. The laminate may, and typically does, also comprise a layer of lamination adhesive overlying the layer of electro-optic medium, and the process is carried out so that this layer of lamination adhesive is in immediate contact with the backplane. The laminate is then bonded to the backplane under heat and/or pressure, for example using a bladder press or a heated roll laminator, so that the electro-optic medium bonds to the backplane with minimal stress on the electro-optic medium; any internal stress in the electro-optic medium may be relaxed during the bonding process as the material is allowed to flow. Consequently after the process has been completed, subsequent material creep in the finished display is minimized. Finally, the edges of the laminate and the backplane can be cut and/or sealed using an appropriate sealant.
The laminate used in this process may be prepared by removing the release sheet from a “front plane laminate” as described in copending application Ser. No. 10/249,957, filed May 22, 2003 (Publication No. 2004/0027327). Alternatively, in accordance with the second 1D-curved process of the present invention, this process may be modified to use a “double release film” as described in copending Application Serial No. 10/605,024, filed Sep. 2, 2003 (Publication No. 2004/0155857). Such a double release film comprises a layer of a solid electro-optic medium (“solid” in the sense of having solid external surfaces, although it may contain liquid or gas-filled internal cavities) with adhesive layers on both sides; either or both of these adhesive layers may be covered by a release sheet. To use such a double release film in the process, one adhesive layer is exposed and the double release sheet is laminated to the backplane in the manner already described. The second adhesive layer is then exposed, and an electrically-conductive layer (typically covered by a protective and/or filter layer) is laminated over the layer of electro-optic medium in a second lamination step.
In the first step of the process, as shown in
The lamination process shown in
After the lamination step shown in
2D-Curved Process
Finally, as already indicated, this invention provides a process for forming an electro-optic display on a curved surface; this surface may be curved in one or both dimensions. The process begins with a curved backplane. A coatable electro-optic medium, such as an encapsulated electrophoretic medium, is sprayed or printed on to the surface of the backplane, and if necessary dried, cured or otherwise treated to form a coherent layer. A transparent electrically-conductive layer is sprayed or printed on to the surface of the electro-optic medium, and if necessary dried, cured or otherwise treated to form a coherent layer. A transparent encapsulant is sprayed or printed on to the surface of the electrically-conductive layer, and if necessary dried, cured or otherwise treated to form a coherent layer. Optionally, in a final step of the process, an edge sealant is applied by spraying or printing around the edge of the display to protect the electro-optic medium and possibly other components of the display from the environment, for example to prevent exchange of water and/or oxygen between the display and the surrounding environment.
Although this process can be applied to a surface which is curved in one or two dimensions, the process is primarily intended for use on surfaces curved in two dimensions. The basic structure of the display formed by this process is illustrated in
The backplane 1200 may be a pre-formed backplane, or an originally flat backplane flexed into the configuration shown. The backplane may also be bonded to a curved surface. The backplane can be printed on to a pre-formed flexible substrate, for example a substrate formed by casting material in a die.
To form the preferred display shown in
After formation of the electro-optic medium layer 1202 is complete, the light-transmissive electrically-conductive layer 1204 is superposed thereon by spraying or printing an appropriate material, which may be sprayed or printed in wet or dry form, for example in the form of a slurry or an aerosol; in some cases, drying or curing of the material may be required to form a coherent layer. Similarly, after formation of the electrically-conductive layer 1204 is complete, the light-transmissive encapsulant layer 1206 is superposed thereon by spraying or printing an appropriate material, which may be sprayed or printed in wet or dry form, for example in the form of a slurry or an aerosol; in some cases, drying or curing of the material may be required to form a coherent layer. Finally, a low-stress edge seal encapsulant (not shown) may be sprayed or printed on to the edges of the display to protect the display material from moisture or gas intake or to environmentally stabilize the display.
The preferred 2D-curved process of the present invention described above has the advantages that by coating each layer of the display directly on to a pre-formed curved backplane, material stress, creep, and therefore display non-uniformity, are minimized during subsequent operation and storage. The method is also suitable for use on flat substrates to enable manufacture of ultra-thin electro-optic displays. All the steps of the process can be implemented in a continuous fashion for manufacture, and the method provides a low-cost assembly process for conformal displays due to large material savings and the use of simple web-based or sheet-based manufacturing apparatus, such as spray coaters and infra-red lamps for curing.
Those skilled in the display art will appreciate that numerous changes, improvements and modifications can be made in the preferred embodiments of the invention already described without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, although the invention has been primarily described with reference to the use of encapsulated electrophoretic media, any of the other types of electro-optic media previously described may alternatively be used. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is intended to be construed in an illustrative and not in a limitative sense.
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/836,884, filed Apr. 17, 2001 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,825,068), and claiming benefit of Application Ser. No. 60/197,731, filed Apr. 18, 2000. This application also claims benefit of Application Ser. No. 60/319,732, filed Nov. 26, 2002 and Application Ser. No. 60/481,396, filed Sep. 18, 2003. The entire contents of these three applications are herein incorporated by reference. The entire contents of all U.S. patents and applications mentioned below are also herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3036388 | Tate | May 1962 | A |
3384488 | Tulagin et al. | May 1968 | A |
3612758 | Evans et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3668106 | Ota | Jun 1972 | A |
3670323 | Sobel et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3745070 | Yada et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3756693 | Ota | Sep 1973 | A |
3767392 | Ota | Oct 1973 | A |
3792308 | Ota | Feb 1974 | A |
3806893 | Ohnishi et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3850627 | Wells et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3870517 | Ota et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3892568 | Ota | Jul 1975 | A |
3972040 | Hilsum et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4001140 | Foris et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4041481 | Sato | Aug 1977 | A |
4045327 | Noma et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4068927 | White | Jan 1978 | A |
4071430 | Liebert | Jan 1978 | A |
4088395 | Gigila | May 1978 | A |
4112309 | Nakazawa et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4123346 | Ploix | Oct 1978 | A |
4149149 | Miki et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4203106 | Dalisa et al. | May 1980 | A |
4218302 | Dalisa et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4261653 | Goodrich | Apr 1981 | A |
4273672 | Vassiliades | Jun 1981 | A |
4305807 | Somlyody | Dec 1981 | A |
4311361 | Somlyody | Jan 1982 | A |
4324456 | Dalisa | Apr 1982 | A |
4390403 | Batchelder | Jun 1983 | A |
4418346 | Batchelder | Nov 1983 | A |
4430648 | Togashi et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4439507 | Pan et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4450440 | White | May 1984 | A |
4502934 | Gazard et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4522472 | Liebert et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4543306 | Dubois et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4598960 | DiSanto et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4643528 | Bell, Jr. | Feb 1987 | A |
4648956 | Marshall et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655897 | DiSanto et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4686524 | White | Aug 1987 | A |
4741604 | Kornfeld | May 1988 | A |
4742345 | DiSanto et al. | May 1988 | A |
4746917 | DiSanto et al. | May 1988 | A |
4758875 | Fujisaki et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4776675 | Takaochi et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4828967 | Mase et al. | May 1989 | A |
4833464 | DiSanto et al. | May 1989 | A |
4850919 | DiSanto et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4883561 | Gmitter et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4892607 | DiSanto et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4931019 | Park | Jun 1990 | A |
4947157 | DiSanto et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4947159 | DiSanto et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4954612 | Nomura et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5008590 | Huisman et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5009490 | Kouno et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5028841 | DiSanto et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041824 | DiSanto et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053763 | DiSanto et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5066105 | Yoshimoto et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5066946 | Disanto et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5070326 | Yoshimoto et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5077157 | DiSanto et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5105185 | Nakanowatari et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5119218 | Yoshimoto et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5128226 | Hung | Jul 1992 | A |
5128785 | Yoshimoto et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5148300 | Mizushima et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5153986 | Brauer et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5161007 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5174882 | DiSanto et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175020 | Doellein et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175047 | McKenney et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5187609 | DiSanto et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5194852 | More et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5206749 | Zavracky et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5216416 | DiSanto et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220316 | Kazan | Jun 1993 | A |
5223115 | DiSanto et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5223823 | Disanto et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5234541 | Shannon et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247290 | DiSanto et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5250938 | DiSanto et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5254981 | Disanto et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5266937 | DiSanto et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270843 | Wang | Dec 1993 | A |
5276438 | DiSanto et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279694 | DiSanto et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5288541 | Blackwell et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5293528 | DiSanto et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296974 | Tada et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5302235 | DiSanto et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303073 | Shirota et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5304439 | DiSanto et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5315312 | DiSanto et al. | May 1994 | A |
5345251 | DiSanto et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5362671 | Zavracky et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383008 | Sheridon | Jan 1995 | A |
5389945 | Sheridon | Feb 1995 | A |
5402145 | DiSanto et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403772 | Zhang et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411656 | Schubert | May 1995 | A |
5412398 | DiSanto et al. | May 1995 | A |
5460688 | DiSanto et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5463491 | Check, III | Oct 1995 | A |
5463492 | Check, III | Oct 1995 | A |
5467107 | DiSanto et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5500537 | Tsumura et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5508720 | DiSanto et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5543589 | Buchana et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545291 | Smith et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5561539 | Funahata et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565885 | Tamanoi | Oct 1996 | A |
5569610 | Zhang et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571311 | Belmont et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575554 | Guritz | Nov 1996 | A |
5583675 | Yamada et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5614340 | Bugner et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623585 | Matias et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625199 | Baumbach et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627561 | Laspina et al. | May 1997 | A |
5650199 | Chang et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650872 | Saxe et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5684501 | Knapp et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688584 | Casson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689282 | Wolfs et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5705424 | Zavracky et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5707738 | Hou | Jan 1998 | A |
5709976 | Malhotra | Jan 1998 | A |
5717514 | Sheridon | Feb 1998 | A |
5718996 | Iijima et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725935 | Rajan | Mar 1998 | A |
5731116 | Matsuo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737115 | Mackinlay et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5738977 | Van Der Sluis-Van Der Voort et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744283 | Spierings et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745094 | Gordon, II et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760761 | Sheridon | Jun 1998 | A |
5777782 | Sheridon | Jul 1998 | A |
5783856 | Smith et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786875 | Brader et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5808783 | Crowley | Sep 1998 | A |
5821137 | Wakai et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5854380 | Seto et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5872552 | Gordon, II et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5889325 | Uchida et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892244 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892504 | Knapp | Apr 1999 | A |
5894367 | Sheridon | Apr 1999 | A |
5898416 | Kuijk et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904545 | Smith et al. | May 1999 | A |
5930026 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936259 | Katz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5961804 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969376 | Bao | Oct 1999 | A |
5972493 | Iwasaki et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980763 | Young | Nov 1999 | A |
6005791 | Gudesen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005817 | Gudesen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013335 | Hirata et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017584 | Albert et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6027958 | Vu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033742 | Iwanaga et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045955 | Vincent | Apr 2000 | A |
6052354 | Gudesen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054071 | Mikkelsen, Jr. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055091 | Sheridon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055180 | Gudesen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064091 | Deane et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067185 | Albert et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084850 | Gudesen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088319 | Gudesen | Jul 2000 | A |
6091382 | Shioya et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097531 | Sheridon | Aug 2000 | A |
6118426 | Albert et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120588 | Jacobson | Sep 2000 | A |
6120839 | Comiskey et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124851 | Jacobson | Sep 2000 | A |
6128124 | Silverman | Oct 2000 | A |
6130773 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130774 | Albert et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137467 | Sheridon et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144361 | Gordon, II et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147791 | Sheridon | Nov 2000 | A |
6172798 | Albert et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172878 | Takabayashi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177921 | Comiskey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184856 | Gordon, II et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212057 | Kohara et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219253 | Green | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225971 | Gordon, II et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232950 | Albert et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239896 | Ikeda | May 2001 | B1 |
6241921 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249271 | Albert et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252564 | Albert et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262706 | Albert et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262833 | Loxley et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271823 | Gordon, II et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281038 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300932 | Albert | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301038 | Fitzmaurice et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312304 | Duthaler et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6312971 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323034 | Chen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323989 | Jacobson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327072 | Comiskey et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343164 | Robertsson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6355125 | Tahon et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356332 | Ichikawa et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359605 | Knapp et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373454 | Knapp et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373461 | Hasegawa et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373545 | Yang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376828 | Comiskey | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377387 | Duthaler et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392785 | Albert et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6392786 | Albert | May 2002 | B1 |
6403396 | Gudesen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413790 | Duthaler et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422687 | Jacobson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432739 | Gudesen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445374 | Albert et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6445489 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459418 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461901 | Noguchi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473072 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480182 | Turner et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483123 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498114 | Amundson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504524 | Gates et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506438 | Duthaler et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512354 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6515649 | Albert et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518513 | Enomoto et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518949 | Drzaic | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521489 | Duthaler et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6531997 | Gates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535197 | Comiskey et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538801 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545291 | Amundson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6580545 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583780 | Kawai | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6639578 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652075 | Jacobson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657772 | Loxley | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664944 | Albert et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6672921 | Liang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680725 | Jacobson | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683333 | Kazlas et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6693620 | Herb et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704133 | Gates et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6710540 | Albert et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721083 | Jacobson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724519 | Comiskey et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727881 | Albert et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738050 | Comiskey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750473 | Amundson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753999 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6788449 | Liang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6816147 | Albert | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819471 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822782 | Honeyman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825068 | Denis et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825829 | Albert et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6825970 | Goenaga et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831769 | Holman et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839158 | Albert et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842167 | Albert et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842279 | Amundson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842657 | Drzaic et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6844957 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6864875 | Drzaic et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865010 | Duthaler et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866760 | Paolini Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870657 | Fitzmaurice et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6870661 | Pullen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6900851 | Morrison et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6982178 | LeCain et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7046328 | Jacobsen et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20020060321 | Kazlas et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063661 | Comiskey et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020090980 | Wilcox et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020113770 | Jacobson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130832 | Baucom et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020180687 | Webber | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030011560 | Albert et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030020844 | Albert et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030102858 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030132908 | Herb et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137521 | Zehner et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157783 | Fonash et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030214695 | Abramson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222315 | Amundson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040012839 | Cao et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040014265 | Kazlas et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027327 | LeCain et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040075634 | Gates | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040094422 | Pullen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105036 | Danner et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040108504 | Forbes et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112750 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119681 | Albert et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136048 | Arango et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155857 | Duthaler et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040180476 | Kazlas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190114 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196215 | Duthaler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040226820 | Webber et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233509 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239614 | Amundson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252360 | Webber et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257635 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263947 | Drzaic et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000813 | Pullen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050001812 | Amundson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007336 | Albert et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007653 | Honeyman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050012980 | Wilcox et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017944 | Albert | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018273 | Honeyman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024353 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035941 | Albert et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041004 | Gates et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050062714 | Zehner et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067656 | Denis et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078099 | Amundson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099672 | Jacobson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050105159 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050105162 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122284 | Gates et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122306 | Wilcox et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122563 | Honeyman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122564 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122565 | Doshi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060001023 | Akiyama et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 404 545 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0 443 571 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0 618 715 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 709 713 | May 1996 | EP |
0 924 551 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 145 072 | May 2003 | EP |
2 098 800 | Nov 1982 | GB |
2 149 548 | Jun 1985 | GB |
2 306 229 | Apr 1997 | GB |
62-058222 | Mar 1987 | JP |
63-084089 | Apr 1988 | JP |
05-061421 | Mar 1993 | JP |
11-202804 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001-022301 | Jan 2001 | JP |
WO 9506307 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9510107 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9920682 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9963527 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0005312 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0005704 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0022051 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0036560 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0038000 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0067110 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0067327 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0107961 | Feb 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040180476 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60197731 | Apr 2000 | US | |
60319732 | Nov 2002 | US | |
60481396 | Sep 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09836884 | Apr 2001 | US |
Child | 10707184 | US |