Flexible, event-driven JavaScript server architecture

Abstract

A script server architecture is disclosed herein. The script server architecture includes a core comprising means for creating a DOM node in a HTML document, a framework written in JavaScript, the framework comprising a plurality of registered event handlers for performing the business logic of the script server architecture and means for modifying the DOM of a HTML document, and means for bridging the core and the framework.

Description

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention is related to development of Web sites and applications. More specifically, the present invention relates to facilitated communications between a client-side and a server-side.

2. Description of the Related Art

Prior to Rich Internet Applications, traditional Web applications involved a client-server architecture with all of the processing on the server side and the client-side used to display the HTML web-pages served by the server. Each time a user desired to view a new Web-page, a HTTP request was sent to the server and the requested Web-page was served to the Web browser on the client-side. Such a traditional system is shown in FIG. 1 with a Web-server 1000 on a server side receiving requests over the Internet 1005 from a Web-browser 1003 on a client-side.

Rich Internet Applications, such as Ajax, greatly improved on the traditional client-server architecture by allowing the client machine to dynamically render and partially refresh web pages based on an initial set of instructions from the server, user input, and small amounts of subsequent data dynamically requested from the server. As shown in FIG. 2, the client machine processes Ajax instructions to render a Web page for the user.

Early Web applications allowed a user's browser to send a request to a server. The server processed the request and responded to the browser with a Web page. When the user wanted to view a new page, another request was sent to the server and the server responded to the browser with a new Web page. Such a process resulted in a waste of bandwidth since much of the Web contents in the first Web page were also contained in the second web page. The need to resend the same information led to a much slower user interface of a Web application than that of a native application.

An emerging technology, called Ajax (Asynchronous and JavaScript XML), was developed for refreshing part of a page instead of refreshing the whole page on every interaction between the user and application. In an Ajax application, when a user submits a form in a page, a script program, usually a JavaScript program, resident on the Web browser receives the user's request and sends a XML (Extended Markup Language) HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol) request to the Web server in background so as to retrieve only the needed Web contents instead of the whole page and perform corresponding processing to partly refresh the page when receiving a response from the Web server. In this way, the application response time is shortened, because the amount of data exchanged between the Web browser and the Web server is greatly reduced. And the processing time of the Web server is saved because much of the processing is performed at the client side.

General definitions for terms utilized in the pertinent art are set forth below.

Ajax is the use of dynamic HTML, JavaScript and CSS to create dynamic and usually interactive Web sites and applications. A more detailed explanation of Ajax is set forth in Edmond Woychowsky, AJAX, Creating Web Pages with Asynchronous JavaScript and XML, Prentice Hall, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Applets or Java Applets are mini-executable programs named with the .class suffix and are placed on a Web page and provide interactive and multimedia uses.

Application Programming Interface (API) is a collection of computer software code, usually a set of class definitions, that can perform a set of related complex tasks, but has a limited set of controls that may be manipulated by other software-code entities. The set of controls is deliberately limited for the sake of clarity and ease of use, so that programmers do not have to work with the detail contained within the given API itself.

An Attribute provides additional information about an element, object or file. In a Document Object Model, an attribute, or attribute node, is contained within an element node.

Behavioral layer is the top layer and is the scripting and programming that adds interactivity and dynamic effects to a site.

Binding in a general sense is the linking of a library to an application program usually to prevent repetition of frequently utilized code.

Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) is a W3C standard for defining the presentation of Web documents.

Compiler is a computer program that translates a series of instructions written in one computer language into a resulting output in a different computer language.

Document Object Model (DOM) Element is an object contained in a Document Object Model (DOM). The term DOM is generally used to refer to the particular DOM held in the memory region being used by the Web browser. Such a DOM controls the Graphical Respondent Interface (GRI) or Graphical User Interface (GUI). The DOM is generated according to the information that the Web browser reads from the HTML file, and/or from direct JavaScript software instructions. Generally, there exists a unique DOM element for every unique HTML element. DOM elements are sometimes referred to as HTML/DOM elements, because the DOM element exists only because HTML code that was read by the Web browser listed some HTML element that had not previously existed, and thereby caused the Web browser to create that DOM element. Often specific elements of the greater set of HTML/DOM elements are identified by specifying an HTML/DOM checkbox element, or an HTML/DOM text input element. A more detailed explanation of the document object model is set forth in Jeremy Keith, DOM Scripting, Web Design with JavaScript and the Document Object Model, friendsof, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

HyperText Markup Language (HTML) is a method of mixing text and other content with layout and appearance commands in a text file, so that a browser can generate a displayed image from the file.

Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a set of conventions for controlling the transfer of information via the Internet from a Web server computer to a client computer, and also from a client computer to a Web server.

Internet is the worldwide, decentralized totality of server computers and data-transmission paths which can supply information to a connected and browser-equipped client computer, and can receive and forward information entered from the client computer.

JavaScript is an object-based programming language. JavaScript is an interpreted language, not a compiled language. JavaScript is generally designed for writing software routines that operate within a client computer on the Internet. Generally, the software routines are downloaded to the client computer at the beginning of the interactive session, if they are not already cached on the client computer. JavaScript is discussed in greater detail below.

JSON is JavaScript Object Notation format, which is a way of taking data and turning it into valid JavaScript syntax for reconstituting an object at the other end of the transmission protocol.

MySQL is a relational database management system which relies on SQL for processing data in a database.

Parser is a component of a compiler that analyzes a sequence of tokens to determine its grammatical structure with respect to a given formal grammer. Parsing transforms input text into a data structure, usually a tree, which is suitable for later processing and which captures the implied hierarchy of the input. XML Parsers ensure that an XML document follows the rules of XML markup syntax correctly.

Platform is the combination of a client computer, an operating system, and a browser, which together can support Internet access and in particular the operation of interactive forms.

Presentation layer follows the structural layer, and provides instructions on how the document should look on the screen, sound when read aloud or be formatted when it is printed.

Rendering engine is software used with a Web browser that takes Web content (HTML, XML, image files) and formatting information (CSS, XSL) and displays the formatted content on a screen.

Serialization places an object in a binary form for transmission across a network such as the Internet and deserialization involves extracting a data structure from a series of bytes.

SQL (Structured Query Language) is a computer language designed for data retrieval and data management in a database.

Structural layer of a Web page is the marked up document and foundation on which other layers may be applied.

User is a client computer, generally operated by a human being, but in some system contexts running an automated process not under full-time human control.

Web-Browser is a complex software program, resident in a client computer, that is capable of loading and displaying text and images and exhibiting behaviors as encoded in HTML (HyperText Markup Language) from the Internet, and also from the client computer's memory. Major browsers include MICROSOFT INTERNET EXPLORER, NETSCAPE, APPLE SAFARI, MOZILLA FIREFOX, and OPERA.

Web-Server is a computer able to simultaneously manage many Internet information-exchange processes at the same time. Normally, server computers are more powerful than client computers, and are administratively and/or geographically centralized. An interactive-form information-collection process generally is controlled from a server computer, to which the sponsor of the process has access.

World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) is an unofficial standards body which creates and oversees the development of web technologies and the application of those technologies.

XHTML (Extensible Hypertext Markup Language) is a language for describing the content of hypertext documents intended to be viewed or read in a browser.

XML (Extensible Markup Language) is a W3C standard for text document markup, and it is not a language but a set of rules for creating other markup languages.

There are three types of JavaScript: 1) Client-side JavaScript; 2) Server-side JavaScript; and 3) Core JavaScript. Client-side JavaScript is generally an extended version of JavaScript that enables the enhancement and manipulation of web pages and client browsers. Server-side JavaScript is an extended version of JavaScript that enables back-end access to databases, file systems, and servers. Core JavaScript is the base JavaScript.

Core JavaScript includes the following objects: array, date, math, number and string. Client-side JavaScript and Server-side JavaScript have additional objects and functions that are specific to client-side or server-side functionality. Generally, any JavaScript libraries (.js files) created in core JavaScript can be used on both the client and the server without changes. Client-side JavaScript is composed of a Core JavaScript and additional objects such as: document, form, frame and window. The objects in Client-side JavaScript enable manipulation of HTML documents (checking form fields, submitting forms, creating dynamic pages) and the browser (directing the browser to load other HTML pages, display messages). Server-side JavaScript is composed of Core JavaScript and additional objects and functions for accessing databases and file systems, and sending email. Server-side JavaScript enables Web developers to efficiently create database-driven web applications. Server-side JavaScript is generally used to create and customize server-based applications by scripting the interaction between objects. Client-side JavaScript may be served by any server but only displayed by JavaScript-enabled browsers. Server-side JavaScript must be served by a JavaScript-enabled server but can be displayed by any browser.

United States Patent Publication Number 20010037359 describes a system and method for a server-side browser including markup language graphical user interface, dynamic markup language rewriter engine and profile engine. The system includes a user computer and a destination server computer separated by a server computer hosting a server-side browser (SSB). The SSB includes a markup language graphical user interface (MLGUI), a dynamic markup language rewriter engine (DMLRE) and a profiling engine (PE). The SSB may be configured as an intermediary infrastructure residing on the Internet providing customized information gathering for a user. The components of the SSB allow for controlling, brokering and distributing information more perfectly by controlling both browser functionality (on the client-side) and server functionality (on the destination site side) within a single point and without the necessity of incremental consents or integration of either side.

Irassar et al., United States Patent Publication Number 20040250262, for Business To Business Event Communications discloses an event handling mechanism that allows communication of event information among providers and subscribers across a network using an event handling server.

Jennings et al., United States Patent Publication Number 20070073739 for a Data-Driven And Plug-In Defined Event Engine, discloses an event engine that enables application developers to define finite state machines for implementation via a data-driven approach using executable plug-ins.

Lindhorst et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,981,215 for a System For Converting Event-Driven Code Into Serially Executed Code, discloses an event-driven server model that uses active server pages that appear to other files as objects with associated method and properties for developing Web pages.

However, current technologies that operate server-side JavaScript fail to offer complete interactions which are the hallmark of rich web sites and applications. Modern browsers are sophisticated software: they understand multiple versions of HTML, JavaScript, and CSS; they are extremely forgiving of HTML variations, errors, omissions, etc.; they are fast; they parse and execute as they process the incoming stream; and they allow complex, dynamic manipulation of the HTML DOM by JavaScript. To do all this on the server, and to keep doing it well as web technologies and standards evolve, it's best to use a real browser's engine. But browsers are not immediately suitable for use as servers: they do too much client-oriented work that makes little sense for a server that does not interact directly with users, e.g. rendering to a graphical display or handling user events; and they don't do enough server-oriented tasks such as accessing databases and files or selectively executing just the code that should run on the server rather than on the client.

The first thing that must be done is to extract just the engine of the browser, and do so in such a way that the important aspects are preserved: it can evolve as the browser evolves; it can still carry out the basic functionalities needed on the server; etc. Then the engine must be extended to provide the additional server functionalities. But because the engine is usually a highly-optimized program written in a native (platform-specific) language such as C/C++, it is a lot of work to extend it in the same language, and once extended in a certain way, it is a lot of work to change it.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The Present Invention overcomes the obstacles of the prior art. The JavaScript server architecture of the present invention allows the best of both worlds: keeping the advantages of the browser engine—the core—and coupling it to a flexible, extensible, accessible server framework. The framework is therefore preferably written in a flexible, extensible, accessible language: for the present invention, JavaScript is the natural choice, though other languages such as Ruby or Python could be used without departing from the scope of the present invention. To bridge the core and the framework, the server architecture of the present invention uses events: at certain moments during the core's processing of the HTML document (and any included documents), it notifies the framework by sending it specific events. The events contain (or make accessible) data that is relevant for that event and for that particular stage in the processing. The framework acts on those events by having registered event handlers, which carry out much of the business logic of present invention. For example, when the core encounters a <script> tag in the HTML document, it creates a DOM node corresponding to that <script> tag, and notifies the framework that a NewHTMLElement event has occurred; the framework looks at the associated data, determines that the tag was a script element, and depending on the attributes of the script element (specifically its “runat” attribute) notifies the core whether or not to actually process the JavaScript inside that script tag. The framework can also modify the DOM, hand control to the developer's code, or do various things at that point in the processing. Because the framework itself is written in JavaScript, web developers can feel comfortable extending or modifying the framework to suit their own needs.

In a preferred embodiment, the server architecture of the present invention is a combination of C/C++ “Core” code and a server-side JavaScript “Framework.” The server-core provides the JavaScript parser and runtime, HTML parser and DOM engine, and an event architecture that calls the server-framework as the document is being processed on the server. The server-framework provides the server logic, for example deciding which code to run on the server and which on the client, creating proxies on the client for callable server-side functions, serializing and deserializing data, and so on.

Because the server-framework is preferably written in JavaScript, the server-framework is easily extensible by developers. The present invention is preferably an extensible platform for end-to-end Ajax development and for building rich presentation layers on top of existing back-end platforms.

On the server side, a developer's JavaScript environment is enhanced by the server-framework, which provides access to the database (for example, MySQL), file system, network, the HTTP Request and Response data, and the external server-side platforms such as Java, PHP, and Ruby.

One aspect of the present invention is a server architecture including a core, a framework and means for bridging the core and the framework. The core includes means for reading an HTML, means for reading a CSS, means for reading a JavaScript, and means for creating a DOM node in a HTML document. The framework is written in JavaScript and includes a plurality of registered event handlers for performing the logic of the server architecture and means for modifying the DOM of a HTML document.

Another aspect of the present invention is a web environment including a Web server-side and a Web client-side. The Web server-side includes a HTTP request server, a handler in communication with the HTTP request server, and a server architecture in communication with the handler. The server architecture includes a core, a framework and means for bridging the core and framework. The core includes means for reading an HTML, means for reading a CSS, means for reading a JavaScript and means for creating a DOM node in a HTML document. The framework is written in JavaScript, the framework comprising a plurality of registered event handlers for performing the logic of the server architecture, and means for modifying the DOM of a HTML document. The web-client side includes a graphical user interface, a browser engine for transmitting a HTTP request to the HTTP request server, a JavaScript code, and a rendering engine for rendering the JavaScript code for display on the graphical user interface.

Another aspect of the present invention is a computer program product for a server. The computer program includes a core, a frame work and means for bridging the core and framework. The core includes means for creating a DOM node in a HTML document. The framework is written in JavaScript and includes a plurality of registered event handlers for performing the business logic of the JavaScript server architecture and means for modifying the DOM of a HTML document.

Yet another aspect of the present invention is a web environment which includes a web server-side and a web client-side. The web-server side includes a HTTP request server, a handler in communication with the HTTP request server, and a server architecture in communication with the handler. The server architecture includes a core having a plurality of web-browser capabilities, a framework written in JavaScript and means for bridging the core and framework. The web-client side includes a graphical user interface, a browser engine for transmitting a HTTP request to the HTTP request server, a JavaScript code, and a rendering engine for rendering the JavaScript code for display on the graphical user interface.

Yet another aspect of the present invention is a system for web development which includes a server architecture. The server architecture includes a core, a framework and means for bridging the core and the framework. The core includes means for creating a DOM node in a HTML document. The framework is written in JavaScript and includes a plurality of registered event handlers for performing the business logic of the JavaScript server architecture and means for modifying the DOM of a HTML document.

Yet another aspect of the present invention is a method for processing a HTML page on a server. The method begins with encountering a HTML document by a core of a JavaScript architecture. Then creating a DOM node corresponding to the HTML document. Then, notifying a framework of the JavaScript architecture that an event has occurred. Then, inspecting the HTML document by the framework. Then, directing the core pertaining to processing the HTML document.

Yet another aspect of the present invention is a method for processing a HTML page on a server. The method includes encountering a <script> tag in a HTML document by a core of a JavaScript architecture. Then, creating a DOM node corresponding to the <script> tag of the HTML document. Then, notifying a framework of the JavaScript architecture that a new HTML element event has occurred. Then, inspecting an associated data of the new HTML element to determine if the tag was a script element. Finally, directing the core pertaining to processing the script element.

To understand the differences between the server and browser sides, it's important to keep in mind the page lifecycle. The page request from the browser is received by the Web server, which fetches the appropriate HTML document (either from the file system or perhaps from another “handler” such as PHP or Ruby or Java). The Web server (Apache server) then feeds the document to the script server of the present invention, which begins to parse the HTML document and builds up the DOM tree. When the script server encounters <script> tags the script server not only adds them to the DOM but may also execute them if they have a runat attribute that indicates they should run on the server. During the parsing and execution, external content may also be fetched and loaded into the document, via <script src=“ . . . ”></script> elements and Jaxer.load( . . . ) for JavaScript code, or via <jaxer:include src=“ . . . ”></jaxer:include> (or <jaxer:include path=“ . . . ”></jaxer:include>) for HTML content, or via XMLHttpRequests for any content. After the DOM is fully loaded, the onserverload event is fired. This is the server-side equivalent of the onload event on the browser. The onserverload event is named differently so that a developer's code can react separately to onserverload and onload events. The script server post-processes the DOM to carry out its built-in logic and prepare the DOM for sending to the browser: removing <script> blocks meant only for the server, replacing functions to be proxied with proxies, saving (as needed) functions that should be available on callbacks, . . . etc. Finally, the DOM is serialized back to HTML, and that HTML is streamed back via the Web server to the browser.

The resulting HTML page is sent back to the browser as the response to the browser's request. The browser begins to parse the HTML, building up the DOM. When the browser encounters <script> tags the browser not only adds them to the DOM but also executes them. External JavaScript code or any other content may also be loaded. The onload event fires. Of course the page is progressively rendered throughout much of this flow, and also the user can interact with it.

Callbacks from the browser to server-side functions are handled via XMLHttpRequests. When the script server receives such a request, it creates a new, empty document (unless configured to use a different static document). The script server retrieves the saved functions that needed to be made available during callbacks to this page. If a function called oncallback is found, it is executed. This is usually used to create the environment needed during a callback, if the saved functions are not enough. The callback function itself is executed. Finally, the result of that execution is packaged and returned as the response to the XMLHttpRequest.

While a DOM is available during callback processing, it is not serialized as HTML and returned as the response, as it was during the “regular” (non-callback) page processing flow. The DOM on script server and the DOM on the browser typically are not synchronized. Both are created from the same HTML source, but they are often subject to processing by different JavaScript code, and both come to life at different points in the page lifecycle: the DOM on the script server exists temporarily when the page is processed by the script server, and is eliminated after it's been serialized into the HTML sent to the browser; the DOM in the browser is built, on the browser, from that HTML, and is the DOM that's rendered to the user and with which the end-user interacts.

While script server and the browser may well share some code (e.g. when using runat=“both”), usually the JavaScript code designated to run on script server and interacting with the script server DOM is different than the code designated to run on the client. The latter exists e.g. as a <script> tag in the script server DOM but is not executed in script server.

Remember that the only things sent to the browser at the end of page processing is what's actually in the DOM, and what the script server of the present invention has added such as proxies, clientData, and injected scripts. For example, if a developer added an expando property, which is an in-memory change to the DOM that will not get serialized, it will not appear on the client side.

var div=document.createElement (“div”);

div.id=“myDiv”;

document.body.appendChild(div);

document.getElementById(“myDiv”).userId=123;

On the browser the div is present, with an id of “myDiv”, but without a “userId” property. For this same reason, setting event handlers programatically rather than in the DOM will not translate to DOM changes and hence will not propagate to the browser. For example with a button: <input type=“button” id=“myButton” value=“Click me”>

A developer could add an onclick=“ . . . ” attribute to the tag, but this does not assist with adding the event handler programatically. The script server of the present invention provides Jaxer.setEvent (domElement, eventName, handler) function that “does the right thing” in the script server as well as on the browser. var btn=document.getElementById(“myButton”); function sayHi( ) {alert (“hi”)} sayHi.runat=“client”; Jaxer.setEvent(btn, “onclick”, sayHi);

The function used as the event handler should be made available to the browser. When setEvent is executed on the server, as above, it results in the following change to the myButton element: <input type=“button” id=“myButton” value=“Click me” onclick=“sayHi( )”> This is sent to the browser since it is a DOM change. If the function passed into setEvent has no name, its body (source) is used as the value of the attribute: var btn=document.getEleemntById(“myButton”); Jaxer.setEvent(btn, “onclick”, function( ) {alert(“hi”);});

This results in the following: <input type=“button” id=“myButton” value=“Click me” onclick=“(function( ) {alert(\“hi\);}) ( )”>

Which is useful for short functions but is easier to pass in the code to execute as a string: var btn=document.getEleemntById(“myButton”);Jaxer.setEvent(btn, “onclick”, “alert(‘hi’)”);

Which results in:<input type=“button” id=“myButton” value=“Click me” onclick=“alert(‘hi’)”>

Having briefly described the present invention, the above and further objects, features and advantages thereof will be recognized by those skilled in the pertinent art from the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a web system of the prior art.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a web system of the prior art.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the system of the present invention during a callback.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the system of the present invention during a normal process.

FIG. 4A is a block diagram of the system of the present invention during a normal process.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a callback process.

FIG. 6 is a Web-page generated by the code.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of the server of the system of the present invention.

FIG. 7A is a block diagram of the user-computer of the system of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart of a general method of the present invention.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart of a specific method of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a prior art application stack illustrating the interactions between the client side and the server-side.

FIG. 11 is a block diagram of an application stack of the present invention illustrating the interactions between the client side and the server-side.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As shown in FIG. 3 a system 20 of the invention generally includes a server-side 25, a client side 30 and a network or preferably the Internet 35. The server-side 25 includes a web-server 40, a handler 45 and a JavaScript server 50 preferably having a server-core 55 and a server-framework 60. The client-side 30 includes a Web-browser 65 has a client-framework 70, a client-side JavaScript code 75 and a rendering engine 80. The server-framework 60 accesses filesystems 85 and databases 90, as well as the Internet 35. A more detailed description of the abilities of the running JavaScript on the server-side and client-side is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/270,817, filed Nov. 13, 2008 for A Web Server Based On The Same Paradigms As Web-Clients, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

In FIG. 3, the system 20 is shown during a callback operation. The callback begins at the client-side JavaScript code 75 with a callback request sent to the client-framework 70. A HTTP GET/request is transmitted over the Internet 35 to the server-side 25, and received at the Web-server 40. The HTTP GET/request is sent to the server-core 55 which sends the HTTP GET/request as a callback to the server-framework 60. The server-framework 60 receives the callback, deserializes, performs the get functions, invokes, serializes and sends the response to the callback to the server-core 55. The server-core 55 sends the response to the Web-server 40 which sends the response over the Internet 35 to client-framework 70 on the Web-browser 65.

In FIG. 4, the system 20 is shown during a normal process. The process begins with a HTTP GET/request for a Web-page sent over the Internet 35 from the Web-browser 65 on the client-side 30 to the server-side 25. The HTTP Request is sent to the handler server 45. The HTML Web-page is then sent to the script server architecture 50. The server-core 55 of the script server architecture 50 parses the HTML Web-page to create a HTML DOM of the HTML Web-page. The server-core 55 also parses and interprets the JavaScript of the HTML Web-page. The server-framework 60 accesses databases 90 and filesystems 85 to respond to the Requests for the HTML Web-page. The server-framework 60 also injects proxies to modify the HTML Web-page. The server-core 55 serializes the DOM back to the HTML Web-page and the web-server 40 transmits the HTML Web-page to the client-side 30 where the Web-browser 65 renders the HTML Web-page for display for a user. As shown in FIG. 4A, a Web server (e.g., apache server) 41 receives a request from the client-side. The request 67 is sent to the handler server (PHP, Ruby or Java language) 45. The handler server 45 feeds the HTML document to script server-core 55 which begins to parse the HTML document thereby building the DOM tree for the HTML document on the server-side. Events and callbacks are sent to the script server-framework 60. The script server adds <script> tags to the DOM and executes them if the <script> has a runat attribute that indicates the <script> should be run on the server. During the parsing and execution, external content from filesystems 85, databases 90, and the like are fetched and loaded into the HTML document. After the DOM is loaded, the onserverload event is fired from the script server framework 60. The script server architecture post-processes the DOM to perform its built in logic and prepare the DOM for transmission to the client side. This post-process includes removing <script> block meant only for the server, replacing function to be proxied with proxies, saving functions that should be available as callbacks, and the like. The DOM is serialized back to HTML, and the HTML is streamed back via the web server 41 to the browser.

FIGS. 10 and 11 illustrate the difference in the application stacks between the prior art and the present invention. In both FIGS. 10 and 11, a client-side is designated 30 includes the HTML/DOM, CSS and JavaScript. In both FIGS. 10 and 11, arrow 91 is a request, arrow 92 is a response and arrow (both directions) 93 is a callback. The server-side 25 is the difference. The server-side 25 of the prior art is PHP, Java, RoR and C#. The server-side of the present invention is HTML/DOM, CSS and JavaScript.

As shown in FIG. 5, the present invention allows the server 50 to execute the JavaScript functions that are set to runat=“server” or runat=“both”. These functions might call databases, file systems, communicate across network sockets, or get session data. And since the server-side engine has a HTML DOM just like the browser, the HTML page can be manipulated through standard DOM APIs and your favorite Ajax libraries. The present invention also has session objects that can be used to persist data for users during a session or transaction. Any functions set to runat=“server” are stripped from what gets sent to the browser 65. Specifically at 1, the page executes on the server 50 and a resulting HTML page is sent to the browser 65. A more detailed description of the runat function is set forth in Colton et al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/270,868, filed on Nov. 14, 2008, for a System And Method For Tagging Code To Determine Where The Code Runs, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

After server 50 sends the resulting HTML page to the browser 65, at 2 the browser 65 interprets the HTML page and executes the JavaScript within the HTML page. If JavaScript functions tagged to runat=“server-proxy” are included, then the present invention automatically strips out the bodies of those functions and replaces the bodies with a new functions by the same name that know how to invoke the original function on the server 50 using Ajax calls and return the result either synchronously or asynchronously. Ajax communications do not need to be written using the present invention. Any functions not tagged with a runat attribute or set to runat=“client” or runat=“both” are processed by the browser 65.

Any functions set to runat=“server-proxy” can now be called from the browser 65. The function is called as if it were running on the browser 65, and the present invention, automatically via XHR communications with the server 50, marshals the parameters to the server 50 where the function executes (calling databases, getting info from the session data, etc. . . . ) and returns the result to the browser 65. The “server-proxy” functions can be invoked either synchronously or asynchronously. At 3, the browser 65 calls the server 50 asynchronously for new information.

The server computer program of the present invention is pre-configured for preferable use as a plug-in to the APACHE 2.x web server. To provide standards-compliant JavaScript and DOM capabilities server-side, the server computer program is built on the MOZILLA engine, which is the same engine used in the popular FIREFOX browser. The server computer program of the present invention is layered into APACHE as an input and output filter for use to modify dynamic pages created by other languages, such as PHP or Ruby.

The server computer program of the present invention is preferably a combination of C/C++ “Core” code and a server-side JavaScript “Framework.” The server-core 55 provides the JavaScript parser and runtime, HTML parser and DOM engine, and an event architecture that calls the server-framework 60 as the document is being processed on the server-side 25. The server-framework 60 provides the logic, for example deciding which code to run on the server-side 25 and which on the client-side 30, creating proxies on the client-side 30 for callable server-side functions, serializing and deserializing data, and other related activities.

On the server side 25, a developer's JavaScript environment is enhanced by the server-framework 60, which provides access to the database (e.g., MySQL), file system, network, the HTTP Request and Response data, and the external server-side platforms such as Java, PHP, and Ruby.

An example of code written by a developer and prior to processing by the present invention is set forth below.

<html>
<head>
<title>Tasks</title>
<style>
body { font: 9pt Arial; float: left; }
.tasks {background-color: #f0f0ff; padding: 8px;}
.new-task {Padding-bottom: 8px;}
.task { Padding: 4px; }
</style>
<script type=”text/javascript” runat=”server”>
Var sql =“CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS tasks ( “ +
“ id int (11) NOT NULL,” +
“description varchar (255),”+
“created datetime NOT NULL” +
“) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
Aptana.DB.execute(sql);
Window.onserverload = function( )
{
var resultSet = Aptana.DB.execute(“SELECT * FROM
tasks ORDER BY created”);
for (var i=0; i<resultSet.rows.length; i++)
{
var task = resultSet.rows[i];
addTask(task.description, task.id);
}
}
function saveTask(id, description)
{
var resultSet = Aptana.DB.execute(“SELECT * FROM tasks
WHERE id = ?”, [id]);
if (resultSet.rows.length > 0) // task already exists
{
Aptana.DB.execute(“UPDATE tasks SET description =?
WHERE id =?”,
[description, id]);
}
else // insert new task
{
Aptana.DB.execute(“INSERT INTO tasks (id, description,
created) ” +
“VALUES (?, ?, NOW( ))”,
[id, description]);
}
}
saveTask.proxy = true;
function $(id) { return document.getElementById(id); }
$.runat = “both”;
function addTask(description, id)
{
var newId = id ∥ Math.ceil(1000000000 * Math.random( ));
var div = document.createElement(“div”);
div.id = “task_” + newId;
div.className = “task”;
var checkbox = document.createElement(“input”);
checkbox.setAttribute(“type”, “checkbox”);
checkbox.setAttribute(“title”, “done”);
checkbox.setAttribute(“id”, “checkbox_” + newId);
Aptana.setEvent(checkbox, “onclick”, “completeTask
(“ + newId +”)”);
div.appendChild(checkbox);
var input = document.createElement(“input”);
input.setAttribute(“type”, “text”);
input.setAttribute(“size”, “60”);
input.setAttribute(“title”, “description”);
input.setAttribute(“id”, “input_” + newId);
input.setAttribute(“value”, description);
Aptana.setEvent(input, “onchange”, “saveTask(“ + newId +”,
this.value)”);
div.appendChild(input);
$(“tasks”).insertBefore(div, $(“tasks”).firstChild);
if (!Aptana.isOnServer)
{
saveTask(newId, description);
}
}
addTask.runat = “both”;
function completeTask(taskId)
{
var div = $(“task_” + taskId);
div.parentNode.removeChild(div);
deleteSavedTask(taskId);
}
completeTask.runat =“client”;
function deleteSavedTask(id)
{
Aptana.DB.execute(“DELETE FROM tasks WHERE id = ?”, [id]);
}
deleteSavedTask.proxy = true;
</script>
</head>
<body>
<h2>Tasks To Do</h2>
<div><i>Any changes should be automatically saved to your
database! </i><br/><br/></div>
<div class=“new-task”>
New:
<input type=“text” id=“txt_new” size=“60”>
<input type=“button” value=“add”
onclick=“addTask($(‘txt_new’).value)”>
</div>
<div id=“tasks” class=“tasks”>
</div>
</body>
</html>

Processing of the code by the present invention results in the code being formatted as set forth below:

<html>

• • <head>
    • <script src=“/aptanagramework.js?version=0.1.1.759” type=“text/javascript”></script>

<script type=“text/javascript”>Aptana.clientData=Aptana.Serialization.fromJSONString(‘{ }’);</script>

<script type=“text/javascript”>Aptana.Callback.id=−1407728339;</script>

<title>Tasks</title>

<style>

• • body {
    • font: 9pt Arial;
    • float: left;
  • }
  • .tasks {
    • background-color: #f0f0ff;
    • padding: 8px;
  • }
  • .new-task {
    • padding-bottom: 8px;
  • }
  • .task {
    • padding: 4px;
  • }

</style>

<script type=“text/javascript”>

• • function $(id)
  • {
    • return document.getElementById(id);
  • }
  • function addTask(description, id)
  • {
    • var newId=id∥Math.ceil(1000000000*Math.random( ));
    • var div=document.createElement(“div”);
    • div.id=“task_”+newId;
    • div.className=“task”;
    • var checkbox=document.createElement(“input”);
    • checkbox.setAttribute(“type”, “checkbox”);
    • checkbox.setAttribute(“title”, “done”);
    • checkbox.setAttribute(“id”, “checkbox_”+newId);
    • Aptana.setEvent(checkbox, “onclick”, “completeTask(“+newId+”)”);
    • div.appendChild(checkbox);
    • var input=document.createElement(“input”);
    • input.setAttribute(“type”, “text”);
    • input.setAttribute(“size”, “60”);
    • input.setAttribute(“title”, “description”);
    • input.setAttribute(“id”, “input_”+newId);
    • input.setAttribute(“value”, description);
    • Aptana.setEvent(input, “onchange”, “saveTask(“+newId+”, this.value)”);
    • div.appendChild(input);
    • $(“tasks”).insertBefore(div, $(“tasks”).firstChild);
    • if (!Aptana.isOnServer)
    • {
      • saveTask(newId, description);
    • }
  • }
  • function completeTask(taskId)
  • {
    • var div=$(“task_”+taskId);
    • div.parentNode.removeChild(div);
    • deleteSavedTask(taskId);
  • }
  • function saveTask( )
  • {
    • return Aptana.Callback.invokeFunction.call(null, “saveTask”, arguments);
  • }
  • function saveTaskAsync(callback)
  • {
    • return Aptana.Callback.invokeFunctionAsync.call(null, callback, “saveTask”, arguments);
  • }
  • function deleteSavedTask( )
  • {
    • return Aptana.Callback.invokeFunction.call(null, “deleteSavedTask”, arguments);
  • }
  • function deleteSavedTaskAsync(callback)
  • {
    • return Aptana.Callback.invokeFunctionAsync.call(null, callback, “deleteSavedTask”, arguments);
  • }

</script>

</head>

<body>

• • <h2>Tasks To Do</h2>
  • <div>
    • <i>Any changes should be automatically saved to your database!</i>
    • <br>
    • <br>
  • </div>
  • <div class=“new-task”>
    • New:<input id=“txt_new” size=“60” type=“text”><input value=“add” onclick=“addTask($(‘txt_new’).value)” type=“button”>
  • </div><div id=“tasks” class=“tasks”></div></body></html>

FIG. 6 is a screen display 99 of the code set forth above.

As shown in FIG. 7, a server-computer 2000 contains server architecture 50. The server-architecture 50 includes the server-core 55 and the server-framework 60. The server-core 55 includes a JavaScript parser 95. The server-computer 2000 is preferably a conventional server-computer available from IBM, HP, APPLE, DELL, and SUN.

As shown in FIG. 7A, a user-computer 2002 contains a Web-browser 65. The Web-browser 65 preferably includes the client framework 70, client-side JavaScript code 75 and the rendering engine 80. The user-computer 2002 is preferably a conventional user-computer such as a PC available from HP, DELL, and GATEWAY, or a MAC available from APPLE. The Web-browser 65 is preferably MICROSOFT INTERNET EXPLORER, NETSCAPE, APPLE SAFARI, MOZILLA FIREFOX, or OPERA.

A general method 100 of the present invention is shown in FIG. 8. At block 102, an HTTP GET-request for a HTML document is received on the server-side 25. At block 104, the server-core 55 processes the HTML document and sends a plurality of events to the server framework 60. At block 106, the server framework 60 acts on the plurality of events from the server-core 55 using a plurality of event handlers. At block 108, a response to the original HTTP GET-request is sent to the client-side 30.

A more specific method 200 of the present invention is shown in FIG. 9. At block 202, an HTTP GET-request for a HTML document is received on the server-side 25. At block 204, the server-core encounters a <script> tag in the HTML document during processing of the HTML document. At block 206, the server-core creates a DOM node corresponding to the <script> tag. At block 208, the server-core 55 notifies the server framework 60 that a new HTML element event has occurred for the HTML document. At block 210, the server-framework 60 inspects the data associated with the event to determine if the tag was a script element. At block 212, the server-framework 60 directs the server core 55 pertaining to processing the script element. At block 214, a response to the original HTTP GET-request is sent to the client-side 30.

EXAMPLE

An example of how to create a simple, one-page Ajax-style application to keep track of a list of tasks is set forth below. A user creates new tasks, checks off and deletes existing tasks, and all the data persists and is preferably accessible from any browser. The functionality in this example is extremely simple to focus on the basics (e.g. no logging in step). Those skilled in the pertinent art can use one of the many popular Ajax libraries, such as jQuery, ext, Dojo, or YUI, (all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties) in building the applications, this simple tutorial assumes no specific Ajax library use, and only

To begin, one creates a client-side web page such as set forth below which contains several exemplary tasks.

<html>

• • <head>
    • <script src=“/aptanagramework.js?version=0.1.1.759” type=“text/javascript”></script>

<script type=“text/javascript”>Aptana.clientData=Aptana.Serialization.fromJSONString(‘{ }’);</script>

<script type=“text/javascript”>Aptana.Callback.id=−1407728339;</script>

<title>Tasks</title>

<style>

• • body {
    • font: 9pt Arial;
    • float: left;
  • }
  • .tasks {
    • background-color: #fOfOff;
    • padding: 8px;
  • }
  • .new-task {
    • padding-bottom: 8px;
  • }
  • .task {
    • padding: 4px;
  • }

</style>

<script type=“text/javascript”>

• • function $(id)
  • {
    • return document.getElementById(id);
  • }
  • function addTask(description, id)
  • {
    • var newId=id∥Math.ceil(1000000000*Math.random( ));
    • var div=document.createElement(“div”);
    • div.id=“task_”+newId;
    • div.className=“task”;
    • var checkbox=document.createElement(“input”);
    • checkbox.setAttribute(“type”, “checkbox”);
    • checkbox.setAttribute(“title”, “done”);
    • checkbox.setAttribute(“id”, “checkbox_”+newId);
    • Aptana.setEvent(checkbox, “onclick”, “completeTask(“+newId+”)”);
    • div.appendChild(checkbox);
    • var input=document.createElement(“input”);
    • input.setAttribute(“type”, “text”);
    • input.setAttribute(“size”, “60”);
    • input.setAttribute(“title”, “description”);
    • input.setAttribute(“id”, “input_”+newId);
    • input.setAttribute(“value”, description);
    • Aptana.setEvent(input, “onchange”, “saveTask(“+newId+”, this.value)”);
    • div.appendChild(input);
    • $(“tasks”).insertBefore(div, $(“tasks”).firstChild);
    • if (!Aptana.isOnServer)
    • {
      • saveTask(newId, description);
    • }
  • }
  • function completeTask(taskId)
  • {
    • var div=$(“task_”+taskId);
    • div.parentNode.removeChild(div);
    • deleteSavedTask(taskId);
  • }
  • function saveTask( )
  • {
    • return Aptana.Callback.invokeFunction.call(null, “saveTask”, arguments);
  • }
  • function saveTaskAsync(callback)
  • {
    • return Aptana.Callback.invokeFunctionAsync.call(null, callback, “saveTask”, arguments);
  • }
  • function deleteSavedTask( )
  • {
    • return Aptana.Callback.invokeFunction.call(null, “deleteSavedTask”, arguments);
  • }
  • function deleteSavedTaskAsync(callback)
  • {
    • return Aptana.Callback.invokeFunctionAsync.call(null, callback, “deleteSavedTask”, arguments);
  • }

</script>

</head>

<body>

• • <h2>Tasks To Do</h2>
  • <div>
    • <i>Any changes should be automatically saved to your database!</i>
    • <br>
    • <br>
  • </div>
  • <div class=“new-task”>
    • New:<input id=“txt_new” size=“60” type=“text”><input value=“add” onclick=“addTask($(‘txt_new’).value)” type=“button”>
  • </div><div id=“tasks” class=“tasks”></div></body></html>

In order to add formatting to the client page, a style block is added at the bottom of the <head> section as shown below.

<style>

• • body{
    • font: 9pt Arial;
    • float: left;
  • }
  • .tasks {
    • background-color: #f0f0ff;
    • padding: 8px
  • }
  • .new-task {
    • padding-bottom: 8px;
  • }
  • .task {
    • padding:4px;
  • }</style>

The web page does not yet have functionality. In order to provide functionality, the sample data is deleted and event handlers and JavaScript are added to the HTML page.

To add client-side script to the HTML page, a helper function is first added to ease DOM access. The script block shown in below is added to the <head> element.

<script type=“text/javascript”>

function $(id) {return document.getElementById(id);}

</script>

When a user types a description into the top textbox and clicks add, a new task line is created at the top of the list.

Next, an onclick event handler is added to a button to grab the value of the textbox and call a JavaScript function that adds the task, as shown below.

<input type=“button” value=“add”

onclick=“addTask ($(‘txt_new’).value)”>

Next, as shown below, the rows of sample data are removed from the HTML page. The new function addTask(description, id) inserts the new task into the DOM. For future use, the id is specified or auto-generated. This is added to the above <script> block.

function addTask(description, id)

{

var newId=id∥Mathc.ceil (1000000000*Math.random( ));

var div=document.createElement (“div”);

div.id=“task_”+newId;

div.className=“task”;

var checkbox=document.createElement (“input”);

checkbox.setAttribute (“type”, “checkbox”);

checkbox.setAttribute (“title”, “done”);

• • checkbox.setAttribute (“id”, “checkbox_”+newId);
  • div.appendChild (checkbox);
  • var input=document.createElement(“input”);
  • input.setAttribute (“type”, “text”);
  • input.setAttribute(“size”, “60”);
  • input.setAttribute(“title”, “description”);
  • input.setAttribute(“id”, “input_”+newId);
  • input.setAttribute(“value”, description);
  • div.apendChild(input);
  • $(“tasks”).insertBefore(div, $(“tasks”).firstChild);}

The addTask above uses pure DOM manipulation. Alternatively, one could create the HTML as a string or copy a hidden HTML block (acting as a template) and convert it into the new HTML fragment. Alternatively, one would use an Ajax library to achieve the same result quickly.

The application now has some basic functionality. Now the last bit of functionality is added when a task is checked off as done, which makes it disappear from the list. Another function is added to the script block, completeTask(taskId), to delete the task and its contents from the DOM, and add a line to addTask that adds a call to completeTask from the checkbox's onclick handler as shown below.

<script type=“text/javascript”>

function $(id) {return document.getElementById(id);}

function addTask(description)

{

var newId=id∥Math.ceil (1000000000*Math.random( ));

var div=document.createElement (“div”);

div.id=“task_”+newId;

div.className=“task”;

var checkbox=document.createElement (“input”);

checkbox.setAttribute (“type”, “checkbox”);

checkbox.setAttribute(“title”, “done”);

• • checkbox.setAttribute(“id”, “checkbox_”+newId);
  • Aptana.setEvent (checkbox, “onclick”, “completeTask (“+newId+”)”);
  • div.appendChild (checkbox);
  • var input=document.createElement(“input”);
  • input.setAttribute (“type”, “text”);
  • input.setAttribute(“size”, “60”);
  • input.setAttribute(“title”, “description”);
  • input.setAttribute(“id”, “input_”+newId);
  • input.setAttribute(“value”, description);
  • div.apendChild(input);
  • $(“tasks”).insertBefore(div, $(“tasks”).firstChild);}

function completeTask (tasked)

{

• • var div=$(“task_”+tasked);

div.parentNode.removeChild (div);

}

</script>

Now it is possible to add tasks, complete the tasks, delete the tasks, and modify descriptions of the tasks. However, one cannot save or retrieve data yet. To add the onclick event handler programmatically to the checkbox, the Aptana.setEvent(domElement, eventName, handler) function is used. There are multiple ways to add event handlers to a DOM element programmatically. An addTask is necessary to work both server-side and client-side. On the server-side, the event handler is added to the DOM, changing the HTML that's then sent to the client. If one would have used checkbox.onclick=“completeTask(“+newId+”)” that would have added the event handler without changing the DOM, so the handler would not have made it to the client. The Aptana.setEvent function “does the right thing” on both server and client, modifying the DOM on the former and directly setting the onclick property of the checkbox on the latter. With the present invention, only DOM modifications make it from the server-side to the client-side.

From the foregoing it is believed that those skilled in the pertinent art will recognize the meritorious advancement of this invention and will readily understand that while the present invention has been described in association with a preferred embodiment thereof, and other embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings, numerous changes modification and substitutions of equivalents may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention which is intended to be unlimited by the foregoing except as may appear in the following appended claim. Therefore, the embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined in the following appended claims.

Claims

1. A server system having a processor and a memory, and comprising: a core browser engine written in a native language for parsing an HTML document that includes at least one of a server script for execution by a server and a proxy script including a proxied function, for interpreting at least one of the server script and the proxy script, and for creating a Document Object Model (“DOM”) corresponding to the HTML document, wherein the core browser engine is executed on a server computer coupled to a client computer over a network;a server framework component written in an extensible interpreted language different from the language of the core browser engine, the framework component comprising a plurality of registered event handlers for performing the business logic of the server system and for modifying the DOM corresponding to the HTML document by at least one of loading external content into the HTML document in response to executing the server script, removing the server script from the HTML document, and replacing in the proxy script the proxied function with a proxy; anda bridge component functionally coupled between the core browser engine and the server framework component configured to send events to the server framework component during defined moments of processing the HTML document by the core browser engine, the events comprising data relevant to the processing of the HTML document, wherein the HTML document is rendered through a web browser executed on the client computer.

2. The server system of claim 1 wherein the HTML document further includes a callback script comprising a callback function and wherein the framework is configured for saving the callback function, which is retrieved and executed when the framework receives a callback request.

3. The server system of claim 1 wherein the server framework further determines if a script has an attribute indicating whether or not the script is to be run on the server.

4. The server system of claim 1 wherein the native language comprises C/C++, and the extensible interpreted language comprises JavaScript.

5. A system comprising: a web-server system executed on a server computer of a networked computer system, the web-server system comprising: a HTTP request server,a handler component in communication with the HTTP request server,a JavaScript server architecture in communication with the handler component, the JavaScript server architecture comprising: a core browser engine written in a native language excluding JavaScript or a similar extensible programming a e for parsing an HTML document comprising a server script for execution by a server, and a proxy script including a proxied function, for interpreting the server script and the proxy script, and for creating a DOM corresponding to the HTML document,a server framework component written in JavaScript or the similar extensible programming language, the framework component comprising a plurality of registered event handlers for performing the business logic of the JavaScript server architecture, and for modifying the DOM corresponding to the HTML document by at least one of loading external content into the HTML document in response to executing the at least one server script, removing the server script from the HTML document, and replacing in the proxy script the proxied function with a proxy, anda bridge component functionally coupled between the core browser engine and the server framework component configured to send events to the server framework component during defined moments of processing the HTML document by the core browser engine, the events comprising data relevant to the processing of the HTML document, wherein the HTML document is rendered through a web browser executed on a client computer coupled to the server computer.

6. The system of claim 5 wherein the HTML document further includes a callback script comprising a callback function and wherein the framework is configured for saving the callback function, which is retrieved and executed when the framework receives a callback request.

7. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium with an executable computer program product, which when executed by a server performs a method comprising: parsing, by a core, an HTML document comprising at least one of a server script for execution by a server and a proxy script including a proxied function, wherein the core is written in a native language different from JavaScript or a similar extensible language;interpreting, by the core, at least one of the server script and the proxy script;creating a DOM corresponding to the HTML document; andmodifying, by a framework written in JavaScript or the similar extensible language, the DOM corresponding to the HTML document by at least one of loading external content into the HTML document in response to executing the at least one server script, removing the server script from the HTML document, and replacing in the proxy script the proxied function with a proxy after notifying through a bridge component functionally coupled between the core framework events encountered during defined moments of processing the HTML document by the core browser engine, the events comprising data relevant to the processing of the HTML document.

8. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 7 wherein the HTML document further includes a callback script comprising a callback function and wherein the computer program product further performs saving the callback function, which is retrieved and executed when the server framework component receives a callback request.

9. A method for processing a HTML page on a server, the method comprising: encountering by a core of a JavaScript architecture an HTML document comprising at least one of a server script for execution by a server and a proxy script including a proxied function, wherein the core is written in a native language excluding JavaScript or a similar extensible programming language;creating a DOM corresponding to the HTML document;configuring the core to send events to a framework of the JavaScript architecture during defined moments of processing the HTML document by the core, the events comprising data relevant to the processing of the HTML document wherein the framework is written in JavaScript or the similar extensible programming language;notifying the framework that an event has occurred through a bridge component functionally coupled between the core browser engine and the server framework component;inspecting the HTML document by the framework; andmodifying, by the framework, the DOM corresponding to the HTML document by at least one of loading external content into the HTML document in response to executing the at least one server script, removing the server script from the HTML document, and replacing in the proxy script the proxied function with a proxy.

10. The method according to claim 9 wherein: encountering the HTML document comprises encountering a <script> tag in the HTML document.

11. The method according to claim 10 wherein creating a DOM corresponding to the HTML document comprises creating a DOM node corresponding to the <script> tag of the HTML document.

12. The method according to claim 11 wherein notifying a framework of the JavaScript architecture that an event has occurred comprises notifying a framework of the JavaScript architecture that a new HTML element event has occurred.

13. The method according to claim 12 wherein inspecting the HTML document by the framework comprising inspecting an associated data of the new HTML element to determine if the tag was a script element.

14. The method according to claim 13 further comprising directing the core pertaining to processing the script element.

15. The method according to claim 13 further comprising directing the core to not process the script element.

16. The method of claim 9 wherein the HTML document further includes a callback script comprising a callback function, the method further including saving the callback function, which is retrieved and executed when the framework receives a callback request.