This invention claims priority from PCT Application Serial No. PCT/EP2012/067294 filed Sep. 5, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to a method of manufacturing a flexible grinding product and a flexible grinding product produced by the method.
Conventional flexible grinding products have a layer of paper, plastic or fabric carrying abrasive particles such as aluminum oxide or silicon carbide. The grinding or abrasive particles are applied to one surface of the product utilizing a binding agent. The flexible grinding product is for instance suitable to be mounted onto a rotating or oscillating plate of a grinding machine.
One reason for deterioration of the grinding performance is due to blocking as abrasive dust tends to clog the grinding surface of the product.
An improvement of the durability of the grinding product by reducing the above clogging effect was achieved with a grinding product described in EP 0 779 851 A1. The grinding product comprises a cloth of woven or knitted fabric having projecting loops or thread parts. A grinding agent is applied as separate agglomerates to the surface of the grinding product. The expression “separate agglomerate” means that the grinding product does not comprise a continuous grinding or binding agent layer that would cover the surface of the cloth, but instead the grinding agent forms small point or line shaped accumulations. Thus the cloth has and maintains an open structure which allows to remove the grinding dust from the surface.
In the above-mentioned prior art, the grinding agent is applied onto the irregular surface of projecting threads or loops. This has the consequence that a non-uniform grinding result due to an irregular height-distribution of the grinding particles cannot be excluded, at least in critical applications. A very flexible impregnation and coating alleviates the surface failures but reduces the performance of the grinding product.
Further, it is difficult to calibrate the product using the back surface as a support in order to achieve a flattened or smooth grinding surface. This is particularly the case when the back surface of the cloth is irregular, possibly carrying threads or loops for attaching the grinding product to a grinding tool, and/or when the back surface is at least partly fixed by an impregnation.
An object of the invention is to provide a grinding product and a method for manufacturing the same with improved grinding performance and excellent durability.
The object is solved with a method according to claim 1 and a flexible grinding product having the features of claim 14. The dependent claims define preferred embodiments.
In a first step, an open cloth of knitted or woven fabric is prepared. Preferred fabrics forming the basis of the grinding product are defined in ISO 8388 and comprise weft-knitted jersey-based fabrics, weft-knitted double layer jersey-based fabrics, weft-knitted rib-based fabrics, weft-knitted purl-based fabrics, warp-knitted jersey-based fabrics, warp-knitted double layer jersey-based fabrics, warp-knitted rib-based fabrics, warp-knitted purl-based fabrics, combined warp- and weft-knitted jersey-based fabrics and others. Here, it is important that the cloth is a so-called “open cloth”, i.e. the cloth contains open spaces or regions defined for instance by loops or meshes. The open structure of the cloth allows removing grinding dust from the surface of the grinding product. The grinding dust can, for instance, be removed via evacuation from the backside of the grinding product.
In a second step, a coating is applied to one surface of the cloth. In the following, the surface carrying the coating is called grinding surface or front surface. The application of the coating is such that the coated surface of the cloth has one or more flat areas. In other words, the irregular grinding surface of the cloth defined by more or less protruding loops or threads etc. is not maintained unprocessed. Instead, the height-distribution is modified by the coating and/or the process of applying the coating such that one or more flat or plane areas are generated. The resulting cloth has a flattened front surface. Preferably, the coating is a polymer.
In a third step, a grinding agent is applied to the coated surface of the cloth. If necessary, an adhesive agent is used for adhering the grinding agent to the grinding surface.
The flexible grinding product as prepared above contains a network of channels and/or openings defined by fully or partially coated threads of the cloth. Due to the above-defined coating, plane portions carrying grinding agent are achieved without considerably impairing the open structure of the product. Thus, even though the flexible grinding product according to the invention utilized an open cloth, well-controlled and uniform grinding results are achievable. Further, the open cloth provided with controlled and flattened surface portions allows for very precise coatings like low or controlled make coat levels, intricate formations deposition and different print coating methods. Moreover, a very flexible impregnation and coating with minimal tendency to surface failures with excellent performance of the grinding product is achieved.
Preferably, the above second step contains at least two sub-steps. In a first sub-step, the coating is applied to the grinding surface of the cloth. In a second sub-step, at least a part of the coated surface is flattened by pressing the grinding surface against a working surface of a smoothing element, such as a plate, belt, film or drum. Large quantities of the flexible grinding product can thus be manufactured in a highly productive manner. When pressing the grinding surface against the smoothing element, a curing-step of the coating can be performed at the same time as discussed in more detail further below. Applying the coating and flattening the grinding surface via a smoothing element can be performed simultaneously or subsequently. In other words, the order of the two sub-steps of the second step is not particularly restricted. For instance, the smoothing element may carry the coating and apply the coating when pressing the grinding surface of the product against the working surface of the plate or drum. All kinds of pressure-less and low pressure coating and printing methods, such as kiss roller, gravure roller and screen printing that do not fill the openings in the cloth can be used. It is as well possible to apply the coating beforehand, for instance via dipping the cloth into the coating or spraying the coating onto the grinding surface or printing the coating onto the surface. When using a smoothing drum, large or even endless sheets of cloth can efficiently be treated.
Preferably, the working surface of the smoothing element is provided with a structural pattern, for instance made of grooves and/or dimples for producing a pattern of plateaus in the coated surface. Printing or engraving a well-defined three-dimensional pattern into the grinding surface can be performed with regard to the uncoated cloth, the coated cloth or by simultaneously coating the cloth. It is for instance possible to press the cloth against a working surface of an engraved roller to create an engraved surface structure having protruding flat plateaus. Sometimes it is desired to have a three dimensional structure of isolated islands of flat plateaus in order to achieve a desired grinding result. In this respect, not only the coating but also the grinding agent is applied preferably discontinuously, for example in the shape of separate small islands. Further, when introducing artificial depressions or grooves into the cloth, well-defined channels are generated for evacuation of the grinding dust. In this respect, preferably, the engraved pattern is a regular or periodic pattern of grooves or depressions.
It is preferable that the coating is applied or calendered in a soft or fluid state. The viscosity can for instance be increased with heat. In this case, the coating can easily be applied with a well-defined thickness. It is preferable that the coating does not fully penetrate the cloth. When applying a coating with a certain viscosity, it may become necessary to cure the coating. This is achieved preferably via UV-radiation or other radiation. In this case, flattening the grinding surface via a smoothing element and curing the coating or performing part of the curing process can be achieved simultaneously or almost simultaneously. It is for instance possible to press the surface of the cloth against the working surface of the smoothing element while irradiating UV-light from the opposite side. The beams penetrate the cloth and reach the coating at the interface between grinding product and drum or plate. Alternatively, cooling or heating the coating is as well possible, in case the coating includes a thermosetting or a thermoplastic material. Curing or forming via heat or cooling can efficiently be achieved via a heated or cooled drum provided behind or downstream the smoothing element. Also the heated or cooled drum may have a desired structural pattern in its surface as to be transferred to the grinding surface of the product.
After curing, the coated surface of the cloth is preferably provided with an adhesive agent in order to support application and adhesion of the grinding agent which is to be applied. In this respect, it is preferable to apply the grinding agent or grinding particles via a kiss drum or via some other pressure-less of low-pressure method. When applying the grinding agent, it is thus preferable not to degrade the flattened, patterned structure of the grinding surface. Preferably, only flattened areas or plateaus are provided with grinding particles. The level difference between the higher plateaus and the lower depressions allows for a selective coating of only the higher plateaus. The generated grooves or channels as well as the openings of the fabric shall not be clogged with grinding particles. Preferably, the grinding particles or grinding agent contain abrasive particles such as aluminum oxide or silicon carbide, also more special particles such as diamond, boron nitride and engineered grains can be used. The flattened surface of the cloth is not only superior in view of the grinding result but also in view of the actual process of applying the grinding particles. The structured surface has plane surface elements following the knitted or woven structure of the product. The product can be provided with grinding particles in a well-defined manner.
Preferably flattening the coated grinding surface of the cloth includes a step of sanding the surface. A sanding step may be applied to further define or to define in first place the flattened structure. Sanding the grinding surface is useful in view of adjusting the size of the flattened areas as well as whether and how the flattened islands or areas are connected with each other. Here, a belt sander can be used, a drum sander, an oscillating sanding beam, combinations thereof or one or more other suitable sanding units. There may be used a calibrating roller or flat pad nip or the cloth can be pressed against the sanding unit by the actual web tension and certain angle of enlacement. There may as well be used combinations thereof.
Preferably, the cloth of knitted or woven fabric is impregnated before applying the coating. The impregnation helps preparing the cloth for accepting the coating. The impregnation stabilizes the structure of the fabric. Preferably, the impregnation agent is a resin (or a different) with a filler and may be based on latex to give a desired flexibility and elasticity.
Preferably, the cloth is provided with projecting loops and/or threads situated on the surface opposite to the grinding surface, wherein the projecting loops and/or threads originate from the threads of the cloth and wherein the projecting loops and/or threads are substantially free of the coating. The projecting loops and/or threads may serve as fastening means for mounting and holding the grinding product to a grinding tool. The loops and/or threads may serve as one part of a hook-and-loop fastener. In a preferred alternative, the flexible grinding product is laminated with foam onto a respective surface of the tool and the foam may further be laminated with a velour on the opposite side for fastening. Preferably, the flexible grinding product is provided with a foam and/or a velour on the side which is intended to be fastened to a respective surface of a grinding tool.
Preferably, the coating is or includes a polymer. The coating may be based on standard Oligomer and monomer-based acrylic formulations, water-dilutable acrylates, dual cure formulations, as well as Polyurethane-dispersions or similar materials. Further, also UV-curable epoxides and vinylmonomers are suitable materials. However acrylic oligomer/monomer-based formulations are preferred.
In the following, a tool or machine for coating and flattening a flexible grinding product is described. The tool comprises a coating agent applying unit for applying a coating agent to the grinding surface of the cloth, a smoothing and pressing unit, wherein the smoothing and pressing unit has a smoothing drum and is constructed and arranged so that the grinding surface of the cloth is pressed against the smoothing roll for flattening at least portions of the grinding surface, and a curing unit for curing the coating. It is possible that the coating agent applying unit and the smoothing and pressing unit are realized in one single unit allowing for simultaneously applying the coating agent and flattening the cloth.
According to one embodiment, the tool further comprises a grinding agent applying unit for applying a grinding agent to the grinding surface of the cloth.
Preferably, the tool further comprises a radiation source for curing the coating agent. Preferably, the radiation source is positioned opposite to the smoothing drum such that the radiation penetrates the cloth and the coated cloth is smoothened and cured simultaneously.
Preferably, the radiation for curing the coating agent is ultraviolet radiation.
Preferably, the tool further comprises means for transporting the cloth from the coating agent applying unit to the smoothing and pressing unit, if applicable, and for transporting the layer of knitted fabric from the smoothing and pressing unit to the grinding agent applying unit, if applicable.
Further advantages and aspects of the present invention are provided in the following description of particular embodiments. The above and below described features may be taken alone but may as well be taken in combination as long as they do not contradict each other. The following description has to be taken in consideration of the enclosed figures. In the figures, similar features carry the same reference sign.
The cloth is provided with a coating and it is flattened such that a sine-type plateau-structure 100 is generated as shown in
Smoothing drum 10 is illustrated in
The smoothing drum 10 serves for flattening the coated cloth C. The result is a coated but still open cloth C having flat portions as for instance illustrated in
Thereafter or at the time of pressing the cloth C against the working surface of the smoothing drum 10, the coating is cured via UV-radiation originating from the UV-light source 40. Optionally, a second UV-light source 41 can be provided, or more, in case curing in more than one stages is required or desired. Depending on the coating agent, curing via heat or cooling is as well conceivable. It is as well possible to place one or more UV-light sources on the smoothed side of the cloth.
In order to achieve a zig-zag-pattern or sine-pattern as shown in
Alternative tools and processes for applying a coating to the grinding surface of the cloth and for flattening the surface are shown in
For simplicity,
For simplicity,
In another example, the basic cloth is based on a warp-knitted mesh fabric according to ISO 8388 3.5.46 as shown in
An embodiment illustrating the above mentioned projecting loops is shown in
For sanding the product, a belt sander can be used, a drum sander, an oscillating sanding beam, combinations thereof or one or more other suitable sanding units. There may be used a calibrating roller or flat pad nip or the cloth can be pressed against the sanding unit by the actual web tension and certain angle of enlacement. There may as well be used combinations thereof.
The pattern of plateaus can be achieved via different methods. For instance, the smoothing drum may carry a corresponding pattern, which then is transferred onto the surface of the fabric. Alternatively, after sanding or flattening the grinding surface of the cloth, the surface can be coated in an additional step with an engraved drum or roller, for instance with grooves in horizontal directions. As a third alternative, the illustrated plateaus 100 may as well be created with a screen-print-device. According to a fourth alternative, the coated, flattened and/or sanded surface of the cloth may be provided with an adhesive agent or make coat. The applied make coat may be structured via an engraved drum. Alternatively, a screen-print-device may be used for applying the make coat. Typically, the difference of level between the plateaus and the depressions when applying the fourth alternative is smaller than what is achievable via the first, second or third alternative because the amount of make coat is limited by abrasive coating demands.
The coating of the grinding particles can be made in different ways, the coating can comprise a separate make coat that bonds the separately coated grinding particles. The coating can alternatively comprise a slurry of bonding agent and grinding particles and this slurry can be coated into a layer as such, but the layer may subsequently be formed to sanding formations on the flattened surfaces in a desired pattern and shape of formations. The slurry may also be transferred by a roller, belt or film with the engraved desired pattern and may further be formed and cured while in contact with the transferring element.
A cross section through line C-C in
Overcoated portions 102′ are flattened or smoothed. In
Turning to the composition of the coating, polymers are preferred. The coating may be based on standard Oligomer and monomer-based acrylic formulations, water-dilutable acrylates, dual cure formulations, as well as Polyurethane-dispersions or similar materials. Further, also UV-curable epoxides and vinylmonomers are suitable materials. However acrylic oligomer/monomer-based formulations are preferred.
As an example, a formulation can consist of 20 wt % Bisphenol A Epoxy diacrylate, 5 wt % (1,6)-Hexanedioldiacrylate, 15 wt % Tricyclodecanedimethanol Diacrylate, 60 wt % Trimethylolpropane Triacrylate.
As alternatives also other combinations may be used which include other types of Epoxy acrylates, Polyester, Melamin, Polyurethane or Polyether acrylates.
To achieve suitable viscosity ranges some of the reactive thinners or monomers may as well partially be substituted by low viscous oligomer types such as aliphatic epoxy acrylates, e.g. CN152 from Sartomer.
Alternative monomers may include materials such as 2(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethyl acrylate, Isobornyl acrylate, Tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate, 2-Phenoxyethyl acrylate, (1,6)-Hexanedioldiacrylate, Tripropylene glycol diacrylate, Dipropylene glycol diacrylate, Pentaerythritol Tetraacrylate, Di-Pentaerythritol Pentaacrylate, as well as other acrylate or methacrylate monomers. Suitable materials can also be for example other radically polymerizable vinylmonomers, like N-vinylcaprolactam.
The amount and type of filler that is used in the coating strongly influences on the final performance of the cured material. In order to modify the properties of the coating different kind of fillers can be used whereas also various combinations of filler materials may be applied. In case of UV-curable coating formulations one needs to assure that the filler is sufficiently penetrable for UV-light in order to ensure curing of the formulation. If, however, EB post-curing is applied during or after the coating step, the filler may also be impenetrable to UV-light. In this case UV-curing is applied in order to preliminary cure the material and fix surface shape and structure whereas the full mechanical properties are reached after EB-post-curing.
For fillers powders having small particle sizes below 10 μm are preferred. However coarser particles may be used as well, if applicable. Fillers may as well be used as blends in order to fine-tune the mechanical parameters of the coating. Examples for suitable fillers are Talc which is the preferred filler for this coating or Aluminumtrihydroxide as an example of an UV-penetrable filler material. Further on Kaolin, Calcium sulfate or fillers which are similar or identical to abrasive particles based on aluminumoxide, siliconcarbide and the like may be used. With increasing hardness of the filler material the coating will typically show a more brittle behavior towards tear and strain.
The initiator system used in the formulation is dependent on the resin system that is used. For a typical radically curing acrylic formulation mixtures of several initiators may be used, depending on the type of UV-lamp, line speed and if EB-postcuring is applied.
For a typical formulation with UV pre-curing and EB post-curing e.g. 5 wt % Benzophenone 1-hydroxy-cyclohexylphenyl-ketone mixture (Additol BCPK from Cytec) in combination with an amine acrylate (7 wt %) (Ebecryl 7100) or an amine synergist for instance a tertiary amine (Ebecryl P116) may be used. Other initiators and combinations e.g. MAPO, BAPO, thioxanthones and combinations thereof may be more suitable in some cases, for example when good through cure is required, typically in combination with only UV-curing hardening.
Other initiator types and combinations such as Iodonium-, Sulphonium and other derivates and e.g. anthracence-based derivates of sensitizers or the like may be applicable in case of acid-catalyzed hardening systems or if e.g. UV-LED curing is applied.
Blending of the resins requires no special attention except to assure that all components are homogenously blended within the mixture. Depending on the mixing equipment, the UV-resin may be blended first and the filler is added to the resin, though also the opposite order can be applied.
The choice of the type of monomer, oligomer and filler combination as well as their ratios strongly depend on the mechanical properties which are required or desired during the further process, e.g. as to the treatment the material such as winding or cutting. Mechanically, the coating needs to be capable of achieving sufficient tension and tear resistance as well as a sufficient flexibility for handling the material during the process.
In terms of applying the coating to a cloth, the UV-curing resin formulation with filler is blended as previously described. Initiators are required in case UV-curing is applied as a curing method.
According to one embodiment, it has shown to be practical to spread the resin/filler mixture by using a doctor roller on an even plastic film substrate, e.g. a PET film. Coating thickness of the resin blend hereby depends on the thickness of the cloth that shall be coated. Preferably coating thicknesses for the coating on the film substrate are between 50 and 800 μm, more preferably a thicknesses of approximately 300 μm is provided. Subsequently, the film which is coated with the uncured resin mixture is bent around a roller of suitable size and pressed against the cloth. The coated cloth is then moved under a UV-radiation source and cured, preferably from the backside of the cloth. It is possible to provide an even or calendered film with a surface pattern to be transferred into the grinding surface of the product.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/067294 | 9/5/2012 | WO | 00 | 6/22/2015 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/037034 | 3/13/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1561727 | Kingman | Nov 1925 | A |
2740239 | Ball | Apr 1956 | A |
2778169 | Ball | Jan 1957 | A |
2984052 | Mueller, Jr. | May 1961 | A |
3276852 | Lemelson | Oct 1966 | A |
4227350 | Fitzer | Oct 1980 | A |
4282011 | Terpay | Aug 1981 | A |
4386943 | Gumbel | Jun 1983 | A |
4826508 | Schwartz et al. | May 1989 | A |
4867760 | Yarbrough | Sep 1989 | A |
4874478 | Ishak et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4925457 | deKok | May 1990 | A |
5066312 | Ishak et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5131924 | Wiand | Jul 1992 | A |
5203881 | Wiand | Apr 1993 | A |
5578343 | Gaeta et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5674122 | Krech | Oct 1997 | A |
5679067 | Johnson | Oct 1997 | A |
5681612 | Benedict et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5700188 | Uhlmann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5975988 | Christianson | Nov 1999 | A |
6024634 | Hoglund et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6383064 | Eggert | May 2002 | B1 |
6613113 | Minick et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6634929 | Visser | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6923840 | Schutz et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7258705 | Woo et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7285146 | Peterson | Oct 2007 | B2 |
8057287 | Chao et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8206202 | Hoglund | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8216030 | Hoglund | Jul 2012 | B2 |
9950408 | Palushaj | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20020019199 | Goers | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030022604 | Annen | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030121212 | Minick | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030143938 | Braunschweig | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030207659 | Annen | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040018802 | Welygan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040148866 | Krupnick | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040235406 | Duescher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050020190 | Schutz et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050118939 | Duescher | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130568 | Welygan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060156634 | Welygan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060280908 | Hoglund | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070037500 | Minick | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070066186 | Annen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070243802 | Petersen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080155904 | Peterson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080160087 | Peterson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080160879 | Peterson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090229188 | Hoglund | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090277098 | Spies | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100003904 | Duescher | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100075578 | Chou et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100130113 | Hoglund | May 2010 | A1 |
20110159794 | Chung-Fat | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120045977 | Hoglund | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120094587 | Hoglund | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120322352 | Petersen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20150183090 | Hsu | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2806123 | Feb 2012 | CA |
87106418 | Mar 1988 | CN |
1077722 | Oct 1993 | CN |
20111245 | Aug 2001 | DE |
0451944 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0779851 | May 1998 | EP |
1733844 | Apr 2009 | EP |
1522386 | May 2011 | EP |
2390056 | Nov 2011 | EP |
50-11118 | Jan 1975 | JP |
5474587 | Nov 1977 | JP |
61-244468 | Oct 1986 | JP |
05229071 | Mar 1990 | JP |
63-283868 | May 1990 | JP |
03117565 | Dec 1991 | JP |
06-155314 | Jun 1994 | JP |
2001-1272 | Jan 2001 | JP |
3657612 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006-159343 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-289592 | Oct 2006 | JP |
3953099 | May 2007 | JP |
2009-502541 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-508701 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2012-210683 | Nov 2012 | JP |
3182351 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2014-018869 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2385799 | Dec 2007 | RU |
2006120377 | Dec 2007 | RU |
2011087653 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO2011087653 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2014037034 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Foreign Office Action dated May 9, 2016; 11 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150343605 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |