This patent generally relates to insulated doors and, more specifically, to doors that include a flexible panel such as an insulated curtain.
Cold storage rooms are refrigerated areas in a building that are commonly used for storing perishable foods. Cold storage rooms are typically large enough for forklifts and other material handling equipment to enter. Access to the room is often through a power actuated insulated door that separates the room from the rest of the building. To minimize thermal losses when someone enters or leaves the room, the door preferably opens and closes as quickly as possible.
Vertically operating roll-up doors and similar doors with flexible curtains are perhaps some of the fastest operating doors available. When such a door opens, its curtain usually bends upon traveling from its closed position in front of the doorway to its open position on an overhead storage track or take-up roller.
Such bending is not a problem if the curtain is relatively thin. However, an insulated curtain may not bend as well due to the required thickness of the insulation. When a take-up roller or curved track bends a thick curtain, relative translation may occur between opposite faces of the curtain. Designing a thick, insulated curtain that can accommodate such translation can be challenging.
Moreover, if an insulated curtain becomes temporarily creased or locally compressed along the horizontal line where the curtain bends, such a crease or compression might trap a pocket of air inside the curtain, and that trapped air might cause the curtain to bulge and adversely affect the door's operation.
Certain examples are shown in the above-identified figures and described in detail below. In describing these examples, like or identical reference numbers are used to identify the same or similar elements. The figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features and certain views of the figures may be shown exaggerated in scale or in schematic for clarity and/or conciseness. Additionally, several examples have been described throughout this specification. Any features from any example may be included with, a replacement for, or otherwise combined with other features from other examples.
With the exception of door panel 12 itself, the structure, operation and other details of door 10 are described and illustrated in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2008/0110580 A1, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Generally, a powered drive sprocket 18 (
Publication No. US 2008/0110580 A1 also explains the benefit of equipping an insulated door panel with an evacuation blower. However, unlike that published application, the example apparatus described herein enables the door panel 12 to be advantageously utilized without such a blower and associated hardware.
Instead of using an evacuation blower, door panel 12 includes a plurality of pliable baffles 26 that restrict the redistribution of air contained between a first sheet 28 and a second sheet 30 of door panel 12. Sheets 28 and 30 are joined and generally sealed along their outer perimeter to create one large overall air chamber 32 between sheets 28 and 30. Baffles 26 divide chamber 32 into a plurality of more manageable smaller chambers 34. For illustrative clarity, baffles 26 and chambers 32 and 34 are shown in
While the division of large chamber 32 into smaller, more manageable chambers 34 helps solve the problems caused by air trapped in door panel 12, baffles 26 used for this purpose may have other desirable properties. For example, baffles 26 may be sufficiently flexible to accommodate some relative translation between sheets 28 and 30 as door panel 12 bends over mandrel 16. The flexibility of baffles 26 may also enable door panel 12 to restorably break away if something were to accidentally collide with the door. Additionally or alternatively, baffles 26 may be sufficiently flexible to conformingly mate with the lateral edges or vertical seams 33 of sheets 28 and 30 so that there is minimal leakage or air exchange between chambers 34. Further, in some examples, baffles 26 preferably are sufficiently stiff to maintain a desired spacing between sheets 28 and 30, particularly in examples where insulation is not used for maintaining such spacing. Further yet, in some examples, baffles 26 preferably have a thermal conductivity that generally is less than or equal to that of sheets 28 and 30. The R-value of air enhanced with insulation in chambers 34 may be sufficient for reducing or even preventing frost from forming on door panel 12. However, if baffles 26 have relatively high thermal conductivity, frost lines might form on sheet 28 or 30 where baffles 26 connect to those sheets.
Although the actual construction of door panel 12 may vary, the illustrated examples have sheets 28 and 30 being made of any suitable polymeric or natural fabric material that is preferably pliable and can be joined along their outer perimeter by adhesion, tape, melting/fusing/welding, sewing, hook-and-loop fastener, snaps, rivets, zipper, etc. Substantially the entire outer perimeter, including seams 33 and the upper and lower edges of door panel 12, is preferably sealed to reduce or even prevent appreciable amounts of air from flowing in and out of chamber 32. Inhibiting moist air from repeatedly entering chamber 32 reduces or even prevents mold-promoting moisture from condensing inside chamber 32 on a panel sheet that is facing, for example, a cold storage room.
Baffles 26 can be made of a material similar to or different than that of sheets 28 and 30. The flexibility of sheets 28 and 30 enables door panel 12 to bend over mandrel 16, while the flexibility of baffles 26 enables limited relative translation between sheets 28 and 30 as door 10 opens and closes. As door 10 opens or closes and door panel 12 travels and bends across mandrel 16, this action urges relative vertical translation between sheets 28 and 30. Thermal insulation or thermal insulation pad(s) 38, such as porous foam pads or polyester mats, preferably is installed within chambers 34.
For the illustrated examples, baffles 26 are horizontally elongate, which enable them to not only restrict vertical airflow within door panel 12 but also to accommodate relative vertical translation between sheets 28 and 30. In other examples, door panel 12 is provided with vertically elongate baffles or a combination of vertical and horizontal baffles.
To effectively restrict airflow within door panel 12, horizontally elongate baffles 26 preferably extend along at least most of the full width 40 of door panel 12. To facilitate manufacturing, however, baffles 26 can be made slightly shorter than the panel's full width 40 to make it easier to join the lateral vertical edges of sheets 28 and 30 together. Baffles 26 being a little shorter than full width 40 of door panel 12 places the plurality of air chambers 34 in fluid communication with each other. Thus, as door 10 opens and door panel 12 travels across mandrel 16, some air within door panel 12 will be temporarily redistributed to at least one of the lower chambers (e.g., air chamber 34′) of the plurality of chambers 34, thereby slightly increasing the air pressure within chamber 34′ temporarily, but not really detrimentally.
Although door panel 12 could be manufactured by several different methods,
An outer perimeter of sheet 28 is fused, sewn or otherwise connected to sheet 30 as schematically depicted by the block at reference number 46 of
As noted above, a requirement for a door providing access to a cold storage room is that the door reduces and preferably minimizes thermal loss, thereby also reducing or preventing the formation of condensation on the door. This requirement can be met by providing a door that opens and closes very quickly to reduce and preferably minimize thermal loss when a person enters or exits the cold storage room and a door that is well-insulated to reduce or even prevent thermal loss (and condensation formation) when the door is closed. However, these solutions (a fast operating door and a well-insulated door) typically have characteristics that work against each other. For example, flexible, vertically-operating doors, or curtains, are some of the fastest operating doors available, but these doors, or curtains, typically must bend or curve (e.g., about a mandrel) as the door moves between its closed and opened positions. A well-insulated door is typically filled with thick, heavy insulation having a high R-value, but this type of insulation is difficult to move quickly, does not bend well, and may allow for air pockets to become trapped inside the curtain, or door. It is therefore desirable to provide a fast moving, flexible, vertically-operating door that provides an R-value sufficient to reduce or even prevent condensation from forming on the door, while still being able to bend and move without trapping significant amounts of air within the curtain, or door.
While using baffles 26 to divide a large chamber 32 into smaller, more manageable chambers 34 helps solve the problems caused by air trapped in a large door panel 12, utilizing smaller insulation pads 38 inside of these smaller, more manageable chambers 34 has its own challenges. For example, over time, thermal insulation pads 38 may begin to sag, or slouch, due to the effects of gravity and/or the repeated bending and flexing associated with the door opening and closing. When an insulation pad 38 sags, or slouches, as shown in
A method for reducing or even preventing an air gap, or pocket, from forming between adjacent insulation pads 38 may include packing, or jamming, oversized insulation pads 38 into chamber 34, wherein the insulation pads 38 are oversized by being taller than the nominal baffle spacing. While this method may be effective at reducing or even preventing air gaps from forming, it may be difficult to pack, or jam, a large, wide insulation pad 38 into a smaller chamber 34, and the forces exerted by the compressed insulation pad may make it difficult to assemble the door as shown in
An example of incorporating insulation pads 38 into chambers 34 is shown in
Adjacent baffles 126 define a nominal baffle spacing 190 that is smaller than an effective height 194 of the insulation pads 138, such that insulation pads 138 are packed into sheets 28 and 30 with insulation pads 138 overlapping each other, thereby reducing or even preventing the formation of air gaps, or pockets, and effectively reducing heat transfer through panel 112. The term nominal baffle spacing refers to the distance between the center of area, or geometric center, of a first baffle to the center of area, or geometric center, of a second, adjacent baffle. The nominal baffle spacing 90′ may not be equal throughout the door panel. The effective height 194 of insulation pad 138 is the distance between the uppermost point of the insulation pad and the lowermost point of the insulation pad.
Baffles 226 lying at an angle enables the pads of insulation 238 to be shaped such that adjacent pads of insulation 238 overlap each other, which helps reduce or even prevent the formation of air gaps and further reduces heat transfer through door panel 212 (thereby reducing or even preventing the formation of condensation on sheet 28 or 30).
The exact non-perpendicular angular orientation of the baffles relative to the sheets 28 and 30 of the door is not critical, as long as the angle enables adjacent insulation pads to overlap to reduce heat transfer through the door panel and reduce and/or prevent the formation of condensation on sheet 28 or 30.
The cross-sectional shape of baffles 426 enables the insulation pads 438 to be shaped such that pads of insulation 438 overlap each other, which further reduces heat transfer through door panel 412 and helps to ensure that no low R-value air gaps exist.
At least some of the aforementioned examples include one or more features and/or benefits including, but not limited to, the following:
In some examples, a door panel is comprised of two pliable sheets with a plurality of pliable baffles therebetween, wherein the baffles are horizontally elongate to not only restrict airflow within the panel but also to accommodate relative vertical translation between the two sheets.
In some examples, the baffles are sufficiently flexible or pliable to enable the two sheets to pinch together as the panel bends over a mandrel.
In some examples, a door panel is comprised of two pliable, generally parallel sheets to create an overall air chamber. The panel also includes a plurality of baffles that divide the overall air chamber into a plurality of smaller, more manageable chambers.
In some examples, the smaller, more manageable chambers are in fluid communication with each other.
In some examples, the horizontal baffles do not extend the full width of the door panel so that the perimeter of the panel's outer sheets can be readily joined to each other.
In some examples, the horizontal baffles extend as wide as possible to reduce or preferably minimize fluid communication between the smaller chambers.
In some examples, the air pressure within the lower chamber temporarily increases as the door opens.
In some examples, the internal baffles are fused rather than sewn to the outer sheets for ease of manufacturing and to reduce or preferably minimize air leakage between the interior and exterior of the door panel.
Although certain example methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture have been described herein, the scope of the coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1421906 | Calef | Jul 1922 | A |
2113068 | McLaughlin, Jr. | Apr 1938 | A |
2342839 | Byers | Feb 1944 | A |
3017218 | Groth et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3036670 | Jewell | May 1962 | A |
3055379 | Fink | Sep 1962 | A |
3186896 | Clem | Jun 1965 | A |
3231006 | Fisher et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3544417 | Corzine | Dec 1970 | A |
3662410 | Lankheet | May 1972 | A |
3724526 | Huprich | Apr 1973 | A |
3856072 | Sund | Dec 1974 | A |
3975882 | Walter | Aug 1976 | A |
4040210 | Land | Jul 1977 | A |
4039019 | Hopper | Aug 1977 | A |
4070839 | Clem | Jan 1978 | A |
4115610 | Wortman | Sep 1978 | A |
4255907 | Lightell | Mar 1981 | A |
4294875 | Schramm | Oct 1981 | A |
4506720 | Iwanicki | Mar 1985 | A |
5016700 | Wegner et al. | May 1991 | A |
5249323 | Kikuchi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5544690 | Magro et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5586594 | Shapoff | Dec 1996 | A |
5664613 | Jelic | Sep 1997 | A |
5738161 | Martin | Apr 1998 | A |
5813172 | McNally | Sep 1998 | A |
5855235 | Colson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5915445 | Rauenbusch | Jun 1999 | A |
6001199 | Colson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6112797 | Colson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119758 | Coenraets | Sep 2000 | A |
6199337 | Colson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6354353 | Green et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6659158 | Laugenbach | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6688369 | Colson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6725898 | Mullet et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7059378 | Colson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7748169 | Cote | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7992678 | Pilaar | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8043690 | Hand et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20010005964 | Colson et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030041981 | Cramer, III | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20070277943 | Boerger et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080110580 | Hoerner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090139665 | Cha | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100132894 | Knutson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110289857 | Pilaar | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120018102 | Ungs et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120085504 | Cha | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130098567 | Ashelin et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2692316 | Apr 2005 | CN |
2722005 | Nov 1977 | DE |
0123508 | Oct 1984 | EP |
0358920 | Mar 1990 | EP |
3093791 | Oct 2000 | JP |
7805464 | Oct 1979 | NL |
1778263 | Nov 1992 | RU |
2571814 | Dec 2015 | RU |
9112404 | Aug 1991 | WO |
2011065933 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944, dated Nov. 2, 2010, 11 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US09/65554, dated Mar. 29, 2012, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US09/65554, dated Mar. 29, 2012, 7 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944, dated May 18, 2012, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US09/65554, dated Apr. 19, 2012, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944, dated Jul. 22, 2011, 6 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report” issued in connection with International application No. PCT/US2011/042947, dated Sep. 28, 2011, 3 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” issued in connection with application No. PCT/US2011/042947, dated Sep. 28, 2011, 5 pages. |
IP Australia, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Australian Patent Application No. 2009355386, dated Oct. 16, 2012 (3 pages). |
New Zealand Patent Office, “First Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 593206, dated Aug. 16, 2012, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944, dated Sep. 7, 2012, 8 pages. |
Advisory Action issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office dated Aug. 2, 2012 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944 (3 pages). |
First Official Action issued by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office dated May 22, 2012, in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,745,244 (3 pages). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's Answer,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944, dated Oct. 10, 2013, 11 pages. |
Mexico Patent Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Mexican Application No. MX/a/2011/005757, dated Oct. 4, 2013, and corresponding English translation, 7 pages. |
New Zealand Intellectual Property Office, “First Examination Report,” issued in connection with New Zealand Application No. 605738, dated Aug. 19, 2013, 2 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with European Application No. 11731231.4, dated Nov. 8, 2013, 5 pages. |
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944, dated Nov. 3, 2011, 9 pages. |
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory action”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944, dated Oct. 7, 2011, 3 pages. |
Australian Intellectual Property Office, “Certificate of Grant”, issued in connection with Australia patent No. 2009355386, dated Jan. 30, 2014, 1 page. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China “First Office action”, issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 200980150894.X, dated Dec. 23, 2013, 5 pages. |
Mexican Intellectual Property Office, “Office action”, issued in connection with Patent application No. MX/a/2011/005757, dated Feb. 13, 2014, 5 pages. |
New Zealand Intellectual Property Office, “Letters Patent”, issued in connection with New Zealand patent No. 593206, dated Mar. 4, 2014, 1 page. |
Australian Intellectual Property Office, “Patent Examination Report No. 1”, issued in connection with Australia patent No. 2011283144, dated Apr. 14, 2014, 4 pages. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice of Reasons for Rejection” issued in connection with corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. P2013-521792 dated Mar. 4, 2014 (4 pages). |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action”, in connection with Chinese patent application No. 200980150894.X, dated May 20, 2014,13 pages. |
Russian Intellectual Property Office, “Office action”, issued in connection with Russian patent application No. 2013103440, dated May 28, 2014, 8 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, “First Office action”, issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 201180036502.4, dated Jun. 11, 2014, 7 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Letters of Patent”, issued in connection with Canadian patent application No. 2,745,244, dated Jul. 15, 2014, 1 page. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with Japanese Patent application No. 2013-521792, dated Sep. 24, 2014. (English Translation not provided), 4 pages. |
Mexican Patent Office, “Office action”, issued in connection with mexican patent application No. MX/a/2011/005757, dated Sep. 8, 2014, 5 pages. |
Mexican Patent Office, “Office action”, issued in connection with Mexican patent application No. MX/a/2013/000678, dated May 28, 2015, 3 Pages. |
Australian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Acceptance”, issued in connection with Australian patent application No. 2011283144, dated Jun. 3, 2014, 1 page. |
European Patent Office, “Decision to grant a European patent pursuant to Article 97(1)EPC”, issued in connection with European patent application No. 11731231.4, dated Jul. 23, 2015, 2 pages. |
Chinese Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Completing Formalities for Patent Registration”, issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 200980150894.X, dated Sep. 23, 2015, 4 pages. |
Australian Patent Office, “Certificate of Grant”, issued in connection with Australian patent No. 2011283144, dated Oct. 1, 2015, 1 page. |
European Patent Office, “Intend to Grant”, issued in connection with European patent application No. 11 731 231.4-1604, dated Feb. 11, 2015, 35 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, “The Third Office action”, issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 200980150894.X, dated Apr. 10, 2015, 4 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Decision to revoke decision”, issued in connection with Chinese patent office action No. 200980150894.X, dated Apr. 2, 2015, 2 pages. ( English translation not provided). |
Mexican Patent Office, “Office Action”, issued in connection with Mexican patent office action No. MX/a/2011/005757, dated Mar. 19, 2015, 6 pages. |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand, “Letters Patent”, issued in connection with New Zealand patent No. 605738, dated May 1, 2015, 1 page. |
Russian Patent Office, “Substantive Examination”, issued in connection with Russian patent application No. 2013103440, dated Nov. 21, 2014, 9 pages. |
New Zealand Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Acceptance”, issued in connection with New Zealand patent application No. 605738, dated Jan. 28, 2015, 1 page. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC”, issued in connection with European patent application No. 11 731 231.4, dated Feb. 11, 2015, 35 pages. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Notice of Completing formalities for Patent Registration”, issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 201180036502.4, dated Mar. 5, 2015, 8 pages. |
New Zealand Intellectual Property Office, “Further Examination Report”, issued in connection with New Zealand patent application No. 605738, dated Nov. 21, 2014, 2 pages. |
Chinese Intellectual Property Office, “Decision of Rejection”, issued in connection with Chinese patent application No. 200980150894.X, dated Nov. 15, 2014, 13 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with canadian patent application No. 2,806,022, dated Nov. 27, 2014, 1 page. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Certificate of Patent”, issued in connection with Japanese patent application No. 2013-521792, dated Oct. 31, 2014, 2 pages. |
Mexican Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance”, issued in connection with Mexican patent application No. MX/a/2013/000678, dated Sep. 28, 2015, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944, dated Jun. 14, 2016, 25 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC”, issued in connection with European patent application No. 09 851 353.4, dated May 6, 2016, 6 pages. |
Mexican Industrial Property Institute, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/005757, dated Jan. 20, 2017, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision on Appeal”, issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944, dated Apr. 20, 2016, 10 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC,” issued in connection with European Application No. 09851353.4, dated May 25, 2012, 2 pages. |
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 200980150894.X, dated Dec. 23, 2013, and corresponding English translation, 11 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with Canadian Application No. 2,745,244, dated Jan. 2, 2014, 1 page. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Application No. 2,806,022, dated Jan. 6, 2014, 2 pages. |
Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with New Zealand Patent Application No. 593,206, dated Nov. 13, 2013, 1 page. |
Intellectual Property Office of Australia, “Notice of Acceptance,” issued in connection with corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2009355386, dated Oct. 4, 2013, 2 pages. |
PCT, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/042947, dated Feb. 7, 2013 (6 pages). |
USPTO, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,944, dated Feb. 21, 2013 (15 pages). |
CIPO, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 2,745,244, dated Mar. 14, 2013 (2 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120018102 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |