The invention relates generally to offshore oil load and discharge terminals and, more specifically, to hose leak detection systems deployed within the context of such oil load and discharge terminals.
In offshore oil load and discharge operations, there is a systematic risk of oil leakage to the sea from damage to single carcass submarine or floating oil suction and discharge hoses. As used herein, a “single carcass hose” is a hose construction comprising only one carcass layer. Leakage from a single carcass hose may occur from a precipitous hose failure or a failure that materializes over time. Hose failure may result from overpressure of the system, a puncture from outside, sudden tensile break of the hose body, defects in the manufacture, construction or design of the hose, etc. In a single carcass hose construction, hose failure results in immediate oil leakage to the environment surrounding the hose. Such leakage is highly undesirable for obvious environmental and economic reasons.
Because of the risk of failure inherent in single carcass hose construction, a “double carcass” hose construction has been proposed and developed by those in the industry. A double carcass hose construction utilizes an outer hose carcass confining an inner hose carcass as an added safeguard. The outer hose functions to hold any oil or fluid that leaks through the inner hose carcass for a certain designed period of time. In a typical double carcass construction, a hose includes a main pressure cord or carcass layer as a primary confinement and an outer, or auxiliary, pressure cord layer formed so as to sheathe the inner carcass. A buffering space is defined between the carcass layers to retain fluid that leaks from the inner carcass. In use, it is common to connect hoses end-to-end to form a hose line for transporting oil or other fluid under pressure. U.S. Pat. No. 5,244,016 discloses a hose representative of the state of the art double carcass construction.
A double carcass hose is generally produced and utilized in two different types: submarine or floating configurations, depending on the type of application and offshore oil load and discharge system. Submarine applications require that a hose extend in submerged fashion between two points whereas a floating application requires that the hose extend across the water surface. In either application, leakage from the hose results in the aforementioned undesirable consequences.
In order to minimize the damage resulting from an undetected leak, various leak detection systems have been proposed and adopted. Such systems generally employ leak detectors of various configurations, operable under varying principles, mounted at the nipple region of an underwater hose connection. U.S. Pat. No. 5,654,499 teaches a detector mounted to an end of a hose for detecting fluid upon contact between a sensing medium and the fluid. U.S. Pat. No. 4,465,105 teaches a pressure sensitive switch for detecting by means of measuring the pressure of leakage fluid between carcass layers. U.S. Pat. No. 5,714,681 discloses an electro-optical sensor that utilizes an infrared beam that senses fluid levels when the beam is deflected.
In general, in offshore oil transfer hose lines using double carcass hoses, there is a constant physical check of hose and leak detectors required because most leak detectors are mechanical devices. The existence of an oil leak must be manually or visually confirmed by checking each leak detector. Consequently, a constant monitoring of each hose line is required. Such monitoring activities may be done by the oil company itself or a contract service provider. The monitoring entity keeps records and files detailing monitoring activity and typically hand-writes such records “in-situ”. However, local conditions may make it difficult for the monitoring entity to annotate data observed. Operational conditions may further be such (e.g. high seas) that there is substantial danger to operational personnel and also a risk that incorrect data will be observed and collected by the monitoring agent.
Existing leak monitoring systems and devices, therefore, while working well under benign conditions, may fail to provide accurate monitored data under certain other conditions. The leak detection devices themselves may be electrically unsafe in that they have active or power components within the oil collection space, creating a fire or explosion risk. Secondly, the communication systems in existing systems provide, at times, unreliable communication between the sensing elements and remote receivers or visual observers. The positioning of the sensors may also be affected by the floating hose line torsion when deploying the hose line into the water. The sensors may also be positioned incorrectly during hose line segment assembly. Finally hose lines move as a result of seawater and weather conditions and such movement can cause sensor position change/failure, or cause erroneous data collection by the monitoring agent.
Additional deficiencies in existing art sensing systems are that they are relatively large, expensive to manufacture, cumbersome to deploy, and provide a less than satisfactory degree of reliability and flexibility. Available systems typically provide one means of communicating the leak status of a hose segment or coupling. Such systems may use a mechanical sensor that communicates visually, such as by means of a flashing LED to an on-site observer. Other systems may detect a leak and communicate by signal transmission to a remote receiver. In some applications the first, inspection based system may be preferable while in other applications a transmitter based communication may be preferable. No system affords a user the flexibility of alternatively deploying different communication devices at the preference or election of the user.
Accordingly, the industry is in need of a flexible leak detector and system that is reliable, safe, efficient, miniaturized, and cost effective to manufacture, deploy, and maintain. A desired system will accurately provide leak detection data despite rough operational conditions and minimize data collection and transmission failures. Ideally, the system will be capable of communicating the leak status within a hose reliably throughout a wide range of operational conditions.
The subject invention according to one aspect provides a flexible system for detecting leaks within a double carcass hose and communicating leak detection data/status by alternative means. Alternative leak detection devices may be deployed in the system. Pursuant to one aspect of the invention, a mechanical leak detector unit with a passive ID chip; or a leak detector incorporating an LED and a passive ID chip; or a telemetry leak detector unit may be employed depending on a user's preference and application conditions. The alternative leak detector units may, pursuant to another aspect of the invention, be interchangeably deployed within a universal casing. A user may accordingly readily replace a defective leak detector unit or replace one type of leak detector with another type of leak detector unit in situ as required or desired.
Pursuant to another aspect of the invention, a fluid leak detection system includes a hose line segment of the hose type comprising at least an inner carcass and an outer containment carcass separated from the inner carcass by a collection space; a housing defined by sidewalls externally mountable to the hose line segment and having an internal housing chamber in fluid communication with the collection space; a sensor casing mounted through a sensor housing sidewall; and a plurality of alternatively configured sensor units, each interchangeably coupling with the sensor casing. Each sensor unit detects the presence of fluid within the sensor housing and communicates the fluid status of the chamber.
According to another aspect of the invention, identification and leak status data is stored within the sensor unit and a mobile reader unit is employed to collect the data and download the data into a computer memory for subsequent transmission to remote terminals or to provide website data access.
Pursuant to another aspect of the invention, a method for detecting leaks in a double carcass hose includes affixing a fluid collection housing to the hose, the housing having sidewalls defining an internal housing chamber in fluid communication with the collection space; mounting a sensor casing through a sensor housing sidewall; selecting one from a plurality of alternatively configured sensor units, the plurality of sensor units each interchangeably coupling with the sensor casing; and coupling the selected one sensor unit to the sensor casing, the one sensor unit detecting the presence of fluid within the sensor housing chamber.
The invention will be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring initially to
A transmitter 30 may be mounted to the buoy 20 and communicate with the sensors in each hose segment 24. Data indicating the leak status of each hose segment is communicated to the transmitter and transmitted via satellite 32 to a central data processor/receiver 36 connected to antenna 34. The receiver 34 distributes the data to one or more decentralized remote terminal locations 38 so that the status of the hose lines 14, 22 may be monitored. Alternatively, or in conjunction with the data distribution to terminals 38, data relating to leaks may be downloaded into a main computer storage and website access provided thereto as will be explained.
With reference to
A forward pressure valve assembly 48 is disposed within a tubular rigid casing 50 of the casing assembly 40. The valve assembly 48 denies leaking fluid from the hose segment from accessing the leak detection assembly coupled to the casing 50 unless a prescribed pressure threshold is exceeded. The valve assembly 48 also prevents external water from migrating through the casing 50 and into the hose from the opposite direction. The casing 50 readily interchangeably couples with each variety of leak detection assembly 42, 44, 46 to meet the needs of the user as well as to facilitate replacement of malfunctioning detector components should the need arise.
With reference to
Extending forward from the board 64 are a pair of optical fiber connectors 66, 68. The circuit board 64 is of a type commonly available and includes a micro-radio frequency transmitter and a micro-ultrasonic transmitter (in the telemetry version of the sensor assembly as shown in
The detector assembly 44, as well as the other two detector assembly versions 42, 46, are interchangeable, each being configured for insertion into the casing 50. Casing 50 is formed of a rigid material, preferably steel. The casing 50 is generally tubular and elongate, and includes a forward smaller diameter forward nose portion 80, an intermediate external screw threaded portion 82, a transverse assembly bore 84 adjacent the threaded portion 82, and a rearward enlarged head portion 86. The head portion 86 is formed to provide LED portals 88 sized to admit and retain an LED 58 as best seen in
A cylindrical optics support 94 formed of preferably thermoplastic material is provided having a pair of rearwardly directed optics connector sockets 96, 98 and a transverse assembly bore extending therethrough. A pair of optics receiving passageways 102, 104 extend from a forward end of the support 94, through the support to respective sockets 96, 98. The passageways 102, 104 are sized to receive respective legs 108, 110 of optic fiber loop 106. The legs 108, 110 project through the support 94 to the sockets 96, 98. So located, the loop 106 projects forward from the support 94.
An actuator member 112 is formed as cylindrical body 114 having central body cavity 115. A pair of tines 116 project rearward from the periphery of the body 114. A pin projection 118 is axially disposed on the central axis of body 114 and projects rearward.
The pressure valve assembly 48 includes a generally tubular elongate body 120 formed of suitable material such as thermoplastic. The body 120 has a rearward enlarged cavity 122 dimensioned to receive the actuator body 114 therein. A forward elongate valve cavity 124 extends to an anterior chamber 126 at the forward end of the body 120. The valve cavity 124 communicates with the enlarged cavity 122 by means of relatively narrow passageway 128. External threaded portion 130 is located about the medial portion of body 120 and internal threaded surface 132 surrounds the anterior cavity 126. The cavity 124 is sized to seat first and second valve balls 134, 136 and a spring member 138 situated between the balls. An end retention screw 140 is provided and screws into the forward end of the body 120. The retention screw 140 has a small bore axial passageway 142 that extends into screw head 146, along the body of the screw to the cavity 124. The ball 136 seats against the internal opening of the passageway 142 and the ball 134 seats against the internal opening of the passageway 128. Spring 138 in compression nominally biases the balls 134, 136 against their respective openings with a preset level of force as will be explained below. An assembly pin 148 is further provided with a spacer sleeve 150 and a pin retainer 152.
Assembly of the optical version 44 of the leak detection assembly will be readily appreciated from
Casing assembly 40 is assembled by positioning the optical support body 94 within passageway 90, and securing the body 94 into position by the extension of pin 81 through the body transverse passage 100. The optical loop ends extend through passages 102, 104 respectively of the support body 94 to the sockets 96, 98. The actuation member 112 is inserted within the passage 90 and tines 114, 116 of the member 112 are positioned within the passageway 90 to abut body 94. The body 112 is received within chamber 122 of the pressure valve body 120 and pin projection 118 extends through passageway 128 to abut ball 134.
The assembled optical detector assembly 44 couples to the casing assembly 40 by screw threaded attachment. As forward end of the casing nose portion 70 reaches a terminal location within the casing 80, optical connectors 66, 68 align with and enter into sockets 96, 98 respectively of the optics support body 94. So situated, an optical signal may be generated by electronic circuitry of board 64 and transmitted through the optical fiber loop 106. The forward end of the casing nose portion 70, upon reaching the terminal location within casing 80, will contact the support body 94 and push the body 94 forward. Such forward movement will cause pin projection 118 to move forward and move valve ball 134 forward. Ball 134 will thus be unseated, opening the passageway 128 between chambers 122, 124. Valve ball 136 remains seated against the passageway 142 through screw 140.
If an oil leak occurs through a hose carcass, oil will move between the two carcasses until it reaches the assembly spring 140 and the pressure valve assembly 48. The pressure valve, by appropriate selection of screw 138, may be set to open at a low pressure, for example 90 psi. If the oil pressure exceeds the threshold, oil pressure will force ball 136 away from the internal opening of passageway 142 into an open position. Oil may then travel inside the cavity 124 through passageway 128 and cavity 122 to the internal chamber 115 of the body 112 wherein the optical loop 106 resides. Upon reaching the optical loop 106, the oil modifies the optical transmission properties of fiber. The electronic analysis of the optical transmission through the loop 106 determines an oil leak has occurred and the sensor starts the LED(s) 58. The occurrence and detection of a leak may further be stored as data within a passive RFID chip located on the board 56. Passive RFID chips, that is requiring no energy source to function, are commonly available electronic devices. At the appropriate time, data stored inside the RFID chip may be retrieved as explained below.
It will be appreciated that the sensor assembly 44 may be disconnected from the casing assembly 40 by threaded detachment. Upon disassociation of the sensor assembly 44 from the casing assembly 40, the spring 138 will release from compression to force ball 134 into sealing engagement with passageway 128. If the sensor assembly is in an underwater environment, water from outside of the sensor will thus be prevented from entering passageway 124 and proceeding therefrom out the forward end of passageway 142. The pressure valve assembly 48 accordingly operates to open to allow leaking oil to access the optical fiber 106 when a leak occur and to close whenever the leak detection assembly (42, 44, 46) is uncoupled from the casing assembly 40.
Operation of mechanical leak detector 42 proceeds similarly as with assembly 154 of
With reference to
During a hose line inspection, the inspector approximates the read head to the leak detector and the reader checks the RFID chip. The unit then reads and records the data stored in the RFID chip. The LED may be wired to flash to show the reading is completed. After the inspector finishes checking all sensors the data recorded in the reader may be downloaded into a computer system as part of the offshore hose line monitoring system. Such data may then be available through an internet or intranet website.
The telemetry leak detection assembly 46 may likewise be used in conjunction with the casing assembly 40 as will be appreciated from
With reference to
It will be noted that the sensor (42, 44, or 46) within casing assembly 40 is intended to protrude through the wall 224 of the housing 218. The sensor head portion 86 remains outside of the housing 218 as the sensor is affixed by means of screw threads 82 into a threaded aperture within wall 224. So positioned the transmission elements 57, 59 are outside of the mounting wall 224. The sensing element 42, 44, or 46 projects into the housing 224 and the optical fiber (or plural fibers) 106, within the casing assembly 40 resides within the housing 224. While one housing 224 and one sensor assembly 42, 44, 46/casing assembly 40 is shown in
Functionally, fluid leakage from the inner carcass 206 or water entering the hose as a result of a breach in the outer carcass 208, will migrate into the collection space 212, eventually reaching and entering the forward end of the sensor 42, 44, 46/casing assembly 40. The pressure valve assembly 48 will open when the pressure of the fluid against the valve assembly exceeds a pressure threshold. When the pressure valve assembly 48 opens, fluid will enter into the axial passageway through the casing assembly 40 until reaching the optical fiber loop(s) 106. At this location, the escaping oil, or water, will contact the fiber 106. Contact between the fiber outer coating and the fluid will alter the transmission properties carried by the fiber 106 and be interpreted by the optical electronics circuitry mounted on board 64 as a leak. In the event that a telemetry version of the leak detection sensor 46 is employed, the electronics will then initiate a change in communication signal to indicate a breach by means of the ultrasonic transmitter 57 and/or the RF transmitter 59. In the event that the optical leak detector 44 is employed, a visual indicator change at signaling LED 58 will occur. In the event that the mechanical leak detector 42 is deployed, the mechanical detector will change position and indicate the existence of a leak to the sensor reader 194.
It will be noted that the optical sensing element 106 is passive, and does not have or need an active energy supply, making the element 106 intrinsically safer when contacting oil than other forms of sensing devices. The wall 224 through which the sensor 42, 44, or 46 mounts thus functionally isolates the passive sensing element 106 from the battery powered analysis element 56 and transmission elements 57, 59. Moreover, the system is relatively light and occupies minimal space. The replacement of a malfunctioning sensor is readily facilitated by removing the end plate of the sensing unit. Substitution of one sensor type (42, 44, 46) for a different sensor type is also readily facilitated in like manner should a malfunction occur or the needs of the user change. The optical fiber operates as a contacting medium for detecting the presence of fluid and is a reliable means for detecting the presence and identity of fluid in the space 212. The analysis element 56 is powered by durable long duration battery 60. The element 56 operates continuously without need for a timer and functions preferably using artificial intelligence or neural network software. The transmission elements 57, 59 include built-in replaceable batteries and ID chips. When data is collected and transmitted, the identity of the sensor/hose segment is provided with the data to a remote receiver. Corrective action to repair the leaking hose can then be taken. The transmission elements 57, 59 work under magnetic principle with no electrical contacts.
Variations in the present invention are possible in light of the description of it provided herein. While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for the purpose of illustrating the subject invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in this art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the subject invention. It is, therefore, to be understood that changes can be made in the particular embodiments described which will be within the full intended scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2250496 | Postlethwaite | Jul 1941 | A |
2759175 | Spalding | Aug 1956 | A |
3299417 | Sibthorpe | Jan 1967 | A |
3800217 | Lowrance | Mar 1974 | A |
3834235 | Bouton et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3972223 | Torghele | Aug 1976 | A |
4153079 | Ambrose | May 1979 | A |
4259553 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4270049 | Tanaka et al. | May 1981 | A |
4286464 | Tauber et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4386269 | Murphy | May 1983 | A |
4446892 | Maxwell | May 1984 | A |
4465105 | Slater | Aug 1984 | A |
4509558 | Slater | Apr 1985 | A |
4630490 | Malicki | Dec 1986 | A |
4638132 | Miller | Jan 1987 | A |
4689484 | McMahon | Aug 1987 | A |
4749855 | Watanabe | Jun 1988 | A |
4764671 | Park | Aug 1988 | A |
4775855 | Cox | Oct 1988 | A |
4834497 | Angel | May 1989 | A |
4851817 | Brossia et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4922232 | Bosich | May 1990 | A |
4932257 | Webb | Jun 1990 | A |
4961069 | Tsaprazis | Oct 1990 | A |
5005005 | Brossia et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022045 | Elliott | Jun 1991 | A |
5058420 | Vali et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5090871 | Story et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5102012 | Foster | Apr 1992 | A |
5142914 | Kusakabe et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5176025 | Butts | Jan 1993 | A |
5187366 | Hopenfeld | Feb 1993 | A |
5200615 | Hopenfeld | Apr 1993 | A |
5244016 | Kuroda et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5265465 | Thomas | Nov 1993 | A |
5267670 | Foster | Dec 1993 | A |
5279157 | Mattis et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279332 | Winter et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5291032 | Vali et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305798 | Driver | Apr 1994 | A |
5323142 | Fain | Jun 1994 | A |
5343736 | Cady et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5394904 | Winter et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5399876 | LaClair | Mar 1995 | A |
5413146 | Kuroda et al. | May 1995 | A |
5427155 | Williams | Jun 1995 | A |
5452076 | Schopper et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5551484 | Charboneau | Sep 1996 | A |
5553971 | Osborne | Sep 1996 | A |
5590981 | Osborne | Jan 1997 | A |
5650564 | Wodeslavsky et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654499 | Manuli | Aug 1997 | A |
5714681 | Furness et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5775842 | Osborne | Jul 1998 | A |
5828798 | Hopenfeld | Oct 1998 | A |
5905194 | Strong | May 1999 | A |
6026862 | Friedrich et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032699 | Cochran et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6070617 | Honda et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6082392 | Watkins, Jr. | Jul 2000 | A |
6112580 | Hesky | Sep 2000 | A |
6116817 | Osborne | Sep 2000 | A |
6129107 | Jackson | Oct 2000 | A |
6149032 | Seitz | Nov 2000 | A |
6161591 | Winter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6305427 | Priest, II | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328074 | Wright et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330890 | Ekman | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6374863 | Friederich | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386237 | Chevalier et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6498991 | Phelan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6550499 | Pai | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6688338 | Meli et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7213611 | Flynn | May 2007 | B2 |
20020074042 | Olivas et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030234730 | Arms et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040154380 | Walker | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040177891 | Spaolonzi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050076955 | Boehland et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060122747 | Brown, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29608551 | Jul 1996 | DE |
19848015 | Apr 2000 | DE |
291041 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0 535 997 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 695 902 | Feb 1996 | EP |
1460408 | Sep 2004 | EP |
2 027 838 | Feb 1980 | GB |
2138917 | Oct 1984 | GB |
8-261861 | Oct 1996 | JP |
8261861 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10-61900 | Mar 1998 | JP |
11325378 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2004-239612 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004239612 | Aug 2004 | JP |
WO 9000698 | Jan 1990 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080011056 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |