The invention set forth in the appended claims relates generally to tissue treatment systems and more particularly, but without limitation, to debridement devices, systems, and methods suitable for assessing a tissue site for debridement.
Clinical studies and practice have shown that debridement of a tissue site can be highly beneficial for new tissue growth. Debridement may refer to a process for removing dead, damaged, or infected tissue from a tissue site for improving the healing potential of healthy tissue remaining at the tissue site. Adequate debridement or tissue removal may be essential to proper tissue site preparation, such as preparation of a wound bed, and facilitation of successful wound healing. However, the extent of required debridement or tissue removal to properly prepare a wound bed is not always obvious, especially to less experienced wound care clinicians. For example, if debridement and/or amputation of non-viable tissue are not performed to the correct margins, delays in healing may occur, and there may be a need for additional, expensive follow-up debridement and/or amputation procedures.
Therefore, improvements to debridement devices, systems, and methods that may assist clinicians with more accurately determining the extent of debridement required to remove non-viable tissue may be desirable.
New and useful systems, apparatuses, and methods for determining the extent of debridement necessary of a tissue site are set forth in the appended claims. Illustrative embodiments are also provided to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the claimed subject matter.
For example, in some embodiments, a dressing for treating a tissue site may include a drape, a sensing component, and a viability scale. The drape may include a pattern visible on a surface. The sensing component may be adapted to detect a presence of a tissue viability marker, and the viability scale may be adapted to indicate a level of tissue viability associated with the tissue viability marker.
In other embodiments, a dressing for treating a tissue site may include a drape, a sensing component, and a viability scale. The drape may be adapted to be placed proximate the tissue site and may comprise a tissue interface layer having an adhesive coating and a carrier layer comprising a film coated with an adhesive on a first surface and including a pattern visible on a second surface. The sensing component may be adhered to the tissue interface layer and may be adapted to detect a presence of a tissue viability marker. The viability scale may be applied to the carrier layer and may be adapted to indicate a level of tissue viability associated with the tissue viability marker.
In yet other example embodiments, a dressing for treating a tissue site may include a drape adapted to be placed proximate the tissue site, a sensing component, and a viability scale. The drape may comprise a tissue interface layer having an adhesive coating and a carrier layer comprising a film coated with an adhesive on a first surface and a pattern visible on a second surface, and may further include a plurality of perforations. The sensing component may be adhered to the second surface of the carrier layer and may be adapted to detect a presence of a tissue viability marker through the plurality of perforations. The viability scale may be applied to the carrier layer and adapted to indicate a level of tissue viability associated with the tissue viability marker.
Objectives, advantages, and a preferred mode of making and using the claimed subject matter may be understood best by reference to the accompanying drawings in conjunction with the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments.
The following description of example embodiments provides information that enables a person skilled in the art to make and use the subject matter set forth in the appended claims, but may omit certain details already well-known in the art. The following detailed description is, therefore, to be taken as illustrative and not limiting.
The example embodiments may also be described herein with reference to spatial relationships between various elements or to the spatial orientation of various elements depicted in the attached drawings. In general, such relationships or orientation assume a frame of reference consistent with or relative to a patient in a position to receive treatment. However, as should be recognized by those skilled in the art, this frame of reference is merely a descriptive expedient rather than a strict prescription.
Referring now to
As used herein, the terms “debride,” “debriding,” and “debridement,” relate to the act of removing or the removal of undesirable tissue, such as, eschar, necrotic, damaged, infected, contaminated, or adherent tissue, or foreign material from a tissue site. Several methods of debridement may be employed to treat a tissue site, such as a wound, having necrotic tissue, including surgical debridement, mechanical debridement, chemical or enzymatic debridement, and autolytic debridement.
Adequate debridement, or removal of necrotic tissue, is often essential to proper wound bed preparation and facilitation of successful wound healing. However, the extent of required debridement or tissue removal to properly prepare a wound bed is not always obvious, especially to wound care nurses and practitioners who may be less experienced. If debridement, and in some cases amputation, of non-viable tissue is not performed to the correct margins, healing of the tissue site may be delayed and additional, expensive follow-up debridement and/or amputation procedures may be required.
Non-viable, or necrotic, tissue is tissue that may be yellow or dark in color and typically does not have the vascular supply to deliver oxygen and nutrients to the tissue. This is usually why most clinicians debride necrotic tissue until the point where there is active tissue bleeding, as that is a sign of viable tissue. However, this may often result in additional trauma and pain for the patient, as well as lead to an increased area of damaged tissue at the tissue site that will ultimately require healing. Thus, there is a need for an easy-to-use means for identifying the areas of non-viable tissue at a tissue site. As disclosed herein, the drape 102 may address these outstanding needs and others. For example, the drape 102 may provide a flexible, low-tech, disposable means for identifying non-viable tissue and for determining the extent of debridement required to remove non-viable tissue when performing wound bed preparation or an amputation following necrosis, burns, failed skin grafts, or other tissue injuries.
In some embodiments, the drape 102 of
Referring to
In some embodiments, the tissue interface layer 104 may include a silicone gel adhesive having perforations 107, such as that currently available from Brightwake Ltd. or BlueStar. In some embodiments, the tissue interface layer 104 may include a perforated silicone gel adhesive in combination with an acrylic adhesive. Such a combination of adhesives may offer advantages of allowing the drape 102 to be applied to provide an effective pneumatic seal, but also allow the drape 102 to be repositioned if required and then held securely in place.
As previously discussed, the sensing component 106 may include a sensor, either a chemical or other form of sensing means, that may sense the presence of oxygen, or otherwise be capable of sensing the absolute partial pressure of the oxygen level, and thus indicate viable tissue areas. The sensing component 106 may distinguish viable from non-viable tissue areas via a color change or other change. In some embodiments, the sensing component 106 may include a composition of a layered silicate, a cationic surfactant, an organic colorant, and a reducing agent. For example, the composition may be an adapted or altered version of that referenced in U.S. Pat. No. 6,703,245. Other suitable compositions may be similar to oxygen-indicating tablets manufactured by Impak Corporation. Alternatively or additionally, the sensing component 106 may be comprised of solutions containing known laboratory-grade redox reaction dye indicators, such as Methylene Blue or AlamarBlue, which may be essentially clear in the absence of oxygen, but which turn blue when in the presence of oxygen. In such embodiments, the formulation may be adjusted or oxygen scavengers may be added to custom-tailor the amount or concentration of oxygen required for triggering a colorimetric response. The color change may be reversible with the addition of glucose (dextrose). In some embodiments, if alternative colors are desired for the color change, Phenosafranine may be used to provide a solution that will turn red when oxygen is introduced. Phenosafranine may also be mixed with Methylene Blue to form a solution that turns pink in the presence of oxygen. Some embodiments may also incorporate Indigo Carmine to form a solution that changes from yellow to green in the presence of oxygen. Alternatively or additionally, the use of Resazurin may create a solution that changes from pale blue to a purple-pink in the presence of oxygen. Other indicator sources may also be used, which may be oxygen-reactive materials, such as pressure-sensitive paints that show fluorescence quenching in the presence of increasing oxygen levels, or oxygen-sensitive dyes and pigments that are typically used as REDOX indicators, such as Methylene Blue from Sigma, N-phenylanthranilic acid from Acros Organics, or Neutral Red from Fischer Scientific.
In the example embodiment illustrated in
The carrier layer 108 may be positioned on an outer, non-wound-facing surface of the tissue interface layer 104. The carrier layer 108 may be formed of a film layer, such as a polyurethane, polyethylene, or other film material with similar characteristics and may be configured to minimize the exchange of oxygen through the material. The carrier layer 108 may be adhered to the tissue interface layer 104 by an acrylic-based adhesive. In some embodiments, the carrier layer 108 may be adhered to the tissue interface layer 104 with an acrylic-based adhesive that may pass through openings, such as perforations 107, in the tissue interface layer 104, and adhere to portions of tissue, such as a peri-wound area. In some embodiments in which the sensing component 106 may be integral to or applied to an outer surface of a carrier layer 108, the carrier layer 108 may include perforations, channels, communication ports, or may have increased permeability for allowing fluid communication between the tissue site and the sensing component 106.
In some embodiments, the drape 102 may also be used in conjunction with other layers or components as part of a larger dressing. For example, the drape 102 may be used with a manifolding or wicking bolster material layer, such as a foam or a non-woven material, for example, a compressed polyolefin material, available from Essentra, or a Libeltex co-polyester material. Further, the drape 102 may be used as part of a larger dressing with an absorbent core, such as Texsus 500 gsm superabsorbent material textile, which may capture fluids and store them for the duration of its application. In some of these embodiments, an additional perforated film layer may also be used between an absorbent core and a manifolding or wicking bolster material layer to prevent backflow of liquid from the absorbent core back into the manifolding or wicking bolster material layer.
The pattern 110 may be a system of shapes or a grid pattern made up of geometric shapes that are either pad printed, screen printed, or applied by other means directly onto an outer surface of the carrier layer 108. The pattern 110, in combination with the other components of the drape 102, may help convey to a clinician those areas of a tissue site that require resection or amputation. For example, portions of the pattern 110 may align with areas of the sensing component 106 that have undergone color changes. The pattern 110 may be particularly helpful when applied to tissue sites located on curved areas of the body. As shown in
Referring now to
In the example embodiment shown in
Referring now primarily to
A user, such as a clinician, may apply the drape 102, according to substantially the same principles as customary with most adhesive tissue drapes. For example, the drape 102 may be packaged with a protective adhesive layer (not shown) covering the wound-facing surface of the drape 102, with the wound-facing surface depending upon which specific types of layers are included in the particular embodiment of the drape 102. The protective release layer, such as an adhesive release layer, may be removed and the drape 102 may be applied to the tissue site 514. Ideally, following application, the drape 102 would cover any and all necrotic tissue 522, as well as a substantial border of viable tissue surrounding the necrotic tissue 522 at the tissue site 514. After placement of the drape 102 at the tissue site 514, any additional packaging material or layers, such as application tabs, a support film, or handling bars (not shown) may be removed.
Following application to the tissue site 514, the drape 102 may be left in place for a period of time in order to allow the sensing component, such as sensing component 106 of
The lines, squares, or circles that may be part of the pattern 110 on the carrier layer 108 of the drape 102 may provide visual indication as to the shape of the tissue site 514, as the drape 102 may be wrapped around curved body parts, such as appendages. As a result, the clinician may be provided with a simulated three-dimensional effect, such as a topographical map that the clinician can directly cut through for dissection of tissue at the tissue site 514. The clinician may use a sharp tool to cut through both the drape 102 and into the areas indicated for debridement by the sensing component 106 and pattern 110 of the drape 102. Thus, the drape 102 may directly serve as a debridement and/or amputation guidance tool for the clinician. Once the debridement or associated procedure has been achieved, any remaining portions of the drape 102 may be removed, and a wound dressing may be applied.
In addition to the embodiment(s) already discussed, the drape concept may be extended to include functionality to detect various alternative tissue viability markers. For example, as already mentioned, some embodiments of the drape 102 may be configured to sense alternative surrogate tissue respiration markers, such as the partial pressure of CO2 or pH levels. For sensing the partial pressure of CO2, some embodiments of the drape 102 may incorporate a color-changing media that changes from purple when exposed to ambient air (normally 0.04% CO2) to yellow when exposed to normal tissue (4% CO2). The CO2 or ammonia may be absorbed by the drape 102 and may show a color change as the pH drops with the absorption of CO2, or when the pH rises upon absorption of ammonia. In some further embodiments, alternative color-change assays may be incorporated, such as assays for organic enzymes whose levels may help quantify CO2 levels in tissue. Example organic enzymes may include carbonic anhydrase and adenylyl cyclases.
In some alternative embodiments, the drape 102 may be formulated to sense VEGF concentration. For example, the sensing component 106 of the drape 102 may include colorimetric or color-changing enzymes that change based on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentration. One example may include a horse-radish peroxidase combined with a specific antibody having an affinity for VEGF, which may change color from blue to yellow with increasing VEGF concentration. Additionally, some alternative embodiments may include a sensing component 106 that is formulated to sense alternative surrogate tissue respiration markers, such as nitric oxide (NO).
The drape concepts described above may also be used in multiple other scenarios. For example, a drape, such as drape 102, may be applied to a tissue site located downstream of a tourniquet, in order to monitor perfusion levels. In such examples, the drape 102 may be configured to include a sensing component that is responsive to pH level or any of the substances discussed herein, as well as any substance or compound related to cellular metabolism or respiration. Thus, a user, such as a medic or other health care provider, may assess and/or monitor the viability of tissue on the downstream side of the tourniquet, such as in situations where a tourniquet may be applied to stop or reduce excessive bleeding at a trauma site. Other applications for use of the drape may include various forms of traumatic injuries, due to exposure of a tissue site to explosions or firearm discharge, such as a fresh blast wound. In such cases of potential severe trauma, the pattern of the drape 102 in combination with the color-changing capability may help guide a caregiver to more accurately remove non-viable tissue. The helpful benefits of the drape 102 may continue during further levels of care, such as once a patient has been transported to a treatment facility, such as an operating room, which may be located in a different geographical region or on a different continent.
Also in addition to the embodiments already discussed, the drape concept may be extended to include a variety of alternative or additional structural components or layers, as well as different arrangements of the various components or layers. Any such additional embodiments may also seek to include a sensing component that is positioned within a sealed environment with a tissue site, while being isolated from the ambient environment.
The systems, apparatuses, and methods described herein may provide significant advantages, many of which have already been discussed. Generally, the drape embodiments may provide an easy-to-read, non-powered, and inexpensive means for clearly differentiating viable tissue from non-viable tissue, and therefore identifying portions of a tissue site in possible need of debridement. The drape embodiments also may offer particularly small and lightweight solutions, which allow them to be easily carried by a health care worker, such as in a medic bag for use outside of a clinical setting, without adding significant volume or mass. While in many instances, the drape embodiments would not require any additional means for a user to correctly identify any color changes, in some situations, a small LED flashlight, at most, may be helpful or necessary to view any color changes of the drape. In contrast, most current standard-of-care equipment is large and cumbersome to use, often requiring specific lighting conditions, calibration procedures, a processing computer, a display screen, and significant time between measurements, and therefore would not be practical for field use, such as in a combat or military setting.
The features of the drapes, such as the colorimetric viability scale and patterns on the drape which may form topographic contours in a third dimension when applied, may increase a clinician's ease-of-use when making determinations of the surface area as well as depth of debridement required at a tissue site. Additionally, the drape embodiments may provide clinicians having a wide variety of skill levels, as well as members of the general population, with an easy-to-apply solution that is a single, one-piece application that is contourable and adherent to the body, and which may be easily disposed of following removal. Other potential uses for the drape embodiments may relate to skin grafting, as following many skin grafting procedures, it is difficult to determine whether the grafted tissue is adequately perfused in order to survive. Thus, an embodiment of a drape, as described above, may be applied over a graft for monitoring the viability of the grafted tissue, particularly during the early critical periods following the procedures. Furthermore, the drape embodiments disclosed herein may be fully integrated into a negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system or topical oxygen therapy dressing systems.
While shown in a few illustrative embodiments, a person having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the systems, apparatuses, and methods described herein are susceptible to various changes and modifications. Moreover, descriptions of various alternatives using terms such as “or” do not require mutual exclusivity unless clearly required by the context, and the indefinite articles “a” or “an” do not limit the subject to a single instance unless clearly required by the context. Components may be also be combined or eliminated in various configurations for purposes of sale, manufacture, assembly, or use.
The appended claims set forth novel and inventive aspects of the subject matter described above, but the claims may also encompass additional subject matter not specifically recited in detail. For example, certain features, elements, or aspects may be omitted from the claims if not necessary to distinguish the novel and inventive features from what is already known to a person having ordinary skill in the art. Features, elements, and aspects described herein may also be combined or replaced by alternative features serving the same, equivalent, or similar purpose without departing from the scope of the invention defined by the appended claims.
The present invention claims the benefit, under 35 USC 119(e), of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/334,349, entitled “Flexible Means for Determining the Extent of Debridement Required to Remove Non-Viable Tissue”, filed May 10, 2016, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/334,979, entitled “Flexible Means for Determining the Extent of Debridement Required to Remove Non-Viable Tissue”, filed May 11, 2016, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1355846 | Rannells | Oct 1920 | A |
2547758 | Keeling | Apr 1951 | A |
2632443 | Lesher | Mar 1953 | A |
2682873 | Evans et al. | Jul 1954 | A |
2910763 | Lauterbach | Nov 1959 | A |
2969057 | Simmons | Jan 1961 | A |
3066672 | Crosby, Jr. et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3367332 | Groves | Feb 1968 | A |
3520300 | Flower, Jr. | Jul 1970 | A |
3568675 | Harvey | Mar 1971 | A |
3648692 | Wheeler | Mar 1972 | A |
3682180 | McFarlane | Aug 1972 | A |
3826254 | Mellor | Jul 1974 | A |
4080970 | Miller | Mar 1978 | A |
4096853 | Weigand | Jun 1978 | A |
4139004 | Gonzalez, Jr. | Feb 1979 | A |
4165748 | Johnson | Aug 1979 | A |
4184510 | Murry et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4233969 | Lock et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4245630 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4256109 | Nichols | Mar 1981 | A |
4261363 | Russo | Apr 1981 | A |
4275721 | Olson | Jun 1981 | A |
4284079 | Adair | Aug 1981 | A |
4297995 | Golub | Nov 1981 | A |
4333468 | Geist | Jun 1982 | A |
4373519 | Errede et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4382441 | Svedman | May 1983 | A |
4392853 | Muto | Jul 1983 | A |
4392858 | George et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4419097 | Rowland | Dec 1983 | A |
4465485 | Kashmer et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4475909 | Eisenberg | Oct 1984 | A |
4480638 | Schmid | Nov 1984 | A |
4525166 | Leclerc | Jun 1985 | A |
4525374 | Vaillancourt | Jun 1985 | A |
4540412 | Van Overloop | Sep 1985 | A |
4543100 | Brodsky | Sep 1985 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4551139 | Plaas et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4569348 | Hasslinger | Feb 1986 | A |
4605399 | Weston et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4608041 | Nielsen | Aug 1986 | A |
4640688 | Hauser | Feb 1987 | A |
4655754 | Richmond et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4664662 | Webster | May 1987 | A |
4710165 | McNeil et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4733659 | Edenbaum et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4743232 | Kruger | May 1988 | A |
4758220 | Sundblom et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4787888 | Fox | Nov 1988 | A |
4826494 | Richmond et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838883 | Matsuura | Jun 1989 | A |
4840187 | Brazier | Jun 1989 | A |
4863449 | Therriault et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872450 | Austad | Oct 1989 | A |
4878901 | Sachse | Nov 1989 | A |
4897081 | Poirier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4906233 | Moriuchi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4906240 | Reed et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919654 | Kalt | Apr 1990 | A |
4941882 | Ward et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953565 | Tachibana et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4969880 | Zamierowski | Nov 1990 | A |
4985019 | Michelson | Jan 1991 | A |
5000172 | Ward | Mar 1991 | A |
5037397 | Kalt et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5086170 | Luheshi et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092858 | Benson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100396 | Zamierowski | Mar 1992 | A |
5134994 | Say | Aug 1992 | A |
5149331 | Ferdman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5167613 | Karami et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176663 | Svedman et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5215522 | Page et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5232453 | Plass et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5261893 | Zamierowski | Nov 1993 | A |
5265605 | Afflerbach | Nov 1993 | A |
5278100 | Doan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279550 | Habib et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5298015 | Komatsuzaki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5342376 | Ruff | Aug 1994 | A |
5344415 | DeBusk et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358494 | Svedman | Oct 1994 | A |
5437622 | Carion | Aug 1995 | A |
5437651 | Todd et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5527293 | Zamierowski | Jun 1996 | A |
5549584 | Gross | Aug 1996 | A |
5556375 | Ewall | Sep 1996 | A |
5607388 | Ewall | Mar 1997 | A |
5636643 | Argenta et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645081 | Argenta et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5759570 | Arnold | Jun 1998 | A |
6071267 | Zamierowski | Jun 2000 | A |
6135116 | Vogel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6241747 | Ruff | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6287316 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6345623 | Heaton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6488643 | Tumey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493568 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6553998 | Heaton et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6814079 | Heaton et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
20020077661 | Saadat | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020115951 | Norstrem et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115954 | Worthley | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120185 | Johnson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143286 | Tumey | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20120059301 | Franklin | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120209232 | Barofsky | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
550575 | Mar 1986 | AU |
745271 | Mar 2002 | AU |
755496 | Dec 2002 | AU |
2005436 | Jun 1990 | CA |
26 40 413 | Mar 1978 | DE |
43 06 478 | Sep 1994 | DE |
29 504 378 | Sep 1995 | DE |
0100148 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0117632 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0161865 | Nov 1985 | EP |
0358302 | Mar 1990 | EP |
1018967 | Jul 2000 | EP |
692578 | Jun 1953 | GB |
2 195 255 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2 197 789 | Jun 1988 | GB |
2 220 357 | Jan 1990 | GB |
2 235 877 | Mar 1991 | GB |
2 329 127 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2 333 965 | Aug 1999 | GB |
4129536 | Aug 2008 | JP |
71559 | Apr 2002 | SG |
8002182 | Oct 1980 | WO |
8704626 | Aug 1987 | WO |
90010424 | Sep 1990 | WO |
93009727 | May 1993 | WO |
94020041 | Sep 1994 | WO |
9605873 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9718007 | May 1997 | WO |
9913793 | Mar 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to PCT/US2017/031886, dated Jul. 17, 2017. |
Louis C. Argenta, MD and Michael J. Morykwas, PHD; Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Clinical Experience; Annals of Plastic Surgery. |
Susan Mendez-Eatmen, RN; “When wounds Won't Heal” RN Jan. 1998, vol. 61 (1); Medical Economics Company, Inc., Montvale, NJ, USA; pp. 20-24. |
James H Blackburn II, MD et al.: Negative-Pressure Dressings as a Bolster for Skin Grafts; Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 40, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 453-457; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philidelphia, PA, USA. |
John Masters; “Reliable, Inexpensive and Simple Suction Dressings”; Letter to the Editor, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 198, vol. 51 (3), p. 267; Elsevier Science/The British Association of Plastic Surgeons, UK. |
S.E. Greer, et al. “The Use of Subatmospheric Pressure Dressing Therapy to Close Lymphocutaneous Fistulas of the Groin” British Journal of Plastic Surgery (2000), 53, pp. 484-487. |
George V. Letsou, MD., et al; “Stimulation of Adenylate Cyclase Activity in Cultured Endothelial Cells Subjected to Cyclic Stretch”; Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 31, 1990, pp. 634-639. |
Orringer, Jay, et al; “Management of Wounds in Patients with Complex Enterocutaneous Fistulas”; Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Jul. 1987, vol. 165, pp. 79-80. |
International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB95/01983; dated Nov. 23, 1995. |
PCT International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; dated Jan. 8, 1999. |
PCT Written Opinion; PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; dated Jun. 8, 1999. |
PCT International Examination and Search Report, PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; dated Jan. 15, 1998 & dated Apr. 29, 1997. |
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; dated Sep. 3, 1997. |
Dattilo, Philip P., Jr., et al; “Medical Textiles: Application of an Absorbable Barbed Bi-directional Surgical Suture”; Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, vol. 2, Issue 2, Spring 2002, pp. 1-5. |
Kostyuchenok, B.M., et al; “Vacuum Treatment in the Surgical Management of Purulent Wounds”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Sep. 1986, pp. 18-21 and 6 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu. A., et al; “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Purulent Lactation Mastitis”; Vestnik Khirurgi, May 14, 1986, pp. 66-70, and 9 page English translation thereof. |
Yusupov. Yu.N., et al; “Active Wound Drainage”, Vestnki Khirurgi, vol. 138, Issue 4, 1987, and 7 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu.A., et al; “Bacteriological and Cytological Assessment of Vacuum Therapy for Purulent Wounds”; Vestnik Khirugi, Oct. 1988, pp. 48-52, and 8 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu.A., et al; “Concepts for the Clinical-Biological Management of the Wound Process in the Treatment of Purulent Wounds by Means of Vacuum Therapy”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Jul. 7, 1980, pp. 132-136, and 8 page English translation thereof. |
Chariker, Mark E., M.D., et al; “Effective Management of incisional and cutaneous fistulae with closed suction wound drainage”; Contemporary Surgery, vol. 34, Jun. 1989, pp. 59-63. |
Egnell Minor, Instruction Book, First Edition, 300 7502, Feb. 1975, pp. 24. |
Egnell Minor: Addition to the Users Manual Concerning Overflow Protection—Concerns all Egnell Pumps, Feb. 3, 1983, pp. 2. |
Svedman, P.: “Irrigation Treatment of Leg Ulcers”, The Lancet, Sep. 3, 1983, pp. 532-534. |
Chinn, Steven D. et al.: “Closed Wound Suction Drainage”, The Journal of Foot Surgery, vol. 24, No. 1, 1985, pp. 76-81. |
Arnljots, Björn et al.: “Irrigation Treatment in Split-Thickness Skin Grafting of Intractable Leg Ulcers”, Scand J. Plast Reconstr. Surg., No. 19, 1985, pp. 211-213. |
Svedman, P.: “A Dressing Allowing Continuous Treatment of a Biosurface”, IRCS Medical Science: Biomedical Technology, Clinical Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, vol. 7, 1979, p. 221. |
Svedman, P. et al: “A Dressing System Providing Fluid Supply and Suction Drainage Used for Continuous of Intermittent Irrigation”, Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 17, No. 2, Aug. 1986, pp. 125-133. |
N.A. Bagautdinov, “Variant of External Vacuum Aspiration in the Treatment of Purulent Diseases of Soft Tissues,” Current Problems in Modern Clinical Surgery: Interdepartmental Collection, edited by V. Ye Volkov et al. (Chuvashia State University, Cheboksary, U.S.S.R. 1986); pp. 94-96 (and certified translation). |
K.F. Jeter, T.E. Tintle, and M. Chariker, “Managing Draining Wounds and Fistulae: New and Established Methods,” Chronic Wound Care, edited by D. Krasner (Health Management Publications, Inc., King of Prussia, PA 1990), pp. 240-246. |
G. {hacek over (Z)}ivadinovi?, V. ?uki?, {hacek over (Z)}. Maksimovi?, ?. Radak, and P. Pe{hacek over (s)}ka, “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Peripheral Blood Vessels,” Timok Medical Journal 11 (1986), pp. 161-164 (and certified translation). |
F.E. Johnson, “An Improved Technique for Skin Graft Placement Using a Suction Drain,” Surgery, Gynecology, and obstetrics 159 (1984), pp. 584-585. |
A.A. Safronov, Dissertation Abstract, Vacuum Therapy of Trophic Ulcers of the Lower Leg with Simultaneous Autoplasty of the Skin (Central Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Moscow, U.S.S.R. 1967) (and certified translation). |
M. Schein, R. Saadia, J.R. Jamieson, and G.A.G. Decker, “The ‘Sandwich Technique’ in the Management of the Open Abdomen,” British Journal of Surgery 73 (1986), pp. 369-370. |
D.E. Tribble, An Improved Sump Drain-Irrigation Device of Simple Construction, Archives of Surgery 105 (1972) pp. 511-513. |
M.J. Morykwas, L.C. Argenta, E.I. Shelton-Brown, and W. McGuirt, “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Animal Studies and Basic Foundation,” Annals of Plastic Surgery 38 (1997), pp. 553-562 (Morykwas I). |
C.E. Tennants, “The Use of Hypermia in the Postoperative Treatment of Lesions of the Extremities and Thorax,” Journal of the American Medical Association 64 (1915), pp. 1548-1549. |
Selections from W. Meyer and V. Schmieden, Bier's Hyperemic Treatment in Surgery, Medicine, and the Specialties: A Manual of Its Practical Application, (W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA 1909), pp. 17-25, 44-64, 90-96, 167-170, and 210-211. |
V.A. Solovev et al., Guidelines, The Method of Treatment of Immature External Fistulas in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract, editor-in-chief Prov. V.I. Parahonyak (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1987) (“Solovev Guidelines”). |
V.A. Kuznetsov & N.a. Bagautdinov, “Vacuum and Vacuum-Sorption Treatment of Open Septic Wounds,” in II All-Union Conference on Wounds and Wound Infections: Presentation Abstracts, edited by B.M. Kostyuchenok et al. (Moscow, U.S.S.R. Oct. 28-29, 1986) pp. 91-92 (“Bagautdinov II”). |
V.A. Solovev, Dissertation Abstract, Treatment and Prevention of Suture Failures after Gastric Resection (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1988) (“Solovev Abstract”). |
V.A.C. ® Therapy Clinical Guidelines: A Reference Source for Clinicians; Jul. 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170326004 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62334979 | May 2016 | US | |
62334349 | May 2016 | US |