Patent Grant
11858195
This disclosure relates to product packaging formed in whole or in part by a flexible film, in which the film has a score line that defines a flap that can be lifted to create an opening through the film to gain access to the product, and wherein the flap can be reattached to the remainder of the film to close the opening.
A variety of food and non-food products are packaged using flexible packaging materials formed primarily of laminations of one or more of polymer films, metallized polymer films, paper, metal foil, and the like. In many instances, packages contain products that may be used or consumed a little at a time, and the products may be susceptible to being adversely affected (e.g., becoming soggy, drying out, etc.) by exposure to the surrounding environment. Accordingly, there is frequently a desire to be able to reclose a package after its initial opening to keep product that remains in the package fresh.
Various opening and reclose arrangements have been developed for flexible packaging, for example as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,872 (“the '872 application”), filed on Apr. 5, 2005, incorporated herein by reference. Often, reclosability is achieved by using a pressure-sensitive adhesive label that is attached to the exterior of the package adjacent the location where the package is opened. Such labels are formed separately from the packaging structure itself and are added to the packaging structure. Thus, the labels thus represent additional expense. Furthermore, it is often necessary to ship a roll of the packaging material to a converter for application of the labels, after which the roll is shipped back to the packager for manufacture of the packages. This manufacturing process is inefficient. The use of labels also entails waste in that it is typically necessary to employ a release liner with the labels, which liner is removed and discarded. The labels are usually die cut from a web of material, and the skeleton left over after the die-cutting operation is also wasted.
Because of the drawbacks of using labels as noted above, the assignee of the present application has developed a flexible packaging structure with a built-in opening and reclose feature, as described in the aforementioned '872 application. Packages made using the flexible packaging structure of the '872 application avoid the disadvantages associated with the use of labels, and have additional advantages.
Consumers feel more confident about purchasing such types of packages if the packages have a tamper-evidence capability so that the consumer can readily see whether the package has already been opened. Presently, various flexible packages have features allowing a user to determine if a package has already been opened or tampered with. Unfortunately, the tamper-evidence features of such packages may be difficult to discern upon a visual inspection of the package. Further, such temper-evidence features often require removing a portion of the packaging, and thus, creating unwanted trash and potential choking hazards. The present disclosure is directed toward providing improved tamper-evidence capabilities.
The present disclosure addresses the above needs and achieves other advantages, by providing a flexible packaging structure and method for making same, in which the structure has opening/reclose and tamper-evidence features built into the structure. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the score line or die cut through the film for creating the flap includes one or more tear portions in which the flap includes a tab with an end attached to the structure, and/or an interrupted area of the flap that is not cut. When the flap is peeled back, a portion of the tab or the film in the interrupted area is torn. The tab can include an indentation and/or a prong, while the interrupted area can be formed by a transverse cut that is U-shaped or V-shaped to ensure that the tear will connect with the die cut. The presence of a tear or slit in the tab or the interrupted area indicates that the package has already been opened or tampered with.
In some embodiments, the package itself is formed to have a built-in opening and reclose feature by forming the packaging structure as a two-part structure, having an outer structure joined in face-to-face relation with an inner structure. Each of the outer and inner structures can comprise one or more layers of flexible packaging material such as polymer film, paper, metal foil, and the like. An outer line of weakness is formed in the outer structure to define an outer opening portion that can be lifted out of the plane of the outer structure. Similarly, an inner line of weakness is formed in the inner structure to define an inner opening portion that can be lifted out of the plane of the inner structure. The outer and inner opening portions are attached to each other such that the outer and inner opening portions can be lifted out of the plane as a unit, thereby creating an opening through the packaging structure defined by the inner line of weakness. The outer line of weakness includes a tear portion whose torn or untorn condition is readily apparent from a visual inspection of the outer structure.
The outer opening portion is larger in area than the inner opening portion and has a marginal region that extends beyond the peripheral edge of the inner opening portion. When the outer and inner opening portions are lifted out of the plane to create the opening, an underlying portion of the inner structure in registration with the marginal region of the outer opening portion is exposed adjacent the opening. A pressure-sensitive adhesive is applied to either the marginal region of the outer opening portion or the underlying portion of the inner structure. Therefore, after initial lifting of the outer and inner opening portions, the opening through the structure can be reclosed by adhering the marginal region of the outer opening portion to the underlying portion of the inner structure via the pressure-sensitive adhesive.
In accordance with one embodiment, the pressure-sensitive adhesive is pattern-applied onto one surface of the outer structure, the pressure-sensitive adhesive forming a strip having an outer perimeter and an inner perimeter, and a permanent laminating adhesive is pattern-applied onto the one surface of the outer structure such that the permanent adhesive does not cover the strip of pressure-sensitive adhesive. Next, the outer structure is adhesively joined to the inner structure via the permanent adhesive so as to form a laminate. The outer structure and inner structure in preferred embodiments are coextensive with each other, and advantageously are each continuous webs drawn from respective supply rolls and laminated together to form a laminate that is a continuous web.
The laminate is then advanced to a scoring station at which an outer line of weakness (also referred to herein as a “score line”) is formed through the thickness of the outer structure, and an inner score line is formed through the thickness of the inner structure. Advantageously, each of the score lines is registered with respect to the strip of pressure-sensitive adhesive such that neither score line is located where there is permanent laminating adhesive between the outer and inner structures. The outer score line delineates the outer opening portion of the outer structure that is separable from the outer structure along the outer score line, and the inner score line delineates the inner opening portion of the inner structure that is affixed to the outer opening portion by the permanent adhesive and is separable from the inner structure along the inner score line. The outer score line includes the interrupted area.
The score lines can be formed by laser scoring or by mechanical scoring or cutting such as by die cutting or kiss cutting or the like. The adhesive(s) can be applied to the outer structure as noted, but alternatively can be applied to the inner structure. The adhesive(s) can be applied using any suitable equipment and technique, such as by a gravure roll or the like.
The pressure-sensitive adhesive can be applied such that there is a region that is free of the adhesive, such as a tab, to form a grasping portion of the opening portion that can be readily grasped and pulled back to initiate opening.
The outer line of weakness or score line preferably penetrates through the thickness of the outer structure but not through the inner structure. Similarly, the inner score line preferably penetrates through the thickness of the inner structure but not through the outer structure.
The inner structure of the laminate advantageously includes a sealant layer forming the inner surface of the laminate. The sealant layer can comprise a heat seal material such as polyethylene, polypropylene, ionomer resin such as SURLYN®, or the like, or a cold seal material. The heat seal or cold seal layer can comprise either a film or a coating. The inner structure advantageously also includes a barrier layer providing a barrier against the passage of moisture and/or oxygen. In some applications such as the packaging of moisture-sensitive products (e.g., cookies or similar products that tend to be degraded when exposed to the environment), it is important to provide a moisture barrier. The barrier layer can comprise any of various polymer-based barrier materials including barrier polymer films such as ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH), polyamide, and the like; metallized polyolefin films such as polyethylene, polypropylene, oriented polypropylene, and the like; AlOx-coated polymer films; SiOx-coated polymer films; metal foil such as aluminum foil; and others. Although the term “barrier layer” is used in connection with metallized films to refer to the entire metallized film, it will be recognized that it is the layer of metal that provides the barrier function. Likewise, it is the AlOx or SiOx coating that provides the barrier function in the ceramic-coated films, but the entire film nevertheless is referred to herein as a “barrier layer”.
The outer structure advantageously includes a layer of polyester such as polyethylene terephthalate, which has a desirable crisp feel and is readily printed. The polyester layer can be printed with inks to provide graphics and indicia. In preferred embodiments, the polyester layer is transparent and is reverse-printed on the surface that faces the inner structure.
The process in accordance with the present disclosure comprises an in-line process wherein the opening and reclose features and the tam per-evidence feature are formed in the packaging laminate during the production of the laminate. Accordingly, it is not necessary to ship the laminate to a converter for application of labels or the like. Thus, the waste and the various material and shipping expenses associated with the use of separate labels are avoided.
Having thus described the disclosure in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
The present inventions now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some but not all embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, these inventions may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
As an initial overview of preferred embodiments of the invention, a flexible packaging laminate is constructed to have a built-in opening and reclose function and a tamper-evidence feature. The laminate is constructed as a multi-layer structure by adhesively laminating a first structure to a second structure, wherein each of the first and second structures comprise one or more layers of flexible material. Pressure-sensitive adhesive is applied to one of the structures before lamination. Once the laminate is formed in this manner, scoring operations are performed on both sides of the laminate, but each scoring operation penetrates only through a part of the thickness of the laminate; in particular, a scoring operation performed on the side of the laminate adjacent the first structure results in penetration through the first structure, but without complete penetration through the second structure, and preferably without any substantial penetration, and more preferably without any penetration, into the second structure. Likewise, the scoring operation performed on the side of the laminate adjacent the second structure results in penetration through the second structure, but without complete penetration through the first structure, and preferably without any substantial penetration, and more preferably without any penetration, into the first structure. The scoring operation also forms the tamper-evidence feature, as further described below.
More particularly, with reference to
Prior to printing the first structure in the print station, the surface of the first structure that is subsequently laminated to the other structure can be treated by a corona discharge or flame treatment apparatus 16 to render the surface more receptive to the inks and/or to render the surface more readily bondable to the pressure-sensitive adhesive that is subsequently applied to the surface as described below. Alternatively, the first structure 10 can have already been so treated prior to being wound into the supply roll 12, such that the treatment apparatus 16 is unnecessary.
Following the optional corona/flame treatment and/or optional printing operation, and with reference to
The pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 can comprise various compositions. Pressure-sensitive adhesives form viscoelastic bonds that are aggressively and permanently tacky, adhere without the need of more than a finger or hand pressure, and require no activation by water, solvent or heat. Pressure-sensitive adhesives are often based on non-crosslinked rubber adhesives in a latex emulsion or solvent-borne form, or can comprise acrylic and methacrylate adhesives, styrene copolymers (SIS/SBS), and silicones. Acrylic adhesives are known for excellent environmental resistance and fast-setting time when compared with other resin systems. Acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives often use an acrylate system. Natural rubber, synthetic rubber or elastomer sealants and adhesives can be based on a variety of systems such as silicone, polyurethane, chloroprene, butyl, polybutadiene, isoprene, or neoprene. When the packaging laminate of the invention is to be used for food packaging, the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 generally must be a food-grade composition. Various pressure-sensitive adhesives are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in direct food contact, as regulated by 21 CFR Part 175.300. A preferred food-grade pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 for use in the present invention is Jonbond 743 available from Bostik Findley. Additives (e.g., particulates or the like) can be added to the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 to reduce the tenacity of the bond to the underlying second structure 42, if necessary, so that the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 readily detaches from the second structure on opening (particularly on the very first opening).
When applied in a pattern as opposed to being flood-coated or applied everywhere on the first structure 10, the pattern 22 of pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 is applied to the first structure 10 at regular intervals along the first structure 10. The spacing or index distance d between the patterns 22 can correspond to a dimension, such as a length, of packages to be produced from the packaging laminate.
The adhesive application station 18 can comprise any suitable device capable of accurately applying the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 to the first structure 10 in the desired pattern 22, at regular intervals along the structure. For example, as shown, the adhesive application station can comprise a gravure roll 24 that picks up the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 from a reservoir 26 on the outer surface of the roll such that the adhesive fills one or more recessed areas in the surface. A doctor blade 28 scrapes off excess adhesive so that it remains essentially only in the recessed area(s). The first structure 10 is contacted by the gravure roll 24; a backing roll 30 provides support on the opposite side of the first structure 10.
After application of the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20, the first structure 10 is advanced to a dryer 31 such as an oven or the like, to dry the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20. In the case of the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 being pattern-applied, the first structure 10 is then advanced to a second adhesive application station 32 at which a permanent laminating adhesive 34 (
The first structure 10 is then advanced to a laminating station 40, comprising a pair of rolls forming a nip therebetween. The first structure 10 is passed through the nip along with a second structure 42 that is advanced from its own supply roll 44, and the first and second structures 10/42 are laminated to each other. The second structure 42 comprises one or more layers of flexible material, and is coextensive with the first structure 10—i.e., the width of the second structure 42 is substantially equal to the width of the first structure 10 and the longitudinal edges of the second structure 42 substantially coincide with the longitudinal edges of the first structure 10. The resulting laminate 46 is then advanced to a reel-up (not shown) where it is wound into a roll for subsequent processing in the second phase of the manufacturing process as described below. Alternatively, it is possible for the reel-up operation to be omitted, such that the laminate is directly advanced to the second phase.
With reference to
The first scoring station 50 can comprise a laser 54 as depicted in
As noted, the first score line 52 must be in registration with the outer perimeter 22a of the pressure-sensitive adhesive strip 20 (and the outer perimeter of the thumb tab 23, if present). To accomplish this registration, the operation of the laser 54 is controlled to be synchronized with the advancement of the laminate 46. A sensor 56 disposed adjacent the laminate 46 can be used for detecting a feature on the laminate whose location in relation to the strip of pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 is known, and the sensor's output signal can be used by a suitable controller (not shown) for controlling the laser 54.
The first score line 52 may also include one or more tear portions 65 as a tamper-evidence feature. A tear portion 65 may comprise one or more interrupted areas 57 in which the first structure 10 is not cut or scored, and whose uncut condition is readily apparent from a visual inspection of the first structure 10. The interrupted areas 57 are located such that when the flap or outer opening portion 86 bounded by the first score line 52 is peeled back to create an opening through the laminate, the first structure 10 tears through the interrupted areas 57 to connect the two portions of the first score line 52 on opposite sides of each interrupted area 57. To help ensure that the two portions of the score line will be connected even if the tear line tends to wander in direction, the score line 52 at the “downstream” side of each interrupted area 57 can terminate in a U- or V-shaped portion 58 that extends generally transverse to the direction along which the score line 52 extends. The “downstream” side refers to the side of the interrupted area 57 that is located farthest along the downstream direction (generally left-to-right in
Next, the laminate is advanced to a second scoring station 60 at which a second, or inner, score line 62 is formed through the thickness of the second structure 42. When the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 has been pattern-applied, the second score line 62 is in registration with (i.e., coincides with) the inner perimeter 22b (
As shown in
The second scoring station 60 can comprise a laser 64. The operation of the laser 64 is synchronized with the advancement of the laminate in a manner as described above. A sensor 66 can detect a feature, such as an eye mark, on the laminate whose location in relation to the pressure-sensitive adhesive strip 20 is known, and the sensor 66 output can be used for regulating the laser operation so that the second score line 62 is in registration with the inner perimeter of the pressure-sensitive adhesive strip 20.
As an alternative to the use of lasers for scoring the laminate, the score lines 52, 62 can be formed in the laminate by mechanical scoring or cutting. For instance, as depicted in
Additionally, it is within the scope of the invention to laser-score one side of the laminate and to kiss cut or otherwise mechanically score the other side. This can be advantageous, for example, when one of the structures making up the laminate is readily scored by a laser but the other structure is not. For instance, when the first structure 10 is a polyester such as PET, it can readily be scored with a laser, but if a polyethylene heat seal layer is employed on the opposite side, laser scoring may not be the best choice because polyethylene does not score well with a laser. In this case, kiss cutting or other mechanical scoring can be used to score the inner structure 42.
After the scoring operations, the laminate 46 can be sent to a reel-up (not shown) and wound into a roll for subsequent processing. The laminate can also be slit into a plurality of partial widths and wound into multiple rolls. In this latter instance, each partial width would have the recurring patterns of pressure-sensitive and permanent adhesives applied with suitably configured adhesive applicators to the full-width material, and would have the recurring score lines formed by suitably configured scoring devices acting on either the full-width laminate prior to slitting or acting on each partial-width portion after slitting.
An advantage of the invention, versus the formation of a web having discrete labels applied to a partial portion of the web surface as in the prior art, is that the laminate has a uniform thickness throughout (because the first and second structures are coextensive) and therefore winds well into good-quality rolls. In contrast, a web with labels centrally located in the width of the web tends to produce wound rolls that are soft in the radial direction at the two ends of the roll where the labels are not present. Additionally, the web with labels is much thicker than laminates made in accordance with the invention, and hence the laminates of the invention can achieve a greater square footage per roll of a given diameter. As already noted, a further drawback to the use of labels is the necessity of applying the labels to the web in an “off-line” process, which often entails shipping a roll of the web to a converter that applies the labels and then ships the roll back to the package manufacturer. In the process of the invention, the manufacture of the laminate and the incorporation of the opening/reclose and tamper-evidence features in the laminate are conducted in an in-line fashion as part of the same overall process. The process of the invention thus is much more efficient and less costly.
Additionally, the invention avoids other drawbacks associated with the use of labels. More specifically, pressure-sensitive adhesive labels typically require a release liner that is peeled off and thrown away, which represents waste, and create a potential choke hazard. Furthermore, there is the additional waste of the skeleton material left over after die-cutting the labels from the label web material. The present invention eliminates such waste and attendant costs.
Some possible applications for the resulting laminate are now explained with reference to
In the illustrated package, the portion of the outer wrapper 74 having the score lines 52, 62 is provided to be on the top surface of the package. The area of the wrapper 74 bounded by the score lines can constitute any fraction of the total top surface of the package, but advantageously the area is a majority of the total surface area of the top surface.
Based on the previous description of the laminate 46 and its formation process, it will be appreciated that the presence of the score lines 52, 62 has little or no impact on the barrier function of the outer wrapper 74 because each score line extends only partially through the total thickness of the wrapper 74 and the score lines are not aligned with each other. Additionally, the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 fills the space between the score lines so that even if the score lines overlap somewhat in the thickness direction, there is still no open route between them. Furthermore, the score lines typically have a small width, on the order of a few thousandths of an inch.
Various materials can be used for the construction of the outer wrapper 74. With reference to
The barrier layer 82 can comprise any of various barrier materials including barrier polymer films such as: ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH), polyamide, and the like; metallized polyolefin films such as polyethylene, polypropylene, oriented polypropylene, and the like; AlOx-coated polymer films; SiOx-coated polymer films; metal foil; and others.
The barrier layer 82 and sealant layer 84 can be joined in various ways, including adhesive lamination, extrusion lamination, or coextrusion.
Advantageously, the laminate includes a metallization layer or a metal foil layer between the first structure 10 and the second structure 42, for example by providing a metallization layer 85 on the surface of the layer 82 that faces the first structure 10. This is beneficial in enhancing the barrier performance of the laminate as already noted. Additionally, however, the metallization layer or 85 metal foil layer can also be helpful when a laser is used for scoring the second structure 42. In particular, when the sealant layer 84 comprises polyethylene, which is not as readily scored by laser as some other materials such as polyester, it can be difficult to employ a sufficiently high laser energy to score through the polyethylene sealant layer without scoring through the laminate more deeply than desired. In some cases, the entire thickness of the laminate may be scored through, which is undesirable. The metallization layer or metal foil layer can be helpful in “tuning” the laser to penetrate only up to the metallization layer 85 or foil layer.
The function of the opening/reclose and tamper-evidence features provided by the pattern-applied adhesives and the score lines will now be described. With reference to
The first score line 52 includes the interrupted areas 57 and transverse score lines 58 as previously described. Prior to initial opening of the package, the uncut condition of the interrupted areas 57 is readily apparent, such that the consumer can see that the package has not yet been opened.
When the outer opening portion 86 is detached from the outer wrapper along the first score line 52 and is peeled back as in
The package is reclosable by re-attaching the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 to the surface 92 of the inner structure 42 to restore the package to a closed condition as shown in
The outer structure 10 preferably has a greater affinity for bonding with the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 than does the surface 92 of the inner structure 42, and hence the pressure-sensitive adhesive 20 is detached from the surface 92 and remains attached to the marginal region 90 of the outer opening portion 86 as shown in
Although it is preferred to have the pressure-sensitive adhesive be applied to the outer structure and to remain on the outer structure upon opening, it is also within the scope of the invention to apply the pressure-sensitive adhesive to the inner structure and to remain on the inner structure upon opening. This is less preferred, however, because of the greater tendency for crumbs or the like from the contained products to become adhered to the pressure-sensitive adhesive and thereby reduce its adhesiveness with repeated openings and reclosings. It is believed that this tendency is reduced when the pressure-sensitive adhesive remains with the outer structure, since it is out of the way of the package opening when products are being removed.
It will be appreciated from the above description that laminates made in accordance with the invention provide a tamper-evidence function for a package because after opening it is impossible to replace the opening portions 86, 88 in such a way as to completely restore the package to its original unopened condition, as previously noted. When printing is included on the laminate, it is even more noticeable when the package has been opened because it is difficult to achieve perfect registration of the printed matter across the score line when reclosing the package.
The printing on the laminate can include text adjacent to the interrupted areas 57 of the first score line 52, calling the consumer's attention to the presence of the interrupted areas and indicating that if they are torn through at a tear portion 65, the consumer should not purchase the package.
The laminates made in accordance with the invention can be used for forming other types of packages or tamper-evidence features. For instance,
The packages illustrated in
The stand-up pouch 100 of
The embodiment in
It should be noted that the terms “line of weakness” and “score line” as used herein refer either to a complete cutting through the thickness of one or more layers of the laminate or to a partial cutting through of the thickness of such layer(s) allowing the layer(s) to be severed along the score line.
The packages described above are formed by completely enveloping the contents in the flexible laminate. Alternatively, however, it is within the scope of the invention to employ the flexible laminate as a lidding stock for forming flexible lids that can be secured (e.g., by heat-sealing or the like) to a flange of a tray or other container that contains the contents. In this manner, the lid includes a built-in opening and reclose feature as previously described. For instance,
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these inventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/985,574, filed Aug. 5, 2020, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/974,055 filed May 8, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/668,947, filed Nov. 5, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/043,442, filed Mar. 6, 2008, each of which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3069066 | Peckham | Dec 1962 | A |
| 3124246 | De Remer et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
| 3185578 | Scharre | May 1965 | A |
| 3193978 | Bader | Jul 1965 | A |
| 3212381 | Heyer | Oct 1965 | A |
| 3234705 | Schwartz | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3874143 | Braber | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3905646 | Brackmann et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3909582 | Bowen | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3982685 | Shimada | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4185754 | Julius | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4260061 | Jacobs | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4411365 | Horikawa et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4420080 | Nakamura | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4468811 | Shaw et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4549063 | Ang et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4552269 | Chang | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4572377 | Beckett | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4577761 | Nadaskay | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4586312 | Limousin | May 1986 | A |
| 4610357 | Nakamura | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4653250 | Nakamura | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4673601 | Lamping et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4679693 | Forman | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4681781 | Murray et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4693365 | Corella | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4723301 | Chang | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4739879 | Nakamura | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4784885 | Carespodi | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4790436 | Nakamura | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4795271 | Lane et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4840270 | Caputo et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4868027 | Hunkeler et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4874096 | Tessera-Chiesa | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4923309 | VanErden | May 1990 | A |
| 5060848 | Ewan | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5065868 | Cornelissen et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5116140 | Hirashima | May 1992 | A |
| 5124388 | Purett et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5158499 | Guckenberger | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5167455 | Forman | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5333735 | Focke et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5464285 | Anderson | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5531325 | Deflander et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5535885 | Daniel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5613779 | Niwa | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5630308 | Guckenberger | May 1997 | A |
| 5683029 | Lyons | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5836697 | Chiesa | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5855435 | Chiesa | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5862101 | Haas et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5908246 | Arimura et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5938013 | Palumbo | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6056141 | Navarini et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6113271 | Scott et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120860 | Bowen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6126137 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6126317 | Anderson | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6296884 | Okerlund | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6309105 | Palumbo | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6383592 | Lowry et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6428867 | Scott et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6450685 | Scott | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6457585 | Huffer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6517243 | Huffer et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6554134 | Guibert | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6589622 | Scott | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6918532 | Sierra-Gomez et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 7007423 | Andersson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7717620 | Hebert et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 8262830 | Hebert et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8262832 | Hebert et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8408792 | Cole et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8545099 | Davis et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 9850056 | Shaw et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 20020114541 | Huffer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030179955 | Rehwinkel | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231811 | Hodson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040150221 | Brown | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040206637 | Sierra-Gomez et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050095809 | Nakayama et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050247764 | Sierra-Gomez et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050247765 | DeBusk | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050276525 | Hebert | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060018569 | Bonenfant | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060171611 | Rapparini | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070095709 | Saito et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070095809 | Lee | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209959 | Burgess | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080037911 | Cole et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20090226117 | Davis et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100018974 | Lyzenga et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20120267386 | Hebert et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20170036836 | Hebert et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20180071974 | Huffer | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0298054 | Jan 1989 | EP |
| 0408831 | Jan 1991 | EP |
| 0661154 | Jul 1995 | EP |
| 0796208 | Sep 1997 | EP |
| 0905048 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 0957045 | Nov 1999 | EP |
| 1449789 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 2243716 | Oct 2010 | EP |
| 2574570 | Apr 2013 | EP |
| H05-49622 | Jun 1993 | JP |
| H05-51794 | Jul 1993 | JP |
| H10500378 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 2000-095282 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2008-502555 | Jan 2008 | JP |
| 2011 513153 | Apr 2011 | JP |
| 10-2004-0025490 | Mar 2004 | KR |
| WO 9530599 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO 0104020 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 02066341 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 03059776 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO 2005123535 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2010046623 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2013114091 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2005/018614 dated Sep. 16, 2005. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2005/018614 dated Oct. 6, 2006. |
| European Search Report for European Application No. 10007352.7 dated Sep. 23, 2010. |
| European Search Report for European Application No. 12199183.0 dated Mar. 5, 2013. |
| Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2013-173126 dated Sep. 29, 2015. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2018/046620 dated Nov. 13, 2018. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230041551 A1 | Feb 2023 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15974055 | May 2018 | US |
| Child | 16985574 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16985574 | Aug 2020 | US |
| Child | 17970691 | US | |
| Parent | 13668947 | Nov 2012 | US |
| Child | 15974055 | US | |
| Parent | 12043442 | Mar 2008 | US |
| Child | 13668947 | US |
