Flexible support structure for a geared architecture gas turbine engine

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10301968
  • Patent Number
    10,301,968
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 21, 2015
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 28, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A gas turbine engine according to an example of the present disclosure includes, among other things, a fan shaft configured to drive a fan, a support configured to support at least a portion of the fan shaft, the support defining a support transverse stiffness and a support lateral stiffness, a gear system coupled to the fan shaft, and a flexible support configured to at least partially support the gear system. The flexible support defines a flexible support transverse stiffness with respect to the support transverse stiffness and a flexible support lateral stiffness with respect to the support lateral stiffness. The input defines an input transverse stiffness with respect to the support transverse stiffness and an input lateral stiffness with respect to the support lateral stiffness.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates to a gas turbine engine, and more particularly to a flexible support structure for a geared architecture therefor.


Epicyclic gearboxes with planetary or star gear trains may be used in gas turbine engines for their compact designs and efficient high gear reduction capabilities. Planetary and star gear trains generally include three gear train elements: a central sun gear, an outer ring gear with internal gear teeth, and a plurality of planet gears supported by a planet carrier between and in meshed engagement with both the sun gear and the ring gear. The gear train elements share a common longitudinal central axis, about which at least two rotate. An advantage of epicyclic gear trains is that a rotary input can be connected to any one of the three elements. One of the other two elements is then held stationary with respect to the other two to permit the third to serve as an output.


In gas turbine engine applications, where a speed reduction transmission is required, the central sun gear generally receives rotary input from the powerplant, the outer ring gear is generally held stationary and the planet gear carrier rotates in the same direction as the sun gear to provide torque output at a reduced rotational speed. In star gear trains, the planet carrier is held stationary and the output shaft is driven by the ring gear in a direction opposite that of the sun gear.


During flight, light weight structural cases deflect with aero and maneuver loads causing significant amounts of transverse deflection commonly known as backbone bending of the engine. This deflection may cause the individual sun or planet gear's axis of rotation to lose parallelism with the central axis. This deflection may result in some misalignment at gear train journal bearings and at the gear teeth mesh, which may lead to efficiency losses from the misalignment and potential reduced life from increases in the concentrated stresses.


SUMMARY

A gas turbine engine according to an example of the present disclosure includes a fan shaft configured to drive a fan, a support configured to support at least a portion of the fan shaft, the support defining a support transverse stiffness and a support lateral stiffness, a gear system coupled to the fan shaft, and a flexible support configured to at least partially support the gear system. The flexible support defines a flexible support transverse stiffness with respect to the support transverse stiffness and a flexible support lateral stiffness with respect to the support lateral stiffness. The input defines an input transverse stiffness with respect to the support transverse stiffness and an input lateral stiffness with respect to the support lateral stiffness.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the support and the flexible support are mounted to a static structure.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the static structure is a front center body of the gas turbine engine.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the flexible support is mounted to a planet carrier of the gear system, and the input is mounted to a sun gear of the gear system.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the fan shaft is mounted to a ring gear of the gear system.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the gear system is a star system.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the flexible support is mounted to a ring gear of the gear system, and the input is mounted to a sun gear of the gear system.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the fan shaft is mounted to a planet carrier of the gear system.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the flexible support transverse stiffness and the input transverse stiffness are both less than the support transverse stiffness.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the flexible support transverse stiffness and the input transverse stiffness are each less than about 20% of the support transverse stiffness.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the flexible support transverse stiffness and the input transverse stiffness are each less than about 11% of the support transverse stiffness.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the input to the gear system is coupled to a turbine section, and the gear system is configured to drive a compressor rotor at a common speed with the fan shaft.


A gas turbine engine according to an example of the present disclosure includes a fan shaft configured to drive a fan, a support configured to support at least a portion of the fan shaft, and a gear system configured to drive the fan shaft. The gear system includes a gear mesh that defines a gear mesh transverse stiffness and a gear mesh lateral stiffness. A flexible support is configured to at least partially support the gear system. The flexible support defines a flexible support transverse stiffness with respect to the gear mesh transverse stiffness and a flexible support lateral stiffness with respect to the gear mesh lateral stiffness. The input defines an input transverse stiffness with respect to the gear mesh transverse stiffness and an input lateral stiffness with respect to the gear mesh lateral stiffness.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, both the flexible support transverse stiffness and the input transverse stiffness are less than the gear mesh transverse stiffness.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the flexible support transverse stiffness is less than about 8% of the gear mesh transverse stiffness, the input transverse stiffness is less than about 5% of the gear mesh transverse stiffness, and a transverse stiffness of a ring gear of the gear system is less than about 20% of the gear mesh transverse stiffness.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, a transverse stiffness of a planet journal bearing which supports a planet gear of the gear system is less than or equal to the gear mesh transverse stiffness.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the support and the flexible support are mounted to a front center body of the gas turbine engine.


A method of designing a gas turbine engine according to an example of the present disclosure includes providing a fan shaft, and providing a support configured to support at least a portion of the fan shaft, the support defining at least one of a support transverse stiffness and a support lateral stiffness, and providing a gear system coupled to the fan shaft. The gear system includes a gear mesh that defines a gear mesh lateral stiffness and a gear mesh transverse stiffness. The method includes providing a flexible support configured to at least partially support the gear system, and providing an input to the gear system. The flexible support defines a flexible support transverse stiffness with respect to the gear mesh transverse stiffness and a flexible support lateral stiffness with respect to the gear mesh lateral stiffness. The input defines an input transverse stiffness with respect to the gear mesh transverse stiffness and an input lateral stiffness with respect to the gear mesh lateral stiffness.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, the flexible support lateral stiffness is less than the gear mesh lateral stiffness, and the flexible support transverse stiffness is less than the gear mesh transverse stiffness.


In a further embodiment of any of the forgoing embodiments, both the flexible support transverse stiffness and the input transverse stiffness are less than the gear mesh transverse stiffness.


The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of an embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various features will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the disclosed non-limiting embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:



FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-section of a gas turbine engine;



FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-section of a section of the gas turbine engine which illustrates a fan drive gear system (FDGS);



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a flex mount arrangement for one non-limiting embodiment of the FDGS;



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a flex mount arrangement for another non-limiting embodiment of the FDGS;



FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a flex mount arrangement for another non-limiting embodiment of a star system FDGS;



FIG. 6 is a schematic view of a flex mount arrangement for another non-limiting embodiment of a planetary system FDGS.



FIG. 7 is a schematic view of a flex mount arrangement for another non-limiting embodiment of a star system FDGS;



FIG. 8 is a schematic view of a flex mount arrangement for another non-limiting embodiment of a planetary system FDGS;



FIG. 9 shows another embodiment; and



FIG. 10 shows yet another embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a gas turbine engine 20. The gas turbine engine 20 is disclosed herein as a two-spool turbofan that generally incorporates a fan section 22, a compressor section 24, a combustor section 26 and a turbine section 28. Alternative engines might include an augmentor section (not shown) among other systems or features. The fan section 22 drives air along a bypass flow path B in a bypass duct defined within a nacelle 15, while the compressor section 24 drives air along a core flow path C for compression and communication into the combustor section 26 then expansion through the turbine section 28. Although depicted as a two-spool turbofan gas turbine engine in the disclosed non-limiting embodiment, it should be understood that the concepts described herein are not limited to use with two-spool turbofans as the teachings may be applied to other types of turbine engines including three-spool architectures.


The exemplary engine 20 generally includes a low speed spool 30 and a high speed spool 32 mounted for rotation about an engine central longitudinal axis A relative to an engine static structure 36 via several bearing systems 38. It should be understood that various bearing systems 38 at various locations may alternatively or additionally be provided, and the location of bearing systems 38 may be varied as appropriate to the application.


The low speed spool 30 generally includes an inner shaft 40 that interconnects a fan 42, a first (or low) pressure compressor 44 and a first (or low) pressure turbine 46. The inner shaft 40 is connected to the fan 42 through a speed change mechanism, which in exemplary gas turbine engine 20 is illustrated as a geared architecture 48 to drive the fan 42 at a lower speed than the low speed spool 30. The high speed spool 32 includes an outer shaft 50 that interconnects a second (or high) pressure compressor 52 and a second (or high) pressure turbine 54. A combustor 56 is arranged in exemplary gas turbine 20 between the high pressure compressor 52 and the high pressure turbine 54. A mid-turbine frame 57 of the engine static structure 36 is arranged generally between the high pressure turbine 54 and the low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 57 further supports bearing systems 38 in the turbine section 28. The inner shaft 40 and the outer shaft 50 are concentric and rotate via bearing systems 38 about the engine central longitudinal axis A which is collinear with their longitudinal axes.


The core airflow is compressed by the low pressure compressor 44 then the high pressure compressor 52, mixed and burned with fuel in the combustor 56, then expanded over the high pressure turbine 54 and low pressure turbine 46. The mid-turbine frame 57 includes airfoils 59 which are in the core airflow path C. The turbines 46, 54 rotationally drive the respective low speed spool 30 and high speed spool 32 in response to the expansion. It will be appreciated that each of the positions of the fan section 22, compressor section 24, combustor section 26, turbine section 28, and fan drive gear system 48 may be varied. For example, gear system 48 may be located aft of combustor section 26 or even aft of turbine section 28, and fan section 22 may be positioned forward or aft of the location of gear system 48.


The engine 20 in one example is a high-bypass geared aircraft engine. In a further example, the engine 20 bypass ratio is greater than about six (6), with an example embodiment being greater than about ten (10), the geared architecture 48 is an epicyclic gear train, such as a planetary gear system or other gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3 and the low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about five. In one disclosed embodiment, the engine 20 bypass ratio is greater than about ten (10:1), the fan diameter is significantly larger than that of the low pressure compressor 44, and the low pressure turbine 46 has a pressure ratio that is greater than about five 5:1. Low pressure turbine 46 pressure ratio is pressure measured prior to inlet of low pressure turbine 46 as related to the pressure at the outlet of the low pressure turbine 46 prior to an exhaust nozzle. The geared architecture 48 may be an epicycle gear train, such as a planetary gear system or other gear system, with a gear reduction ratio of greater than about 2.3:1. It should be understood, however, that the above parameters are only exemplary of one embodiment of a geared architecture engine and that the present invention is applicable to other gas turbine engines including direct drive turbofans.


A significant amount of thrust is provided by the bypass flow B due to the high bypass ratio. The fan section 22 of the engine 20 is designed for a particular flight condition—typically cruise at about 0.8 Mach and about 35,000 feet. The flight condition of 0.8 Mach and 35,000 ft, with the engine at its best fuel consumption—also known as “bucket cruise Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (‘TSFC’)”—is the industry standard parameter of lbm of fuel being burned divided by lbf of thrust the engine produces at that minimum point. “Low fan pressure ratio” is the pressure ratio across the fan blade alone, without a Fan Exit Guide Vane (“FEGV”) system. The low fan pressure ratio as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1.45. “Low corrected fan tip speed” is the actual fan tip speed in ft/sec divided by an industry standard temperature correction of [(Tram °R)/(518.7°R)]0.5. The “Low corrected fan tip speed” as disclosed herein according to one non-limiting embodiment is less than about 1150 ft/second.


With reference to FIG. 2, the geared architecture 48 generally includes a fan drive gear system (FDGS) 60 driven by the low speed spool 30 (illustrated schematically) through an input 62. The input 62, which may be in the form of a coupling, both transfers torque from the low speed spool 30 to the geared architecture 48 and facilitates the segregation of vibrations and other transients therebetween. In the disclosed non-limiting embodiment, the FDGS 60 may include an epicyclic gear system which may be, for example, a star system or a planet system.


The input coupling 62 may include an interface spline 64 joined, by a gear spline 66, to a sun gear 68 of the FDGS 60. The sun gear 68 is in meshed engagement with multiple planet gears 70, of which the illustrated planet gear 70 is representative. Each planet gear 70 is rotatably mounted in a planet carrier 72 by a respective planet journal bearing 75. Rotary motion of the sun gear 68 urges each planet gear 70 to rotate about a respective longitudinal axis P.


Each planet gear 70 is also in meshed engagement with rotating ring gear 74 that is mechanically connected to a fan shaft 76. Since the planet gears 70 mesh with both the rotating ring gear 74 as well as the rotating sun gear 68, the planet gears 70 rotate about their own axes to drive the ring gear 74 to rotate about engine axis A. The rotation of the ring gear 74 is conveyed to the fan 42 (FIG. 1) through the fan shaft 76 to thereby drive the fan 42 at a lower speed than the low speed spool 30. It should be understood that the described geared architecture 48 is but a single non-limiting embodiment and that various other geared architectures will alternatively benefit herefrom.


With reference to FIG. 3, a flexible support 78 supports the planet carrier 72 to at least partially support the FDGS 60A with respect to the static structure 36 such as a front center body which facilitates the segregation of vibrations and other transients therebetween. It should be understood that various gas turbine engine case structures may alternatively or additionally provide the static structure and flexible support 78. It should be understood that lateral as defined herein is generally transverse to the axis of rotation A and the term “transverse” refers to a pivotal bending movement with respect to the axis of rotation A which typically absorbs deflection applied to the FDGS 60. The static structure 36 may further include a number 1 and 1.5 bearing support static structure 82 which is commonly referred to as a “K-frame” which supports the number 1 and number 1.5 bearing systems 38A, 38B. Notably, the K-frame bearing support defines a lateral stiffness (represented as Kframe in FIG. 3) and a transverse stiffness (represented as KframeBEND in FIG. 3) as the referenced factors in this non-limiting embodiment.


In this disclosed non-limiting embodiment, the lateral stiffness (KFS; KIC) of both the flexible support 78 and the input coupling 62 are each less than about 11% of the lateral stiffness (Kframe). That is, the lateral stiffness of the entire FDGS 60 is controlled by this lateral stiffness relationship. Alternatively, or in addition to this relationship, the transverse stiffness of both the flexible support 78 and the input coupling 62 are each less than about 11% of the transverse stiffness (KframeBEND). That is, the transverse stiffness of the entire FDGS 60 is controlled by this transverse stiffness relationship.


With reference to FIG. 4, another non-limiting embodiment of a FDGS 60B includes a flexible support 78′ that supports a rotationally fixed ring gear 74′. The fan shaft 76′ is driven by the planet carrier 72′ in the schematically illustrated planet system which otherwise generally follows the star system architecture of FIG. 3.


With reference to FIG. 5, the lateral stiffness relationship within a FDGS 60C itself (for a star system architecture) is schematically represented. The lateral stiffness (KIC) of an input coupling 62, a lateral stiffness (KFS) of a flexible support 78, a lateral stiffness (KRG) of a ring gear 74 and a lateral stiffness (KJB) of a planet journal bearing 75 are controlled with respect to a lateral stiffness (KGM) of a gear mesh within the FDGS 60.


In the disclosed non-limiting embodiment, the stiffness (KGM) may be defined by the gear mesh between the sun gear 68 and the multiple planet gears 70. The lateral stiffness (KGM) within the FDGS 60 is the referenced factor and the static structure 82′ rigidly supports the fan shaft 76. That is, the fan shaft 76 is supported upon bearing systems 38A, 38B which are essentially rigidly supported by the static structure 82′. The lateral stiffness (KJB) may be mechanically defined by, for example, the stiffness within the planet journal bearing 75 and the lateral stiffness (KRG) of the ring gear 74 may be mechanically defined by, for example, the geometry of the ring gear wings 74L, 74R (FIG. 2).


In the disclosed non-limiting embodiment, the lateral stiffness (KRG) of the ring gear 74 is less than about 12% of the lateral stiffness (KGM) of the gear mesh; the lateral stiffness (KFS) of the flexible support 78 is less than about 8% of the lateral stiffness (KGM) of the gear mesh; the lateral stiffness (KJB) of the planet journal bearing 75 is less than or equal to the lateral stiffness (KGM) of the gear mesh; and the lateral stiffness (KIC) of an input coupling 62 is less than about 5% of the lateral stiffness (KGM) of the gear mesh.


With reference to FIG. 6, another non-limiting embodiment of a lateral stiffness relationship within a FDGS 60D itself are schematically illustrated for a planetary gear system architecture, which otherwise generally follows the star system architecture of FIG. 5.


It should be understood that combinations of the above lateral stiffness relationships may be utilized as well. The lateral stiffness of each of structural components may be readily measured as compared to film stiffness and spline stiffness which may be relatively difficult to determine.


By flex mounting to accommodate misalignment of the shafts under design loads, the FDGS design loads have been reduced by more than 17% which reduces overall engine weight. The flex mount facilitates alignment to increase system life and reliability. The lateral flexibility in the flexible support and input coupling allows the FDGS to essentially ‘float’ with the fan shaft during maneuvers. This allows: (a) the torque transmissions in the fan shaft, the input coupling and the flexible support to remain constant during maneuvers; (b) maneuver induced lateral loads in the fan shaft (which may otherwise potentially misalign gears and damage teeth) to be mainly reacted to through the number 1 and 1.5 bearing support K-frame; and (c) both the flexible support and the input coupling to transmit small amounts of lateral loads into the FDGS. The splines, gear tooth stiffness, journal bearings, and ring gear ligaments are specifically designed to minimize gear tooth stress variations during maneuvers. The other connections to the FDGS are flexible mounts (turbine coupling, case flex mount). These mount spring rates have been determined from analysis and proven in rig and flight testing to isolate the gears from engine maneuver loads. In addition, the planet journal bearing spring rate may also be controlled to support system flexibility.



FIG. 7 is similar to FIG. 5 but shows the transverse stiffness relationships within the FDGS 60C (for a star system architecture). The transverse stiffness (KICBEND) of the input coupling 62, a transverse stiffness (KFSBEND) of the flexible support 78, a transverse stiffness (KRGBEND) of the ring gear 74 and a transverse stiffness (KJBBEND) of the planet journal bearing 75 are controlled with respect to a transverse stiffness (KGMBEND) of the gear mesh within the FDGS 60.


In the disclosed non-limiting embodiment, the stiffness (KGMBEND) may be defined by the gear mesh between the sun gear 68 and the multiple planet gears 70. The transverse stiffness (KGMBEND) within the FDGS 60 is the referenced factor and the static structure 82′ rigidly supports the fan shaft 76. That is, the fan shaft 76 is supported upon bearing systems 38A, 38B which are essentially rigidly supported by the static structure 82′. The transverse stiffness (KJBBEND) may be mechanically defined by, for example, the stiffness within the planet journal bearing 75 and the transverse stiffness (KRGBEND) of the ring gear 74 may be mechanically defined by, for example, the geometry of the ring gear wings 74L, 74R (FIG. 2).


In the disclosed non-limiting embodiment, the transverse stiffness (KRGBEND) of the ring gear 74 is less than about 12% of the transverse stiffness (KGMBEND) of the gear mesh; the transverse stiffness (KFSBEND) of the flexible support 78 is less than about 8% of the transverse stiffness (KGMBEND) of the gear mesh; the transverse stiffness (KJBBEND) of the planet journal bearing 75 is less than or equal to the transverse stiffness (KGMBEND) of the gear mesh; and the transverse stiffness (KICBEND) of an input coupling 62 is less than about 5% of the transverse stiffness (KGMBEND) of the gear mesh.



FIG. 8 is similar to FIG. 6 but shows the transverse stiffness relationship within the FDGS 60D for the planetary gear system architecture.



FIG. 9 shows an embodiment 200, wherein there is a fan drive turbine 208 driving a shaft 206 to in turn drive a fan rotor 202. A gear reduction 204 may be positioned between the fan drive turbine 208 and the fan rotor 202. This gear reduction 204 may be structured, mounted and operate like the gear reduction disclosed above. A compressor rotor 210 is driven by an intermediate pressure turbine 212, and a second stage compressor rotor 214 is driven by a turbine rotor 216. A combustion section 218 is positioned intermediate the compressor rotor 214 and the turbine section 216.



FIG. 10 shows yet another embodiment 300 wherein a fan rotor 302 and a first stage compressor 304 rotate at a common speed. The gear reduction 306 (which may be structured, mounted and operate as disclosed above) is intermediate the compressor rotor 304 and a shaft 308, which is driven by a low pressure turbine section.


It should be understood that relative positional terms such as “forward,” “aft,” “upper,” “lower,” “above,” “below,” and the like are with reference to the normal operational attitude of the vehicle and should not be considered otherwise limiting.


It should be understood that like reference numerals identify corresponding or similar elements throughout the several drawings. It should also be understood that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom.


Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present disclosure.


The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Various non-limiting embodiments are disclosed herein, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that various modifications and variations in light of the above teachings will fall within the scope of the appended claims. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the disclosure may be practiced other than as specifically described. For that reason the appended claims should be studied to determine true scope and content.

Claims
  • 1. A gas turbine engine comprising: a fan shaft driving a fan having fan blades;a frame which supports said fan shaft having a frame lateral stiffness and a frame transverse stiffness;a plurality of gears in driving engagement with said fan shaft; and a flexible support which supports said plurality of gears, said flexible support having at least one of a flexible support lateral stiffness and a flexible support transverse stiffness that is less than 11% of a respective one of said frame lateral stiffness and said frame transverse stiffness.
  • 2. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 1, wherein said plurality of gears includes a gear mesh, said gear mesh having a gear mesh lateral stiffness and a gear mesh transverse stiffness, and at least one of said flexible support lateral stiffness and said flexible support transverse stiffness is less than 8% of a respective one of said gear mesh lateral stiffness and said gear mesh transverse stiffness.
  • 3. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 2, including a low pressure turbine with an inlet, an outlet, and a low pressure turbine pressure ratio greater than 5:1, wherein said low pressure turbine pressure ratio is a ratio of a pressure measured prior to said inlet as related to a pressure at said outlet prior to any exhaust nozzle.
  • 4. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 3, including a ring gear having a ring gear lateral stiffness and a ring gear transverse stiffness and at least one of said ring gear lateral stiffness and said ring gear transverse stiffness is less than 12% of a respective one of said gear mesh lateral stiffness and said gear mesh transverse stiffness.
  • 5. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 4, wherein both said flexible support transverse stiffness and said flexible support lateral stiffness are less than 11% of a respective one of said frame transverse stiffness and said frame lateral stiffness.
  • 6. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 5, wherein said fan section has a low corrected fan tip speed less than 1,150 ft/sec, wherein said low corrected fan tip speed is an actual fan tip speed divided by [(Tram ° R)/(518.7° R)]0.5.
  • 7. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 6, wherein both said ring gear lateral stiffness and said ring gear transverse stiffness are less than 12% of a respective one of said gear mesh lateral stiffness and said gear mesh transverse stiffness.
  • 8. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 1, including a mid-turbine frame positioned between a first turbine section and a second turbine section having a plurality of airfoils positioned in a flow path.
  • 9. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 1, wherein said plurality of gears includes a gear mesh, said gear mesh having a gear mesh lateral stiffness and a gear mesh transverse stiffness, and said flexible support lateral stiffness and said flexible support transverse stiffness are less than 8% of a respective one of said gear mesh lateral stiffness and said gear mesh transverse stiffness.
  • 10. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 9, including a ring gear having a ring gear lateral stiffness and a ring gear transverse stiffness, at least one of said ring gear lateral stiffness and said ring gear transverse stiffness being less than 12% of a respective one of said gear mesh lateral stiffness and said gear mesh transverse stiffness.
  • 11. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 10, wherein said fan section has a low corrected fan tip speed less than 1,150 ft/sec, wherein said low corrected fan tip speed is an actual fan tip speed divided by [(Tram ° R)/(518.7° R)]0.5.
  • 12. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 10, further comprising a bypass ratio greater than 10.
  • 13. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 12, including a low pressure turbine with an inlet, an outlet, and a low pressure turbine pressure ratio greater than 5:1, wherein said low pressure turbine pressure ratio is a ratio of a pressure measured prior to said inlet as related to a pressure at said outlet prior to any exhaust nozzle.
  • 14. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 13, wherein a flexible coupling connects a sun gear of the plurality of gears in driving engagement with a first turbine section, and said flexible coupling having at least one of a flexible coupling transverse stiffness and a flexible coupling lateral stiffness that is less than 5% of a respective one of said gear mesh transverse stiffness and said gear mesh lateral stiffness.
  • 15. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 14, wherein both said flexible support transverse stiffness and said flexible support lateral stiffness are less than 11% of a respective one of said frame transverse stiffness and said frame lateral stiffness.
  • 16. The gas turbine engine of claim 15, further comprising a two stage high pressure turbine.
  • 17. A gas turbine engine, comprising: a fan having fan blades;a fan shaft drivingly connected to said fan;a gear system connected to said fan shaft in driving engagement with a first turbine section;a gear system flex mount arrangement, wherein said gear system flex mount arrangement accommodates misalignment of said fan shaft during operation and includes a frame for supporting said fan shaft defining a frame lateral stiffness and a frame transverse stiffness; anda flexible support which supports said gear system, said flexible support having both a flexible support lateral stiffness and a flexible support transverse stiffness that is less than 11% of a respective one of said frame lateral stiffness and said frame transverse stiffness.
  • 18. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 17, further comprising a fan pressure ratio of less than 1.45 measured across said fan blades alone and a low pressure turbine with an inlet, an outlet, and a low pressure turbine pressure ratio greater than 5:1, wherein said low pressure turbine pressure ratio is a ratio of a pressure measured prior to said inlet as related to a pressure at said outlet prior to any exhaust nozzle.
  • 19. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 18, further comprising a bypass ratio greater than 10 and wherein said gear system includes a gear reduction ratio of greater than 2.3.
  • 20. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 19, wherein said fan section has a low corrected fan tip speed less than 1,150 ft/sec, wherein said low corrected fan tip speed is an actual fan tip speed divided by [(Tram ° R)/(518.7° R)]0.5.
  • 21. The gas turbine engine of claim 19, wherein said gear system flex mount arrangement further includes a ring gear defining a ring gear transverse stiffness and a gear mesh defining a gear mesh transverse stiffness and said ring gear transverse stiffness is less than 12% of said gear mesh transverse stiffness.
  • 22. The gas turbine engine of claim 21, wherein said gear mesh defines a gear mesh lateral stiffness and said ring gear defines a ring gear lateral stiffness that is less than 12% of said gear mesh lateral stiffness.
  • 23. The gas turbine engine of claim 17, wherein said gear system flex mount arrangement further includes a ring gear defining a ring gear lateral stiffness and a gear mesh defining a gear mesh lateral stiffness and said ring gear lateral stiffness is less than 12% of said gear mesh lateral stiffness.
  • 24. The gas turbine engine of claim 23, wherein said ring gear define a ring gear transverse stiffness and said gear mesh defines a gear mesh transverse stiffness and said ring gear transverse stiffness is less than 12% of said gear mesh transverse stiffness.
  • 25. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 24, further comprising a bypass ratio greater than 10.
  • 26. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 25, wherein said gear system includes a gear reduction ratio of greater than 2.3.
  • 27. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 26, further including a fan pressure ratio of less than 1.45 measured across said fan blades alone.
  • 28. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 27, further including a low pressure turbine with an inlet, an outlet, and a low pressure turbine pressure ratio greater than 5:1, wherein said low pressure turbine pressure ratio is a ratio of a pressure measured prior to said inlet as related to a pressure at said outlet prior to any exhaust nozzle.
  • 29. The gas turbine engine as set forth in claim 28, wherein said fan section has a low corrected fan tip speed less than 1,150 ft/sec, wherein said low corrected fan tip speed is an actual fan tip speed divided by [(Tram ° R)/(518.7° R)]0.5.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present disclosure is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/604,811, filed Jan. 26, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/623,309, filed Sep. 20, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,133,729, issued Sep. 15, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/342,508, filed Jan. 3, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,297,916, issued Oct. 30, 2012, which claimed priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/494,453, filed Jun. 8, 2011.

US Referenced Citations (83)
Number Name Date Kind
2936655 Peterson et al. May 1960 A
3021731 Stoeckicht Feb 1962 A
3287906 McCormick Nov 1966 A
3352178 Lindgren et al. Nov 1967 A
3754484 Roberts Aug 1973 A
3892358 Gisslen Jul 1975 A
4084861 Greenberg et al. Apr 1978 A
4090416 Hicks May 1978 A
4130872 Harloff Dec 1978 A
4201513 Sales May 1980 A
4221114 Wilde et al. Sep 1980 A
4275557 Marvin et al. Jun 1981 A
4289360 Zirin Sep 1981 A
4825723 Martin May 1989 A
5361580 Ciokajlo et al. Nov 1994 A
5433674 Sheridan Jul 1995 A
5447411 Curley et al. Sep 1995 A
5486553 Deaner et al. Jan 1996 A
5524847 Brodell et al. Jun 1996 A
5539027 Deaner et al. Jul 1996 A
5778659 Duesler et al. Jul 1998 A
5857836 Stickler et al. Jan 1999 A
5915917 Eveker et al. Jun 1999 A
5975841 Lindemuth et al. Nov 1999 A
6073439 Beaven et al. Jun 2000 A
6223616 Sheridan May 2001 B1
6260351 Delano et al. Jul 2001 B1
6318070 Rey et al. Nov 2001 B1
6647707 Dev Nov 2003 B2
6663530 Poulin et al. Dec 2003 B2
6735954 MacFarlane et al. May 2004 B2
6814541 Evans et al. Nov 2004 B2
6855089 Poulin et al. Feb 2005 B2
6895741 Rago et al. May 2005 B2
7021042 Law Apr 2006 B2
7104918 Mitrovic Sep 2006 B2
7144349 Mitrovic Dec 2006 B2
7223197 Poulin et al. May 2007 B2
7393182 Matheny Jul 2008 B2
7451592 Taylor et al. Nov 2008 B2
7591754 Duong et al. Sep 2009 B2
7631484 Giffin et al. Dec 2009 B2
7665293 Wilson, Jr. et al. Feb 2010 B2
7704178 Sheridan et al. Apr 2010 B2
7824305 Duong et al. Nov 2010 B2
7828682 Smook Nov 2010 B2
7841163 Welch et al. Nov 2010 B2
7841165 Orlando et al. Nov 2010 B2
7926260 Sheridan et al. Apr 2011 B2
7959532 Suciu et al. Jun 2011 B2
8001763 Grabowski et al. Aug 2011 B2
8172717 Lopez et al. May 2012 B2
8205432 Sheridan Jun 2012 B2
8297916 McCune et al. Oct 2012 B1
8640336 Sheridan et al. Feb 2014 B2
9239012 McCune Jan 2016 B2
9523422 McCune et al. Dec 2016 B2
9752511 McCune et al. Sep 2017 B2
20070214795 Cooker et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225111 Duong et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080044276 McCune et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080098713 Orlando et al. May 2008 A1
20090056306 Suciu et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090090096 Sheridan Apr 2009 A1
20090183512 Suciu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090314881 Suciu et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100105516 Sheridan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100148396 Xie et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100331139 McCune Dec 2010 A1
20110106510 Poon May 2011 A1
20110116510 Breslin et al. May 2011 A1
20110130246 McCune et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110208400 Lickfold et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110286836 Davis Nov 2011 A1
20130219913 McCune et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130224003 Kupratis et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130287575 McCune et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130310213 Matsuoka et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130331223 McCune et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130331224 McCune et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140020404 Sheridan et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140174056 Suciu et al. Jun 2014 A1
20170335718 McCune Nov 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
2789325 Apr 2013 CA
2789465 Apr 2013 CA
0253548 Jan 1988 EP
2270361 Jan 2001 EP
2270361 Jan 2011 EP
2532841 Dec 2012 EP
2532841 Dec 2012 EP
2532858 Dec 2012 EP
2551488 Jan 2013 EP
1516041 Jun 1978 GB
2041090 Sep 1980 GB
2007038674 Apr 2007 WO
2013116262 Aug 2013 WO
2014047040 Mar 2014 WO
2014047040 Mar 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (165)
Entry
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response. General Electric Company., Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corp. , Patent Owner. IPR2017-00522. U.S. Pat. No. 8,899,915. Entered Apr. 19, 2017. pp. 1-54.
Mattingly, J.D. (1996). Elements of gas turbine propulsion. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. preface, pp. 719-720, 727-731, 735-738, 928-929, and 936-937.
Red Aviation. Part or Material Certification Form for various engine components. Dated Apr. 5, 2017.
Rethinking jet engines to make commercial aviation less of a threat to the climate (and the human respiratory system). Fortune. Retrieved Sep. 29, 2016 from: http://beta.fortune.com/change-the-world/united-technologies-8.
Gates, D. Bombardier flies at higher market. Seattle Times. Jul. 13, 2008. pp. C6.
Krauskopf, L. & Shumaker, L. (2014). GE exec says avoided geared design in jet engine battle with Pratt. Reuters. Sep. 15, 2014. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-general-electric-united-tech-engine-idUSKBN0HA2H620140915.
Grose, T.K. (2013). Reshaping flight for fuel efficiency: Five technologies on the runway. National Geographic. Retrieved Mar. 16, 2016 from: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/04/130423-reshaping-flight-for-fuel-efficiency.html.
European Search Report for European Application No. 16152821.1 dated Jun. 16, 2016.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16155413.4 dated Jun. 23, 2016.
Kurzke, J. (2008). Preliminary Design, Aero-engine design: From state of the art turbofans towards innovative architectures. pp. 1-72.
Leckie, F.A. and Dal Bello, D.J. (2009). Strength and stiffness of engineering systems. Mechanical Engineering Series. Springer. pp. 1-3.
Declaration of Magdy Attia In re U.S. Pat. 8,899,915. Executed Dec. 13, 2016. pp. 1-71.
Declaration of Raymond Drago. In re U.S. Pat. No. 8,899,915. Executed Dec. 9, 2016. pp. 1-38.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,899,915. General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent Owner. Filed Dec. 21, 2016.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 17199484.1 dated Feb. 7, 2018.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 15175203.7 dated Oct. 15, 2015.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 15175205.2 dated Oct. 15, 2015.
Grzegroz, L. and Friswell, M. Dynamics of a gear system with faults in meshing stiffness. Nonlinear Dynamics (2005)41. pp. 415-421.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 16174051 completed Oct. 21, 2016.
August, R. “Dynamics of Planetary Gear Trains”, Jun. 1984, NASA Contractor Report 3793, p. 13-16.
Grzegorz Litak et al.: “Dynamics of a Gear System with Faults in Meshing Stiffness”, Nonlinear Dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, DO, vol. 41, No. 4, Sep. 1, 2005, pp. 415-421.
Thulin, R.D., Howe, D.C., and Singer, I.D. (1982). Energy efficient engine: High pressure turbine detailed design report Prepared for NASA. NASA CR-165608. pp. 1-178.
NASA Conference Publication. Quiet, powered-lift propulsion. Cleveland, Ohio. Nov. 14-15, 1978.
“Civil Turbojet/Turbofan Specifications”, Jet Engine Specification Database (Apr. 3, 2005).
Kandebo, S.W. (1993). Geared-turbofan engine design targets cost, complexity. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 148(8), p. 32.
Hendricks, E.S. and Tong, M.T. (2012). Performance and weight estimates for an advanced open rotor engine. NASA/TM-2012-217710.
Guynn, M. D., Berton, J.J., Fisher, K. L., Haller, W.J., Tong, M. T., and Thurman, D.R. (2011). Refined exploration of turbofan design options for an advanced single-aisle transport. NASA/TM-2011-216883.
Zalud, T. (1998). Gears put a new spin on turbofan performance. Machine Design, 70(20), p. 104.
NASA, Engine Weight Model, Glenn Research Center, retrieved from, http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/turbwt.html, Mar. 11, 2016.
Singapore Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. 10201401514U dated May 26, 2017.
Warwick, G.(1993). Textron Lycoming LF507: Engine for Change. Flight International, p. 39-41, Aug. 31, 1993.
Warwick, G., “Civil Engines: Pratt & Whitney gears up for the future with GTF”, Flight International, Nov. 2007, accessed on Jul. 17, 2015 at http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/civil-engines-pratt-amp-whitney-gears-up-for-the-future-with-gtf.
Peter Coy, “The Little Gear That Could Reshape the Jet Engine”, Bloomberg Business, Oct. 15, 2015 [accessed on Mar. 24, 2017 at https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-15/pratt-s-purepower-gtf-jet-engine-innovation-took-almost-30-years].
Bill Read, “Powerplant Revolution”, AeroSpace, May 2014, pp. 28-31.
Andreas Peters et al., “Ultrashort Nacelles for Low Fan Pressure Ratio Propulsors”, Sep. 10, 2014, Journal of Turbomachinery 137(2), Abstract.
NASA, Quest for Performance: The Evolution of Modem Aircraft, Part II: The Jet Age, Chapter 10: Technology of the Jet Airplane, Turbojet and Turbofan Systems, Dec. 2006, NASA.
Jane's Aero-Engines, Issue Seven, Edited by Bill Gunston, Jane's Information Group Inc., Alexandria, Virginia, 2000, pp. 1-47, 61, and 464-512.
Boggia, S. and Rud, K., “Intercooled Recuperated Gas Turbine Engine Concept”, AIAA 2005-4192, 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Jul. 10-13, 2005, Tucson, Arizona, pp. 1-11.
Engber, et al., “Advanced Technologies for Next Generation Regional Jets—Survey of Research Activities at MTU Aero Engines”, ISABE-2007-1282, Proceedings: XVIII International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE), 18th ISABE Conference, Beijing, China, Sep. 2-7, 2007, pp. 1-11.
Kjelgaard, C., “Gearing Up for the GTF”, Aircraft Technology, Issue 105, Apr.-May 2010, pp. 86, 88, 90, 92-95.
Conference on Engineering and Physics: Synergy for Success 2006. Journal of Physics: Conference Series vol. 105. London, UK. Oct. 5, 2006.
Kurzke, J. (2009). Fundamental differences between conventional and geared turbofans. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. 2009, Orlando, Florida.
Agarwal, B.D. and Broutman, L.J. (1990). Analysis and performance of fiber composites, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York: New York.
Carney, K., Pereira, M. Revilock, and Matheny, P. Jet engine fan blade containment using two alternate geometries. 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference.
Faghri, A. (1995). Heat pipe and science technology. Washington, D.C.: Taylor & Francis.
Hess, C. (1998). Pratt & Whitney develops geared turbofan. Flug Revue 43(7). Oct. 1998.
Grady, J.E., Weir, D.S., Lamoureux, M.G., and Martinez, M.M. (2007). Engine noise research in NASA's quiet aircraft technology project. Papers from the International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE). 2007.
Griffiths, B. (2005). Composite fan blade containment case. Modern Machine Shop. Retrieved from: http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/composite-fan-blade-containment-case.
Hall, C.A. and Crichton, D. (2007). Engine design studies for a silent aircraft. Journal of Turbomachinery, 129, 479-487.
Haque, A. and Shamsuzzoha, M., Hussain, F., and Dean, D. (2003). S20-glass/epoxy polymer nanocomposites: Manufacturing, structures, thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Composite Materials, 37(20), 1821-1837.
Brennan, P.J. and Kroliczek, E.J. (1979). Heat pipe design handbook. Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration by B & K Engineering, Inc. Jun. 1979.
Horikoshi, S. and Serpone, N. (2013). Introduction to nanoparticles. Microwaves in nanoparticle synthesis. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Kerrebrock, J.L. (1977). Aircraft engines and gas turbines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Xie, M. (2008). Intelligent engine systems: Smart case system. NASA/CR-2008-215233.
Knip, Jr., G. (1987). Analysis of an advanced technology subsonic turbofan incorporating revolutionary materials. NASA Technical Memorandum. May 1987.
Willis, W.S. (1979). Quiet clean short-haul experimental engine (QCSEE) final report NASA/CR-159473.
Kojima, Y., Usuki, A. Kawasumi, M., Okada, A., Fukushim, Y., Kurauchi, T., and Kamigaito, O. (1992). Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid. Journal of Materials Research, 8(5), 1185-1189.
Kollar, L.P. and Springer, G.S. (2003). Mechanics of composite structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ramsden, J.M. (Ed). (1978). The new European airliner. Flight International, 113(3590). Jan. 7, 1978.
Langston, L. and Faghri, A. Heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Prepared for Advanced Turbine Systems Annual Program Review. Morgantown, West Virginia. Oct. 17-19, 1995.
Oates, G.C. (Ed). (1989). Aircraft propulsion systems and technology and design. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics, Inc.
Lau, K., Gu, C., and Hui, D. (2005). A critical review on nanotube and nanotube/nanoclay related polymer composite materials. Composites: Part B 37(2006) 425-436.
Shorter Oxford English dictionary, 6th Edition. (2007). vol. 2, N-Z. p. 1888.
Lynwander, P. (1983). Gear drive systems: Design and application. New York, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Pyrograf-III Carbon Nanofiber. Product guide. Retrieved from: http://pyrografproducts.com/Merchant5/merchant.mvc?Screen=cp_nanofiber.
Nanocor Technical Data for Epoxy Nanocomposites using Nanomer 1.30E Nanoclay. Nnacor, Inc.
Ratna, D. (2009). Handbook of thermoset resins. Shawbury, UK: iSmithers.
Silverstein, C.C., Gottschlich, J.M., and Meininger, M. The feasibility of heat pipe turbine vane cooling. Presented at the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, The Hague, Netherlands. Jun. 13-16, 1994.
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 11th Ed. (2009). p. 824.
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 10th Ed. (2001). p. 1125-1126.
Whitaker, R. (1982). ALF 502: plugging the turbofan gap. Flight International, p. 237-241, Jan. 30, 1982.
Hughes, C. (2010). Geared turbofan technology. NASA Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project. Green Aviation Summit. NASA Ames Research Center. Sep. 8-9, 2010.
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/131,876.
Cusick, M. (1981). Avco Lycoming's ALF 502 high bypass fan engine. Society of Automotive Engineers, inc. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 7-10, 1981.
Fledderjohn, K.R. (1983). The TFE731-5: Evolution of a decade of business jet service. SAE Technical Paper Series. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 12-15, 1983.
Dickey, T.A. and Dobak, E.R. (1972). The evolution and development status of ALF 502 turbofan engine. National Aerospace Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting. San Diego, California. Oct. 2-5, 1972.
Gunston, B. (Ed.) (2000). Jane's aero-engines, Issue seven. Coulsdon, Surrey, UK: Jane's Information Group Limited.
Ivchenko—Progress D-436. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 8, 2012.
Ivchenko—Progress AI-727M. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 27, 2011.
Ivchenko—Progress D-727. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 7, 2007.
Turbomeca Aubisque. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Nov. 2, 2009.
Aviadvigatel D-110. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jun. 1, 2010.
Rolls-Royce M45H. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 24, 2010.
Honeywell LF502. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012.
Honeywell LF507. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Feb. 9, 2012.
Honeywell TFE731. Jane's Aero-engines, Aero-engines—Turbofan. Jul. 18, 2012.
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review. General Electric Company., Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corp., Patent Owner. IPR2017-00522. U.S. Pat. No. 8,899,915. Entered Jun. 23, 2017. pp. 1-18.
Litak, G. and Friswell, M.I. (2004). Dynamics of a gear system with faults in meshing stiffness. Nonlinear Dynamics (2005) 41: 415-421.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 16159312.4 dated Jun. 8, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2015/012346 dated Aug. 4, 2016.
Abhijit Guha, “Optimum Fan Pressure Ratio for Bypass Engines with Separate or Mixed Exhaust Streams”, Sep.-Oct. 2001, Journal of Propulsion and Power 17(5), p. 1117-1122.
Type Certificate Data Sheet A23WE, Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, Oct. 25, 2001, pp. 1-23.
Unicom, Flying Magazine, Nov. 2002, vol. 129, No. 11, p. 68.
Du, S., “Modelling of spur gear mesh stiffness and static transmission error”, 1998, Proc Instn Mech Engrs, vol. 212 Part C.
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 15777258.3 dated Apr. 10, 2017.
Rauch, Dale, “Design Study of an Air Pump and Integral Lift Engine ALF-504 Using the Lycoming 502 Core,” NASA Report CR-120992, Jul. 31, 1972.
McCune, M.E. (1993). Initial test results of 40,000 horsepower fan drive gear system for advanced ducted propulsion systems. AIAA 29th Joint Conference and Exhibit. Jun. 28-30, 1993. pp. 1-10.
Wendus, B.E., Stark, D.F., Holler, R.P., and Funkhouser, M.E. (2003). “Follow-on technology requirement study for advanced subsonic transport”. NASA/CR-2003-212467.
Garrett, (1987). “TFE731”.
Roux, E (2007). “Turbofan and turbojet engines database handbook”. Editions Elodie Roux. Blagnac: France. p. 41-42; p. 465; p. 468-469.
Kurzke, J. (2009). Fundamental differences between conventional and geared turbofans. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. 2009, GT2009-59745, Orlando, Florida.
Mattingly, J.D. (1996). Elements of gas turbine propulsion. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Riegler, C. (2007). The Geared Turbofan Technology—Opportunities, Challenged and Readiness Status. Proceedings CEAS 2007.
Waters, M.H. and Schairer, E.T. (1977). Analysis of turbofan propulsion system weight and dimensions. NASA Technical Memorandum. NASA TM-X-73. Jan. 1977. p. 199.
Willis, W.S. (1979). Quiet clean short-haul experimental engine (QCSEE) final report. NASA/CR-159473 pp. 1-289.
Sweetman, B. and Sutton, O. (1998). Pratt & Whitney's surprise leap. Interavia Business & Technology, 53.621, p. 25.
Gunston, B. (Ed.) (2000). Jane's aero-engines, Issue seven. Coulsdon, Surrey, UK: Jane's Information Group Limited. pp. 510-512.
Brines, G.L. (1990). The turbofan of tomorrow. Mechanical Engineering: The Journal of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers,108(8), 65-67.
Daly, M. Ed. (2010). Jane's Aero-Engine. Issue Twenty-seven. Mar. 2010. p. 633-636.
Cusick, M. (1981). Avco Lycoming's ALF 502 high bypass fan engine. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Business Aircraft Meeting & Exposition. Wichita, Kansas. Apr. 7-10, 1981. pp. 1-9.
Lynwander, P. (1983). Gear drive systems: Design and application. New York, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 145, 355-358.
Hill, P.G. and Peterson, C.R. (1992). Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Propulsion, Second Edition. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. pp. 400-406.
Kasuba, R. and August, R. (1984). Gear Mesh Stiffness and Load Sharing in Planetary Gearing. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. New York, NY.
Hill, P.G. and Peterson, C.R. (1970). Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Propulsion. Addison-Wesley Series in Aerospace Science. Chapter 9-4.
Leckie, F.A. and Dal Bello, D.J. (2009). Strength and stiffness of engineering systems. Mechanical Engineering Series. Springer. pp. 1-10, 48-51.
Dudley, D.W., Ed. (1954). Handbook of practical gear design. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company, Inc. pp. 3.96-3.102 and 8.12-8.18.
Dudley, D.W., Ed. (1962). Gear handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. pp. 3.14-3.18 and 12.7-12.21.
Gray, D.E. (1978). Energy efficient engine preliminary design and integration studies. Prepared for NASA. NASA CR-135396. Nov. 1978. pp. 1-366.
Reynolds, C.N. (1985). Advanced prop-fan engine technology (APET) single- and counter-rotation gearbox/pitch change mechanism. Prepared for NASA. NASA CR-168114 (vol. I). Jul. 1985. pp. 1-295.
Reynolds, C.N. (1985). Advanced prop-fan engine technology (APET) single- and counter-rotation gearbox/pitch change mechanism. Prepared for NASA. NASA CR-168114 (vol. II). Jul. 1985. pp. 1-175.
U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Aviation Administration Type Certificate Data Sheet No. E6WE. Dated: May 9, 2000. p. 1-9.
Honeywell Sabreliner 65 TFE731-3 to -3D Engine Upgrade Program. Oct. 2005. pp. 1-4.
Honeywell Learjet 31 and 35/36 TFE731-2 to 2C Engine Upgrade Program. Sep. 2005. pp. 1-4.
Kurzke, J. (2012). GasTurb 12: Design and off-design performance of gas turbines. Retrieved from: https://www.scribd.com/document/153900429/GasTurb-12.
Ahmad, F. and Mizramoghadam, A.V. (1999). Single v. two stage high pressure turbine design of modern aero angines. ASME. Prestend at the International Gast Turbine & Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition. Indianapolis, Indiana. Jun. 7-10, 1999. pp. 1-9.
English translation of Measurement and calculation methodology on TFE731-2, TFE731-3A and TFE731-3D models.
English translation of Expert certificate concerning the technical nature of the drawings used in the measurement and calculation methodology.
Declaration of Raymond Drago. In re U.S. Appl. No. 8,297,916. IPR2018-01172. Executed May 29, 2018. pp. 1-115.
Parker, R.G. and Lin, J. (2001). Modeling, modal properties, and mesh stiffness variation instabilities of planetary gears. Prepared for NASA. NASA/CR-2001-210939. May 2001. pp. 1-111.
Declaration of Courtney H. Bailey. In re U.S. Appl. No. 8,511,605. Executed Jul. 19, 2016. pp. 1-4.
Mancuso, J.R. and Corcoran, J.P. (2003). What are the differences in high performance flexible couplings for turbomachinery? Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Turbomachinery Symposium. 2003. pp. 189-207.
Dudley, D.W., Ed. (1994). Practical gear design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. pp. 119-124.
Daly, M. and Gunston, B. (2008). Jane's Aero-Engines. Pratt & Whitney PW8000. Issue Twenty-three.
Notice of Opposition to Patent No. EP2811120. United Technologies Corporation opposed by Rolls Royce. dated Apr. 12, 2018.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,297,916. General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent Owner. IPR2018-01171. Filed May 30, 2018.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,297,916. General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent Owner. IPR2018-01172. Filed May 30, 2018.
Notice of Opposition to Patent No. EP2949882. United Technologies Corporation opposed by Rolls Royce. dated Aug. 23, 2017.
English Translation of Notice of Opposition to Patent No. EP2811120. United Technologies Corporation opposed by Safran Aircraft Engines. dated Jul. 12, 2017.
English Translation of Notice of Opposition to Patent No. EP299882. United Technologies Corporation opposed by Safran Aircraft Engines. dated May 23 2018.
Wilfert, G. (2008). Geared fan. Aero-Engine Design: From State of the Art Turbofans Towards Innovative Architectures, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Belgium, Mar. 3-7, 2008. pp. 1-26.
Adams, Eric. (2016) The World's Hugest Jet Engine Is Wider Than A 737s Fuselage. Apr. 28, 2016. www.wired.com/2016/04/worlds-hugest-jet-engine-wider-737s-fuselage/ accessed on Apr. 28, 2016).
Jane's Aero-Engines, Issue Seven, Edited by Bill Gunston, Jane's Information Group Inc., Alexandria, Virginia, 2000, pp. 1-67, 464-470, 475-476, 482-488, 494-508, 510-512.
Third Party Observations and Concise Description of Relevance of Document for U.S. Appl. No. 15/816,487 dated Jul. 25, 2018.
AGMA Standard (1999). Flexible couplings—Mass elastic properties and other characteristics. Alexandria, VA: American Gear Manufacturers Association. pp. 1-46.
Wikipedia. Stiffness. Retrieved Jun. 28, 2018 from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiffness.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/494,453 filed Jun. 8, 2011 titled Geared Engine Flexible Mount Arrangement.
Damerau, J. (2014) What is the mesh stiffness of gears? Screen shot of query submitted by Vahid Dabbagh, answered by Dr. Jochan Damerau, Research General Manager at Bosch Corp., Japan. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_mesh_stiffness_of_gears.
Third Party Observations and Concise Description of Relevance of Document for U.S. Appl. No. 15/856,396 dated Aug. 31, 2018.
Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo v. Biomet Inc., 156 F.3d 1154 (1998).
Third Party Observations and Concise Description of Relevance of Document for U.S. Appl. No. 15/881,240 dated Aug. 31, 2018.
Third Party Observations and Concise Description of Relevance of Document for U.S. Appl. No. 15/185,292 dated Jul. 5, 2018.
Third Party Observations for European Patent Application No. 16159312.4 filed Jun. 22, 2018. Dated Jul. 3, 2018.
Defeo, A. and Kulina, M. (1977). Quiet clean short-haul experimental engine (QCSEE) main reduction gears detailed design final report. Prepared for NASA. NASA-CR-134872. Jul. 1977. pp. 1-221.
Amezketa, M., Iriarte, X., Ros, J., and Pintor, J. (2009). Dynamic model of a helical gear pair with backlash and angle0varying mesh stiffness. Multibody Dynamics 2009, ECCOMAS Thematic Conference. 2009. pp. 1-36.
Singh, A. (2005). Application of a system level model to study the planetary load sharing behavior. Jounal of Mechanical Design. vol. 127. May 2005. pp. 469-76.
Smith-Boyd, L. And Pike, J. (1986). Expansion of epicyclic gear dynamic analysis program. Prepared for NASA. NASA CR-179563. Aug. 1986. pp. 1-98.
Wikipedia. Torsion spring. Retrieved Jun. 29, 2018 from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_spring.
AGMA Standard (2006). Design manual for enclosed epicyclic gear drives. Alexandria, VA: American Gear Manufacturers Association. pp. 1-104.
AGMA Standard (1997). Design and selection of components for enclosed gear drives. Alexandria, VA: American Gear Manufacturers Association. pp. 1-48.
Third Party Observations for European Patent Application No. 11250208.3 filed Jul. 20, 2018. dated Jul. 26, 2018.
Third Party Observations for European Patent Application No. 17199484.1 filed Jul. 5, 2018. dated Jul. 12, 2018.
Third Party Observations for European Patent Application No. 13775188.9 filed Sep. 10, 2018. dated Sep. 17, 2018.
Notice of Opposition for European Patent No. 3051078 dated Jul. 31, 2018.
Decision to Deny Institution—Case IPR2018-01172, Patent 8,297,916 B1. General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent owner. Entered Nov. 29, 2018.
Decision to Deny Institution—Case IPR2018-01171, Patent 8,297,916 B1. General Electric Company, Petitioner, v. United Technologies Corporation, Patent owner. Entered Nov. 29, 2018.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160053635 A1 Feb 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61494453 Jun 2011 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14604811 Jan 2015 US
Child 14859381 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13623309 Sep 2012 US
Child 14604811 US
Parent 13342508 Jan 2012 US
Child 13623309 US