The explosion in the popularity of pick-up trucks and/or sport utility trucks (SUTs) has fueled a proliferation of new body configurations. Trucks are offered as standard cabs, king cabs, crew cabs, SPORT TRACS, and the like. Likewise, truck interiors have been adapted to meet the needs for more comfort, more passenger capacity, and the like. One area of the pick-up truck that has yet to undergo a similar evolution is the cargo bed itself.
It is ironic that the most utilitarian element of what is essentially a utilitarian vehicle is, in practical terms, not especially useful. As currently conceived, the standard full-sized pick-up bed is little more than a large empty volume with a few tie-down points scattered along the perimeter of its interior walls or along a bed rail. There is an enormous opportunity to improve the utility and ease of use of a truck bed.
Some trucks are used primarily for work and others primarily for recreation. Many trucks do double-duty supporting both of these spheres of activity. One of the most glaring deficiencies of current bed design is that they are not readily adaptable to the wide variety of applications required by the end user. A truck bed should be able to support and accommodate the very different requirements that are associated with a diverse range of activities.
Generally speaking, bed usage may be grouped into three broad categories: hauling, securing, and separating items in the payload. Most truck users need to perform each of these tasks with some frequency. Yet the demands placed on the bed for hauling are significantly different from those needed to secure or separate items in and around the bed.
When hauling yard waste, plywood, recreational gear, and other items, the ideal condition is to maximize the interior volume of the bed and to maintain an easily accessible loading surface. When securing individual objects in the bed, such as dirt bikes, ATVs, air tanks, furniture, and other items, the ideal condition is to have multiple sturdy tie-down points in close proximity to the object being secured. When hauling and securing combinations of items—heavy objects and fragile equipment, for example—it becomes necessary to separate these items from one another.
This situation has led to a brisk business in after-market systems created by after-market manufacturers. However, while many of these systems are at least partially effective, they are not necessarily designed to interface with the truck in an optimum manner from a functional, structural, and aesthetic standpoint.
An object of the invention is to provide a truly flexible cargo bed tie-down system that allows the user to easily change, adjust, customize, and adapt his or her vehicle to specific needs at any given moment, and that interfaces with the rest of the truck in an optimum manner from a functional, structural, and aesthetic standpoint.
One embodiment of the invention provides a vehicle comprising a side wall construction enclosing a cargo bed at a side of the cargo bed. The side wall construction includes an outer portion which runs generally vertically at an outer portion of the vehicle, and a top portion which runs generally horizontally from the outer portion toward a longitudinal center of the vehicle. A tie-down rail is mounted adjacent to the top portion such that a part of the top portion overhangs at least a portion of the tie-down rail. The tie-down rail is configured to accept a tie-down fitting and includes a slotted opening generally aligned with an interior edge of the top portion. This permits tie-down rail(s) (also called track(s)) to blend in with the truck, which improves functionality. This is in contrast to currently available after-market products. Such after-market products and existing trucks are not necessarily designed to interface in an optimum manner, from a functional, structural and aesthetic standpoint.
The invention will be described in further detail below in conjunction with the following drawings:
As shown in
An important feature of the invention is that the tracks are outside of the passenger compartment (in the
For example, the exterior contour of track 141 is flush with cargo bed 110. In
This design permits the tracks to blend in with the body of the truck, which improves functionality because the tracks do not obstruct placement of items into or on the truck. Also, in the invention, the portions of the body of the truck that support the tracks are specifically designed to accommodate the tracks and to take large loads, which thus allows the tracks to support or secure large loads. As discussed above, this is in contrast to currently available after-market products which sit on top of the body of the truck. Such after-market products and existing trucks may not necessarily be designed to accommodate each other in an optimum manner, from a structural viewpoint.
The contour of the adjacent portions of the body of the truck can be formed by, for example, structural steel, aluminum and other material that forms part of the structural part of the body, sheet metal, sheet aluminum or other material, and/or plastic (either separate or with a track encapsulated). The track slots can be pointed in any direction, for example, upward, downward, outboard, inboard, rearward, forward, or at an angle. Also, when the tracks are not in use, the tracks can be covered with a protective strip of, for example, rubber or plastic, which fits into the slot opening.
In this particular embodiment of the invention, the geometry of the tracks is similar to the geometry of channels manufactured for industrial framing applications (for example for supporting pipes and electrical lines). This allows a user to employ a wide variety of commercially available fittings to customize and adapt the tie-down arrangement to the particular task at hand.
To use the assembly, the nut 212 is placed into the channel (or track), the washer 216 is placed on a threaded part of the eye 214, and then the nut 212 is turned 90 degrees such that the grooves 212A, 212B in the nut mate with the in-turned lips 145A and 145B of the channel. Then, the eye is screwed into the nut until tight. This squeezes the track between the nut and the washer/eye assembly. The pressure locks the entire assembly to the track. The fitting is removed by loosening the nut/eye assembly, and turning the nut 90 degrees.
It will be appreciated that the fittings described in this patent specification can be used in conjunction with, for example, ropes, straps, rubber tie-downs, and the like, to secure objects to tie-down points throughout the cargo bed.
The tracks at the side of the bed and/or the tracks at the bottom of the bed, can also be used to secure a cargo divider, as shown in
(1) the first member 952, the second member 954, and the crossbar member 948 lie in the primary plane of the tailgate 130 to act as an upright for loads when the tailgate 130 is vertical (as shown in
(2) the first member 952, the second member 954, and the crossbar member 948 lie in the primary plane of the tailgate 130 to act as an extension of the tailgate 130 for longer loads when the tailgate 130 is horizontal (as shown in
(3) the first member 952, the second member 954, and the crossbar member 948 lie in a plane perpendicular to the primary plane of the tailgate 130 to act as an upright (or rear support) when the tailgate is horizontal (as shown in
(4) the first member 952, the second member 954, and the crossbar member 948 lie in a plane perpendicular to the primary plane of the tailgate 130 to act as a step when the tailgate 130 is horizontal (as shown in
The first and second members 952 and 954 can be stored within the tailgate 130 by pushing them into the tailgate (in which case the crossbar member 948 simply acts as a track on the free end of the tailgate similar to track 148 in
The crossbar members 1100 and 1200 can support, for example, a beam 1310 that can be cantilevered near the rear end of the truck to support a pulley system 1320.
The
As shown in the Figures, there are four major pieces to this design. A center shaft 1910 is provided with an eye 1920 (or other type of fitting/connection) on one end, a square shank 1930 in the middle, and a pin 1940 on the other end. Eye 1920, shank 1930, and pin 1940 are formed together as one piece. A rectangular lock bar 1950 is provided with a hole the same diameter as the pin end 1940 of the center shaft 1910. A spring locking ring 1960 has a square hole to match the shank 1930 of the center shaft and includes a recessed area which houses an internal spring 1968, notches for fingers, and a boss 1962 to engage the track opening. A set screw 1952, or pin, secures the lock bar 1950 to the center shaft. In this particular configuration, a link 1922 is attached to the eye 1920 of the center shaft.
To assemble the unit, the spring 1968 is slid onto the center shaft 1910 stopping against a larger diameter near the eye end. The locking ring 1960 is then slid over the square shank 1930 of the center shaft 1910. Then, the lock bar 1950 is installed over the center shaft pin 1940, and is aligned so that the long side of the lock bar 1950 is perpendicular to a long side of the locking ring boss 1962 and is screwed (or pinned) in place by screw 1952.
To install the fitting 1900, the entire unit is positioned in a track 2020, opposite a track hole 2010, with the lock bar 1950 aligned with the track, as shown in
This embodiment thus provides an arrangement that is simple, easy to use, and provides very positive locking action. As long as the boss 1962 holds the lock bar 1950 from rotating, the only way to move or remove the tie-down fitting would require destruction or gross distortion of the track and/or tie-down fitting.
To use this fitting 2100, the fitting is positioned over the track 2220 above a track hole 2210, as shown in
To remove this tie-down, the spring 2130 (and the locking bar 2150) is rotated counter-clockwise.
Numerous other types of fittings may be used with the invention, for example, supports for plate glass racks, supports for ladders, and the like. Suitable off-the-shelf fittings are readily available for strut systems and are offered by, for example, Unistrut (Wayne, Mich.); Midland-Ross Corp., Superstrut Division, (Oakland, Calif.); and B-Line Systems, Inc. (Highland, Ill.).
The invention is not limited to the preferred embodiments described above. For example, a track could be mounted directly to the tailgate without the use of members 952 and 954. Variations and modifications of the invention will occur to those in the field, in light of the above teachings. The invention is therefore defined by reference to the following claims.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/874,979, filed Jun. 7, 2001, and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,846,140, which in turn claims benefit of priority U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/242,724, filed Oct. 25, 2000. The entire contents of both of these applications are incorporated herein by reference. The present invention relates generally to the field of trucks. More specifically, the present invention relates to a flexible tie-down system for trucks.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2110435 | Albin | Mar 1938 | A |
2602691 | Doty | Jul 1952 | A |
2685848 | Meighan et al. | Aug 1954 | A |
2688289 | Sterling | Sep 1954 | A |
2696139 | Attwood | Dec 1954 | A |
2736272 | Elsner | Feb 1956 | A |
3005292 | Reiland | Oct 1961 | A |
3053355 | Attwood | Sep 1962 | A |
3169792 | Solano Viquez | Feb 1965 | A |
3241501 | Welton | Mar 1966 | A |
3478995 | Lautzenhiser et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3643973 | Bott | Feb 1972 | A |
3658012 | Caringi | Apr 1972 | A |
3722910 | Heckenlaible | Mar 1973 | A |
3802138 | McCarter | Apr 1974 | A |
3831976 | Iden, Sr. | Aug 1974 | A |
3877671 | Underwood et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3951444 | Shull | Apr 1976 | A |
3972500 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4109891 | Grendahl | Aug 1978 | A |
4168668 | Grube et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4226465 | McCullough | Oct 1980 | A |
4239139 | Bott | Dec 1980 | A |
4248558 | Lechner | Feb 1981 | A |
4270681 | Ingram | Jun 1981 | A |
4278376 | Hunter | Jul 1981 | A |
4285379 | Kowalski | Aug 1981 | A |
4396324 | Ellis | Aug 1983 | A |
4410298 | Kowalski | Oct 1983 | A |
4449875 | Brunelle | May 1984 | A |
4469261 | Stapleton et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4500020 | Rasor | Feb 1985 | A |
4545697 | Verdenne et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4575295 | Rebentisch | Mar 1986 | A |
4630982 | Fenner | Dec 1986 | A |
4666355 | Stover | May 1987 | A |
4708549 | Jensen | Nov 1987 | A |
4717298 | Bott | Jan 1988 | A |
4739528 | Allen | Apr 1988 | A |
4741582 | Peroni | May 1988 | A |
4778092 | Grace | Oct 1988 | A |
4784552 | Rebentisch | Nov 1988 | A |
4827742 | McDonald | May 1989 | A |
4840525 | Rebentisch | Jun 1989 | A |
4850063 | Abbate | Jul 1989 | A |
4850769 | Matthews | Jul 1989 | A |
4887947 | Bott | Dec 1989 | A |
4911348 | Rasor | Mar 1990 | A |
4915342 | Nilsson | Apr 1990 | A |
4941702 | Southward | Jul 1990 | A |
D310017 | Matthews | Aug 1990 | S |
4948313 | Zankovich | Aug 1990 | A |
4950099 | Roellin | Aug 1990 | A |
4955771 | Bott | Sep 1990 | A |
4961553 | Todd | Oct 1990 | A |
4969784 | Yanke | Nov 1990 | A |
4984726 | Marshall | Jan 1991 | A |
5044856 | Jerabek | Sep 1991 | A |
5137403 | McCaffrey | Aug 1992 | A |
5143415 | Boudah | Sep 1992 | A |
5154385 | Lindberg et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5165628 | Todd et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5188479 | Nehls | Feb 1993 | A |
5199836 | Gogarty | Apr 1993 | A |
5209619 | Rinderer | May 1993 | A |
5228736 | Dutton | Jul 1993 | A |
5259711 | Beck | Nov 1993 | A |
5271586 | Schmidt | Dec 1993 | A |
5297888 | Nehls | Mar 1994 | A |
5316357 | Schroeder | May 1994 | A |
5366327 | Nelson | Nov 1994 | A |
5370488 | Sykes | Dec 1994 | A |
5409335 | Beck | Apr 1995 | A |
5411356 | Travis et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433550 | Huber | Jul 1995 | A |
5433566 | Bradley | Jul 1995 | A |
5494388 | Stevens | Feb 1996 | A |
5533848 | Davis | Jul 1996 | A |
5560666 | Vieira et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5628598 | Hofle | May 1997 | A |
5655865 | Plank et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5674033 | Ruegg | Oct 1997 | A |
5676508 | Weicht | Oct 1997 | A |
5690460 | Attanasio | Nov 1997 | A |
5704571 | Vargo | Jan 1998 | A |
5765978 | Looker et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775652 | Crawshaw et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5779412 | Nagai et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794901 | Sigel | Aug 1998 | A |
5820322 | Hermann et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823724 | Lee | Oct 1998 | A |
5823727 | Lee | Oct 1998 | A |
5827023 | Stull | Oct 1998 | A |
5893538 | Onishi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5915900 | Boltz | Jun 1999 | A |
5947356 | DeLong | Sep 1999 | A |
5961263 | Nunez | Oct 1999 | A |
5975822 | Ruff | Nov 1999 | A |
6010287 | Sommermeyer et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017071 | Morghen | Jan 2000 | A |
6022164 | Tsui et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6050763 | Swailes | Apr 2000 | A |
RE36681 | Rinderer | May 2000 | E |
6059498 | Ostrowski | May 2000 | A |
6086300 | Frohlich | Jul 2000 | A |
6113328 | Chaucherty | Sep 2000 | A |
6196777 | Price | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213539 | Williams et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238153 | Karrer | May 2001 | B1 |
6250861 | Whitehead | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260813 | Whitcomb | Jul 2001 | B1 |
D446442 | Simpson | Aug 2001 | S |
6270301 | Dunlop | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290426 | van Gijsel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6334750 | Hsieh | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336766 | De Villele | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336779 | Jakob et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338599 | Uno | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338649 | Smith | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6439814 | Floe | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6585465 | Hammond et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592310 | Hyp et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6644901 | Breckel | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6846140 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6910609 | Williams et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
20020048495 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020164225 | Snyder et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20050036848 | Cunningham et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050145662 | Williams et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2004094194 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050117991 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60242724 | Oct 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09874979 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 11030140 | US |