The present application is a U.S. National Phase filing of International Application No. PCT/EP2013/054796, filed on Mar. 8, 2013, designating the United States of America and claiming priority to French Patent Application 1252352 filed Mar. 15, 2012, and this application claims priority to and the benefit of the above-identified applications, which are both incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
The present invention relates to the field of containers for cosmetic products. In particular, the present invention relates to the field of containers with an applicator cap.
There are containers with applicator caps for cosmetic products. The cosmetic products in question are generally nail varnishes, mascara, liquid liner (more often known as “eye-liner”) and lip gloss (sometimes simply called “gloss”).
A container with an applicator cap for nail varnish usually takes the form of a transparent glass bottle acting as a reservoir for the nail varnish. The bottle comprises an opening within which a straight applicator brush can be contained and can pass, said brush being fixed to the end of a rod, which is fixed in turn to the cap.
A drawback of this type of nail varnish container is the weight involved in using glass.
A container with an applicator cap for mascara usually takes the form of a rigid cylindrical tube, generally made of polypropylene, acting as a reservoir for the mascara. The cylindrical tube comprises an opening within which a round applicator brush can be contained and can pass, said brush being fixed to the end of a rod, which is fixed in turn to the cap.
A container with an applicator cap for liquid liner generally has the same shape and design as a container with an applicator cap for mascara, except that the round applicator brush is replaced by a straight applicator brush.
A container with an applicator cap for lip gloss generally has the same shape and design as a container with an applicator cap for mascara, except that the round applicator brush is replaced by an applicator pad.
A drawback of this type of container is that some of the cosmetic product becomes inaccessible for transfer to the applicator, accumulates inside the cylindrical tube around the opening, and dries out there.
Furthermore, it would be advantageous to be able to have a single type of container with an applicator cap for all these different types of cosmetic; then only the applicator cap would differ.
In order to take into account the disposable nature of the container, it is advantageous for the container to be made with inexpensive materials, a small number of manufacturing steps and automatable production methods.
One objective of the present invention is to mitigate at least one of the drawbacks of the prior art. In particular, one objective of the present invention is to propose a container with an applicator cap which is equally suitable for nail varnish, mascara, liquid liner and lip gloss.
Another objective is to propose a lighter nail varnish container.
Yet another objective is to propose a container for mascara, liquid liner and lip gloss which allows optimal use of the quantity of cosmetic product contained in the reservoir.
For this purpose, the present invention proposes a container with an applicator cap for a cosmetic product, comprising:
Such a container can be used for a diverse range of cosmetic products. Indeed, the shape of the container and the composition of the tube are compatible with nail varnishes, mascaras, liquid liners and lip glosses.
Other optional and non-limiting features are:
Other objectives, features and advantages will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description with reference to the drawings given by way of example and in a non-limiting manner, in which:
A container with an applicator cap for cosmetic product is described below with reference to
This container 1 comprises a flexible tube 3 having a skirt 31 and a tube head 32. The tube head 32 comprises a shoulder part 321 which is connected to a neck 322 having an opening 3221. The tube head 32 is connected to the skirt 31 by the shoulder part 321. The flexible tube 3 acts as a reservoir for containing the cosmetic product.
The term “flexible tube” is to be understood in the context of the invention as a container that can be deformed under pressure exerted on its outer surface by the user.
The flexible tube 3 can be made from a tube with a circular, oval or elliptical cross section, forming the skirt 31. The tube is cut transversely at the two ends thereof. One end 34 is sealed by compression perpendicular to a diameter of the cross section of the tube and by making a seam at this end to seal it against the cosmetic product.
The skirt 31 is made of a multilayered plastics material 4 comprising at least one barrier layer 41. The multilayered material 4 must allow a percentage loss of weight of the cosmetic product in four weeks of less than 1%.
The barrier layer(s) 41 can be made of a material selected from: ethylene-vinyl alcohol (EVOH), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or polyamide (PA), and preferably EVOH.
The barrier layer 41 makes it possible to avoid evaporation of volatile compounds contained in the cosmetic products. For example, for nail varnishes, the solvent is an alcohol solvent and is therefore very volatile. In particular, nail varnishes mainly have ethyl acetate and/or butyl acetate as the volatile component. These two components usually represent around 70% by weight of the nail varnish. Another volatile component that can be contained in a nail varnish is isopropanol. Nail varnishes are usually contained in glass containers because the solvent they contain can pass through the walls of flexible tubes made of organic material. Other volatile compounds can be involved, such as the aromatic compounds present in lip glosses, or formaldehyde.
The materials constituting the barrier layer(s) constitute a non-negligible proportion of the cost of materials. The aim is therefore to reduce the thickness of barrier layer used while preserving their function of preventing the evaporation of the volatile compounds. In the case of a single barrier layer 41, the thickness of the barrier layer 41 is preferably less than 40 μm, preferably less than or equal to 34 μm, more preferably less than or equal to 30 μm. In the case of multiple barrier layers 41, the sum of the thicknesses of the barrier layers is less than 40 μm, preferably less than or equal to 34 μm, more preferably less than or equal to 30 μm.
In the case of a single barrier layer 41, made of EVOH and where the applicator is a nail varnish applicator, the thickness of the barrier layer 41 is preferably at least 20 μm. In the case of multiple barrier layers 41 made of EVOH and where the applicator is a nail varnish applicator, the sum of the thicknesses of the barrier layers 41 is preferably at least 20 μm.
In the case of a single barrier layer 41, made of EVOH and where the applicator is an applicator for mascara, liquid liner or lip gloss, the thickness of the barrier layer 41 is preferably at least 10 μm, more preferably at least 15 μm. In the case of multiple barrier layers made of EVOH and where the applicator is a mascara, liquid liner or lip gloss applicator, the sum of the thicknesses of the barrier layers 41 is preferably at least 10 μm, more preferably at least 15 μm.
The barrier layer(s) 41 can be positioned symmetrically within the multilayered material 4, i.e. with respect to a mid-plane of the multilayered material 4.
The multilayered material 4 can further comprise an outer layer of varnish 42, preferably a varnish composed of a mixture of epoxy and acrylic resin cross-linked by ultraviolet (UV) light or a thermal varnish such as a mixture comprising 2-butoxyethyl acetate, n-butyl acetate, polyacrylate and polymethylhydrosiloxane. The term “thermal varnish” is understood to mean a thermally cross-linked varnish. In this case, the mixture can comprise approximately 39% by weight 2-butoxyethyl acetate, approximately 19% by weight n-butyl acetate, approximately 30% by weight polyacrylate, approximately 10% by weight polymethylhydrosiloxane and water q.s. to 100%. This makes it possible to improve the translucency of the skirt 31, or even to make it translucent.
The multilayered material 4 can be printed by offset printing, screen printing or hot stamping. In this case, it is useful to leave a non-printed window through which the colour of the product can be seen. Where the multilayered material 4 comprises a layer of varnish, printing is done before applying this layer of varnish.
Furthermore, the multilayered material 4 can also comprise two supporting layers (an outer supporting layer 43 and an inner supporting layer 44 respectively). The outer 43 and inner 44 supporting layers can be made of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or low-density polyethylene (LDPE) or metallocene polyethylene or combined layers. The combined layers are layers produced by mixing and can be composed of a mixture of linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) and HDPE, preferably in ratios ranging from 30/70 to 70/30 (PEBDL/HDPE) and in particular 30/70, 50/50 and 70/30. The combined layers can also be composed of a mixture of LDPE and HDPE, preferably in ratios ranging from 30/70 to 70/30 (LDPE/HDPE) and in particular 30/70, 50/50 and 70/30. The combined layers can also be composed of a mixture of LLDPE and metallocene polyethylene, preferably in ratios ranging from 30/70 to 70/30 (LLDPE/metallocene polyethylene) and in particular 30/70, 50/50 and 70/30. The combined layers can also be composed of a mixture of HDPE and metallocene polyethylene, preferably in ratios ranging from 30/70 to 70/30 (HDPE/metallocene polyethylene) and in particular 30/70, 50/50 and 70/30. The outer 43 and inner 44 supporting layers can be made of homo-polypropylene (homo-PP), co-polypropylene (co-PP), polypropylene random (PPR), metallocene polypropylene or combined layers. The combined layers are layers produced by mixing and can be composed of a mixture of homo-PP and co-PP, or a mixture of homo-PP and PPR, or a mixture of co-PP and PPR, preferably a mixture of metallocene polypropylene and polypropylene selected from homo-PP, co-PP or PPR, preferably in ratios ranging from 30/70 to 70/30 and in particular 30/70, 50/50 and 70/30.
The supporting layers are preferably made of HDPE.
The thickness of the supporting layers can be at most 400 μm, preferably less than 300 μm, more preferably less than 200 μm. It is of interest to reduce the thickness of the supporting layers. This makes it possible to improve the translucency of the skirt 31, or even to make it translucent. Where the supporting layers comprise metallocene polyethylene or metallocene polypropylene alone or in combined layers, reducing the thickness of the skirt 31 makes it possible to improve its transparency or even to make it transparent. Reducing the thickness of the skirt 31 also allows the flexibility of the skirt 31 to be improved, and its weight reduced. The thickness of the supporting layers can be at least 100 μm, preferably greater than 150 μm, more preferably greater than 170 μm. The supporting layer contributes to preserving the product and to the protection offered by the barrier layer(s).
In these cases, the barrier layer 41 is contained between the two supporting layers 43, 44. The three layers 41, 43 and 44 are coextruded using a binder (or glue), for example a binder based on anhydride-modified polyolefin. The binder has no influence on the weight loss of the cosmetic product. Coextrusion makes it possible to produce the skirt without a longitudinal seam, which could represent a potential risk of the product leaking.
The container 3 also comprises an applicator cap 2 having a base 21, a rod 22 and an applicator tip 23. The base 21 is designed to be fixed to the tube head 32 and to close the opening 3221. The base 21 and the neck 322 are preferably provided with helical threads capable of cooperating with one another in a screwing relationship so as to close the opening 3221. The threads maintain the sealing of the closure of the opening 3221.
The rod 22 extends from the base 21 so that it can be housed inside the flexible tube 3 when the base 21 is fixed to the tube head 32 and closes the opening 3221. The rod 22 and the applicator tip 23 are designed to be able to pass through the opening 3221 of the neck 322. The rod 22 can be made in a single piece with the base 21 or fixed thereto.
The base 21 and the rod 22 ensure that the tube head 32 is sealed against fluids. Sealing can be effected by compression, exerted by a collar of the base 21, of a knurled portion housed in the base 21 over the top of the tube head 32. The knurled portion is compressed against the rod 22. Sealing can also be effected by fitting a small skirt on the base 21 into the opening 3221 of the neck 322. The applicator tip 23 to which the cosmetic product is temporarily transferred before application to part of the user's body can be a straight brush fixed to the rod 21, which is advantageous for nail varnishes and liquid liners. The straight brush can be a tuft of fibres fixed to the rod by anchoring into metal. In particular, use is made of nylon fibres with a diameter of between 25 and 300 μm, preferably between 50 and 100 μm. The tip of the applicator 23 can also be a round brush for mascara or a pad for lip gloss.
In the case of mascara, the container can further comprise a built-in wiper 33, the built-in wiper 33 and the flexible tube 3 being made of the same, single piece of material.
Measurement
A test for measuring the percentage of weight loss in four weeks of a cosmetic product, in this case nail varnish, through a multilayered material forming a flexible tube, is described below.
At least two identical flexible tubes are filled with nail varnish and hermetically sealed with a cap against water and air. The flexible tubes have an inner contact surface with the nail varnish of approximately 30 cm2. The composition of the nail varnish comprises ethyl and/or butyl acetate at approximately 70% by weight.
The weight of the two filled flexible tubes and an empty flexible tube (control) which is identical to the other two flexible tubes is measured. The three tubes being sealed when measured.
The three flexible tubes are placed in a heat chamber heated to 40° C.
After four weeks, the weight of the three flexible tubes is measured again.
The percentage loss of mass is calculated according to formula 1. The percentage weight loss represents the loss of weight of nail varnish.
An example of multilayered material suitable for manufacturing the skirt of the flexible tube is described below.
This multilayered material is a coextruded material comprising, from the outside inwards, the following successive layers:
This multilayered material makes it possible to obtain a container with an applicator for which the percentage weight loss at four weeks for a nail varnish is 0.87%.
Example 2 of multilayered material is similar to example 1, except that the thickness of the EVOH layer is different. Said EVOH layer is 33 μm thick.
This multilayered material makes it possible to obtain a container with an applicator cap for which the percentage weight loss at four weeks for a nail varnish is 0.7%.
Example 3 of multilayered material is similar to example 1. However, the layers of HDPE are replaced with layers of LLDPE/HDPE which are 170 μm thick and the layer of EVOH has a thickness of 26 μm.
This multilayered material makes it possible to obtain a container with an applicator cap for which the percentage weight loss at four weeks for a nail varnish is 0.63%.
Example 4 of multilayered material is similar to example 1. However, the layers of HDPE are replaced with layers of co-PP which are 170 μm thick and the layer of EVOH has a thickness of 25 μm.
This multilayered material makes it possible to obtain a container with an applicator cap for which the percentage weight loss at four weeks for a nail varnish is 0.55%.
Example 5 of multilayered material is similar to example 1. However, the layers of HDPE are replaced with layers of LLDPE/metallocene PE which are 170 μm thick and the layer of EVOH has a thickness of 25 μm.
This multilayered material makes it possible to obtain a container with an applicator cap for which the percentage weight loss at four weeks for a nail varnish is 0.67%.
Three comparative examples have been produced and are similar to the multilayered material in example 1. The differences are summarised in the table below:
A fourth comparative example is produced.
The multilayered material of the fourth example comprises, from the inside outwards:
The measured weight loss at four weeks of the nail varnish for this example is 3.3%.
The weight loss at 4 weeks of the empty tube is, in each of the above examples, 0.02%.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12 52352 | Mar 2012 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/054796 | 3/8/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/135593 | 9/19/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4659408 | Redding | Apr 1987 | A |
4919984 | Maruhashi et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5012944 | Scheurenbrand | May 1991 | A |
5061534 | Blemberg | Oct 1991 | A |
5230934 | Sakano et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5238148 | Holoubek | Aug 1993 | A |
5743279 | Gueret | Apr 1998 | A |
5862818 | Marinelli | Jan 1999 | A |
6029676 | Dumler | Feb 2000 | A |
6042906 | Itoh | Mar 2000 | A |
6158912 | Miraglia et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6210060 | Gueret | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218024 | Tamber | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6313221 | Yabuta | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6447860 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6572296 | Schrepf | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6632493 | Hildebrand et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6670007 | Safian et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6755585 | Gueret | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7223035 | Engel | May 2007 | B1 |
7252878 | Watanabe | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7810510 | Tranchant | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7845871 | Thiebaut | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8967897 | Apodaca | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20020057939 | Gueret | May 2002 | A1 |
20030172950 | Bouix et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050011892 | Nakajima et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060045605 | Deans et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046006 | Bastion et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060094810 | Kim | May 2006 | A1 |
20060272670 | Gueret | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070087145 | Hanita | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20090269121 | Snedden et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100129577 | Sasai et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100176136 | Lacoste et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100226705 | Crutchley | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20130260069 | Wang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130315646 | Stredak et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2202042 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2879418 | Jun 2006 | FR |
2006069581 | Mar 2006 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Examination Report with translation of the Written Opinion dated Sep. 16, 2014 (PCT/EP2013/054796); ISA/EP. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 10, 2013 (PCT/EP2013/054796); ISA/EP. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150020841 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |