Large amounts of network data are generated and consumed in the course of modern electronic communication. Such data are often transmitted to and/or received from entities outside of the influence or control of customers, both at an enterprise level and at a granular and/or personal level. Such entities may require formatting, censorship, compliance or other requirements for incoming and outgoing data. However, the number of manifestations and combinations of such data requirements is nearly infinite, and it can be difficult to configure systems to modify, format, or otherwise alter data to meet such widely disparate sets of requirements. Additionally, such requirements may change on short notice, and necessary reconfiguration to meet the changed requirements can be burdensome.
Various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure will be described with reference to the drawings, in which:
In the following description, various embodiments will be described. For purposes of explanation, specific configurations and details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will also be apparent to one skilled in the art that the embodiments may be practiced without the specific details. Furthermore, well-known features may be omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the embodiment being described.
Techniques described and suggested herein include systems and methods for implementing a customer-configurable packet mangler or other data alteration service in and/or using a distributed computing system. In particular, a customer may specify certain rules by which various types of data, inbound and/or outbound from customer devices, may be modified, upon which various components of the distributed computing system are utilized to implement the rules, e.g., using packet mangling techniques. For example, the customer may specify that outbound data to specific external device types or locales must conform to a customer-provided specification (e.g., for regulatory compliance and/or performance optimization), upon which the distributed computing system determines the necessary alterations and data patterns (or other markers) to which they apply. Thereafter, in the example given, the implementation may include redirection of some or all of the network traffic between the customer and the external device in question to a component of the distributed computing system. Upon processing in the determined manner, the redirected data is thereupon relayed to the original destination. As will be contemplated, a similar process may be utilized for inbound network traffic.
In another example, the data alteration service may be effective to modify data transiting between two virtualized instances of the distributed computing system, one of which is controlled by a customer requesting the service, while the other is controlled by a different customer. A separate virtualized instance of the distributed computing system may be invoked to implement the customer-requested rules, or in some embodiments, the same instance from whence (or to which) the data desired to be modified may perform the actual modification, e.g., in a quarantine or “sandbox.” It is contemplated that data transiting to or from any device or component controlled by a service-requesting customer, whether physical, virtual, aggregated or otherwise, to a device not under control by the customer (without regard to its nature), may be subject to packet mangling by the service. The service may, in some embodiments, be granularly controllable based on a number of criteria, including customer or external device type, geographic location, and the like.
An example implementation of such a data alteration service may include the generation of one or more policies that apply to some or all components involved in a given data transaction type. The policies, in some embodiments, are generated by the distributed computing system upon receipt of customer-defined rules, and may take into account data type, connected device type, customer characteristics, network topology, or any other characteristics relevant to the generation of an effective policy. Such policies, when broadcasted to the relevant devices, can ensure that all controlled devices (or a desired subset thereof) act to implement the associated customer-defined rules in a unified, predictable fashion. In embodiments where a customer controls a significant plurality of devices at varying levels of abstraction and/or access, such policies may also ensure that, e.g., mission-critical or strict rules take effect across all affected devices.
In some embodiments, the distributed computing system 106 consists of a plurality of networked computing resources 116, such as storage devices, servers, processors, network equipment, and the like. The networked computing resources are abstracted and/or grouped into virtualized or grouped resources 118 that consist of any portion or number of underlying networked computing resources, which in some embodiments includes physical hardware. For example, the virtualized or grouped resources may include guest operating systems that run in virtual machines enabled by a hypervisor with direct access to the hardware (e.g., a bare metal hypervisor). As another example, such virtualized or grouped resources may include relational databases, data storage and archival services and/or devices, distributed computing services and/or devices, or any level of abstraction thereof (e.g., physical machines, virtual machines, instances, and the like). Such virtualized resources may, in some embodiments, be exposed to a plurality of connecting customers, such as the customer or customer device described above. In some embodiments, the underlying networked computing resources from which the virtualized resources are derived are obfuscated to connecting customers. In some embodiments, the distributed computing system is capable of supporting a plurality of customers simultaneously connecting to the virtualized resources.
In some embodiments, such a distributed computing system may support the provision, using a virtualized resource, of a data modification service upon request of a customer. Such a request may be propagated by a customer, a customer device, or any constituent thereof by programmatic, graphical, automatic and/or manual invocation. For example, a customer may request the service via an application programming interface (API) or user interface (UI) provided by a provider of the distributed computing system and/or service provider. In some embodiments, rules may be provided by the customer as part of the service request, and/or separately from such a request, and in certain embodiments may be provided by the customer via a similar interface (e.g., an API or UI). The rules may be defined in any manner that the service and/or system is configured to receive. For example, rules may be formed using relational database queries such as structured query language (SQL) queries, artificial intelligence language and/or predicate logic notation, natural language, specialized languages developed specifically for the service, and the like. In some embodiments, the rules specify, to varying levels of granularity, desired alterations to transiting data, and may also specify the characteristics of devices or network traffic to which such alterations should apply.
In some embodiments, as previously mentioned, the rules are implemented by the service to apply to traffic transiting across a boundary of customer control or influence, e.g., between devices authorized by or for access by a customer and external devices without such authorization. In the illustrated example, a customer is authorized to access the constituents of customer device 102 (and vice versa), while devices 110 across the public network and external to that of a customer or customer device lie beyond a boundary that lies in between. It is contemplated that, in some embodiments, such authorized devices may connect with customer assets across a public network (and thus not necessarily co-located with other customer devices), but still be included as an authorized device due to implemented trust mechanisms, e.g., by encrypting the public network connection using a virtual private network or similar securing mechanism. It will be appreciated that, as previously mentioned, such devices may include virtual resources such as those of distributed computing system 106.
In some embodiments, the service uses the virtualized instance to determine, by at least processing the received rules, a policy that is thereupon propagated to some or all authorized and/or customer devices. Such a policy may, for example, be provided to various devices as part of regularly scheduled maintenance, via a policy push by a system management system, upon association and/or connection with a different customer device (e.g., upon establishing a VPN connection), and/or manually. The policy, in some embodiments, includes instructions that, when implemented, causes the affected device to retrieve and/or redirect all or some data or network traffic that would otherwise be directed via a direct network connection (e.g., the public network connection 112) to the virtualized resource of the distributed computing system that provides the service. In some embodiments, multiple policies may be generated and propagated, for example, to address different alteration schemes, device types, and/or scenarios. In alternate embodiments, a single policy addresses all specified rules. The policy may, in some embodiments, be determined from the rules by considering the characteristics of the devices involved, the nature of the data, the volume and/or resources of the distributed computing system that are required to implement the rules, and other factors.
Upon implementation of the policy across some or all devices, it will be appreciated that a portion of data transiting across the aforementioned boundary will instead be routed through the distributed computing system implementing the service, in particular the virtualized instance. Such redirected data is processed, in some embodiments, by the virtualized instance according to the received rules. The virtualized resource may configure the data in one of a large plurality of ways, including packet mangling techniques to achieve the effects specified by the rules. As the rules are customer-specified, the data may be configured for a large number of applications. Some examples include rules that enable anonymous browsing or access to external devices (e.g., by stripping cookies, user agents or other personally identifiable information within the data stream), transparent language translation, restriction or redirection of traffic according to defined quotas, code sanitization (e.g., processing transiting code to comply with industry standards), watermarking of images, data compression (either lossless or lossy), UTF-8 inbound canonicalization, differentiation of transmitted and/or received data based on geographic location(s) of one or more of the customer devices or external devices, caching and/or de-duplication (e.g., to improve performance and/or throughput), government or regulatory compliance (e.g., PCI DSS, destination-dependent government data import/export requirements, obscenity and/or morality filters, insertion of third party certifications and the like), content filtering (e.g., with respect to a set of published signatures), distributed denial of service (DDoS) mitigation (e.g., rules may be written, generated and/or implemented in accordance with a given volume of traffic), security filtering and pattern-based vulnerability mitigation (e.g., protection from SQL injection), selective filtering of network traffic (e.g., filtering traffic in one direction of a given data stream based at least in part on content previously received in the opposing direction, such as an automated cross-site scripting (XSS) mitigation scheme that detects and filters hypertext markup language (HTML) code in outbound traffic that matches content in an associated inbound request) and many other transformative cases. In some embodiments, the rules may be operable to cause certain actions to occur within the customer environment, e.g., upon at least a subset of customer devices. Such actions may include tripping of warnings or alarms, propagation of notifications, augmentation of data streams within the customer environment, quarantining or termination of unresponsive or otherwise malfunctioning customer devices, modification of the rules themselves, and many other types of actions. As will be appreciated, rules, and thus the associated data modification, may include both the restriction and augmentation of flowing data, depending on the nature of the rules. In embodiments where multiple rules are specified, duplicate and/or overlapping rules may be combined in order to save resources, improve latency and decrease processing time and/or cost.
In some embodiments, the rules may be operable to cause a distributed computing system or customer environment to recognize that multiple subsets of resources thereof are capable of processing data according to the rules. In some of such embodiments, a first subset of resources applies a first transformation to data according to the implemented rules. Additionally, a second (or greater) subset of resources applies a second (or greater) transformation to the data in accordance with the rules. The data may flow to the disparate subsets of resources in parallel, in sequence, or in some combination thereof. In some embodiments, the second (or greater) transformation may include injecting an additional executable instruction into the data stream, or possibly installing another (or the same) rule to be implemented by the second (or greater) subset of resources. In some embodiments, the second (or greater) subset of resources caches a portion of the data transiting it in accordance with the implemented rule, and the first subset of resources is configured to deduplicate the cached data, such as by replacing data in the data stream with the corresponding data cached by the second resources. In some embodiments, the first subset of resources replaces at least some of the transferred and/or cached data, such as data cached by the second or greater subset of resources, with cache identifiers, placeholders, or pointers indicating that such data has been cached. In some embodiments, the second or greater subset of resources inverts the transformation effected by the first subset of resources, e.g., by re-inserting at least some of the data replaced by cache identifiers and the like. In such embodiments, the inversion of the transformation may be triggered by, or at least influenced by, characteristics of the received data in the data stream and/or in the cache. Such techniques, as may be utilized in a wide area network (WAN) optimization scheme or other bandwidth optimization and/or caching scheme, may be transparently or specifically implemented in order to decrease network traffic, decrease latency, and improve performance of applications requiring data to transit high-cost and/or capacity limited uplinks, including, for example, cellular or wireless data networks. Such techniques may also decrease traffic, latency, etc. from poorly implemented software or hardware solutions that fail to cache data independently.
Costs incurred to process the rules (e.g., by resource usage, per implemented rule, and/or by data volume and/or network traffic processed), including generation and propagation of the associated policy, may be tracked in a manner that allows the requesting customer to be billed for such usage. In such embodiments, accounting records may be updated, and in some embodiments, when an existing allocation or virtual resource under control of the customer is used to implement the service, such records and tracked usage may be used to adjust the amount charged to the customer for the virtual resource or allocation already in their possession. Other metrics may be tracked, such as those associated with traffic matching an implemented or unimplemented rule or set of rules. Such metrics may be exposed to the customer, a managed data transformation provider, and/or the distributed computing resource provider (e.g., to be used internally to improve efficiency of operations thereof).
Data transiting across customer boundary 208 may, in whole or part as defined by customer rules or policies (e.g., the customer rules and policies described in connection with
Although the virtualized resource performing the data processing is illustrated as straddling the customer boundary, such location is meant to be merely illustrative. Such a resource may, by virtue of being virtualized, be associated with physical resources located anywhere along, e.g., a network topology, and not necessarily on an external edge of such a topology. Additionally, the illustrated customer boundary is conceptual in nature, and does not necessarily require an implemented barrier, such as a firewall. For example, virtualized resources outside the control of the customer requesting the services (e.g., virtualized resource 214) may, in some embodiments, be under control of a different customer of the distributed computing system. A policy, such as the policy described in connection with
An illustrated example UI 300 is shown. The UI may be used for initial requisitioning, configuration after initial requisitioning, or both. The rule selection portion 302 allows a customer to select among predetermined rule sets 304 or define a customer rule set 306. The predetermined rule sets may be preconfigured for ease of selecting common data transformation regimes and applications, including those examples provided above in connection with
In the example given, a device type restriction portion 308 is also shown. From this portion of the UI, the customer may select among predetermined device types 310 to which one or more selected rule sets 312 may apply. Such device types may be separate using any appropriate criteria. For example, one device type may include mobile devices, while another may include virtualized instances. Each selected device type may be subject to any number of rule sets selected in the rule selection portion described above. Additionally, the customer may define a custom device type 314 in a fashion similar to that of a custom rule set, also as described above. Such additional device types may be displayed in a dropdown, e.g., of all other device types known to the system, or defined manually. Upon completing selection, the customer's selections are passed to the implementing entity, e.g., the virtualized resource, for implementation, reconfiguration, and/or further processing.
In some embodiments, such as those shown and described in connection with
The illustrative environment includes at least one application server 608 and a data store 610. It should be understood that there can be several application servers, layers, or other elements, processes, or components, which may be chained or otherwise configured, which can interact to perform tasks such as obtaining data from an appropriate data store. As used herein the term “data store” refers to any device or combination of devices capable of storing, accessing, and retrieving data, which may include any combination and number of data servers, databases, data storage devices, and data storage media, in any standard, distributed, or clustered environment. The application server can include any appropriate hardware and software for integrating with the data store as needed to execute aspects of one or more applications for the client device, handling a majority of the data access and business logic for an application. The application server provides access control services in cooperation with the data store, and is able to generate content such as text, graphics, audio, and/or video to be transferred to the user, which may be served to the user by the Web server in the form of HTML, XML, or another appropriate structured language in this example. The handling of all requests and responses, as well as the delivery of content between the client device 602 and the application server 608, can be handled by the Web server. It should be understood that the Web and application servers are not required and are merely example components, as structured code discussed herein can be executed on any appropriate device or host machine as discussed elsewhere herein.
The data store 610 can include several separate data tables, databases, or other data storage mechanisms and media for storing data relating to a particular aspect. For example, the data store illustrated includes mechanisms for storing production data 612 and user information 616, which can be used to serve content for the production side. The data store also is shown to include a mechanism for storing log data 614, which can be used for reporting, analysis, or other such purposes. It should be understood that there can be many other aspects that may need to be stored in the data store, such as for page image information and to access right information, which can be stored in any of the above listed mechanisms as appropriate or in additional mechanisms in the data store 610. The data store 610 is operable, through logic associated therewith, to receive instructions from the application server 608 and obtain, update, or otherwise process data in response thereto. In one example, a user might submit a search request for a certain type of item. In this case, the data store might access the user information to verify the identity of the user, and can access the catalog detail information to obtain information about items of that type. The information then can be returned to the user, such as in a results listing on a Web page that the user is able to view via a browser on the user device 602. Information for a particular item of interest can be viewed in a dedicated page or window of the browser.
Each server typically will include an operating system that provides executable program instructions for the general administration and operation of that server, and typically will include a computer-readable storage medium (e.g., a hard disk, random access memory, read only memory, etc.) storing instructions that, when executed by a processor of the server, allow the server to perform its intended functions. Suitable implementations for the operating system and general functionality of the servers are known or commercially available, and are readily implemented by persons having ordinary skill in the art, particularly in light of the disclosure herein.
The environment in one embodiment is a distributed computing environment utilizing several computer systems and components that are interconnected via communication links, using one or more computer networks or direct connections. However, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that such a system could operate equally well in a system having fewer or a greater number of components than are illustrated in
The various embodiments further can be implemented in a wide variety of operating environments, which in some cases can include one or more user computers, computing devices, or processing devices which can be used to operate any of a number of applications. User or client devices can include any of a number of general purpose personal computers, such as desktop or laptop computers running a standard operating system, as well as cellular, wireless, and handheld devices running mobile software and capable of supporting a number of networking and messaging protocols. Such a system also can include a number of workstations running any of a variety of commercially-available operating systems and other known applications for purposes such as development and database management. These devices also can include other electronic devices, such as dummy terminals, thin-clients, gaming systems, and other devices capable of communicating via a network.
Most embodiments utilize at least one network that would be familiar to those skilled in the art for supporting communications using any of a variety of commercially-available protocols, such as TCP/IP, OSI, FTP, UPnP, NFS, CIFS, and AppleTalk. The network can be, for example, a local area network, a wide-area network, a virtual private network, the Internet, an intranet, an extranet, a public switched telephone network, an infrared network, a wireless network, and any combination thereof.
In embodiments utilizing a Web server, the Web server can run any of a variety of server or mid-tier applications, including HTTP servers, FTP servers, CGI servers, data servers, Java servers, and business application servers. The server(s) also may be capable of executing programs or scripts in response requests from user devices, such as by executing one or more Web applications that may be implemented as one or more scripts or programs written in any programming language, such as Java®, C, C # or C++, or any scripting language, such as Perl, Python, or TCL, as well as combinations thereof. The server(s) may also include database servers, including without limitation those commercially available from Oracle®, Microsoft®, Sybase®, and IBM®.
The environment can include a variety of data stores and other memory and storage media as discussed above. These can reside in a variety of locations, such as on a storage medium local to (and/or resident in) one or more of the computers or remote from any or all of the computers across the network. In a particular set of embodiments, the information may reside in a storage-area network (“SAN”) familiar to those skilled in the art. Similarly, any necessary files for performing the functions attributed to the computers, servers, or other network devices may be stored locally and/or remotely, as appropriate. Where a system includes computerized devices, each such device can include hardware elements that may be electrically coupled via a bus, the elements including, for example, at least one central processing unit (CPU), at least one input device (e.g., a mouse, keyboard, controller, touch screen, or keypad), and at least one output device (e.g., a display device, printer, or speaker). Such a system may also include one or more storage devices, such as disk drives, optical storage devices, and solid-state storage devices such as random access memory (“RAM”) or read-only memory (“ROM”), as well as removable media devices, memory cards, flash cards, etc.
Such devices also can include a computer-readable storage media reader, a communications device (e.g., a modem, a network card (wireless or wired), an infrared communication device, etc.), and working memory as described above. The computer-readable storage media reader can be connected with, or configured to receive, a computer-readable storage medium, representing remote, local, fixed, and/or removable storage devices as well as storage media for temporarily and/or more permanently containing, storing, transmitting, and retrieving computer-readable information. The system and various devices also typically will include a number of software applications, modules, services, or other elements located within at least one working memory device, including an operating system and application programs, such as a client application or Web browser. It should be appreciated that alternate embodiments may have numerous variations from that described above. For example, customized hardware might also be used and/or particular elements might be implemented in hardware, software (including portable software, such as applets), or both. Further, connection to other computing devices such as network input/output devices may be employed.
Storage media and computer readable media for containing code, or portions of code, can include any appropriate media known or used in the art, including storage media and communication media, such as but not limited to volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage and/or transmission of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data, including RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the a system device. Based on the disclosure and teachings provided herein, a person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate other ways and/or methods to implement the various embodiments.
The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereunto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.
Other variations are within the spirit of the present disclosure. Thus, while the disclosed techniques are susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrated embodiments thereof are shown in the drawings and have been described above in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the specific form or forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the disclosed embodiments (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. The term “connected” is to be construed as partly or wholly contained within, attached to, or joined together, even if there is something intervening. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate embodiments of the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
Preferred embodiments of this disclosure are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/491,403, filed Jun. 7, 2012, entitled “FLEXIBLY CONFIGURABLE DATA MODIFICATION SERVICES,” now U.S. Pat. No. 10,084,818, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4782517 | Bernardis et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4868877 | Fischer | Sep 1989 | A |
4908759 | Alexander et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4918728 | Matyas et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5054067 | Moroney et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5146498 | Smith | Sep 1992 | A |
5201000 | Matyas et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5495533 | Linehan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5633931 | Wright | May 1997 | A |
5675653 | Nelson | Oct 1997 | A |
5826245 | Sandberg-Diment | Oct 1998 | A |
5862220 | Perlman | Jan 1999 | A |
5933503 | Schell et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6012144 | Pickett | Jan 2000 | A |
6175625 | Safford et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185679 | Coppersmith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195622 | Altschuler et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199162 | Luyster | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6240187 | Lewis | May 2001 | B1 |
6259789 | Paone | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6336186 | Dyksterhouse et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356941 | Cohen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6505299 | Zeng et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546492 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6816595 | Kudo | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6934249 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934702 | Faybishenko et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7149698 | Guheen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7194424 | Greer et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7295671 | Snell | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7362868 | Madoukh et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7490248 | Valfridsson et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7565419 | Kwiatkowski et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7620680 | Lamport | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7680905 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7707288 | Dawson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716240 | Lim | May 2010 | B2 |
7756808 | Weigt et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774826 | Romanek et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7865446 | Armingaud et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7877607 | Circenis et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882247 | Sturniolo et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894604 | Nishioka et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894626 | Wang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7937432 | Rowley | May 2011 | B2 |
7953978 | Greco et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7970625 | Reicher et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7991747 | Upadhyay et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7992055 | Agarwal et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8024562 | Gentry et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024582 | Kunitz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8051187 | Noy et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060596 | Wootton et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8065720 | Ebrahimi et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8091125 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8111828 | Raman et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131663 | Taylor | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8140679 | Hatanaka | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140847 | Wu | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8185931 | Reeves | May 2012 | B1 |
8213602 | Mamidwar | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8219869 | Ahn et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8224796 | Shinde et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8224979 | Herz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8230050 | Brandwine et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8244745 | Lim | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8245037 | Durgin et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8245039 | Jones | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8251283 | Norton | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8261320 | Serenyi et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8295492 | Suarez et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296434 | Miller et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8302170 | Kramer et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8312064 | Gauvin | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8315387 | Kanter et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8321560 | Pai et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8370648 | Natanzon | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8379857 | Zheng | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8387127 | Narver et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8443367 | Taylor et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8468455 | Jorgensen et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8494168 | Tolfmans | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8538020 | Miller | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8555383 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8565108 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8572369 | Schmidt-Karaca et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572758 | Clifford | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8588426 | Xin et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8601263 | Shankar et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8607358 | Shankar et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8654970 | Olson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8681773 | Chazel et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8713311 | Roskind | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8751807 | Ma et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752067 | Kishita | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8774403 | MacMillan et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8804950 | Panwar | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8850516 | Hrebicek et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8868914 | Teppler | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8904181 | Felsher et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8950005 | Torney | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8964990 | Baer et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8973008 | Czajkowski et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8989379 | Katar et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9031240 | Yang et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9053460 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9094291 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9130937 | Ostermann | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9268947 | Jarlstrom et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9288184 | Kvamme et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9367697 | Roth et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9705674 | Roth et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
20010011226 | Greer et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010052071 | Kudo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020029337 | Sudia et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020076044 | Pires | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078361 | Giroux et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020135611 | Deosaran et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141590 | Montgomery | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030021417 | Vasic et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037237 | Abgrall et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030079120 | Hearn et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081790 | Kallahalla et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084290 | Murty et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093694 | Medvinsky et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030131238 | Vincent | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163701 | Ochi et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172269 | Newcombe | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188181 | Kunitz et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030188188 | Padmanabhan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195957 | Banginwar | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040009815 | Zotto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040093499 | Arditi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107345 | Brandt et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143733 | Ophir et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193915 | Smith et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215987 | Farkas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040223608 | Oommen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004978 | Reed et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010760 | Goh et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021712 | Chassapis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050317 | Kramer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050120232 | Hori et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050123142 | Freeman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149677 | Shimada et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165859 | Geyer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050195743 | Rochberger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246778 | Usov et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273629 | Abrams et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010323 | Martin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018468 | Toba et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021018 | Hinton et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031301 | Herz et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031586 | Sethi | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060089163 | Khawand | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060123010 | Landry et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143685 | Vasishth et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155829 | Annic | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168248 | Sack | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060190724 | Adams | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195575 | Delany et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204003 | Takata et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206932 | Chong | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060288232 | Ho et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291664 | Suarez et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033637 | Yami et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050641 | Flynn et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055862 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055921 | Challenor | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070136599 | Suga | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140480 | Yao | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143851 | Nicodemus et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150480 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070157288 | Lim | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179987 | Lim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070180153 | Cornwell et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198656 | Mazzaferri et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070220279 | Northcutt et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230704 | Youn et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070230706 | Youn | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239987 | Hoole et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266037 | Terry et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283446 | Yami et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005024 | Kirkwood | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019516 | Fransdonk | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019527 | Youn et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022376 | Ke et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025514 | Coombs | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034200 | Polcha et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046984 | Bohmer et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082827 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084996 | Chen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086717 | Brunn | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112561 | Kim | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127279 | Futa et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080172562 | Cachin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080247540 | Ahn et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294711 | Barber | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298590 | Katar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319909 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090025087 | Peirson, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034733 | Raman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060197 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092252 | Noll et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106552 | Mohamed | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090158033 | Jeong et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158430 | Borders | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165076 | DeCusatis et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165114 | Baum et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090196418 | Tkacik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090232300 | Zucker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241114 | Kirihata | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090244600 | Haycock | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090245519 | Cachin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274300 | Tou et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276364 | Iaia et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276514 | Subramanian | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300356 | Crandell | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008499 | Lee et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011448 | Wagner | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100014662 | Jutila | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017626 | Sato et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036779 | Sadeh-Koniecpol et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100074445 | Nefedov et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088126 | Iaia et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095118 | Meka | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115614 | Barile et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138218 | Geiger | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100146269 | Baskaran | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153670 | Dodgson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161830 | Noy et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162347 | Barile | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165876 | Shukla et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174919 | Ito et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185863 | Rabin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211781 | Auradkar et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211782 | Auradkar et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235635 | Kshirsagar et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241848 | Stuber et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242088 | Thomas | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250965 | Olson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254537 | Buer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100266132 | Bablani et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268788 | Arimilli et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269171 | Raz et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100289627 | McAllister et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299313 | Orsini et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303241 | Breyel | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100306850 | Barile et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100316219 | Boubion et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318782 | Auradkar et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325732 | Mittal et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332401 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110022642 | deMilo et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110072264 | McNulty | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083163 | Auvenshine et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083190 | Brown et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099362 | Haga et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110113466 | Stringham et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113467 | Agarwal et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116636 | Steed | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145571 | Schmidt-Karaca et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154031 | Banerjee et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154057 | England et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173435 | Liu et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178933 | Bailey | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191462 | Smith | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209064 | Jorgensen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213971 | Gurel et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225423 | Lynch | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225431 | Stufflebeam, Jr. et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244440 | Saxon et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246765 | Schibuk | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252071 | Cidon | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258437 | McKelvey et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258443 | Barry | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270872 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289134 | de los Reyes et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289314 | Whitcomb | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296497 | Becker | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320819 | Weber et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120036370 | Lim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120042162 | Anglin et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120079289 | Weng et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120096272 | Jasper et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120114118 | Verma | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124612 | Adimatyam et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134495 | Liu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140923 | Lee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120144233 | Griffith et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151551 | Readshaw et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159148 | Behren et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159518 | Boliek et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170753 | Pandrangi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173881 | Trotter et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185913 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191979 | Feldbau | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120198042 | Dunbar et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204032 | Wilkins et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216041 | Naono et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120240183 | Sinha | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254090 | Burris et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120260094 | Asim et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266218 | Mattsson | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281839 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290850 | Brandt et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120291101 | Ahlstrom et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297183 | Mukkara et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297200 | Thom et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300936 | Green | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303961 | Kean et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311675 | Ham et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314854 | Waters | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120321086 | D'Zouza et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323717 | Kirsch | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323990 | Hayworth | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331293 | Ma et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130013931 | O'Hare et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031255 | Maloy et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031356 | Prince et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044878 | Rich et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047034 | Salomon | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130085936 | Law | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086661 | Roth et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091350 | Gluck | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097320 | Ritter et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103834 | Dzerve et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130111217 | Kopasz et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130157619 | Di Luoffo et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159732 | Leoutsarakos | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163753 | MacMillan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166703 | Hammer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130167196 | Spencer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130198521 | Wu | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212576 | Huang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130269035 | Bajaj et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283045 | Li et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290716 | Gavrilov | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130305311 | Puttaswamy Naga | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312094 | Zecheru | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130316682 | Vieira | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326233 | Tolfmans | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140012751 | Kuhn et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140020072 | Thomas | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140047549 | Bostley, III et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140115327 | Gorbach et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122866 | Haeger et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140164774 | Nord et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177829 | MacMillan et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140201533 | Kruglick | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215554 | Roberts | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150222604 | Ylonen | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150295941 | Lim et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304399 | Kramer | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160224651 | Kumarasamy et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170142092 | Lim | May 2017 | A1 |
20180045189 | Lee et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1740944 | Mar 2006 | CN |
101281578 | Oct 2008 | CN |
101573910 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101741547 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101753302 | Jun 2010 | CN |
102130768 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102318263 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102656591 | Sep 2012 | CN |
SHO61177479 | Aug 1986 | JP |
H09233067 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2000215240 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000295209 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001209582 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002540748 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003188871 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003208355 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004126716 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005057417 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005197912 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005258801 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005533438 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006099548 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006279848 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007081482 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007507760 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007293468 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008015669 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008541273 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2008306418 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009064178 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2009213064 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2009246800 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2010128824 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2011019129 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011159053 | Aug 2011 | JP |
2011175578 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2012073374 | Apr 2012 | JP |
2012178010 | Sep 2012 | JP |
2013513834 | Apr 2013 | JP |
2014501955 | Jan 2014 | JP |
101145766 | May 2012 | KR |
WO0154099 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO2004008676 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO2009060283 | May 2009 | WO |
WO2010001150 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010093559 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO2011083343 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO2011089712 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO2012060979 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2012109640 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO2013145517 | Mar 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Australian Examination Report No. 1 for Patent Application No. 2017204853 dated Jun. 29, 2018, 4 pages. |
Australian Examination Report No. 2, dated Mar. 5, 2019, for Patent Application No. 2017204853, 3 pages. |
Barker et al., “Recommendation for Random Number Generation Using Deterministic Random Bit Generators,” National Institute Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-90A, Jan. 2012, 136 pages. |
Bernstein et al., “The Poly1305-AES Message-Authentication Code,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science (M/C 249), The University of Illinois at Chicago, Feb. 21, 2005, 18 pages. |
Bethencourt et al., “Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption,” IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2007, 15 pages. |
Canadian Notice of Allowance for Patent Application No. 2,899,014 dated Feb. 8, 2018, 1 page. |
Canadian Notice of Allowance for Patent Application No. 2,916,954 dated Dec. 19, 2017, 1 page. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,898,995 dated Jul. 3, 2018, 9 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,899,008 dated Mar. 1, 2019, 4 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,899,008 dated Mar. 14, 2018, 4 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,899,019 dated Jul. 3, 2018, 8 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,899,019 dated Mar. 25, 2019, 8 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,899,027 dated Jul. 17, 2018, 6 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,916,954 dated Feb. 11, 2019, 4 pages. |
Chinese Decision on Grant for Patent Application No. 201480046236.7 dated Jan. 4, 2019, 4 pages. |
Chinese Decision on Rejection for Patent Application No. 201480011965.9 dated Jan. 15, 2018, 6 pages. |
Chinese Decision on Rejection for Patent Application No. 201480013039.5 dated Apr. 12, 2019, 15 pages. |
Chinese First Office Action for Patent Application No. 201480020482.5, dated Dec. 28, 2017, 11 pages. |
Chinese First Office Action for Patent Application No. 201480046236.7, dated Feb. 24, 2018, 11 pages. |
Chinese Notice on Grant of Patent for Application No. 201480020500.X dated Dec. 28, 2017, 4 pages. |
Chinese Notice on the Second Office Action for Patent Application No. 201480020517.5 dated Jan. 3, 2018, 8 pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action for Patent Application No. 201480020482.5 dated Jul. 19, 2018, 28 pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action, dated Sep. 25, 2018, for Patent Application No. 201480013039.5, 11 pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2019 for Patent Application No. 201480020482.5, 19 pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action for Patent Application No. 201480020517.5 dated Jul. 25, 2018, 6 pages. |
Chowdhury et al., “Network Virtualization: State of the Art and Research Challenges”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Jul. 2009, 7 pages. |
Chowdhury et al., “Virtual Network Embedding With Coordinated Node and Link Mapping”, IEEE INFOCOM 2009, Apr. 2009, 9 pages. |
European Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Application No. 14751237.0 dated May 28, 2018, 4 pages. |
European Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Application No. 14751612.4 dated Jan. 3, 2018, 4 pages. |
European Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Application No. 14819866.6 dated Feb. 8, 2019, 4 pages. |
European Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Patent Application No. 14751881.5 dated Oct. 25, 2018, 5 pages. |
European Communication Under Rule 71(3) EPC for Application No. 14752191.8, Intention to Grant, dated Mar. 22, 2019, 75 pages. |
European Official Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Patent Application No. 14751256.0 dated Jan. 3, 2018, 5 pages. |
European Official Letter for Patent Application No. 14751881.5 dated Feb. 21, 2018, 3 pages. |
Guttman et al., “An Introduction to Computer Security: The NIST Handbook,” Special Publication 800-12, Oct. 1, 1995, Sections 17.6 and 18.3.2 and Section 19 for cryptographic tools, XP055298016, retrieved on Aug. 26, 2016, from http://www.davidsalomon.name/CompSec/auxiliary/handbook.pdf. |
IEEE, “Draft Standard for Identity-based Public-key Cryptography Using Pairings,” IEEE P1363.3/D1, Apr. 2008, retrieved Sep. 22, 2015, from http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363/IBC/material/P1363.3-D1-200805.pdf, 85 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 29, 2014, in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/015404, filed Feb. 7, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 28, 2014, in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/15697, filed Feb. 11, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 30, 2014, in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/015408, filed Feb. 7, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 30, 2014, in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/015410, filed Feb. 7, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 30, 2014, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/015414, filed Feb. 7, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 28, 2014, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/044861, filed Jun. 30, 2014. |
Itani et al., “Privacy as a Service: Privacy-Aware Data Storage and Processing in Cloud Computing Architectures,” 2009 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, pp. 711-716. |
Japanese Appeal Decision for Patent Application No. 2016-511994 dated Mar. 12, 2019, 3 pages. |
Japanese Final Decision of Rejection for Patent Application No. 2015-558056 dated Mar. 13, 2018, 18 pages. |
Japanese Final Decision on Rejection for Patent Application No. 2015-558070 dated Apr. 3, 2018, 7 pages. |
Japanese Notice and Report for Revocation of Reconsideration Report for Patent Application No. 2015-558043 dated Mar. 9, 2018, 6 pages. |
Japanese Notice and Report for Revocation of Reconsideration Report for Patent Application No. 2016-524288 dated Apr. 13, 2018, 6 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance for Patent Application No. 2015-558042, dated Dec. 27, 2017, 6 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 2, 2018, for Patent Application No. 2015-558056, 6 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Final Rejection for Patent Application No. 2017-232031 dated Mar. 26, 2019, 13 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection for Patent Application No. 2017-217362 dated Feb. 12, 2019, 9 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection, dated Oct. 9, 2018, for Patent Application No. 2016-524288, 21 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection, dated Sep. 4, 2018, for Patent Application No. 2015-558043, 25 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Revocation for Reconsideration and Report, dated Dec. 4, 2018, for Patent Application No. 2015-558070, 4 pages. |
Japanese Report on Notice of Allowance for Patent Application No. 2015-558044 dated Mar. 27, 2018, 6 pages. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Amendment, dated Apr. 4, 2019, for Patent Application No. 10-2017-7022249, 8 pages. |
Krawczyk et al., “HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function (HKDF),” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), May 2010, retrieved Sep. 22, 2015, from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5869, 14 pages. |
Manulis, et al., “Group Signatures: Authentication with Privacy,” retrieved from https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/BSI/Publications/Studies/GruPA/GruPA.pdf?_blob=publicationFile, Published May 15, 2010, 267 pages. |
Nikkei Trendy, “Simple Input of URL Using Hosts File,” Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Feb. 6, 2006, retrieved Dec. 21, 2016, from http://trendy.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/tec/winxp/20060131/115213/?45=nocnt, 5 pages. |
NIST, “Implementation Guidance for FIPS PUB 140-1 and the Cryptographic Module Validation Program,” Jan. 10, 2002, 63 pages. |
NIST, “Implementation Guidance for Fips Pub 140-2 and the Cryptographic Module Validation Program,” Initial Release Mar. 28, 2003, 205 pages. |
Olexiy et al., “Starting Share Files with NFS,” Linux Journal, dated Jan. 1, 2002, retrieved on Jan. 2, 2018, from http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4880?page=0,0, 13 pages. |
Rahumed et al., “A Secure Cloud Backup System with Assured Deletion and Version Control,” 2011 International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops, IEEE Computer Society, 8 pages. |
Rescorla, “Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method,” Network Working Group, RTFM Inc., Jun. 1999, retrieved on Sep. 22, 2015, from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2631, 13 pages. |
Sieloff, “The new systems administrator: The role of becoming root,” Inside Solaris, Oct. 2002, 8(10):6-9. |
Singapore Notice of Eligibility for Grant, dated Feb. 5, 2018, for Patent Application No. 11201510650U, 3 pages. |
Stack Exchange, “Storing secrets in software,” by ninefingers, Stack Exchange Security Blog, dated Sep. 6, 2011, retrieved on Jan. 2, 2018, from http://security.blogoverflow.com/2011/09/storing-secrets-in-software/, 3 pages. |
Wikipedia, “IEEE P1363” an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) standardization project for public-key cryptography, retrieved Sep. 22, 2015, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_P1363, 3 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Key derivation function,” retrieved Sep. 22, 2015, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_derivation_function, 4 pages. |
Zhu et al., “Algorithms for assigning substrate network resources to virtual network components”, IEEE INFOCOM 2006, Apr. 2006, 12 pages. |
Australian Notice of Acceptance for Patent Application No. 2017204853 dated May 16, 2019, 3 pages. |
Canadian Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 25, 2019, for Patent Application No. 2,898,995, 1 page. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,899,027 dated May 13, 2019, 6 pages. |
Chinese Fourth Office Action for Patent Application No. 201480011965.9 dated May 20, 2019, 5 pages. |
Chinese Notice on Grant for Patent Application No. 201480011965.9 dated Aug. 22, 2019, 4 pages. |
European Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Application No. 14751881.5 dated Jul. 2, 2019, 4 pages. |
India First Examination Report for Patent Application No. 201617000381 dated Sep. 10, 2019, 7 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance for Patent Application No. 2017-217362 dated Sep. 17, 2019, 6 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance for Patent Application No. 2018-133603 dated May 21, 2019, 6 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Final Rejection for Patent Application No. 2015-558070 dated Sep. 3, 2019, 8 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection, dated Jun. 4, 2019, for Patent Application No. 2016-524288, 9 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection, dated May 14, 2019, for Patent Application No. 2018-000819, 12 pages. |
Korean Decision of Grant for Patent Application No. 10-2017-7022249 dated Sep. 6, 2019, 3 pages. |
European Communication Rule 69 for Patent Application No. 19187650.7 dated Nov. 7, 2019, 7 pages. |
Japanese Appeal Decision for Patent Application No. 2016-524288 dated Nov. 5, 2019, 3 pages. |
Chinese Notice to Grant for Patent Application No. 201480020482.5 dated Oct. 10, 2019, 4 pages. |
European 94(3) Communication for Patent Application No. 14819866.6 dated Nov. 18, 2019, 5 pages. |
India First Examination Report for Patent Application No. 7420/DELNP/2015 dated Oct. 21, 2019, 6 pages. |
India First Examination Report for Patent Application No. 7421/DELNP/2015 dated Dec. 27, 2019, 7 pages. |
India First Examination Report for Patent Application No. 7426/DELNP/2015 dated Dec. 26, 2019, 8 pages. |
India First Examination Report for Patent Application No. 7474/DELNP/2015 dated Dec. 26, 2019, 7 pages. |
Brazil Preliminary Office Action for Patent Application No. BR1120150193781 dated Mar. 3, 2020, 7 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,899,019 dated Feb. 17, 2020, 5 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2899008 dated Feb. 19, 2020, 2 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2916954 dated Feb. 19, 2020, 5 pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action for Patent Application No. 201480013039.5 dated Dec. 13, 2019, 7 pages. |
European Rule 71(3) Communication Patent Application No. 14751881.5 dated Feb. 21, 2020, 109 pages. |
India First Examination Report for Patent Application No. 7428/DELNP/2015 dated Jan. 29, 2020, 8 pages. |
Japanese Appeal Decision for Patent Application No. 2015-558070 dated Feb. 18, 2020, 3 pages. |
Japanese Decision on Final Rejection for Patent Application No. 2017-232031 dated Mar. 3, 2020, 4 pages. |
Japanese Final Decision on Rejection for Patent Application No. 2018-000819 dated Feb. 4, 2020, 6 pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,898,995 dated Jul. 31, 2020, 3 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance for Patent Application No. 2018-000819 dated Aug. 18, 2020, 6 pages. |
European Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for Application No. 14819866.6 dated Aug. 20, 2020, 8 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Final Rejection for Patent Application No. 2020-097937 dated Aug. 18, 2020, 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190036973 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13491403 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 16140393 | US |