The present invention relates generally to the field of flexographic printing and, more particularly, to portable flexographic ink proofing apparatus for providing proofs of ink samples.
In the field of flexographic printing ink samples may be obtained by drawing ink over a substrate using a hand ink proofer or by more sophisticated proofing methods. In hand proofing ink is applied to the substrate by manually rolling the hand proofer across the substrate. Manual ink proofer tools are utilized for proofing ink colors in an effort to accurately predict the results to be obtained by running a selected ink specimen in a printing press. A computer microscope or other instrument is then used to examine the ink smear on the substrate. The computer then indicates to the technician various color components to be added to the ink in order to achieve the desired ink coloration.
In a flexographic printing operation, resilient plates are utilized for delivering the ink to the substrate. Substrates generally include the stock or paper to be printed but may also include plastic and many other materials.
The shade of a color on a flexographic printing press is dependent on the thickness of the ink film applied to the substrate or stock. The ink film thickness is determined by the speed of the press, the pressure applied between the printing plate and paper (i.e., impression), and the pressure between the rollers on the printing unit.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,814,001 describes an ink proofer designed to overcome the problems associated with conventional manual proofer tools by generating consistent and reliable ink draws using a hand-held proofer tool retained in a movable mounting assembly. A variable pressure system is coupled to the mounting assembly to move the proofer tool into a contact position with a cylindrical drum. The transfer roller of the proofer tool then transfers ink to a substrate inserted between the drum and the transfer roller of the proofer tool when a drive motor for the drum is engaged. U.S. Pat. No. 6,814,001 is hereby incorporated by reference.
Printing presses generally use an anilox roll to meter ink and a cylinder bearing an engraved plate to transfer the ink from the anilox roll and to deposit it onto the substrate as a printed image. The substrate commonly includes paper but may also include many other materials such as plastic bags or any other material onto which printing may be applied.
The engraved plate may be made to include both solid and/or dot patterns depending upon image requirements. For a single color image, typically a plate with a solid or smooth surface may be used. For a multi-color image where more than one color is required a dot pattern is generally used. The superimposition of multiple dot patterns onto a substrate is used to print multi-color images. Typically each dot pattern is printed with a primary color onto the substrate. By putting the substrates through multiple passes in the press, any shade or color may be created by the combination of primary colors.
To obtain the desired colors in multi-color materials however, each primary color must print correctly and be of the correct density. Therefore, when adjusting inks for color, it is the primary color in each dot pattern that must be controlled.
Current proofing processes only use an anilox in a transfer roll to lay down ink. This process creates a smear of ink that proofs its color and density. The transfer roll duplicates the volume of the ink in the anilox and color, but does not duplicate the dot percentage pattern found in an offset plate. The dot percentage pattern is based on the proportion of the substrate that is covered with ink. Small dots result in a smaller percentage of coverage than large dots.
Printing plates can be and often are tested on the printing press but the expense of doing so is high. Modern printing presses are expensive. Any time that is used to test on the press is non productive time and cannot be used for profitable production. A printing press requires considerable time for setup and cleanup in addition to the time that is used in a test run. In addition, modern printing presses operate at high speed and can consume large quantities of ink and substrate quickly adding to the expense of testing.
Thus, there is still room for improvement in the preparation of proofing printouts in order to provide the best results in a printing press. While current proofing techniques are helpful in preparing for production printing press runs they are not adequate to predict the performance of the printing press.
A standard flexographic printing press has four main components:
A conventional hand proofer has three components:
The present invention solves many of the above-discussed problems. In one aspect, the invention is a proofing tool including an anilox roll, and a transfer roll.
The invention includes a transfer or transfer roll that includes a printing plate similar to that used on a flexographic printing press. The printing plate may include for example a photopolymer printing plate.
The transfer roll and the anilox roll are shiftable relative to each other between an engaged position where the transfer roll is engaged with the anilox roll and a disengaged position where the transfer roll is disengaged from the anilox roll. An anilox support member supports the anilox roll and a transfer support member supports the transfer roll such that the anilox roll and the transfer roll are oriented substantially parallel and separated by a nip distance. The invention may also include a positive rotational linkage between the anilox roll and the transfer roll so that the pitch velocity of the anilox roll and the pitch velocity of the transfer roll are substantially matched.
The invention includes a proofing tool, having an anilox roll and a transfer roll. The transfer roll and the anilox roll are shiftable relative to each other between an engaged position where the transfer roll is engaged with the anilox roll and a disengaged position wherein the transfer roll is disengaged from the anilox roll. The invention further includes an anilox support member supporting the anilox roll and a transfer support member supporting the transfer roll such that the anilox roll and the transfer roll are oriented substantially parallel to one another and separated by a nip distance. The invention may also further include a positive stop nip adjustment mechanism operably connected to the anilox roll and the transfer roll which is adjustable so that when the anilox roll and the transfer roll are in the engaged position the positive stop prevents the nip distance from being smaller than a set value.
The invention may also further include a positive stop nip adjustment mechanism operably connected to the proofing tool and a proofing machine such that nip between the transfer roll and the drive roller of the proofing machine which is adjustable so that when the transfer roll and the drive roller of the proofing machine are in the engaged position the positive stop prevents the nip distance from being smaller than a set value.
In another aspect, the invention includes a gear driven anilox proofing tool with a positive stop adjustment of nip distance the anilox roll and the transfer roll or the transfer roll and the drive roller of the proofing machine. The present invention includes a proofing tool that has a positive rotating connection between the anilox roller and the transfer or transfer roller so that no matter how light the nip pressure is the speed of the rollers remains matched. The positive rotating connection matches the pitch velocity of the anilox roll with the transfer roll whether the anilox roll and the transfer roll are of similar or varying diameters.
In addition, the present invention allows the nip of the proofing tool to closely simulate the nip of the printing press so that the shear properties of the ink are not affected significantly differently in the proofing tool than in the printing press, which would lead to variations in color, density and shade between the proof and the printed result. A gear drive between the anilox roll and the transfer roll prevents slipping between the anilox roll and the transfer roll. The gear drive also allows wider variation in pressure ratios without slipping.
The proofing tool of the present invention is also adapted for use with a proofing machine that has a drive roll. A typical proofing machine has a drive roll that is formed of rubber. Often, a drive roll is formed of 60 durometer rubber. The drive roll may have a polished metallic surface, a textured surface or a surface of another material. In an embodiment of the invention, the drive roll has a polished metallic surface in a center segment and resilient bands at the edges. For example the resilient bands may be formed or rubber or urethane. Materials of forty to sixty durometer may be suitable. The present invention creates positive or semi-positive drive between the drive roll of the proofing machine and the transfer roll of the hand proofer. For the purposes of this application, a positive drive will be considered a drive that has essentially no slippage between the transfer roller and the drive roller in the case of an automated proofing arrangement and the transfer roller and the surface that supports the substrate in the case of a hand proofing arrangement. In other words a positive drive in accordance with the present invention maintains the pitch velocities of the anilox roll and the transfer roll to be substantially equal. An exemplary positive drive includes a gear tooth engagement between the transfer roll and the drive roller or supporting surface. A semi-positive drive will be considered a drive that has limited slippage between the transfer roller and the drive roller in the case of an automated proofing arrangement and the transfer roller and the surface that supports the substrate in the case of a hand proofing arrangement. An exemplary semi-positive drive includes a high friction engagement between the transfer roll and the drive roller or supporting surface. For example, a gear rolling on a resilient rubber surface creates a semi-positive drive. A positive or semi-positive drive allows lighter nip pressure on the substrate even with high contact pressure between the anilox roll and the transfer roll.
This is particularly helpful for film drawdowns. In addition, the positive or semi-positive drive between the drive roll and the transfer roll allows for higher doctor blade pressures. The positive or semi-positive drive between the drive roll and the transfer roll may be accomplished by the gears on either side of the transfer roll engaging with the drive roll instead of the drive roll engaging the paper which then in engages the transfer roll by friction.
Another aspect of the present invention is that the nip is adjustable by positive displacement rather then by the application of variable spring pressure. In the present invention the nip is set by displacement adjustable by one or more micrometer thimbles built into the proofing tool. This allows for consistent, repeatable displacement between the anilox roll and the transfer roll and better approximates the nip of the printing press, thus allowing more reliable consistent proofing of the resulting material.
The hand proofer of the present invention may be operated manually or may be used with a proofing machine.
In another aspect, the present invention lends itself to particularly easy cleaning for removing inks to allow for multiple proofing of multiple color inks without significant delay.
Another benefit of the present invention is that it may be adapted to use readily available anilox rolls from multiple suppliers currently in the market.
Another aspect of the present invention is that when it is used for proofing, the anilox and transfer rolls are oriented in a vertical position relative to one another. This vertical orientation of the anilox roll above the transfer roll simulates the orientation found in a printing press so that the effect of gravity on ink in the cell structure of the anilox roll is similar to that found in the printing press. This provides for more reliable consistent proofing that is more comparable to the results that will be seen in the printing press when the actual print run is made.
The proofing tool of the present invention generally includes an anilox support, a transfer support, an anilox roll, a transfer roll and a positive roll drive. The anilox support and the transfer support are substantially parallel in substantially similar yoke shaped structures adapted to support the anilox roll and the transfer roll respectively. The anilox support and the transfer support are connected to one another at an end distal from the anilox roll and the transfer roll. The anilox support and the transfer support can flex relative to one another in a limited, controlled fashion.
The anilox roll and the transfer roll are supported in close proximity to one another on independent axles so that they can roll relative to one another. In one aspect of the invention, the anilox roll and the transfer roll are interconnected by an anilox gear and transfer gear. The anilox gear and the transfer gear mesh to provide a positive rotation of the anilox roll related to the transfer roll so that slippage cannot occur and pitch velocity is maintained equal between the two.
The anilox support and the transfer support are separated by a short gap and one or two micrometer thimbles are interposed so that the micrometer thimbles can be adjusted to accurately alter the spacing between the transfer support and the anilox support. The micrometer thimbles create a positive stop so that the distance between the anilox roll and the transfer roll, when they are engaged, can be precisely and repeatably set. The positive stop sets a minimum distance that can be achieved between the anilox roll and the transfer roll. Thus, the spacing between the anilox support and the transfer support may be repeatedly and precisely set.
In another aspect to the invention there may be a transfer gear located at each end of the transfer roll. Thus, when the proofing tool is used with a mechanical proofer the transfer gears on each side of the transfer roll engage with the drive roll to create a positive or semi-positive drive between the drive roll and the transfer roll.
The anilox roll and the transfer roll of the present invention are oriented so that, in use, they are in vertical position with the anilox roll above the transfer roll. This duplicates the arrangement in a printing press such that the effect of gravity on ink transfer between the anilox roll and the transfer roll is similar to that in a printing press producing more reliable and consistent proofs.
The present invention and engraved printing plate may be applied to the transfer or transfer roller of the proofer. The engraved plate may be made to include both solid and/or dot patterns depending upon ink and image requirements. For spot colors, those colors used for a single color image, typically a plate with a solid or smooth surface may be used. For process colors, colors that are used in a multiple color image, where more than one color is required, a dot pattern is generally used. The superimposition of multiple dot patterns onto a substrate in a printing press is used to print multi-color images.
The printing plate used in the present invention may include a photopolymer printing plate. In one embodiment of the invention, the photopolymer printing plate used on the proofing tool may be made simultaneously with or even as a portion of the same plate as a photopolymer printing plate that is used on the printing press for a particular printing job. The portion of the printing plate for use on the proofer can then be utilized to predict the performance of the printing plate on the printing press at much lower cost than that which would be required to test a printing plate on the printing press. In this way, performance of the plate on the press is highly predictable. It is possible to closely match both color density and dot gain, thereby predicting the performance of the plate on the printing press without the necessity or expense of doing a printing press run. When color density and dot gain are closely matched, for example within five percent, the appearance of the printed result is indistinguishable to all but the most careful and experienced observer.
In another embodiment, the present invention includes a method of predicting the performance of a printing plate on a printing press including preparing a printing plate for the printing press simultaneously or in parallel with a printing plate for a proofing device. The proofing plate is mounted on the proofing device. Optimization of performance of the printing plate on the proofing device is achieved by adjusting to achieve minimum ink transfer from the anilox roller to the printing plate and minimum ink transfer from the printing plate to the substrate. A printing proof is prepared and the proof is evaluated for characteristics including dot gain and color density. This information is used to adjust the parameters of the printing plate, if required. An adjusted printing plate is prepared and the process repeated. This allows the printing technician to set up the printing press to optimize the performance of the printing press plate on the printing press while also minimizing printing press downtime and maximizing printing press run time.
In another aspect of the invention, the photopolymer plate on the proofing tool is utilized to predict the performance of the ink, the combination of ink, photopolymer and sticky back adhesive that is used to secure the printing plate to the transfer roll.
Printing plates can be and commonly are tested on the printing press, but the expense of doing so is very high. A modern printing press can cost upward $300,000.00, and uses large quantities of substrate and ink in a relatively short time. In addition, the time required to clean and adjust the printing press can be substantial. Thus, printers would prefer to have the printing press operating doing production work as much of the time as possible. Any press time that is used in testing plates, ink or combinations of plates, ink and the sticky back adhesive that is used to secure the plates is time that is unavailable for press production activities.
If after proofing a plate on the proofing device it is necessary to make adjustments in the plate, adjustments in the plate can be made and the new adjusted plate proofed on the proofing device without the expense of set-up and clean-up and other necessary expenses involved in proofing the plate on the printing press.
Referring to
Anilox support 102 generally includes yoke 112 and extended portion 114. Yoke 112 supports anilox roll 106 between two arms 116. Likewise, transfer support 104 includes yoke 122 and extended portion 124. Anilox roll 106 and transfer roll 108 are supported between the arms of yoke 112 and yoke 122 respectively. Anilox support 102 and transfer support 104 are connected only at distal end 125 of extended portions 120 and 124. Otherwise, anilox support 102 and transfer support 104 are oriented substantially parallel with a small gap between them. Transfer support 104 is capable of some flexing movement from a disengaged position to an engaged position such that transfer roll 108 is held slightly more separated from anilox roll 106 when no force is applied to transfer roll 108 than when transfer roll is in contact with a printing substrate.
Positive roll drive 110 generally includes anilox gear 126 and transfer gear 128. As best seen in
Proofing tool 100 also includes one or more micrometer thimbles 130. Two micrometer thimbles 130 may be used to allow independent adjustment to ensure equal nip spacing across the width of anilox roll 106 and transfer roll 108. Micrometer thimbles 130 are positioned so that the measuring surfaces of spindles (not shown) contact transfer support 104 to determine a minimum nip spacing between anilox roll 106 and transfer roll 108. Gear teeth 131 of transfer gear 128 extend beyond transfer roll 108, in part, so that if the proofing tool 100 is set down on a flat surface there will be a standoff created and transfer roll 108 will not touch the surface.
Anilox gear 126 and transfer gear 128 may be formed with fine pitch gear teeth to prevent gear chatter. In one aspect of the invention, the gear teeth mesh such that the gears are separated by slightly more than a true pitch diameter to allow for adjustment of nip without the need to change gears.
Optionally, proofing tool 100 may include a separation device (not shown) which can be utilized to force anilox support 102 apart from transfer support 104 a slight distance to ensure separation between anilox roll 106 and transfer roll 108 when not in use.
Proofing tool 100 may be formed substantially from aluminum alloy or from other materials known to the art.
Referring to
In one embodiment of the invention, doctor blade 138 meets anilox roller 106 at approximately a 30 degree pressure angle. If the diameter of the anilox roll 106 is changed it may be necessary to change doctor blade holder 136 or to relocate the pivotable mounting of doctor blade holder 136. Alternately, the position of anilox roll 106 may be changed, for example by the use of a bushing having an eccentrically located hole therein.
Still referring particularly to
The orientation of the doctor blade 138 in the present invention is reversed from that in known conventional prior art proofing tools. Orientation reversal allows the optional introduction of a felt dam 147 adjacent to the doctor blade 138. The application of a felt dam 147 allows for the maintenance of a larger volume of ink in the well adjacent the doctor blade 138 which is useful, particularly, in long draw downs.
Referring to
Anilox roll 106 and transfer roll 108 may be supported in anilox support 102 by precision ball bearings, sleeve bearings or bushings. Anilox roll 106 or transfer roll 108 may be supported at a one end by fixed bearing 148 and at a second end by moveable bearing 150. One or both of anilox roll 106 or transfer roll 108 may be supported at both ends by fixed bearing 148 or by moveable bearing 150. Fixed bearing 148 and moveable bearing 150 may be, for example, Delrin bearings. Moveable bearing 150 may be adjustable so as to be loosened to remove transfer roll 108 and tightened to secure transfer roll 108 in place for use.
In another embodiment of the invention, the drive roll of a proofing machine (not shown) may include a drive roll gear 152 such that transfer gear 128 engages the drive roll gear 152 so that the drive roll gear drives transfer gear 128 which in turn drives anilox gear 126 providing a positive drive engagement between a drive roll (not shown), transfer roll 108 and anilox roll 106.
In another embodiment of the invention, proofing tool 100 may incorporate an auxiliary ink reservoir (not shown). Auxiliary ink reservoir may include a drip line and a valve to allow the institution of a steady drip supply to replenish a well of ink at doctor blade 138.
Referring to
In an embodiment of the invention like that depicted in
Printing plate 160 may include, for example, a plate made from a photopolymer via a photopolymer printing process. Photopolymers are used in a plate making process in which a sheet of photopolymer plastic is exposed, generally with a positive image transparency via an enlargement or contact printing process. The photopolymer is then “developed” with chemicals that etch the surface of the photopolymer to make it take ink in varying degrees. The resulting printing plate 160 is then fixed with other chemicals and dried to prepare if for use in the printing process. The photopolymer plate is then used in the printing process to provide images that allow for tonal gradations when printed. Photopolymer plates can also be prepared using a laser process.
Another aspect of the present invention is that positive roll drive 110 may be used to maintain rotational integrity during proofing as in other embodiments described herein. The meshing anilox gear 126 and transfer gear 128 match the pitch velocity of anilox roll 106 with cylinder 158 bearing printing plate 160 which is also may be matched with the pitch velocity of a drum (not shown) that transports the substrate.
Cylinder 158 bearing the engraved printing plate 160 will typically be of larger diameter than transfer roll 108 described in some embodiments. For example, cylinder 158 may have a diameter of approximately 2 inches. In order to accommodate the larger diameter of cylinder 158 bearing engraved printing plate 160, spacer 162 may be used as depicted in
The larger diameter of the cylinder 158 bearing the engraved printing plate 160 provides more surface area for producing larger useable images.
Printing plate 160 may have similar engraved characteristics as an engraved offset plate that will be run on a printing press. Alternately, a standard printing plate 160 may be used that includes, for example, dot patterns ranging from five to one hundred percent density as well as solid patterns. An example printing plate 160 pattern is depicted in
In another aspect of the invention, depicted in
An example embodiment of a drive roll 168 according to one example embodiment is shown in
A semi-positive drive is formed by the contact of the resilient band segments 171 of the drive roll 168 with the teeth of the impression roll 108 or the cylinder 158 having the plate 160 secured thereto, such as is shown in
The present invention also includes a method of predicting the performance of a printing press for a printing job. The method includes preparing a first printing plate 160 then securing the printing plate 160 to a proofing tool 100. The proofing tool 100 is then adjusted to optimize ink transfer from anilox roll 106 to printing plate 160 and further adjusted to optimize ink transfer from printing plate 160 to a substrate. Optimization of ink transfer generally is achieved by adjusting the nip until minimum ink transfer without skipping of the image occurs across the width of the printed image. Once ink transfer is optimized an operator prepares a printing proof on a substrate and then evaluates the printing proof to predict the performance of a second printing plate 160 which is adapted for use on the printing press. This evaluation allows prediction of the performance of the second printing plate 160 on the printing press.
When the operator is evaluating printing performance the operator may measure dot gain and/or color density as well as other factors related to the printing proof. Instruments for making these measurements are known. In some embodiments of the invention, the first printing plate 160 and second printing plate 160 are prepared as a single printing plate having a first portion and a second portion that are then separated to create the first printing plate 160 and the second printing plate 160. Optionally the printing plates may be prepared separately but simultaneously or prepared to similar or identical standards to allow prediction of the performance of the printing plate 160 on the printing press.
The proofs prepared with the first printing plate 160 on proofing tool 100 may also be evaluated for the performance of sticky back adhesive which is applied between the printing plate 160 and cylinder 158 of proofing tool 100. A skilled operator can observe the results on the proof and determine whether the sticky back adhesive is too thick, too thin, too hard or too soft, too stiff or too flexible.
Referring to
Based on the evaluation of the sample proof prepared with printing plate 160 it may be desired to adjust the characteristics of printing plate 160. An additional adjusted printing plate 160 may be prepared in which the adjusted printing plate 160 is adjusted relative to the first printing plate to alter dot density or print density or other characteristics. For example, the adjusted printing plate 160 may be adjusted to compensate for an undesirable dot gain by increasing or decreasing the dot density on the plate.
The present invention also includes a method of supplying a kit for predicting the performance of a printing press for a printing job. The method includes supplying or providing a proofing device including a proofing tool 100 to which a first printing plate 160 is securable and providing instructions to perform the method as outlined above.
Referring to
In another embodiment of the invention the method is used to test the ink and compatibility of the ink with a particular photo polymer printing plate 160 and substrate.
In another embodiment of the invention the invention may be utilized to validate the ink photopolymer and sticky back combination for use on the printing plate to run a printing job which has previously been run. The present invention may also include a printing plate 160 for printing that includes a printing press portion 170 that is dimensioned to be secure to a printing press as well as a proofing portion 172 that is dimensioned to be secure to a proofing tool 100. The printing press portion 170 and the proofing portion 172 are separable so that the printing press portion 170 can be secured to the printing press and the proofing portion 172 can be secured to the proofing tool 100.
In another embodiment the invention includes a proofing tool 100 including an anilox roll 106 and cylinder 158 as well as a proofing printing plate 160 that is secured to cylinder 158 and which includes a portion of a printing plate 160 that includes a printing press portion 170 and a proofing portion 172 wherein the printing press portion 170 will be used to print materials that have been proofed with the proofing printing plate.
Anilox support 202 generally includes yoke 212 and extended portion 214. Yoke 212 supports anilox roll 206 between two arms 216. Likewise, transfer support 204 includes yoke 222 and extended portion 224. Anilox roll 206 and transfer roll 208 are supported between the arms of yoke 212 and yoke 222 respectively. In this example embodiment, anilox support 202 and transfer support 204 are connected only at distal end 225 of extended portions 220 and 224. Otherwise, anilox support 202 and transfer support 204 are oriented substantially parallel with spacer 162 and a small gap between them. In other embodiments, anilox support 202 and transfer support 204 are connected at a location closer to anilox roll 206 and transfer roll 208. Transfer support 204 is capable of some flexing movement from a disengaged position to an engaged position such that transfer roll 208 is held, for example slightly more separated from anilox roll 206 when no force is applied to transfer roll 208 than when transfer roll is in contact with a printing substrate. Transfer support 204 can also hold transfer roll 208 in contact with anilox roll 206.
Positive roll drive 210 generally includes anilox gear 226 and transfer gear 228. Anilox gear 226 and transfer gear 228 mesh together to synchronize the motion of anilox roll 206 and transfer roll 208. In an example embodiment of the invention, there is a single set of anilox gear 226 and transfer gear 228. Another example embodiment of the invention includes one anilox gear 226 and two transfer gears 228. If one anilox gear 226 and two transfer gears 228 are present, one anilox gear 226 is located on one end of anilox roll 206 and two transfer gears 228 are located on each end of transfer roll 208 respectively. In another example embodiment, proofing tool 200 may utilize a semi positive drive in which anilox gear 226 engages a resilient surface of transfer roll 208 in a substantially non slip relationship.
Metering roll 201 is positioned adjacent anilox roll 206 and can be forced against anilox roll 206 under spring tension for example by threaded arrangement 203. Threaded arrangement 203 may be tightened or loosened as desired to control the force with which metering roll 201 contacts anilox roll 206 to adjust metering pressure. Metering roll 201 can rotate against and in contact with anilox roll 206, which forces ink into anilox roll 206 cells. A generally wedge shaped space between the metering roll 201 and anilox roll 206 forms a reservoir with adequate volume to contain sufficient ink for proofing an ink sample. Metering roll 201, in an example embodiment, has a resilient surface such as rubber or another polymer. Metering roll 201 is located above anilox roll 206 in contrast to the prior art.
Proofing tool 200 also includes doctor blade 205. In an example embodiment, doctor blade 205 is designed to have a leading edge that shears the excess ink from the anilox roll 206. That is, doctor blade 205 is a leading edge doctor blade.
Proofing tool 200 also includes one or more micrometer thimbles 230. Two micrometer thimbles 230 may be used to allow independent adjustment to achieve equal nip spacing across the width of anilox roll 206 and transfer roll 208. In an example embodiment, micrometer thimbles 230 are positioned so that the measuring surfaces of spindles (not shown) contact transfer support 204 to determine a minimum nip spacing between anilox roll 206 and transfer roll 208. In an example embodiment, gear teeth 131 of transfer gear 228, as previously described, extend beyond transfer roll 208, in part, so that if the proofing tool 200 is set down on a flat surface there will be a standoff created and transfer roll 208 will not touch the surface.
Anilox gear 226 and transfer gear 228 may be formed with fine pitch gear teeth to prevent gear chatter. In one aspect of the invention, gear teeth 131 mesh such that Anilox gear 226 and transfer gear 228 are separated by slightly more than a true pitch diameter to allow for adjustment of nip without the need to change gears.
Optionally, proofing tool 200 may include a separation device (not shown) which can be utilized to force anilox support 202 apart from transfer support 204 a slight distance to ensure separation between anilox roll 206 and transfer roll 208 when not in use.
Proofing tool 200 may be formed substantially from aluminum alloy or from other materials known to the art.
In operation, referring to
If a proof is to be hand pulled, an operator grasps proofing tool 100 by extended portion 114 and extended portion 120 and orients proofing tool 100 so that anilox roll 106 is substantially vertically above transfer roll 108. Transfer roll 108 is then brought into contact with a substrate and proofing tool 100 is drawn along the substrate. Ink is then transferred from anilox roll 106 to transfer roll 108 with the amount of ink being transferred being controlled by doctor blade 138 and the qualities of anilox roll 106. Ink from transfer roll 108 is transferred to the substrate creating an ink proof.
If proofing tool 100 is used with an ink proofing machine (not shown) proofing tool 100 is prepared for proofing in a process similar to that described above. Proofing tool 100 is then attached to proofing machine (not shown) by connecting ball sockets 144 to ball ends 142.
A substrate is inserted between transfer roll 108 or proofing tool 100 and a drive roll (not shown) of ink proofing machine (not shown).
If positive roll drive 110 is present, in one embodiment, transfer gear 128 may be engaged to a drive roll gear 152 so that as drive roll 168 rotates the drive roll gear 152 it meshes with transfer gear 128 and rotates transfer roll 106. Transfer gear 128 engages with anilox gear 126 and rotates anilox roll 106, thus preventing slippage between the drive roll (not shown), transfer roll 108, and anilox roll 106.
When proofing tool 100 is released from contact with the substrate, anilox roll 106 and transfer roll 108 may be separated by the resiliency of extended portion 120 and extended portion 124.
In operation, referring to
If a proof is to be hand pulled, an operator grasps proofing tool 200 by extended portion 214 and extended portion 220 and orients proofing tool 200 so that anilox roll 206 is substantially vertically above transfer roll 208 and metering roll 201 is above anilox roll 206. Transfer roll 208 is then brought into contact with a substrate and proofing tool 200 is drawn along the substrate. Ink is pressed into cells of anilox roll 206 by metering roll 201. Ink is then transferred from anilox roll 206 to transfer roll 208 with the amount of ink being transferred being controlled by doctor blade 205 which shears off excess ink from anilox roll 206 and the qualities of anilox roll 206. Ink from transfer roll 208 is transferred from photopolymer plate 210 to the substrate creating an ink proof.
This operation is substantially different than that of a press. In proofing tool 200, metering roll 201 is gravitationally above anilox roll 206 and ink is held in the nip between metering roll 201 and anilox roll 206 by the inherent viscosity and surface tension of the ink. In a press, the metering roll is gravitationally below the anilox roll, where the metering roll rotates in an ink bath and lifts ink upward to the anilox roll. It follows then, that doctor blade 205 in proofing tool 200 is functionally different as well. In proofing tool 200, leading edge doctor blade 205 shears excess ink away from anilox roll 206 at a location above the center of rotation of anilox roll 206.
Trailing edge doctor blades 154 act to both force ink into the anilox roll cells, and to remove excess ink. Because of its trailing edge positioning and dual role, over time, ink particulates can build up on the back of trailing edge doctor blade 154. This results in a less efficient metering of ink and less accurate prediction of ink and plate performance on the press. It has been observed that when a sufficient quantity of ink particulate accumulate behind trailing edge doctor blade 154 the force with which trailing edge doctor blade 154 is against anilox roll 206 is overcome and an undesired excess quantity of ink is released. The excess quantity of ink is transferred to transfer roll 108 or photopolymer plate 210 and an area of increased color density is created on the substrate.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of any of the essential attributes thereof; therefore, the illustrated embodiments should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, reference being made to the appended claims rather than to the foregoing description to indicate the scope of the invention.
This application is a Continuation in Part of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/104,110 entitled “Offset Hand Proofer Tool” filed Apr. 16, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/925,974 entitled “Offset Hand Proofer Tool” filed Apr. 24, 2007 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/964,870 entitled “Offset Hand Proofer Tool” filed Aug. 15, 2007. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/084,131 entitled “Improvements to Flexographic Proofing Tools and Methods” filed Jul. 28, 2008. All aforementioned applications are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1442287 | Mattern | Jan 1923 | A |
1472307 | Moffett | Oct 1923 | A |
2118238 | Smith | May 1938 | A |
2526542 | Davies | Oct 1950 | A |
2563061 | Parker | Aug 1951 | A |
2611914 | Vanasse | Sep 1952 | A |
2663254 | Parrish | Dec 1953 | A |
2773274 | Beech | Dec 1956 | A |
2985102 | Vandercook | May 1961 | A |
2990715 | Bradt | Jul 1961 | A |
2991713 | McFarland | Jul 1961 | A |
2998767 | Vandercook et al. | Sep 1961 | A |
3122840 | Karstens | Mar 1964 | A |
3131631 | Haskin, Jr. | May 1964 | A |
3167009 | Sloane | Jan 1965 | A |
3288060 | Miller | Nov 1966 | A |
3322065 | Procter et al. | May 1967 | A |
3331318 | Augustyn et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3372416 | Katzell | Mar 1968 | A |
3413918 | Gingras | Dec 1968 | A |
3734014 | Oda | May 1973 | A |
3793952 | Neumann et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3818529 | Leggett | Jun 1974 | A |
3819929 | Newman | Jun 1974 | A |
3896730 | Garrett et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
4003311 | Bardin | Jan 1977 | A |
4004509 | Moss | Jan 1977 | A |
4015340 | Treleven | Apr 1977 | A |
4015524 | Herbert | Apr 1977 | A |
4019434 | Hoexter | Apr 1977 | A |
4048490 | Troue | Sep 1977 | A |
4072103 | Fletcher et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4098170 | Russell | Jul 1978 | A |
4102374 | Klein | Jul 1978 | A |
4125088 | Hong et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4215298 | Bigley et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4216676 | Bugnone | Aug 1980 | A |
4258125 | Edhlund | Mar 1981 | A |
4288125 | Ingle | Sep 1981 | A |
4338052 | Lockett | Jul 1982 | A |
4434562 | Bubley et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4445433 | Navi | May 1984 | A |
4458736 | Trevor | Jul 1984 | A |
4522057 | Kerchiss | Jun 1985 | A |
4538654 | Nickoloff | Sep 1985 | A |
4538946 | Bloch | Sep 1985 | A |
4547780 | Cummins | Oct 1985 | A |
4558643 | Arima et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4561478 | Fields | Dec 1985 | A |
4586978 | Kondo et al. | May 1986 | A |
4630952 | Elbaum | Dec 1986 | A |
4665627 | Wilde et al. | May 1987 | A |
4686902 | Allain et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4696331 | Irland | Sep 1987 | A |
4729698 | Haddon | Mar 1988 | A |
4735170 | Deal | Apr 1988 | A |
4736511 | Jenkner | Apr 1988 | A |
4745878 | Sagawa | May 1988 | A |
4770216 | Ruscak | Sep 1988 | A |
4774884 | Sugimoto et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4782753 | Bolza Schunemann | Nov 1988 | A |
4817526 | Winston | Apr 1989 | A |
4852486 | Ely et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4871002 | Turner | Oct 1989 | A |
4872407 | Banke | Oct 1989 | A |
4878427 | Washchynsky et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4886467 | Peveto | Dec 1989 | A |
4896595 | Beckett, Jr. | Jan 1990 | A |
4936212 | Moss | Jun 1990 | A |
4945958 | Shoda | Aug 1990 | A |
4984532 | Winters | Jan 1991 | A |
4989513 | Toda et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4991637 | Butler | Feb 1991 | A |
5010819 | Uribe et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5058287 | Harley | Oct 1991 | A |
5083511 | Hertel et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5099586 | Anderson | Mar 1992 | A |
5107910 | Sasaki | Apr 1992 | A |
5132911 | Leader, Jr. et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5140899 | Greer et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5159602 | Giordano et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5167754 | Lutzow et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5195680 | Holt | Mar 1993 | A |
5239901 | Lin | Aug 1993 | A |
5267818 | Marantette | Dec 1993 | A |
5289769 | Lewis | Mar 1994 | A |
5289772 | Kohara et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5294257 | Kelly et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303652 | Gasparrini et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5317971 | Deye, Jr. et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5322015 | Gasparrini | Jun 1994 | A |
5323703 | Blaser | Jun 1994 | A |
5325899 | Kochling | Jul 1994 | A |
5354377 | Jeffrey, Jr. | Oct 1994 | A |
5402724 | Yaeso et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5485782 | Van Der Horst | Jan 1996 | A |
5490460 | Soble et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5492160 | McCracken | Feb 1996 | A |
5495800 | Weissbein et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5509703 | Lau et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5560296 | Adams | Oct 1996 | A |
5573814 | Donovan | Nov 1996 | A |
5575211 | Harrison | Nov 1996 | A |
5615611 | Puschnerat | Apr 1997 | A |
5636571 | Abrahamson | Jun 1997 | A |
5666881 | Zanoli | Sep 1997 | A |
5736194 | Bedbury | Apr 1998 | A |
5754208 | Szlucha | May 1998 | A |
5772368 | Posh | Jun 1998 | A |
5772787 | Weishew | Jun 1998 | A |
5853036 | Welch | Dec 1998 | A |
5856064 | Chou | Jan 1999 | A |
5873686 | Elmore | Feb 1999 | A |
5948740 | Christianson | Sep 1999 | A |
5967041 | Schoenert et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6003409 | Lamsfuss et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006665 | Stuchlik et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012391 | Weishew | Jan 2000 | A |
6035547 | Hess et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058770 | Engel | May 2000 | A |
6191086 | Leon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6231953 | Mossbrook et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6280801 | Schmitt | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6354213 | Jenkins | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374878 | Mastley | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378426 | Furr et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6422143 | Lawrence et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6526884 | Bardet et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530323 | Bardet et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6539861 | Bardet et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6543359 | Bardet et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6615719 | Winston | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6659007 | Winston | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684784 | Kolbe et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6718873 | Sambri et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6789477 | Rogge et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6814001 | Westby et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6883427 | Price et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7194954 | Winston | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7275482 | Westby | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7281473 | Westby et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7316182 | Westby | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7536952 | Winston | May 2009 | B2 |
7574956 | Westby | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7575956 | ***Ararao et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7600471 | Westby | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20030051618 | Westby et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030089255 | Rogge et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040099162 | Huang | May 2004 | A1 |
20050223926 | Baeten | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050241504 | Westby | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050243154 | Westby et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060102029 | Westby | May 2006 | A1 |
20060260488 | Westby | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260490 | Westby | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260491 | Westby | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070006750 | Westby | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080264286 | Westby | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100005975 | ***Mitchell | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100005984 | Westby | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3938405 | Nov 1989 | DE |
0428767 | Nov 1989 | EP |
3008003 | Dec 1994 | JP |
2001-0083792 | Sep 2001 | KR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US02/25993 dated Dec. 23, 2002. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/051974 dated Mar. 5, 2010. |
American Ink Maker, “2001 Buyer's Buide Suppliers,” Dec. 2000, pp. 109 and 159. |
Little Joe Industries, “Little Joe,” Aug. 14, 2001, 2 pages. |
Little Joe Industries, “Little Joe Offset Proofing Press,” 1 page prior to Apr. 16, 2008. |
Paramarco Global Graphics, “Precision Proofer,” Aug. 7, 2001, 6 pages. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 10/219,018, filed Aug. 14, 2002, inventor Westby. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 10/976,194, filed Oct. 28, 2004, inventor Westby. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/125,816, filed May 10, 2005, inventor Westby. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/126,081, filed May 10, 2005, inventor Westby. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,997, filed Jun. 8, 2005, inventor Westby. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/564,114, filed Sep. 22, 2009, inventor Westby. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,619, filed May 10, 2006, inventor Westby. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,623, filed May 10, 2006, inventor Westby. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,381, filed May 9, 2006, inventor Westby. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,435, filed May 9, 2006, inventor Westby. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,110, filed Apr. 16, 2008, inventor Westby. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100005985 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60925974 | Apr 2007 | US | |
60964870 | Aug 2007 | US | |
61084131 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12104110 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 12510789 | US |