Embodiments of the present invention relate to the field of integrated circuits. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention pertain to electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection for integrated circuits.
An electrostatic discharge (ESD) event occurs when there is a transfer of energy between bodies that have different electrostatic potentials, either through contact or through an ionized ambient discharge. Integrated circuits (ICs) with inadequate ESD protection are subject to catastrophic failure, including, e.g., ruptured passivation, electrothermal migration, splattered aluminum, contact spiking, dielectric failure and the like. Alternatively, an ESD event can damage a device even though the device continues to function. Damage of this type constitutes latent defects, which are hard to detect and significantly shorten the life of such damaged ICs.
Under the conventional art, it is common to rely on the physical and electrical size of output (e.g., off-chip) driver circuits, to provide electrostatic discharge protection. The output driver itself generally provides for enhanced ESD protection through the use of a large total width of a multiple-finger structure and a wide contact-to-poly spacing.
However, the effectiveness of this conventional approach to electrostatic discharge protection has been decreasing as integrated circuit technology advances. The general trend of ever smaller device geometry and decreasing circuit area favors a decreasing chip size. Accordingly, the die area available for output circuits continues to decrease, which lessens the ESD absorption/mitigation capabilities of such output circuits.
Unfortunately, there is a growing need for even higher levels of electrostatic discharge protection than before. This promotes use of an independent ESD device in parallel with the output driver for ESD protection.
In general, the gate of an output driver is connected to an internal circuit, e.g., to receive the signal to be output. This form of connection generally makes the output device snapback much faster in response to an ESD event than if the gate of the output driver was grounded. In order to fully protect the output driver, a separate ESD device must have a trigger voltage lower than a breakdown voltage of the output driver, as well as having an ultra-low on-resistance even in a high ESD current regime.
As used herein, the term breakdown voltage refers to both oxide breakdown voltage as well as junction breakdown voltage. In general, the lower of these two voltages is a point at which an integrated circuit fails to operate, and actual physical damage may occur. Either of these voltages may be lower than the other (in magnitude) depending upon a wide variety of construction and process variables.
An ESD protection device should also have a holding voltage greater than the maximum operating voltage of the circuit to prevent the circuit from turning on during an ESD event. Otherwise the circuit may be permanently damaged due to high ESD currents that cannot be sustained by the circuit itself. When the snapback trigger voltage is greater than a breakdown voltage, damage to the integrated circuit can occur if an ESD event causes a voltage that is greater than the lowest breakdown voltage.
IC manufacturers attempt to design metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) that have a desirable relationship between snapback trigger voltage and snapback holding voltage for use in ESD protection devices for IC applications. However, these parameters are constrained by the IC manufacturing process and by circuit performance considerations. Thus, an optimal combination of snapback trigger voltage and snapback holding voltage is not always available.
Therefore, a need exists for systems and methods for floating gate structures with high electrostatic discharge performance. A need also exists for systems and methods for a desirable combination of snapback trigger voltage and snapback holding voltage that also satisfies the above need. A further need exists for systems and methods for floating gate structures with high electrostatic discharge performance that is compatible and complementary with existing systems and methods of integrated circuit design and manufacturing. Embodiments in accordance with the present invention provide for these needs.
Embodiments in accordance with the present invention embed a diode device into a floating gate electrostatic discharge protection structure.
Accordingly, systems and methods for floating gate structures with high electrostatic discharge performance are disclosed. In one embodiment, a semiconductor structure includes a floating field gate device. The floating gate device includes an embedded diode characterized as having less temperature dependence than a Zener diode. The breakdown voltage of the embedded diode may be, greater than an operating voltage of an associated integrated circuit and a snapback trigger voltage of the embedded diode is lower than a breakdown voltage of the semiconductor structure.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a semiconductor structure for electrostatic discharge protection includes a plurality of first fingers coupled to an output pad and a plurality of second fingers interlaced between the first fingers and coupled to a ground pad. The semiconductor structure further includes a plurality of floating gates interposed between the first and second fingers. The first fingers comprise an embedded hybrid diode characterized as having a diode breakdown voltage lower than a breakdown voltage of the semiconductor structure and a snapback trigger voltage less than the breakdown voltage of the semiconductor structure.
In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, a semiconductor structure includes a circuit for driving an off-chip output. The circuit includes a pull-down device. The semiconductor structure further includes a hybrid diode device embedded in the circuit characterized as having a trigger voltage below a breakdown voltage of the pull-down device.
In accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention, an electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection circuit for an integrated circuit (IC) for providing protection during an ESD event includes a current flow control component and a current flow direction control component coupled in series to the current flow control component. The snapback holding voltage of the electrostatic discharge protection circuit is greater than an operating voltage of the integrated circuit and a snapback trigger voltage of the electrostatic discharge protection circuit is lower than an oxide breakdown voltage of the IC.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. Unless otherwise noted, the drawings are not to scale.
Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with these embodiments, it is understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the invention.
Under the conventional art, a diode, e.g., a Zener diode, may be utilized along side an output driver circuit to provide enhanced electrostatic discharge performance. Conventionally, such a diode was a separate circuit in addition to the output driver circuit. Embodiments in accordance with the present invention form an embedded diode at the emitter or source of a floating gate ESD protection structure, e.g., such a diode is part of the floating gate ESD protection structure, in contrast to the conventional art method of utilizing a separate diode. The embedded diode leads to a sharp decrease in trigger voltage (Vtrig), and a drastic increase in substrate current (Isub) responsive to positive electrostatic discharges. The large substrate current enhances the electron injection from the emitter or source, leading to a reduction in the on-resistance due to conductivity modulation.
However, this benefit may be offset by a detrimental increase in the Gummel number of the device as the deep p+ implant is performed. To improve this, the diode may be formed in a multiple-finger ESD device with a floating gate. It is appreciated that the term “floating gate” does not exclude a gate comprising polysilicon. In this case, the on-resistance may be reduced down to the order of tenths of an ohm. Therefore, this novel ESD structure is well suited for low-voltage output protection and enables human body model (HBM) ESD failure thresholds greater than 9 kV.
It is appreciated that embodiments in accordance with the present invention are well suited to formation in n type materials as well. Due to the well known duality of semiconductor structures, one of ordinary skill in the art may exchange n type conduction for p type conduction to produce alternative embodiments of the present invention. Such variations are considered within the scope of the present invention.
Floating gate structure 100 comprises a plurality of stacks 125 of n++ region 110 disposed over p+ junction 120. The n++ regions 110 of stack 125 are coupled to output pad 150, which may comprise passivated metal, typically for coupling to an external pin of an integrated circuit package.
A plurality of floating gates 130, e.g., field oxide, is adjacent to either side (in this view) of stacks 125. On the other side of floating gates 130, e.g., the side opposite from stack 125, is a grounded region 140 of n type material. Thus floating gate structure 100 comprises multiple instances of a floating gate 130, a stack 125, a floating gate 130 and ground region 140.
As another way of viewing floating gate structure 100 in the view of
It is to be appreciated that an instance of n++ region 110, floating gate 130 and n+ region 140, in conjunction with p type material 160, forms a p channel field effect transistor. Such a device may be used to couple output pad 150 to ground, e.g., to pull down the output terminal.
It is to be further appreciated that stack 125 forms two different types of diodes. Diode 107 is formed between n++ region 110, acting as a cathode, and p type material 160, acting as an anode. Diode 107 is a p/n type diode with a positive temperature coefficient. Diode 105 is formed between n++ region 110, acting as a cathode, and p+ junction 120, acting as an anode. Diode 105 is a Zener type diode with a negative temperature coefficient. The Zener diode 105 generally has a lower trigger voltage than a pull down transistor formed by instance of n++ region 110, floating gate 130 and n+ region 140, in conjunction with p type material 160.
By combining two types of diodes with opposite temperature coefficients, e.g., a diode with a positive temperature coefficient and a diode with a negative temperature coefficient, stack 125 forms a novel hybrid diode structure with substantially less (in magnitude) temperature variation than diodes of the conventional art. The area of diode 107 should be about equal to the area of diode 105, depending upon doping concentrations, resistance, and the like. It is appreciated that other temperature coefficients for the novel hybrid diode may be desirable in alternative embodiments in accordance with the present invention, and that such other temperature coefficients may be achieved by forming differing ratios of diode areas.
It is to be appreciated that the diode breakdown voltage of floating gate structure 100 may be adjusted via well known variations in doping concentrations and the like. Further, the diode breakdown voltage may be constructed so that it is different that a breakdown voltage of an associated integrated circuit, e.g., an integrated circuit protected by floating gate structure 100. Such diode breakdown voltage(s) should be less than the breakdown voltage(s) of the associated integrated circuits.
Floating gate structure 200 comprises output pad 250, which may comprise passivated metal, typically for coupling to an external pin of an integrated circuit package. Fingers of output pad 250 run down (in the view of
Region 260 is a ground pad of p+ material disposed over metal 280. Fingers of region 280 run up (in the view of
The width (in the view of
Floating gate structure 200 exhibits a snapback holding voltage that is greater than the operating voltage of the hybrid diode 125 (
The use of an embedded hybrid diode 125 may ensure that part of the holding voltage is sustained by the hybrid diode in conduction mode such that the remaining holding voltage is insufficient to cause latchup. As a result, during an ESD event the floating gate structure 200, including hybrid diode 125, may drain the ESD induced current, hence serving as an ESD protection device for an associated integrated circuit (IC). After the ESD event, the operating voltage cannot sustain the conduction mode, forcing the hybrid diode off, thereby protecting the floating gate structure 200 and an associated integrated circuit from damage.
In layout alternative 284, a plurality of p+ “islands” 222 and 223 overlay n++ material 212. The p+ islands 222 and 223 may take a variety of shapes, including, but not limited to the illustrated circles and squares. In layout alternative 286, “strips” of p+ material 224 are formed near the edges of n++ material 213. For example, strips 224 may be above or below the plane of material 213.
In yet another alternative layout 288, islands of p+ material, e.g., islands 222 and/or 223, are formed near the edges of n++ material 214. These and other layout alternatives may be utilized to vary the characteristics of the novel embedded diode, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
Embodiments in accordance with the present invention provide for systems and methods for floating gate structures with high electrostatic discharge performance. Embodiments in accordance with the present invention provide also provide for a desirable combination of snapback trigger voltage and snapback holding voltage. Further, embodiments in accordance with the present invention provide for systems and methods for forming floating gate structures with high electrostatic discharge performance that is compatible and complementary with existing systems and methods of integrated circuit design and manufacturing.
Various embodiments of the invention are thus described. While the present invention has been described in particular embodiments, it should be appreciated that the invention should not be construed as limited by such embodiments, but rather construed according to the below claims.
This Application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/760,081, filed Jan. 18, 2006, entitled “Low Voltage Output Driver with High Performance Electrostatic Discharge Performance” to Luo and Demirlioglu, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference for all purposes. This Application is a Continuation In Part of co-pending, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/190,682, filed Jul. 26, 2005, to Luo et al., entitled “Electrostatic Discharge Protection Circuit for Integrated Circuits,” which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4922371 | Gray et al. | May 1990 | A |
5055896 | Williams et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5072266 | Bulucea et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5321289 | Baba et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5374565 | Hsue et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5416036 | Hsue | May 1995 | A |
5416351 | Ito et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430315 | Rumennik | Jul 1995 | A |
5455444 | Hsue | Oct 1995 | A |
5468667 | Diaz et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5496751 | Wei et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500547 | Yamaguchi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502320 | Yamada | Mar 1996 | A |
5519242 | Avery | May 1996 | A |
5529941 | Huang | Jun 1996 | A |
5545909 | Williams et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547880 | Williams et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559352 | Hsue et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5567634 | Hebert et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5581104 | Lowrey et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585299 | Hsu | Dec 1996 | A |
5637898 | Baliga | Jun 1997 | A |
5637900 | Ker et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643820 | Williams et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648283 | Tsang et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654574 | Williams et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661322 | Williams et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5672527 | Lee | Sep 1997 | A |
5674761 | Chang et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677205 | Williams et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5733794 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5850095 | Chen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5877534 | Williams et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5932916 | Jung | Aug 1999 | A |
5953601 | Shiue et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5998833 | Baliga | Dec 1999 | A |
5998836 | Williams | Dec 1999 | A |
5998837 | Williams | Dec 1999 | A |
6044018 | Sung et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046470 | Williams et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049108 | Williams et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060752 | Williams | May 2000 | A |
6078090 | Williams et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6140678 | Grabowski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168996 | Numazawa et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6211018 | Nam et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6255683 | Radens et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268242 | Williams et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277695 | Williams et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6347026 | Sung et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6365462 | Baliga | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6365941 | Rhee | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368922 | Yu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391721 | Nakagawa | May 2002 | B2 |
6413822 | Williams et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6514839 | Ker et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6548860 | Hshieh et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6631060 | Su et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642109 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645802 | Li et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6661054 | Nakamura | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6680833 | Morishita | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6700158 | Cao et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6815775 | Ker et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855593 | Andoh et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861701 | Williams et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6919603 | Brodsky et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927455 | Narazaki | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7019368 | McCollum et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7419878 | Williams et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7482218 | McCollum et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7544545 | Chen et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7583485 | Luo et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7612431 | Chen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7642164 | Xu et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7781826 | Mallikararjunaswamy et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8072013 | Chen et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8367500 | Xu et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8582258 | Luo et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8629019 | Xu et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20020030231 | Okawa et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020063289 | Su et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020074585 | Tsang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030030092 | Darwish et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030071310 | Salling et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040075145 | Shibib | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040124472 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050036251 | Mallikarjunaswamy et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050275054 | Berndlmaier et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060208340 | Glenn et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060268479 | Bischof | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0220789 | May 1987 | EP |
0620588 | Oct 1994 | EP |
1186023 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1351313 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1403914 | Mar 2004 | EP |
S62-279677 | Mar 1987 | JP |
63-081984 | Apr 1988 | JP |
05090520 | Apr 1993 | JP |
H06-350090 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7202129 | Aug 1995 | JP |
7273320 | Oct 1995 | JP |
09-129877 | May 1997 | JP |
10335486 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2000091344 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000156421 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001077314 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001257349 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002208677 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002246596 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002270841 | Sep 2002 | JP |
20020016080 | Sep 2002 | JP |
20020110978 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2002-274640 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004134793 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004247455 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005520349 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2011233641 | Nov 2011 | JP |
1019990024045 | Mar 1993 | KR |
1221033 | Sep 2004 | TW |
1225281 | Dec 2004 | TW |
1231988 | May 2005 | TW |
Entry |
---|
Aitchison, R. E., “Zener Diodes as Reference Sources in Transistor Regulated Power Supplies,” Proceedings of the I.R.E. Australia, Jun. 1, 1959, pp. 350-352. |
Bett, N., “Diret-voltage References,” PROC. IEE, vol. 122, No. 10R, Oct. 1, 1975, pp. 1071-1076. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070236843 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60760081 | Jan 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11190682 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 11655493 | US |