None.
The invention generally relates to an apparatus for protecting internal floating roofs by leveling support legs and lining and leveling a floating roof support that floats on top of the stored product within a storage tank. In particular, the invention relates to an apparatus for leveling the floating roof to reduce stress on the roof and protecting the roof support legs and bottom lining by inserting isolators with optional isolator spacers into the metallic internal roof support legs to obtain the desired height where the isolators engage the inner leg surface of the metallic roof support legs to removably maintain their position and the isolators engage the strike pad on the bottom of the tank to prevent damaging the lining/coating from repeated engagement caused by the raising and lowering of the fluid within the tank and corrosion caused therefrom.
Storage tanks are a vital piece of equipment in modern industrial life, particularly regarding hydrocarbon transportation, processing and use. In most storage environments, the fluid being stored can evaporate and be lost. Where the roof of the storage tank rests directly on the surface of the stored liquid, it minimizes loss of the stored liquid by evaporation. Two well-known types of storage tanks where a roof rests directly on the liquid are external floating roofs (EFRs) and internal floating roofs (IFRs). IFRs have a fixed roof above a floating roof, the fixed upper roof preventing rainfall from falling onto the floating roof. EFRs lack a fixed roof, and the floating roof is exposed to the elements.
For EFRs while they are sittings on the legs on the tank bottom during repair, maintenance, cleaning and inspections, if the EFR is not level it can become unstable during a heavy rain because of rain loading on a lower side. Uneven rain loads can add more stress on the roof, which can be transmitted to the tank bottom causing further settling and exacerbating pre-existing slope of the floor.
Floating roofs storage tanks are routinely provided with support legs.
During normal operation, with the roof floating up or down on the liquid stored in the tank, the pipe support legs are not in contact with the floor of the tank and are functionally inoperable. Under normally operation conditions, the legs may be maintained in a low position extending a lower distance from a lower surface of the lid to maximize the amount of movement of the lid allowed to accommodate the liquid level.
When the roof is not in floating normal operating position, for example when the roof is landed for repair or cleaning, the support legs are usually moved to a high leg position to provide more head room for persons working inside the tank under the floating roof.
To maintain the roof in a level position, the support legs need to be able to accommodate irregularities in the floor of the tank. Over the large surface area of storage tanks, there is rarely a perfectly level floor. Rather, the floor of such tanks is usually irregular. In prior art equipment, there was no easy way to level the support legs to accommodate irregularities in the floor. Failure to accommodate irregularities in the floor induced stress and strain on the roof risking damage to the roof, including the pontoons typically disposed around edges of the roof.
The support legs could be torch-trimmed (cut) on site, but that process is slow and expensive process and one that introduces unnecessary risk in a refinery or tank farm environment where flammable liquids and gases are often present. The trimming of support legs results in legs that have been shortened from their original engineered design. The act of cutting often causes corrosion of the remaining leg portion enhancing the risk of subsequent corrosion. Further, after the hydro testing between each service cycle, the floor often settles requiring further adjustment of the support legs involving another round of torch cutting.
Prior art equipment also provided no effective way to protect the tank bottom, including usual expensive coatings or linings, when the support legs set down on the tank bottom. The support legs thus usually penetrate the coating or lining exposing the metal tank to harsh chemicals (such as hydrogen sulfide and resulting sulfuric acid). When the coating or lining gets damaged by the support legs, it can let the noted harsh chemicals and water (which is heavier than hydrocarbons usually stored in floating roof tanks) between the coating or lining causing fast corrosion of the tank bottom and, over time, resulting in leaks and a tank bottom replacement.
The present invention includes a support leg leveling apparatus. The leg leveling apparatus includes an isolator affixed to the bottom of each support leg and includes several different sizes of leveling spacers that allow simple adjustment of support leg length. It also preferably protects the coating on the lower portion of the tank and cathodic protection for the tank as well as minimizing “cookie” buildup in the legs. The present invention protects the bottom of the support legs from damaging the coating or lining. The present invention allows the floating roof to always have a level, stress-free surface customized to accommodate irregularities in the tank floor.
There have thus been outlined, rather broadly, the more important features of the invention in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood, and in order that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. There are, of course, additional features of the invention that will be described hereinafter and which will form the subject matter of the claims appended hereto.
In this respect, before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in this application to the details of construction and to the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception, upon which this disclosure is based, may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods and systems for carrying out several purposes of the present invention. Additional benefits and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention relates from the subsequent description of the preferred embodiment and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Further, the purpose of the foregoing abstract is to enable the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the public generally, and especially the scientist, engineers and practitioners in the art who are not familiar with patent or legal terms or phraseology, to determine quickly from a cursory inspection the nature and essence of the technical disclosure of the application. The abstract is neither intended to define the invention of the application, which is measured by the claims, nor is it intended to be limiting as to the scope of the invention in any way.
A floating roof 114 is disposed within the cavity 108 and, in operation, rests on the surface of a liquid. A pontoon 116 is typically disposed around a periphery of the roof floating 114. The pontoon 116 serves multiple purposes including adding rigidity to a periphery of the floating roof 114, ensuring buoyancy, particularly if the roof should become loaded with rainwater (where a fixed roof is not present to shed rainfall). When not in operation (as shown), the floating roof 114 rests on a plurality of legs. Some of the legs penetrate the pontoon 116 and are thus called pontoon legs 110. Other legs penetrate the central floating roof deck and are called deck legs 112.
At the bottom of each leg is a striker pad 310. The striker pad 310 is preferably affixed to the tank bottom 106. The striker pad 310 provides a sacrificial surface upon which each leg rests. To the extent the leg may scratch a coating on the striker pad 310, it acts as a sacrificial member preventing the bottom 106 from being eroded by friction or action of harsh chemicals.
It is preferable that the bottom 106 and the shell 104 be protected by a coating up to at least a foot above the bottom 106. The coating helps protect the metal of the shell 104 and bottom 106 from action of harsh chemicals often present in hydrocarbon storage tanks. Hydrocarbons frequently contain hydrogen sulfide. Hydrogen sulfide is corrosive to metal on its own account. Further, any water present in the tank (whether produced water entering the tank with the hydrocarbons or rainwater entering the tank) typically settles on the bottom 106 since water is typically denser than hydrocarbons. The interaction of water and hydrogen sulfide can produce extremely corrosive sulfuric acid. Sludge with higher concentrations of harsh chemicals typically builds up on the bottom 104. Sludge can reach depths of a foot or more. The coating helps prevent corrosion of the bottom 106 and shell 104 from the sludge, harsh chemicals and water.
As previously discussed, in operation, the floating roof 114 floats on the surface of a stored liquid. To maximize the flexibility of the tank to allow for fluctuation in the stored volume, the legs are preferably positioned closer to the floating roof 114 than the legs would be when the tank is out of service. Therefore, a pin hole 410 is provided for engagement with more than one corresponding hole in a leg allowing selection of different leg positions for operational versus non-operational status. The operational status preferably provides enough space between the bottom 106 and the roof 114 to accommodate sludge buildup. If the roof 114 ever could directly rest on the sludge buildup, there is a risk that the roof would become so solidly affixed to the bottom 106 that it could not be raised again.
When switching between operational and non-operational modes, the roof 114 may be lifted by air, water or oil. To lift the roof 114, each leg preferably includes a leg hook eye 408. The roof may be pinned on high leg to let the tank be drained of product and then cleaned for inspection and repair purposes. During repair, or if a leg is to be removed for cleaning or repair, it will be a jacking device and a small mechanical lifting device to pull the leg.
At the bottom of each support leg 110, a base of the isolator 500 rests on the striker pad 310. The base creates separation between the support leg 110 and the striker pad 310. The base hereinafter referred to as a foot 420. Shown above the foot 420 is an optional spacer 416. As shown in
The isolator 500 includes a body 506 preferably having a tapered upper end 504 to facilitate insertion and a foot 420 mounted at the other end. Defined through the isolator 500 is a continuous fluid passage shown with dashed lines. An upper portion of the body 506 defines a plurality of fins 508 thereon. As the isolator 500 is inserted, the fins 508 are deformed slightly in pressing engagement with an inner surface of the leg cavity 502. The 508 thus resist removal of the isolator 500. This pressing engagement retains the isolator 500 in place. Such ribs are used in a wide variety of applications and made from a variety of materials. Applicant incorporates by reference U.S. Pat. No. 4,810,144 for a Tube Connector issued Mar. 7, 1989 (teaching metallic ribs); U.S. Pat. No. 5,308,205 for a Plastic Retaining Peg, For Furniture Fittings issued May 3, 1994.
A spacer 418 is shown having been slidingly inserted onto the body 506. Preferably, a range of spacer sizes is provided allowing a user to more easily accommodate irregularities in the bottom 106 such as the unlevel surface 107 shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2847755 | Mummert | Aug 1958 | A |
3203574 | Bodley | Aug 1965 | A |
3445026 | Korn | May 1969 | A |
4070044 | Carrow | Jan 1978 | A |
5353941 | Benvegnu et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5449084 | Wade | Sep 1995 | A |
5490605 | Cutts | Feb 1996 | A |
5628421 | Jolly | May 1997 | A |
8863974 | Afeef | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9045279 | Eggemeyer | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20120152950 | Al-Subaiey | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20170121103 | Ellis | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220315323 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |