Patent Application
20140178638
One or more embodiments of the present invention relates to a floor lining insulation underlay with a slip-inhibiting surface configuration, as per the preamble of claim 1.
When laying floor linings which are produced in large-area form from individual floor lining segments by means of plug-together connections, it must basically be ensured that said plug-together connections in the regions of the seams do not flex under the loads acting on the floor lining and thus form gaps between the floor lining segments.
Said problem arises in particular from the fact that, in general, such floors are laid in a floating fashion, that is to say said floors are not laid so as to bear with an accurate fit against the walls, but rather expansion gaps with respect to the walls are maintained such that subsequent stresses in the floor linings can be reliably prevented. This however conversely yields the problem that a certain expansion of the floor lining is desired in particular in a vertical direction, for which reason the plug-together connections between the individual floor lining segments must prevent said connections from flexing for example under weight-induced loading or else under horizontally acting shear forces, for example during the sliding of furniture and under the loading of seat rollers.
When laying floor linings such as parquet and laminate, it is generally not a problem for the corresponding plug-together connections to be dimensioned such that both vertical and also horizontal loading of the plug-together connection is possible without the connections flexing in the process. This is a greater problem in the case of floor linings which have considerably smaller thicknesses of, for example, only 3-6 mm, such as is the case with modern plastics linings with click-together or plug-together systems, for example vinyl design floors.
These are very thin floor linings which likewise have plug-together connections, wherein, owing to the thin nature of said floor linings, said plug-together connections are capable of withstanding only relatively low forces. It has proven to be a problem here that such floors can withstand both vertical and also horizontal loads less effectively than the thicker floor lining designs mentioned above.
One or more embodiments are illustrated by way of example, and not by limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings, wherein elements having the same reference numeral designations represent like elements throughout and wherein:
Against this background, the insulation underlay beneath a floor lining covering of said type has an additional task imparted to it aside from the actual insulation action, specifically a stabilizing function with regard to vertical and horizontal forces introduced into said floor linings. As regards vertical loads on the floor linings, the corresponding insulation underlays should, in order to prevent vertical weight-induced loads from leading to deformations in a vertical direction, be designed to exhibit greater pressure resistance than would be required for example in the case of floor linings such as parquet and laminate.
To absorb the abovementioned horizontally acting shear forces which are relevant in particular for the plug-together connections between the elements for example of a thin vinyl floor, an adhesive connection to the insulation underlay is generally provided, because the floor lining segments adhesively bonded to the insulation underlay are secured against horizontal displacement. Insulation underlays with a surface with an adhesive coating have the effect here of restricting the horizontal mobility of the floor lining segments laid on said insulation underlay, but simultaneously have the disadvantage that, as a result of said adhesive bond, the process of laying the floor lining segments is made considerably more difficult.
In this way, it is no longer possible for the floor lining segments to be slid into the desired position on the insulation underlay, because said floor lining segments adhere to the surface of the insulation underlay. Furthermore, in the case of the insulation underlays with an adhesive surface used in the prior art, a corresponding protective foil must be removed from the adhesive layer on the insulation underlay, which constitutes an additional working step and also makes the production of the insulation underlays more expensive.
It is also a disadvantage that the position of a floor lining segment, once it has been laid on said sticky insulation underlay, can be corrected only with difficulty without damage being caused to the insulation underlay. Also, when the floor lining is walked on or when objects are placed on the floor lining, undesired side-effects can arise as a result of the alternating adhesion of the floor lining to, and re-detachment of the floor lining from, the insulation underlay.
Against this background, it is an object of one or more embodiments of the present invention to provide a floor lining insulation underlay with a slip-inhibiting surface configuration, which floor lining insulation underlay does not have an adhesive layer and nevertheless, by means of its surface configuration, counteracts a horizontal displacement of the floor lining on the insulation underlay.
This is achieved according to one or more embodiments of the invention by means of an insulation underlay as per the features of claim 1.
The further claims relate to advantageous refinements of the invention.
Here, the inventive solution provides that the insulation underlay, which is generally composed of a foamed plastic, has a special surface coating directly applied to it, or alternatively a foil with said special surface coating is laminated onto the insulation underlay.
The central inventive feature in the case of this specially applied surface coating is that it increases the sliding friction coefficient or the sliding friction number μ of the insulation underlay surface to a value greater than 0.5. This is however achieved without the surface imparting an adhesive effect as regards a connection between the floor lining segments and the insulation underlay in a vertical direction.
The increase of the sliding friction coefficient μ is in this case such that the floor lining laid on the insulation underlay is secured against a vertical movement on the insulation underlay but, at the same time, it is still ensured that the individual floor lining segments can be slid to a limited extent during the process of laying them. Also, as a result of the fact that said surface coating is not sticky, it is ensured that the floor lining segments can be easily lifted from the insulation underlay at any time during the laying process, and thus corrections can be made at any time during the laying of the floor lining segments.
In summary, the result is thus a special surface configuration which, as a result of the increased sliding friction coefficient μ, achieves the desired effect of securing the floor lining segments against a horizontal displacement, without having the abovementioned disadvantages of the adhesive surfaces such as are known in the prior art.
An additional positive effect can be seen in a specific physical problem of floor linings, specifically the expansion of the floor linings when they warm up, for example under the action of direct solar radiation. During such expansion processes, in the case of floor linings laid in a non-floating manner and to a certain extent also in the case of floor linings laid in a floating manner, a turning-up of the floor lining can occur, that is to say the floor lining lifts slightly. In the case of a conventional laying process with adhesive bonding to the insulation underlay, such lifting of the floor lining occurs with simultaneous lifting of the insulation underlay, whereby it is not possible for the floor lining to perform a compensation movement.
The surface configuration according to the invention of the novel insulation underlay has the effect that the floor surface above the insulation underlay can turn up as a result of its corresponding expansion, but in so doing does not remain adhered to the insulation underlay and can thus change its position with respect to the insulation underlay. That is to say the floor surface can, during the corresponding expansion and subsequent contraction, perform a slipping movement with regard to its position relative to the insulation underlay, wherein this is known under the technical term “stick-slip”. This is not possible in the case of adhesive bonding of the insulation underlay, and constitutes a further advantageous aspect of the invention.
The increase of the sliding friction coefficient or of the sliding friction number μ of the surface of the insulation underlays to a value greater than 0.5 can be realized here according to the invention by means of two different surface configurations. The first approach in this case provides a co-extruded polyurethane coating which has a rough or uneven surface. Said surface characteristics result firstly from the basic characteristics of the polyurethane that is used, but secondly also from the manufacturing process, for example from the cooling process during the production of the co-extruded polyurethane coating.
The increase of the sliding friction coefficient or sliding friction number μ results in this case from said surface unevennesses and also from a certain elasticity of said surface, wherein said characteristics, in the interaction thereof, generate a slip-inhibiting characteristic, wherein this relates only to sliding friction and thus does not generate adhesive characteristics.
The second solution likewise provides a surface configuration which is composed in this case of an extruded polyethylene coating. This is a mixture of an elastomer and of a polymer, wherein a further additive is added which prevents blocking of said material such that the material is not sticky. The result of the connection of said materials is a polyethylene coating which duly has the desired dull surface and thus has a relatively high sliding friction number or a relatively high sliding friction coefficient μ, but which at the same time is not sticky owing to the additive for preventing blocking.
According to the invention, said coatings are either applied directly to the surface of an insulation material during the production thereof or else are produced as a separate foil which is then laminated as a slip-inhibiting surface onto the insulation underlays that are used. This yields the advantage that said form of insulation underlay can be used without any further preparation, for example by removal of a covering foil.
During the laying process, it is possible at any time for a laid floor lining segment to be lifted from the insulation layer again, for example if said floor lining segment has been laid in an incorrect position. The crucial function here is that the increase of the sliding friction coefficient μ counteracts only a vertical displacement of the floor lining panels on said insulation underlay, but a lifting movement, for example in the event of the floor lining turning up when it warms up, is readily possible since there is no adhesive bond between the insulation underlay and the floor lining segments.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 202012012025 | Dec 2012 | DE | national |
