The invention relates to a floor mop comprising two mop supporting wings which carry an absorbent mop layer and are hinge-connected to a mop handle and comprising a squeezing slider which is displaceable along the mop handle and has two rigid squeezing arms whose ends can each be brought into engagement with a guide surface on the back side of the respectively assigned mop supporting wings.
Floor mops comprising two mop supporting wings which can be hinged towards one another to squeeze out the mop layer, also known as a butterfly floor mop, are known in various designs. In the floor mops according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,483,720 and International Patent Application PCT/US95/10759, a sleeve displaceable along the mop handle is connected via a guide rod to two clamps pivotally supported on the supporting centerpiece, which on displacement of the sleeve, slide along on the back side of the two mop supporting wings and thereby press these together. In this case, the mop handle must however be rigidly connect to the supporting centerpiece. As a result of this rigid connection, the possible usage of the floor mop is limited because only a specific oblique position of the mop handle with respect to the mop supporting wings is predetermined in their working position.
In another known floor mop of the genre specified initially, the ends of the squeezing arms connected rigidly to the squeezing slider are each connected rigidly via a guide rod to the back side of each mop supporting wing. When the squeezing slider on the mop handle is displaced downwards, the two guide rods act as hinged props which press the two mop supporting wings towards one another in order to squeeze out the mop layer located therebetween. In this case also, the angular position of the mop handle with respect to the mop supporting wings is predetermined in the working position so that the possible usage is limited.
In a known floor mop (U.S. Pat. No. 5,625,918) the mop handle is rigidly connected to a supporting centerpiece of an essentially triangular carrier plate whose two side sections form hinged mop supporting wings. For squeezing out there is hinged downwards a wire bracket which acts on the two mop supporting wings via two squeezing rollers. The attainable squeezing forces are thus only relatively small. The mop carrier has a projecting corner on its front side and can thus only be guided along a straight floor boundary with one of its oblique side edges.
In another known floor mop (U.S. Pat. No. 3,224,025) the mop handle is hinge-connected to the two mop supporting wings which are directly pivotally connected one to the other. The squeezing slider consists of a sleeve which is displaceable along the mop handle and is longitudinally slotted in its lower section, into which the two mop supporting wings are inserted in the folded-together state. The two sleeve sections separated one from the other by the longitudinal slot each act via a roller on a guide surface on the back side of the respectively assigned mop supporting wing. As a result of the direct hinged connection of the two mop supporting wings and the small mutual spacing of the two rollers, the squeezing process is very difficult, at least at the beginning. In this case also, the mop supporting surface has a projecting corner on its front side so that it can only be moved along a straight floor boundary with oblique side edges.
In known floor mops (German Patent Document DE 42 22 948 A1) the mop supporting wings are rectangular-shaped. The water level in the cleaning bucket required to rinse out the mop must thus be selected at least so that the rectangular mop supporting wings, which for ergonomic reasons are usually inserted obliquely into the cleaning bucket, are completely immersed in the cleaning water. In the case of rectangular mop supporting wings, this minimum level of the cleaning water is relatively high so that a relatively large quantity of water must be provided in the cleaning bucket so that the cleaning bucket is heavy.
The maximum force needed to squeeze out the mop is substantially determined by the pivoting moment at the end of the pivoting movement required to pivot the mop supporting wings. Here the surface areas furthest away from the pivot axis make the largest contribution to the squeezing moment since these surface areas furthest away therefrom each act with the largest lever arm. Thus, lever transmissions must be provided at the squeezing devices in order to apply the required squeezing moment at the end of the squeezing movement.
An object of the present invention is thus to develop a floor mop that is easy to handle and easy to squeeze out and manages with a lower cleaning water level.
The present invention provides a floor mop that includes a grip handle that is hinge-connected to a supporting centre-piece to which the two mop supporting wings are pivotally mounted with a hinge edge. Each mop supporting wing forms a rectangular trapezium or triangle whose larger base line forms the hinge edge and the two edges of the mop supporting wings running at right angles to the hinge edge form a common, straight, continuous front edge of the floor mop.
Each mop supporting wing is thus broader at its hinge edge than at its edge opposite the hinge edge. Thus, compared with a rectangular mop supporting wing, its width and therefore also its area decrease with increasing distance from the pivot axis at the hinge edge. Thus, those surface areas which act with a large lever arm are reduced. In this fashion the required maximum squeezing moment is also reduced so that the floor mop can be squeezed out with a smaller force. Working with the floor mop is therefore less strenuous.
The sloping arrangement of the one side edge and the consequent deviation from a rectangular surface of the mop supporting wing has the result that a lower water level is required for a complete immersion of the mop in the cleaning water. For the same total area of the floor mop its depth of immersion is reduced in the oblique position of the floor mop usually used for ergonomic reasons. For the same depth of water a broader cleaning strip is obtained for the same expenditure of force.
The smaller width at the ends of the two mop supporting wings also has the result that the floor mop can be inserted more easily into narrow corners and gaps so that a more thorough cleaning action can be achieved even in the more inaccessible areas of the floor area to be cleaned. Obstacles on the floor can also be avoided more easily.
Each mop supporting wing preferably forms a rectangular trapezium whose larger base line forms the hinge edge. In its outspread position on the floor the mop thus has one continuous front edge containing the two rectangular side edges and two narrower ends which can ultimately become a corner so that each mop supporting wing forms a triangle.
The continuous straight front edge of the floor mop allows this to be brought forward as far as a straight boundary edge of the floor to be mopped, running transverse to the working direction.
The squeezing action via sufficiently stable squeezing arms arranged a sufficient distance apart produces a thorough squeezing on the mop supporting wings hinge-mounted on the supporting centerpiece without the force to be expended herefor being too high at the beginning of the squeezing process.
The mop handle is more suitably connected to the supporting centerpiece via a Cardan joint and the ends of the squeezing arms can be brought into engagement with a guide surface on the back side of the respectively assigned mop supporting wing. The squeezing slider is in this case guided non-rotatably on the mop handle.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention it is provided that the guide surface of each mop supporting wing ascends in the direction of the free end of the plate towards an elevation projecting from this back side of the mop supporting wing. By this means an intensified concluding pressing together of the mop supporting wings is accomplished at the end of the squeezing movement.
The guide surface preferably slopes down towards the mop supporting wing on the side of the elevation facing the free end of the plate. It is thereby achieved that the force to be applied to the squeezing slider after passing over the elevations decreases at the end of the squeezing process and thus gives the user a clear indication that the squeezing process has been completely accomplished and terminated.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention are shown in the drawings and are explained in detail below. In the drawings:
a)-d) shows part views of different embodiments of the roller body or the arched pressure surface at the end of a pressing arm.
The floor mop shown in
The two mop supporting wings 5 and the supporting centerpiece 3 carry an absorbent, squeezable mop layer 6 which in the conventional fashion consists of a sponge layer 7 and a gauze coating 8.
A squeezing slider 9 is displaceable along the mop handle 1. The squeezing slider 9 has a guide sleeve 10 which is guided non-rotatably, longitudinally displaceably along the mop handle 1. For example, in the hole of the sleeve 10 there is provided a longitudinal groove into which a pin 1 a attached to the mop handle 1 engages.
The sleeve 10 is rigidly connected to two squeezing arms 11 which each carry a rotatably supported roller 12 as rotatable rollers at their ends 11a in the exemplary embodiment shown in
It is shown in
When the squeezing slider 9 is moved downwards to initiate a squeezing process on the mop handle 1, the rollers 12 (or in comparable fashion the sphere 15 or the arched pressure surface 1b) each come into engagement with a guide surface 17 on the back side of the respectively assigned mop supporting wing 5. By this means the two mop supporting wings 5 are pivoted towards one another, as shown in
The two guide surfaces 17 on the back of each mop supporting wing 5 ascend in the direction of the free end of the wing 5a towards an elevation 17b which projects from the back side of the mop supporting wing 5 and then slopes down again towards the free end of the wing 5a.
At the end of the squeezing process shown in
From this squeezing position (
Each of the two mop supporting wings 5 forms a rectangular trapezium. The hinge edge 5b in each case forms the larger base line of the trapezium. A rear edge 5e of each mop supporting wing 5 runs at an acute angle to the hinge edge 5e which forms the hinge 4 and is inclined towards the front edge 5c which runs at right angles to the hinge edge 5b.
The free edge 5a of each mop supporting wing 5 lying opposite the hinge edge 5b thus forms the smaller base line of the trapezium. Each mop supporting wing 5 is substantially narrower in the area of its free edge 5a than in the area of its hinge edge 4. The edge 5a can also be reduced in size as far as a point so that the plan form of the mop supporting wing 5 forms a triangle (
The two edges 5c of the mop supporting wings 5 running at right angles to the hinge edge 5b form a common straight, continuous front edge 5d of the floor mop.
Compared with a floor mop having rectangular mop supporting wings, the floor mop shown with a sloping rear edge 5e manages with a lower water level in the cleaning bucket. In the usual oblique position shown in
It is shown in
The distance b between the point of application of the squeezing arm 11 and the hinge edge 5b is at least ⅕ the width c of the mop supporting wing 5.
The mop handle 1 engages in the longitudinal center of the supporting centerpiece 3. Instead, the mop handle 1 can also be offset from the longitudinal center of the supporting centerpiece 3 towards the front edge 5d. The sloping rear edge 5e of each mop supporting wing 5 forms an angle α of 50°-70° with the hinge edge 5b.
The roller 12 can have a circumferential groove which runs on the bulging guide surface 17 (
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 58 510 | Nov 2000 | DE | national |
100 58 630 | Nov 2000 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP01/13670 | 11/23/2001 | WO | 00 | 9/22/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/41744 | 5/30/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2730744 | Vaugha | Jan 1956 | A |
2892201 | Peterson et al. | Jun 1959 | A |
3224025 | Altrock | Dec 1965 | A |
4831677 | Morrison et al. | May 1989 | A |
5272783 | Richardson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5483720 | Decoopman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488750 | Vosbikian et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5625918 | Kieson et al. | May 1997 | A |
5896613 | Courtney et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5926896 | Allemann et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6119297 | Ohm et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6330084 | Chiang | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6418585 | Viner | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6675426 | Ohm et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6854150 | Hirse | Feb 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
365441 | Mar 1976 | AT |
496850 | Nov 1950 | BE |
600206 | Jul 1934 | DE |
4222948 | Feb 1993 | DE |
29920659 | Nov 1999 | DE |
9608991 | Mar 1996 | WO |
9806316 | Feb 1998 | WO |
9909876 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9909876 | Mar 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040060140 A1 | Apr 2004 | US |