This application is a national state entry of International Application No. PCT/FR2009/000684, filed Jun. 10, 2009 designating the U.S., which claims the benefit of French Application No. 08.03278, filed Jun. 12, 2008.
The technical scope of the invention is that of floor protection devices for a vehicle cab and namely the floor of a military vehicle.
It is known to ensure the protection of a vehicle floor by placing an armour plate at a distance from this floor, such plate being fastened to the cab by deformable linking means such as flexible mounts. Patent DE19913845 discloses such a protection device.
The aim is to absorb part of the blast effect of the mine through the deformation of the armour plate whilst leaving a free space enabling the plate to deform without impacting the floor. The deformable linking means also absorb part of the energy of the shock.
However, the device described by this patent does not provide sufficient protection for the vehicle floor. The energy absorption capacities of the linking means are, in fact, insufficient. Furthermore, the solutions described by DE19913845 do not enable the free space located under the vehicle to be used to house equipment or components of the vehicle itself.
Patent DE19935573 discloses a protection device analogous to that proposed by DE19913845. This device comprises a deformable plate positioned under the vehicle floor to which is it connected by longitudinal beams with a layer of shock absorbing material being positioned between the beams and the vehicle. The protection capacities of such a device are also insufficient. Furthermore, the deformable plate is provided with mobility means that may be projected by the shock against the vehicle floor, and the beams are directly into contact with the floor supports and thus communicate the shock received directly to them.
The aim of the invention is to propose a device that firstly provides reinforced protection with a minimal mass for a vehicle floor, and secondly enables the free space under the vehicle floor to be used without deteriorating the protection efficiency.
Thus, the invention relates to a floor protection device for a vehicle cab, device comprising at least one armour plate that is arranged at a distance from the cab floor and which is connected to the latter by deformable linking means, device wherein at least one of the deformable linking means is constituted by a compartmented caisson, that is fastened to the cab on a substantially vertical lateral partition of the latter, the compartmented caisson comprising at least two walls that are substantially perpendicular to the armour plate and which are integral firstly with a lower wall on which the armour plate presses and secondly with an upper wall which presses on the cab, the walls having dimensions such that they buckle on impact.
According to a particular embodiment, the walls will be substantially perpendicular to a lateral partition.
The protection device may comprise at least two caissons integral with a same lower wall, the caissons being positioned at a distance from one another and separated by a space.
Advantageously, the caissons are further fastened to a same lateral plate, the caissons, the lateral plate and the lower wall thus forming a chamber.
The lateral plate may incorporate at least one opening giving access to the space separating the compartmented caissons.
The opening may be blocked by a hatch or cover, the space thus forming a storage case.
The floor protection device may comprise at least three caissons delimiting two spaces.
According to a particular embodiment, the lateral plate may form an angle with respect to the armour plate.
The chamber may furthermore be positioned such that it incorporates a plane upper rim which extends towards the outside of the vehicle beyond the lateral partition, such plane upper rim being parallel to or indistinguishable from the upper walls of the caissons.
According to a variant embodiment, at least one caisson is filled by an energy absorbing material.
The invention will become more apparent from the following description of different embodiments, such description being made with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
a is a cross section view of the previous Figure along the plane referenced AA in
b is a perspective view of the caisson alone,
a and 3b are partial views of a second embodiment of the invention,
a and 4b are partial views of a third embodiment of the invention,
With reference to
In accordance with the invention, a floor protection device 9 is provided that comprises an armour plate 10 (for example, of steel) that is positioned at a distance from the cab floor 8.
The plate 10, is fastened to the cab 2 by means of deformable linking means 11. In accordance with the invention, at least one of the deformable linking means 11 (and preferably all the linking means 11) is constituted by a compartmented caisson.
As may be seen more particularly in
b shows a perspective view of a caisson 11 according to this first embodiment of the invention.
By compartmented caisson, we mean a substantially parallelepipedic structure that incorporates at least two walls 12a, 12b that will be arranged substantially perpendicularly to the armour plate 10. The walls 12a, 12b are integral with a lower wall 14 on which the armour plate 10 presses. The walls 12a, 12b are furthermore integral with an upper wall 13 that presses on the cab 2 and enables the device to be fastened to the latter. Each caisson 11 delimits an inner space 15 which is open laterally at each end of the caisson.
The walls 12a, 12b are thus substantially vertical and are furthermore dimensioned such that they buckle as a result of a shock transmitted by the armour plate 10 due to the detonation of an explosive device. This dimensioning will be performed classically by calculation depending on the material of the walls 12a, 12b and the expected level of shock. The buckling will be all the greater in that the wall is high with respect to its section.
The walls 12a, 12b delimit the inner space 15 of the caisson, they are furthermore also substantially perpendicular to the wall 12a, 12b in question of the cab 2.
This orientation of the walls leads to their section being reduced thereby improving their deformation by buckling. Such a configuration is thus far from that of the longitudinal beams described by DE19935573. Indeed, the latter extend over the full length of the vehicle (thereby increasing the section of the vertical walls of the beams) and they are reduced in height. Such beams absorb little energy by deformation and communicate most of the shock received to the vehicle's structure.
The upper wall 13 will have drill holes enabling the caisson 11 to be fastened to the floor 8 or to the cab 2.
The lower wall 14 will additionally have drill holes enabling the armour plate 10 to be fastened to the caisson 11.
The caissons 11 are made of steel (depending on the level of protection required, they could also be made of another material, for example aluminium or a composite). The walls 12a, 12b ensure the rigidity of the caisson. When an explosive device or mine explodes under the vehicle 1, the armour plate 10 is deformed by the blast effect. The free space 16 between the plate 10 and the floor 8 allows such a deformation without the shock being transmitted to the floor 8.
The loads are communicated by the plate to the caissons 11, which retransmit them to the walls 2a, 2b of the cab. However, the walls 12a, 12b will also deform by buckling. This deformation will consume part of the energy received but will above all attenuate the violence of the shock. Indeed, the energy of the explosion will be transmitted for a less brief duration which will reduce the stresses received by the vehicle and will attenuate the destructive effects on the cab.
It is possible for the caissons 11 to be given different shapes.
a and 3b show another embodiment in which a single caisson 11 is positioned on either side of the vehicle but which has a length that is substantially equal to that of the armour plate 10.
To give the caisson 11 the properties of rigidity/deformability necessary for it to ensure its function of attenuating the shocks, partitions 17 parallel to walls 12a, 12b are arranged inside it (here there are four partitions). The partitions 17 will, for example, be welded to the upper 13 and lower 14 walls of the caisson.
a and 4b show another embodiment in which three caissons 11 are implemented, all integral with a same lower wall 18.
It is no longer necessary, in this case, to provide a specific lower wall 14 for each caisson 11. The lateral walls 12a, 12b and upper wall 13 thus form a U-shaped structure which will, for example, be welded to the common wall 18. When a mine is ignited, the shock received by the armour plate 10 will thus be transmitted to the wall 18 which will ensure the distribution of the shock over the different caissons 11.
With such an embodiment, the caissons 11 will be positioned at a distance from one another. Two neighbouring caissons 11 are thus separated by a space 19.
Advantage may be taken of these spaces 19 to constitute storage areas to be used by the vehicle's crew.
These spaces 19 may also house the organs of the vehicle, for example an exhaust silencer or batteries.
We note that it would also be possible in the embodiment shown in
c differs from
The vehicle thus incorporates a chamber 21 on each side. Each chamber constitutes a compact assembly incorporating the caissons 11 to absorb the shock wave transmitted by the armour plate 10. The lateral plate 20 constitutes another deformable element that completes the caissons 11. It also enables the chamber to be closed thus insulating the inner spaces 19 from the exterior of the chamber. Openings will be advantageously provided in the lateral plate 20 which will carry closing covers to access the internal storage areas 19.
Such an arrangement gives an overall deflector shape to the device 9, such shape ensuring a deviation of the blast received from a mine when the latter is in the vicinity of one of the rims of the armour plate 10.
Furthermore,
This rim 22 is formed here of part of the upper wall 13. It constitutes a step to facilitate access to the vehicle.
We note that in this embodiment, the caissons 11 are not all of the same shape. The end caissons 11a and 11c have lateral walls 12a, 12b that are not parallel. At least one wall (12a) is, however, still perpendicular to the lower wall 18 (and to the armour plate). The other wall 12b is slightly inclined with respect to the lower wall 18. Such an arrangement is intended to adapt the external shapes of the front 11a and rear 11c caissons (and thus of the chamber 21) to the structure of the vehicle. The walls 12a and 12b nevertheless ensure resistance to deformation for the caissons in question.
We note also on this Figure that the caissons 11 incorporate an opening 24 in certain of their lateral walls 12. These openings help to lighten the structure of the chambers and furthermore provide an access for the fastening screws enabling the upper faces 13 of the caissons to be joined to the vehicle cab.
This Figure shows that the lateral plates 20 incorporate openings giving access to the space 19 between the caissons 11. These openings are block by hatches 22 fitted with hinges and locks (not shown).
In all of the embodiments previously described, the caissons 11 are empty. It is possible, by way of a variant, to put a deformable material inside one or several caissons able to complete the absorption of the impact energy. For example, deformable foam, for example metallic foam (such as aluminum foam) may be placed in the caissons. Sand or else a metallic or composite material cell structure, like a honeycomb, may be put in the caissons 11. It is also possible to install a shock absorbing material between the armour plate 10 and the lower wall 14 and/or between the upper wall 13 and the floor of the cell 8.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 03278 | Jun 2008 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2009/000684 | 6/10/2009 | WO | 00 | 12/8/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/153442 | 12/23/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2271310 | Schafer | Jan 1942 | A |
3073647 | Beltz | Jan 1963 | A |
3604374 | Matson et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
4090734 | Inami et al. | May 1978 | A |
4730870 | DeRees | Mar 1988 | A |
5435619 | Nakae et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5533781 | Williams | Jul 1996 | A |
5663520 | Ladika et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5746537 | Kellas et al. | May 1998 | A |
5905225 | Joynt | May 1999 | A |
5997077 | Siebels et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6149226 | Hoelzel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6477934 | Bruhn et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
20080034953 | Barbe et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080111396 | Barbe et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2568803 | Dec 2005 | CA |
666958 | Aug 1988 | CH |
3109976 | Jan 1982 | DE |
8908112 | Aug 1989 | DE |
9218388 | Feb 1994 | DE |
19643757 | Apr 1997 | DE |
197 35 594 | Feb 1999 | DE |
19735594 | Feb 1999 | DE |
19738833 | Mar 1999 | DE |
19740103 | Mar 1999 | DE |
199 13 845 | Sep 2000 | DE |
19913845 | Sep 2000 | DE |
199 35 573 | Feb 2001 | DE |
19935573 | Feb 2001 | DE |
10045685 | Apr 2002 | DE |
19941928 | Oct 2002 | DE |
10250132 | May 2004 | DE |
10355913 | Jul 2005 | DE |
202004015490 | May 2006 | DE |
0001177 | Mar 1979 | EP |
0235091 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0 828 134 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0828134 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0897097 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0899168 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0963903 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1607272 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1607655 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1740902 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1754949 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1 921 416 | May 2008 | EP |
1921416 | May 2008 | EP |
2903179 | Jan 2008 | FR |
2071829 | Sep 1981 | GB |
WO 0181853 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 2007020531 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110079134 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |