The present invention relates generally to modular floor tiles for use in flooring installations. More specifically, the present invention relates to modular floor tiles having load bearing lattices associated therewith.
It is often desired that a flooring installation be suitable for use in a variety of activities. Such flooring installations are often referred to as “multi-purpose” floors. For example, the floor in a typical primary school cafeteria is used to support tables and chairs to allow children to eat, and should be able to withstand repeated movement of tables, chairs and related equipment onto and off of the flooring surface. This same floor is also often used at other times for performance purposes, such as when students present musical or dramatic programs, and should be capable of sustaining movement of heavy equipment (e.g., pianos, electronic sound equipment, etc.) onto and of off the flooring surface. Also, this same floor is often used at other times for athletic or “active play” purposes as a place where children play basketball, kickball, dodge ball, etc. Accordingly, this same floor should be designed to safely allow these types of active play and sports activities.
While the cafeteria floor in this example would be considered a “multi-purpose” floor, most conventional flooring materials are not well-suited for all of these various types of use. It has been found that flooring materials best suited for long wear, ease of cleaning and maintenance and ease of installation, for example, have often been not well suited for active or sports play. This is due, in part, to the fact that flooring suitable for sports or active play should provide a resilient, cushioned response to reduce the risk of injury in falls and to reduce the stress imposed on bones, muscles and joints of users when running, jumping or otherwise actively playing on the flooring.
However, most so-called multipurpose floors are generally very hard and do not provide an adequate level of resiliency. In a similar fashion, most conventional flooring products that provide good resiliency do not also meet the other requirements of a multipurpose floor: e.g., they may be expensive to install and maintain, and may not withstand the heavy loads periodically applied to multipurpose floors. In particular, conventional flooring products that provide good resiliency perform very poorly under “rolling load” conditions (e.g., conditions in which a heavy load is rolled across the floor, as in the case, for example, where a piano is moved across a floor).
One of the most popular types of conventional “multipurpose” flooring is known as vinyl composition tile, or “VCT.” VCT comprises approximately 85% natural limestone, a key ingredient used to make concrete. VCT has proven very popular because it is relatively inexpensive, relatively easy to install and easy to maintain. Despite these attributes, however, VCT has several drawbacks when used as part of a floor that is to be subject to general-purpose use, and is particularly unsuited for active play or sports use.
Perhaps the biggest drawback of VCT is that it is very unforgiving, e.g., it is very much nonresilient. Because of its high limestone content, VCT provides little or no cushioning or shock absorbency, and thus increases the likelihood of injuries occurring during falls, as well as the risk of tendonitis, stress fractures, and joint damage over an extended period of time from playing sports or participating in active play on the VCT floor. This presents a significant problem, especially in school gymnasiums where children are continually participating in active play. Playing daily on a VCT floor can cause both short and long-term injuries to children. For example, without proper protection, a fall from as little as 2 feet, or a direct fall from only 1½ inches, can result in a skull fracture or other traumatic brain injury, as well as broken or fractured bones. Moreover, VCT can be extremely slippery as it does not provide a great amount of surface friction, thus increasing the likelihood of slips and falls.
The present invention provides a floor tile for use in a flooring system, including an upper surface operable for use as a portion of a flooring installation and a support lattice operable to support the upper surface. The support lattice can include a plurality of support members extending downwardly from an underside of the upper surface and terminating in lower sections collectively defining a subfloor contact profile. A plurality of interconnecting members can laterally interconnect two or more of the support members. At least some of the plurality of support members can extend downwardly at an oblique angle to the upper surface.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a floor tile for use in a flooring system is provided, including an upper surface operable for use as a portion of a flooring installation and a support lattice configured to support the upper surface. The support lattice can include a plurality of rails extending longitudinally along an underside of the upper surface and defining a plurality of open spaces therebetween. Each of the plurality of rails can extend downwardly and can terminate in a lower section, with the lower sections collectively defining a subfloor contact profile. At least some of the plurality of rails can be operable to transfer force between the subfloor contact profile and the upper surface in a lateral direction. At least one section of engagement material can be carried by the subfloor contact profile. The engagement material can be formed of a material relatively more pliable than the subfloor contact profile.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a floor tile for use in a flooring system is provided, including an upper surface operable for use as a portion of a flooring installation and a support lattice supporting the upper surface. The support lattice can include a plurality of rails extending longitudinally along an underside of the upper surface and defining a plurality of open spaces therebetween. The plurality of rails can extend downwardly from the underside of the upper surface and can terminate in lower sections defining a subfloor contact profile. A plurality of interconnecting members can laterally interconnect two or more of the rails and can at least partially enclose the open spaces defined therebetween. At least some of the plurality of rails or at least some of the interconnecting members can have an arcuate shape.
There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, the more important features of the invention so that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood, and so that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. Other features of the present invention will become clearer from the following detailed description of the invention, taken with the accompanying drawings and claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention.
Before the present invention is disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular structures, process steps, or materials disclosed herein, but is extended to equivalents thereof as would be recognized by those of ordinary skill in the relevant arts. It should also be understood that terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting.
It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a” and “the” include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a “support member” includes one or more of such support members, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set forth below.
As used herein, relative terms are used to refer to various components of floor tiles, such as “upper,” “lower,” “upwardly,” “downwardly,” etc. It is to be understood that such terms are not used as limitations but rather are used to aid in describing the floor tiles of the present invention in the most straightforward manner. When such terms are used, it is to be understood that they are in reference to the generally accepted orientation of floor tiles when installed or positioned for use. For example, in such an orientation, the floor tile is generally disposed above the subfloor onto which the floor tiles will be installed or placed, with the upper surface of the floor tile exposed upwardly relative to the subfloor.
In addition, the edges of the tiles described herein are at times discussed using the terms “lateral” edges and “end” edges, in order to most clearly identify the novel features of the invention. It is to be understood that the terms “lateral” edges and “end” edges do not limit the scope of the claims herein, and, in particular, it is maintained by Applicants that any structure identifiable as an “edge” of a tile under consideration is considered to read on the claims herein.
As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, when an object or group of objects is/are referred to as being “substantially” liquid-tight, it is to be understood that the object or objects are either completely liquid-tight or are nearly completely liquid tight. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained.
The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, an opening that is “substantially free of” material would either completely lack material, or so nearly completely lack material that the effect would be the same as if it completely lacked material. In other words, an opening that is “substantially free of” material may still actually contain some such material as long as there is no measurable effect as a result thereof.
As used herein, the term “about” is used to provide flexibility to a numerical range endpoint by providing that a given value may be “a little above” or “a little below” the endpoint.
As used herein, the term “subfloor” is to be understood to refer to a variety of flooring structures over or on which the floor tiles of the present invention are to be laid or installed. Examples of subfloors include existing flooring surfaces, such as VCT floors, VAT floors, “Tartan” floors, wooden floors, linoleum floors, ceramic tiles, etc., as well as “unfinished” flooring surfaces such as plywood, particle board, concrete, and the like. It is to be understood that the term subfloor is not to be limited by any commonly used meaning ascribed to the term by any particular field of constructional or architectural endeavor.
As used herein, the term “floor tile” is to be understood to refer to a variety of modular flooring products having a range of sizes. Reference to a “floor tile” can include reference to products commonly referred to as tiles, planks, pads, sections of sheet flooring products, sections of rolled flooring products, etc., as dictated by the particular embodiment in which reference is being made herein to a “floor tile.”
As used herein, the terms “resilient” and “resiliency” are to be understood to refer to a characteristic of a floor tile that allows the floor tile to compress or deflect in response to a load applied to the floor tile and then return, or “rebound,” to the original state of the floor tile. It is to be understood that, when used, herein, the terms “resilient” or “resiliency” are not to be restricted or broadened due to the sometimes erroneous use of such terms in the flooring industry when referring, for example, to floor tiles such as VCT floor tiles, which are not, in fact, resilient, but tend to either not compress (or deflect) when subjected to a load (e.g., fail to provide shock absorption), or tend to permanently deform after compressing when subjected to such a load (e.g., fail to return to an original state).
Distances, angles, forces, weights, amounts, and other numerical data may be expressed or presented herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such a range format is used merely for convenience and brevity and thus should be interpreted flexibly to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. As an illustration, a numerical range of “about 1 inch to about 6 inches” should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited values of about 1 inch to about 6 inches, but also include individual values and sub-ranges within the indicated range. This same principle applies to ranges reciting only one numerical value and should apply regardless of the breadth of the range or the characteristics being described.
As illustrated generally in the attached figures, in one aspect of the present invention a modular floor tile 10 for use in a multi-purpose flooring system is provided. The floor tile or plank can include an upper surface 12 operable for use as a portion of a flooring installation. The upper surface is configured to be used in a variety of applications, from everyday use to sports and active play use.
As best appreciated from
As used herein, the term “subfloor profile” is used to indicate the lowermost portions or sections of the floor tile that are configured to contact a subfloor (not shown) on which the present tiles are laid or installed. While the subfloor profile is suitable for resting on a planar subfloor, the subfloor profile is not necessarily planar, but can include a series of lowermost sections aligned in a plane that can rest on the subfloor. For example, in
A plurality of at least partial openings 19 can be formed between the interconnecting members 20 and the support members or rails 14. The openings can allow the support members and/or the interconnecting members to move or flex in response to a load applied to the upper surface 12 of the floor tile to provide a high level of resiliency to the floor tile. In some embodiments of the invention, the openings can be fully or partially filled with a pliable filler material that can serve to dampen noise and vibration within the floor tile without significantly interfering with flexing of the support members and/or the interconnecting members.
In the floor tiles shown in the figures, the support members or rails 14 and the interconnecting members 20 extend longitudinally beneath the upper surface 12 of the floor tile along substantially all of the length of the floor tile. That is, the support members and interconnecting members can have a length substantially the same as a length of the floor tile. In other embodiments (not shown), the support members and interconnecting members can have a shorter length and/or can include longitudinal interruptions or openings that longitudinally isolate the support members and/or the interconnecting members into distinct, segmented units.
The support members or rails 14 and the interconnecting members 20 provide the present floor tiles with a substantial degree of resiliency, resulting in a floor tile that can be safely used in active play or sports activities. In one aspect of the invention, calculated performance data indicate that the present floor tiles can provide good fall protection from falls as high as 10 to 12 inches from the floor tile. In contrast, it has been found that VAT (a floor tile often erroneously referred to as “resilient”) provides fall protection from only about 1-2 inches, a figure only marginally better than concrete.
The support members 14 can carry load directly between the underside 16 of the upper surface 12 to the subfloor contact profile (e.g., without any intervening structure). In one embodiment of the invention, at least some of the plurality of support members 14 can extend from the underside of the upper surface at an oblique angle to the upper surface, as shown for example, by angle “α” in
This feature of the invention advantageously increases the magnitude and type of loads that can be supported and “absorbed” by the present tiles without the tiles incurring permanent deformation. In particular, it has been found that the present floor tiles are capable of withstanding so-called “rolling loads” equally well, if not better than, conventional floor tiles that provide a playing surface with good resiliency.
While some so-called “resilient” floors, such as VAT and VCT, claim to provide a resilient response, they are, in fact, not properly characterized as “resilient” as they do not provide any significant level of shock absorption due to their high rigidity. Thus, while VAT and VCT floors are capable of providing good rolling load resistance, they fail to provide good shock absorption, impact protection and/or shock attenuation. The present floor tiles have been found to provide both a high level of resiliency and good response to rolling loads. The floor tiles of the present invention are thus well suited for multipurpose flooring, as the tiles provide good resiliency for active play or sports play, yet are sufficiently strong and rigid to allow use in an area utilized for eating (e.g., cafeterias) and/or performance purposes, or for general purpose use.
The upper surface 12 of the floor tile shown in the figures generally includes a substantially continuous, uninterrupted plane that can be easily cleaned and maintained, even in areas of potentially heavy soilage, such as in cafeterias. In other embodiments (not shown), however, the upper surface can include a textured surface or a surface interrupted by indentations or openings, as a particular application may dictate.
The body of the floor tiles of the present invention can be formed from a variety of materials. In one embodiment the body is formed from a polymeric material. Examples of suitable polymeric materials include, without limitation, PVC, EVA, EVP, PP, PE, Acrylics, ABS, and derivatives and combinations thereof. The polymeric floor tiles can also include various fillers, additives, etc., as would occur to one having ordinary skill in the relevant art. The present floor tiles are well suited to be formed using extrusion, protrusion and/or pultrusion technology, such processes being relatively well known in the present field of endeavor. Of course, other manufacturing methods, such as injection molding, can also be utilized to form the floor tiles.
In one aspect of the invention, the upper surface 12, the support members or rails 14, and the interconnecting members 20 can be formed as an integral piece. The floor tiles or planks can be provided in a variety of lengths, and can be cut to specific lengths by the installer when installed (as discussed in more detail below).
As also shown in
In one embodiment of the invention, the engagement material 24 can be applied as relatively long, thin strips at strategic locations along the bottom portions of the tile to provide an interface that is not prone to slippage. In addition, the engagement material can enhance a noise abatement quality of the floor tile: e.g., can aid in reducing or eliminating any sound that might otherwise be generated as the components of the subfloor contact profile contact the subfloor during use. The engagement material can also serve to limit any gouging, abrading or similar disturbance of the subfloor by the flooring tiles. In addition, the engagement material can add to the resiliency of the floor tile by providing additional “cushioning” to the floor tile.
Also, the engagement material can aid in providing a relatively high-friction interface between the bottom of the floor tile and the underlying subfloor. In this manner, the floor tiles are not prone to movement on, about or over the subfloor once installed or placed on the subfloor, even in the case where the subfloor is relatively “slippery.” The present tiles can perform this function without requiring or benefiting from the use of adhesives, the use of which can greatly increase the time and expense of installing floor tiles, and can add the risk of exposure to hazardous chemicals.
In one aspect, the engagement material 24 can be varied according to a desired response, stiffness, performance, impact protection, shock-absorption and/or resiliency of the floor tile. For example, where a more rigid response is desired, the engagement material can be selected to be relatively more stiff. When a more forgiving, or higher resiliency floor is desired, a softer, more pliable engagement material can be selected. The engagement material 24 can be applied to the floor tile at the time of manufacture of the floor tile. For example, the engagement material can be applied during a co-extrusion process. Alternately the engagement material can be bonded, welded, snapped, pressed, rolled or otherwise attached or joined to the floor tile after the body of the floor tile has been formed. The engagement material can be provided in a variety of widths and shapes. As shown in
In the floor tile 10b of
As also illustrated in
Referring again to
It will be appreciated that, as the floor tile 10 is resting upon the subfloor (with no load being carried by the floor tile), the hard stops 17 will not be in contact with the subfloor. As a load is applied to the floor tile, the upper surface of the floor tile will slowly be deflected downward as the interconnecting members 20a, 20c, etc., flex in response to the load. When the interconnecting members flex to a sufficient degree, the hard stops (or strips of pliable material 24b that can be attached to the hard stops) come into contact with the subfloor. As the hard stops will be much more resistant to flexing (due to their relatively rigid geometry in relation to the direction of deflection of the floor tile), the floor tile will effectively stop deflecting at this point and any further loading of the floor tile will result in a very stiff response by the floor tile.
This aspect of the invention can be advantageous in limiting extreme flexure of the components of the floor tile when under extreme loading conditions, to thereby limit failure of the floor tile due to the extreme loading condition.
As also illustrated in
This feature of the invention has been found to advantageously aid in reducing any “cupping” or “bridging” of the floor tiles after manufacture of the floor tiles. As used herein, the terms cupping and bridging refer to flaws in floor tiles that cause floor tiles to not lie completely flat on a subfloor over which the floor tiles are installed (when not subjected to loading). For example, some floor tiles, when experiencing a zero load state, tend to lift off the subfloor at the corners (an example of “cupping”) or tend to lift off the subfloor at the center of the tile (an example of bridging). It is believed that this condition is due, at least in part, to residual stresses formed in components of the tile during cooling of the tile material after manufacturing. As a great many conventional floor tiles include repeating patterns of similarly shaped, if not identical, components, the residual stresses in the component are additive, resulting in sometimes significant bridging or cupping of the tile.
By forming alternating convex and concave sections in the present tiles, the resulting tile is much less susceptible to bridging or cupping, and lies relatively completely flat upon the subfloor over which the present tiles are installed or laid.
As shown in
During a typical installation process (not shown in the figures), an installer can place or lie a first tile in position on a subfloor. A second, adjacent tile can be disposed near a lateral edge of the tile, and a protruding connecting member of one tile can be inserted within a gutter connecting member of an adjacent tile to laterally connect the tiles one to another. If a length of the tile need be adjusted, a simple saw or router cut can be used by the installer to size the length of the tile. A mating connector (40a or 40b) can be inserted between end edges of two lengthwise adjacent tiles, and the two tiles can be pressed together to form an end joint.
This process can be continued until enough modular floor tiles have been assembled to form a substantially continuous sheet that covers the desired area. As the floor tiles are formed from a polymer, installers can easily cut tile lengths or widths to size, as necessary, without requiring a great deal of specialized tooling.
It is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention and the appended claims are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements. Thus, while the present invention has been described above with particularity and detail in connection with what is presently deemed to be the most practical and preferred embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made without departing from the principles and concepts set forth herein.
Priority is claimed to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/787,010, filed Mar. 28, 2006, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2082563 | Bauer | Jun 1937 | A |
2680698 | Schnee | Jun 1954 | A |
3015136 | Doe | Jan 1962 | A |
3531902 | Costa | Oct 1970 | A |
3614915 | Perry | Oct 1971 | A |
3717247 | Moore | Feb 1973 | A |
3802144 | Spica | Apr 1974 | A |
3909996 | Ettlinger et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3946529 | Chevaux | Mar 1976 | A |
4018025 | Collette | Apr 1977 | A |
4054987 | Forlenza | Oct 1977 | A |
4133481 | Bennett | Jan 1979 | A |
4167599 | Nissinen | Sep 1979 | A |
D255744 | Dekko | Jul 1980 | S |
4226060 | Sato | Oct 1980 | A |
4226064 | Kraayenhof | Oct 1980 | A |
4287693 | Collette | Sep 1981 | A |
4361614 | Moffitt, Jr. | Nov 1982 | A |
4436779 | Menconi et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4468910 | Morrison | Sep 1984 | A |
4478905 | Neely, Jr. et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4497858 | Dupont et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4584221 | Kung | Apr 1986 | A |
4590731 | DeGooyer | May 1986 | A |
4596729 | Morrison | Jun 1986 | A |
D286575 | Saunders | Nov 1986 | S |
4640075 | Nuncio | Feb 1987 | A |
4681786 | Brown | Jul 1987 | A |
4694627 | Omholt | Sep 1987 | A |
4715743 | Schmanski | Dec 1987 | A |
4727697 | Vaux | Mar 1988 | A |
4728468 | Duke | Mar 1988 | A |
4807412 | Frederiksen | Feb 1989 | A |
4849267 | Ward et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4860510 | Kotler | Aug 1989 | A |
4877672 | Shreiner | Oct 1989 | A |
4930286 | Kotler | Jun 1990 | A |
4948116 | Vaux | Aug 1990 | A |
5022200 | Wilson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5039365 | Rutledge et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5048448 | Yoder | Sep 1991 | A |
5052158 | D'Luzansky | Oct 1991 | A |
5111630 | Munsey et al. | May 1992 | A |
D327748 | Dorfman, Jr. | Jul 1992 | S |
5143757 | Skinner | Sep 1992 | A |
5185193 | Phenicie et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5190799 | Ellingson, III | Mar 1993 | A |
5205091 | Brown | Apr 1993 | A |
5205092 | Taylor | Apr 1993 | A |
5215802 | Kaars | Jun 1993 | A |
5228253 | Wattelez | Jul 1993 | A |
5229437 | Knight | Jul 1993 | A |
5234738 | Wolf | Aug 1993 | A |
5250340 | Bohnhoff | Oct 1993 | A |
5253464 | Nilsen | Oct 1993 | A |
5295341 | Kajiwara | Mar 1994 | A |
5303669 | Szekely | Apr 1994 | A |
5323575 | Yeh | Jun 1994 | A |
5364204 | MacLeod | Nov 1994 | A |
5365710 | Randjelovic | Nov 1994 | A |
5466489 | Stahl | Nov 1995 | A |
5509244 | Bentzon | Apr 1996 | A |
5527128 | Rope et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5542221 | Streit et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5616389 | Blatz | Apr 1997 | A |
5628160 | Kung | May 1997 | A |
5642592 | Andres | Jul 1997 | A |
5647184 | Davis | Jul 1997 | A |
5682724 | Randjelovic | Nov 1997 | A |
5758467 | Snear et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761867 | Carling | Jun 1998 | A |
5787654 | Drost | Aug 1998 | A |
5815995 | Adam | Oct 1998 | A |
5816010 | Conn | Oct 1998 | A |
5950378 | Council et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
D415581 | Bertolini | Oct 1999 | S |
5992106 | Carling et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6032428 | Rosan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044598 | Elsasser et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047663 | Moreau et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068908 | Kessler et al. | May 2000 | A |
6098354 | Skandis | Aug 2000 | A |
6101778 | Martensson | Aug 2000 | A |
6101788 | Weder et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112479 | Andres | Sep 2000 | A |
6171015 | Barth et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6228433 | Witt | May 2001 | B1 |
6230460 | Huyett | May 2001 | B1 |
6301842 | Chaney et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324796 | Heath | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355323 | Iwen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
D456533 | Moller, Jr. | Apr 2002 | S |
6418683 | Martensson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428870 | Bohnhoff | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444284 | Kessler et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451400 | Brock et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467224 | Bertolini | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6526705 | MacDonald | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531203 | Kessler et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6588166 | Martensson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605333 | Ferreira et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6606834 | Martensson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6617009 | Chen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637163 | Thibault et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6682254 | Olofsson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
D486592 | Hong | Feb 2004 | S |
6684582 | Peart et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6684592 | Martin | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6718715 | Elliott | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D492426 | Strickler | Jun 2004 | S |
6751912 | Stegner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6769219 | Schwitte et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6802159 | Kotler | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6833038 | Iwen et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6878430 | Milewski et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6880307 | Schwitte et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6895881 | Whitaker | May 2005 | B1 |
7021012 | Zeng et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029744 | Horstman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047697 | Heath | May 2006 | B1 |
7065935 | Ralf | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7090430 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7114298 | Kotler | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127857 | Randjelovic | Oct 2006 | B2 |
D532530 | Shuman et al. | Nov 2006 | S |
7211314 | Nevison | May 2007 | B2 |
7299592 | Moller, Jr. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7340865 | Vanderhoef | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7386963 | Pervan | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7516587 | Barlow | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7520948 | Tavy et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531055 | Mead | May 2009 | B2 |
7571572 | Moller, Jr. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7571573 | Moller, Jr. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587865 | Moller, Jr. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
RE41140 | Heath | Feb 2010 | E |
7748176 | Harding et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7748177 | Jenkins et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20040023006 | Mead | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035079 | Evjen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040182030 | Hinault et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040258869 | Walker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050144867 | Clarke | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193670 | Niese et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202208 | Kelly | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204676 | Weitzer | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050252109 | Fuccella et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060070314 | Jenkins et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080909 | Harding et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060265975 | Geffe | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272252 | Moller | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285920 | Gettig et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070289244 | Haney et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080127593 | Janesky | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080216437 | Prevost et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080271410 | Matthee | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090031658 | Moller, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090139160 | Hill | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0044371 | Jan 1982 | EP |
2262437 | Jun 1993 | GB |
2 353 543 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2353543 | Feb 2001 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60787010 | Mar 2006 | US |