The present disclosure relates generally to cushioned flooring systems, and in particular to a flooring apparatus for reducing impact energy during a fall.
It is known that falls represent a leading cause of non-fatal injuries in the United States (Cost of Injury, 1989). In 1985, for example, falls accounted for an estimated 21% of non-hospitalized injured persons (11.5 million people) and 33% of hospitalized injured persons (783,000 hospitalizations). In addition 9% of fatalities (12,866 deaths) were related to falls. Some estimates have said that the cost of fall related injuries in the United States in 2000 was approximately $20 billion dollars.
A number of epidemiological studies report a drastic increase of fall incidence rate in the population over the age of 65, suggesting a direct relationship between aging and the frequency of kill events (Sorock, 1988; Healthy People 2000, 1990; Injury Prevention: Meeting the Challenge, 1989; National Safety Council. 1990: Grisso et al., 1990; DeVito et al., 1988: Waller, 1985; Waller. 1985: Sattin et at., 1990). Although the exact incidence of non-fatal falls is difficult to determine, it has been estimated that approximately 30% of all individuals over the age of 65 have at least one fall per year (Sorock, 1988).
When the dramatic growth in the number of people over 65 and their proportion in the population is considered, this represents a significant health problem. By some estimates, this age group currently makes up 12.4% of the U.S. population, with a projected increase to 19.6% by the year 2030 (Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics, 2004). Of particular note is the growth of the “oldest old” (i.e. those people over 75). In the decade between 1990 and 2000, the greatest growth in the over 55 age group was projected to be among those 75 and older—an increase of 26.2 percent or a gain of nearly 4.5 million (U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census, 1988).
In Injury in America (1985, p. 43) the authors stated that “Almost no current research deals with the mechanisms and prevention of injury from falls (the leading cause of non-fatal injury) . . . . Little is known about the effectiveness of energy-absorbing materials, either worn by persons at high risk or incorporated in the surfaces onto which they fall.”
Typically, current approaches to solving the problem of injury from falls include devices which use composite matting to absorb energy resulting from patient/floor impact during falls. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,636,577, 4,557,475, 4,727,697, 4,846,457, 4,948,116, 4,991,834 and 4,998,717, each describe impact absorbing coverings which utilize air-filled cells or compressible materials to absorb the energy of a fall. Because each of these systems is always compliant (i.e., always deformable under compressive pressures), shoes, feet, and/or other contacts with the flooring surface results in relatively large mat deflections. This has the potential to increase the likelihood of falls due to toe/mat interference during foot swing, and/or presents a problem when an individual attempts to move an object over the floor (e.g., a wheelchair). These factors can be of even greater concern in a health care setting, where many residents may have an unsteady gait and/or utilize wheel chairs for locomotion.
The disclosed floor overcomes at least some of the above-described disadvantages inherent with various apparatuses and methods of the prior art. The example floor includes a flooring system which requires no special clothing or restriction of movement because the floor will act as the injury prevention system. The design incorporates a stiffened floor which remains substantially rigid under normal conditions and deflects under impact (i.e., a pressure greater than a predetermined critical pressure) to absorb the energy of the impact. Accordingly, the example floor offers a novel and effective system to reduce injuries from falls.
An impact-absorbing flooring system is described; with applications in various areas where there is a risk of injury due to fall and/or high-impact. For instance, the flooring system may be utilized in healthcare facilities, in sports facilities, and/or in any other commercial or residential environment. The floor may be manufactured as a single continuous floor, or may be manufactured as a modular tile that may be combined with adjoining tiles to form a floor surface. The flooring system may also take the form of a safety mat or coating for use around slippery areas, such as, for example, bathtubs, showers, swimming pools, etc.
The stiffening columns 22 are at least partially (and possibly completely) surrounded by a resilient underlayment 24. The underlayment 24 may cover at least a portion of the undersurface 26 of the flooring plate 20 and may be secured thereto. Additionally, the underlayment may be secured to at least one of the columns 22. The columns 22 and/or the underlayment 24 (together or separately) are adapted to support the flooring plate 20 at a normal height H above a support surface 28, such as for example, a sub-floor.
The flooring plate 20 may be constructed Of any suitable material including, for example, wood, metal, thermoplastic, such as polyester, polypropylene, and/or polyethylene, and/or any other suitable material. Similarly, the plate 20 may be formed by any suitable manufacturing process, including, for instance, molding, stamping, rolling, etc. Additionally, while in this example the stiffening columns 22 are integrally formed with the plate 20, it will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that the columns 22 may be constructed of any appropriate material and as noted above, may be attached to the undersurface 26 via any suitable method, such as, for example, adhesive, mechanical, and/or other comparable fasteners.
In the illustrated example, the resilient underlayment 24 is a foam material, such as, for example, a polymer foam. However, it will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that the resilient underlayment 24 may be formed from any suitably resilient material, and/or composite material. Furthermore, the resilient underlayment 24 may also be secured to the undersurface 26 of the flooring plate 20 and/or the columns 22 by adhesion, mechanical connection, and/or any other appropriate method.
Turning now to
In
Referring again to
The critical pressure (e.g., the magnitude of the compressive pressure at which the column 22 will buckle) is determined by a number of factors, including, for example, the column length, width, area moment of inertia, material properties, the boundary conditions imposed at the column end points, the distribution of the columns on the plate 20, the angle at which the columns extend from the plate 20, and/or the properties of the underlayment 24. In one example, a desired predetermined critical pressure may be approximately 20 lbs/in2. Because the critical pressure at which buckling of each of the columns 22 will occur is determined by many factors, it is possible to vary the design of the columns 22 and/or the underlayment 24 for a specifically desired critical pressure by varying some or all of these parameters utilizing known analysis methods such as Euler calculations and/or finite element analysis. Therefore it is possible to configure the columns 22 and/or the underlayment 24 so that the flooring apparatus 10 will remain relatively rigid under normal pressure but will buckle under impact pressures typically sustained during a fall. Varying the parameters of the columns 22 and/or the underlayment will permit construction of multiple embodiments having various uses from private dwellings, bathrooms, and geriatric homes to hospitals and athletic events where impact pressures are expectedly variable.
In the illustrated example, both the stiffening columns 22 and the stop columns 127 extend generally perpendicular to the plate 20 and are, in this example, spaced at generally 45° to one another. However, it will be appreciated that the patient of the columns 22 and 127 may be varied as desired. Furthermore, while the length of each of the stiffening columns 22 and the length of each of the stop columns 127 are illustrated as being substantially similar, respectively, it will be understood that the length of each of the columns 22, 127 may vary as desired to provide for different pressure deflection characteristics.
As with the previous example, both the stiffening columns 22 and the stop columns 127 are at least partially surrounded by the resilient underlayment 24. Additionally, the underlayment 24 may be secured to at least a portion of the undersurface 26 of the flooring plate 20 and/or at least a portion of the columns 22, 127. As shown in
Turning now to
In still another example, illustrated in
In at least some instances, the overlayment 921 and/or the plate 920 may be formed of a particular material, such as for instance, a compliant wood material, such as for example cork, cork composites, bamboo, bamboo composites, yew, yew composites, wisteria, wisteria composites, woven wood textiles, any combination thereof, and/or any other suitable material. In one example, the portion of the surface of the overlayment 921 and/or the plate 920 that is exposed may be coated and/or otherwise impregnated with a wear and/or slip resistant material.
As illustrated in
In still other examples, any of the flooring systems 10, 100, 200, 900 may include materials specifically selected for properties such as noise abatement, water resistance, wear resistance, rot resistance, mildew and/or fungal resistance, durability, color, insulation (e.g., R-value), and/or any other desirable material characteristic. For instance, in one example, together the plate 20, the resilient underlayment 24 and the columns 22 may create a flooring system having a noise reduction coefficient of up to 1.0 and/or an insulation R-value of approximately 5 to 50. Additionally, in at least one example (not shown) the example flooring systems may include a radiant heating element including a radiant heating element for a modular bathroom system.
Turning now to
As illustrated in
Turning now to
In yet another example, any of the disclosed the flooring systems 10, 100, 200, 900, may include an alarm and/or other sensor to detect a particular pressure, such as for example, when something and/or someone falls on the flooring system. In one example, the flooring system includes a small proximity sensor, such as a radio frequency (RF) sensor placed in the cavity between the support surface 28 and the underside of the flooring plate 20. The proximity sensor may be arranged in a regular pattern, such as, for instance a regular grid pattern. In this example, the sensors are powered by a nearby wireless transmitter, but it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the sensors may be powered by any suitable power source. In at least one example, the sensors may be calibrated to detect and/or otherwise sense a mass a certain distance (e.g., one foot) above the flooring plate 20. Thus, when an object such as a person is above the sensor network, the maximum output from the network is proportional to sensing the mass of two feet and two legs below the knees, which could be considered a relatively low output level. If a person were to lay down above the sensor, the mass of the entire body would be detected, which would be considered a relatively high output level. Thus, in a high output level (e.g., a person has fallen) the sensors could detect the condition and issue an alarm as it would be likely that a person had fallen on the flooring system and may require assistance.
Although certain example methods and apparatus have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/673,398 entitled “Flooring Apparatus For Reducing Impact Energy During A Fall,” filed Feb. 9, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,109,050, which is a non-provisional application claiming priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/771,630, filed Feb. 9, 2006, entitled “SorbaShock Pressure Reduction Flooring” and from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/793,457, filed Apr. 20, 2006, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1693655 | Murphy | Dec 1928 | A |
2653525 | McGuire | Sep 1953 | A |
3251076 | Burke | May 1966 | A |
3305227 | Henley | Feb 1967 | A |
3438312 | Becker et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3636577 | Nissen | Jan 1972 | A |
3732138 | Almog | May 1973 | A |
3808628 | Betts | May 1974 | A |
3948500 | Korbuly et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4054987 | Forlenza | Oct 1977 | A |
4277055 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4557475 | Donovan | Dec 1985 | A |
4604509 | Clancy et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4727697 | Vaux | Mar 1988 | A |
4805886 | Hassan | Feb 1989 | A |
4807412 | Frederiksen | Feb 1989 | A |
4846457 | Vaux | Jul 1989 | A |
4848058 | Mullen | Jul 1989 | A |
4860516 | Koller | Aug 1989 | A |
4921741 | Mullen | May 1990 | A |
4948116 | Vaux | Aug 1990 | A |
4991834 | Vaux | Feb 1991 | A |
4998717 | Vaux | Mar 1991 | A |
5228253 | Wattelez | Jul 1993 | A |
5234738 | Wolf | Aug 1993 | A |
5251742 | Campbell | Oct 1993 | A |
5368154 | Campbell | Nov 1994 | A |
5509244 | Bentzon | Apr 1996 | A |
5542221 | Streit et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566930 | Niese | Oct 1996 | A |
5713175 | Mitchell | Feb 1998 | A |
5744763 | Iwasa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749111 | Pearce | May 1998 | A |
5761867 | Carling | Jun 1998 | A |
5778621 | Randjelovic | Jul 1998 | A |
5806270 | Solano et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5976451 | Skaja et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992105 | Kessler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026527 | Pearce | Feb 2000 | A |
6029962 | Shorten et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044606 | Hamar | Apr 2000 | A |
6115981 | Counihan | Sep 2000 | A |
6127015 | Kessler | Oct 2000 | A |
6164031 | Counihan | Dec 2000 | A |
6296669 | Thorn et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6394432 | Whiteford | May 2002 | B1 |
6405495 | Kessler et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6457261 | Crary | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487796 | Avar et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6531203 | Kessler | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6878430 | Milewski | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7211314 | Nevison | May 2007 | B2 |
7462253 | Nevison | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7571572 | Moller, Jr. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7575795 | Scott | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7748177 | Jenkins et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8109050 | Ovaert | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8241726 | Scott et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010007236 | Tajima et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030186025 | Scott et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050193669 | Jenkins | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050214498 | Nevison | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050281999 | Hofmann et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070056237 | Kang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087154 | Bird et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070204545 | Ovaert | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080213529 | Gray et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100024329 | Gray et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110072748 | Simonson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1980000034720 | Oct 1981 | JP |
1980000034721 | Oct 1981 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report Corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US07/61933, Mailed Jun. 5, 2008, 2 pgs. |
Written Opinion of the International Search Authority Corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US07/61933, Mailed Jun. 5, 2008, 5 pgs. |
“Accident Facts,” National Safety Counsel, 1990 Edition, 9 pgs., Chicago. |
Philips et al., “Aging and Public Health,” 1985, 23 pgs., Springer Publishing Company, Inc., New York. |
DeVito et al., “Fall Injuries Among the Elderly,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 36, 1988, 8 pgs. |
Tidelksaar, Rein, “Falls in the Elderly: A literature Review,” Age, vol. 11, Issue 3, Jul. 1988, 4 pgs. |
Grisso et al., “Injuries in an Elderly Inner-City Population,” The American Geriatrics Society, 1990, 7 pgs. |
“Healthy People 2000,” National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, 1992, 6 pgs., Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc., Boston. |
“Injury Prevention: Meeting the Challenge,” The National Committee for Injury Prevention and Control, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 5, No. 3, 1989, 4 pgs. |
Older Americans 2004: Key Indicators of Well-Being, Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. Nov. 2004, 160 pages, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. |
Sattin et al., “The Incidence of Fall Injury Events Among the Elderly in a Defined Population.” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 131, No. 6, 1990, 5 pgs., The John Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health. |
Sorock, Gary S., “Falls Among the Elderly: Epidemiology and Prevention,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 4, No. 5, 1988, 8 pgs. |
United States Population Estimates, by Age, Sex, and Race: 1980-1987, U.S. Department of Commerce, Mar. 1988, 13 pgs. |
Waller, Julian A., “Falls Among the Elderly—Human and Environmental Factors,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 10, 1978, 13 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US13/20148, mailed on Apr. 26, 2013, 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130000228 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60771630 | Feb 2006 | US | |
60793457 | Apr 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11673398 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 13342605 | US |