Patent Grant
8205753
The present invention relates to the use of collectors in the flotation treatment of silicate-containing minerals and ores, in particular iron ore, using fatty alkyl ether alkylamine alkoxylate.
Many naturally occurring ores and minerals contain silicate as unwanted accompanying mineral. These include, in addition to iron ore, calcite, phosphate ore and feldspar. In particular in the case of iron ore, the silicate content reduces the quality of the iron ore and interferes in iron production. In order to obtain high-quality iron ore, it is of interest to reduce the silicate content of the iron ore to below 2%. Customarily, the iron ore, in addition to magnetic separation, is separated from the silicate by inverse flotation. For this the ground iron ore is brought together in a flotation cell with water and flotation reagents, wherein the silicate, by the use of a collector, is discharged with the froth, whereas the iron ore remains in what is termed the pulp.
Silicate collectors which are used are, for example, fatty amines, alkyl ether amines and alkyl ether diamines. These are known under the trade name Flotigam®.
Alkyl ether amines and alkyl ether diamines are mainly used in their partially neutralized forms as partial acetates, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,319,987. The reason for this is the improved solubility of the partially neutralized amine functions.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,076,682 describes the combined use of alkyl ether monoamine with alkyl ether diamine for the silicate flotation from iron ore.
In WO 00/62937, the use of quaternary amines for the flotation of iron ore is disclosed.
In WO-93/06935, the synergistic action of ether amines and anionic collectors for iron ore flotation is described.
Silicate flotation, inter alia from iron ore, using alkyloxyalkanamines is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,337.
The collectors which are described in the prior art for silicate flotation, however, exhibit inadequate selectivity and yield. The object of the present invention was therefore to provide an improved collector for silicate flotation.
Surprisingly, it was found that the use of fatty alkyl ether alkylamine alkoxylates leads to a marked improvement of silicate flotation from iron ore compared with the known flotation reagents.
The present invention therefore relates to the use of a compound of the formula (I)
R1—O—R2—NH(2-m)—[(R3)n—H]m (I)
where R1 is a hydrocarbon group having 1-40 carbon atoms, R2 is an aliphatic hydrocarbon group having 2-4 carbon atoms, and also R3 is an alkoxy group, n is a number between 1 and 50, and also m is 1 or 2, as flotation reagent in silicate flotation.
The collector according to the invention can be used alone or in combination with other nitrogenous compounds for the flotation of silicate, in particular from iron ore or calcite. Preferred nitrogenous compounds are alkyl ether amines, alkyl ether diamines, alkylamines or quaternary ammonium salts.
The invention further relates to a process for the flotation of silicate-containing material, by bringing the flotation reagent according to the invention into contact with the silicate-containing mineral.
The invention further relates to a composition containing 1 to 99% by weight of a collector for silicate flotation, which collector is an alkyl ether amine, alkyl ether diamine, alkylamine or quaternary ammonium salt, and also 1 to 99% by weight of a compound of the formula I.
The ratio of alkyl ether amine, alkyl ether diamine, alkylamine or quaternary ammonium salt to the compound of the formula I is preferably between 98:2 and 75:25.
In a preferred embodiment, R1 is an aliphatic hydrocarbon group. It is further preferred that R1 comprises 4 to 22, in particular 6 to 20, and especially 8 to 14, carbon atoms. Particular preference is given to 2-ethylhexyl, isononane, isodecane and isotridecane radicals.
In a further preferred embodiment, R2 is a C2H4 or C3H6 group.
In a further preferred embodiment, R3 is a C2C4 alkoxy group, in particular an ethoxy or propoxy group. R3 can also be a mixed alkoxy group.
In a further preferred embodiment, n is a number between 2 and 40.
In a further preferred embodiment, m is 2.
A particularly preferred embodiment of the invention is a compound of the formula I where R1 is an isotridecane radical, R2 is C3H6, R3 is C2H4—O, n is 2 to 10 and m is 2.
The collectors for silicate flotation which are an alkyl ether amine, alkyl ether diamine, alkylamine or quaternary ammonium salt and those which can be used together with a compound of the formula I are preferably one or more of the compounds of the formulae (II) to (V).
These compounds are
R4—O—R5—NH2 (II)
where R4 is a hydrocarbon group having 1-40, preferably 8 to 32, carbon atoms and R5 is an aliphatic hydrocarbon group having 2-4 carbon atoms;
R6—O—R7—NH—R8—NH2 (III)
where R6 is a hydrocarbon group having 1-40, preferably 8 to 32, carbon atoms, R7 and R8 are one or different aliphatic hydrocarbon groups having 2-4 carbon atoms;
(R9R10NR11R12)+A− (IV)
where R9, R10, R11 and R12 are one or different hydrocarbon groups having 1-22 carbon atoms and A− is a suitable anion;
R13—NH2 (V)
where R13 is a hydrocarbon group having 1-40, preferably 8 to 32, carbon atoms.
The use of the flotation reagent according to the invention can also proceed in combination with frothers and depressants as are known from the prior art. In order to avoid iron ore being discharged in conjunction in the silicate flotation, preferably hydrophilic polysaccharides such as, for example, modified starch, carboxymethylcellulose, or gum arabic, are added as depressants in dosages of 10 to 1000 g/t.
Silicate flotation is preferably carried out at a pH of 7-12, in particular 8-11, which is set, for example, using sodium hydroxide.
The table hereinafter presents the flotation results of the collector according to the invention compared with the standard reagent. Flotation experiments have been carried out on a silicate-containing iron ore.
The standard reagent used (comparative examples 1 (C) to 3 (C)) was a C10-alkyloxypropylamine, which corresponds to a compound of the formula (II) wherein R4 is a decyl group and R5 is a propyl group. The collector B according to the invention (examples 4 to 7) corresponds to the reagent according to the invention of the formula (I) where R1 is C13-alkyl, R2 is propyl and R3 is ethoxy, and also m is 2 and n is 5. Examples 8 to 10 present the synergistic effect linked with the simultaneous use of collector according to the invention and collector of the prior art, wherein collector C corresponds to a mixture of 10% collector B and 90% of the standard collector A. The content of the crude ore was 65.7% Fe.
The results show a consistently increased percentage recovery for a roughly constant Fe content by means of the flotation reagent B according to the invention compared with the standard collector A. The mixture C comprising 10% of the collector B according to the invention and 90% of the standard collector A also shows a significantly increased recovery compared with the standard collector A.
The flotation reagent according to the invention can be used in a wide pH range, for example 7 to 12, preferably 8 to 11, and is added to the aqueous pulp in a concentration between preferably 0.001 and 1.0 kg/ton of crude mineral.
Using the flotation reagent according to the invention, compared with the collectors of the prior art, a significant improvement of recovery and selectivity is achieved. Examples 1 to 10 show that the Fe recovery is significantly higher than with the corresponding standard reagent.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2006 010 939 | Mar 2006 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2007/001628 | 2/26/2007 | WO | 00 | 9/9/2008 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2007/101575 | 9/13/2007 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2389763 | Cahn | Nov 1945 | A |
| 3363758 | Cronberg et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3398197 | Miller et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
| 3459649 | Mueller et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
| 3834533 | McGuire et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 4070276 | Broman et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4168227 | Polgaire et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4235811 | Schulze et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4278533 | Hefner | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4287052 | Hefner et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4304690 | Schulze et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4319987 | Shaw et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4325821 | Escalera | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4830739 | Hellsten et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4900431 | Volpi et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4995965 | Mehaffey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4995998 | Von Rybinski et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5182039 | Miller et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5261539 | Hancock et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5439116 | Van Lierde et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5540336 | Schreck et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5540337 | Riggs et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5720873 | Klingberg et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 6076682 | Gustafsson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6617303 | Smith et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 20090152174 | Pedian et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 12 59 264 | Jan 1968 | DE |
| 26 01 068 | Jul 1976 | DE |
| 41 33 063 | Apr 1993 | DE |
| 38 78 440 | Sep 1993 | DE |
| 0 310 720 | Apr 1989 | EP |
| 1 469 430 | Feb 1966 | FR |
| 2 700 976 | Aug 1994 | FR |
| 1 343 957 | Jan 1974 | GB |
| 2 150 049 | Jun 1985 | GB |
| WO 9306935 | Apr 1993 | WO |
| WO 0062937 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090114573 A1 | May 2009 | US |
