Downhole system operators are always receptive to new methods and devices to permit actuation of tools located downhole within a downhole system. Increasing flow rates of fluid pumped from surface can and has been harnessed as a method to permit actuation of a number of different types of devices in the downhole environment. In such methods downhole actuators typically use reduced diameter elements that resist fluid flow resulting in actuation forces that are proportional to the flow rate. While these work well for their intended purpose, the reduced diameter elements can limit other operations simply due to diametrical patency. Commonly then such actuators must be removed from the downhole system to allow full bore access. Devices and methods that permit actuation based on flow while not incurring the drawback noted would be well received in the art.
Disclosed herein is a flow-actuated actuator. The actuator includes, a tubular movable relative to a structure within which the tubular is positionable, and a plurality of full bore flow-resisting elements disposed at the tubular, the plurality of full bore flow-resisting elements having a greater resistance to fluid flow therethrough than any one of the plurality of full bore flow-resisting elements has alone.
Further disclosed herein is a method of actuating a device. The method includes, positioning a tubular having a plurality of full bore flow-resisting elements within a structure, flowing fluid through the tubular, urging the tubular in a direction of fluid flow with flow resistance created by fluid flowing over the plurality of full bore flow-resisting elements, and actuating a device with the urging of the tubular.
Further disclosed herein is a flow-actuated actuator. The actuator includes, a tubular having a plurality of full bore flow-resisting features formed therein, the flow-actuated actuator is longitudinally movable relative to a structure within which the tubular is positionable, the plurality of full bore flow-resisting features creating a greater resistance to fluid flow therethrough than any one of the plurality of full bore flow-resisting features creates alone.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.
Referring to
The actuator 10 includes, a tubular 14, a movable member 18, a biasing member 22 and a flow resistor 24. The movable member 18 is movable between a first position 26 (shown in
In this embodiment, the movable member 18 has a plurality of first links 56 and a plurality of second links 58. The first links 56 are pivotally attached to the flow resistor 24 at a first pivot 62 on one end and pivotally attached to the second links 58 at a second pivot 64 at the other end. Similarly, the second links 58 are pivotally attached to the first links 56 at the second pivot 64 at one end and pivotally attached to the tubular 14 at a third pivot 66 at the other end. This construction allows the second pivot 64 to be moved radially inwardly to form the minimum dimension 40 in response to movement of the flow resistor 24 toward the tubular 14, with the biasing member 22 being compressed in the process.
A flow interacting detail 70 on the flow resistor 24, illustrated herein as an annular groove on an inner surface 74 of the flow resistor 24 interacts with the fluid flow to create an urging force on the flow resistor 24 that is proportional to the fluid flow. The interacting detail 70 (as the annular groove illustrates) can be formed without reducing the minimum dimension 34 of the flow resistor 24. Doing so allows full bore access to take place through the actuator 10, as mentioned above, without the need to remove the actuator 10 from the well bore. The biasing member 22 is selected to allow the flow resistor 24 to move relative to the tubular 14 with relatively little urging force applied to the flow resistor 24. Once the flow resistor 24 begins moving toward the tubular 14 the urging force on the flow resistor 24 quickly increases since the minimum dimension 32 begins reducing toward the minimum dimension 40 thereby reducing the flow area therethrough and increasing the pressure drop associated with the fluid flow.
The biasing element 50 is selected to have a greater biasing force on the tubular 14 than the biasing member 22 has on the flow resistor 24. This assures that the flow resistor 24 moves before the tubular 14 moves. In fact, the biasing element 50 can be selected such that the tubular 14 does not move unless the movable member 18 has been moved to the second position 28 wherein the forces generated by the flowing fluid are substantially greater due to the flow restriction created by the reduced flow area 44 formed by the movable member 18.
The biasing member 22 and the biasing element 50 are also selected to have sufficient biasing forces to reset both the flow resistor 24 and the tubular 14 to their original, non-flow actuated positions, as illustrated in
Referring to
In this embodiment, the movable member 118 has a plurality of orifice dogs 154 substantially oriented about a longitudinal axis of the tubular 114. The orifice dogs 154 are moved from the first position 126 to the second position 128 in response to longitudinal movement of the flow resistor 124. This longitudinal movement of the flow resistors 124 causes ramped extenders 158 thereon to engage ramped surfaces 162 on the orifice dogs 154 moving the orifice dogs 154 to the second position 128 against the biasing of the biasing members 122 to form the minimum dimension 140.
A plurality of flow-resisting elements 170 on the flow resistor 124, illustrated herein as annular grooves on an inner surface 174 of the flow resistor 124, interacts with the fluid flow to create an urging force on the flow resistor 124 that is proportional to the fluid flow. The annular groove flow-resisting elements 170, in this embodiment are formed without reducing the minimum dimension 134 of the flow resistor 124. Doing so allows full bore access through the actuator 110, as mentioned above, without the need to remove the actuator 110 from the well bore. A biasing member 178 is set to bias the flow resistor 124 against a direction of the fluid flow. A biasing force of the biasing member 178 is selected to permit the flow resistor 124 to move relative to the tubular 114 with relatively little urging force applied to the flow resistor 124. Once the flow resistor 124 begins moving toward the tubular 114 the urging force on the orifice dogs 154 generated by the fluid flow quickly increases since the minimum dimension 132 begins reducing toward the minimum dimension 140 thereby reducing the flow area therethrough and increasing the pressure drop associated with the fluid flow.
The biasing element 150 is selected to have a greater biasing force on the tubular 114 than the biasing member 178 has on the flow resistor 124. This assures that the flow resistor 124 moves before the tubular 114 moves. In fact, the biasing element 150 can be selected such that the tubular 114 does not move unless the movable member 118 has been moved to the second position 128 wherein the forces generated by the flowing fluid are substantially greater due to the flow restriction created by the reduced flow area 144 formed by the movable member 118.
The biasing member 122, the biasing element 150 and the biasing member 178 are also selected to have sufficient biasing forces to reset the orifice dogs 154, the tubular 114, and the flow resistor 124 to their original, non-flow actuated positions, as illustrated in solid lines in
Referring to
In this embodiment, the flow resistor 226 is a flow tube with a flapper 238 sealable to a downstream end 242. The flow resistor 226 is biased in an upstream direction by a biasing member 246 depicted here as a compression spring. A biasing member, such as a coil spring (not shown), for example, biases the flapper 238 toward the sealing position. The foregoing structure maintains the flow resistor 226 in an upstream orientation with the flapper 238 sealed thereto when fluid is not flowing. Flowing fluid acting upon the flow resistor 226 causes the flow resistor 226 to move downstream against the biasing forces to fully open the flapper 238.
In this embodiment, the flow resistor 226 has details specifically configured to increase urging force acting thereon by fluid flow. For example, angles of the walls 250, 254, 258 that define the flow-resisting elements 214 with respect to a longitudinal axis of the flow resistor 226 can be selected to increase interaction with the fluid. In this embodiment, the leading wall 250 is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, while the annular wall 254 is substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis and the trailing wall forms approximately a 45 degree angle with the longitudinal axis. The 45 degree angle forms a ramped surface 260. Alternate angles of all three walls 250, 254, 258 can be selected for specific applications and specific flow rates. Similarly, a longitudinal dimension 262 between any two adjacent flow-resisting elements 214 may be selected to optimize urging forces generated by fluid interacting with downstream flow-resisting element 214.
Referring to
Referring to
The flow-resisting elements 314 and 414 of actuators 310 and 410 respectively include details configured to cause turbulation of the fluid flowing thereby. For example, fluid turbulated by the first flow-resisting element 314A interacts with downstream flow-resisting elements 314B and 314C to create a greater urging force on the flow resistor 326 than would be created had the first flow-resisting element 314A not been present. Similarly, turbulence caused by the first flow-resisting element 314A and the second flow-resisting element 314B creates a greater urging force on the third flow-resisting element 314C than would be created had the second flow-resisting element 314B not been present. This cumulative effect builds upon whatever number of flow-resisting elements 314 and 414 are utilized.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3151839 | Mott | Oct 1964 | A |
3973586 | Hill et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4161219 | Pringle | Jul 1979 | A |
4215748 | Pace et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4274490 | Huckaby | Jun 1981 | A |
4362214 | Pringle et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4373587 | Pringle | Feb 1983 | A |
4601342 | Pringle | Jul 1986 | A |
4834183 | Vinzant et al. | May 1989 | A |
4856557 | Watson | Aug 1989 | A |
5004007 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5040606 | Hopper | Aug 1991 | A |
5050839 | Dickson et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5095994 | Dollison | Mar 1992 | A |
5179973 | Dickson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5310005 | Dollison | May 1994 | A |
5752569 | Bhavsar et al. | May 1998 | A |
6302210 | Crow et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6394187 | Dickson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6668935 | McLoughlin et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6877564 | Layton et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6902006 | Myerley et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7021386 | Vick, Jr. et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7137452 | McVicker | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7210498 | Arigoni | May 2007 | B2 |
7213653 | Vick, Jr. | May 2007 | B2 |
7270191 | Drummond et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7347270 | McMillan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7363980 | Pringle | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7409996 | Myerley et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7455115 | Loretz et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7575058 | Franco et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7690432 | Noske et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20010007284 | French et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030121665 | Trott et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20060070744 | Smith | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060124315 | Frazier et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060162939 | Vick, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070137869 | MacDougall et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070246225 | Hailey et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070295515 | Veneruso et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080164035 | Bolding et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080196898 | Jasser et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210438 | Bolding et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230231 | Bolding et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080245531 | Noske et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100294508 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |