The invention relates generally to a device for producing a uniform flow field from a highly distorted airflow with minimal pressure loss through the device.
A mass flow plug measurement device is commonly used in wind tunnel testing to measure the mass flow rate of air through various models to determine the aerodynamic properties of that model based on the position of the mass flow plug. However, highly distorted air flow entering the mass flow plug, as may be typical at the outlet of a wind tunnel model during actual testing, may distort the measured mass flow rate from the actual mass flow rate. Calibration of a mass flow plug occurs in a special calibration facility which provides uniform flow that is dissimilar to the airflow of actual testing in a wind tunnel with a model. A multi-probe total pressure rake and a ring of wall static pressure ports are conventionally used to account for the differences caused by the distorted airflow during actual testing. The multi-probe total pressure rake and wall static pressure ports may not be able to fully account for more extreme distorted air flow operating conditions of a model in the wind tunnel.
According to certain embodiments, a device for conditioning a flow of air includes a casing with an inlet and an outlet. The device has a flow conditioner disposed within the casing and concentrically aligned with the casing. The flow conditioner has a cylindrical portion and a domed end portion capping the cylindrical portion. The flow conditioner forms an annulus region between the flow conditioner and the casing. The flow conditioner also forms a mixing chamber interior to the flow conditioner. The flow conditioner also has a plurality of holes throughout the flow conditioner that are configured to permit air to flow from the inlet of the casing and the annulus into the mixing chamber. The device also has a flow straightener located at the outlet of the casing that is configured to straighten the airflow as it flows from the mixing chamber out of the device.
According to certain embodiments, an aerodynamics testing apparatus includes a wind tunnel inlet model, an airflow smoothing device, and a mass flow plug measurement device. The wind tunnel model has an inlet and an outlet that supplies a flow of air at the outlet. The airflow smoothing device includes a casing with an inlet and an outlet. The device has a flow conditioner disposed within the casing and concentrically aligned with the casing. The flow conditioner has a cylindrical portion and a domed end portion capping the cylindrical portion. The flow conditioner forms an annulus region between the flow conditioner and the casing. The flow conditioner also forms a mixing chamber interior to the flow conditioner. The flow conditioner also has a plurality of holes throughout the flow conditioner that are configured to permit air to flow from the inlet of the casing and the annulus into the mixing chamber. The device also has a flow straightener located at the outlet of the casing that is configured to straighten the airflow as it flows from the mixing chamber out of the device. The mass flow plug measurement device receives the smoothed airflow from the outlet of the casing.
According to certain embodiments, a device includes a casing and a flow conditioner. The casing has an inlet and an outlet and is configured to receive an airflow at the inlet and then output a smoothed airflow at the outlet. The flow conditioner is disposed within the casing and has a cylindrical portion with a first and a second end, a domed end portion proximate the inlet of the casing and that caps the first end of the cylindrical portion, a mixing chamber that is formed by interior portions of the cylindrical and domed end portions, and a plurality of apertures formed within the cylindrical and domed end portions that permit air to pass from the inlet into the mixing chamber.
Certain embodiments may provide one or more technical advantages. As an example, certain embodiments provide advantages for allowing mass flow plug calibration over the full operating range of the plug position enabling more accurate measurements during aerodynamics testing. As another example, certain embodiments provide advantages for enabling the mass flow plug calibration to be valid for a wide range of inlet model orientations and conditions (e.g., alpha, beta, Mach) that ordinarily cause flow distortion patterns to be discharged from the inlet model. Certain embodiments may include all, some, or none of the above-described advantages. Other advantages will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention. Descriptions of specific embodiments and applications are provided only as examples and various modifications will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. The general principles described herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail.
Highly distorted air flow is typically discharged from certain types of wind tunnel inlet models into a mass flow plug measurement device. This highly distorted flow field is not ideal when using a mass flow plug calibrated under uniform flow field conditions. As a result, the measured data when testing a model in a wind tunnel that results in a highly distorted flow field may be inaccurate or wholly invalid. The disclosed device to condition the flow field may result in more accurate measured data during wind tunnel testing. The disclosed device may also provide the advantage of enabling the mass flow plug calibration to be valid over the full operating range of plug positions. The resulting conditioned airflow at the outlet of the airflow smoothing device may improve the accuracy of aerodynamics test results.
After passing through airflow smoothing device 101, the flow of air will have a more uniform flow field as it reaches the mass flow measurement device 130. The advantage of this is to improve the reading from mass flow measurement device 130. Mass flow measurement devices, such as the one illustrated in
In some embodiments, flow conditioner 105 of flow smoothing device 101 is concentrically aligned with casing 102 and flow straightener 109. Flow conditioner 105 includes a domed end portion 105E and a cylindrical portion 105A. Cylindrical portion 105A may have a first end 115 and a second end 125, first end 115 located proximate to inlet 103 of casing 102 and second end 125 located proximate to outlet 104 of casing 102. Domed portion 105B is located at the first end 115 of cylindrical portion 105A. The interior cavity of the flow conditioner 105 defines a mixing chamber 108 enclosed by the interior walls of cylindrical portion 105A, domed end portion 105E and flow straightener 109. Flow conditioner 105 also forms an annulus region 107 between the exterior diameter of cylindrical portion 105A and the interior diameter of casing 102.
Flow conditioner 105 includes a plurality of holes 106 formed within cylindrical portion 105A and domed end portion 105B. Holes 106 may be any shape of aperture and may be any appropriate size and are not limited to round holes as illustrated. Holes 106 may also be any appropriate number of holes 106. In certain embodiments flow conditioner 105 has at least two hundred holes 106. Holes 106 may be configured to allow air to flow from inlet 103 of the casing 202 and annulus 107 into mixing chamber 108. Additional detail regarding the flow path of air within flow smoothing device 101 will be described in greater detail with respect to
After entering inlet 103 of casing 102, a portion of received airflow 110 may proceed to pass directly through holes 106 of domed end portion 105B and enter mixing chamber 108 as direct airflow 112. In certain embodiments, a minority portion of the received airflow 110 will pass through the holes 106 located about domed end portion 105B as direct airflow 112. Rather, the majority of the received airflow 110 may pass around the exterior of domed end portion 105B and enter annulus 107 as transverse airflow 114. This transverse airflow 114 may be considered separately as upper transverse airflow 114A and lower transverse airflow 144B. Highly distorted air flow 110 may generate a large disparity between upper transverse airflow 114A and lower transverse airflow 114B.
Both upper transverse airflow 114A and lower transverse airflow 114B that passes through the annulus will then be directed into mixing chamber 108 through holes 106 of cylindrical portion 105A. Because the holes 106 of cylindrical portion 105A are perpendicular to the concentric axis of casing 102 and flow conditioner 105, in some embodiments, the air entering the mixing chamber 108 from cylindrical portion 105A will result in a substantially perpendicular flow path with respect to a hypothetical flow path directly between inlet 103 to outlet 104 of casing 102. The airflow passing through holes 106 from upper transverse airflow 114A and lower transverse airflow 114B enters mixing chamber 108 as upper cross airflow 116A and lower cross airflow 116B, respectively.
Both upper cross airflow 116A and lower cross airflow 116B will impinge direct airflow 112 causing the air entering mixing chamber 108 to redistribute into a more uniform flow. It may also be appreciated that lower cross airflow 116B may have a higher velocity than upper cross airflow 116A resulting from the flow rate of lower transverse airflow 114B being greater than the flow rate of upper transverse airflow 114A. The cross airflows 116A and 116B are diametrically opposed and will interact with each other and redistribute more uniformly from top to bottom within mixing chamber 108 as a result of the difference in velocity at holes 106.
After redistributing more uniformly within mixing chamber 108, the air will pass through flow straightener 109. Flow straightener 109 will receive the uniformly distributed air within mixing chamber 108 and eliminate any remaining radial velocity component of the air as it exits the flow smoothing device 101 as smoothed discharge air 118. Flow straightener 109 is illustrated in
The diameter of holes 106 may be based on a size determined to best distribute the air entering mixing chamber 108. For example, holes 106 may have diameters between one-eighth of an inch to five thirty-seconds of an inch, however, any diameter may be used. In some embodiments, holes 106 may be equally sized. The sizing of holes 106 may also be determined so as to minimize the pressure loss across flow smoothing device 101. In certain embodiments, holes 106 may have a larger opening diameter than the diameter at the inside of flow conditioner 105 exposed to mixing chamber 108. For example, holes 106 may be chamfered at the opening to draw in air more easily and may not be chamfered at mixing chamber 108 side so that the air passing through holes 106 enter mixing chamber 108 as a jet.
Holes 106 may be distributed throughout flow straightener 105 in any pattern. In certain embodiments, holes 106 may be uniformly distributed throughout flow straightener 105. In some embodiments, holes 106 may be located such that the spacing between the holes 106 ranges from twice the diameter of holes 106 to 1.6 times the diameter of holes 106. In certain other embodiments, the distribution of holes 106 may favor cylindrical portion 105A to reduce the amount of direct airflow 112 entering mixing chamber 108 in relation to the amount of cross airflow 116A, 116B.
Herein, “or” is inclusive and not exclusive, unless expressly indicated otherwise or indicated otherwise by context. Therefore, herein, “A or B” means “A, B, or both,” unless expressly indicated otherwise or indicated otherwise by context. Moreover, “and” is both joint and several, unless expressly indicated otherwise or indicated otherwise by context. Therefore, herein, “A and B” means “A and B, jointly or severally,” unless expressly indicated otherwise or indicated otherwise by context.
Although the present disclosure includes several embodiments, a myriad of changes, variations, alterations, transformations, and modifications may be suggested to one skilled in the art, and it is intended that the present disclosure encompass such changes, variations, alterations, transformations, and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2123662 | Gwynne | Jul 1938 | A |
2491796 | Baume | Dec 1949 | A |
2805571 | Graham | Sep 1957 | A |
3109459 | Lee, II | Nov 1963 | A |
3602920 | Davis et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3747598 | Cowans | Jul 1973 | A |
3835703 | Bush | Sep 1974 | A |
4198220 | Keller | Apr 1980 | A |
5253517 | Molin | Oct 1993 | A |
5341848 | Laws | Aug 1994 | A |
5392815 | Stuart | Feb 1995 | A |
5495872 | Gallagher et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501101 | Purcell | Mar 1996 | A |
5762107 | Laws | Jun 1998 | A |
5874050 | Matias | Feb 1999 | A |
6145544 | Dutertre et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6694808 | Sawada et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7249614 | Vakili | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7762074 | Bland | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7992454 | Purdy et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8182702 | Al-Sannaa | May 2012 | B2 |
9114874 | Danto | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9625293 | Sawchuk | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9885375 | Reiss | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10378566 | Kumar | Aug 2019 | B2 |
20040069704 | Yamaguchi | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050205147 | Sawchuk | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080250854 | Ding | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090173405 | Denzler | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100044522 | Siercke et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110011478 | Chalupa et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110174408 | Lundberg | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120024985 | Johnson | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20140062232 | Cocks | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20160238046 | Reiss | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160334249 | Sawchuk | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20180050276 | Romanenko | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180266094 | Priester | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180306216 | Heizenroeder | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6014121 | Jan 1985 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200041375 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |