When well fluid is produced from a subterranean formation, the fluid typically contains particulates, or “sand.” The production of sand from the well typically is controlled for such purposes as preventing erosion and protecting upstream equipment. One way to control sand production is to install screens in the well. As an example, the sand screen may include a cylindrical mesh that is placed inside the borehole of the well where well fluid is produced. As another example, the sand screen may be formed by wrapping wire in a helical pattern with a controlled distance between each adjacent winding.
The sand screen may be part of a completion assembly to regulate the flow produced well fluid. In addition to one or multiple completion, the sand screen assembly may include a base pipe and one or more inflow control devices (ICDs) that regulate the flow of the produced well fluid into an interior space of the base pipe.
The summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In accordance with an example implementation, an apparatus that is usable with a well includes a housing and a body. The housing includes an inlet and an outlet, and a fluid flow is communicated between the inlet and outlet. The body disposed inside the housing to form a fluid restriction for the fluid flow. The body includes an opening therethrough to divert a first portion of the fluid flow into a first fluid flow path; and a first surface to at least partially define the first fluid flow path. The body is adapted to move to control fluid communication through the first flow path based at least in part on at least one fluid property of the flow.
In accordance with another example implementation, an apparatus includes a screen, a base pipe and a flow control device. The base pipe includes a central passageway and at least one port to communicate a fluid flow into the central passageway after passing through the screen. The flow control device regulates the fluid flow and includes a housing and a floating body that is disposed inside the housing. The housing has an inlet to receive the fluid flow and an outlet to provide the fluid flow. The body moves to form a fluid restriction for the fluid flow based at least in part on a fluid property of the fluid flow. The body includes an opening therethrough to divert a portion of the fluid flow into a diverted fluid flow path having a cross section that varies with movement of the body; and a surface to face away from the inlet to at least partially define the diverted fluid flow path.
In accordance with another example implementation, a technique that is usable with a well includes downhole in the well, communicating a fluid flow to a flow control device that contains a movable body to cause a first force to be exerted on the body; diverting at least part of the fluid flow through an opening of the body to a laminar flow channel to cause a second force that opposes the first force to be exerted on the body based on one or more fluid properties of the diverted fluid flow; and using movement of the body in response to the first and second forces to control a mixture of fluids entering a production tubing string.
In accordance with yet another example implementation, an apparatus that is usable with a well includes a base pipe that is concentric about a longitudinal axis and an inflow control device to regulate a flow into the base pipe. The inflow control device includes at least one arcuate body that is disposed outside the base pipe to form a fluid restriction for the fluid flow. The arcuate body includes an inner surface to at least partially define a fluid flow path, and the body is adapted to radially move with respect to the longitudinal axis to control fluid communication through the fluid flow path based at least in part on at least one fluid property of the flow.
Advantages and other features will become apparent from the following drawing, description and claims.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth but implementations may be practiced without these specific details. Well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail to avoid obscuring an understanding of this description. “An implementation,” “example implementation,” “various implementations” and the like indicate implementation(s) so described may include particular features, structures, or characteristics, but not every implementation necessarily includes the particular features, structures, or characteristics. Some implementations may have some, all, or none of the features described for other implementations. “First”, “second”, “third” and the like describe a common object and indicate different instances of like objects are being referred to. Such adjectives do not imply objects so described must be in a given sequence, either temporally, spatially, in ranking, or in any other manner. “Coupled” and “connected” and their derivatives are not synonyms. “Connected” may indicate elements are in direct physical or electrical contact with each other and “coupled” may indicate elements co-operate or interact with each other, but they may or may not be in direct physical or electrical contact. Also, while similar or same numbers may be used to designate same or similar parts in different figures, doing so does not mean all figures including similar or same numbers constitute a single or same implementation.
Referring to
As depicted in
For the following discussion, it is assumed that the string 20 receives produced well fluid and contains devices to regulate the mixture of produced fluids received into the string 20, although the concepts, systems and techniques that are disclosed herein may likewise be used for purposes of injection, in accordance with further implementations.
For the example implementation of
Referring to
In accordance with example implementations, the completion assembly 30 includes an annular barrier that contains one or multiple inflow control devices (ICDs) 150. As described herein, the ICD 150 contains a floating or movable body that moves in response to one or more fluid properties of the incoming fluid flow to regulate a mixture of the flow that is communicated into the string 20). More specifically, the ICD 150 enhances the flow of a desirable fluid (crude oil, for example), while inhibiting, or choking, the flows of undesirable fluids, such as gas or water.
For the example implementation shown in
For the example implementation that is depicted in
The sleeve 128 may be translated between its open (
It is noted that
The ICDs 150 are used to regulate production so that the producing reservoir is generally uniformly depleted. In this manner, during oil production, the pressure distribution inside the completion tubing may not uniform due to internal frictional losses in the tubing and varying flow rates at different sections of the tubing. Additionally, formation permeabilities, which affect the production rate, may significantly vary from zone to zone.
For example, for lateral, or horizontal, wells, which have a heel, a near, and a toe, a far end, the differential pressure and depletion rate may vary. For example, the heel section of the completion may have an associated higher differential pressure and an associated faster depletion rate relative to the toe section, thereby giving rise to the “heel-to-toe” effect. A change in the oil/water interface and/or an oil/gas interface, called “coning,” may lead to premature breakthrough of the “unwanted” fluids, such as gas or water.
Gas and water play important roles when left in place. In this manner, gas, due to its relatively higher compressibility, and hence, relatively higher stored energy, serves as a driver to displace oil in the formation. Water serves the roll of lifting the oil and is typically produced with the oil up to a 90% water cut. The production system may include measures to control water and gas production, as breakthrough of the gas means (due to its higher mobility) that the gas is primarily produced, which results in loss of the energy of the gas cap, which, in turn, reduces the “push” of the oil. The same principle applies to regulating the production of water, except that measures typically are used for purposes of inhibiting gas production in significant scale, whereas water production is controlled to a lesser degree.
Since water, due to its lower viscosity, and gases, due to both their lower viscosity and density, flow through the formation with lower resistance than oil, at some point, water and gases begin to dominate the volume fraction of the produced mixture, thereby putting additional burden on the above-ground separators and recycling systems. This may lead to premature abandonment of partially depleted reservoirs, leaving the majority of the oil near the completion unproduced, which, in turn, strongly affects well profitability.
In accordance with example systems and techniques that are disclosed herein, the ICD 150 has a single moving part, a body, which moves to adjust of the flow rate of a fluid flow based on one or more properties of the fluid, such as fluid viscosity and fluid density. For the specific example implementations that are described herein, the ICD 150 is used for proposes of controlling production. However, it is understood that a device similar to the ICD may be used to control injection, e.g. steam injection, gas injection, or water injection, in accordance with further, example implementations. Where the ICD's disclosed herein are used to control injection rather than production, any of the disclosed ICD's 150, 400, 500, 1200, etc. may be installed in completion screen assembly 30, base pipe, etc. such that fluids flowing from interior of the screen assembly 30 or base pipe to the formation 15 are controlled by the ICD. For example, the ICD may positioned in a reverse direction from the production arrangement such that injection fluids flowing from the interior of the screen assembly flow through the ICD's inlet and exit it's outlet before reaching the formation.
In accordance with example implementations, the ICD 150 is constructed to choke relatively low viscosity fluids, such as gas and water, and enhance the flow of relatively higher viscosity fluids, such as crude oil. In other words, in accordance with example implementations, the ICD 150 is constructed to reverse the natural tendency of fluids under pressure gradients to produce a higher flow rate for a low viscosity, low density fluid and produce a relatively low flow rate for higher viscosity, higher density fluids in porous media, such as formation rock, pipes and flow control nozzles.
The laminar flow regime of oil flow in porous rock of a reservoir may be described by the Darcy equation as follows:
where “ΔP” represents the pressure gradient vector; “μ” represents the dynamic fluid viscosity; “k” represents the formation permeability; “Q” represents the volumetric flow rate; and “A” represents the cross-sectional area of the flow path. As follows from Eq 1, the hydraulic resistance in a reservoir is linearly proportional to the fluid viscosity and is not a function of fluid density.
For a laminar flow in a two-dimensional (2-D) flow channel, a spatial pressure gradient
may be described as follows:
where “q” represents the volumetric rate per unit of channel width; and “h” represents the channel height. Similar to the porous media flow described above in Eq. 1, Eq. 2 indicates that the hydraulic resistance in a 2-D laminar channel is linearly proportional to the fluid viscosity and is not a function of fluid density. It is noted that in Eq. 2, the h channel height has a relatively strong effect on the pressure gradient, which is inversely proportional to the channel height cubed. The effect of the channel height, h, on the pressure gradient is used in the ICD 150, as further described herein.
For a flow through a conventional nozzle, which does not contain the movable body of the ICD 150, the differential pressure for relatively high Reynolds number flow is generally independent of fluid viscosity, as described below:
In Eq. 3, “KL” represents the nozzle loss coefficient; and “ρ” represents the fluid density. The viscosity represents the second order effect on the loss coefficient. Additionally, Eq. 3 indicates that pressure drop becomes becomes proportional to the fluid density and the flow rate squared.
For a conventional nozzle,
Turning to the more specific details, the movable body 420 contains a central opening 421 that circumscribes the axis 401 and receives the incoming flow 430. In particular, the body 420 includes a central hub 451 that has an axial bore that forms the opening 421. The body 420 further includes a flange 452 that radially outwardly extends from the hub 451. The radial flow channel 428 is formed between a downwardly facing surface 453 of the flange 452 (i.e., a surface opposed from the direction in which the flow 430 enters the ICD 150) and an upwardly facing surface 454 of a housing 419 of the ICD 150. For this example implementation, the hub 451 is sealed to the housing 419 by a corresponding fluid seal element 410 (an o-ring, for example). Due to this fluid seal, in an upper region 424 is created above the flange 452, which has a pressure that is generally the same as the pressure at the outlet(s) 429.
As can be seen from
More specifically, the pressure of the incoming fluid flow 430 exerts pressure on an upwardly facing surface 457 of the hub 451 to exert a corresponding downward acting force on the movable body 420, and the fluid flow in the radial flow channel 428 exerts pressure on the downwardly facing surface 453 of the flange 452 to exert a corresponding upward force on the movable body 420. The net force resulting from these upward and downwardly acting forces, in turn, controls the cross-sectional flow area of the radial flow channel 428 and thus, controls the extent of the fluid restriction that is imposed by the ICD 150. The movable body 420 may be considered floating in the sense that it moves independently from the housing 419, not necessary that it floats based on buoyancy.
For a given axial gap 428, a higher viscosity fluid in a laminar regime generally exhibits linearly proportional higher frictional losses in the radial flow channel 428, thereby correspondingly exhibiting a smaller entrance loss. Referring to
A relatively low viscosity fluid (such as water or gas) generates lower frictional losses along the radial flow channel 428 and correspondingly results in a relatively larger pressure drop at the inlet of the channel 428.
Referring to
Turning to the details, in accordance with example implementations, the movable body 520 includes a relatively larger lower flange 526 (a circular disk-shaped flange, for example), a central hub 525 and a relatively smaller upper flange 524 (a circular disk-shaped flange, for example). The upper 524 and lower 526 flanges each extends radially away from the hub 525, and the hub 525 circumscribes an axis 501 of the ICD 500 to form the central inlet, or opening 503, of the body 520. The flow 509 is directed radially inwardly under the upper flange 524 in a gap 504 that is formed between a downwardly facing surface 535 of the upper flange 524 and an upwardly facing surface 537 of the housing 520, axially along the hub 525 and radially outwardly between facing surface 539 of the lower flange 526 and a downwardly facing surface 529 of the housing 530. The radial flow channel 546 is formed between a downwardly facing surface 541 of the lower flange 526 and an upwardly facing surface 531 of the housing 530. The two flows 505 and 509 exit the ICD 500 at one or more outlets of the ICD 500 to form a discharge flow 540.
Fluid pressure acts on the upwardly facing surface 527 of the upper flange and on the upwardly facing surface 539 of the lower flange 526 to exert a downward force on the body 520; and fluid pressure acts on the lower surface 541 of the lower flange 526 (due to the radial flow channel 546) to exert an upward force on the body 520. More specifically, referring to
It is noted that, as compared to the ICD 150, the ICD 500 may provide the advantages of allowing additional increase of the total flow for high viscosity fluids; the simultaneous shut off of all flow passages for low viscosity fluids; and the elimination of a sealing element, which may degrade in performance over time.
Analytical models are described below for the single flow ICD 150 and for the double flow ICD 500. For these analytical models, the pressure drop across the ICD and the friction factor for the ICD are modeled.
First, for the ICD 150, a model 600 that is depicted in
In general, operation of the ICD may be described by the following set of equations. The force equilibrium of the floating body in the axial direction can be described as follows:
In Eq. 4 <ΔP2> is the area averaged pressure under the floating ring.
Energy balance equation along the flow from inlet to the outlet can be written as follows:
In Eq. 5, velocity at each cross section is defined from the mass conservation as follows:
Kentrance and Kexit in Eq. 5 represent non-dimensional entrance and exit loss coefficients, respectively; and p represents the fluid density. Parameter f in Eq. 5 represents the Darcy frictional factor. For the laminar flow regime, the friction factor may be derived analytically for a 2-D channel as a function of the Reynolds number, Re, as described below:
A 2-D passage may be related to the circular pipe flow using a hydraulic diameter, Dh, as follows:
where “A” represents the area; and “P” represents the perimeter of the cross-section. Hence, Reynolds number for a 2-D passage may be described as follows:
where “μ” represents the fluid dynamic viscosity.
As a flow turns turbulent, various empirical models that describe flow behavior may be used to model the flow, as can be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. In accordance with example implementations, a relatively simple non-iterative Blasius formula for turbulent flows in smooth pipes with Re<105 may be used, as described below:
Equations 4-10, if combined, form two equations with two unknowns, Q and h, which can be solved analytically or numerically to predict ICD performance analytically and to size the ICD for the given operating conditions.
For purposes of developing a model for the double flow ICD 500 (
As also shown in
Other implementations are contemplated, which are within the scope of the appended claims. For example, referring to
As another example,
Referring to
Unlike the single flow ICD discussed above, the ICD 1200 does not include a seal element between the body 1228 and the housing. Instead, the cap 1214 has a radial disk-shaped portion 1214-1 that circumscribes the inlet 1215 and a longitudinally extending portion 1214-2 that circumscribes the inlet 1215. The longitudinally extending portion 1214-2, as depicted in
As another variation, in accordance with some implementations, an ICD similar to the ICD 800 of
The lower housing 1322 contains an internal chamber 1370 that narrows at its end closest to the base pipe to form a discharge 1372 for the ICD 1310. The chamber 1370 receives a divider 1360 that contains outlets 1362, and the divider 1360 forms a region of the ICD 1310 that contains a floating, or moveable, body 1340. The body 1340 has a hub 1336 that circumscribes an axis along which the ICD 1310 receives an incoming flow at the ICD's inlet 1330; and the body 1340 contains a disk-shaped portion 1334 to form a flow channel between the portion 1334 and the divider 1360. Movement of the body 1340 along the axis regulates the flow through the ICD 1310, similar to the other ICDs described herein.
The body 1340 contains features that allow balancing of the forces that are acting on the body 1340. More specifically, in accordance with example implementations, the body 1340 contains an inset portion 1366 on the surface of the body 1340, which faces the divider 1360. The body 1340 may also, or alternatively, have a chamfer 1362 in the transition between the hub 1336 and the surface of the body 1340, which faces the divider 1360. In this manner, the ICD 1310 for the example implementation of
While a limited number of examples have been disclosed herein, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/186,997 filed Jun. 30, 2015, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/190,118 filed Jul. 8, 2015 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/190,129 filed Jul. 8, 2015. Each of the aforementioned related patent applications are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8485258 | Mathiesen et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8517099 | Mathiesen et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8534355 | Johannesen | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8590630 | Mathiesen et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8820413 | Mathiesen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8820414 | Mathiesen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8875797 | Aakre et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9038649 | Aakre et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9279309 | Werswick et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9366108 | Aakre et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9534470 | Aakre et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9624759 | Mathiesen et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20060027377 | Schoonderbeek et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070272408 | Zazovsky et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080217001 | Dybevik et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090078428 | Ali | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090218103 | Aakre | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20130180724 | Nguyen | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130277059 | Holderman | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150040990 | Mathiesen | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Aakre, H., et al “Smart Well with Autonomous Inflow Control Valve Technology,” SPE 164348, presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Exhibition, Manama, Bahrain, 2013, 8 pages. |
Fripp, M., et al, “The Theory of a Fluidic Diode Autonomous Inflow Control Device,” SPE 167415 presented at the SPE Middle East Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, UAE, 2013, 9 pages. |
Halvorsen, Martin, et al, “Increased oil production at Troll by autonomous inflow control with RCP valves”, SPE159634, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America, 2012, 16 pages. |
Least, B. et al “Autonomous ICD Single Phase Testing”, SPE 160165, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America, 2012, 9 pages. |
Least, B., et al “Inflow Control Devices Improve Production in Heavy Oil Wells,” SPE 167414, presented at the SPE Middle East Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, UAE, 2013, 11 pages. |
Mathiesen, V., et al “The Autonomous RCP Valve—New Technology for Inflow Control in Horizontal Wells”, SPE 145737, presented at the SPE Offshore Europe Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 2011, 10 pages. |
Moen, T. et al., “Inflow Control Device and Near-Wellbore Interaction,” SPE 112471, presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, United States of America, 2008, 8 pages. |
“ResFlow Well Production Management System,” retrieved from [http://www.slb.com/˜/media/Files/sand_control/product_sheets/resflow] retrieved Jan. 24, 2019, 4 pages. |
“Moody Chart” retrieved from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody_chart] last edited on Nov. 30, 2018, retrieved on Jan. 24, 2019, 3 pages. |
Munson, B. et al.,“Viscous Flow in Pipes,” Chapter 8, “Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, Second Edition,” 1994, p. 492, John Wiley. |
Edward, B. et al., “Production Transformation in Horizontal Wells' Oil Recovery and Revival in Shallow Volcanic Fractured Reservoir by ICD's OH Completions Success, Central Thailand,” SPE/IPTC 16872, International Petroleum Technology Conference, Mar. 26-28, 2013, 9 pages, Beijing, China. |
Tran, T. et al, “Attic Thin Oil Columns Horizontal Wells Optimization Through Advance Application of ICD's and Well Placement Technologies in South China,” IADC/SPE 126675, 2010 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Feb. 2-4, 2010, 20 pages, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/040229 dated Sep. 12, 2016, 17 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/040229 dated Jan. 2, 2018, 12 pages. |
Christopher E. Brennen, (1994) Radial and Rotordynamic Forces, Chapter 10, Hydrodynamics of Pumps (37 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170002625 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62186997 | Jun 2015 | US | |
62190118 | Jul 2015 | US | |
62190129 | Jul 2015 | US |