The invention relates generally to flow control devices that include permeable membranes.
A well (e.g., a vertical well, near-vertical well, deviated well, horizontal well, or multi-lateral well) can pass through various hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs or may extend through a single reservoir for a relatively long distance. A technique to increase the production of the well is to perforate the well in a number of different zones, either in the same hydrocarbon bearing reservoir or in different hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs.
An issue associated with producing from a well in multiple zones relates to the control of the flow of fluids into the well. In a well producing from a number of separate zones, in which one zone has a higher pressure than another zone, the higher pressure zone may produce into the lower pressure zone rather than to the surface. Similarly, in a horizontal well that extends through a single reservoir, zones near the “heel” of the well (closest to the vertical or near vertical part of the well) may begin to produce unwanted water or gas (referred to as water or gas coning) before those zones near the “toe” of the well (furthest away from the vertical or near vertical departure point). Production of unwanted water or gas in any one of these zones may require special interventions to be performed to stop production of the unwanted water or gas.
In other scenarios, certain zones of the well may have excessive drawdown pressures, which can lead to early erosion of the flow control devices or other problems.
To address coning effects or other issues noted above, flow control devices are placed into the well. There are various different types of flow control devices that have conventionally been used to equalize flow rates (or pressure drops) in different zones of a well. However, conventional flow control devices generally suffer from lack of flexibility and/or are relatively complex in design.
In general, according to an embodiment, a system for use in a well includes plural flow control devices to control fluid flow in respective zones of the well. Each of at least some of the flow control devices includes a membrane including a permeable material to provide fluid flow control. The membranes of the at least some flow control devices provide different permeabilities.
Other or alternative features will become apparent from the following description, from the drawings, and from the claims.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments are possible.
The different zones 110 correspond to different fluid flow zones, where fluid flow in each zone 110 is controlled by a respective flow control device 104.
In a production context, fluid flows from a surrounding reservoir (or reservoirs) into the wellbore 102, with the flow control devices 104 controlling the flow of such incoming fluids (which can be hydrocarbons) into the pipe 106. On the other hand, in the injection context, the flow control devices 104 control injection of fluid from inside the pipe 106 out towards the surrounding formation.
An issue associated with producing or injecting fluids in a well having multiple zones, such as the wellbore 102 depicted in
To control the production profile (by controlling the pressure drops and flow rates into the different zones 110 of the wellbore 102), the flow control devices 104 are provided. Note that water or gas coning is just one of the adverse effects that result from different pressure drops in different zones. Other adverse effects include excessive erosion of equipment in zones with larger pressure drops, the possibility of cave-in in a zone having a large pressure drop, and others.
Although reference is made to production of fluids, it is noted that flow control is also desirable in the injection context.
Each flow control device 104 in accordance with some embodiments has a membrane including a permeable material (this type of membrane is referred to as a “permeable membrane”) through which fluid flows between the inside and outside of the flow control device 104. The permeable membrane provides pressure drop and flow rate control between the inside and outside of the flow control device 104. To provide selective pressure drop and flow rate control through each flow control device 104, the permeable membranes associated with corresponding flow control devices in the plural zones are selected to provide different flow restrictions. Flow restrictions through the permeable membranes are controlled by selecting permeabilities for the permeable membranes such that a desired production profile or injection profile (more generally a “flow profile”) can be achieved along the wellbore 102. Effectively, the permeable membranes associated with different flow control devices have variable permeabilities across the different zones to achieve corresponding target flow restrictions. The permeability of each permeable membrane can be set at the factory or other assembly location.
Each flow control device 104A, 104B further includes a respective permeable membrane 208A, 208B that has a permeable material. The flow control devices 104A, 104B have permeable membranes 208A, 208B selected to have different permeabilities to provide variable flow restrictions along the length of the tubing string that includes the flow control devices 104A, 104B. The permeable membrane 208A of the flow control device 104A has a lower permeability than the permeable membrane 208B of the flow control device 104B. A membrane having a lower permeability provides a greater restriction to fluid flow, and thus increases the pressure drop for fluid flow across the permeable membrane.
As depicted in
In alternative embodiments, the screens 210A, 210B, gravel layers 212A, 212B, and outer shrouds 214A, 214B can be omitted.
Examples of permeable membranes 208A, 208B that can be used in the flow control devices according to some embodiments include meshes (formed by an arrangement of interlocking or woven links whose permeability can be adjusted based on adjusting a number of openings per defined area), porous layers (having pores whose density can be varied to provide different permeabilities), and sintered materials (whose permeabilities are controlled by how tightly packed the sintered materials are).
In some embodiments, each permeable membrane 208A, 208B can also optionally include swellable particles that expand in the presence of water (or some other activating fluid). Swelling of the swellable particles causes the membrane to close any interstitial volumes; consequently, swelling of the swellable particles blocks intrusion of any undesirable fluids from flowing through the flow control device. In one example implementation, the swellable material in the permeable membrane shuts off the flow control device in the presence of water, which can occur as a result of water coning (production of unwanted water).
Examples of materials that swell in the presence of an activating fluid include the following: BACEL hard foam or a hydrogel polymer. In one implementation, the swellable material is not substantially affected by exposure to hydrocarbon fluids, so the material can be located in specific regions (such as zones near the heel of the wellbore) susceptible to detrimental incursion of water migration that can interfere with production of hydrocarbon fluids.
In an alternative embodiment, as depicted in
Each second permeable membrane 302A, 302B in each flow control device includes swellable particles, as discussed above, where the swellable particles expand in the presence of an activating fluid, such as water. Thus, in any zone in which an unwanted fluid, such as water, is present, the second membrane 304 acts as a shut-off valve to prevent further intrusion of water into the production conduit.
In the embodiment of
Instead of providing two membranes 208 and 302 (one membrane formed of a swellable material and another membrane formed of a non-swellable material) in each flow control device, each flow control device can alternatively include a single membrane that includes both swellable and non-swellable materials, with the permeability of the single membrane set to a target permeability for a corresponding zone. In other implementations, swellable particles are not included in the permeable membrane.
While the invention has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 11/314,839, filed Dec. 21, 2005, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/593,206, filed Dec. 21, 2004, both hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2837032 | Horsting, Sr. | Jun 1958 | A |
5269376 | Gadelle et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5307984 | Nagaoka et al. | May 1994 | A |
5355953 | Shy | Oct 1994 | A |
5435393 | Brekke | Jul 1995 | A |
5730223 | Restarick | Mar 1998 | A |
5803179 | Echols | Sep 1998 | A |
5881809 | Gillespie | Mar 1999 | A |
5896928 | Coon | Apr 1999 | A |
5906238 | Carmody et al. | May 1999 | A |
6112815 | Boe | Sep 2000 | A |
6112817 | Voll | Sep 2000 | A |
6276458 | Malone et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6343651 | Bixenman | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6371210 | Bode | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6505682 | Brockman | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6533038 | Venning et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6622794 | Zisk, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6644412 | Bode | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6672385 | Kilaas et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6745843 | Johnson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6786285 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6851560 | Reig | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857475 | Johnson | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857575 | Mathias et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6883613 | Bode | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899176 | Hailey, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7407007 | Tibbles | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413022 | Broome et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20020075110 | Shimizu | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030023185 | Mertelmeier | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030066651 | Johnson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040018839 | Andric | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050126776 | Russell | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050173130 | Richard | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060185849 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090008092 | Haeberle et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 588 421 | Sep 1993 | EP |
WO 02075110 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 03023185 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2004018839 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004113671 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070131434 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60593206 | Dec 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11314839 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | 11643226 | US |