This disclosure relates to regulating the flow of water draining from or otherwise discharged from a natural or man-made stormwater storage area such as a stormwater retention basin, sedimentation pond or sedimentation basin, or the like.
Stormwater retention basins store water accumulated during a rain event and release the water at a controlled rate to prevent or limit downstream flooding and/or limit downstream waterway erosion.
Sedimentation ponds and sedimentation basins (hereinafter referred to as sedimentation basins) are designed to trap stormwater sediment within the boundaries of a property and prevent the sediment from flowing into downstream waterways. However, sedimentation basins are also often also used to meter the flow of stormwater to downstream waterways, thereby reducing the potential for flooding and downstream erosion.
Some basins have a discharge opening or orifice with a fixed cross sectional flow area located near the bottom of the basin. As the water level in the basin increases during a storm event, the rate of water discharged from the basin (which is essentially proportional to the square root of the water depth) increases with water level. Because the basin may fill quickly during a storm event, water is discharged from the basin at a maximum rate when the basin is at its most full condition (which is normally soon after the storm event has occurred).
Stormwater events often cause downstream flooding and also scour sediment from the bottom and sides of waterways. The greater the flow of water, the worse the problem becomes downstream. Site development, which tends to include impermeable surfaces such as parking lots, roofs, and the like, normally acts to increase the rate of site discharge and contributes to downstream flooding and erosion problems.
Typically, all of the sources of stormwater for a given waterway are discharging at their maximum rates during or shortly after a rain event. These sources include underground and aboveground stormwater storage systems, conventional stormwater collection systems, and also overland flows (sheet flows). Given that site development increases the potential for downstream flooding and stormwater volume related problems, it is often advantageous to postpone or delay the onset of the maximum rate of discharge from a basin after the storm event, or to limit the maximum rate of discharge from the basin after a storm event.
Faircloth, Jr. U.S. Pat. No. 5,820,751 discloses a device that maintains a drain inlet orifice at a constant distance below the water surface of a basin despite raising or lowering of the water level in the basin. Because the inlet orifice is maintained at a constant distance below the surface, the water flows into the orifice at essentially a constant flow rate that is also essentially independent of the basin's water level. Even after the basin fills with water during a storm event, water discharges at that constant flow rate. This can be advantageous because it eliminates the early peak flows from the basin and protects downstream waterways from those peaks. This is especially important in that the peak flows from the various sources which contribute to the flow of a given waterway normally are all releasing at their maximum rate at the same time.
Even with a constant flow device controlling one or more sources, downstream waterways will still be subjected to maximal flows from sources that are not volume/rate controlled. These sources may include conventional stormwater collection systems and normal flows across natural surfaces leading to the streams and rivers.
There is a need, therefore, to delay the peak flows from a basin until preferably well after the rain event. The basin would preferably release water at a relatively lower rate early in a storm event near the start of the basin discharge period, and would discharge a relatively higher rate (including the maximum rate) more towards the end of the basin discharge period.
Disclosed are embodiments of a method for delaying the peak flows from a stormwater storage area until preferably well after the rain event, and of a device for carrying out the method.
An embodiment of a method for regulating the discharge of water from a stormwater storage area having a waterline defining the depth of stormwater in the storage area from an initial first water depth to a lower, second water depth includes positioning an intake opening configured to receive water to be discharged from the storage area below the waterline and in communication with the water in the storage area when the water depth is the first water depth. The intake opening is positioned a first vertical distance below the waterline.
The intake opening is repositioned relative to the waterline as the water level in the storage area falls from the first water depth to the second water depth, with the vertical distance of the intake opening from the waterline varying inversely with water depth, as the intake pipe pivots with respect to the outlet pipe through an angle which may exceed 45 degrees.
The distance of the intake opening below the waterline is inversely related to water depth. The intake opening is located relatively nearest to the water line when the water depth is high, and moves further and further away from the water line as the water depth decreases. As the water level decreases from the first level to the second level, the hydraulic head above the intake opening increases, increasing the discharge rate in inverse relation to water depth. The discharge rate is lowest when the water level is at the first level and the maximum discharge rate is delayed until the water level has fallen to the second level.
A disclosed embodiment of a flow control device includes a inlet orifice that receives water into the flow control device and a vertical displacement system adapted to reposition the inlet orifice a distance below the waterline in inverse relationship to the water depth.
In a preferred embodiment of the flow control device, the inlet orifice is formed as an open end of an intake pipe. The vertical displacement system includes a pivotal connection between the other end of the intake pipe and an outlet pipe. A float attached to the intake pipe floats in the water and causes the intake pipe to pivot with respect to the outlet pipe with changes in water depth.
The float is connected to an attachment location of the inlet pipe, the attachment location spaced away from the intake opening. Pivotal movement of the intake pipe causes the vertical distance between the intake opening and the waterline to vary inversely with water depth.
The flow control device can be attached to a horizontal outlet pipe. The intake pipe may pivot 45 degrees with respect to the horizontal from a raised position when the water depth is the first water depth to a horizontal position parallel with the outlet pipe when the water depth has fallen to the second water depth.
Other objects and features of the disclosure will become apparent as the description proceeds, especially when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing sheets.
A method for regulating the discharge of water from a stormwater storage area having a waterline defining the depth of the storage area from an initial first water depth includes changing the hydraulic head of an intake opening below the waterline that receives the water to be discharged inversely with changes in water depth while the water level decreases to a lower second water depth. As the water depth decreases, the distance of the intake opening below the water line increases, thereby increasing the hydraulic head at the intake opening.
The increase in hydraulic head increases the rate of discharge inversely with the water depth. The maximum rate of discharge occurs when the water level reaches the lower, second water depth—thereby delaying the maximum discharge from the stormwater storage area until after a rain event has filled the storage area to the first water level.
The illustrated inlet orifice 18 is formed by the open free end of the intake pipe 16. The illustrated intake pipe 16 is a straight length of pipe that extends from the free end 18 to a lower pipe end pivotally connected to a pivot connection 20 of the device 10 that interconnects the outlet pipe 12 and the intake pipe 16.
In other possible embodiments, the inlet orifice 18 could be a different diameter than the intake pipe 16. For example, the inlet orifice 18 could have a smaller diameter to form a flow restriction that reduces the rate of flow into the intake pipe to allow for a longer drawdown period.
The pivot connection 20 allows the intake pipe 16 to pivot (that is, to angularly displace) with respect to the fixed outlet pipe 12. The illustrated intake pipe 16 can pivot with respect to the outlet pipe 12 between a first, horizontal position in which the intake pipe 16 is substantially parallel with the outlet pipe 12 to a second position shown in
The intake pipe 16 has a length L represented by the line dimension 24. Spaced along the intake pipe 16 a distance l represented by the line dimension 26 away from the inlet orifice 18 is a reference point 28 represented by the enlarged point 28 shown in
The waterline 14 shown in
When the water depth 14 is at its maximum and the intake pipe angle •=45 degrees, the inlet orifice 18 is spaced a first distance HMIN below the waterline 14. When the water depth 34 drops to P and the intake pipe angle •=0 degrees, the inlet orifice 18 is spaced a second distance HMAX below the waterline 14. As can be seen in
Inspection of
H=P−l sin •
and so for the illustrated flow control device 10:
HMIN=P−l sin(45 degrees), and
HMAX=P
The intake pipe angle • is a function of water depth for the water depth greater than or equal to P:
D−P=(L−l)sin •
and so
H=P−l(D−P)/(L−l)
or
H=P−k(D−P),k=l/(L−l)
The above equations can be used to calculate different embodiments of the flow control device 10 (and including different inlet orifice sizes). The change in hydraulic head H is a function of P, l, and •. The length L of the intake pipe 16 is selected to obtain the desired intake pipe angle • when the water depth is at a maximum.
The discharge rate of the flow control device 10 is lower than the fixed bottom orifice approximately the first half of the designed drawdown period. The difference in area between the two hydrographs 36, 38 while the hydrograph 36 is below the hydrograph 38 depicts the volume of water that is retained in the basin with the flow control device 10 as compared to the pond with the fixed bottom orifice. The water that is retained by the use of the flow control device 10 during the initial portion of the rain event that would have been discharged from the fixed bottom orifice no longer adds to the problems associated with large downstream waterway flows during the initial portion of the storm event drainage cycle.
After about the midpoint in the drawdown period, the hydrograph 36 is above the hydrograph 38, that is, the flow control device 10 is discharging more water than the fixed bottom orifice. This increased discharge rate of the flow control device 10, however, occurs at a time when all of the conventional sources of downstream water have peaked and are on the decline. Therefore the flow control device 10 helps even out the flow of downstream stormwater and protects the downstream waterways from the peak flows that are so harmful in terms of flooding and streambank and bottom erosion.
The illustrated flow control device 10 is designed to release the same volume of water from the sedimentation basin over the same period of time as the fixed bottom orifice. Because the flow control device 10 acts to delay the maximum discharge of water from the basin, a volume of water is retained on average for a longer period of time in the settlement pond as compared to the pond the fixed bottom orifice. This enables more solids to settle to the bottom of the pond using the flow control device 10 as compared to the fixed bottom orifice. The water discharged from the sedimentation pond with the flow control device 10 has higher water quality than the water discharged from the pond with the fixed bottom orifice.
In addition, since the water level for a basin with the flow control device 10 drops more slowly in the approximately first half of the drawdown period, the hydraulic head on the bottom of the basin is greater on average through the whole drawdown cycle utilizing the device 10 as compared to a fixed bottom orifice. Furthermore, the sidewalls of the basin will remain underwater for a longer period of time utilizing the device 10 as compared to a fixed bottom orifice. Greater hydraulic head on the bottom surface of the basin and a larger average area of exposed basin sidewalls combines for an additional benefit—a larger quantity of water will infiltrate into the soil rather than being discharged into downstream waterways.
The discharge rate of the flow control device 10 is lower than the fixed orifice depth outlet for again approximately the first half of the designed drawdown period, the difference in area between the two hydrographs 36, 40 while the hydrograph 36 is below the hydrograph 40 depicting volume of water that is retained in the basin that would have otherwise been discharged by the fixed orifice depth outlet. The flow control device 10 offers the same advantages of delayed discharge and higher water quality of the discharged water over the fixed orifice depth outlet as it does over the fixed bottom orifice.
The pivot connection 20 is formed as a flexible pipe assembly 112 that enables the inlet pipe 16 to pivot or angularly displace with respect to the outlet pipe. The flexible pipe assembly 112 includes a coupler 114 at one end of the assembly 112, an adaptor 116 at the other end of the assembly 112, and a flexible fluid line 118 extending between the coupler 114 and the adaptor 116.
The illustrated adaptor 116 is a flexible coupling for coupling the hose assembly 112 to the intake end of an outlet pipe such as the outlet pipe 12. The illustrated flexible fluid line 118 is a length of flexible hose.
The mounting structure 31 includes a float body 120 that is pivotally connected to the intake pipe 16 by a hanger assembly 122.
The float body 120 includes a pair of like side-by-side elongated pontoons 124 filled with marine grade foam. The ends of the pontoons 124 are connected together by a pair of end plates 126, 128 formed from plate or sheet material. Each end plate 126, 128 has a clearance opening 130 that provides clearance for the intake pipe 16 to pivot to the horizontal position. A pair of parallel ribs 132 extends between the end plates 126, 128 and between the pontoons 124. The inlet pipe 16 is closely received between the ribs 132 as best seen in
When the flow control device 110 is in use, the float body 120 floats in the water along a waterline 136 with respect to the float body. The waterline 136 defines a horizontal plane through the float body 120 (that is, the waterline 136 is even with the waterline 14 when the flow control device 110 is floating in the water). A vent tube 138 attached to the float body 120 has a lower end fluidly connected to the intake pipe 16 and an open upper end located above the waterline 136 to prevent the intake pipe 16 from becoming air locked.
The hanger assembly 122 includes a rigid elongated member formed as a hanger bolt 140 that is supported by the ribs 132 and is perpendicular to the pipe axis of the intake pipe 16. Pivotally mounted to the hanger bolt 140 is a “U”-shaped yoke 142 that receives and supports the intake pipe 16. The hanger bolt 140 connects the hanger assembly 122 to the float body 120 while the yoke 142 connects the hanger assembly 122 to the intake pipe 16.
The hanger bolt 140 and the yoke 142 are positioned to define the distance l (represented by the line dimension 26 in
As can be seen in
To further resist clogging, the inlet orifice 18 is optionally covered by a cover having intake openings. The illustrated inlet orifice 18 is shown with a cover formed as a grate or strainer 146 (see
The illustrated flow control device 110 is shown connected to a horizontal outlet pipe 12 located essentially at the bottom of the basin. In other embodiments the device 10 or device 110 can be used with a horizontal outlet pipe spaced above the bottom of the basin (for a “wet” basin). A raised pad or support structure may extend from the bottom of the basin to support the float body 120 when the basin waterline reaches the outlet pipe. The pad prevents further displacement of the float body 120 if the basin water level drops even further due to evaporation or basin maintenance.
In yet other embodiments of the device 10 or device 110, the device can be connected to a vertical outlet pipe (or an outlet pipe having a vertical component).
The intake pipe 16 of the flow control device 110 is formed from three sections: an upper pipe section 148 that is designed to be received in the yoke 142, a lower pipe section 150 that connects to the coupler 114, and a coupler 152 coupling the pipe sections 148, 150. This construction enables the upper pipe section 148 to be a standard length for a number of different flow control devices 110, and the length of the lower pipe section 150 varying as needed to form an intake pipe 16 having the desired design length L.
While this disclosure includes one or more illustrative embodiments described in detail, it is understood that the one or more embodiments are each capable of modification and that the scope of this disclosure is not limited to the precise details set forth herein but include such modifications that would be obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the relevant art, as well as such changes and alterations that fall within the purview of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
306523 | Read | Oct 1884 | A |
403919 | Prince et al. | May 1889 | A |
706526 | Carlisle | Aug 1902 | A |
716483 | Ryan | Dec 1902 | A |
1579917 | Deming | Apr 1926 | A |
2858843 | Muller | Nov 1958 | A |
3498465 | Fechter | Mar 1970 | A |
3633218 | Lekberg | Jan 1972 | A |
3702134 | Henning, Jr. et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3757953 | Sky-Eagle, Jr. | Sep 1973 | A |
3928202 | Raubenheimer | Dec 1975 | A |
4015629 | Morgan et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4179379 | Mitchell | Dec 1979 | A |
4224156 | Pardikes et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4290887 | Brown | Sep 1981 | A |
4305426 | Scheid | Dec 1981 | A |
4431536 | Thompson | Feb 1984 | A |
4647374 | Ziaylek | Mar 1987 | A |
4648967 | Calltharp | Mar 1987 | A |
4693821 | Goronszy | Sep 1987 | A |
4865734 | Schulz | Sep 1989 | A |
4956100 | Mikkleson | Sep 1990 | A |
5004536 | Geisler | Apr 1991 | A |
5021161 | Calltharp | Jun 1991 | A |
5036882 | Norcross | Aug 1991 | A |
5052855 | Chapman | Oct 1991 | A |
5113889 | McGuire, Jr. | May 1992 | A |
5232307 | Nouri | Aug 1993 | A |
5279728 | Weiss | Jan 1994 | A |
5290434 | Richard | Mar 1994 | A |
5358644 | Dennis | Oct 1994 | A |
5421995 | Norcross | Jun 1995 | A |
5820751 | Faircloth, Jr. | Oct 1998 | A |
6383389 | Pilgram | May 2002 | B1 |
6406617 | Brauchli | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6488841 | Glasgow | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6997644 | Fleeger | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7052206 | Mastromonaco | May 2006 | B1 |
7125200 | Fulton | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7341670 | Ghalib | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344644 | Haudenschild | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7459090 | Collings | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7762741 | Moody | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7790023 | Mills | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7794589 | Kozey | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7871516 | Hoefken | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7985035 | Moody | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8021543 | Ghalib | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8043026 | Moody | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8871202 | Sabbadini | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9051701 | Westcott | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20010013489 | Williamson | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20040168967 | Thompson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20090236278 | Hoefken | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100065508 | Bolan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100284746 | Moody | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110176869 | Moody | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
56089615 | Jul 1981 | JP |
59233010 | Dec 1984 | JP |
603314 | Jan 1985 | JP |
Entry |
---|
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Translation of Water Intake Device for JP59233010A, Dec. 2015, All pages. |
English-language translation of specification and claims of JP 603314 (3 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61709484 | Oct 2012 | US | |
61724033 | Nov 2012 | US |