Flow control valve for continuous discharge centrifugal concentrators

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6796934
  • Patent Number
    6,796,934
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 27, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 28, 2004
    19 years ago
Abstract
Prior continuous discharge centrifugal concentrators for separating higher density particles from a slurry have used pinch valves to control the flow of discharge. Such pinch valves tend to be blocked by coarse particles, requiring shutdown of the machine. The present invention provides a muscle-type valve to provide a circular orifice for the valve bore of continuously variable perimeter.
Description




The present invention relates to centrifugal concentrators of the rotating bowl type and other enhanced gravity machines for the separation of solids of higher density such as gold, iron or tin from a slurry containing solids of a lower density and liquid and more particularly such machines in which the target concentrate is continuously discharged.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Various centrifugal concentrators and other enhanced gravity machines are known which separate particles of high density such as gold, iron or tin from tailings and other slurry streams in a manner whereby the concentrate is discharged continuously rather than in a batch process requiring periodic shutdown of the machine. Generally such concentrators have utilized pinch valves or fixed orifice spigots to control the release of the concentrate from the rotating machine. For example, the present inventor's continuous discharge centrifugal concentrator which is the subject of U.S. Pat. No. 5,462,513 issued 31 Oct. 1995 utilizes flow control valves to control the discharge of concentrate which are air controlled mini pinch valves constructed with sleeves of the type manufactured by Linatex Inc. Each mini pinch valve has a central bore in which is positioned the flexible cylindrical sleeve of abrasion resistant material. By applying air pressure to the exterior surface of the sleeve, the sleeve is compressed and closes off the central bore, preventing the passage of concentrate. When air pressure to the valve is reduced the sleeve opens and material may flow through the valve. Another continuous discharge separator is disclosed in Knelson U.S. Pat. No. 5,338,284 issued Aug. 16, 1994. That device similarly utilizes a standard pinch valve to control the flow of discharged concentrate. Similarly, in the continuous discharge separator disclosed in Knelson U.S. Pat. No. 5,601,523 issued Feb. 11, 1997, pinch valves are used to control the flow of discharged concentrate.




The use of standard pinch valves to control discharge of concentrate from enhanced gravity machines carries with it a number of problems. In a pinch valve, the circular sleeve is typically compressed between two planes, causing the cross-section shape of the sleeve to be flattened, without reducing the circumference of the orifice. When the opening in the valve is reduced to reduce flow, the flattened cross-section thus created tends to trap coarse particles which can quickly cause the passage to become blocked, and can only be dislodged by fully opening the valves. Also, the sleeves are more easily torn by coarse particles when stretched and under tension. Alternatively, the valve can be operated in an on/off mode. This creates more problems. First, if this technique is to be effective, the valve needs to be cycled very rapidly, which causes failure after a few hundred hours of operation. Second, on/off cycling creates discrete bursts which may allow valuable material to bypass and cause barren material to be captured.




Other types of concentrators which provide a continuous discharge of concentrated fractions through small spigots having fixed orifices are the “Kelsey jig” disclosed in Kelsey U.S. Pat. No. 4,454,041 issued Jun. 12, 1984, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,898,666 issued Feb. 6, 1990; and the “Campbell jig” disclosed in Campbell U.S. Pat. No. 4,279,741 issued Jul. 21, 1981, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,998,986 issued Feb. 6, 1990. In such machines, is desirable to minimize the amount of water flowing out the concentrate discharge by minimizing the diameter of the spigot orifice. However this leads to blockage of the orifice by coarse particles, which causes imbalance in the rotor and requires shut-down of the machine.




Flow control valves of the type called “radially constrictible unobstructed venturi valves” have been used in the past in pipelines. A particular type of these valves, called “muscle valves” have been developed by The Clarkson Company of Reno, Nevada for use as low-pressure throttling control valve in pipeline systems. The basic design of such flow control valves is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,090,591 issued May 21, 1963. Such valves have not previously been used in rotating systems or gravity enhanced concentrators where high pressures are encountered. Unlike pinch valves, they utilize a “muscle”—a rubber part which uniformly constricts the sleeve so that as the sleeve diameter is reduced it maintains a circular cross-section.




There is therefore a need for a continuous discharge centrifugal concentrator having flow control valves which have the advantages of “muscle valves”.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides, in an enhanced gravity machine for separating particulate material of higher specific gravity from particulate material of lower specific gravity, comprising a) a rotating member adapted for rotation about an axis, (b) material supply means to deliver the particulate material into the rotating member, c) a plurality of cavities extending outwardly with respect to the axis of rotation of the rotating member, the cavities each having an outlet, and d) flow controlling means for controlling the flow of material from the outlets of the cavities; the improvement wherein the flow control valves are adapted to provide an orifice of continuously variable perimeter over a substantial range of operating cross-sectional areas.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




In drawings which illustrate a preferred embodiment of the invention:





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a centrifuge incorporating the invention;





FIG. 2

is a vertical cross-sectional view of the centrifuge shown in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a perspective cut-away view of the flow control valve of the invention;





FIG. 4

is an exploded perspective cut-away view of the flow control valve of the invention;





FIG. 5

is an end view of the flow control valve shown in

FIG. 3

;





FIG. 6

is a cross-sectional view of the flow control valve shown in

FIG. 5

taken along lines


6





6


;





FIG. 7

is a cross-sectional view of the flow control valve shown in

FIG. 5

taken along lines


7





7


;





FIG. 8

is an end view of the valve sleeve;





FIG. 9

is a cross-sectional view of the valve sleeve shown in

FIG. 8

taken along lines


9





9


;





FIG. 10

is an end view of the valve muscle;





FIG. 11

is a cross-sectional view of the valve muscle shown in

FIG. 10

taken along lines


11





11


; and





FIG. 12

is a chart comparing the size of particle which can pass through the valve of the present invention at a given flow constriction, to that of a conventional pinch valve.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




With reference to

FIGS. 1 and 2

, the inventor's centrifuge as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,462,513, which is incorporated herein by reference, and incorporating the present invention is designated by reference numeral


1


. It has a frame


3


, a shroud


4


consisting of shroud lid


5


and tailings launder


14


, and drive motor


9


. The frame is constructed of hollow steel sections. The shroud lid


5


has openings for a slurry feed pipe


18


and inspection ports


17


and an inner lining


32


of a wear resistant material such as LINATEX™. The flange of shroud lid


5


is bolted to an upper flange of tailings launder


14


. Tailings launder


14


is provided with a tailings discharge port


19


. Nested in tailings launder


14


is a concentrate launder


16


with a concentrate discharge port


20


. The floors


22


and


24


respectively of launders


14


and


16


form helical spirals downwardly to assist in a smooth outward flow of the discharge and are preferably coated with an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Water may be introduced at ports


26


to further assist the flow in the launder. The upper section of the tailings launder, where it forms the outer wall of the concentrate launder adjacent the output of flow control valves


37


, is also provided with an inner lining


32


of a wear resistant material such as LINATEX™. The upper outside edge


7


of concentrate launder


16


extends into a circular slot


11


formed on the inner wall of tailings launder


14


, forming a labyrinth barrier between the two launders.




Rotor


21


has an inner surface of rotor bowl


23


forming three zones: a migration zone, a retention zone and a lip zone, zones A, B and C respectively as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,824,431, which is incorporated herein by reference, which cause the denser, target particles from the slurry flow to be concentrated in the retention zone. The rotor


21


is mounted in the frame


3


by assemblies


25


. The rotor has a sheave


27


which is driven by a belt (not shown) driven by electric motor


9


. The rotor is provided with hopper rings


35


and flow control valves


37


, which will be described in further detail below. An impeller


28


is provided on the center of the floor of bowl


23


which has three or four upstanding vanes to assist in the rotation of the slurry. A continuous ½-inch slot


55


is formed in the surface of the retention zone B between the lower edge of the inner surface of lip


31


and the upper edge of the inner surface of lower bowl


30


. Slot


55


opens to a series of mass-flow hoppers formed between two polyurethane hopper rings which hoppers in turn open to the flow control valves


37


.




Rotor bowl


23


is formed of a steel lower bowl section


30


, and steel lip


31


. The inner surface of the rotor bowl has a lining


32


of a wear resistant material such as a ¼-inch layer of LINATEX™. Air supply pipe


36


runs up the center of rotor shaft


34


and connects the rotating union adapter


39


to flow control valves


37


. Union adapter


39


connects the rotor shaft to rotating union


50


. A cover


51


is provided to shield the union


50


and adapter


39


.




The flow control valves


37


are operated by compressed air which is supplied to the rotor by rotating union


50


. The purpose of the rotating union is to provide the compressed air from a storage tank


52


(to which pressurized air is periodically supplied through


53


) via two stationary supply lines


40


to the two rotating supply lines


36


without loss of pressure. Compressed air runs from tank


52


via line


155


through a filter, regulator and lubricator assembly (not shown) to a solenoid valve


56


. Valve


56


has outlet line


40


and exhaust port


57


. It operates so that compressed air is provided to the outlet line


40


and when compressed air is not provided to line


40


, it is open to its exhaust port


57


. An electronic control (not shown) can be provided to control the compressed air to the line


40


to be varied, and the exhaust port


57


can be throttled for fine tuning.




Flow control valves


37


are shown in detail in

FIG. 3 through 11

. They are generally “muscle valve”, air controlled valves, modified versions of the type manufactured by The Clarkson Company. Each valve unit


37


consists of valve body


100


, valve sleeve


102


, valve muscle


104


, end cap


106


and exit bushing


108


. The valve body


100


is preferably cast from polyurethane plastic of hardness 75D and is relatively short in length to reduce particle acceleration in the valve. Each valve unit


37


has a central bore


110


formed in valve sleeve


102


which communicates with the hopper outlets. One end of sleeve


102


forms an annular flange


103


which is held in a corresponding depression


105


in valve body


100


. Metal ring


115


is sealed at its end to valve body


100


and metal ring


117


is sealed to end cap


106


to retain the valve muscle


104


on either side of its central thicker area


119


. The valve muscle


104


is slightly pre-compressed to fit in chamber


116


. O-ring


107


seals between end cap


106


and valve body


100


, and O-ring


109


seals the entrance to compressed air passage


112


. Bolts


113


,


125


secure the valve assembly to the machine, and screws


111


fasten the valve body


100


to end cap


106


.




Compressed air passageway


11


communicates with the compressed air supply in the hopper assembly with passageway


114


extending to chamber


116


in which the valve muscle


104


is seated with a slight clearance around its outer surface. Unlike other valves of this type, due to the abrasive nature of the environment of this machine, the air passageways extend axially and are embedded in the body of the valve rather than extending perpendicularly from the valve body. When pressurized air is provided to passageway


114


and thereby to the exterior surface of the valve muscle


104


, the sleeve


102


is compressed in the central region thereof and the diameter of the central bore


110


in the central region thereof is constricted, thereby constricting the flow of concentrate. By increasing the air pressure, the degree of constriction is increased. When air pressure to the valve in passageway


112


is reduced, the central region of sleeve


102


dilates. Thus the diameter of the central bore


110


can be varied continuously from a fully closed state to its maximum diameter while maintaining a generally circular cross-section. In fact, the cross-section shape of the bore remains circular until the diameter is about 50% of the open diameter, after which it pinches together between 4 sides and, as the bore becomes fully closed, pinches between 3 sides. This facilitates passing coarse particles even when the diameter is reduced and allows adjustment of the orifice while the machine is in operation.




Due to the high pressures involved in the device, it is necessary to relieve pressure to the outer surface of sleeve


102


, and between sleeve


102


and valve muscle


104


, by a pressure relief hole


130


. This prevents transitory air leakage from chamber


116


around the ends of muscle valve


104


which otherwise would cause the sleeve


102


to balloon inwardly and out bore


110


.




End plate


106


is secured to the valve body


100


through threaded holes


121


using screws


111


or the like. O-ring


107


is provided in annular depression


129


to seal the end plate


106


to the valve body


100


. Bushing


108


, of tungsten carbide or like material, around bore


110


resists abrasion from the flow of concentrate and may be rotated periodically to increase its part life. To secure the valve body


100


to the machine, bolt


113


is provided through hole


124


. Two further bolts


125


are provided through slots


126


. In this way the valve can be fully removed by removing bolt


113


and simply loosening the two remaining bolts


125


.




In operation, air pressure is typically first applied to the flow control valves


37


to close them. Motor


9


is activated to rotate the rotor. The slurry feed is introduced to the spinning rotor through feed pipe


18


. Centrifugal forces cause the slurry to climb up the inner surface of the rotor bowl past slot


55


before being expelled past lip


31


, into tailings launder


14


and thence out of the machine through discharge port


19


. The hoppers are initially empty prior to introduction of the slurry. They rapidly fill with solids as the slurry is introduced. The hopper outlets remain closed during the initial stage. As the process advances, heavier concentrate accumulates in the retention zone. This accumulation of concentrate fills the hoppers. The controlled opening of the flow control valves


37


now operates to remove some of the material from the hopper. Such material is expelled by centrifugal force through valve bore


110


into concentrate launder


16


. The diameter of orifice


110


may be varied automatically by a process controller or manually. To prevent clogging, it can be programmed to automatically and periodically “burp” open from a constricted diameter of, for example ⅛ inches to an open diameter of ⅜ inches every few minutes. The preferred fully open diameter of sleeve


102


is ½ inch. Similarly, in a Kelsey jig for example, a vibration monitor could detect an imbalance condition indicating a blocked spigot which would then automatically enlarge the valve orifice.





FIG. 12

is a chart comparing the size of particle which can pass through the valve of the present invention at a given flow constriction, to that of a conventional pinch valve. The vertical axis plots the maximum diameter of sphere which can pass through the orifice which is ½ inch at its maximum opening. The horizontal axis plots the percentage of the maximum cross-sectional area to which the orifice is constricted. The solid line illustrates the performance of the concentric closure of the invention, while the doted line plots the conventional pinch valve, which is subject to frequent blockages when the maximum particle passage size hits 0.150 inches. The chart thus illustrates that the concentric closure of the present invention permits a greater percentage closure of the flow before reaching the limit of frequent blockage. This results from the fact that in the pinch valve, the perimeter of the orifice remains constant while its shape changes to reduce the cross-sectional area, while in the present invention the perimeter of the orifice decreases as the cross-sectional area decreases.




As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, various modifications and adaptations of the structure above described may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention, the scope of which is to be construed in accordance with the accompanying claims.



Claims
  • 1. A centrifugal concentrator for separating particulate material of higher specific gravity from particulate material of lower specific gravity, comprising a) a rotating member adapted for rotation about an axis, (b) material supply means to deliver said particulate material into said rotating member, c) a plurality of cavities for receiving said particulate material of higher specific gravity, extending radially outwardly with respect to the axis of rotation of said rotating member, said cavities each having an outwardly-extending outlet, and d) a flow control valve for controlling the flow of material from said outwardly-extending outlets of said cavities; wherein said flow control valve comprises a fluid inlet communicating with said outwardly-extending outlet, a fluid outlet and a passage communicating therebetween and having a cross-sectional radius in the plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of said passage, wherein said passage is radially constrictible from a fully open to a closed condition while maintaining a cross-sectional shape which is substantially circular over a major range of such radial constriction wherein said flow control valve comprises a cylindrical elastomeric valve member disposed within said passage, and an annular elastomeric constrictor element mounted coaxially around said cylindrical elastomeric valve member and having a central thickened region for contacting and constricting said cylindrical elastomeric valve member and wherein said flow control valve further comprises a valve body, said valve body comprising a passageway communicating with a compressed gas supply for supplying gas under pressure to the exterior of said annular elastomeric constrictor element to thereby constrict said passage, and wherein said flow control valve comprises a pressure relief passage extending from the outer surface of said cylindrical elastomeric valve member, at a location axially inwardly from said annular elastomeric constrictor element, and communicating to the exterior of the valve body.
  • 2. The centrifugal concentrator of claim 1 where in said radially constrictible passage of said flow control valve has a cross-sectional shape which is substantially circular over at least half said range of radial constriction of said passage.
  • 3. The centrifugal concentrator of claim 1 wherein said radially constrictible passage of said flow controlling means has a maximum dimension in the plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of said passage which remains comparable to the dimension of said passage perpendicular to said maximum dimension over a substantial range of radial constriction of said passage.
  • 4. The centrifugal concentrator of claim 1 wherein said radially constrictible passage of said flow control valve has a maximum diameter of at least one-half inch.
  • 5. The centrifugal concentrator of claim 1 wherein said range of radial constriction of said passage is from at least as small as ⅛ inch to at least as great as ½ inch.
  • 6. The centrifugal concentrator of claim 1 wherein said annular elastomeric constrictor element is held in a chamber in said valve body and is pre-compressed to fit said chamber.
  • 7. The centrifugal concentrator of claim 1 wherein said passageway communicating with a compressed gas supply for supplying gas under pressure to the exterior of said annular elastomeric constrictor element extends substantially axially within said valve body.
  • 8. The centrifugal concentrator of claim 1 wherein said gas is air.
  • 9. A flow control valve for a centrifugal concentrator for separating particulate material of higher specific gravity from particulate material of lower specific gravity, wherein said centrifugal concentrator comprises a) a rotating member adapted for rotation about an axis, (b) material supply means to deliver said particulate material into said rotating member, and c) a plurality of cavities for receiving said particulate material of higher specific gravity, extending radially outwardly with respect to the axis of rotation of said rotating member, said cavities each having an outwardly-extending outlet; said flow control valve controlling the flow of material from said outwardly-extending outlet; wherein said flow control valve comprises a fluid inlet communicating with said outwardly-extending outlet, a fluid outlet and a passage communicating therebetween and having a cross-sectional radius in the plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of said passage, wherein said passage is radially constrictible from a fully open to a closed condition while maintaining a cross-sectional shape which is substantially circular over a major range of such radial constriction and wherein said flow control valve comprises a cylindrical elastomeric valve member disposed within said passage, and an annular elastomeric constrictor element mounted coaxially around said cylindrical elastomeric valve member and having a central thickened region for contacting and constricting said cylindrical elastomeric valve member and wherein said flow control valve further comprises a valve body, and said valve body comprises a passageway communicating with a compressed gas supply for supplying gas under pressure to the exterior of said annular elastomeric constrictor element to thereby constrict said passage, and wherein said flow control valve comprises a pressure relief passage extending from the outer surface of said cylindrical elastomeric valve member, at a location axially inwardly from said annular elastomeric constrictor element, and communicating to the exterior of the valve body.
  • 10. The flow control valve of claim 9 wherein said radially constrictible passage of said flow control valve has a cross-sectional shape which is substantially circular over at least half said range of radial constriction of said passage.
  • 11. The flow control valve of claim 9 wherein said radially constrictible passage of said flow control valve has a maximum dimension in the plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of said passage which remains comparable to the dimension of said passage perpendicular to said maximum dimension over a substantial range of radial constriction of said passage.
  • 12. The flow control valve of claim 9 wherein said radially constrictible passage of said flow control valve has a maximum diameter of at least one-half inch.
  • 13. The flow control valve of claim 9 wherein said range of radial constriction of said passage is from at least as small as ⅛ inch to at least as great as ½ inch.
  • 14. The flow control valve of claim 9 wherein said annular elastomeric constrictor element is held in a chamber in said valve body and is pre-compressed to fit said chamber.
  • 15. The flow control valve of claim 9 wherein said passageway communicating with a compressed gas supply for supplying gas under pressure to the exterior of said annular elastomeric constrictor element extends substantially axially within said valve body.
  • 16. The flow control valve of claim 9 wherein said gas is air.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2238897 May 1998 CA
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/CA99/00428 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO99/61161 12/2/1999 WO A
US Referenced Citations (14)
Number Name Date Kind
1882389 Maclsaac Oct 1932 A
3047008 Clarkson Jul 1962 A
3090591 Clarkson May 1963 A
3823869 Loison Jul 1974 A
3955758 Loison May 1976 A
4279741 Campbell Jul 1981 A
4347971 Novoselac Sep 1982 A
4454041 Kelsey Jun 1984 A
4898666 Kelsey Feb 1990 A
4998986 Campbell Mar 1991 A
5338284 Knelson Aug 1994 A
5462513 McAlister Oct 1995 A
5601523 Knelson Feb 1997 A
6149572 Knelson Nov 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
1632324 Oct 1970 DE
4402041 Aug 1995 DE
973457 Oct 1964 GB
1465311 Feb 1977 GB
2133722 Aug 1984 GB
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Thompson, Della (9 eds), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995, pp. 1550-1551.