The present invention relates to fluid process control systems. In particular, the present invention relates to diagnostic systems for fluid flow in process control systems.
Fluid flow meters are used in industrial process control environments to measure fluid flow and provide flow signals for flow indicators and controllers. Inferential flow meters measure fluid flow in a pipe by measuring a pressure drop near a discontinuity within the pipe. The discontinuity (primary element) can be an orifice, a nozzle, a venturi, a pitot tube, a vortex shedding bar, a target or even a simple bend in the pipe. Flow around the discontinuity causes both a pressure drop and increased turbulence. The pressure drop is sensed by a pressure transmitter (secondary element) placed outside the pipe and connected by impulse lines or impulse passageways to the fluid in the pipe. Reliability depends on maintaining a correct calibration. Erosion or buildup of solids on the primary element can change the calibration. Impulse lines can become plugged over time, which also adversely affects calibration.
Disassembly and inspection of the impulse lines is one method used to detect and correct plugging of lines. Another known method for detecting plugging is to periodically add a “check pulse” to the measurement signal from a pressure transmitter. This check pulse causes a control system connected to the transmitter to disturb the flow. If the pressure transmitter fails to accurately sense the flow disturbance, an alarm signal is generated indicating line plugging. Another known method for detecting plugging is sensing of both static and differential pressures. If there is inadequate correlation between oscillations in the static and differential pressures, then an alarm signal is generated indicating line plugging. Still another known method for detecting line plugging is to sense static pressures and pass them through high pass and low pass filters. Noise signals obtained from the filters are compared to a threshold, and if variance in the noise is less than the threshold, then an alarm signal indicates that the line is blocked.
These known methods rely on providing static pressure sensors or disassembly of the flow meter, increasing complexity and reducing reliability. These known methods do not provide for diagnosing the condition of the primary element. There is thus a need for a better diagnostic technology providing more predictive, less reactive maintenance for reducing cost or improving reliability.
A flow diagnostic system is disclosed for coupling to a primary flow sensing element via impulse lines. The flow diagnostic system may include a pressure transmitter that couples to the impulse lines and generates digital pressure data representing pressure.
A control system receives the pressure data and provides the pressure data and real time clock readings associated with pressure data to a diagnostic application stored in the flow diagnostic system.
The diagnostic application includes a first algorithm that calculates a difference between the pressure data and a moving average of the pressure data.
The diagnostic application also includes a second algorithm that receives the difference and calculates a trained data set of historical pressure data during a training mode and calculates a current pressure data set during a monitoring mode and then generates diagnostic data as a function of the current pressure data set relative to the historical pressure data, which indicates changes in the condition of flow sensing.
The diagnostic application includes a third algorithm that generates a report indicating the diagnostic data.
The diagnostic application can be provided over a network from an application service provider (ASP) or other source and can run on the control system, the ASP or another remote computer.
In the present invention, a flow diagnostic system is provided that can diagnose the condition of either the primary element or impulse lines connected to a pressure transmitter. A diagnostic application is downloadable over a network from an application service provider (ASP), or can be obtained from a computer-readable medium such as a CD-ROM or removable disc. The diagnostic application can run on the control system, a remote computer or the ASP and provide a diagnostic report. The diagnostic application runs on a processor that is high powered relative to the low power embedded processor found in the pressure transmitter. With the use of the high powered processor, sophisticated diagnostics can be performed in real time and provide prompt reports to a plant operator about the condition of primary elements or impulse lines or both. There is no need to use processing time on the processor imbedded in the transmitter for diagnostics, and the transmitter can perform its measurement tasks rapidly.
The term “pressure generator” as used in this application means a primary element (e.g., an orifice plate, a pitot tube, a nozzle, a venturi, a shedding bar, a bend in a pipe or other flow discontinuity adapted to cause a pressure drop in flow) together with impulse pipes or impulse passageways that couple the pressure drop from locations near the primary element to a location outside the flow pipe. The spectral and statistical characteristics of this pressure presented by this defined “pressure generator” at a location outside the flow pipe to a connected pressure transmitter 102 can be affected by the condition of the primary element as well as on the condition of the impulse pipes. The connected pressure transmitter can be a self-contained unit, or it can be fitted with remote seals as needed to fit the application. A flange on the pressure transmitter 102 (or its remote seals) couples to a flange adapter on the impulse lines 104 to complete the pressure connections in a conventional manner. The pressure transmitter 102 couples to a primary flow element 106 via impulse lines 104 to sense flow. Primary element 106, as illustrated, is an orifice plate clamped between pipe flanges 105.
Pressure transmitter 102 is coupled to the impulse lines 104 and provides pressure data along line 110 to a control system 112. Pressure transmitter 102 is preferably a differential pressure transmitter. Line 110 is typically a conventional 4-20 mA loop that provides all of the electrical energization for transmitter 102 and also carries digital pressure data representing the pressure sensed by pressure transmitter 102. Pressure transmitter 102 includes an embedded microprocessor that generates the digital pressure data, however, the computing power of the embedded microprocessor is limited by the power available from the 4-20 mA loop. The digital pressure data is typically transmitted in a standard industry format using a digital protocol such as HART, Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, CAN or the like.
Control system 112 receives the digital pressure data on line 110 and providing the pressure data and real time clock readings associated with pressure data to a diagnostic application stored in the flow diagnostic system 100.
As explained in more detail below, the diagnostic application can be a application 134 that is stored in and running on a processor in control system 112, an application 130 stored in and running on a processor at an application service provider 126, an application 132 stored in and running on a processor in a remote computer 122 or any combination of these locations. In each of these locations, relatively high power computing is available in comparison to the limited computing power available from the embedded processor in transmitter 102. An arrangement where the diagnostic application is stored on one computer (112, 122 or 126) and running on another one of the computers (112, 122, 126) is also contemplated.
The diagnostic application (134, 130, 132 or a combination of 134, 130 or 132) includes a first algorithm calculating a difference between the pressure data and a moving average of the pressure data. The diagnostic application further includes a second algorithm receiving the difference and calculating a trained data set of historical pressure data during a training mode and calculating a current pressure data set during a monitoring mode and generating diagnostic data as a function of the current pressure data set relative to the historical pressure data indicating changes in the condition of flow sensing. The diagnostic application also includes a third algorithm generating a report indicating the diagnostic data. The report can be presented to an user at control system monitor 114, a printer 124 or monitor associated with remote computer 122 or a report 128 generated by the application service provider 126. It is appreciated that the report can take a variety of forms or displays that communicate the diagnostic data to the user.
The control system 112 couples along line 118 to a network 116. Network 116 also couples along line 120 to the remote computer 122, and couples along line 127 to the application service provider 126. Typically, the remote computer 122 is located in the offices of the plant operator, while the line 127 is a long distance connection, typically over the internet, to an application service provider 126 at any desired location.
The network 116 can provide the diagnostic application to the control system 112 or the remote computer 122. The network can also provide the pressure data and associated real time clock readings to the diagnostic application running at the remote computer 122 or the application service provider 126.
The illustration in
Pressure transmitter 200 is coupled via impulse lines 201 to an integral orifice plate 202 in a fluid flow system. Pressure transmitter 200 couples to control system 206 along line 204. The pressure transmitter generates digital pressure data (P) and associated digital real time clock readings (RTC) as illustrated at 205. The real time clock readings provided by the transmitter 200 with each pressure reading indicate the relative time that each pressure reading is taken by the transmitter 200. In an instance where the transmitter generates pressure readings at a generally constant rate, the real time clock reading can be as simple as a sequential number for each reading. In an instance where the pressure reading are somewhat more irregularly spaced in time, the real time clock reading can be an approximate time that each reading taken.
The control system 206 receives the digital information 205 at a transmitter bus interface 208. Transmitter bus interface 208 formats the data properly for communication on the bus 210 that is internal to the control system 206. The information 205 is used by process control software 214 to couple control signals along line 215 to a valve or other control device. Control system 206 includes a network interface 212 that can pass the digital information 205 along to a network on line 218 in a case where the diagnostic application is not running on the control system 206. In a case where the diagnostic application is running on the control system 206, the network interface 212 can receive the diagnostic application from line 218 and format it for transmission over the bus 210. The network interface 212 is bidirectional. The control system 206 includes a processor, random access memory, non-volatile memory and I/O devices.
In
Pressure transmitter 300 is coupled via impulse lines 301 to an integral orifice plate 302 in a fluid flow system. Pressure transmitter 300 couples to control system 306 along line 304. The pressure transmitter generates digital pressure data (P) as illustrated at 305. Transmitter 300 may or may not generate real time clock readings, depending on the design of the transmitter.
In an instance where the transmitter 300 generates real time clock readings, these reading are coupled through transmitter bus interface 308 to real time clock circuit 318 via a bus 310 that is internal to control system 306. Real time clock circuit 318 then generates a corresponding synchronized real time clock reading that is synchronized with other real time clock readings in the control system 306. This synchronization allows for synchronized comparison of data from multiple transmitters, for example, in a case where differential pressure is measured using two absolute pressure transmitters.
In an instance where transmitter 300 does not generate any usable real time clock readings, then real time clock circuit 318 generates synchronized real time clock readings based on the time that the each pressure data point 305 is received by real time clock circuit 318.
In either instance, the pressure data and synchronized real time clock readings can be used by process control software 314 to couple control signals along line 315 to a valve or other control device. Control system 306 includes a network interface 312 that can pass digital information (pressure data 305 and synchronized real time clock readings) along to a network on line 318 in a case where the diagnostic application is not running on the control system 306. If the network connected to line 318 is busy or otherwise unavailable, then the digital information can be temporarily stored in storage device 320 and later transmitted via the network to a diagnostic application running on a remote computer. This storage 320 can also be used in instances where it is desired to use batch processing for diagnostics.
In a case where the diagnostic application is running on the control system 306, the network interface 312 can receive the diagnostic application from line 318 and format it for transmission over the bus 310 internal to control system 306.
A first algorithm 440 stored in computer 422 calculates a difference between the series of digital pressure data points received from network 316 and a moving average of the series of digital pressure data points. Real time clock readings associated with each digital pressure data point are used to ensure that the digital pressure data points, which may be delayed or out of order after passing through network 316, are reassembled in a correct time sequence at the input to algorithm 440. The difference calculated in algorithm 440 is coupled along line 442 to a second algorithm 444.
The second algorithm 444 is also stored in the computer 422. The second algorithm 444 receives the difference calculated by algorithm 440 and calculates a trained data set of historical data during a training mode and calculates a current data set during a monitoring mode and generates diagnostic data 446 as a function of the current data set relative to the historical data indicating changes in the condition of the pressure generator (not illustrated in FIG. 4).
A third algorithm 448 receives the diagnostic data 446 and generates a report 450 indicating the diagnostic data to a user. The report 450, as explained above, can take forms such as a monitor display or a printed report.
In
In
In difference algorithm 540, the moving average is calculated according to the series in Eq. 1:
In
In
The power spectral density data is preferably in the range of 0 to 100 Hertz. The center frequency of a bandpass filter can be swept across a selected range of frequencies to generate a continuous or quasi-continuous power spectral density as a function of frequency in a manner that is well known. Various known Fourier transforms can be used.
Power spectral density, Fi, can also be calculated using Welch's method of averaged periodograms for a given data set. The method uses a measurement sequence x(n) sampled at fs samples per second, where n=1, 2, . . . N. A front end filter with a filter frequency less than fs/2 is used to reduce aliasing in the spectral calculations. The data set is divided into Fk,i as shown in Eq. 2:
There are Fk,i overlapping data segments and for each segment, a periodogram is calculated where M is the number of points in the current segment. After all periodograms for all segments are evaluated, all of them are averaged to calculate the power spectrum:
Once a power spectrum is obtained for a training mode, this sequence is stored in memory, preferably EEPROM, as the baseline power spectrum for comparison to real time power spectrums. Fi is thus the power spectrum sequence and i goes from 1 to N which is the total number of points in the original data sequence. N, usually a power of 2, also sets the frequency resolution of the spectrum estimation. Therefore, Fi is also known as the signal strength at the ith frequency. The power spectrum typically includes a large number points at predefined frequency intervals, defining a shape of the spectral power distribution as a function of frequency.
In the detection of the primary element degradation, a relatively larger sample of the spectral density at baseline historical conditions and a relatively smaller sample of the spectral density at monitoring conditions are compared. The relatively smaller sample allows for a real time indication of problems in about 1 second. An increase in the related frequency components of the power spectrum can indicate the degradation of the primary element. Using orifice plates as primary elements, for example, changes as high as 10% are observed in spectral components when the orifice plate is degraded to a predetermined level. The amount of change can be adjusted as needed, depending on the tolerable amount of degradation and the type of primary element in use. The amount of change needed to indicate a problem is arrived at experimentally for each type of primary element arrangement. Fuzzy logic can also be used to compare the many points of the power spectrums.
The pressure data is typically a calibrated output, and the diagnostic data indicates if the pressure generator is out of calibration.
The algorithm starts at 702. A moving average is subtracted from differential pressure data as shown at 704 to calculate a difference. During a train mode, historical data on the calculated difference is acquired and stored at 706 as statistical data μ and σ, for example. During an operational MONITOR mode, current data on the difference is acquired and stored at 708 as statistical data X and s. The smaller sample of current data is compared to the larger sample of the historical data to diagnose the condition of the impulse lines. Comparisons 710 of historical and current statistical data are made at 714, 716, 718 and a selected diagnostic output is generated at 730, 732, 734 as a function of the comparisons made at 712, 714, 716, 718 respectively.
After completion of any diagnostic output, the process loops back at 720, 722, 724, 726 or 728 to repeat the monitor mode diagnostics, or the transmitter can be shut down until maintenance is performed. If the diagnostic process itself fails, an error indication is provided on the diagnostic output at 736. In the method of diagnosis illustrated in
In
The condition of the primary element can include erosion or fouling of the primary element. The method or algorithm starts at 802. Digital pressure data is gathered in a training mode or time interval as shown at 804. A power spectrum of the sensor data, minus the moving average, is calculated at 806. The power spectrum obtained is identified as the training power spectrum at 808 and stored in non-volatile memory 810. After completion of training, the process moves on to monitoring or normal use. A further power spectrum of current pressure data, minus the moving average, is evaluated at 812, and the power spectrum so obtained in stored in memory 814, that can be either RAM or nonvolatile memory. At 816, the power spectrum Fi obtained during training is compared to the power spectrum Fi obtained during monitoring. If there is a significant difference between Fi and Fi which is indicative of a problem with the primary element, a primary element warning (PE Warning) is generated as shown at 818. If the power spectrums Fi and Fi are sufficiently similar, then no primary element warning is generated. After the comparison at 816 and generation of a PE Warning, as needed, program flow moves to obtain new real time pressure data at 820 and the monitoring process moves on to a new evaluation at 812, or the flow meter can shut down when there is a PE warning. The process in
In
At process 912, power spectral density for the current real time data is calculated (as explained above in connection with FIG. 8). The current power spectral density is compared to the historical power spectral density at 914, and if there is a difference large enough to indicate a problem with the primary element, then a PE Warning is generated as shown at 916. If the differences in the power spectral densities are small, then no PE warning is generated as shown at 918. Program flow continues on at 920 to repeat the IL and PE diagnostics, or the flow meter can be shut down if there is a PE or IL warning until maintenance is performed.
Any of the methods can be stored on a computer-readable medium as a plurality of sequences of instructions, the plurality of sequences of instructions including sequences that, when executed by a diagnostic application in a flow diagnostic system, cause the flow diagnostic system to perform a diagnostic method relative to a primary element and impulse lines coupled to the transmitter.
The flow diagnostics system can also be used with a transmitter (not illustrated) which includes remote seals connected by flexible capillary tubes that are filled with a controlled quantity of isolation fluid such as silicone oil. The isolator arrangement permits the transmitter electronics to be spaced away from extremely hot process fluids which contact the remote seals. The flow diagnostics system can also be used to detect leaking and pinching off of capillary tubes using the diagnostic techniques described above to provide diagnostic data.
The flow diagnostics system can also be used with a transmitter (not illustrated) which connects to taps near the bottom and top of a tank. The transmitter provides an output that represents a time integral of flow in and out of the tank. The transmitter includes circuitry, or alternatively software, that measures the differential pressure between the taps and computes the integrated flow as a function of the sensed differential pressure and a formula stored in the transmitter relating the sensed pressure to the quantity of fluid in the tank. This formula is typically called a strapping function and the quantity of fluid which has flowed into or out of the tank can be integrated as either volumetric or mass flow, depending on the strapping function stored in transmitter. The transmitter can be located either near the bottom or the top of tank, with a tube going to the other end of the tank, often called a “leg.” This leg can be either a wet leg filled with the fluid in the tank, or a dry leg filled with gas. Remote seals can also be used with such a transmitter.
In one embodiment, the flow diagnostic system includes a signal preprocessor algorithm that isolates signal components in the pressure data such as frequencies, amplitudes or signal characteristics which are related to a plugged impulse line or degraded primary element. The signal preprocessor provides an output to a signal evaluator in the difference algorithm. The signal preprocessor isolates a portion of the signal by filtering, performing a wavelet transform, performing a Fourier transform, use of a neural network, statistical analysis, or other signal evaluation techniques. Such preprocessing is preferably implemented in the difference algorithm or in a specialized digital signal processor.
The signal components are isolated through signal processing techniques in which only desired frequencies or other signal characteristics such as amplitude are identified and an indication of their identification is provided. Depending upon the strength signals to be detected and their frequency, signal preprocessor can comprise a filter, for example a band pass filter, to generate the isolated signal output. For more sensitive isolation, advanced signal processing techniques are utilized such as a Fast Fourier transform (FFT) to obtain the spectrum of the sensor signal. In one preferred embodiment, the signal preprocessor comprises a wavelet processor which performs a wavelet analysis on the sensor signal as shown in
Wavelet analysis is a technique for transforming a time domain signal into the frequency domain which, like a Fourier transformation, allows the frequency components to be identified. However, unlike a Fourier transformation, in a wavelet transformation the output includes information related to time. This may be expressed in the form of a three dimensional graph with time shown on one axis, frequency on a second axis and signal amplitude on a third axis. A discussion of wavelet analysis is given in On-Line Tool Condition Monitoring System With Wavelet Fuzzy Neural Network, by L. Xiaoli et al., B JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING pgs. 271-276 (1997). In performing a continuous wavelet transformation, a portion of the sensor signal is windowed and convolved with a wavelet function. This convolution is performed by superimposing the wavelet function at the beginning of a sample, multiplying the wavelet function with the signal and then integrating the result over the sample period. The result of the integration is scaled and provides the first value for continuous wavelet transform at time equals zero. This point may be then mapped onto a three dimensional plane. The wavelet function is then shifted right (forward in time) and the multiplication and integration steps are repeated to obtain another set of data points which are mapped onto the 3-D space. This process is repeated and the wavelet is moved (convolved) through the entire signal. The wavelet function is then scaled, which changes the frequency resolution of the transformation, and the above steps are repeated.
The continuous wavelet transformation described above requires extensive computations. Therefore, in one embodiment, a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) which is well suited for real time implementation in a control system or personal computer is performed. One efficient discrete wavelet transform uses the Mallat algorithm which is a two channel sub-band coder. The Mallet algorithm provides a series of separated or decomposed signals which are representative of individual frequency components of the original signal.
In some embodiments, padding is added to the signal by adding data to the sensor signal near the borders of windows used in the wavelet analysis. This padding reduces distortions in the frequency domain output. This technique can be used with a continuous wavelet transform or a discrete wavelet transform. “Padding” is defined as appending extra data on either side of the current active data window, for example, extra data points are added which extend 25% of the current window beyond either window edge. In one embodiment, the padding is generated by repeating a portion of the data in the current window so that the added data “pads” the existing signal on either side. The entire data set is then fit to a quadratic equation which is used to extrapolate the signal 25% beyond the active data window.
The algorithm evaluates the isolated signal received from the signal preprocessing and in one embodiment, monitors an amplitude of a certain frequency or range of frequencies identified and provides a diagnostic output if a threshold is exceeded. Signal evaluator can also comprise more advanced decision making algorithms such as fuzzy logic, neural networks, expert systems, rule based systems, etc. Commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/623,569 describes various decision making systems which can be implemented in a signal evaluator and is incorporated herein by reference.
The diagnostic application performs diagnostics related to the impulse piping or primary element using information derived from a differential pressure sensor. The following describes a number of embodiments for realizing a diagnostic application. The diagnostic application can provide a residual lifetime estimate, an indication of a failure, an indication of an impending failure or a calibration output which is used to correct for errors in the sensed process variable.
A. Polynomial Curvefit
In one embodiment of the present invention empirical models or polynomial curve-fitting are used to detect line plugging or primary element degradation. A polynomial-like equation which has a combination of input signals such as various statistical parameters can be used to detect primary element degradation or impulse line plugging. Constants for the equations can be stored in a memory or received over the network.
B. Neural Networks
The signal can be analyzed using a neural network. One such neural network is a multi-layer neural network. Although a number of training algorithms can be used to develop a neural network model for different goals. One embodiment includes the known Backpropagation Network (BPN) to develop neural network modules which will capture the nonlinear relationship among a set of input and output(s).
C. Threshold Circuitry
This embodiment uses a set of if-then rules to reach a conclusion on the status of the impulse piping or primary element. This embodiment may be implemented easily in analog or digital circuitry. For example, with a simple rule, if the signal drops a certain amount below a historical mean, an output can be provided which indicates that an impulse line is plugged or is in the process of becoming plugged. Of course, more complex rules can be used which use multiple statistical parameters or signal components of the sensor signal to provide more accurate or different information.
D. Wavelets
With this embodiment, one or more of the decomposition signal(s) in a wavelet analysis directly relate to line plugging and are used to diagnose the transmitter.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, various function blocks of the invention have been described in terms of algorithms, however, many function blocks may be implemented in other forms such as digital and analog circuits, software and their hybrids. When implemented in software, a processor performs the functions and the signals comprise digital values on which the software operates. A general purpose processor programmed with instructions that cause the processor to perform the desired process elements, application specific hardware components that contain circuit wired to perform the desired elements and any combination of programming a general purpose processor and hardware components can be used. Deterministic or fuzzy logic techniques can be used as needed to make decisions in the circuitry or software. Because of the nature of complex digital circuitry, circuit elements may not be partitioned into separate blocks as shown, but components used for various functional blocks can be intermingled and shared. Likewise with software, some instructions can be shared as part of several functions and be intermingled with unrelated instructions within the scope of the invention.
This is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/257,896, filed Feb. 25, 1999 now abandoned which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/623,569, filed Mar. 28, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,143, and this application is also a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/383,828, filed Aug. 27, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,654,697.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3096434 | King | Jul 1963 | A |
3404264 | Kugler | Oct 1968 | A |
3468164 | Sutherland | Sep 1969 | A |
3590370 | Fleischer | Jun 1971 | A |
3618592 | Stewart et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3688190 | Blum | Aug 1972 | A |
3691842 | Akeley | Sep 1972 | A |
3701280 | Stroman | Oct 1972 | A |
3849637 | Caruso et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3855858 | Cushing | Dec 1974 | A |
3952759 | Ottenstein | Apr 1976 | A |
3973184 | Raber | Aug 1976 | A |
RE29383 | Gallatin et al. | Sep 1977 | E |
4058975 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4099413 | Ohte et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4102199 | Talpouras | Jul 1978 | A |
4122719 | Carlson et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4249164 | Tivy | Feb 1981 | A |
4250490 | Dahlke | Feb 1981 | A |
4279013 | Cameron et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4337516 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4399824 | Davidson | Aug 1983 | A |
4417312 | Cronin et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4517468 | Kemper et al. | May 1985 | A |
4528869 | Kubo et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4530234 | Cullick et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4571689 | Hildebrand et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4635214 | Kasai et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4642782 | Kemper et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4644479 | Kemper et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649515 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4668473 | Agarwal | May 1987 | A |
4686638 | Furuse | Aug 1987 | A |
4707796 | Calabro et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4720806 | Schippers et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4736367 | Wroblewski et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4736763 | Britton et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4777585 | Kokawa et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4807151 | Citron | Feb 1989 | A |
4818994 | Orth et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4831564 | Suga | May 1989 | A |
4841286 | Kummer | Jun 1989 | A |
4853693 | Eaton-Williams | Aug 1989 | A |
4873655 | Kondraske | Oct 1989 | A |
4907167 | Skeirik | Mar 1990 | A |
4924418 | Bachman et al. | May 1990 | A |
4926364 | Brotherton | May 1990 | A |
4934196 | Romano | Jun 1990 | A |
4939753 | Olson | Jul 1990 | A |
4964125 | Kim | Oct 1990 | A |
4988990 | Warrior | Jan 1991 | A |
4992965 | Holter et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5005142 | Lipchak et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5019760 | Chu et al. | May 1991 | A |
5043862 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053815 | Wendell | Oct 1991 | A |
5067099 | McCown et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5081598 | Bellows et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5089979 | McEachern et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5089984 | Struger et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5098197 | Shepard et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5099436 | McCown et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103409 | Shimizu et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5111531 | Grayson et al. | May 1992 | A |
5121467 | Skeirik | Jun 1992 | A |
5122794 | Warrior | Jun 1992 | A |
5122976 | Bellows et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5130936 | Sheppard et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134574 | Beaverstock et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5137370 | McCullock et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142612 | Skeirik | Aug 1992 | A |
5143452 | Maxedon et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148378 | Shibayama et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5167009 | Skeirik | Nov 1992 | A |
5175678 | Frerichs et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5193143 | Kaemmerer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197114 | Skeirik | Mar 1993 | A |
5197328 | Fitzgerald | Mar 1993 | A |
5212765 | Skeirik | May 1993 | A |
5214582 | Gray | May 1993 | A |
5224203 | Skeirik | Jun 1993 | A |
5228780 | Shepard et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235527 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5265031 | Malczewski | Nov 1993 | A |
5265222 | Nishiya et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269311 | Kirchner et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274572 | O'Neill et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282131 | Rudd et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282261 | Skeirik | Jan 1994 | A |
5293585 | Morita | Mar 1994 | A |
5303181 | Stockton | Apr 1994 | A |
5305230 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5311421 | Nomura et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317520 | Castle | May 1994 | A |
5327357 | Feinstein et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333240 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5340271 | Freeman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347843 | Orr et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349541 | Alexandro, Jr. et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5357449 | Oh | Oct 1994 | A |
5361628 | Marko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365423 | Chand | Nov 1994 | A |
5365787 | Hernandez et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367612 | Bozich et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5384699 | Levy et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386373 | Keeler et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388465 | Okaniwa et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394341 | Kepner | Feb 1995 | A |
5394543 | Hill et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5404064 | Mermelstein et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408406 | Mathur et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408586 | Skeirik | Apr 1995 | A |
5410495 | Ramamurthi | Apr 1995 | A |
5414645 | Hirano | May 1995 | A |
5419197 | Ogi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430642 | Nakajima et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434774 | Seberger | Jul 1995 | A |
5436705 | Raj | Jul 1995 | A |
5440478 | Fisher et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442639 | Crowder et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5467355 | Umeda et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5469070 | Koluvek | Nov 1995 | A |
5469156 | Kogura | Nov 1995 | A |
5469735 | Watanabe | Nov 1995 | A |
5469749 | Shimada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5481199 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483387 | Bauhahn et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485753 | Burns et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486996 | Samad et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488697 | Kaemmerer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489831 | Harris | Feb 1996 | A |
5495769 | Broden et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5510779 | Maltby et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511004 | Dubost et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526293 | Mozumder et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539638 | Keeler et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548528 | Keeler et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5560246 | Bottinger et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5561599 | Lu | Oct 1996 | A |
5570300 | Henry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572420 | Lu | Nov 1996 | A |
5573032 | Lenz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591922 | Segeral et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598521 | Kilgore et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600148 | Cole et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608650 | McClendon et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623605 | Keshav et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5633809 | Wissenbach et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637802 | Frick et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640491 | Bhat et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5661668 | Yemini et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665899 | Willcox | Sep 1997 | A |
5669713 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671335 | Davis et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675504 | Serodes et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675724 | Beal et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680109 | Lowe et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682317 | Keeler et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5700090 | Eryurek | Dec 1997 | A |
5703575 | Kirpatrick | Dec 1997 | A |
5704011 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705978 | Frick et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708211 | Jepson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708585 | Kushion | Jan 1998 | A |
5710370 | Shanahan et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713668 | Lunghofer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719378 | Jackson, Jr. et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5736649 | Kawasaki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741074 | Wang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742845 | Wagner | Apr 1998 | A |
5746511 | Eryurek et al. | May 1998 | A |
5747701 | Marsh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752008 | Bowling | May 1998 | A |
5764539 | Rani | Jun 1998 | A |
5764891 | Warrior | Jun 1998 | A |
5781878 | Mizoguchi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790413 | Bartusiak et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801689 | Huntsman | Sep 1998 | A |
5805442 | Crater et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817950 | Wiklund et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828567 | Eryurek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829876 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848383 | Yunus | Dec 1998 | A |
5859964 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876122 | Eryurek | Mar 1999 | A |
5880376 | Sai et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887978 | Lunghofer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5908990 | Cummings | Jun 1999 | A |
5923557 | Eidson | Jul 1999 | A |
5924086 | Mathur et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926778 | Pöppel | Jul 1999 | A |
5936514 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940290 | Dixon | Aug 1999 | A |
5956663 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970430 | Burns et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6014902 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016523 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016706 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017143 | Eryurek et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023399 | Kogure | Feb 2000 | A |
6038579 | Sekine | Mar 2000 | A |
6045260 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047220 | Eryurek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047222 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052655 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6072150 | Sheffer | Jun 2000 | A |
6112131 | Ghorashi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119047 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119529 | Di Marco et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139180 | Usher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151560 | Jones | Nov 2000 | A |
6182501 | Furuse et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192281 | Brown et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195591 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199018 | Quist et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236948 | Eck et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263487 | Stripf et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6298377 | Hartikainen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311136 | Henry et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327914 | Dutton | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347252 | Behr et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360277 | Ruckley et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370448 | Eryurek | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397114 | Eryurek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6425038 | Sprecher | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6480793 | Martin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
20020145568 | Winter | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
32 13 866 | Oct 1983 | DE |
35 40 204 | Sep 1986 | DE |
40 08 560 | Sep 1990 | DE |
43 43 747 | Jun 1994 | DE |
44 33 593 | Jun 1995 | DE |
195 02 499 | Aug 1996 | DE |
296 00 609 | Mar 1997 | DE |
197 04 694 | Aug 1997 | DE |
19930660 | Jul 1999 | DE |
299 17 651 | Dec 2000 | DE |
0 122 622 | Oct 1984 | EP |
0 413 814 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 487 419 | May 1992 | EP |
0 512 794 | May 1992 | EP |
0 594 227 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0 624 847 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 644 470 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 825 506 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0 827 096 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 838 768 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 807 804 | Nov 1997 | EP |
1058093 | May 1999 | EP |
1 022 626 | Jul 2000 | EP |
2 302 514 | Sep 1976 | FR |
2 334 827 | Jul 1977 | FR |
928704 | Jun 1963 | GB |
1 534 280 | Nov 1978 | GB |
2 310 346 | Aug 1997 | GB |
2 342 453 | Apr 2000 | GB |
2342453 | Apr 2000 | GB |
2347232 | Aug 2000 | GB |
58-129316 | Aug 1983 | JP |
59-116811 | Jul 1984 | JP |
59163520 | Sep 1984 | JP |
59-211196 | Nov 1984 | JP |
59-211896 | Nov 1984 | JP |
60-507 | Jan 1985 | JP |
60000507 | Jan 1985 | JP |
60-76619 | May 1985 | JP |
60-131495 | Jul 1985 | JP |
60174915 | Sep 1985 | JP |
62-30915 | Feb 1987 | JP |
64-1914 | Jan 1989 | JP |
64001914 | Jan 1989 | JP |
64-72699 | Mar 1989 | JP |
2-5105 | Jan 1990 | JP |
03229124 | Nov 1991 | JP |
5-122768 | May 1993 | JP |
06242192 | Sep 1994 | JP |
7-63586 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07234988 | Sep 1995 | JP |
07294356 | Nov 1995 | JP |
8-54923 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08114638 | May 1996 | JP |
8-136386 | May 1996 | JP |
HEI81996-136386 | May 1996 | JP |
8-166309 | Jun 1996 | JP |
HEI81996-166309 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08247076 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2712625 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2712701 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2753592 | Mar 1998 | JP |
07225530 | May 1998 | JP |
10-232170 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11083575 | Mar 1999 | JP |
3129121 | Nov 2000 | JP |
3139597 | Dec 2000 | JP |
3147275 | Dec 2000 | JP |
WO 9425933 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9611389 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9612993 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9639617 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9721157 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9725603 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9806024 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9813677 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9820469 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9839718 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9919782 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0055700 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0070531 | Nov 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020029130 A1 | Mar 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09257896 | Feb 1999 | US |
Child | 09852102 | US | |
Parent | 08623569 | Mar 1996 | US |
Child | 09257896 | US | |
Parent | 09852102 | US | |
Child | 09257896 | US | |
Parent | 09383828 | Aug 1999 | US |
Child | 09852102 | US |