Flow director for line burner

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6537064
  • Patent Number
    6,537,064
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 4, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 25, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A burner having improved flame quality even at high turn-down ratios. The burner includes a flow director which is preferably a bent sheet or plate positioned in the burner to alter the flow geometry of the air component into a series of channels where the air mixes with the fuel. Preferably the flow director is perforated, the perforations providing a second avenue for the flow of air into the mixing channel.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to burners, in particular, line burners for use in web supporting and drying apparatus, although other applications are within the scope of the invention.




According to conventional combustion science, each type of burner flame (e.g., premix flame, diffusion flame, swirl flame, etc.) burns with a different optimal stoichiometric mix of fuel to combustion air, by which low emission concentrations in the burner flue gas appear. It is therefore important to control or maintain the desired optimal stoichiometry of the burner. Failure to closely regulate the burner air/fuel ratio over the range of burner output can lead to poor flame quality and stability (flameout, yellow flames, etc.) or excessive pollution (high NO


X


, CO).




The turn-down ratio of a burner is the ratio of a maximum firing rate to a minimum firing rate for a particular burner, where firing rate is the measure of the amount of fuel gas consumed per hour, such as BTU/hour. A high turn-down ratio is preferred, since this indicates that the burner is consuming less fuel at the minimum firing rate.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,662,467, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference, discloses a nozzle mixing line burner having a combustion chamber and a nozzle body having two channels, each of which receives air and fuel. The mixture of air and fuel from each channel is discharged into the combustion chamber where they are mixed. However, at most turned-down firing conditions (i.e., low firing rates), mixture is inadequate and flame quality is diminished.




It would therefore be desirable to improve the flame quality of line burners especially at low firing rates.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The problems of the prior art have been overcome by the present invention, which provides a burner having improved flame quality even at high turn-down ratios or low firing rates. The burner includes a flow director which is preferably a bent sheet or plate positioned in the burner to alter the flow geometry of the air component into a series of channels where the air mixes with the fuel. Preferably the flow director is perforated, the perforations providing a second avenue for the flow of air into the mixing channel.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a line burner in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 2

is cross-sectional view of a line burner in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a section view of the flow director for the burner in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 4

is a schematic view showing air flow in a burner in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a schematic view showing air flow in a burner in accordance with the prior art;





FIG. 6

is a schematic view showing air flow in a burner in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention; and





FIG. 7

is a cross-sectional view of a flow director in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Turning first to

FIG. 2

, a nozzle body


18


is shown having a fuel distribution chamber


20


, two rows of opposing fuel/air mixing channels


22


,


24


, and one or more fuel passages


26


,


28


providing communication between fuel-distribution chamber


20


and each mixing channel


22


,


24


. The nozzle body is preferably constructed of iron and is unitary, although other materials such as aluminum or sheet metal can be used. Fuel is dispersed from the fuel distribution chamber


20


, which has a triangular cross-section, into each mixing channel


22


,


24


by the respective fuel passages


26


,


28


, as shown by the arrows


69


in FIG.


2


. The channels


22


,


24


are angled and converge towards a combustion chamber defined by opposite side walls


63


(

FIG. 5

, only one side wall shown) attached to the nozzle body


18


so that the flame


17


fires into the combustion chamber. This burner design is that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,662,467 and familiarity therewith is assumed.




As illustrated in

FIG. 5

, nozzle body


18


of burner


10


includes two rows of opposing angled fuel/air mixing channels


22


(only one shown) which extend between spaced front and back faces


30


,


32


of the nozzle body


18


. Air enters channels


22


,


24


in a predominantly parallel direction relative to the outer walls of each channel


22


,


24


as shown by arrows


97


. In contrast, fuel passage


26


communicating with each channel


22


,


24


is located along the innermost side of each angled channel


22


,


24


. As a result, there is an impingement zone


17


where the air and fuel mix to provide flame stability. However, evaluation of the burner in operation indicates that the flame


41


has regions where the flame is not well established. The voids within the flame


41


are most obvious at locations where the fan could most easily force the air through the nozzle body


18


, suggesting a location where the mix of air and fuel is not optimal, or the air flow through body


18


is not uniform.




In order to ensure adequate mixing of the air and fuel components and uniform air flow,

FIGS. 1 and 2

show the placement of a flow director


118


in the nozzle body


18


upstream of the inlets to the channels


22


,


24


in order to direct the flow of air into one or preferably both of the rows of mixing channels


22


,


24


in accordance with the present invention. The flow director


118


forces the air


121


to distribute along an air gap


122


(

FIG. 1

) created between each leg


38


of the nozzle body


18


(which leg


38


can be unitary with the nozzle body or coupled thereto by any suitable means known to those skilled in the art, such as welding or riveting, and which also can serve as a mounting wall for an air housing) and the free flange end


45


of each flow director


118


. This gap


122


extends in the longitudinally direction along the entire length of the flow director


118


. In addition, a plurality of apertures


119


are formed in the flow director


118


, which apertures


119


also allow source air


120


to enter each channel


22


,


24


. Preferably the apertures are circular and evenly spaced as shown, although other shapes can be used. The apertures


119


should align with corresponding apertures in the nozzle body


18


providing entry into the channels


22


,


24


. The air gap


122


is preferably at least as wide as the diameter of the apertures


119


. It is most preferably ⅜ of an inch wide.




As illustrated in

FIG. 4

, primary air


121


is sheltered by the redistribution zone


123


defined by the flow director


118


and the nozzle body


18


. Secondary air


120


is a smaller air component relative to primary air


121


, and is traveling in a well-defined direction when discharged through apertures


119


. The primary air


121


is quieted by redistribution zone


123


, and flows to fill in around the discharge of secondary air


120


as shown in FIG.


3


. The secondary air


120


, which has a velocity, assists the primary air


121


in flowing into the channels


22


,


24


and combines with the primary air


121


.




Comparing the area of the secondary holes


119


to the combined slot and hole area, it is found that this ratio is 0.23. Thus, it is expected that about ¼ of the flow into the channel


22


is from the secondary holes


119


. If a separate, high pressure air source were used to supply the secondary air to holes


119


, then a much smaller amount of area, about 5%, could be used since the higher pressure would give the secondary air a much higher velocity. The amount should be less than 50%, however. If the holes provide too much flow, the flow may stratify on the opposite wall.




The flow director


118


causes the air


97


to assume a general directionality more like the path of the fuel/air mixing channels


22


,


24


. Flow director


118


promotes the resulting focused air


124


to mix with the fuel


69


at the end of fuel passages


26


,


28


before the mixture leaves the air/gas mixture zone


125


in each of the channels


22


,


24


. Although the present invention should not be so limited, it is believed that the improved mixing is due to the following phenomenon. Since the fuel


69


voids from fuel passages


26


,


28


with some velocity, the best mixing potential is found where the fuel is just leaving passages


26


,


28


due to cross-velocity with the impinging air. By focusing the air


124


to generally flow along the innermost side of the channels


22


,


24


, the air is available to mix with the fuel in the most ideal location for intimate and complete mixing. The arrows in

FIG. 4

illustrate the respective flows of the air


125


and fuel


69


, in contrast to the prior art flow of

FIG. 5

where the air


97


is predominantly aligned toward the outermost side of the channels


22


,


24


. Since the volume of air


97


is larger than the volume of fuel


69


, the air tends to force the fuel volume toward the innermost side, leaving a two component, mostly stratified and laminar flow where the fuel has little opportunity to mix early on with the air in the prior art device.




Flow director


118


is preferably constructed of 20 ga steel, formed into a generally inclined cross-section with a multiple of bends or steps. The preferred configuration is illustrated in the drawings, particularly

FIG. 7

, and includes a first free flange end


45


which is substantially parallel to nozzle leg


38


; a first bent section


46


extending substantially orthogonally from the flange end


45


; a second bent section


47


extending substantially orthogonally from first bent section


46


and being substantially parallel to nozzle leg


38


, the second bent section being longer than the first free flange end


45


; a third bent section


48


extending substantially orthogonally from the second bent section


47


, the third bent section


48


having formed therein a plurality of spaced apertures


119


in the direction along the longitudinal direction of the nozzle


18


, the third bent section


48


being shorter than the first bent section


46


; a fourth bent section


49


extending from the third bent section in a direction substantially parallel to the channel


22


; and a fifth bent section


50


extending from the fourth bent section


49


in a direction substantially orthogonal to the nozzle leg


38


. The fifth bent section


50


is attached to nozzle body


18


between the fuel distribution chamber


20


and channel


22


by any suitable means, such as welding, screwing, riveting or trapping with an end cap. Preferably the flow director


118


extends longitudinally along each side of nozzle body


18


to serve a majority of the channels


22


,


24


with a distributed air flow


124


. Most preferably, the flow director


118


extends longitudinally along each side of nozzle body


18


to serve all of the channels


22


,


24


, with the provision for a gap in flow director


118


to provide access for the burner ignition and flame supervision devices to pass through. In the preferred embodiment, the flow director


118


is 2.125 inches long and {fraction (13/32)} inches high, and the apertures


119


are ⅜ inch diameter holes spaced on 1 inch centers.




The flow director


118


can be formed as an integral part of the nozzle body


18


, or can be a separate sheet attached during or after construction of the nozzle body


18


.





FIG. 6

illustrates an alternative embodiment of the flow distributor of the present invention. In this embodiment, redistribution of air and proper mixing is accomplished by one or more perforated plates


90


, and the optional use of a deflector or swirl producing device


92


. The perforated plate(s)


90


have a series of spaced apertures


91


positioned along their length. In the preferred design, the open area (per foot of burner length) of the plate


90


is between about 5-40%, more preferably 10-20%, most preferably about 15.2% for a single plate. If multiple plates are used, then an open area of about 40 to about 75% would be effective, preferably about 60% to about 65%.




The deflector


92


is a bent sheet positioned at the elbow


95


of the nozzle body


18


as shown. It functions to deflect the incoming air in the direction of the arrows and promotes uniform mixing in the passageway


22


. The length of the free end


93


of the deflector


92


can be readily determined by those skilled in the art for optimal mixing.




Desirable turn-down ratios are 10-20, which allow stable minimum firing rates.



Claims
  • 1. A burner comprising a nozzle body having a front face and a back face spaced from said front face, said back face being in communication with an air supply and with a fuel supply, said nozzle body comprising:a channel between said front face and said back face, said channel having an air inlet for receiving air from said air supply and having a fuel inlet receiving fuel from said fuel supply, and at least one flow director positioned upstream of said air inlet, said flow director directing the flow of air into said air inlet to mix said air supply with said fuel in said channel; said flow director having a free end, a first bent portion extending from said free end, a second bent portion extending from said first bent portion, a third bent portion extending from said second bent portion, a fourth bent portion extending from said third bent portion, and a fifth bent portion extending from said fourth bent portion and being coupled to said nozzle body.
  • 2. The burner of claim 1, wherein said nozzle body further comprises opposite sides extending from said back face, and wherein said at least one flow director defines with one of said opposite sides a redistribution zone for flow of said air supply prior to said air supply entering said inlet.
  • 3. The burner of claim 1, wherein said flow director comprises a plurality of apertures.
  • 4. The burner of claim 1, wherein said third bent portion comprises a plurality of apertures.
  • 5. The burner of claim 1, wherein each of said bent portions is bent at an angle of about 90°.
  • 6. A burner comprising a nozzle body having a front face and a back face spaced from said front face, said back face being in communication with an air supply-and a fuel supply, said nozzle body comprising:two rows of a plurality of channels between said front face and said back face, each said channel having an air inlet for receiving air from said air supply and having a fuel inlet for receiving fuel from said fuel supply, and a flow director positioned upstream of each said air inlet, each flow director directing the flow of air into each said air inlet to cause said air to mix with said fuel in each of said channels; said flow director having a free end, a first bent portion extending from said free end, a second bent portion extending from said first bent portion, a third bent portion extending from said second bent portion, a fourth bent portion extending from said third bent portion, and a fifth bent portion extending from said fourth bent portion and being coupled to said nozzle body.
  • 7. The burner of claim 6, wherein said third bent portion comprises a plurality of apertures.
  • 8. The burner of claim 6, wherein each of said bent portions is bent at an angle of about 90°.
US Referenced Citations (24)
Number Name Date Kind
25626 Buckwalter Oct 1859 A
1771875 Cowardin et al. Jul 1930 A
1960609 Werner May 1934 A
1990962 Thorson Feb 1935 A
2276131 Wiant Mar 1942 A
2824603 Reed Feb 1958 A
3174527 Reed et al. Mar 1965 A
3178161 Yeo et al. Apr 1965 A
3237677 Wiesenthal et al. Mar 1966 A
3297259 Maxon, Jr. et al. Jan 1967 A
3511589 Rothhaar et al. May 1970 A
4155700 Babington May 1979 A
4340180 Belknap et al. Jul 1982 A
4379689 Morck, Jr. Apr 1983 A
4403947 Spielman Sep 1983 A
4483832 Schirmer Nov 1984 A
4598553 Saito et al. Jul 1986 A
4963089 Spielman Oct 1990 A
5057008 Dielissen Oct 1991 A
5131836 Coppin Jul 1992 A
5236350 Cummings, III et al. Aug 1993 A
5611684 Spielman Mar 1997 A
5662467 Jones Sep 1997 A
6036480 Hughes et al. Mar 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
1 591 994 Jun 1970 FR