I. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a flow divider that promotes equal distribution between parallel trains and separation.
II. Description of the Related Art
Modern oil and gas production has increasingly relied on installations wherein the collection, separation, boosting, and transport of production fluids takes place. These process plants may comprise a wide range of equipment, such as the number of multi or single phase pumps and/or compressors, multi or single stage pumps or compressors, and/or other kinds of equipment that are arranged in parallel in order to transport and/or process the production fluids from the source to some remote location. This parallel configuration is referred to as parallel trains. Before the production fluids reach the parallel trains, the production fluids are collected into larger pipes that lead to the trains. Before the production fluids enter the boosting equipment, the flow of production fluids must be divided equally between the trains. If both pumps and compressors are used in parallel, the production fluid must typically be feed into separation equipment, heat exchangers etc. in order to separate the liquid phase and the gas phase. In this case the gas phase is fed into one or more compressors and the liquid phase is fed into one or more pumps, wherein the pressure of the gas and liquid phases are considerably increased before they are transported through pipelines to some remote location. Regardless if the separators are necessary or not, the flow of production fluids must be divided as evenly as possible before the flow reaches the boosting trains, in order to utilize the maximum rated power of the boosting trains and to ensure equal distribution of the inhibitors.
The conventional solution is to feed the collected production fluids into some sort of manifold, wherein the fluids are mixed and distributed into two or more parallel trains. However, this solution may result in an uneven and fluctuating distribution of the production fluids and possible inhibitors, and as a consequence the separation equipment, heat exchangers, pumps and especially compressors have to be dimensioned for sufficient capacity to deal with temporary fluctuations and peaks. This over-dimensioning of equipment results in increased costs and weight of the process plant, and by ensuring a more even and constant distribution of production fluids to the parallel trains would result in significant savings and improved distribution of inhibitors. Also, the violent mixing of the production fluid right before it enters the separation equipment results in longer dwell times in the separators and a need for larger separation equipment, these factors also add to the cost.
The present invention provides a flow divider that divides the fluid flow more evenly and with less mixing of the fluids than conventional solutions.
It is an important feature that the fluid is equally distributed over the cross section upstream of the flow divider, e.g. bending and restriction immediately upstream of the flow divider should be avoided.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, it may be of importance that the production fluid 6 carried in the production pipeline 7 to the flow divider 1 is stirred to the least degree possible. Tests have shown that a largely undisrupted flow of production fluid over longer stretches through a pipeline, results in a large degree of separation of the production fluid already in the pipeline. If this multi-phase flow is allowed to reach the separators 8 upstream of the boosting equipment 9, 10, without being disrupted by various restrictions along the pipeline 7 and pressure equalizing manifolds, the separators 8 will have an easier job completing the separation of the production fluid 6, thereby increasing the efficiency of the boosting process.
The flow divider 1 according to the present invention contributes significantly to this end. According to one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the dividing fin 3 is arranged vertically by the inlet 2 of the flow divider 1. The shape and design of the inlet 2, dividing fin 3, and outlets 4, 5, may be optimized in this regard to ensure that the layered and partly pre-separated production fluid 6 may continue calmly and undisrupted on its way to the separators 8 and boosting equipment 9, 10.
If the flow has to be divided into more than two separate streams, further flow dividers may be arranged further downstream of the first flow divider 1.
If the pipeline 7 collects production fluids from more than one well, as is often the case, this collection may take place somewhere upstream of the flow dividers, ensuring that the distance between the collection point and the flow divider 1 is sufficient to promote an even distribution over the cross section area of the inlet 2 and possibly a predetermined degree of separation or layering in the pipeline 7 before the layered production fluid enters the flow divider 1, separation equipment 8, or a pump or compressor. It is understood that several factors can help determine how long the pipeline 7 must be in order to promote an even distribution over the cross sectional area and possibly separation, i.e. the physical properties of the production fluids, flow rate, dimensions of the pipeline 7, and the degree of separation that is preferred.
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is also possible to arrange the dividing fins 3 horizontally at one or more predetermined levels in the flow divider 1. This is shown in
It is understood that the flow divider 1 according to the present invention also may be used for single phase flow. In a one phase flow, the fin may form a cross dividing the flow into four. However, the full potential of the present invention is reached when the separation of the production fluid flow in the pipeline 7 before the flow divider 1 is allowed to commence, and preferably has reached a stable layered multiphase flow with distinct interfaces between the various phases.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20055356 | Nov 2005 | NO | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/NO2006/000408 | 11/10/2006 | WO | 00 | 10/30/2008 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2007/055590 | 5/18/2007 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 794015 | Hostetler | Jul 1905 | A |
| 1378054 | Pratt | May 1921 | A |
| 1505208 | Larner | Aug 1924 | A |
| 1778326 | Kutzer | Oct 1930 | A |
| 1984242 | Trainer et al. | Dec 1934 | A |
| 2467547 | Birnbaum | Apr 1949 | A |
| 3625258 | Phelps | Dec 1971 | A |
| 4705114 | Schroeder et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 5165450 | Marrelli | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5232475 | Jepson | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5248218 | Belcher | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5286375 | Marrelli | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5322551 | Payne | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5507858 | Jepson | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5582271 | Mielo | Dec 1996 | A |
| 6544420 | Høydal et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6620221 | Lenzing et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6929035 | Debaisieux et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6983852 | Hemstock et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7021336 | Burrows et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7152885 | Takamatsu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7278543 | Sagatun et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 20050150842 | Puik | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 199 44 189 | Apr 2001 | DE |
| 2 042 427 | Aug 1995 | RU |
| 2 045 982 | Oct 1995 | RU |
| 2 098 714 | Dec 1997 | RU |
| 2 107 159 | Mar 1998 | RU |
| 2 149 672 | May 2000 | RU |
| 19 771 | Oct 2001 | RU |
| 2 207 449 | Jun 2003 | RU |
| 2 234 358 | Aug 2004 | RU |
| 2 241 519 | Dec 2004 | RU |
| 46 835 | Jul 2005 | RU |
| 2 340 384 | Aug 2005 | RU |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090159528 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |