Not applicable—this invention was conceived and developed entirely using private source funding; this patent application is being filed and paid for entirely by private source funding.
This invention relates to manufacture of plastic articles and more particularly relates to pneumatic conveyance and processing of plastic resin pellets prior to molding or extrusion of those pellets into a finished or semi-finished plastic product.
In this patent application, injection and compression molding presses and extruders are collectively referred to as “process machines.”
The plastics industry is very diversified; there are thousands of different products, hundreds of materials, and dozens of processes, and all are very different from one another. The only thing all these differences share in common is that the source material is some type of plastic.
Equipment sold to this industry is, therefore, very diverse in design. Plastics factories have multiple process machines, sometimes several hundred in one location. Virtually all plastics fabricating operations require that each process machine, namely a molding press or an extruder, be supplied automatically with the required raw resin material on a continuous basis. This resin may be supplied in large boxes, called Gaylords, in fiber drums, in 50 pound bags, or more typically may be delivered by bulk truck or rail car, with the resin material then being transferred in bulk into storage silos. In all cases the resin material must be further distributed throughout the plant to each and every process machine. For that reason a great deal of design and capital expense is devoted to the automatic distribution of the raw resin material throughout the plant.
These resin distribution systems, more commonly referred to as “Loading Systems”, must deal with many variables. One set of variables includes the type, shape, size and consistency of the granular material.
Resin pellets, nominally about ⅛ inch in size, come in various shapes, with round, square, and cylindrical being the most common.
Flowing resin powder is also an option, and very fine but free flowing resin pellets and other granular materials may be conveyed as well,
The design variables to be considered for each customer include:
In all of these areas, system designers look to find improved methods and solutions whenever possible.
VFD (Variable Frequency Drive) motors allow vacuum pumps to operate at different speeds, and therefore at different CFM rates, with the vacuum pump pulling different vacuum levels depending on preset information about each receiver being served, and/or making adjustments based on real time feedback of vacuum sensors located at various places in the system.
The addition of a SCFM (Standard Cubic Feet per Minute) limiter in the air flow line allows oversized vacuum pumps to be used without risk of conveying at excessive velocity. SCFM limiters restrict air flow to a preset SCFM. This maintains the desired SCFM air flow at the inlet, which is critical for proper conveying for a given size conveying line. This concept is the subject of co-pending parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/185,016, published 20 Aug. 2015 as United States patent publication 2015/0232287 A1.
Reading vacuum levels at various points tells the controlling processor if the line is open, which means only air and no material is present and air is flowing unrestrictedly. This signals a loss of material at the source. A high vacuum reading indicates a plugged or nearly plugged line. Normal conditions are present where material is flowing correctly at detected mid-vacuum levels.
One line size for all receivers assures the resin transport velocity is more likely to be in the acceptable range. However, most processes require the base resin material be delivered at 50 times the rate of additives, such as color concentrate. Virgin (or natural) pellets may have to be loaded at a rate of 1000 pounds per hour, requiring a 2.5 or 3 inch line size, while color is only required to be delivered at a rate of 20 to 40 pounds an hour. A smaller receiver is used for color, namely a receiver one that loads perhaps 5 pounds at a time, while the receiver for the virgin resin material will be larger, perhaps loading 50 pounds of each load cycle. A 2.5 inch line on a 5 pound receiver would be too large. 1.5 inch line would be standard, and the use of 1.5 inch resin conveying line would be better. But this risks velocities that are excessive. This results in trade-offs in design.
Current resin central loading systems concerned with conveying granular plastic resin pellets from a storage area for molding or extrusion typically include a vacuum pump or pumps and multiple receivers.
In some systems, with many receivers, several small pumps are used.
It would be less expensive to use only one, or fewer, larger pumps. However, a larger pump may draw too much air with resulting damage to the material being conveyed. While a larger pump could load several receivers at once, there is a risk that an “open” line, namely a line pulling only air, and no resin material, would cause the vacuum to drop too much, and no resin would load. Also, when only one receiver is loading resin, air velocity might be too high, again with a risk of damaging the resin.
Nevertheless, in facilities that fabricate plastic products by molding or extrusion, it is common to use such vacuum loading systems to pneumatically convey pellets of thermoplastic resin, prior to molding or extrusion of those pellets into a finished or semi-finished product. The plastic resin pellets are typically purchased in 50 pound bags, 200 pound drums, or 1,000 pound containers commonly referred to as “Gaylords.”
A common approach for conveying plastic resin pellets from a storage location to a process machine, which approach is often used in larger facilities, is to install a central vacuum pump or even several vacuum pumps, connected by common vacuum lines to multiple “receivers.”
Vacuum pumps connected to the vacuum lines draw vacuum, namely air at pressure slightly below atmospheric, as the vacuum pump sucks air through the “vacuum” line. The suction moves large quantities of air which carries thermoplastic resin pellets through the “vacuum” line.
An alternative is to use positive pressure produced by a blower or the exhaust side of a vacuum pump. With such an approach, the positive pressure results in a movement of substantial amounts of air which may be used to carry the plastic resin pellets. However, the vacuum approach of drawing or sucking or pulling pellets through the system conduit(s) is preferable to the positive pressure approach of pushing the resin pellets through the system conduit(s).
In practice, vacuum pumps are preferred and vacuum lines are desirable in part because power requirements to create the required vacuum necessary to draw plastic resin pellets through the lines are lower than the power requirements if the plastic resin pellets are pushed through the lines by a blower or by the exhaust side of a vacuum pump. When vacuum is used, the static pressure within the line may be not much less than atmospheric. When positive pressure is used, the dynamic pressure of the air flowing through the line must be relatively high in order to move an adequate quantity of plastic resin pellets.
As used herein, and in light of the foregoing explanation, the terms “vacuum pump” and “blower” are used interchangeably.
When one or more central vacuum pumps are connected to multiple receivers, each receiver is typically located over an individual temporary storage hopper, in which the plastic resin pellets are temporarily stored before being molded or extruded. Each temporary storage hopper is typically associated with a separate process machine.
In current practice, the receiver is connected by a control wire to a central control system. The control system works by selectively opening a vacuum valve located in each receiver, allowing one or several vacuum pumps to work in sequence drawing “vacuum”, i.e. below atmospheric pressure air, to carry the pellets among and to multiple receivers as individual ones of the receivers, positioned over individual hoppers associated with the individual process machines, require additional plastic resin pellets. The receiver for a given hopper-process machine combination is typically actuated by opening a vacuum valve located in or near the receiver, causing the receiver to supply plastic resin pellets by gravity feed into the hopper from where the pellets may be fed further by gravity downwardly into the associated process machine.
Large, high capacity industrial vacuum pumps are reliable and are suited to heavy duty industrial use. These large, high capacity vacuum pumps allow long conveying distances for the plastic resin pellets. Currently available large capacity vacuum pumps permit plastic resin pellets to be conveyed over distances of 200 feet or more using vacuum drawn by the pump. Use of such high capacity vacuum pumps results in a big rush of below atmospheric pressure air through the line, carrying the plastic resin pellets over a long distance. The vacuum pump speed is not modulated; the vacuum pump is either “on” or “off.” As a result, when the pump is operating, “vacuum”, more accurately “air”, is drawn at a fixed rate by the vacuum pump through the system.
Operators of plastic manufacturing facilities prefer to buy plastic resin pellets in bulk, in rail cars or tanker trucks. Bulk purchases result in cost savings. Plastic resin pellets delivered in bulk are typically pumped into large silos for storage. In a large manufacturing facility, the distance from a plastic resin pellet storage silo to a process machine may be several hundred feet, or more. Accordingly, when plastic resin pellets are purchased in bulk, a central vacuum-powered conveying system, powered by one or more large, high capacity industrial vacuum pumps, is a necessity.
Typically, large central plastic resin pellet conveying systems have one or more vacuum pumps, each typically being from 5 to 20 horsepower. These central systems include central controls connected by wire to each receiver associated with each process machine in the facility. Typically eight, sixteen, thirty-two or sixty-four receivers, each associated with a process machine, may be connected to and served by the central plastic resin pellet vacuum conveying system. Of course, the higher the number of receivers served by the system, the higher the cost. The central control is connected by wire to each receiver and is used to signal when a receiver is empty and therefore needs and should receive granular resin material. The central control, wired to each receiver, does not measure vacuum level at the receiver and is not in any way used to moderate or modulate operation of the vacuum pump.
A factor to be considered in designing such a system is the speed of the plastic resin pellets as they flow through a conduit as the plastic resin pellets are carried by the moving air stream drawn by the vacuum pump. If air flow is too slow, the plastic resin pellets fall out of the air stream and lie on the bottom of the conduit, with resulting risk of clogging the conduit. If air flow is too fast, the plastic resin pellets can skid along the conduit surface. In such case, harder, more brittle plastic resin pellets may be damaged, resulting in dust within the conduit, which when drawn into the vacuum pump can damage the vacuum pump and render the system inoperative. Softer plastic resin pellets heat up and can melt from friction when contacting the conduit interior surface. This results in the aforementioned “angel hair”—long, wispy-thin strands of plastic film which eventually clog the conduit and cause the system to shut down.
For these reasons, pneumatic plastic resin pellet conveying systems must be designed to produce desired, reasonable conveying speeds for the plastic resin pellets.
Currently, conveying speed of the plastic resin pellets is most often controlled by controlling air flow, measured in cubic feet per minute, and varying the desired and designed cubic feet per minute based on conduit diameter, with a larger diameter conduit requiring more cubic feet per minute of air flow to maintain proper air flow speed through the conduit. Controlling air flow, measured in cubic feet per minute, is conventionally done by specifying the vacuum pump capacity; vacuum pump speed modulation is not within the state of the art.
Controlling cubic feet per minute of air flow is an indirect way of controlling plastic resin pellet speed as the plastic resin pellets flow through a conduit of a given diameter. Typically, a 2 inch diameter conduit requires about 60 cubic feet per minute of air flow to convey typical plastic resin pellets. A 2½ inch diameter conduit typically requires about 100 cubic feet per minute of air flow to convey typical plastic resin pellets. To achieve these desired air flow volume flow rates, a designer must carefully match the horsepower of a vacuum pump, which has a given cubic feet of air per minute rating, to a selected size conduit, taking into consideration the average distance the plastic resin pellets must be conveyed through the conduit from a storage silo to a receiver or loader (because resin conveyance systems are not designed for modulation of vacuum pump speed, for the reason noted above—vacuum pump speed modulation is not within the state of the art). If this results in selection of a 5 horsepower blower/vacuum pump, then a given facility may require several such blowers/vacuum pumps, with each blower/vacuum pump supplying only a selected number of receivers.
A single plastic resin molding or extruding facility might theoretically require a 20 horsepower blower and the corresponding cubic feet per minute capability for resin conveyance provided by the single blower to meet the total resin conveying requirements for plastic resin pellets throughout the facility. However, a single twenty horsepower blower would result in far too high a conveying speed for the plastic resin pellets through any reasonable size conduit. As a result, the conveying system for the plastic resin pellets in a large facility is necessarily divided and powered by three or four smaller blowers, resulting in three or four different, separate systems for conveyance of plastic resin pellets. Sometimes several blowers are connected to a single set of receivers, with one or more of the extra blowers turning “on” only when required to furnish the required extra cubic feet per minute of air flow. This is controlled by a central station monitoring all receivers and all blowers, with the central station being programmed to maintain all of the hoppers associated with the process machines in a full condition, wherever those hoppers are located throughout the facility.
Even with careful planning and design, results achieved by such pneumatic plastic resin pellet conveying systems are not consistent. Air flow speed and cubic feet per minute capacity of blowers often vary and are outside of selected design and specification values.
This patent application incorporates by reference the disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 9,371,198 issued 21 Jun. 2016; and U.S. Pat. No. 9,604,793 issued 28 Mar. 2017; and U.S. Pat. No. 9,550,635 issued 24 Jan. 2017; and U.S. Pat. No. 9,550,636 issued 24 Jan. 2017; and U.S. Pat. No. 8,753,432 issued 17 Jun. 2014; as well as pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/804,404, published 12 Nov. 2015 as United States patent publication 2015/0321860.
The instant invention provides an improvement to known pneumatic plastic resin pellet conveying systems, reducing the costs of those systems while providing consistent control of delivered cubic feet per minute of air for individual receivers. The invention facilitates easy expansion of the pneumatic plastic resin pellet conveying system as needs grow.
Air flow control devices, desirably of the type disclosed herein and of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,371,198; 9,604,793; in U.S. Pat. No. 9,550,635; and in U.S. Pat. No. 9,550,636, are all suitable for use in the practice of this invention.
Use of these air flow limiters allows one large vacuum pump to be used without risk to the system or to the resin being conveyed. An added advantage of a very large vacuum pump is that it can fill multiple receivers or other devices simultaneously with resin. As used herein, the term “receiver” denotes the type of apparatus disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,089,794; 7,066,689, and 8,753,432. The disclosures of these patents as well as those listed in the preceding paragraph are hereby incorporated by reference.
In one of its aspects, this invention provides apparatus for conveying granular plastic resin material from a resin supply preparatory to molding or extruding that material into finished or semi-finished plastic parts, where the apparatus preferably includes at least one receiver or other device for receipt and temporary storage of the granular plastic resin material preparatory to molding or extrusion, a vacuum pump, a first conduit for conveyance of the granular plastic resin material from the supply to the receiver or other device, a second conduit for conveyance of a vacuum stream from the receiver or other device to the vacuum pump, and a variable speed drive for the vacuum pump.
The apparatus desirably further includes a microprocessor for controlling speed of the drive for the vacuum pump.
The apparatus yet further desirably includes a sensor for sensing one or more flow parameters such as static pressure, dynamic pressure, velocity, and the like preferably but not necessarily in the second conduit, with the sensor being connected to the microprocessor for furnishing flow parameter information to the microprocessor.
The apparatus may further include a plurality of flow parameter sensors for sensing flow parameter at selected positions, usually but not necessarily in the second conduit, and furnishing flow parameter information therefrom to the microprocessor.
The apparatus may yet further preferably include an algorithm within the microprocessor or associated therewith, for controlling the speed of the drive according to information received from the flow parameter sensor(s).
The apparatus may further include an air flow limiter desirably located between an outlet of the second conduit and a suction inlet of the vacuum pump.
The apparatus may further include a flow parameter sensor desirably located between the air flow limiter and a suction inlet to the pump. The apparatus may yet further include a second flow parameter sensor upstream of the air flow limiter but downstream of the receiver closest to the vacuum pump.
The air flow limiter portion of the invention may further include a solenoid for maintaining the air flow limiter at one of two pre-selected air flow settings according to whether the solenoid is energized. The air flow limiter may further be adjustable between a plurality of positions for differing air flows at each of the positions of the air flow limiter.
The flow parameter sensor may sense static pressure, or dynamic pressure, or temperature, or velocity, or relative humidity, all of which are embraced by the term “flow parameter” as used herein, and/or a plurality of sensors may be used including static pressure sensors, dynamic pressure sensors, anemometers, thermometers and hygrometers.
It is yet further within the scope of this invention to have the microprocessor connect with the variable speed drive wirelessly over the Internet, or by other wireless communication.
It is further within the scope of this invention to have the microprocessor connect with the flow parameter sensor or sensors wirelessly over the Internet or by other wireless communication.
The foregoing outlines rather broadly features of the invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be best understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention, as described hereinafter, may form the subject of certain of the claims of the application. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the concepts and specific embodiments disclosed herein may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing apparatus or other methods for carrying out the goals and results attained by this invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent implementations do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
In this application, unless otherwise apparent from the context it is to be understood that the use of the term “vacuum” means “air at slightly below atmospheric pressure.” The “vacuum” (meaning air at slightly below atmospheric pressure) provides a suction effect that is used to draw granular plastic resin material out of a supply and to convey that granular plastic resin material through various conduits to receivers or other devices such as gravimetric blenders in which the granular resin material can be temporarily stored before being molded or extruded. Hence, when reading this application it is useful for the reader mentally to equate the term “vacuum” with the term “suction”.
A fixed air flow limiter works for one resin conveying line size only. For example, an air flow limiter designed to limit flow to 100 SCFM is likely correct for 2 inch line size, as that air flow limiter limits velocity to the desired range for a 2 inch line. If a 1.5 inch line is a part of the system, the flow rate through that line should be reduced to about 70 SCFM. A fixed, non-adjustable CFM limiter cannot do both.
The invention may use a flow limiter having two settings, with the limiter preferably being solenoid operated as disclosed U.S. Pat. No. 9,550,635.
Referring to the drawings in general and to
Still referring to
Further illustrated in
Air, more specifically vacuum, is drawn out of the top of air flow limiter 30 by vacuum pump 92 as illustrated in
During operation of the resin conveying system shown schematically in
Air flow limiter 30 is preferably in the general form of a vertically oriented tube, preferably having inlet and outlet ends 54, 56 respectively. The tubular character of the preferred air flow limiter 30 is apparent from
As illustrated in
As shown in
The upper portion of baffle 52, defining fixed internal tubular segment 44, is adapted for sliding telescopic engagement with and for movement therealong by movable tubular segment 42. Movable tubular segment 42 moves telescopically along the exterior of fixed interior tubular segment 44. Fixed to movable tubular segment 42 is a first strut 48 preferably extending transversally across the upper portion of movable tubular segment 42 and preferably secured on either end to movable tubular segment 42, as illustrated in
Movable sail 34 is preferably planar and positioned fixedly on second strut 50 to remain perpendicular with respect to the axis of vertically oriented outer tube 32. Movable sail 34 is preferably of generally triangular configuration, as best illustrated in
Movable sail 34 is positioned within generally vertically oriented outer tube 32 so that rectangular extremity surfaces 76 are closely adjacent to but do not contact the inner surface of vertically oriented outer tube 32, so long as sail 34 moves vertically up and down within vertically oriented external tube 32. The rectangular shape of extremities 76 with their outwardly facing planar surface assures minimal friction and consequent minimal resistance to movement of movable sail 34 in the event one of rectangular extremities 76 contacts the interior surface of vertically oriented tube 32, should sail 34 for some reason move laterally or otherwise and become skew to the vertical axis of tube 32.
Movable internal tubular segment 42 is telescopically movable, unitarily with sail 34, relative to and along the exterior of fixed internal tubular segment 44. A lower limit of movement of movable tubular segment 42 is illustrated in
When air is flowing through an air flow limiter 30, as illustrated generally in
If air flow upwardly through an air flow limiter 30 reaches an extreme value, above an acceptable level of operation of the portion of the resin delivery system of which air flow limiter 30 is a part, the excessive force (resulting from the high volume of air flow contacting sail 34) pushes sail 34 upwardly to the point that upper annular edge 78 of movable internal tubular segment 42 contacts plate 46. In this condition, which is illustrated in
Once air flow stops through vertically oriented outer tube 32, gravity pulling downwardly on sail 34, connected movable internal tubular segment 42, and first and second struts 48, 50, causes these parts, which may be connected together and/or fabricated as a single integral assembly instead of a collection of individual parts assembled together such as shown in
With the self-regulating characteristic of air flow limiter 30, the assembly consisting of movable internal tubular segment 42, first and second struts 48, 50, and sail 34 may oscillate somewhat about the position at which air flow, drawn by suction created by vacuum pump 92, is at the desired level, as vacuum pump 92 drawing air through flow limiter 30 varies in cubic feet per minute of air drawn.
Desirably, ends of first strut 48, which is depicted as being horizontally disposed in the drawings, are mounted in movable tubular segment 42 in movable fashion such that first strut 48 can move slightly, rotationally, relative to movable internal segment 42. This is to provide a small amount of “play” in the event movable sail 34 and second strut 50, which is vertically oriented and connected to movable sail 34, become skew with respect to the vertical axis of vertically oriented exterior tube 32. Should this occur, the movable characteristic of first strut 48, being slightly rotatable relative to movable internal tubular segment 42, effectively precludes movable internal tubular segment 42 from binding with respect to fixed internal tubular segment 44 and thereby being restricted from what would otherwise be freely telescoping movement of movable internal tubular segment 42 relative to fixed internal tubular segment 44.
Desirably first strut 48 is rotatable relative to movable internal tubular segment 42, to provide maximum freedom of vertical motion of movable internal tubular segment 42 in the event movable sail 34 becomes skew to the axis of vertically oriented exterior tube 32, with consequent frictional force restricting vertical movement of movable sail 34.
Baffle 52 preferably includes two portions, the upper portion preferably being defined by fixed internal tubular segment 44 and a lower portion preferably being defined by conical portion 66 of baffle 52. A lower edge of baffle 52 is circular and is designated 84 in the drawings. Circular edge 84 fits closely against the annular interior wall of vertically oriented exterior tube 32 so that all air passing upwardly through air flow limiter 30, namely through vertically oriented exterior tube 32, is constrained to flow through the interior of baffle 52. The tight fitting of the circular lower edge of baffle 52 against the interior wall of vertically oriented exterior tube 32 forces all air entering flow limiter 30 from the bottom to flow through the interior of baffle 52, flowing upwardly through lower conical portion 66 of baffle 52.
The air then flows, due to suction drawn by vacuum pump 92, further upwardly through the interior of fixed internal tubular segment 44. Thereafter, if movable internal tubular segment 42 is spaced away from flow limiting horizontal plate 46, air flows along the surface of movable internal tubular segment 42, passing the upper annular edge 78 of movable internal tubular segment 42; air then flows around the space between edge 82 of flow limiting horizontal plate 46 and the interior annular wall of vertically oriented exterior tube 32. The air then flows out of air flow limiter 30 via open outlet end 56 formed in end cap 60, and into suction head 93, through which it is drawn by variable speed drive 94 of vacuum pump 92.
As illustrated in
In an alternate embodiment of air flow limiter 30, illustrated in
In another alternative environment of the air flow limiter, baffle 52 is one piece, preferably molded plastic, as illustrated in
The assembly illustrated in
Air flow limiter 30 preferably contain no springs. While an electromagnetic sensor is illustrated in
Each air flow limiter preferably includes a tubular valve, closing against a flat surface, where the tubular valve is defined by movable internal tubular segment 42 closing against flow limiting horizontal plate 46. Movable internal tubular segment 42 is in the form of an open-ended cylinder and is connected to a plate in the form of movable sail 34 to move movable tubular segment 42 against flow limiting horizontal plate 46. The air flow limiter 30 preferably uses gravity alone to open the valve defined by the assembly of movable internal tubular segment 42 and movable sail 34 and the connecting structure therebetween.
In the air flow limiters illustrated in
In the course of practice of the invention, different resin conveying and vacuum line sizes may be used. While 1½ inch and, less frequently, 2½ inch line sizes respectively are suggested and ordinarily used for the resin conveying line, the line size may be varied.
Microprocessor 200 serves to control the variable frequency drive housed within the variable speed drive unit 94 of the vacuum pump 92. Microprocessor 200 governs overall operation of the variable speed drive unit 94 by regulating frequency and voltage of electrical power furnished to variable speed drive unit 94.
Desirably the basic programming of microprocessor 200 is provided as user inaccessible firmware. User programmability of a display and functionality of the microprocessor is provided to control, protect and monitor the variable frequency drive unit 94 of vacuum pump 92. Microprocessor 200 may also control associated circuit breakers or fuses associated with vacuum pump 92.
Microprocessor 200 desirably provides an operator interface in the form of pushbuttons and “On-Off” switches (neither of which are illustrated in the drawings), thereby providing means for an operator to start and stop vacuum pump 92 and to adjust operating speed of vacuum pump 92 either by adjusting voltage provided to the vacuum pump motor or by changing the frequency of the current supplied to the vacuum pump motor. Additional control functions available to an operator include reversing and switching between manual speed adjustment and automatic control as effectuated by microprocessor 200. Desirably, microprocessor 200 includes an alphanumeric display, indicator lights, and meters to provide information regarding operation of variable speed drive 94. Parameters displayed include voltage, current and frequency of the supplied electrical power, speed of the vacuum pump drive motor, instantaneous torque of the vacuum pump drive motor, and the like. An operator interface keypad and display are desirably provided on the front of microprocessor 200 (these are not shown in the drawings, to enhance drawing clarity), facilitating operator control and input of data as respecting microprocessor 200 and effectuating operation of variable speed drive 94 to provide optimal control over vacuum pump 92.
Use of the variable speed drive 94 provides significant cost reductions in the form of energy savings, which are especially pronounced when drive 94 is driving a vacuum pump such as vacuum pump 92. In typical pump applications, the load torque and load power vary with the square and the cube respectively of the speed of the rotating impeller element. Use of variable speed drive 94 provides a substantial power reduction as compared to fixed speed operation and results in only a relatively small reduction in speed of the vacuum pump. Vacuum pump 92 equipped with variable speed drive 94 when operating at about 65% of its rated speed consumes only about 25% of the power which would be required at full speed if a variable speed drive such as unit 94 were not used. Use of variable speed drive 94, together with microprocessor 200, facilitates optimal control of the flowing air stream, flow rate, pressure and the like.
Variable speed drive 94 for vacuum pump 92 is preferably the type of adjustable speed drive used in electromechanical drive systems to control AC motor speed and torque by varying motor input frequency and/or voltage. Variable speed drives of the type represented by variable speed drive 94 are also sometimes called “adjustable frequency drives” or “variable speed drives” of “AC drives” or “microdrives” or “inverter drives.”
Variable speed drive 94 has three main subsystems: the vacuum pump drive motor, which is an AC motor; a main drive controller assembly; and a drive/operator interface, where microprocessor 200 functions as the operator.
Most desirably, the AC electric motor used to drive vacuum pump 92 and forming a portion of variable speed drive 94 is a three-phase induction motor; however, single phase motors can also be used, but three-phase motors are preferable. Synchronized motors may also be used, but three-phase induction motors are the most preferable for this invention.
The controller, parts of which are located within the variable speed drive housing 94, preferably includes a solid state power electronics conversion system, preferably including a rectifier bridge converter, a direct current link, and an inverter. The variable speed drive is desirably an AC-AC drive that converts AC line input into AC inverter output, all of which is controlled by microprocessor 200. It is also feasible to configure variable speed drive 94 as a DC-AC drive, in which case a required bridge rectifier converter for the variable speed drive is configured as a three-phase, 6 pulse, full wave, diode bridge. However, AC-AC drive is preferable. Some source inverter drives of the type which may be used as variable speed drive 94 provide higher power factors and lower harmonic distortion than phase controlled current source inverter drives or load commutator inverter drives. Most preferably, sinusoidal pulse width modulation is used to vary the drive motor voltage or current and frequency, thereby providing the control required for practice of the instant invention.
Preferably an embedded microprocessor present within drive 94 governs the overall operation of the variable speed drive controller, which in turn is a slave to microprocessor 200. Most desirably, basic programming of microprocessor 200 and the embedded microprocessor are both provided according to the user's specifications and desires. The embedded microprocessor for the variable speed drive within the variable speed drive unit 94 itself is most desirably user inaccessible. User programming of display portion of microprocessor 200 and variable and functional block parameters may be provided to control, protect and monitor the variable speed drive 94, the vacuum pump motor and any associated equipment. Typically, upstream of the basic variable frequency drive are circuit breakers or fuses, isolation contactors and EMC filters for reducing transfer of electromagnetic noise between a main power supply and the variable speed drive. Other and additional active and passive filters may also be incorporated.
The operator interface provided by microprocessor 200 provides a means for an operator to start and stop the vacuum pump motor and to adjust the operating speed of the motor. Additional operator control functions may include switching between manual speed adjustment and automatic control from an external process control signal such as a signal provided by one or more flow parameter sensors, or both, sensing one or more flow parameters within the resin conveying system, either or both upstream and downstream, from receiver(s) 16. An operator interface keypad and display (not illustrated in the drawings) may be provided on microprocessor 200. A keypad display of microprocessor 200 may be cable connected and mounted a short distance from the variable speed drive 94, or may be connected via the Internet for wireless communication with variable speed drive 94 from a remote locale. Variable speed drive 94 preferably includes a serial communications port, allowing the variable frequency drive to be configured, adjusted, monitored, and controlled using microprocessor 200.
Use of the variable speed drive saves energy over that required when operating an equivalent system directly from an AC power input line without a variable speed drive. The energy and cost savings are quite pronounced when a variable torque centrifugal fan or vacuum pump fan is used, where the load torque and required power vary with the square and cube respectively of the fan or impeller speed of the vacuum pump. Variable speed drive 94 provides a large power reduction as compared to fixed speed operation, with a relatively small reduction in speed being the penalty paid. Typically, a variable speed drive motor operating at 63% of full speed capacity consumes only about 25% of its full speed requirement for power.
Use of variable speed drive 94 brings about process and quality improvements in the system including better control over acceleration and speed of the pneumatic or vacuum powered resin stream; better control over the flow of vacuum or air downstream drawn through the receiver; and allows variation of flow rate according to monitoring provided by flow parameter sensors, as schematically represented by vacuum sensing gauge 22, with static and dynamic pressure, air speed, temperature, relative humidity and torque of the vacuum pump motor all being variables for input on which adjustments of the speed of the variable speed drive 94 and hence speed of vacuum pump 92 are made by microprocessor 200 and associated software.
A further advantage provided by variable speed drive 94 over fixed speed drives is that fixed speed drives require the vacuum pump motor to have a high starting torque and subject the motor to start-up current surges that are up to eight times the current consumption when the motor is operating at full speed. A variable speed drive such as drive 94 as disclosed herein does not start at a high starting torque but rather gradually ramps the motor of vacuum pump 92 up to an operating speed to lessen mechanical and electrical stress, thereby reducing maintenance and repair costs, and extending the life of the motor, the driven impeller or fan unit, and hence the entire resin conveying system.
Although schematic implementations of present invention and at least some of its advantages are described in detail hereinabove, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations may be made to the apparatus and methods disclosed herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of this patent application is not intended to be limited to the particular implementations of apparatus and methods described in the specification, nor to any methods that may be described or inferentially understood by those skilled in the art to be present as described in this specification.
As one of skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the invention as set forth hereinabove, apparatus, methods, and steps presently existing or later developed, which perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described and disclosed hereinabove, may be utilized according to the description of the invention and the claims appended hereto. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such apparatus, methods, and processes that provide the same result or which are, as a matter of law, embraced by the doctrine of the equivalents respecting the claims of this application.
As respecting the claims appended hereto, the term “comprising” means “including but not limited to”, whereas the term “consisting of” means “having only and no more”, and the term “consisting essentially of” means “having only and no more except for minor additions which would be known to one of skill in the art as possibly needed for operation of the invention.”
This patent application is a 35 USC 120 continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/829,283, filed 1 Dec. 2017, published as US 2018/0079604 on 22 Mar. 2018, the priority of the '283 patent application being claimed and asserted as a matter of law under 35 USC 120 by the continuation application. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/182,934 filed 15 Jun. 2016 published as US 2016/0297625 on 13 Oct. 2016, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,144,598, issued 4 Dec. 2018. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, claims the benefit of the priority of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/297,240 filed 19 Feb. 2016. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/185,016 filed 20 Feb. 2014 in the name of Stephen B. Maguire, entitled “Air Flow Regulator,” published 20 Aug. 2015 as United Stated patent publication 2015/0232287 A1, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,371,198. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/574,561 filed 18 Dec. 2014 in the name of Stephen B. Maguire, entitled “Resin Delivery System With Air Flow Regulator,” published 20 Aug. 2015 as United States patent publication 2015/0231801 A1, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,604,793. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/593,010 filed 9 Jan. 2015 in the name of Stephen B. Maguire, entitled “Air Flow Limiter with Closed/Open Sensing,” published 20 Aug. 2015 as United States patent publication 2015/0232289 A1, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,550,635. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/602,784 filed 22 Jan. 2015 in the name of Stephen B. Maguire, entitled “Method and Apparatus For Resin Delivery With Adjustable Air Flow Limiter,” published 20 Aug. 2015 as United States patent publication 2015/0232290 A1, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,550,636. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/804,404 filed 21 Jul. 2015 in the name of Stephen B. Maguire, entitled “Vacuum Powered Resin Loading System Without Central Control,” published 12 Nov. 2015 as United States patent publication 2015/0321806 A1, now abandoned. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/064,995 filed 14 Mar. 2016 in the names of James Zinski and Stephen B. Maguire and entitled “Resin Delivery Method and Apparatus Using Multiple Sensors for Optimal Vacuum Pump Operation,” now abandoned. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/066,157 filed 10 Mar. 2016 in the names of James Zinski and Stephen B. Maguire and entitled “Resin Delivery Apparatus and Method with Plural Air Flow Limiters” published 30 Jun. 2016 as United States patent publication 2016-0185538 A1, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,937,651. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims, under 35 USC 120, the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/392,650 filed 28 Dec. 2016 in the names of Steven B. Maguire and James Zinski, entitled “Granular Material Delivery System with Air Flow Limiter”, now abandoned. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims, under 35 USC 120, the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/470,065 filed 27 Mar. 2017 in the name of Steven B. Maguire, entitled “Self Controlled Vacuum Powered Granular Material Conveying and Loading System and Method,” now abandoned. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims, under 35 USC 120, the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/388,043 filed 22 Dec. 2016 in the name of Steven B. Maguire, entitled “Air Flow Limiter With Detector And Method For Limiting Air Flow” published 13 Apr. 2017 as United States patent publication 2017-0102716 A1, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,175,701. This patent application, through the co-pending '283 application and under 35 USC 120, also claims, under 35 USC 120, the benefit of the priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/387,863 filed 22 Dec. 2016 in the name of Steven B. Maguire, entitled “A Method For Adjustably Restricting Air Flow And Apparatus Therefor” published 13 Apr. 2017 as United States patent publication 2017-0101276 A1, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,280,015.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1001510 | Curbey | Aug 1911 | A |
1418096 | Royer | May 1922 | A |
1579251 | Schossow | Apr 1926 | A |
2116912 | Richardson | May 1938 | A |
2161190 | Paull | Jun 1939 | A |
2351035 | Grant, Jr. | Jun 1944 | A |
2403689 | Sprague | Jul 1946 | A |
2601654 | Wright | Jun 1952 | A |
2655934 | Charles | Oct 1953 | A |
2718435 | Hudspeth | Sep 1955 | A |
2765812 | Wallin | Oct 1956 | A |
2917077 | Ziege | Dec 1959 | A |
3077365 | Chester | Feb 1963 | A |
3111115 | Best | Nov 1963 | A |
3115276 | Johanningmeier | Dec 1963 | A |
3122162 | Sands | Feb 1964 | A |
3151628 | Heckert | Oct 1964 | A |
3164141 | Jones | Jan 1965 | A |
3209898 | Beebe et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3239278 | Mueller | Mar 1966 | A |
3348848 | Lucking et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3367362 | Hoffman | Feb 1968 | A |
3378310 | Christensen | Apr 1968 | A |
3381708 | Chenoweth | May 1968 | A |
3434493 | Owens | Mar 1969 | A |
3468338 | Patterson | Sep 1969 | A |
3470994 | Schnell et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3621873 | Kenann | Nov 1971 | A |
3667087 | Dakin | Jun 1972 | A |
3735777 | Katzer et al. | May 1973 | A |
3773065 | Mattox | Nov 1973 | A |
3773300 | Hauser | Nov 1973 | A |
3794077 | Fanshier | Feb 1974 | A |
3854778 | Trythall | Dec 1974 | A |
3861830 | Johnson | Jan 1975 | A |
3872884 | Busdiecker | Mar 1975 | A |
3931953 | Allen | Jan 1976 | A |
3951461 | De Feudis | Apr 1976 | A |
3959636 | Johnson et al. | May 1976 | A |
3985262 | Nauta | Oct 1976 | A |
4005908 | Freeman | Feb 1977 | A |
4026442 | Orton | May 1977 | A |
4108334 | Moller | Aug 1978 | A |
4148100 | Moller | Apr 1979 | A |
4174731 | Sturgis | Nov 1979 | A |
4183467 | Sheraton | Jan 1980 | A |
4219136 | Williams et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4221510 | Smith | Sep 1980 | A |
4262878 | O'ffill | Apr 1981 | A |
4269223 | Carter et al. | May 1981 | A |
4284261 | Benjamin | Aug 1981 | A |
4294020 | Evans | Oct 1981 | A |
4342443 | Wakeman | Aug 1982 | A |
4354622 | Wood | Oct 1982 | A |
4373838 | Foreman | Feb 1983 | A |
4402436 | Hellgren | Sep 1983 | A |
4402635 | Maruo | Sep 1983 | A |
4454943 | Moller | Jun 1984 | A |
4475672 | Whitehead | Oct 1984 | A |
4498783 | Rudolph | Feb 1985 | A |
4501518 | Smith | Feb 1985 | A |
4508091 | Wakeman | Apr 1985 | A |
4511291 | Quates, Sr. | Apr 1985 | A |
4525071 | Horowitz et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4581704 | Mitsukawa | Apr 1986 | A |
4586854 | Newman | May 1986 | A |
4705083 | Rossetti | Nov 1987 | A |
4750273 | Parkes | Jun 1988 | A |
4756348 | Moller | Jul 1988 | A |
4793711 | Ohlson | Dec 1988 | A |
4798516 | Jagst | Jan 1989 | A |
4812086 | Kopernicky | Mar 1989 | A |
4830508 | Higuchi et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834385 | Jackson | May 1989 | A |
4842198 | Chang | Jun 1989 | A |
4848534 | Sandwall | Jul 1989 | A |
4850703 | Hanaoka et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4962831 | Dundas | Oct 1990 | A |
4973202 | Becker | Nov 1990 | A |
4995422 | Chew | Feb 1991 | A |
5011043 | Whigham | Apr 1991 | A |
5054965 | Clark | Oct 1991 | A |
5110521 | Moller | May 1992 | A |
5116547 | Tsukahara et al. | May 1992 | A |
5132897 | Allenberg | Jul 1992 | A |
5143166 | Hough | Sep 1992 | A |
5147152 | Link | Sep 1992 | A |
5148943 | Moller | Sep 1992 | A |
5172489 | Moller | Dec 1992 | A |
5178652 | Huttlin | Jan 1993 | A |
5225210 | Shimoda | Jul 1993 | A |
5232314 | Hopkins | Aug 1993 | A |
5244179 | Wilson | Sep 1993 | A |
5252008 | May, III et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261743 | Moller | Nov 1993 | A |
5285930 | Nielsen | Feb 1994 | A |
5340949 | Fujimura et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341961 | Hausam | Aug 1994 | A |
5378089 | Law | Jan 1995 | A |
5415321 | Gehlert | May 1995 | A |
5423455 | Ricciardi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5561520 | Williams | Oct 1996 | A |
5575309 | Connell | Nov 1996 | A |
5575596 | Bauer | Nov 1996 | A |
5613516 | Landrum | Mar 1997 | A |
5622457 | Thiele | Apr 1997 | A |
5651401 | Cados | Jul 1997 | A |
5669265 | Adler | Sep 1997 | A |
5704391 | McGowan et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5767453 | Wakou et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767455 | Mosher | Jun 1998 | A |
5780779 | Kitamura et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791830 | Fort | Aug 1998 | A |
5794789 | Payson | Aug 1998 | A |
5843513 | Wilke et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6007236 | Maguire | Dec 1999 | A |
6036407 | Nester | Mar 2000 | A |
6070610 | Owler | Jun 2000 | A |
6076803 | Johnson | Jun 2000 | A |
6085777 | Welker | Jul 2000 | A |
6089794 | Maguire | Jul 2000 | A |
6102629 | Ishida | Aug 2000 | A |
6152656 | Curtis et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158363 | Memory et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6199583 | Iacovella | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227768 | Higuchi | May 2001 | B1 |
6379086 | Goth | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386800 | van Eyck | May 2002 | B1 |
6413020 | Davison | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419418 | Smith | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6447215 | Wellmar | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6497083 | Garwood | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6585004 | Porter | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6588988 | Zlotos | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6634375 | Olivas | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6644345 | Dulin | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648558 | Shultz | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6786681 | Grasshoff | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6834755 | Jay | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6871618 | Masse | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6890129 | Fabbri | May 2005 | B2 |
6923601 | Goth | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942133 | Frankeberger | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6981619 | Moretto | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7066689 | Maguire | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080960 | Burnett | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7114889 | Kanou | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7117886 | Kajitani | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137729 | Moretto | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7188434 | Moretto | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191807 | DeMaison | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192222 | Van Mullekom | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7231927 | Suehara | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7311474 | Ogasahara | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7318459 | Frankeberger | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7384018 | Moretto | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7472494 | Moretto | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7503128 | Moretto | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7662211 | Federico | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7766037 | Moenkhaus | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766305 | Kim | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8012313 | Carson | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8021462 | Moretto | Sep 2011 | B2 |
D650888 | Moretto | Dec 2011 | S |
8070844 | Maguire | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092070 | Maguire | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8113745 | Aoki | Feb 2012 | B2 |
D671563 | Moretto | Nov 2012 | S |
D671564 | Moretto | Nov 2012 | S |
8322951 | Kvalheim | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8360691 | Moretto | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8412383 | Moretto | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8408228 | Jimenez | Apr 2013 | B1 |
D688711 | Moretto | Aug 2013 | S |
8573896 | Relin | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8672194 | Moretto | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8753432 | Maguire | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8763273 | Moretto | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793900 | Moretto | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8794259 | Daneshgari | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8876439 | Sheehan | Nov 2014 | B2 |
D718791 | Moretto | Dec 2014 | S |
8905681 | Schneider | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914990 | Moretto | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8985987 | Shinohara | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9181044 | Baker | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9365367 | Kraemer | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9371198 | Maguire | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9440802 | Moretto | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9459183 | Schnakenberg | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9550635 | Maguire | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9550636 | Maguire | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9561915 | Kelly | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9604793 | Maguire | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9611106 | Tell | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9637320 | Moretto | May 2017 | B2 |
9663263 | Moretto | May 2017 | B2 |
9731914 | Rasner | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9758319 | Celella | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10227186 | De Jager | Mar 2019 | B2 |
20020061232 | Zlotos | May 2002 | A1 |
20020136609 | Maguire | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030168618 | Coney | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040115013 | Goth | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040221893 | Johnson | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050012058 | Medina | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050039816 | Maguire | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050089378 | Gerber | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050265793 | Van Mullekom | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080314461 | Moretto | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090031580 | Moretto | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090039106 | Moretto | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090090018 | Moretto | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090151800 | Salmento | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090295016 | Shinohara | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100080677 | Heinzen | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110097159 | Haberl | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110211919 | Rasner | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110299943 | Woolever | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120189413 | Richiger | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201917 | Shinohara | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120230779 | Dunstan | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120264200 | Hedrick | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130202370 | Moretto | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130209180 | Moretto | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150175282 | Thompson | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150232287 | Maguire | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150232288 | De Jager | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150232289 | Maguire | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150232290 | Maguire | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150308584 | Ehrne | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150321860 | Maguire | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160039553 | Akdogan | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160096693 | Hanaoka | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160106027 | Wilhelmi | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160158967 | Maguire | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160167897 | Wiemers | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160231754 | Kristoffersen | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160244275 | Maguire | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160272439 | Kelly | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160280473 | Veselov | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160292953 | Brown | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160347557 | Tell | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170174447 | Baker | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180281034 | Lavallee | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202302166 | Jul 2012 | CN |
3541532 | May 1986 | DE |
3923241 | Jan 1991 | DE |
4323295 | Feb 1995 | DE |
0318170 | May 1989 | EP |
0507689 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0587085 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0743149 | Nov 1996 | EP |
2109840 | May 1972 | FR |
2235775 | Jan 1975 | FR |
2517087 | May 1983 | FR |
203758 | Sep 1923 | GB |
271930 | Jun 1927 | GB |
2081687 | Feb 1982 | GB |
1235604 | Sep 1989 | JP |
4201522 | Jul 1992 | JP |
6114834 | Apr 1994 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Sheet of 2 photographs of Mould-Tek gravimetric blender, circa 1993. |
Sheet of 2 photographs of Motan gravimetric blender and feeding system with Maguire Products, Inc. controls, circa 1993. |
Sheet of 3 photographs of UNA-DYN gravimetric blender, circa 1993. |
Sheet of 2 photographs of Maguire Products, Inc. gravimetric blender with Conair hoppers and feeding system, circa 1993. |
Sheet of 1 photograph of Hydracolor gravimetric blender, circa 1993. |
Advertisement entitled “Machinery and Systems for Extrusion is Our Only Business” by Process Control Corporation, circa 1993. |
Advertisement entitled “Weigh Blender Delivers Unmatched Accuracy” by Universal Dynamics, Inc., circa 1993. |
Advertisement entitled “A Full Line-up of Blender Solutions . . . Priced Right” by HydReclaim, circla 1993. |
Advertisement entitled “New From HydReclaim—Now Processors Can Economically Achieve Continuous Gravimetric Blending” by HydReclaim, circa 1993. |
Article entitled “Control Loading Systems” from Plastics Technology, Oct. 1995, p. 41. |
Advertisement “Introducing our 400 VME-II Gravimetric Blender” by HydReclaim Corporation, circa 1993. |
Four page brochure entitled “Gravimix Better Quality through Research”, circa 1993. |
Four page brochure entitled “Conomix Plus Volumetric Blender” dated Aug. 1993. |
Four page brochure entitled “Conair Franklin Autocolor Y Mezclador” dated Mar. 1995. |
Two-sided flyer entitled “GB 140 Series Compact Auto Weigh Blender” published by Conair Franklin in the United States, Jun. 1994. |
Six page brochure entitled “Graviblend Precise Continuous Weigh Blenders” published by Ktron Vertech, Jun. 1991, United States. |
Six page brochure entitled “Piovan Gravimetric Blenders MDW” published by Piovan Sri, Oct. 1993, Venezia, Italy. |
One page two-sided flyer entitled “Gravimix, The New Gravimetric Blending Generation” published by Ferlin, De demsvaard, Holland, circa 1993. |
Four page brochure entitled “When you Weigh it All Up . . . ” published by Ferlin Trading, Holland, circa 1993. |
Thirty-two page catalog entitled “Maguire Color Blending Equipment” published by Maguire Products, Inc., 1993, United States. |
Two page brochure entitled “Mould-Tek Bulk Handling Systems” published by Mould-Tek Industries, Inc. in Canada, circa 1993. |
Brochure entitled “Plastic Molders and Extruders: published by Maguire Products, Inc., 1995”. |
Five page brochure entitled “Blending power: GXB Blender The Better Alternative” of Mould-Tek, circa 1998. |
Forty-four page two-sided brochure including cover and back pages entitled “Maguire: Auxiliary equipment for the plastics industry” of Maguire Products, Inc., Oct. 2000. |
Two-sided color brochure entitled “Convey, Blend, Dry” published by Novatec, Inc., undated. |
Three page two-sided color brochure entitled “Accuracy, flexibility and performance are at your fingertips with ConveyPacer III Series “S” Controller” of Mould-tek, 1999. |
Seven page two-sided color brochure plus cover entitled “Exac-U-Batch Series Weigh Scale Blenders: Engineered to be the ultimate blend of precision and control!” of Mould-tek, 2000. |
Three page two-sided color brochure entitled “We have the building blocks to integrate your entire plastics bulk handling system.” of Mould-tek, 1999. |
Two page two-sided color brochure entitled “Model GXB-2202 Exac-U-Batch Gravimetric Scale Blender: Accurate weigh scale blending under precise computer control” of Mould-tek, 2000. |
One page, two-sided color brochure entitled “Bulk handling power: the manufacturer of the world's most advanced blender gives you the same performance in bulk handling systems” of Mould-Tek, dated Apr. 1999. |
Three page two-sided color brochure entitled “Portable Drying and Conveying Systems: Nomad™ Series Portable Dryers”, AEC Whitlock, 1998. |
Two page two-sided color brochure entitled “Drying Systems: WD Series Dehumidifying Dryers” of AEC Whitlock, 1997. |
19 page document entitled “Model MLS—Clear Vu Eight Component Vacuum Loading System: Operation Manual” of Maguire Products, Inc. dated May 4, 1999. |
One page two-sided color brochure entitled “Maguire Clear-Vu™ Loading System” of Maguire Products, Inc. *. |
Four page two-sided color brochure entitled “Novatec Inc. Vacuum Loaders—Electro-Polished Stainless Steel Finish” of Novatec Inc., undated*. |
Eight page two-sided color brochure entitled “Novatec Inc. Material Conveying Solutions for the Plastics Industry”, 1999*. |
Two page two-sided color brochure entitled Maguire Model MPM Pre-Mixers of Maguire Products, Inc., Apr. 1997*. |
Two page two-sided color brochure entitled “WDMR Series Compact Dryers” of AEC Whitlock, 1998. |
Two page two-sided color reprint entitled “10 most frequently asked questions about Dryers” by Joseph Dziediz, AEC/Whitlock, from Plastics Technology, Jan. 1998. |
Two page two-sided color brochure entitled “Drying Systems: WD Series High Capacity Dehumidifying Dryers” of AEC Whitlock, 1997. |
Five page two-sided color brochure entitled “AEC Auxiliaries As Primary”, AEC, Inc., 1999. |
AEC Whitlock Operation and Installation Manual for VacTrac™ Series Conveying Systems, Single-Station Controllers, Oct. 30, 1997. |
Whitlock Turbo-Vac™ Vacuum Power Units Installation,k Operation and Maintenance Manual, 1984. |
AEC Whitlock Operation & Installation Manual—Continuous Vacuum/Pressure Conveying Systems, Single- and Dual-Blower Systems, Apr. 28, 1998. |
AEC Whitlock Operation and Installation Manual WD Series WD350 to WD3000 Dehumidifying Dryers with Fuzzy Logic Controls, Oct. 11, 1995. |
AEC Whitlock Operation and Installation Manual Nomad Series PD-2 to PD-4 Drying and Conveying Systems, Apr. 11, 1997. |
AEC Whitlock HE-CHE-BCHE Mass Flow Series Dying Hoppers, Dec. 17, 1997. |
Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/12411, dated Mar. 2, 2016. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/12411, dated Mar. 2, 2016. |
Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/19455, dated May 13, 2016. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/19455, dated May 13, 2016. |
Introduction to Pneumatic Conveying of Solids, Karl Jacob, The Dow Chemical Company, originally delivered on Sep. 8, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200277147 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62297240 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15829283 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16875233 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15182934 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 15829283 | US | |
Parent | 14185016 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 15182934 | US | |
Parent | 14574561 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 14185016 | US | |
Parent | 14593010 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 14574561 | US | |
Parent | 14602784 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 14593010 | US | |
Parent | 14804404 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 14602784 | US | |
Parent | 15064995 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 14804404 | US | |
Parent | 15066157 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 15064995 | US | |
Parent | 15392650 | Dec 2016 | US |
Child | 15066157 | US | |
Parent | 15470065 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 15392650 | US | |
Parent | 15388043 | Dec 2016 | US |
Child | 15470065 | US | |
Parent | 15387863 | Dec 2016 | US |
Child | 15388043 | US |