The present disclosure generally relates to a fluid control valve and, more particularly, to a flow path velocity modifier for a fluid control valve.
Fluid control devices include various categories of equipment including control valves and regulators. Such control devices are adapted to be coupled within a fluid process control system such as chemical treatment systems, natural gas delivery systems, etc., for controlling the flow of a fluid therethrough. Each control device defines a fluid flow-path and includes a control member for adjusting a dimension of the flow-path. For example,
The control member 24 is disposed within the upper and lower actuator casings 20, 22 and is adapted for bi-directional displacement in response to changes in pressure across the diaphragm subassembly 30. So configured, the control member 24 controls the flow of fluid through the throat 18. In some applications, a retainer 31 is secured to the bottom of the control member 24. The retainer 31 secures a sealing element 28 to the bottom of the control member 24. The retainer 31 includes a lower surface 33, distal to the control member 24 that has a generally convex shape, which extends outwardly beyond the sealing element 28, and past which the fluid flows when the regulator assembly 10 is in the open position. Additionally, the regulator assembly 10 includes a seat ring 26 disposed in the throat 18 of the valve body 12. When the outlet pressure of the valve body 12 is high, the sealing element 28 of the control member 24 may sealingly engage the seat ring 26 and close the throat 18. Similarly, absent any pressure in the actuator 14 or upon the failure of the diaphragm 32, a coil spring 34 disposed within an annular cavity portion 36 of the upper actuator casing 20 biases the control member 24 into the closed position. Such a regulator is commonly known as a “fail close” regulator. “Fail open” regulators operate similar to “fail closed” regulators; however, upon failure of the diaphragm, a spring biases the control member open, rather than closed.
Turning now to
Generally, valve sizing for a particular operation is determined such that the control member 24 will normally operate in the middle 80% of control member 24 travel for a majority of the operational time. By operating in the middle 80%, flow between the seat ring 26 and the sealing element 28 is predictable and smooth. However, in some cases, where a properly sized valve is not available, a valve that is larger than optimum may be used. In this case, the control member 24 and thus the sealing element 28 may operate a majority of the time relatively close to the seat ring 26, for example, within the closest 20% of the control member 24 travel to the seat ring 26, which can cause relatively high fluctuating flow velocities between the sealing element 28 and the seat ring 26 due to the formation of restricted flow areas. These high flow velocities can damage the relatively soft sealing element 28, which affects the shutoff capability of the control member 24.
A flow path velocity modifier allows a control member of a control valve to operate very close to a seat ring while reducing or eliminating restricted flow areas, which results in greatly reduced fluctuating flow velocities between the sealing element and the seat ring. As a result, sealing elements made of relatively soft materials may be used without fear of damage.
Turning now to
A retainer 131 having a body portion is secured to the bottom of a control member 124 by a plurality of fasteners 135. In some embodiments, other methods of securing the retainer 131 to the control member 124 may be used, such as, for example, interference fits, welds, adhesives, or other securing elements. The sealing element 128 is disposed between an upper surface 137 of the retainer 131 and a covering flange 139, which extends radially outward from the control member 124. The bottom surface 133 of the retainer 131 includes a first portion 133a, proximate a longitudinal axis A of the control member 124, the first portion 133a extending parallel to the longitudinal axis A of the control member 124 for a distance and a second portion 133b that angles radially upward, towards the sealing element 128 from the first portion 133a. Generally speaking, the second portion 133b is angled greater than 60 degrees with respect to the longitudinal axis A. In other words, an angle Z that is formed between the longitudinal axis A and the bottom surface of the second portion is greater than 60 degrees, preferably greater than 60 degrees but less than 90 degrees, and more preferably between 70 degrees and 80 degrees. Angles in these ranges optimize smoothing of the velocity fluctuations, and thus reduce damage to the sealing element 128.
A balance cavity 141 may extend through the retainer 131 in some cases where a balanced valve is desired. When a balance cavity 141 extends through the retainer, the first portion 133a may extend parallel to an edge 143 of the balance cavity 141, the first portion 133a forming a plug extension 145 that extends longitudinally outward, away from the control member 124. In some embodiments the plug extension may be substantially cylindrical in shape. The balance cavity 141 is a cylindrical opening having a longitudinal axis that is coincident with the longitudinal axis A of the control member 124. In other words, the retainer 131 has a longitudinal axis that is coincident with the longitudinal axis A.
The second surface 133b may extend away from the first surface 133a and towards the sealing element 128, meeting the sealing element 128 at a location L. When the control member 124 is in the closed position, a distance D may be formed between the location L and an inner surface 151 of the valve seat 126. In some embodiments, the distance D may be approximately 10% of the length of the second surface 133b. By leaving the distance D between the second surface 133b and the inner surface 151 of the valve seat 126, flow acceleration is reduced when the sealing element 128 is very close to the valve seat 126. As a result, flow velocities have reduced fluctuations (i.e., are smoothed) as the control member 124 moves towards the closed position, which reduces wear on the valve seat 126 and the sealing element 128.
In light of the foregoing, the description of the present disclosure should be understood as merely providing examples of the present invention and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1962520 | O'Malley | Jun 1934 | A |
2158737 | Wunsch | May 1939 | A |
2311009 | Urquhart | Feb 1943 | A |
2362438 | Marsh | Nov 1944 | A |
2601989 | Modes | Jul 1952 | A |
2969218 | Shaw | Jan 1961 | A |
3039488 | Bowerman | Jun 1962 | A |
3057372 | Sutton | Oct 1962 | A |
3409039 | Griffin | Nov 1968 | A |
3467357 | Weise | Sep 1969 | A |
3486528 | Frees | Dec 1969 | A |
4671490 | Kolenc | Jun 1987 | A |
5052435 | Crudup | Oct 1991 | A |
5123436 | Koechlein | Jun 1992 | A |
6811140 | Maini | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6935616 | Baumann | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20100078084 | Zuck | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0140510 | May 1985 | EP |
2188555 | May 2010 | EP |
985805 | Mar 1965 | GB |
2136540 | Sep 1984 | GB |
2222663 | Mar 1990 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Search Report for International application No. PCT/US2015/024805, mailed Jul. 8, 2015. |
Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/US2015/024805, mailed Jul. 8, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150285402 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61976828 | Apr 2014 | US |