Flow promoting ocular implant

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9763829
  • Patent Number
    9,763,829
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 12, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 19, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed are devices, methods and systems for treatment of eye disease, including open angle glaucoma and narrow angle glaucoma. Implants are described herein that create a directed flow field, such as between the anterior chamber and either the supraciliary space or suprachoroidal space. In addition, the implant can include a variety of features, including extruded features, such as rings and pegs, which can assist in preventing ocular tissue from collapsing onto the implant and occluding fluid pathways.
Description
BACKGROUND

The mechanisms that cause glaucoma are not completely known, though glaucoma has been linked to abnormally high pressure in the eye, which can lead to optic nerve damage. Over time, the increased pressure can cause damage to the optic nerve, which can lead to blindness. Treatment strategies have focused on keeping the intraocular pressure down in order to preserve as much vision as possible over the remainder of the patient's life.


Pursuant to such strategies, one or more implants can be delivered into the eye for shunting fluid out of the anterior chamber in order to regulate pressure in the eye. Accurate placement of an implant in the angle of the eye can be critical for the targeted effect of reducing intraocular pressure (IOP). Placing an implant too distally into the eye, such as too distally into the supraciliary space, may leave no portion of the implant remaining in the anterior chamber. This can inhibit aqueous outflow, as the fluid will not have a direct communication with the flow target location if there is no opening to the anterior chamber.


Conversely if the implant is placed too proximally in the supraciliary space such that a significant portion of the implant remains in the anterior chamber, damage to the corneal endothelium may result from implants that protrude upwards and touch the cornea. Implants placed too proximally may also touch the iris resulting in increased amounts of pigment dispersion in the eye, which can increase outflow resistance and intraocular pressure by clogging the trabecular meshwork. Therefore, correct placement of the implant is desired for a safe and a successful surgical outcome.


Additionally, in at least some instances, reduction in IOP can be correlated with forming one or more areas of separation between parts of the eye, such as between the choroid and sclera. These areas of separation can at least assist in allowing fluid to flow from the anterior chamber of the eye to the suprachoroidal space or supraciliary space. However, although creating separation between parts of the eye may be beneficial, creating larger incisions in the eye is generally not. For instance, a larger diameter implant may be able to create greater separation between parts of the eye, such as between the sclera and choroid, but a larger incision would be necessary which can result in excess tissue damage to the eye.


SUMMARY

Disclosed herein are devices and methods related to implants for treating one or more physiological conditions of the eye. Some device embodiments disclosed herein include an ocular implant for implanting in an eye, which can include an elongate tubular body comprising a proximal end, a distal end and an inner lumen extending at least partway between the proximal end and the distal end. In addition, the ocular implant can include a fenestration extending from an outer surface of the tubular body and intersecting with the inner lumen, and an extruded feature extending from the outer surface of the tubular body and positioned adjacent the fenestration.


Some system embodiments disclosed herein include an implant delivery system including an implant configured for implantation into an eye where the implant can have an elongate tubular body including a proximal end, a distal end and an inner lumen extending at least partway between the proximal end and the distal end. In addition, the implant can include a fenestration extending from an outer surface of the tubular body and intersecting with the inner lumen, and an extruded feature extending from the outer surface of the tubular body and positioned adjacent the fenestration. Additionally, the delivery system can include a delivery device configured to insert the implant into the eye.


Some method embodiments disclosed herein include implanting an implant in an eye, with the method including securing an implant to a delivery device configured to insert the implant into the eye. In addition, the implant can include an elongate tubular body including a proximal end, a distal end and an inner lumen extending at least partway between the proximal end and the distal end. Additionally, the implant can include a fenestration extending from an outer surface of the tubular body and intersecting with the inner lumen, and an extruded feature extending from the outer surface of the tubular body and positioned adjacent the fenestration. The method can further include inserting the implant into the eye.


The details of one or more variations of the subject matter described herein are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages of the subject matter described herein will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other aspects will now be described in detail with reference to the following drawings.



FIG. 1 shows an example cross-sectional view of a portion of the human eye.



FIG. 2 shows and an example cross-sectional perspective view of a portion of the eye showing a part of the anterior and posterior chambers of the eye and a schematic representation of an embodiment of an implant positioned inside the eye such that a proximal end is located in the anterior chamber and a distal end communicates with and/or is located in or near the supraciliary space.



FIG. 3A illustrates a side view of an embodiment of an ocular implant having a tubular body with an inner lumen and at least one fenestration.



FIG. 3B illustrates a cross-section view of the implant in FIG. 3A showing the fenestrations in fluid communication with the inner lumen.



FIG. 4A illustrates an embodiment of an implant having a variety of shaped and sized extruded features, including extruded rings and pegs.



FIG. 4B shows an enlarged section view of the implant in FIG. 4A showing the position of the pegs adjacent fenestrations for assisting in preventing occlusion of the fenestrations.



FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of an implant having an extruded feature configured as a large proximal ring.



FIG. 6A illustrates an embodiment of an implant having a plurality of micro-channels.



FIG. 6B shows an enlarged section view of the implant in FIG. 6A showing a proximal end of the implant which can have one or more fenestrations or micro-channels extending through a proximal outer wall of the implant.



FIG. 7A illustrates an embodiment of an implant having a beveled proximal end.



FIG. 7B shows an enlarged section view of the implant in FIG. 7A showing the beveled proximal end and a main inlet port.



FIG. 8A illustrates an embodiment of an implant having a wave-cut proximal end including at least one fenestration adjacent the proximal end of the implant.



FIG. 8B shows an enlarged section view of the implant in FIG. 7A showing the wave-cut proximal end with at least one fenestration adjacent the proximal end of the implant.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of an implant including stabilizing features and a receiving port for receiving one or more drugs.



FIG. 10 shows an embodiment of a delivery system, including a delivery device configured to deliver an ocular implant into an eye.



FIG. 11 shows an enlarged view of the delivery system of FIG. 10 showing the ocular implant mounted on a delivery component of the delivery device.



FIG. 12 shows an enlarged view of a section of an eye with an implant mounted on a guidewire approaching an implantation site from an anterior chamber of the eye.





Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

This disclosure describes methods and devices related to implanting an ocular implant into an eye for promoting fluid flow within the eye in order to treat a variety of diseases and ailments of the eye, including open angle glaucoma and narrow angle glaucoma. Some device embodiments described herein include ocular implants which are compact enough such that they do not require a large incision for implantation but can provide improved separation between one or more parts of the eye, such as between the sclera and choroid.


At least some embodiments of the ocular implant disclosed herein are configured to assist in promoting fluid flow from the anterior chamber of the eye to either the suprachoroidal space or the supraciliary space. In addition, the ocular implants can include a variety of features, including extruded features and fenestrations, which can assist in promoting fluid flow at least through the implant.



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of the human eye. The eye is generally spherical and is covered on the outside by the sclera S. The retina lines the inside posterior half of the eye. The retina registers the light and sends signals to the brain via the optic nerve. The bulk of the eye is filled and supported by the vitreous body, a clear, jelly-like substance. The elastic lens L is located near the front of the eye. The lens L provides adjustment of focus and is suspended within a capsular bag from the ciliary body CB, which contains the muscles that change the focal length of the lens. A volume in front of the lens L is divided into two by the iris I, which controls the aperture of the lens and the amount of light striking the retina. The pupil is a hole in the center of the iris through which light passes. The volume between the iris and the lens is the posterior chamber PC. The volume between the iris and the cornea is the anterior chamber AC. Both chambers are filled with a clear liquid known as aqueous humor.


The ciliary body continuously forms aqueous humor in the posterior chamber by secretion from the blood vessels. The aqueous humor flows around the lens and iris into the anterior chamber and exits the eye through the trabecular meshwork, a sieve-like structure situated at the corner of the iris and the wall of the eye (the corner is known as the iridocorneal angle or the angle). Some of the aqueous humor can filter through the trabecular meshwork near the iris root into Schlemm's canal, a small channel that drains into the ocular veins. A smaller portion rejoins the venous circulation after passing through the ciliary body and eventually through the sclera (i.e., the uveoscleral route).



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional, perspective view of a portion of the eye showing the anterior and posterior chambers of the eye. A schematic representation of an embodiment of an implant 10 is shown positioned inside the eye such that a proximal end 12 is located in the anterior chamber and a distal end 14 communicates with and/or is located in or near the supraciliary space. In another embodiment, the distal end 14 is located in the suprachoroidal space. It should be appreciated that FIG. 1 and other figures herein are schematic and are not necessarily to scale with respect to size and relative positions of actual eye tissue.


The ocular implants disclosed herein can provide a fluid pathway between at least the anterior chamber and either the supraciliary space or suprachoroidal space. For example, the implant can include a distal end that can be positioned in the supraciliary space or the suprachoroidal space. The implant may be positioned at least partially between the ciliary body and the sclera or it may be at least partially positioned between the sclera and the choroid. The distal end of the implant may be positioned between other anatomical parts of the eye.


In some embodiments, the implant can include an elongated tubular body having one or more internal lumens through which aqueous humor can flow, such as from the anterior chamber into either the suprachoroidal or supraciliary space. The implant can have a substantially uniform internal diameter along its entire length, although the shape of the implant can vary, such as along its length. Alternatively, the implant can have a variable internal diameter along its length. Moreover, the implant can have various cross-sectional shapes, such as a circular, oval or rectangular shape, and can vary in cross-sectional shape moving along its length. For example, the cross-sectional shape can be selected to facilitate easy insertion into the eye.


The internal lumen of the implant can serve as a passageway for the flow of aqueous humor through the implant directly from the anterior chamber toward or into the suprachoroidal space or supraciliary space. In addition, the internal lumen of the implant can be used as an access location to mount the implant onto a delivery system. The internal lumen can also be used as a pathway for flowing fluid, such as an irrigation fluid or a visco-elastic substance, into the eye for flushing or to maintain pressure in the anterior chamber, or using the fluid to assist in dissection, visualization or hydraulic creation of a dissection plane into or within the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space. Fluid can be flowed toward or into either the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space, for example via a delivery cannula or through the internal lumen of the shunt. The fluid can be flowed into the eye with a pressure sufficient to form a dissection plane into or within the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space. The fluid can accumulate within the eye so as to form a lake. In general, hydro-dissection or the injection of fluids such as visco-elastic substances can be used to separate the ciliary body from the sclera to enlarge an area of detachment of the ciliary body from the sclera with or without insertion of a device.


In at least some instances reduction in IOP can be correlated with the position of the implant which creates an area of separation between the choroid and sclera around at least a part of the implant (also known as “tenting”) and a space created around, for example, the most distal portion of the implant (also known as an “aqueous lake”). In addition, increasing the area of scleral and choroidal separation can improve IOP reduction in at least some instances.


Although increasing the area of scleral and choroidal separation can be advantageous, several drawbacks can occur if a lager implant, such as an implant larger than approximately 0.5-1.0 mm in diameter, is used to create the larger separation. For example, some drawbacks may include the requirement for a larger incision, such as along the limbus, due to a greater diameter implant. A larger incision may cause fluids to escape the eye, such as at least from the anterior chamber, and complicate the implantation procedure. For example, an incision less than 2.5 mm may be preferable for implantation of at least one implant.


Other drawbacks to using a larger diameter implant can include creating a larger cyclodialysis which may result in increased rates of hypotony post operatively and increased rates of retinal detachments. In addition, a larger implant can be more difficult to insert into the supraciliary and suprachoroidal space due to the requirement of greater tissue separation which may result in excess tissue damage. Therefore, an implant which is sized such that it does not require a large incision (such as less than 2.5 mm) and can promote the flow of aqueous fluid from the anterior chamber of the eye to the suprachoroidal space or supraciliary space may overcome the drawbacks discussed above while achieving an improved reduction in IOP.


The present disclosure includes various embodiments of ocular implants, such as implants which include a tubular structure having at least one inner lumen which extends through the length of the implant. For example, the proximal end can be configured to be positioned in the eye such that it allows aqueous fluid to flow into the inner lumen of the implant. The distal end of the implant can be configured and positioned in the eye such that it allows aqueous fluid to flow out of the implant. In addition, the proximal and distal end of the implant can include features that assist in promoting fluid flow through the implant and protect the eye from damage.


Additionally, either the proximal end or distal end of the implant can be radiused or chamfered in order to protect the eye from damage, such as from sharp edges. For example, at least one of the distal end and proximal end of the implant can be radiused or chamfered for promoting smooth insertion and interaction with surrounding tissue which can assist in minimizing cyclodialysis. Alternatively or in addition, either the proximal end or distal end of the implant can include features which assist in preserving or promoting fluid flow through the implant. For example, the proximal end or distal end can include a beveled or wave cut tip which can assist in preventing at least surrounding tissue from occluding the inner lumen and preventing fluid flow through the implant. Any number of a variety of proximal end or distal end shapes can be included in an implant implementation for assisting in preserving or promoting fluid flow through the implant.


Some implementations of the implant can include at least one fenestration. Any one fenestration can be placed anywhere along the implant, including at the proximal end, distal end, or along the length of the implant, for assisting in fluid flow through the implant. In addition, the fenestrations can have any number of a variety of sizes and shapes and can be arranged in any number of a variety of patterns along the implant. For example, the size of the fenestrations can increase distally which can assist in promoting fluid flow in the distal direction relative to the implant. Alternatively or in addition, the number of fenestrations can increase in the distal direction along the length of the implant, such that there are more fenestrations adjacent the distal end, which can also assist in promoting distal fluid flow.


Furthermore, one or more fenestrations can be in the shape of a channel which can extend along the length of the implant. More than one channel can extend along the distal end of the implant and form, for example, a bifurcated or trifurcated configuration. In addition, the channels can widen in the distal direction along the implant. Any of a variety of sized and shaped fenestrations positioned at one or more locations along the implant can assist in creating a pressure gradient which can promote distally directed flow in order to increase fluid flow through the implant in the distal direction and reduce IOP.


Some implementations of the implant can include one or more extruded features, such as for assisting fluid flow into one or more fenestrations. For example, one or more extruded pegs or rings can be positioned adjacent or near one or more fenestrations, including the main inlet and outlet port of the implant. The extruded features, such as the extruded pegs or rings, can assist in preventing surrounding tissue from blocking or occluding the fenestrations which can allow the implant to efficiently and effectively promote fluid flow through the implant and reduce IOP.


Alternatively or in addition, one or more features can be indented into the body of the implant for assisting with fluid flow through the implant. Any number of a variety of shaped and sized features, both indented and extruded, can be included in an implant for assisting with fluid flow through the implant, such as by preventing at least surrounding tissue from blocking or occluding one or more fenestrations.


In some embodiments, the implant can include a lumen which is partially or completely occluded with a bioabsorbable material. The bioasborbable material can be comprised of, for example, a polylactic acid (PLA), polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), any combination of these materials, or any other suitable degradable material. The bioabsorbable material can be configured to block the flow of fluid through the lumen during a post-operative period, such as, for example, the first week, first several weeks or first several months after implantation. The bioabsorbable material can assist in preventing tissue growth in the lumen of the implant during the post-operative period when foreign body reaction and inflammation may be highest. After a period of time, the bioabsorbable material may erode away and the lumen of the implant may become patent and allow fluid to flow through the lumen.


In some embodiments, the bioabsorbable material can be molded onto either end of the implant, such as like a cap. Alternatively, the bioabsorbable material may be filled through the entire lumen of the implant at a temperature above the melting temperature of the bioabsorbable material and then allowed to cool and form within the lumen. In addition, the bioabsorbable material may fill through any number of channels or cavities within the implant.


In addition, some extruded features, such as extruded pegs or rings, can assist in maintaining the implant in a desired location within the eye. For example, at least one extruded ring can be positioned along the length of the implant, such as at either the proximal or distal end of the implant, which can assist in retaining the implant in a desired location. By preventing migration of the implant after implantation in the eye, the implant can be prevented from causing damage to the eye and can work efficiently and effectively to reduce IOP.


Additionally, any one or more extruded feature can assist in providing tenting around one or more parts of the implant, including around at least one fenestration. The size, shape and positioning relative to one or more fenestrations (e.g., adjacent to one or more fenestrations) can affect the tenting effect and resulting fluid flow through the implant. Therefore, the extruded features can include any number of a variety of sizes, shapes and positions along the implant in order to achieve desired tenting effects and fluid flow through the implant.


Furthermore, some extruded features can be sized, shaped and positioned along the implant in order to assist in positioning the implant in the eye. For example, an extruded feature can include a larger diameter proximal extruded ring which can provide a hard stop during implantation. This can assist a user, such as a clinician, in determining the proper positioning of the implant and can assist in preventing over-insertion of the implant.


The implant can be made out of any number of medical grade materials, including at least one of stainless steel, polyimide, or other plastics and metal materials. Alternatively or in addition, the implant can be made out of any number of shape memory alloys, such as nitinol, or shape memory polymers. However, any number of medical grade materials may be used.


In addition, the implant can be coated with a drug, such as mitomycin or 5-FU which can be used, for example, in trabeculectomy surgeries in order to reduce fibrotic and inflammatory tissue response. One or more drugs can be adhered to the surface of the implant. Alternatively or in addition, the one or more drugs may be combined with a polymer comprising at least a part of the implant for a sustained release profile.



FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate an embodiment of an ocular implant 20 having a tubular body with an inner lumen 21 which can extend through the length of the implant 20. In addition, the implant 20 can include at least one fenestration 23 along the length of the implant 20. The fenestrations 23 can provide a fluid passageway between one or more areas surrounding the implant 20 and the inner lumen 21 of the implant 20. Additionally, the fenestrations 23 can assist in promoting fluid flow through the implant 20, such as aqueous fluid, in order to reduce IOP.


For example, the fenestrations 23 can provide additional fluid passageways through the implant 20 other than though a main outlet port 25 at the distal end of the implant 20 or a main inlet port 26 at the proximal end of the implant 20. In addition, in the event either the main outlet port 25 or the main inlet port 26 of the implant 20 is occluded, the fenestrations 23 can provide alternate fluid passageways for fluid flowing through the implant 20, such as aqueous fluid flowing from the anterior chamber into the suprachoroidal space or supraciliary space.


Any number of fenestrations 23, which can vary in shape and size, can be positioned anywhere along the length of the implant 20. Additionally, the density of fenestrations 23 along the length of the implant 20 can vary. For example, more fenestrations 23 may be positioned near the distal end of the implant 20 than near the proximal end. As shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, the number of fenestrations can increase distally along the implant 20. By increasing the number of fenestrations 23 along the implant 20 in the distal direction, distally directed fluid flow through the implant 20 can be promoted, such as by the formation of a pressure gradient. For example, this can be beneficial when the proximal end of the implant is positioned in the anterior chamber and the distal end is positioned in the suprachoroidal or supraciliary space for treatment of an eye having high IOP.


Additionally, as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, the fenestrations 23 can increase in size along the length of the implant 20. More specifically, the fenestrations 23 can increase in diameter as they are positioned closer to the distal end of the implant 20. Increasing the size of the fenestrations 23 in the distal direction along the length of the implant 20 can assist in creating a pressure gradient, which can promote distally directed flow. The implant 20 can have any number of a variety of sized and shaped fenestrations along the length of the implant 20 that can assist in promoting fluid flow through the implant 20, including promoting a distally directed fluid flow.


Therefore, by either increasing the number of fenestrations or the size of the fenestrations along a length of the implant in the distal direction, distally directed flow can be promoted through the implant 20 without having to increase either the inner diameter or outer diameter of the implant 20. This can allow the implant 20 to maintain a smaller diameter, which can be beneficial at least during implantation, while providing one or more fluid passageways that aggregately provide improved fluid flow between at least the proximal end and distal end of the implant.


In addition, FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate an ocular implant 20 having one or more extruded features configured as rings 28 extending from the outer surface of the implant 20. The rings 28 can provide additional separation between the tissue surrounding the implant 20, such as the choroid and sclera. The rings 28 can assist in creating additional space, also known as tenting, which can promote fluid flow through the implant and reduce IOP without requiring the entire length of the implant 20 to increase in diameter. The tenting effect provided by the rings 28 can assist in preventing surrounding tissue from occluding the fenestrations 23. Occlusion of the fenestrations can reduce fluid flow through the implant 20 which can hinder the implant 20 from assisting with reducing IOP. For example, the one or more extruded features can improve fluid flow, such as by tenting, and minimize the potential for sclera or choroidal occlusion of the fenestrations 23 which can more effectively reduce IOP.


In some implementations, one or more rings 28 can be positioned at or near the distal end of the implant 20 for assisting in preventing occlusion of the more distally positioned fenestrations 23. In addition, one or more rings 28 can be positioned at or near the proximal end of the implant 20 for assisting in preventing occlusion and providing additional retention. Extruded features, such as rings 28, positioned along the implant 20, both proximally and distally, can provide additional retention of the implant 20 which can ensure against migration of the implant 20 after implantation. The size and shape of the rings 28 may vary and any number of rings 28 can extend along the length of an implant 20.



FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate an embodiment of an implant 100 having a variety of shaped and sized extruded features. The implant 100 includes at least one ring 28 along the length of the implant, such as near the proximal end for at least providing retention of the implant 20 in the eye after implantation. In addition, the implant 100 includes at least one peg 32 along the length of the implant 20, such as near the distal end of the implant for at least assisting in efficient fluid flow through the implant 100 (i.e., by assisting in creating either a tenting effect or an aqueous lake). As with any extruded feature, the pegs 32 can vary in size and shape, including along the length of the implant 100.



FIG. 4A shows the pegs 32 increasing in diameter in the distal direction along the length of the implant 100. This configuration can assist in providing an increase in either tenting or aqueous lake effects, which can assist in promoting distally directed flow through the implant 100. The fenestrations 23 positioned along the implant 100 are also shown as distally increasing in diameter along the length of the implant which can also assist in promoting distally directed fluid flow through the implant 100, such as by creating a pressure gradient.


As shown in FIG. 4B, the extruded features, such as the pegs 32, can be positioned directly adjacent fenestrations 23 which can allow the extruded features to assist in preventing occlusion of the fenestrations 23 by pushing surrounding tissue away from the fenestrations 23. In addition, the extruded features, such as the pegs 32, can vary in height in order to provide a variety of tenting effects. Additionally, any number of a variety of features can be included to assist in creating a tenting effect, such as a sheath or cage which can expand around the fenestrations, without departing from the scope of this disclosure.



FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of an implant 200 having an extruded feature configured as a large proximal ring 34. The large proximal ring 34 can be a large extruded feature, such as a ring, and positioned proximally in order to assist a user, such as a clinician, with properly inserting the implant 200. For example, the large proximal ring 34 can be used as a reference hard stop for placement of the implant 200 which can assist in preventing over-insertion of the implant 200. Improperly placed implants can at least cause either damage to the eye or prevent the implant from performing efficiently and effectively. Therefore, the large proximal ring 34 can be beneficial in assisting a clinician with properly placing the implant 200 for allowing the implant 200 to efficiently and effectively reduce IOP without causing significant damage to the eye.


As shown in FIG. 5, the large proximal ring 34 can include at least one cutout 35. The cutout 35 can be oriented to face the iris when the implant 200 is implanted in the eye. This can allow the cutout 35 to at least minimize contact between the implant 200, such as the large ring 34, and the iris. In addition, the implant 200 can also include one or more extruded features, such as rings 28, and fenestrations 23 for at least assisting in promoting fluid flow through the implant, including distally directed fluid flow.



FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate an embodiment of an implant 300 having a multitude of micro-channels 36. The micro-channels 36 can have a small diameter, such as no greater than microns, and can provide a mechanism for allowing fluid transport through the implant 300. The micro-channels 36 can run either axially along the length of the implant or radially along the length of the implant 300 which can form a meshwork of micro-channels 36. In some embodiments, the micro-channels 36 which make up the meshwork of micro-channels 36 can vary in size and shape.


In some embodiments, micro-channels 36 can be sized and configured such that they restrict fluid flow through the micro-channels 36 similar to a valve. For example, when the pressure in the anterior chamber drops below 12 mmHg the micro-channels 36 can at least reduce the amount of fluid flow through the micro-channel lumens, including preventing fluid flow altogether. By at least reducing the amount of fluid flow through the micro-channels 36 when pressure drops in the anterior chamber, the implant 300 can assist in preventing the eye from becoming hypotonous. By way of further example, when the pressure in the anterior chamber is above 12 mmHg, fluid can be allowed to flow through the micro-channels 36, such as to assist in reducing IOP.


The micro-channels 36 can increase in size from the proximal end to the distal end of the implant 300, which can assist in promoting distally directed fluid flow. Alternatively or in addition, one or more fenestrations 28 or micro-channels 36 that are larger in diameter can be placed at or near the middle portion of the implant 300 where an increase in tenting can occur.


In some embodiments, the micro-channels 36 or fenestrations 28 of the implant 300 can either form or intercept a bifurcated or trifurcated configuration at the distal end of the implant 300. The bifurcated or trifurcated configuration at the distal end of the implant 300 can assist in reducing pressure at the bifurcated or trifurcated locations and promote distally directed flow through the implant 300. Any number of fenestration 28 or micro-channel configurations can be implemented in an implant without departing from the scope of this disclosure.



FIG. 6B shows the proximal end of the implant 300 which can have one or more fenestrations 28 or micro-channels 36 extending through a proximal outer wall of the implant 300. The implant 300 can also include a distal outer wall having either one or more fenestrations 28 or micro-channels 36 extending therethrough.


As shown in at least FIGS. 3A-6B, at least one of the proximal end and distal end of the implant can have either a radiused edge 38 or chamfered edge 39. The radiused edges 38 and chamfered edges 39 can assist in inserting the implants into the eye and preventing damage to the at least during and after implantation of the implant in the eye. Any one implant can include any one of a variety of shaped and sized radiused edge 38 or chamfered edge 39, including along any extruded feature, proximal end or distal end, for at least assisting with implanting the implant and preventing damage to the eye without departing from the scope of this disclosure.



FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of an implant 400 having a beveled 40 proximal end. The bevel 40 can be oriented such that the elliptical face of the bevel 40 can face away from the iris in order to at least minimize occlusion of the main inlet port 26, such as by the iris. The beveled 40 proximal end can also include at least one micro-channel 36 or fenestration 28 similar to the embodiment described in FIGS. 6A and 6B. In addition, although shown as having only a beveled 40 proximal end, any one implant can have either a beveled 40 proximal end or a beveled 40 distal end.



FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate an embodiment of an implant 500 having a wave-cut 42 proximal end including at least one fenestration 28 adjacent the proximal end of the implant 500. At least one of the wave-cut 42 proximal end and fenestrations 28 can assist in preventing occlusion of the proximal end of the implant 500, such as by the iris or surrounding tissue. Additionally, the fenestrations 28 adjacent the proximal end of the implant 500 can provide another inlet for aqueous fluid to enter the implant 500, such as in the event the main inlet port 26 is occluded. The wave-cut 42 proximal end and proximal fenestrations 28 can be included in any implant embodiment for at least assisting in fluid flow through the proximal end of the implant.



FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of an implant 600 including a receiving port 44 for receiving one or more drugs, such as drugs for reducing fibrotic and inflammatory tissue response. For example, the one or more drugs can be released by the implant 600 into the eye, such as during and after implantation of the implant 600 in the eye. The receiving port 44 can be positioned anywhere along the implant 600, including the middle portion, as shown in FIG. 9. The position of the receiving port 44 along the implant 600 can depend on a number of factors, including where the one or more drugs received by the receiving port 44 are to be dispensed from the implant 600. In addition, the position of the receiving port 44 along the implant 600 can depend on the availability of the receiving port 44 to be accessed by a clinician either during or after implantation of the implant 600 for delivering one or more drugs to the receiving port 44. It can be beneficial to position the receiving port 44 along the implant 600 in order to allow a needle to locate the receiving port 44 and properly deliver one or more drugs to the receiving port 44, such as while the implant 600 is at least partially implanted in the eye.


Some method embodiments can include one or more time points after implantation of the implant 600 at which time the physician can locate the receiving port 44 of the implant 600, such as via an ab externo approach, in order to deliver one or more drugs or other substances to the implant 600. For example, the physician can use a needle or other delivery device to pierce across the sclera and into the implant 600, such as into the receiving port 44. The physician can then deliver one or more drugs or other substances through the receiving port 44 and into the implant 600. The implant 600 can then deliver the one or more drugs or other substances to the eye, such as to the suprachoroidal space. For example, one or more intraocular or intravitreal medications can be delivered to the implant 600, such as via the receiving port 44, at regular or defined time intervals (e.g., once a week, once a month, once every 10 days, etc.).


In some implementations, the implant 600 can include one or more stabilization features, such as wings 46, as shown in FIG. 9. The stabilization features, such as the wings 46, can assist in orienting and maintaining the implant 600 in position relative to its implantation site. This can assist in allowing the receiving port 44 to be accessible, such as with a needle, while the implant 600 is at least partially implanted in the eye. In some implementations, the receiving port 44 can be color coded or marked in such a way that allows a clinician to locate the receiving port. For example, the receiving port 44 can be made out of a radio-opaque material or any material that allows viewing of the material with one or more medical equipment, such as x-ray or ultrasound, for locating the receiving port and properly delivering one or more drugs into the receiving port 44.


The features and profiles of the implants described herein can be formed by one or more of a variety of manufacturing methods. For example, the implant can be formed by laser cutting a tube made out of a medical grade material, such as those discussed above. In addition, the implant can be injection molded. The implant can vary in dimensions in order to accommodate various sized implantation sites and applications. For example, the implant can be approximately 0.15 to 0.35 inches in length, and the extruded features, including rings, can have an outer diameter of approximately 0.010 to 0.030 inches and a length of approximately 0.002 to 0.008 inches. In addition, the large proximal ring can have an outer diameter of approximately 0.01 to 0.03 inches and a length of approximately 0.005 to 0.015 inches. Additionally, the implant body can have an outer diameter of approximately 0.012 to 0.022 inches and an inner diameter of approximately 0.008 to 0.018 inches. Furthermore, the fenestrations can have a diameter of approximately 0.001 to 0.008 inches. The distal end can have a radius of approximately 0.001 to 0.003 inches and the proximal end can have a radius of approximately 0.001 to 0.003 inches.


In addition, a delivery system can be used to deliver an implant 20, including at least implants 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 described herein, into the eye in order to allow the implant 20 to at least provide fluid communication between the anterior chamber and the suprachoroidal or supraciliary space. FIG. 10 shows an embodiment of a delivery system 50 that can be used to deliver the implant 20 into the eye. It should be appreciated that the delivery systems 50 described herein provide some examples, and variations in the structure, shape and actuation of the delivery system 50 are possible.


The delivery system 50 can include a proximal handle component 52 and a distal delivery component 54. The proximal handle component 52 can include an actuator 56, such as a button, to control the release of an implant 20 from the delivery component 54 into the target location in the eye. In addition, the actuator 56 can vary in structure.


An embodiment of the delivery component 54 can include an elongate applier in the form of a guidewire 58 that inserts longitudinally through an internal lumen 21 of the implant 10 and a “stopper” or sheath 60 positioned axially over the guidewire 58. The sheath 60 can aid in the release of the implant 20 from the delivery component 54 into the target location in the eye. The actuator 56 can be used to control movement or relative movement of the guidewire 58 and/or the sheath 60. For example, the sheath 60 can be fixed relative to the handle component 52 and act as a stopper that impedes the implant 20 from moving in a proximal direction as the guidewire 58 is withdrawn proximally from the implant 20 upon actuation of the actuator 56. In a first state, the guidewire 58 can be extended distally relative to the sheath 60. Actuation of the actuator 56, such as by pressing the actuator 56, can cause the guidewire 58 to slide proximally into the sheath 60. This can effectively disengage the implant 20 off the distal end of the guidewire 58 and releases the implant 20 in a controlled fashion such that the target positioning of the implant 20 is maintained.



FIG. 11 shows an enlarged view of an implant 20 mounted on a delivery component 54 for inserting the implant 20 into the eye. The implant 20 can be mounted on a distal region of a guidewire 58. The sheath 60 can be sized and shaped to receive or abut a portion of the proximal end of the implant 20. In this embodiment, upon actuation of the actuator 56, the guidewire 58 can slide in the proximal direction (arrow P) into the sheath 60. The proximal end of the implant 20 can abut the distal edge of the sheath 60 to prevent the implant 20 from sliding in the proximal direction. This can effectively disengage the implant 20 off the distal end of the guidewire 58 and controllably release the implant 20 into the eye tissue.


The delivery system 50 can also assist in providing fluid delivery into the eye during or after implantation of the implant 20. The delivered fluid can vary and can include a viscoelastic, drugs, stem cells, or a combination thereof. The delivery of the implant 20 can be in combination with retinal or macula therapy. A fluid delivery feature can include an elongated tube 80 that extends outward from the handle 52. The tube 80 can extend through the handle 52 and can have an internal lumen that communicates at a distal end with the proximal end of an internal lumen in the guidewire 58. One or more outlet openings, such as slots 70, can be located on the distal region of the guidewire 58. The tube 80 can be connected at a proximal end to a source of fluid so as to provide a pathway for the fluid to be delivered to the internal lumen of the guidewire via the tube 80. The fluid can then exit the guidewire via the slots 70 for delivery into the eye.


In alternate embodiments the fluid may be delivered to other sections along the axial length of the implant 20. Fenestrations or holes along the length of the implant 20 may be configured to be sufficiently large such that a fluid may be delivered through corresponding holes along the guidewire 58 and into the eye, such as into the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space surrounding the body of the implant 20, which can depend on where the implant 20 is positioned and the length of the implant 20. This can be advantageous because it can create additional space surrounding the implant 20 and improve tenting.


An embodiment of a method of delivering and implanting the implant 20 into the eye includes at least the following description. In general, one or more implants 20 can be slideably loaded on a delivery system 50 and implanted to a position which allows the implant to communicate with at least a part of the anterior chamber and either the suprachoroidal space or supraciliary space, as described herein. The implant 20 can be implanted in the eye via an ab-interno procedure through a limbal incision into the anterior chamber. The implant 20 may then be positioned in the eye so that it provides fluid communication between the anterior chamber and either the suprachoroidal space or supraciliary space, as well as provide increased separation between the sclera and choroid, as shown in FIG. 12.


For example, the guidewire 58 can be positioned on the delivery system 50 such that the distal tip of the guidewire 58, the implant 20 and the sheath 60 can penetrate through a small corneal incision in order to access the anterior chamber, such as within the limbus of the cornea. In an embodiment, the incision can be very close to the limbus, such as either at the level of the limbus or within 2 mm of the limbus in the clear cornea. The guidewire 58 can be used to make the incision or a separate cutting device can be used. For example, a knife-tipped device or diamond knife can be used to provide access into the cornea.


The corneal incision can have a size that is sufficient to permit at least the passage of the implant 20 on the guidewire 58 and sheath 60 therethrough. In at least some method embodiments, the incision can be about 1 mm in size. In another embodiment, the incision is no greater than about 2.5 mm in size. In another embodiment, the incision is no greater than about 2.85 mm and is greater than about 1.5 mm.


After insertion through the incision, the guidewire 58 can be advanced into the anterior chamber along a pathway that enables the implant 20 to be delivered to a position such that the implant 20 provides a flow passageway from the anterior chamber toward either the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space. For example, the guidewire 58 can be advanced further into the eye such that a blunt distal tip of the guidewire 58 and/or the implant 20 can seat with and penetrate at least one of the iris root, a region of the ciliary body, or the iris root part of the ciliary body near its tissue border with the scleral spur.


In some method embodiments, the guidewire 58 can approach the iris root from a same side of the anterior chamber as a deployment location such that the guidewire 58 does not have to be advanced across the iris. Alternately, the guidewire 58 can approach the deployment location from across the anterior chamber such that the guidewire 58 is advanced across the iris and/or the anterior chamber toward the opposite iris root. The guidewire 58 can approach the eye and the iris root along a variety of pathways. In some method embodiments, the guidewire 58 does not cross over the eye and does not intersect an optical axis of the eye. In other words, the corneal incision and the location where the implant 20 can be implanted, such as adjacent the iris root, can be in the same quadrant (for example, if the eye is viewed from the front and divided into four quadrants). Additionally, in some method embodiments, the pathway of the implant from the corneal incision to the iris root does not pass through the optic axis of the eye in order to avoid interfering with the pupil.



FIG. 12 shows an enlarged view of the anterior region of the eye showing the anterior chamber AC, the cornea C, the iris I, and the sclera S. In addition, the implant 20 is shown as mounted on the guidewire 58 and approaching an implantation site from the anterior chamber AC. The implant 20 and guidewire 58 can move along a pathway such that the dissection entry point of the distal tip of the guidewire 58 can penetrate the iris root IR near its junction with the scleral spur SSp or the iris root portion of the ciliary body CB or other desired location. The surgeon can rotate or reposition the handle of the delivery device 50 in order to obtain a proper approach trajectory for the distal tip of the guidewire 58, as described in further detail below.


The guidewire 58 with the implant 20 positioned thereupon can be advanced from a region of the anterior chamber, which can be viewed through a transparent zone of the cornea to a region of the anterior chamber that is obscured by the opaque zone of the cornea. The guidewire 58 and implant 20 can be advanced through the cornea until resistance is felt and a part of the delivery device can be seated at a location near the iris root, the ciliary body or the iris root portion of the ciliary body. The guidewire 58 can then be advanced further such that the guidewire 58 and implant 20 loaded thereon penetrate an area of fibrous attachment between the scleral spur and the ciliary body. This area of fibrous attachment can be approximately 1 mm. Once the distal tip of the guidewire 58 penetrates and is urged past this fibrous attachment region, the guidewire 58 can then more easily cause the sclera to peel away or otherwise separate from the ciliary body and possibly the choroid as it follows the inner curve of the sclera and enters the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space. A combination of the guidewire's tip shape, material, material properties, diameter, flexibility, compliance, coatings, pre-curvature etc. can make it more inclined to follow an implantation pathway that mirrors the curvature of the inner wall of the sclera and between tissue layers, such as between the sclera and the ciliary body and between the sclera and the choroid.


The dissection plane of the guidewire 58 and implant 20 can follow the curve of the inner scleral wall such that the implant 20 mounted on the guidewire 58 after penetrating the iris root or the iris root portion of the ciliary body can bluntly dissect the boundary between tissue layers of the scleral spur and the ciliary body such that at least the distal region of the implant 20 extends into the supraciliary space. In an embodiment, the implant 20 can be positioned such that it extends sufficiently past the scleral spur and is positioned between the tissue boundaries of the sclera and the choroid (the suprachoroidal space SChS).


Once properly positioned, the implant 20 can then be released from the guidewire 58. The implant 20 can be released, for example, by withdrawing the guidewire 58 such that the implant 20 is effectively disengaged in a controlled manner from the tip of the guidewire 58 with the sheath 60.


The implant 20 can include one or more structural features near its proximal region that aid to anchor or retain the implant 20 in the target region in the eye. The structural features can include extruded features, such as rings 28, large proximal rings 34, flanges, protrusions, wings, tines, or prongs, and the like that can lodge into the surrounding eye anatomy to retain the implant 20 in place and prevent the implant 20 from moving further into the suprachoroidal space.


While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of an invention that is claimed or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or a variation of a sub-combination. Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Only a few examples and implementations are disclosed. Variations, modifications and enhancements to the described examples and implementations and other implementations may be made based on what is disclosed.

Claims
  • 1. An ocular implant system for implanting an implant in an eye comprising: an elongate tubular body comprising a proximal end, a distal end and an inner lumen extending at least partway between the proximal end and the distal end, the tubular body having a plurality of holes positioned along the length of the tubular body;a plurality of fenestrations extending through an outer surface of the tubular body and intersecting with the inner lumen; anda plurality of extruded features wherein at least one of the plurality of extruded features extends from the outer surface of the tubular body, and wherein the plurality of extruded features includes a plurality of extruded rings, and wherein each fenestration is positioned immediately adjacent an extruded ring such that each extruded ring immediately adjacent a fenestration tents eye tissue around each fenestration in a manner that results in fluid flow through at least one of the fenestrations when the elongate tubular body is implanted in an eye, and wherein the plurality of extruded rings includes at least one extruded ring positioned at a distal end of the elongate tubular body and at least one extruded ring positioned at a proximal end of the elongate tubular body;a delivery device configured to insert the tubular body into the eye, the delivery device including: a handle;a guidewire that inserts longitudinally through the inner lumen of the tubular body, the guidewire having an interior lumen for passage of fluid and also having a plurality of openings through which fluid can exit the interior lumen of the guidewire;a sheath positioned axially over the guidewire and positioned proximal of the tubular body when the tubular body is positioned on the guidewire.
  • 2. The implant of claim 1 wherein the implant is made out of a medical grade material, including at least one of a stainless steel, polyimide, various plastics, or any number of shape memory alloys, including nitinol, and shape memory polymers.
  • 3. The implant of claim 1 wherein at least one of the plurality of extruded features comprises a large proximal ring.
  • 4. The implant of claim 1 wherein the plurality of fenestrations vary in at least one of size and shape.
  • 5. The implant of claim 4 wherein the size of the fenestrations increase along a length of the implant in a distal direction.
  • 6. The implant of claim 4 wherein the fenestrations increase in number along a length of the implant in a distal direction.
  • 7. The implant of claim 1 wherein the plurality of rings vary in at least one of size and shape.
  • 8. The implant of claim 7 wherein the extruded features increase in size along a length of the implant in a distal direction.
  • 9. The implant of claim 1 wherein the implant includes at least one of a beveled proximal end and a beveled distal end.
  • 10. The implant of claim 1 wherein at least one of the proximal end or the distal end includes at least one of a chamfered edge and radiused edge.
  • 11. The implant of claim 1 wherein the implant is at least one of coated with a drug and comprised of a polymer combined with a drug.
  • 12. A method of implanting an implant in an eye, comprising; securing an implant to a delivery device configured to insert the implant into the eye, the implant comprising an elongate tubular body including a proximal end, a distal end and an inner lumen extending at least partway between the proximal end and the distal end;a plurality of fenestrations extending through an outer surface of the tubular body and intersecting with the inner lumen; andan a plurality of extruded features extending from the outer surface of the tubular body, and wherein the plurality of extruded features includes a plurality of extruded rings, and wherein each fenestration is positioned immediately adjacent an extruded ring such that each extruded ring immediately adjacent a fenestration tents eye tissue around each fenestration in a manner that results in fluid flow through at least one of the fenestrations when the elongate tubular body is implanted in an eye;the delivery device comprising: a handle;a guidewire that inserts longitudinally through the inner lumen of the tubular body, the guidewire having an interior lumen for passage of fluid and also having a plurality of openings through which fluid can exit the interior lumen of the guidewire;a sheath positioned axially over the guidewire and positioned proximal of the tubular body when the tubular body is positioned on the guidewire; andinserting the implant into the eye such that each extruded ring tents eye tissue around each of the corresponding fenestrations when the elongate tubular body is implanted in an eye in a manner that results in fluid flow through at least one of the fenestrations.
REFERENCE TO PRIORITY DOCUMENT

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/726,477 filed Nov. 14, 2012 under 37 C.F.R. §1.76(a). Priority of the filing date is hereby claimed and the full disclosure of the aforementioned application is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (349)
Number Name Date Kind
2990670 Kingsbury Jul 1961 A
3439675 Cohen Apr 1969 A
3767759 Wichterle Oct 1973 A
3788327 Donowitz et al. Jan 1974 A
3915172 Wichterle et al. Oct 1975 A
4037604 Newkirk Jul 1977 A
4402681 Haas et al. Sep 1983 A
4457757 Molteno Jul 1984 A
4521210 Wong Jun 1985 A
4554918 White Nov 1985 A
4604087 Joseph Aug 1986 A
4617715 Koistinen et al. Oct 1986 A
4634418 Binder Jan 1987 A
4722724 Schocket Feb 1988 A
4750901 Molteno Jun 1988 A
4787885 Binder Nov 1988 A
4826478 Schocket May 1989 A
4846172 Berlin Jul 1989 A
4863457 Lee Sep 1989 A
4886488 White Dec 1989 A
4900300 Lee Feb 1990 A
4946436 Smith Aug 1990 A
4968296 Ritch et al. Nov 1990 A
5041081 Odrich Aug 1991 A
5071408 Ahmed Dec 1991 A
5073163 Lippman Dec 1991 A
5092837 Ritch et al. Mar 1992 A
5127901 Odrich Jul 1992 A
5171213 Price, Jr. Dec 1992 A
5178604 Baerveldt et al. Jan 1993 A
5180362 Worst Jan 1993 A
5284476 Koch Feb 1994 A
5300020 L'Esperance, Jr. Apr 1994 A
5338291 Speckman et al. Aug 1994 A
5342370 Simon et al. Aug 1994 A
5346464 Camras Sep 1994 A
5370607 Memmen Dec 1994 A
5372577 Ungerleider Dec 1994 A
5397300 Baerveldt et al. Mar 1995 A
5423777 Tajiri et al. Jun 1995 A
5433701 Rubinstein Jul 1995 A
5443505 Wong et al. Aug 1995 A
5454746 Guegan et al. Oct 1995 A
5476445 Baerveldt et al. Dec 1995 A
5558629 Baerveldt et al. Sep 1996 A
5558630 Fisher Sep 1996 A
5569197 Helmus Oct 1996 A
RE35390 Smith Dec 1996 E
5601094 Reiss Feb 1997 A
5626558 Suson May 1997 A
5626559 Solomon May 1997 A
5651782 Simon et al. Jul 1997 A
5676944 Alvarado et al. Oct 1997 A
5702414 Richter et al. Dec 1997 A
5704907 Nordquist et al. Jan 1998 A
5713844 Peyman Feb 1998 A
5741292 Mendius Apr 1998 A
5743868 Brown et al. Apr 1998 A
5749879 Middleman et al. May 1998 A
5752928 de Roulhac et al. May 1998 A
5792075 Schwager Aug 1998 A
5807244 Barot Sep 1998 A
5807302 Wandel Sep 1998 A
5868697 Richter et al. Feb 1999 A
5882327 Jacob Mar 1999 A
5893837 Eagles et al. Apr 1999 A
5941250 Aramant et al. Aug 1999 A
5968058 Richter et al. Oct 1999 A
6007510 Nigam Dec 1999 A
6007511 Prywes Dec 1999 A
6036678 Giungo Mar 2000 A
6050970 Baerveldt Apr 2000 A
6050999 Paraschac et al. Apr 2000 A
6077299 Adelberg et al. Jun 2000 A
6102045 Nordquist et al. Aug 2000 A
6142969 Nigam Nov 2000 A
6152918 Padilla et al. Nov 2000 A
6174307 Daniel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6186974 Allan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6203513 Yaron et al. Mar 2001 B1
6221078 Bylsma Apr 2001 B1
6251090 Avery et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261256 Ahmed Jul 2001 B1
6264668 Prywes Jul 2001 B1
6270472 Antaki et al. Aug 2001 B1
6331313 Wong et al. Dec 2001 B1
6375642 Grieshaber et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383219 Telandro et al. May 2002 B1
6450984 Lynch et al. Sep 2002 B1
6464724 Lynch et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468283 Richter et al. Oct 2002 B1
6471666 Odrich Oct 2002 B1
6471777 Kobayashi et al. Oct 2002 B1
6494857 Neuhann Dec 2002 B1
6508779 Suson Jan 2003 B1
6510600 Yaron et al. Jan 2003 B2
6524275 Lynch et al. Feb 2003 B1
6533768 Hill Mar 2003 B1
6537568 Olejnik et al. Mar 2003 B2
6544208 Ethier et al. Apr 2003 B2
6544249 Yu et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558342 Yaron et al. May 2003 B1
6561974 Grieshaber et al. May 2003 B1
6579256 Hughes Jun 2003 B2
6589203 Mitrev Jul 2003 B1
6595945 Brown Jul 2003 B2
6626858 Lynch et al. Sep 2003 B2
6638239 Bergheim et al. Oct 2003 B1
6648283 Chase et al. Nov 2003 B2
6666841 Gharib et al. Dec 2003 B2
6676607 de Juan, Jr. et al. Jan 2004 B2
6699210 Williams et al. Mar 2004 B2
6699211 Savage Mar 2004 B2
6719750 Varner et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726664 Yaron et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726676 Stegmann et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730056 Ghaem et al. May 2004 B1
6736791 Tu et al. May 2004 B1
6741666 Henry et al. May 2004 B1
6752753 Hoskins et al. Jun 2004 B1
6780164 Bergheim et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783544 Lynch et al. Aug 2004 B2
6786888 Zadno-Azizi et al. Sep 2004 B1
6827699 Lynch et al. Dec 2004 B2
6827700 Lynch et al. Dec 2004 B2
6881197 Nigam Apr 2005 B1
6881198 Brown Apr 2005 B2
6939298 Brown et al. Sep 2005 B2
6955656 Bergheim et al. Oct 2005 B2
6962573 Wilcox Nov 2005 B1
6966888 Cullen et al. Nov 2005 B2
6969384 de Juan, Jr. et al. Nov 2005 B2
6981958 Gharib et al. Jan 2006 B1
6989007 Shadduck Jan 2006 B2
7041077 Shields May 2006 B2
7090681 Weber et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094225 Tu et al. Aug 2006 B2
7135009 Tu et al. Nov 2006 B2
7160264 Lisk, Jr. et al. Jan 2007 B2
7163543 Smedley et al. Jan 2007 B2
7186232 Smedley et al. Mar 2007 B1
7192412 Zhou et al. Mar 2007 B1
7195774 Carvalho et al. Mar 2007 B2
7207965 Simon Apr 2007 B2
7220238 Lynch et al. May 2007 B2
7273475 Tu et al. Sep 2007 B2
7291125 Coroneo Nov 2007 B2
7297130 Bergheim et al. Nov 2007 B2
7331984 Tu et al. Feb 2008 B2
7431710 Tu et al. Oct 2008 B2
7488303 Haffner et al. Feb 2009 B1
7563241 Tu et al. Jul 2009 B2
7708711 Tu et al. May 2010 B2
7850637 Lynch et al. Dec 2010 B2
7857782 Tu et al. Dec 2010 B2
7867186 Haffner et al. Jan 2011 B2
7867205 Bergheim et al. Jan 2011 B2
7972616 Dubrow et al. Jul 2011 B2
8075511 Tu et al. Dec 2011 B2
8128588 Coroneo Mar 2012 B2
8172899 Silvestrini et al. May 2012 B2
8337393 Silverstrini et al. Dec 2012 B2
8702727 Harrington et al. Apr 2014 B1
8721656 De Juan, Jr. et al. May 2014 B2
20020013546 Grieshaber et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013572 Berlin Jan 2002 A1
20020072673 Yamamoto et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087111 Ethier et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020111608 Baerveldt et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128613 Nakayama Sep 2002 A1
20020133168 Smedley et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143284 Tu et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020177856 Richter et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188308 Tu et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020193725 Odrich Dec 2002 A1
20020193804 Tickle Dec 2002 A1
20030028127 Balzum et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030028228 Sand Feb 2003 A1
20030055372 Lynch et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060752 Bergheim et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030097151 Smedley et al. May 2003 A1
20030097171 Elliott May 2003 A1
20030109883 Matsuzaki et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135149 Cullen et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030181848 Bergheim et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187384 Bergheim et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208163 Yaron et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229303 Haffner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236483 Ren Dec 2003 A1
20030236484 Lynch et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040015140 Shields Jan 2004 A1
20040024345 Gharib et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040088048 Richter et al. May 2004 A1
20040092856 Dahan May 2004 A1
20040097984 Zapata May 2004 A1
20040102729 Haffner et al. May 2004 A1
20040106977 Sullivan et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111050 Smedley et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127843 Tu et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147870 Burns et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148022 Eggleston Jul 2004 A1
20040193095 Shadduck Sep 2004 A1
20040193262 Shadduck Sep 2004 A1
20040210181 Vass et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210185 Tu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040216749 Tu Nov 2004 A1
20040225250 Yablonski Nov 2004 A1
20040236343 Taylor et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040249333 Bergheim et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254517 Quiroz-Mercado et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254519 Tu et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254520 Porteous et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254521 Simon Dec 2004 A1
20040260228 Lynch et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050008673 Snyder et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050049578 Tu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050085892 Goto et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050090806 Lynch et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050090807 Lynch et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050101967 Weber et al. May 2005 A1
20050107734 Coroneo May 2005 A1
20050119601 Lynch et al. Jun 2005 A9
20050119636 Haffner et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050119737 Bene et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050125003 Pinchuk et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143817 Hunter et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149080 Hunter et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050171507 Christian et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175663 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050181011 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050181977 Hunter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182350 Nigam Aug 2005 A1
20050191331 Hunter et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050192527 Gharib et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197613 Sniegowski et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209549 Bergheim et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209550 Bergheim et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050232972 Odrich Oct 2005 A1
20050244462 Farooq Nov 2005 A1
20050250788 Tu et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050266047 Tu et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050267397 Bhalla Dec 2005 A1
20050267398 Protopsaltis et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050271704 Tu et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050273033 Grahn et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277864 Haffner et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283108 Savage Dec 2005 A1
20050287188 Anderson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288617 Yaron et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288619 Gharib et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004348 Scheller et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020248 Prescott Jan 2006 A1
20060032507 Tu Feb 2006 A1
20060036207 Koonmen et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060069340 Simon Mar 2006 A1
20060074375 Bergheim et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060084907 Bergheim et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060116626 Smedley et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149194 Conston et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060155238 Shields Jul 2006 A1
20060173397 Tu et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195055 Bergheim et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195056 Bergheim et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200113 Haffner et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235367 Takashima et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241580 Mittelstein et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241749 Tu et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060276739 Brown Dec 2006 A1
20070010827 Tu et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070088242 Coroneo Apr 2007 A1
20070088424 Greenberg et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088432 Solovay et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070106235 Coroneo May 2007 A1
20070106236 Coroneo May 2007 A1
20070112292 Tu et al. May 2007 A1
20070118147 Smedley et al. May 2007 A1
20070129717 Brown et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070141106 Bonutti et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149915 Yablonski Jun 2007 A1
20070191863 De Juan et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070207186 Scanlon et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233037 Gifford, et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070276315 Haffner et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276316 Haffner et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282244 Tu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070282245 Tu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070293807 Lynch et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080015488 Tu et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080045878 Bergheim et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058704 Hee et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080108933 Yu et al. May 2008 A1
20080147021 Jani Jun 2008 A1
20080195027 Coroneo Aug 2008 A1
20080200860 Tu et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228127 Burns Sep 2008 A1
20080234624 Bergheim et al. Sep 2008 A2
20090036819 Tu et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090036840 Viray et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090043321 Conston et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090118702 Lazar May 2009 A1
20090171358 Chang et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182421 Silvestrini et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100010416 Juan, Jr. et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100134759 Silvestrini et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100137981 Silvestrini et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100152641 Yablonski Jun 2010 A1
20100211079 Aramant Aug 2010 A1
20100234790 Tu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100274259 Yaron et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110028883 Juan, Jr. et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110028884 Theodore Coroneo Feb 2011 A1
20110087148 Silvestrini et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110087149 Theodore Coroneo Apr 2011 A1
20110087150 Theodore Coroneo Apr 2011 A1
20110087151 Theodore Coroneo Apr 2011 A1
20110098629 Juan, Jr. et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098809 Wardle et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110112546 Juan, Jr. et al. May 2011 A1
20110238075 Clauson et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110276054 Helmy Nov 2011 A1
20110288525 Hallen et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110306915 De Juan, Jr. et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120035524 Silvestrini Feb 2012 A1
20120035525 Silvestrini Feb 2012 A1
20120089071 Oliver et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120116504 Lyons et al. May 2012 A1
20120123316 Horvath et al. May 2012 A1
20120123434 Grabner et al. May 2012 A1
20120220917 Silvestrini et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271272 Hammack et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130281817 Schaller et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130281908 Schaller et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140012279 de Juan, Jr. et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140066831 Silvestrini et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140081195 Clauson et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140107556 Silvestrini et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140155805 Schaller et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188030 Coroneo Jul 2014 A1
20140213958 Clauson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140309599 Schaller Oct 2014 A1
20140323995 Clauson et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140364789 Schaller Dec 2014 A1
20140378886 de Juan,, Jr. et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150022780 John et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150126809 Silvestrini et al. May 2015 A1
20150223982 Yablonski Aug 2015 A1
20150238360 de Juan, Jr. et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150320596 Gifford, III et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150335487 de Juan, Jr. Nov 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (84)
Number Date Country
1225027 Aug 1999 CN
1285724 Feb 2001 CN
1124164 Oct 2003 CN
1681457 Oct 2005 CN
0228185 Nov 1986 EP
1184010 Mar 2002 EP
1310222 May 2003 EP
1473004 Nov 2004 EP
1477146 Nov 2004 EP
1418868 Mar 2008 EP
1977724 Oct 2008 EP
2027837 Feb 2009 EP
2101891 Jan 1983 GB
2007-535386 Dec 2007 JP
2010-533565 Oct 2010 JP
2018289 Aug 1994 RU
2056818 Mar 1996 RU
2074686 Mar 1997 RU
2074687 Mar 1997 RU
2157678 Oct 2000 RU
WO-8900869 Feb 1989 WO
WO-9112046 Aug 1991 WO
WO-9219294 Nov 1992 WO
WO-9402081 Feb 1994 WO
WO-9409721 May 1994 WO
WO-9409837 May 1994 WO
WO-9413234 Jun 1994 WO
WO-9508310 Mar 1995 WO
WO-9620742 Jul 1996 WO
WO-9636377 Nov 1996 WO
WO-9823237 Jun 1998 WO
WO-9830181 Jul 1998 WO
WO-9926567 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9926567 Jun 1999 WO
WO-0006223 Feb 2000 WO
WO-0064389 Nov 2000 WO
WO-0064390 Nov 2000 WO
WO-0064391 Nov 2000 WO
WO-0064393 Nov 2000 WO
WO-0064511 Nov 2000 WO
WO-0178631 Oct 2001 WO
WO-0178656 Oct 2001 WO
WO-0197727 Dec 2001 WO
WO-0236052 May 2002 WO
WO-02070045 Sep 2002 WO
WO-02074052 Sep 2002 WO
WO-02080811 Oct 2002 WO
WO-02080829 Oct 2002 WO
WO-02087418 Nov 2002 WO
WO-02087479 Nov 2002 WO
WO-02089699 Nov 2002 WO
WO-02102274 Dec 2002 WO
WO-03015659 Feb 2003 WO
WO-03015667 Feb 2003 WO
WO-03041622 May 2003 WO
WO-03073968 Sep 2003 WO
WO-03099175 Dec 2003 WO
WO-2004014218 Feb 2004 WO
WO-2004026106 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004026347 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004043231 May 2004 WO
WO-2004056294 Jul 2004 WO
WO-2004060219 Jul 2004 WO
WO-2004062469 Jul 2004 WO
WO-2004073552 Sep 2004 WO
WO-2004110391 Dec 2004 WO
WO-2005016418 Feb 2005 WO
WO-2005046782 May 2005 WO
WO-2005055873 Jun 2005 WO
WO-2005105197 Nov 2005 WO
WO-2005107664 Nov 2005 WO
WO-2005107845 Nov 2005 WO
WO-2006012421 Feb 2006 WO
WO-2006036715 Apr 2006 WO
WO-2007087061 Aug 2007 WO
WO-2007115259 Oct 2007 WO
WO-2007130393 Nov 2007 WO
WO-2008061043 May 2008 WO
WO-2009012406 Jan 2009 WO
WO-2009158524 Dec 2009 WO
WO-2010065970 Jun 2010 WO
WO-2010115101 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2014078288 Nov 2013 WO
WO 2014190029 May 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (128)
Entry
Barsky et al. “Evaluation of absorbable gelatin film (Gelfilm) in cyclodialysis clefts” Arch. Ophth. 60(6): 1044-1052,1958.
Bick MW “Use of tantalum for ocular drainage” Arch Ophthal. 42(4): 373-88 (1949).
Bietti “The present state of the use of plastics in eye surgery” Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 33(4):337-70 (1955).
Brown et al., “Internal Sclerectomy for Glaucoma Filtering Surgery with an Automated Trephine,” Archives of Ophthalmology, 105:133-136 (1987).
Burchfield JC, Kass MA, Wax MB. Primary valve malfunction of the Krupin eye valve with disk. J Glaucoma. Jun. 1997;6(3):152-6.
Chiou et al. “Ultrasound biomicroscopy of eyes undergoing deep sclerectomy with collagen implant” Br J Ophthalmol 80 (1996), pp. 541-544.
Chylack LT, Bellows AR. Molecular sieving in suprachoroidal fluid formation in man. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17: 420, 1978.
Classen et al. “A histopathologic and immunohistorchemical analysis of the filtration bleb after unsuccessful glaucoma seton implantation” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 122:205-12 (1996).
Cohen et al. “First day post-operative review following uncomplicated phacoemulsification” Eye 12(4):634-6 (1998).
Collaborative Normal-Tension Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:487-97.
Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:477-85.
Coote. “Glaucoma Hollow Fiber Filters—A New Glaucoma Seton. Preliminary Results.” J. Glaucoma. vol. 8 No. 1 Supplement (1999):p. S4.
Cullen, et al. “Anterior Chamber of Frontal Sinus Shunt for the Diversion of Aqueous Humor: A Pilot Study in Four Normal Dogs”. Veterinary Ophthalmology. vol. 1. No. 1. (1998):31-39.
Demailly et al. “Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with or without collagen device (CD) in primary open-angle glaucoma: middle-term retrospective study” International Ophthalmology 20: 131-140, 1997.
Derwent English abstract for EP 1184010, published Mar. 6, 2002 entitled: “Drainage unit for an eye, consists of a hollow line, a distribution member, and a pressure relief valve which only allows water to leave the eye chamber above a certain pressure,” Accession No. 12409716 [351].
Dinakaran et al. “Is the first post-operative day review necessary following uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery?” Eye, 14(3A):364-6 (2000).
Draeger “Chirurgische Maβnahmen bei kongenitalem Glaukom” (Surgical Interventions in Congenital Glaucoma) Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1993; 202(5): 425-427 [Article in German with English summary included].
Einmahl et al. “Evaluation of a novel biomaterial in the suprachoroidal space of the rabbit eye” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43:1533-1539 (2002).
Ellis, RA “A Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Using Plastics in Surgery” Am J Ophth. 50; 1960, 733-742.
Emi et al. “Hydrostatic pressure of the suprachoroidal space” Invest. Ophthal. Visual Sci. 30(2):233-238 (1989).
Fanous MM, Cohn RA. Propionibacterium endophthalmitis following Molteno tube repositioning. J Glaucoma. Aug. 1997;6(4):201-2.
Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O'Colmain BJ, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:532-8.
Fuchs E. “Detachment of the choroid inadvertently during cataract surgery” [German] von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol, 51:199-224 (1900) [Article in German with English summary].
Gills et al. “Action of cyclodialysis utilizing an implant studied by manometry in a human eye” Exp Eye Res 1967; 6:75-78.
Gills JP “Cyclodialysis implants” South Med J. 1967 60(7):692-5.
Gills, “Cyclodialysis Implants in Human Eyes” Am J Ophth 61:1966,841-846.
Goldberg “Management of Uncontrolled Glaucoma With the Molteno System” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1987; 15: 97-107.
Gordon MO, Kass. MA, for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol 1999:573-83.
Grant, W.M. , MD, Further Studies on Facility of Flow Through the Trabecular Meshwork, A.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmololgy, Oct. 1958, vol. 60, pp. 523-533.
Gross et al. “Surgical therapy of chronic glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia” Ophthalmology, 95:1195-201 (1988).
Harper SL, Foster CS. Intraocular lens explantation in uveitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2000 Winter; 40(1):107-16.
Harrington “Cataract and Glaucoma. Management of the coexistent conditions and a description of a new operation combining lens extraction with reverse cyclodialysis.” Am J Ophthalmol. May 1996;61(5 Pt 2):1134-40.
Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression. Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268-79.
Heine I. “Cyclodialysis, a new glaucoma operation” [German] Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 31:824-826 (1905).
Hildebrand et al. “Efficacy of anterior chamber decompression in controlling early intraocular pressure spikes after uneventful phacoemulsification” J. Catact Refract Surg., 29:1087-92 (2003).
Hoskins, et al., “Aqueous Humor Outflow”, Becker-Shaffer's Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas, 6th Edition, Chapter 4, pp. 41-66, 1989.
Howorth D J “Feasibility study for a micromachined glaucoma drainage device” Cranfield University School of industrial and manufacturing science MSc Thesis Academic Year 2001-2002 Sep. 13, 2002.
Hylton et al. “Update on prostaglandin analogs” Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 14:65-9 (2003).
Javitt JC, Chiang YP. Preparing for managed competition. Utilization of ambulatory eye care visits to ophthalmologists. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1034-5.
Jay JL, Allan D. The benefit of early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open-angle glaucoma relative to severity of disease. Eye 1989; 3:528-35.
Jordan J. “A Novel Approach to Suprachoroidal Drainage for the Surgical Treatment of Intractable Glaucoma” J. Glaucoma 15:200-205 (2006).
Jordan JF, Dietlein TS, Dinslage S, Luke C, Konen W, Krieglstein GK. Cyclodialysis ab inferno as a surgical approach to intractable glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Aug. 2007;245(8):1071-6.
Karlen et al. “Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant: medium term results” Br. J. Ophthalmol, Jan. 1999, 83(1):6-11.
Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The Ocular HypertensionTreatment Study. A randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:701-13.
Klemm et al. “Die Ultraschallbiomikroskopie als Kriterium der Funktionsprüfung des suprachorioidalen Spaltes nach kammerwinkelchirurgischen Eingriffen (Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Imaging for Assessment of the Suprachoroidal Cleft after Angle Surgery) Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 1997; 210: 74-77 [Article in German with English summary included]”.
Klemm et al. “Experimental use of space-retaining substances with extended duration: functional and morphological results” Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Sep. 1995; 233(9):592-7.
Kozlov et al. “Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with collagen” Eye microsurgery 3:44-46 (1990) [Russian with English translation].
Krejci “Cyclodialysis with hydroxymethyl methacrylate capillary strip (HCS). Animal experiments with a new approach in glaucoma drainage surgery” Ophthalmologica 1972; 164(2):113-21.
Krejcí L. “Microdrainage of anterior chamber of eye glaucoma operation using hydron capillary drain. ” Acta Univ Carol Med Monogr. 1974;(61):1-90.
Kupfer “Studies on intraocular pressure. I. A technique for polyethylene tube implantation into the anterior chamber of the rabbit. ” Arch Ophthalmol. Apr. 1961;65:565-70.
La Rocca “Gonioplasty in Glaucoma A Preliminary Report” Br J Ophth 46:1962, 404-415.
Law et al., “Retinal Complications After Aqueous Shunt Surgical Procedures for Glaucoma” Arch Ophthal.; Dec. 1996; vol. 114:1473-1480.
Lee et al. “Aqueous-venous shunt and intraocular pressure. Preliminary report of animal studies.” Investigative Ophthalmology. vol. 5 No. 1: 59-64. Feb. 1966.
Lee et al. “Magnetic resonance imaging of the aqueous flow in eyes implanted with the trabeculo-suprachoroidal glaucoma seton” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33:948 (1992).
Lee KY. Trabeculo-suprachoroidal shunt for treating recalcitrant and secondary glaucoma. Presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, 1991.
Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, et al for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment. The Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol Jan. 2003;121:48-56.
Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al and the CIGTS Study Group. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1943-53.
Losche W. “Proposals for improvement of cyclodialysis Klin Monatsblatter Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild” 121(6):715-6 (1952) [German].
Marx et al., “Use of the Ganciclovir Implant in the Treatment of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Retinitis” Arch Ophthal.; Jul. 1996; vol. 114:815-820.
McPherson “Combined Trabeculotomy and Cataract Extraction as a Single Operation” Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc., vol. LXXIV, 1976; 251-260.
Migdal C, Gregory W, Hitchings R. Long term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1651-7.
Miglior S, Pfeiffer N, Zeyen T et al for the European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group. Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology 2005;112:366-75.
Miglior S, Zeyen T, Pfeiffer N, et al for the European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study design and baseline description of the participants. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1612-21.
Miki, MD et al., “Intraocular Cannula for Continuous, Chronic Drug Delivery-Histopathic Observations and Function” Arch Ophthal.; May 1985; vol. 103:712-717.
Molteno et al. “Long tube implants in the management of glaucoma” South African Medical Journal, Jun. 26, 1976;50(27):1062-6.
Molteno et al. “The Vicryl tie technique for inserting a draining implant in the treatment of secondary glaucoma.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1986; 14: 343-354.
Moses RA “Detachment of ciliary body-anatomical and physical considerations” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Assoc. for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, US, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 1, 1965.
Nesterov AP et al. “Surgical stimulation of the uveoscleral outflow. Experimental studies on enucleated human eyes” Acta Opthalmol (Copenh) June; 57(3):409-17 (1979).
Nguyen et al., “Complications of Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Implants” Arch Ophthal.; May 1998; vol. 116:571-575.
Noecker RJ. Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Gold Micro-Shunt for Reduction of 10 P in Refractory Glaucomas. American Glaucoma Society Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2007.http://www.glaucomaweb.org/associations/5224/files/AGS%20AM07%20Prgrm%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed Nov. 1, 2008).
O'Brien et al. “Cyclodialysis” Arch Ophthal. 1949;42(5):606-619.
Odrich. “The New Technique During Complex Tube-Shunt Implantation”. J. Glaucoma. vol. 9 No. 3 (2000):278-279.
Olsen, Timothy W., et al., Cannulation of the Suprachoroidal Space: A Novel Drug Delivery Methodology to the Posterior Segment, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 142, No. 5, Nov. 2006, pp. 777-787.e2.
Ozdamar et al. “Suprachoroidal seton implantation in refractory glaucoma: a novel surgical technique” J. Glaucoma Aug. 2003; 12(4):354-9.
Pinnas G. et al. “Cyclodialysis with teflon tube implants” Am J. Ophthalmol Nov. 1969; 68(5):879-883.
Portney GL, “Silicone elastomer implantation cyclodialysis.” Arch Ophthalmol 1973; 89: 10-12.
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Preferred Practice Patterns, American Academy of Ophthalmology.http://one.aao.org/CE/PracticeGuidelines/PPP—Content.aspx?cid=a5a59e02-450b-4d50-8091-b2dd2lefl ff2#references (Accessed Nov. 1, 2008).
Pruett et al., “The Fishmouth Phenomenon-II. Wedge Scleral Buckling” Arch Ophthal.; Oct. 1977; vol. 95:1782-1787.
Qadeer “Acrylic Gonio-Subconjunctival Plates in Glaucoma Surgery ” Br J Ophthalmol. Jun. 1954; 38(6): 353-356.
Quigley HA, Vitale S. Models of open-angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38:83-91.
Richards et al. “Artificial Drainage Tubes for Glaucoma” Am J Ophth 60:1965,405-408.
Ritch, et al., “Uveoscleral Outflow”, The Glaucomas. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996; pp. 337-343.
Rohen, Johannes W., Anatomy of the Aqueous Outflow Channels, Glaucoma, vol. 1, Chapter 14, pp. 277-296, Edited by J.E. Cairns, Grune & Stratton, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, 1986.
Rosenberg, et al. “Implants in glaucoma surgery” Chapter 88, The Glaucomas, Ritch et al. Eds. 2nd Ed. Mosby St. Louis 1996; p. 1783-1807.
Row H. “Operation to control glaucoma: preliminary report” Arch. Ophthal 12:325 (1934).
Rowan, Patrick J., MD, Combined Cyclodialysis and Cataract Surgery, Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, Dec. 1998, vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 962-968 (9 pages).
Sampimon “A New Approach to Filtering Glaucoma Surgery” Ophthalmologica (Basel) 151: 1966, 637-644.
Schappert S. Office visits for glaucoma: United States, 1991-92. Advance data from vital and health statistics. vol. 262. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1995.
Shaffer RN, Weiss DI. Concerning cyclodialysis and hypotony. Arch Ophthalmol 68: 25, 1962.
SOLX Clinical Literature Handout; Industry Show Feb. 2006; “The SOLX Gold Micro-shunt (GMS) treatment”.
Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1412-7.
Sourdille et al. “Reticulated hyaluronic acid implant in non-perforating trabecular surgery.” J Cataract Refract Surg 25: 332-339. (1999):.
Spiegel et al. “Schlemm's Canal Implant: A New Method to Lower Intraocular Pressure in Patients With POAG?” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers. vol. 30, No. 6: 492-494. Jun. 1999.
Srinivasan et al. “Microbial contamination of the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification” J. Cataract Refract Surg. 28:2173-6 (2002).
Suguro K, Toris CB, Pederson JE. Uveoscleral outflow following cyclodialysis in the monkey eye using a fluorescent tracer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985: 26, 810.
The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:429-40.
The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS); 13. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race: 10-year results. Ophthalmology 2004;111:651-64.
The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT) and Glaucoma Laser Trial Follow-up Study: 7. Results. Am J Ophthahnol 1995;120:718-31.
The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT). 2. Results of argon laser trabeculoplasty versus topical medicines. The Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1403-13.
Thiagalingam S, Tarongoy P, Hamrah P, Lobo AM, Nagao K, Barsam C, Bellows R, Pineda R. Complications of cosmetic iris implants. J Cataract Refract Surg. Jul. 2008:34(7)1222-4.
Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991;266:369-74.
Toris CB. Extravascular albumin concentration of the uvea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31:43.
Toris et al. “Aqueous humor dynamics in the aging human eye” Am J. Ophthalmol., 127:407-12 (1999).
Toris et al. “Effect of intraocular pressure on uveoscleral outflow following cyclodialysis in the monkey eye.” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 26 (1985) 1745-1749.
Transcend Medical Inc. v. Glaukos Corporation, Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Disclosures Pursuant to Default Discovery Rule 4 (d) (United States District Court for the District of Delaware, dated Dec. 6, 2013; case No. C.A. No. 13-830 (MSG) and Certificate of Service, dated Dec. 9, 2013.
Trigler L, Proia AD, Freedman SF. Fibrovascular ingrowth as a cause of Ahmed glaucoma valve failure in children. Am J Ophthalmol. Feb. 2006;141(2):388-9.
Troncoso Manuel U., “Cyclodialysis with insertion of metal implant in treatment of glaucoma, A Preliminary Report” Arch. Ophthal. 23:270 (1940).
Troncoso, Manuel U., Tantalum implants for inducing hypotny, Am Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 32(4):499-508 (1949).
Van der Veen et al. “The gonioseton, a surgical treatment for chronic glaucoma. Documenta Ophthalmologica; vol. 75, Nos. 3-4, 365-375. (1990)”.
Vossmerbaeumer U, Ditzen K, Jonas JB. Removal of an intracorneal hydrogel implant for hyperopia after LASIK. J Refract Surg. Jan. 2007;23(1):102-4.
Wagner, Justin A., et al., Characterization of Uveoscleral Outflow in Enucleated Porcine Eyes Perfused under Constant Pressure, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., Published in edited form in Sep. 2004, vol. 45, Issue 9, pp. 3203-3206.
Wamsley S, Moster MR, Rai S, Alvim HS, Fontanarosa J. Results of the use of the Ex-Press miniature glaucoma implant in technically challenging, advanced glaucoma cases: a clinical pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol. Dec. 2004; 138(6): 1049-51.
Yablonski, “Some thoughts on the pressure dependence of uveoscleral flow” Journal of Glaucoma, 12(1):90-92 (2003).
Yablonski, “Trabeculectomy with Internal Tube Shunt: a novel glaucoma surgery” J. Glaucoma 14:91-97 (2005).
Yoo C, Kwon SW, Kim YY. Pericardium plug in the repair of the corneoscleral fistula after ahmed glaucoma valve explantation. Korean J Ophthalmol. Dec. 2008;22(4):268-71.
Zhou et al. “A trabecular bypass flow hypothesis” J Glaucoma. 14(1):74-83 (2005).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”), Commonwealth of Australia—Opponent's Statement of Grounds and Particulars of Opposition. (Apr. 10, 2014).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Mr. Craig Andrews in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Colin Clement in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Ilesh Patel in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Opponent's amended Statement of Grounds and Particulars of Opposition. (Sep. 10, 2014).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Robert L. Stamper in support of Applicant's Evidence in Answer. (Dec. 4, 2014).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Jonathan G. Crowston in support of Applicant's Evidence in Answer. (Dec. 6, 2014).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Anne Jen-Wan Lee in support of Applicant's Evidence in Answer. (Dec. 7, 2014).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Colin Clement in support of Opponent's Evidence in Reply. (Feb. 8, 2015).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Ilesh Patel in support of Opponent's Evidence in Reply. (Feb. 10, 2015).
In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Mr. Craig Andrews in support of Opponent's Evidence in Reply. (Feb. 11, 2015).
Schocket, Stanley S. “Investigations of the Reasons for Success and Failure in the Anterior Shunt-to-the-Encircling-Band Procedure in the Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma.” Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc.vol. LXXXIX. (1986):743-798.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140135916 A1 May 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61726477 Nov 2012 US