None.
1. Field of the Disclosure
The present invention relates to fluid flow control for downhole tools.
2. Description of the Related Art
Control of fluid circulation can be of operational significance for numerous devices used in oil and gas wells. One illustrative example is a gravel packing tool used for gravel packing operations. In general, gravel packing includes the installation of a screen adjacent a subsurface formation followed by the packing of gravel in the perforations and around the screen to prevent sand from migrating from the formation to the production tubing. Usually, a slurry of gravel suspended in a viscous carrier fluid is pumped downhole through the work string and a cross-over assembly into the annulus. Pump pressure is applied to the slurry forcing the suspended gravel through the perforations or up against the formation sand. The gravel then accumulates in the annulus between the screen and the casing or the formation sand. The gravel forms a barrier which allows the in-flow of hydrocarbons but inhibits the flow of sand particles into the production tubing. Afterwards, a clean-up operation may be performed wherein a cleaning fluid is reverse circulated through the well to clean the tools of slurry and leaving only the gravel pack surrounding the screens behind.
The present disclosure provides methods and devices for controlling fluid circulation during gravel packing operations. The present disclosure also provides for controlling fluid circulation in other wellbore-related operations.
In aspects, the present disclosure provides an apparatus for completing a well. The apparatus may include a tool configured have a first flow path in a first position and a second flow path in a second position. Each flow path allows fluid flow. The first flow path may include at least a port coupling the upper bore to a lower annulus surrounding the tool, a lower bore of the tool in communication with the lower annulus, and a mechanically static and bi-directional flow passage connecting the lower bore with an upper annulus surrounding the tool. The second flow path may include at least a first branch having the port coupling the upper annulus to the upper bore; and a second branch having a mechanically static and bi-directional flow passage coupling the upper annulus to the lower bore.
In aspects, the present disclosure also provides a method for completing a well using a tool disposed in the well. The method may include flowing a gravel slurry through an upper bore of the tool, a port coupling the upper bore to a lower annulus surrounding the tool, a lower bore of the tool in communication with the lower annulus, and a mechanically static and bi-directional flow passage connecting the lower bore with an upper annulus surrounding the tool; and flowing a cleaning fluid through a port coupling the upper annulus to the upper bore, and through a mechanically static and bi-directional flow passage coupling the upper annulus to the lower bore.
In still further aspects, the present disclosure provides a system for completing a well. The system may include a tool having an upper bore, a lower bore, and a port providing fluid communication between the upper bore and an exterior of the tool; a valve member selectively isolating the upper bore from the lower bore; a flow path formed in the tool, the flow path providing fluid communication between an exterior of the tool and the lower bore. The flow path may include a mechanically static and bi-directional flow passage.
It should be understood that examples of the more illustrative features of the disclosure have been summarized rather broadly in order that detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood, and in order that the contributions to the art may be appreciated. There are, of course, additional features of the disclosure that will be described hereinafter and which will form the subject of the claims appended hereto.
The advantages and further aspects of the disclosure will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters designate like or similar elements throughout the several figures of the drawing and wherein:
The present disclosure relates to devices and methods for controlling fluid flow in downhole tools. The present disclosure is susceptible to embodiments of different forms. There are shown in the drawings, and herein will be described in detail, specific embodiments of the present disclosure with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the principles of the disclosure, and is not intended to limit the disclosure to that illustrated and described herein.
Referring initially to
For ease of explanation, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in connection with a flow control device associated with a gravel pack tool. It should be understood, however, that the teachings of the present disclosure may be utilized in connection with any downhole tool that utilizes flow control devices.
Referring now to
Referring now to
By mechanically static, it is generally meant that the flow control element 60 does not substantially change in size or shape or otherwise change in configuration during operation. In contrast, a mechanically dynamic device may include a flapper valve, a multi-position valve, a ball valve and other devices that can, for example, change a size of a cross sectional flow area during operation. Thus, in aspects, the term mechanically static includes structures that have a fixed dimension, orientation, or position during operation. In some arrangements, the flow control element 60 may include helical channels, orifices, grooves and other flow restricting conduits. In embodiments, the length and configuration of the helical channels may be selected to apply an amount of frictional losses in order to generate a predetermined amount of back pressure along the flow control device 58. In an embodiment, the shape and diameter of an orifice or orifices may be selected to reduce a cross-sectional flow area such that a desired predetermined amount of back pressure is generated in the flow control device 58. These flow paths may be formed on an inner surface 70 of the tool 50. A sleeve 72 may be used to enclose and seal the flow paths such that fluid is forced to flow along these flow paths. These features may be configured to generate a specified pressure drop such that a back pressure is applied to the channels 64. The applied back pressure forces the fluid to flow into the upper bore 52 as described in greater detail below. The valve element 62 may be a one-way valve configured to allow flow from the lower bore 48 and block flow from channels 64, i.e., uni-directional flow. The valve element 62 may also utilize a biased piston that opens when a preset pressure differential is present between the bore 48 and the channels 64; e.g., a pressure in the bore 48 that exceeds the pressure in the channels 64 by a preset value.
In the circulation mode, the tool 50 is positioned inside the production assembly 20. After the seal bore 57 has been activated, surface pumps may pump slurry down the bore 52 of the gravel pack tool 50. The slurry flows through the cross over port 56 and into the lower annulus 30. The slurry may include a fluid carrier such as water, oil, brine, epoxies or other fluids formulated to convey entrained solids or semi-solids. The fluid component of the slurry flows through the filtration elements 26 and into the lower bore 48. The solid or particulated components of the slurry pack into the lower annulus 30. The fluid component flows up the lower bore 48 and through the flow control device 58. Due to the relatively low fluid velocity, the fluid component may flow across both the valve element 62 and the flow control element 60. Thereafter, the fluid components flow to the surface via the channels 64, the ports 66, and the upper annulus 32. This circulation is maintained until a sufficient amount of particles, e.g., gravel, have been deposited into the lower annulus 30. Thus, during a circulation mode, the tool 50 is positioned and configured to have a specified flow path for the gravel slurry material. As used herein, the term “flow path” refers to a structure that allows fluid to flow through rather than collect.
Referring now to
The valve element 62 may be configured to prevent fluid flow during reverse circulation, which then forces the fluid to flow across the flow control element 60. Because a relatively high fluid flow rate is used during reverse circulation, the flow control element 60 generates a back pressure across the channels 64 which acts to restrict fluid flow. Thus, most of the fluid passes through the cross over port 56. In other situations, the valve element 62 may intentionally or inadvertently fail to close. In such situations, the flow control element 60 still provides a mechanism to generate a back pressure in the passages 64. Reverse circulation is maintained until the bore 52 and other downhole components are cleaned of slurry. It should be understood that in certain embodiments, the valve element 62 may be omitted.
In embodiments, the slurry is circulated at a slower flow rate than the cleaning fluid. Because of the higher flow rate of the cleaning fluid, a greater back pressure is generated by the flow control element 62.
After reverse circulation has been completed, the gravel pack tool 50 may be repositioned at another location in the wellbore to perform a subsequent gravel pack operation. For example, the tool 50 may be moved from the formation 14 to the formation 16. Each subsequent operation may be performed as generally described previously. It should be appreciated that as the gravel pack tool 50 is pushed into the well 10, the fluid residing in the well 10 can bypass the valve 54 via the flow control element 60. Thus, “surge” effect can be minimized. Surge effect is a pressure increase downhole of a moving tool caused by an obstruction in a bore. Also, as the tool 50 is pulled out of the well, the fluid uphole of the tool 50 can by bypass the valve 54 via the flow control element 60. Thus, “swab” effect can be minimized. Swab effect is a pressure decrease downhole of a moving tool caused by an obstruction in a bore.
As stated previously, the teachings of the present disclosure may be utilized in connection with any downhole tool that utilizes flow control devices. Such flow control devices may be used in connection with tools that set packers, slips, perform pressure tests, etc. Also, such flow control devices may be used in drilling systems.
The foregoing description is directed to particular embodiments of the present invention for the purpose of illustration and explanation. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that many modifications and changes to the embodiment set forth above are possible without departing from the scope and the spirit of the invention. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such modifications and changes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1362552 | Alexander et al. | Dec 1920 | A |
1649524 | Hammond | Nov 1927 | A |
1915867 | Penick | Jun 1933 | A |
1984741 | Harrington | Dec 1934 | A |
2119563 | Wells | Mar 1937 | A |
2089477 | Halbert | Aug 1937 | A |
2214064 | Niles | Sep 1940 | A |
2257523 | Combs | Jan 1941 | A |
2412841 | Spangler | Dec 1946 | A |
2762437 | Egan et al. | Jan 1955 | A |
2810352 | Tumilson | Oct 1957 | A |
2942668 | Maly et al. | Nov 1957 | A |
2814947 | Stegemeier et al. | Dec 1957 | A |
2942541 | Maly et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
3326291 | Zandmer | Jun 1967 | A |
3385367 | Kollsman | May 1968 | A |
3419089 | Venghiattis | Dec 1968 | A |
3451477 | Kelley | Jun 1969 | A |
3675714 | Thompson | Jul 1972 | A |
3692064 | Hohnerlein et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3739845 | Berry et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3791444 | Hickey | Feb 1974 | A |
3876471 | Jones | Apr 1975 | A |
3918523 | Stuber | Nov 1975 | A |
3951338 | Genna | Apr 1976 | A |
3975651 | Griffiths | Aug 1976 | A |
3987854 | Callihan et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4153757 | Clark, III | May 1979 | A |
4173255 | Kramer | Nov 1979 | A |
4187909 | Erbstoesser | Feb 1980 | A |
4248302 | Churchman | Feb 1981 | A |
4250907 | Struckman et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4257650 | Allen | Mar 1981 | A |
4287952 | Erbstoesser | Sep 1981 | A |
4428428 | Smyrl et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4434849 | Allen | Mar 1984 | A |
4491186 | Alder | Jan 1985 | A |
4497714 | Harris | Feb 1985 | A |
4552218 | Ross et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4614303 | Moseley, Jr. et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4649996 | Kojicic | Mar 1987 | A |
4974674 | Wells | Dec 1990 | A |
4998585 | Newcomer et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5016710 | Renard et al. | May 1991 | A |
5132903 | Sinclair | Jul 1992 | A |
5156811 | White | Oct 1992 | A |
5333684 | Walter et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5337821 | Peterson | Aug 1994 | A |
5431346 | Sinaisky | Jul 1995 | A |
5435393 | Brekke et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435395 | Connell | Jul 1995 | A |
5439966 | Graham et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5586213 | Bridges | Dec 1996 | A |
5597042 | Tubel et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609204 | Rebardi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5673751 | Head et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5803179 | Echols et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5829522 | Ross et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5831156 | Mullins | Nov 1998 | A |
5839508 | Tubel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5873410 | Iato et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881809 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896928 | Coon | Apr 1999 | A |
5982801 | Deak | Nov 1999 | A |
6065535 | Ross | May 2000 | A |
6068015 | Pringle | May 2000 | A |
6098020 | Den Boer | Aug 2000 | A |
6112815 | Boe | Sep 2000 | A |
6112817 | Voll et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119780 | Christmas | Sep 2000 | A |
6253847 | Stephenson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6253861 | Charmichael et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273194 | Hiron et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6305470 | Woie | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338363 | Chen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6367547 | Towers | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371210 | Bode et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6419021 | George et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6446729 | Bixenman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464006 | Womble | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6505682 | Brockman | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516888 | Gunnarson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6581682 | Parent et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6622794 | Zisk, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6679324 | Den Boer et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6786285 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6789623 | Hill et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6817416 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840321 | Restarick et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6857476 | Richards | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863126 | McGlothen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6938698 | Coronado | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951252 | Restarick et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6976542 | Henriksen et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7011076 | Weldon et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7128151 | Corbett | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7185706 | Freyer | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7290606 | Coronado et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7322412 | Badalamenti et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7325616 | Lopez De Cardenas | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331388 | Vilela et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7395858 | Barbosa et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409999 | Henrikson et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7469743 | Richards | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7673678 | MacDougall et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7950454 | Patel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20020020527 | Kilaas et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030221834 | Hess et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040069489 | Corbett | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040140089 | Gunneroed | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144544 | Freyer | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040194971 | Thomson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050016732 | Brannon et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050082060 | Ward et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050126776 | Russell | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050178705 | Broyles et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189119 | Gynz-Rekowski | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050199298 | Farrington | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207279 | Chemali et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050241835 | Burris et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060042798 | Badalamenti et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060048936 | Fripp et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060048942 | Moen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076150 | Coronado et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060086498 | Wetzel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060108114 | Johnson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060175065 | Ross | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060185849 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060272814 | Broome et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060273876 | Pachla et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070012444 | Horgan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070039741 | Hailey, Jr. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044962 | Tibbles | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070068675 | Barry et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070131434 | MacDougall et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070246210 | Richards | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246213 | Hailey, Jr. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246225 | Hailey, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246407 | Richards et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070272408 | Zazovsky et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080035349 | Richard | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080035350 | Henriksen | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053662 | Williamson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080099194 | Clem | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135249 | Fripp et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149323 | O'Malley et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149351 | Marya et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080236839 | Oddie | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080236843 | Scott et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080283238 | Richards et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296023 | Willauer | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314590 | Patel | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090133869 | Clem | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133874 | Dale et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090139727 | Tanju et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090205834 | Garcia et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1385594 | Dec 2002 | CN |
1492345 | Nov 1977 | GB |
2341405 | Dec 2007 | GB |
59089383 | Jun 1984 | JP |
1335677 | Sep 1987 | SU |
WO 9403743 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO 0079097 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0165063 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0177485 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO02075110 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO2004018833 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2006015277 | Feb 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Optimization of Commingled Production Using Infinitely Variable Inflow Control Valves; M.M, J. J. Naus, Delft University of Technology (DUT), Shell International Exploration and production (SIEP); J.D. Jansen, DUT and SIEP; SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 26-29 Houston, Texas, 2004, Society of Patent Engineers. |
An Oil Selective Inflow Control System; Rune Freyer, Easy Well Solutions; Morten Fejerskkov, Norsk Hydro; Arve Huse, Altinex; European Petroleum Conference, Oct. 29-31, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, Copyright 2002, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc. |
Determination of Perforation Schemes to Control Production and Injection Profiles Along Horizontal; Asheim, Harald, Norwegian Institute of Technology; Oudeman, Pier, Koninklijke/Shell Exploratie en Producktie Laboratorium; SPE Drilling & Completion, vol. 12, No. 1, March; pp. 13-18; 1997 Society of Petroleum Engineers. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110056686 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |