The present invention generally relates to the field of storm water management and flood control. More particularly, the present invention relates to restricting the rate of storm water output from a drain pipe.
A storm drainage system is generally designed to accommodate and eliminate excessive amounts of storm water that might otherwise accumulate on roadways or flood homes. Typically, the storm drainage system channels the storm water from surface level where the potential for damage is high into underground pipes and/or cisterns where the storm water can be safely dissipated or stored for future dissipation. Such systems work well within design limits to protect the surface from flooding and the associated property damage and risk of harm associated therewith. However, a storm drainage system exposed to a flow of water beyond that which the system is designed to accommodate can be overloaded causing water to back up to the surface and potentially cause a flood.
Control of the rate at which storm water flows into or out of the storm drainage system can be important to prevent or inhibit such overload. For example, consider a first urban neighborhood having a modern storm drainage system designed to accommodate a tremendous volume of storm water. The first neighborhood is hit by a tremendous rainfall that is accommodated by the modern storm drainage system, and the storm water is channeled into drainage pipes to drain away from the first neighborhood as designed. A second nearby neighborhood has a storm drainage system interconnected with that of the first neighborhood. Unfortunately, the storm drainage system of the second neighborhood is incapable of accommodating the volume of water draining from the first neighborhood. Consequently, the storm drainage system of the second neighborhood becomes overloaded.
In this exemplary scenario, overload of the second neighborhood's storm drainage system makes it likely that the storm water would back up into the streets and homes and flood the second neighborhood. However, if the rate of flow of the storm water could be controlled at any stage between entering the drainage system of the first neighborhood and entering the drainage system of the second neighborhood, overload and flooding could be prevented. A need therefore exists for a device that can limit or restrict the rate of water flow into a storm drainage system to prevent overload of the system.
Storm pipes that comprise a typical storm drainage system are made from materials selected based on the size of the desired pipe, material strength, ease of handling, life expectancy, resistance to erosion, and cost, among other factors. Exemplary materials used in the construction of storm pipes include reinforced and non-reinforced concrete, corrugated polyethylene, corrugated polyvinyl chloride, and various grades of steel, as known in the art.
In one aspect of the present invention, a flow restrictor includes an exterior tube and an interior tube disposed within the exterior tube. A first flange is disposed at a distal end of the interior tube. An annular rib extends proximally from the first flange and has an interior diameter greater than an exterior diameter of the exterior tube. A second flange is disposed at a proximal end of the exterior tube. A ring member is disposed around the exterior tube between the annular rib of the first flange and the second flange.
In another aspect of the present invention, a flow restrictor includes an exterior tube and an interior tube disposed within the exterior tube. A first flange is disposed at a distal end of the interior tube. An annular rib extends proximally from the first flange and has an interior diameter greater than an exterior diameter of the exterior tube. A second flange is disposed at a proximal end of the exterior tube. A ring member is disposed around the exterior tube between the annular rib of the first flange and the second flange. A fastener holds the annular rib of the first flange in contact with the second flange via the ring member.
In a further aspect of the present invention, a flow restrictor includes an exterior tube and an interior tube disposed within the exterior tube. A first flange is disposed at a distal end of the interior tube. An annular rib extends proximally from the first flange and has an interior diameter greater than an exterior diameter of the exterior tube. A second flange is disposed at a proximal end of the exterior tube and extends radially beyond the first flange of the interior tube. A ring member is disposed around the exterior tube between the annular rib of the first flange and the second flange. A fastener provides mechanical communication between the interior tube and the exterior tube such that the ring member is in contact with the exterior tube and uncompressed in a first state and the ring member is longitudinally compressed by the fastener between the annular rib of the first flange and the second flange in a second state.
The scope of the invention is indicated in the appended claims. It is intended that all changes or modifications within the meaning and range of equivalents are embraced by the claims. The features and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments, read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The detailed description and drawings are merely illustrative of the invention rather than limiting, the scope of the invention being defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
The present invention is directed to a device that may be attached to a storm drain outlet to limit or restrict the rate of water flowing out of the storm drain. Referring to
The flow restrictor 50 is illustrated in
A ring member 80 includes a luminal or interior surface 82 and an abluminal or exterior surface 84. The ring member 80 is disposed over the exterior tube 74 such that the luminal surface 82 of the ring member 80 is disposed around and in contact with the exterior tube 74. An annular rib 102 extends proximally from the flange 64 and has an interior diameter greater than an exterior diameter of the exterior tube 74. When assembled, the ring member 80 is disposed between the annular rib 102 and the second flange 76 and the second flange 76 extends radially beyond the exterior surface 84 of the ring member 80. In a first or relaxed state, as depicted in
An annular cross-section of the ring member 80 is illustrated in
Referring to
The force of compression causing the ring member to diametrically expand and form a seal against a constraining surface, as above-described, is provided by forced relative translation of the first flange 64 toward the second flange 76. The first and second flanges 64, 76 can be forced together by a fastener 86 that provides mechanical communication between the first flange 64 and the second flange 76. The fastener 86 can encompass any of several distinct embodiments as illustrated in the FIGS. and described further below.
Returning to
In one embodiment, the fastener 86 is a nut 86, which is configured to include threads 88 on a luminal surface 90 thereof. An exterior or abluminal surface 68 of the interior tube 62 includes threads 70, which are complementary to the threads 88 such that the nut 86 may be threadably attached to the interior tube 62. Tightening the nut 86 forces relative translation of the first and second flanges 64, 76 toward one another.
Referring to
In another embodiment (not shown), the fastener 86 may comprise a fastening member on each of the first and second members 60, 72 or tubes 62, 74. For example, one or more buttons or protrusions (not shown) could extend outwardly from the exterior surface 68 of the interior tube 62. One or more check-mark shaped bayonet slots (not shown), each having a first portion disposed at a non-orthogonal angle relative to the longitudinal axis 92 and a second portion disposed generally parallel to the longitudinal axis, could be formed into an interior surface of the outer tube 74. Subsequent to longitudinal alignment of each button with a corresponding bayonet slot, application of a relative torque between the interior tube 62 and the second flange 76 drives each button proximally in each slot, resulting in the forced translation of the first flange 64 toward the second flange 76.
In a further embodiment of a flow restrictor 250 illustrated in
In another embodiment of a flow restrictor 350 illustrated in
Subsequent to insertion of the interior tube 62 through the exterior tube 74, the ridges 126 engage the gear 116 while slipping proximally past the pawl 122. The ratcheting lever arm 114 engages the gear 116 when rotated from a first position as illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
Another embodiment of a flow restrictor 550 is illustrated in
Yet another embodiment of a flow restrictor 650 is illustrated in
The present invention should not be considered limited to the particular embodiments and examples described above, but rather should be understood to cover all aspects of the invention as fairly set out in the attached claims. For example, the flow restrictor embodiments 50, 250, 350, 550, 650 may also include the central depression 152, or the flow restrictor embodiments 50, 150, 250, 350, 550, 650 may also include the tapered portion 252 of the annular rib 102, and/or the tapered portion 254 of the ring member 80. Further, any of the fastener 86 embodiments described hereinabove may be used interchangeably, as appropriate, with any combination of the first and second members 60, 72 and the ring member 80.
The interior and exterior members 60, 72 and the fastener 86 are generally rigid components and may be made from any rigid material that can be mechanically stressed without deformation. Portions of each of the rigid components may experience bending stress, which is a combination of both compression and tension. The rigid components can be manufactured from solid blocks of material having non-essential material left in place, or may be manufactured from relatively thin-walled material omitting portions of each component that may be non-essential. For example, the nut 86 may be manufactured to be solid between the interior surface 90 and an exterior surface of the nut 86, as depicted, for example, in
Therefore, factors to consider in selection of the rigid material are the size of the rigid components, the weight of the material, material strength, ease of handling, ease of manufacture, life expectancy, resistance to erosion or corrosion, cost of raw materials, and cost of manufacture, among other factors. Material suitable for use in fabrication of the rigid components include by way of example and not limitation, metals or alloys such as stainless steel, thermoplastics, or glass reinforced nylons.
A flow restrictor device is presented that provides for simple attachment to a drain pipe for the purpose of restricting the flow of water therefrom. Such a simply attached device has great utility in the prevention of flood damage caused by the overloading of flood control systems.
While the present invention has been described with reference to its preferred embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art will understand and appreciate that variations in materials, dimensions, geometries, and fabrication methods may be or become known in the art, yet still remain within the scope of the present invention which is limited only by the claims appended hereto. The exclusive rights to all modifications which come within the scope of the appended claims are reserved.
The present application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/351,211, filed Jun. 3, 2010, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
402600 | Kemp | May 1889 | A |
1955628 | Gaillard et al. | Apr 1934 | A |
2271764 | Heil | Feb 1942 | A |
2475748 | Leroy | Jul 1949 | A |
3018799 | Hartzell et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3457959 | Cooper | Jul 1969 | A |
3494504 | Jackson | Feb 1970 | A |
3517700 | Zee et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3613936 | Kaiser et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3687493 | Lock et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3998245 | Martin | Dec 1976 | A |
4000857 | Moen | Jan 1977 | A |
4303101 | Tholen | Dec 1981 | A |
4345694 | Chambers | Aug 1982 | A |
4505499 | Uglow et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4771810 | Ermold et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4830057 | Hendrickson | May 1989 | A |
4854543 | Daigle et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4874017 | Hendrickson | Oct 1989 | A |
4968197 | Chen | Nov 1990 | A |
4971117 | Hendrickson | Nov 1990 | A |
4976283 | Wildfang et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4986312 | Gute | Jan 1991 | A |
5027861 | Gute | Jul 1991 | A |
5035265 | Chen | Jul 1991 | A |
5090737 | Brammer et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5141029 | Naugle et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5230437 | Kelly | Jul 1993 | A |
5318073 | Kendrick et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5353501 | Naugle et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5373971 | Laffy et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5676719 | Stavropoulos et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
6003557 | Brelig et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6237891 | Stiner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6450505 | Gavin | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6609718 | Gavin | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6647682 | Bishop | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6832624 | Rippolone | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6883546 | Kobylinski | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6955251 | Kurita et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7278450 | Condon | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7311120 | Flanagan | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7546847 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7832773 | Krohn | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7997038 | Warnecke et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8146308 | Warnecke et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20040074549 | Allen | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070007025 | Nock et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070029349 | Glen | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20100147408 | Tyson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110232793 | Polivka et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130081730 | Schwartz | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
ExxonMobile Chemical, “Santoprene: Brand YPVs Design Guide for Termoplastic Vulcanizates (TPVs)” available at www.plasticstoday.com/sites/default/files/white%20paper—designing%20with%20TPEs.pdf pp. 1-35 (2009). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110297263 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61351211 | Jun 2010 | US |