The present disclosure relates generally to the field of data packet transmission over digital networks.
A protocol is a set of procedures for communications over a network. In the Internet Protocol (IP), information such as the IP addresses of the sender (source) and the receiver (destination) of the data packets is placed in a “header” positioned in front of the data. In Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6), which is an improved version of IPv4, a “flow label” field is included in the header. The flow label field plus the source and destination IP addresses can uniquely identify the data packets constituting a media flow in IPv6. With such an identifier for a media flow, packets can be differentiated and processed accordingly.
Among the problems that exist in the transmission of media streams over a digital network is how to allow routers to prioritize routing of certain media flows over other media flows, and the selection of physical resources (e.g., output interface) for a particular media flow. Solving these problems depends upon properly monitoring and attending to a media flow, which, in turn, requires the establishment of a flow state in IPv6. Unfortunately, establishing a flow state at the middle nodes in the transmission path is problematic.
The present disclosure will be understood more fully from the detailed description that follows and from the accompanying drawings, which however, should not be taken to limit the invention to the specific embodiments shown, but are for explanation and understanding only.
In the following description specific details are set forth, such as device types, system configurations, protocols, methods, etc., in order to provide a thorough understanding of the subject matter disclosed herein. However, persons having ordinary skill in the relevant arts will appreciate that these specific details may not be needed to practice the embodiments described.
In the context of the present application, a communications system or network is a geographically distributed collection of interconnected subnetworks (e.g., enterprise networks, access networks, core networks, etc.) for transporting data between nodes, such as intermediate nodes and end nodes (also referred to as endpoints). A local area network (LAN) is an example of such a subnetwork; a plurality of LANs may be further interconnected by an intermediate network node, such as a router, bridge, or switch, to extend the effective “size” of the computer network and increase the number of communicating nodes. Examples of the devices or nodes include servers, routers, switches, gateways, controllers (e.g., a Session Border Controller), and endpoint devices. The nodes typically communicate by exchanging discrete frames or packets of data according to predefined protocols.
A Session Border Controller (SBC) is a device used at a point of demarcation between one part of a network and another in a communications network to control signaling and usually also the media streams involved in setting up, conducting, and tearing down a media call (e.g., a voice over IP (VoIP) call). In the context of VoIP, each call consists of one or more signaling streams that control the call, and one or more media streams which carry the audio, video, or other media data along with information concerning how that data is flowing across the network. Together, these streams make up a media session, which consists of senders and receivers, as well as the media streams flowing between them.
The Session Description Protocol (SDP) documented in Request for Comments (RFC) 2327 is widely used as a platform or format to describe a media session. Description of a media session is typically encapsulated in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) documented in RFC 3261, or other session initiation protocols. In the context of the present disclosure, it should be understood that SDP may be used in a wide range of network environments and applications.
A gateway comprises a node or network element that provides a translation function between different networks. For example, a gateway may be a device that can connect and provide communications between a private branch exchange (PBX) switching system of an enterprise and an IP network. Gateways typically perform translations between the different transmission formats and communication procedures. In addition, a gateway may also support communications with, and translations between, endpoints and/or terminals operating in accordance with different protocols. A middle media node may also comprise a gateway device in the context of the present disclosure.
An IP-PBX is a private branch exchange (telephone switching system within an enterprise) that switches calls between VoIP (voice over Internet Protocol or IP) users on local lines while allowing users to share a certain number of external phone lines. An IP-PBX may also switch calls between a VoIP user and a traditional telephone user, or between two traditional telephone users in the same way that a traditional PBX does. In the context of the present application, an endpoint may comprise a telephone device (such as a VoIP or SIP phone), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a laptop or notebook computer, or any other device (including a gateway device), network node, component, element, or object capable of initiating or participating in voice, video, gaming, text, or other media packet-data exchanges via a communication network.
Overview
According to one embodiment, a generally-applicable mechanism for media monitoring is provided that utilizes one or more attributes added in the media description section of a SDP (RFC2327) media session. The attributes permit the establishment of a media-stats flow state to produce statistics (stats) for a media flow of interest. The new attributes are defined to communicate both the flow label and the statistical requirements associated between intended media nodes. In a specific embodiment, the attributes communicate the label of the media flow from its original sender to all receiver nodes as well as to all the media nodes residing on the media transmission path. That is, media stats are provided at all or some of the media nodes (including voice gateways, routers, SBCs, and other types of middle nodes) along the flow path. The media stats are not restricted to any specific media transport protocol e.g. Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP).
Referring to
Other fields shown in IP header 10 include a version (“Ver”) field, which indicates the protocol version, i.e., version 6; a Traffic Class byte field used by the source and other nodes (e.g., routers) to identify packets belonging to the same traffic class, thus distinguishing between packets having different priorities; a next header field, which identifies the type of header immediately following IP header 10; a hop limit field that indicates the maximum number of nodes (hops) that a packet can cross before reaching its destination (this field is decremented by one for each node that the packet crosses; when the hop limit field reaches zero, the packet is discarded); a 128-bit source address field that contains the address of the originator of the packet; and a 128-bit destination address field, which is the address in the intended recipient or receiver of the packet.
The Flow Label field shown in the example of
At the far right-hand side of
It is appreciated that although only one carrier/service network is shown in
In accordance with one embodiment, a media session may consist of participants being a sender, a receiver, or both. Description of a media session is encapsulated in SIP (RFC3261) or other session initiation protocols. One or more attributes are added in the media description section of an SDP session to communicate the flow label of a media flow from its original sender to all the media nodes sitting on the media path and the receivers. If a media session contains two or more senders, each sender allocates a separate flow label of the media flow originated from the sender. If a sender generates multiple media flows, that sender should allocate one flow label for each flow, and communicate the allocated flow label to others through its corresponding media description in the SDP session.
In one implementation, the following media-level attribute is defined in this invention to communicate a flow label:
Practitioners in the art will further appreciate that the first line in
The flow stats attributes shown above can be added or removed by any middle node (under carrier control) in the media path that the RTP stream traverses, e.g., a voice gateway, IP-to-IP gateway, or SBC device. In other words, such flow stat attributes can be added and removed by a carrier/service provider's ingress and egress SBCs in order to monitor the media flow state within a service provider network. To increase granularity of media monitoring, the ingress SBCs may further convey the flow state into routers located in the media path between the ingress and egress SBCs via various header options embedded in the IPv6 destination options header. It is appreciated that with the use of the above flows stats attributes, both the ingress and egress SBCs are able to establish the flow state to perform measurements and record media flow stats.
Once a flow state has been established, it can be cancelled or modified by resending the SDP session without the unwanted flowlabel and flowstats attributes. Alternatively, a new flow without the flowlabel and flowstats attributes may be used for the cancellation purpose. Another possibility is to simply set the flow label value field for each flow to zero to disassociate the flow state previously established.
The example of
Thus, in this manner described above, under carrier control, a gateway, PE, or other SBC device can remove or add flow state attributes used to measure and generate media flow statistics—or turn off the flow state feature entirely—before passing the flow out to the next node or hop in the media path.
Node 60 may also comprise other hardware/software modules 64 coupled to system bus 66 for performing additional functions. For example, modules 64 may include software, firmware, or logic embedded in hardware for implementing any of the functions described herein, e.g., those functions associated with establishing a flow state, media monitoring utilizing certain measurements, passing of attributes, performing operations upon media packets, etc. (In the context of the present application, therefore, the term “module” is to be understood as being synonymous with both hardware devices and computer-executable software code, programs or routines.)
It should be further understood that elements of the present invention may also be provided as a computer program product which may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions which may be used to program a computer (e.g., a processor or other electronic device) to perform a sequence of operations. Alternatively, the operations may be performed by a combination of hardware and software. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnet or optical cards or other type of machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions.
Additionally, although the present invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments, numerous modifications and alterations are well within the scope of the present invention. For instance, although various RTP-based algorithms have been used in illustrative examples, it is appreciated that the same methods and functions described herein are generally applicable to media applications that are not RTP based. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4684872 | Stewart | Aug 1987 | A |
5953049 | Horn et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6016430 | Shinomiya | Jan 2000 | A |
6044081 | Bell et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6253270 | Ajanovic et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275889 | Saito | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6545979 | Poulin | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6590867 | Ash et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6628608 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6771644 | Brassil et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6876632 | Takeda | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6947417 | Laursen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7310334 | FitzGerald et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7422330 | Magarill | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7936695 | Oran | May 2011 | B2 |
20020014282 | Andersson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020051464 | Sin et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020176404 | Girard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186661 | Santiago et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030016627 | MeLampy et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035384 | Cline et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030076850 | Jason, Jr. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030163272 | Kaburlasos et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040052259 | Garcia et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073641 | Minhazuddin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073690 | Hepworth et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078811 | Urdang | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040196840 | Amrutur et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213152 | Matuoka et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050007959 | Tomonaga et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050091190 | Klemets | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050219151 | Li et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060077891 | Smith et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060291450 | Ramachandran et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008896 | Green et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070121523 | Morandin | May 2007 | A1 |
20070192459 | Horimoto et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080215704 | Curcio et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080267185 | Biskner | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
T. Friedman et al., RFC 3611—RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports, Nov. 2003, Abstract, Section 4.6 pp. 21-24. |
M. Handley et al., RFC 4566—SDP: Session Description Protocol, Jul. 2006, pp. 1, 8, 9, 21, 22. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090052458 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |