1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to devices and methods for imparting fluid flow through bores, and more particularly, to bores having entrance edge variation which effects flow-field behavior in various fluid-flow applications.
2. Description of Related Art
A flow directing apparatus which includes a bore for directing the fluid flow can be sensitive to variation in entrance edge conditions at a leading edge of the bore, and thus produce significant unwanted variation in flow-field behavior and flow rate. In addition, manufacturing processes can exacerbate variation in the entrance edge conditions. For example, deburring processes and tooling limitations in applications which require tight tolerances can impact a, bore's geometry at its leading edge, especially when the bore is drilled at an angle relative to a flat surface, or directly through convex or concave surfaces.
Conventional flow directing apparatuses and methods which utilize bores for metering and controlling fluid flow-field behavior have generally been considered satisfactory for their intended purpose. However, there is still a need in the art for improving the control and consistency of such metering and flow-field behavior.
A flow directing apparatus for directing fluid flow is provided along with a method for manufacturing the same. The flow directing apparatus includes a flow body defining a bore therethrough configured and adapted to direct fluid flowing therethrough. The bore includes an outlet and an opposed inlet with an enlargement configured and adapted to reduce sensitivity to entrance-edge conditions for the bore. In certain embodiments, the enlargement of the inlet includes at least one of a countersink having a larger cross-sectional area than that of the bore downstream of the countersink, and/or a chamfer having a depth corresponding to the square root of a cross-sectional area of the bore.
The flow body includes an inlet surface in which the inlet of the bore is defined, and an opposed outlet surface in which the outlet of the bore is defined. In certain embodiments, the bore can define a longitudinal axis that is angled relative to at least one of the inlet and outlet surfaces for imparting swirl to the fluid flowing therethrough.
In certain embodiments, the bore is cylindrical, and the enlargement of the inlet thereof includes the chamfer. The chamfer can be defined along a chamfer axis substantially perpendicular to the inlet surface, and can have a chamfer angle of about 45° relative to the inlet surface and/or the bore downstream of the chamfer. The chamfer can additionally or alternatively have a depth larger than about 15% of the bore diameter.
In certain embodiments, the enlargement of the inlet of the bore includes the countersink, and the countersink has a diameter between about 30% and about 75% greater than that of the bore downstream of the countersink. The countersink can have a depth sufficient to penetrate beyond the entire original entrance edge of the bore. The depth can be about 15% to about 100% of the diameter of the bore downstream of the countersink.
In accordance with certain embodiments, the flow body defines a plurality of bores between the inlet and outlet surfaces of the flow body. Each of the plurality of bores can be configured and adapted to impart swirl on a fluid flowing therethrough, and includes an outlet and an opposed inlet with an enlargement configured and adapted to reduce sensitivity to entrance-edge conditions for the bore. Each of the bores includes an enlargement as described above, and may be formed in accordance with any of the embodiments and features described above.
The invention also includes a method or process for forming a flow directing apparatus as described above. The method or process includes forming the bore through the flow body with the enlargement by forming at least one of a countersink and a chamfer in a blank.
In certain embodiments, the countersink is formed using a boring device selected from the group consisting of a ball-nosed end-mill, a flat end-mill, and a drill. The countersink can be created in the blank prior to formation of the bore downstream thereof using a ball-nosed end-mill with a diameter about 30% to about 75% greater than the diameter of the bore downstream of the countersink. In certain embodiments, the chamfer is formed using a chamfering bit after spot-facing the blank with an endmill and after forming the bore therethrough.
These and other features of the systems and methods of the subject invention will become more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the drawings.
So that those skilled in the art to which the subject invention appertains will readily understand how to make and use the devices and methods of the subject invention without undue experimentation, preferred embodiments thereof will be described in detail herein below with reference to certain figures, wherein:
These and other features of the systems and methods of the subject invention will become more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the drawings.
Reference will now be made to the drawings wherein like reference numerals identify similar structural features or aspects of the subject invention. For purposes of explanation and illustration, and not limitation, a partial view of an exemplary embodiment of a flow directing apparatus in accordance with the invention is shown in
The flow directing apparatus 100 includes a flow body 102 defining a plurality of bores 104 therethrough. Each bore 104 includes an outlet 106 and an opposed inlet 108 with an enlargement 110 configured and adapted to reduce sensitivity to entrance-edge conditions for the bore 104. The flow body 102 includes an inlet surface 112 in which the inlet 108 of bore 104 is defined, and an opposed outlet surface 114 in which the outlet 106 of the bore 104 is defined. As shown, the enlargement 110 is formed as a chamfer 111 which has a larger cross-sectional area than that of the bore 104 downstream of the chamfer 111. The bores 104 are generally cylindrical in shape, and configured and adapted to impart swirl on a fluid flowing therethrough (e.g., for imparting swirl to air flowing in a gas turbine engine fuel injector). Bores of alternate shapes and/or which do not impart swirl may alternatively or additionally be utilized in other fuel systems or other applications in accordance with the present invention. Such applications include, for example, hydraulic equipment, medical devices such as insulin pumps and dialysis machines, plumbing, and food processing equipment. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that in most cylindrical-hole air swirlers on gas-turbine engines, the entrance shape of the cylindrical bores is not circular. Instead, an oblate shape is generally formed because the bores are usually not drilled perpendicular to the entrance surface. This geometry may make it difficult to form a radially constant chamfer size through the inlet surface 112. However, the critical portion of the edge of the bore 104 is the one where the fluid flow must turn the greatest degree (e.g., the most acute/sharp edge of the oblate shaped entrance to the cylindrical hole). This portion of the edge and the upstream portion of the cylindrical bore 104 (absent the chamfer 111) is shown in phantom in
As shown schematically in
The discharge coefficient of air in the cylindrical bore varies less significantly once the depth of the chamfer exceeds 15% of the bore diameter downstream of the chamfer. For example, using a 0.031 inch diameter bore, the increase in discharge coefficient of air in the cylindrical bore varies minimally with the increase in chamfer depth once the chamfer depth is over 0.005 inches.
Continuing with
Referring again to
With reference now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
It has been determined by the inventors that a ball-nose end-mill, as opposed to a drill-point, yields a higher flow-rate and reduced flow sensitivity for a given end-mill size. Ball-nosed end-mills of diameter about 30%-75% greater than that of the bore can be used to increase the discharge coefficient by about 13%-23%. The inventors have found that a diameter ratio (ratio of end-mill diameter to bore diameter) of 1.6 yields better results than a diameter ratio of 1.3, and that a ball-nose end-mill with a 1.6 diameter ratio has a very low sensitivity to entrance-edge condition of the countersink. Similarly, drills of diameter of about 30%-75% greater than that of the bore can be used to increase the discharge coefficient by about 13%-20%.
It will be appreciated that by including some form of enlargement (e.g., chamfer or counter-sink) at the lead-in (e.g., the inlet surface), the variability in flow from bore to bore is greatly reduced, and has been found by the inventors to be less than about 5%, largely due to variations in edge-breaks leading into the counter-bores, for example.
Turning now to
While described above in the exemplary context of circular geometry, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that non-circular geometries can also be used without departing from the scope of the invention. In the case of a non-circular bore, the desired depth of a particular enlargement will also be proportional to and correspond to the square root of a cross-sectional area of the bore downstream of the enlargement.
To form a flow directing apparatus as described in the above embodiments, initially, a blank (e.g., a part with no holes drilled in it) can be machined with a ball-nose counter-bore (e.g., a countersink as described above) with a pre-determined diameter and depth. The countersink can be followed with a cylindrical through-hole of specified size. The entrance and exit of the holes can be sufficiently deburred to remove visible burrs. The part may then be checked to determine whether the part functions in accordance with flow specifications. If not (e.g., if the flow rate is marginally low), the entrance to the counter-bore may be chamfered. Finally, the transition edge between the ball-nose formed countersink and the smaller cylindrical hole may be deburred/chamfered as needed for a given application.
To form the countersink 411 and slot 404 of
In certain embodiments, forming the enlargement includes forming the countersink in a flow directing apparatus blank using a ball-nosed end-mill with a diameter about 30% to about 75% greater than the diameter of the bore downstream of the countersink.
The methods and systems of the present invention, as described above and shown in the drawings, provide for improved flow directing apparatuses with superior properties including better control and consistency of flow-field behavior and flow rate through such flow directing apparatuses. It will readily be appreciated that liquid or gas flow may be used with the devices and teachings described above without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
While the apparatus and methods of the subject invention have been shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that changes and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the subject invention. For example, while particular shapes, sizes, dimensions, proportions, and orientations of bore holes, chamfers, and countersinks have been disclosed, it will be appreciated that other shapes, sizes, dimensions, proportions, and orientations may be utilized. It will also be appreciated that greater control and consistency of flow-field behavior and flow rate using the present invention may be achieved whether the fluid flow is gaseous, liquid, or both, and whether the application is for gas turbine fuel injectors or other technologies. Thus, it will be appreciated that changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope as claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2928611 | Lauderback | Mar 1960 | A |
20030080215 | Hurley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20120228405 | Buelow et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130200179 | Buelow et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
United Kingdom Search Report dated Jun. 11, 2014, issued on corresponding United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB 1322027.2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140166143 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |