Flue gas recirculation system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6247917
  • Patent Number
    6,247,917
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 16, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 19, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for improving the economics of flue gas recirculation. In particular, the present invention relates to an apparatus for the minimization of oxides of nitrogen (“NOx”) in the exhaust gas of various combustion processes via balanced pressure drops of the recirculation gas, and a method for the calculation of flue gas recirculation percentage. The flue gas recirculation system achieves the balanced pressure drops by sizing the air intake line and recirculation line associated with the system.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for improving the economics of flue gas recirculation. In particular, the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for the minimization of oxides of nitrogen (“NO


x


”) in the exhaust gas of various combustion processes.




2. Related Art




The minimization of oxides of nitrogen (“NO


x


”) in the exhaust gas of various combustion processes has been mandated by pollution control agencies throughout the country. Oilfield steam generators represent one of many industrial combustion processes where implementation of NO


x


control has become widespread. One of the ways in which NO


x


control is accomplished is to recirculate a percentage of the flue gas, or exhaust gas, (often 10%-20%) to mix with the inlet air.




The conventional NO


x


control systems, which utilize Flue Gas Recirculation (“FGR”), are extremely costly to manufacture, operate, and maintain due to the elaborate control systems that are required for effective performance of the system. Additionally, such systems, while substantially increasing generator operating cost, typically reduce the effective generator capacity.




One method of controlling the flue gas recirculation percentage is to provide control valves within the system to adjust the mixture of ambient air and flue gas to obtain a desired percentage. In the system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,040,470, the percentage of recirculated flue gas in the air inlet stream must be controlled to a reasonable precision. If this percentage is too high, generator output is reduced. If the percentage is too low, NO


x


reduction is insufficient. In this system, a control valve in the recirculation line is used to control the amount of flue gas recirculation. This valve works in tandem with the main air inlet valve, which controls the ambient air inlet rate. The main air inlet valve disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,040,070 is itself a replacement for adjustable dampers, which are typically located between the blower and the burner section on units without NO


x


control. Under typical operating conditions, the main air inlet valve will be a source of significant frictional pressure drop, which must be overcome with additional energy consumption at the blower. To monitor the recirculation percentage, oxygen sensors are utilized. These sensors are used to monitor the percentage of flue gas recirculation, providing feedback to a recirculation rate control valve. The oxygen sensors add significantly to the expense of the system.




Conventional systems use active control in order to reach and maintain a selected recirculation percentage. Active control involves constant adjustment of control valves, and heat exchangers in order to operate the system at the selected recirculation percentage. Operators annually change valve settings or damper positions. In other systems, sensors integrated with control systems cause the system to alter relative valve positions and thermal conditions of the system in order to maintain the selected recirculation percentage. This active control adds significantly to the installation and operational costs of NO


x


control systems.




Other patents disclose controlling flue gas recirculation through an elaborate array of specialized burners, fans and dampers that alter the temperature of the flue gas in order to reduce noxious emissions. Such a system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,659,305. This system uses conventional dampers and air diffusers, in conjunction with a recirculation fan, to enable the flue gas to be recirculated.




It is also desirable to calculate the flue gas recirculation percentage for monitoring purposes. Several conventional methods exist to calculate the percentage of flue gas recirculation (FGR). For example, oxygen sensors have been used to monitor the amount of oxygen in the combustion air. The percentage of FGR is then calculated from the oxygen sensor readings. However, the oxygen sensors are costly to install and maintain. Monitoring the flue gas recirculation percentage has also been achieved by metering the flow rate of the flue gas returned, or by performing a material balance using the temperature at different points in the system. However, the equations utilized to perform these calculations typically amount to a rough approximation of the actual flue gas recirculation percentage. The equations are generally inaccurate because they do not account for the heat added to the system by the mechanical inefficiencies in the blower.




Thus, there is a need in the art for a simple and inexpensive system for controlling flue gas recirculation percentage to minimize NO


x


emissions. Particularly, there is a need in the art for a system that eliminates the need for active control to maintain a selected flue gas recirculation percentage. There is a further need in the art for an improved method for calculating flue gas recirculation (FGR) percentage for monitoring purposes.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention solves the problems with, and overcomes the disadvantages of conventional systems for flue gas recirculation and conventional methods of calculating the flue gas recirculation percentage.




The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for improving the economics of flue gas recirculation. In particular, the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for the minimization of oxides of nitrogen (“NO


x


”) in the exhaust gas of various combustion processes via passively maintaining balanced pressure drops of the recirculation gas.




In one aspect of the present invention, a flue gas recirculation system is provided. The system is used with a combustion generator for providing a selected percentage of flue gas recirculation. The system includes an exhaust stack for exhausting flue gas from the combustion generator. The exhaust stack has a stack inlet which is coupled to the combustion generator, a stack outlet which exhausts flue gas to the atmosphere, and a take off point. The take off point is a point along the exhaust stack between the stack inlet and the stack outlet. The system further includes a recirculation line that has a recirculation inlet which is coupled to the take off point, and a recirculation outlet. There is an air inlet line for providing air to the combustion generator. The air inlet line has an air inlet which is open to the atmosphere, and an air outlet which is coupled to the combustion generator. The recirculation outlet is coupled to the air inlet line at a combination point. The combination point is a point along the air inlet line between the air inlet and the air outlet. The air inlet line is sized relative to the size of the recirculation line such that the air inlet pressure drop plus the exhaust stack pressure drop equals the recirculation line pressure drop, thereby providing the selected percentage of flue gas recirculation.




The recirculation system may further be provided with a line having an inlet and an outlet. The outlet is coupled to the combustion generator and the inlet is coupled to a blower. The blower may have a variable speed drive.




In order to monitor the flue gas recirculation percentage, in another aspect of the invention, temperature sensors are provided in the recirculation system. The first temperature sensor is placed in the air inlet line. The second temperature sensor is placed in the recirculation line. The third temperature sensor is placed in the line connecting the blower and the combustion generator burner section. The temperatures are measured, and the flue gas recirculation percentage is calculated according to an equation which accounts for heat added to the system due to mechanical inefficiencies in the blower.




The flue gas recirculation percentage is calculated by using the temperature sensors described above. Three temperatures are measured: first temperature (T


1


) at the first temperature sensor; a second temperature (T


2


) at the second temperature sensor; and a third temperature (T


3


) at the third temperature sensor. A temperature factor (T


3


′) is then calculated by subtracting the temperature of the blower from T


3


. Finally, the flue gas recirculation percentage is calculated using the following equation:






FGR
=


(


1.015
*

T
3



-

T
1


)


(


1.087
*

T
2


-

1.015
*

T
3




)












Accordingly, the present invention provides a system for flue gas recirculation wherein the recirculation is achieved by balanced pressure drops without active control of the system. The present invention further provides a method for calculating the flue gas recirculation percentage which takes into account the ambient effects of the system and the surrounding environment.




FEATURES AND ADVANTAGES




The invention provides a simple apparatus for flue gas recirculation and a method of calculating the flue gas recirculation percentage. The system is configured such that no active control is required to perform the flue gas recirculation. The system of the present application passively recirculates flue gas through balanced pressure drops that occur naturally as a consequence of the system design and parameters. Consequently, this passive system can typically be installed for 10% of the cost of existing systems. The system and method of the present invention simplifies operational control and compliance monitoring as compared with conventional systems.




Because the present system does not require an air inlet control valve, it is possible to utilize the balanced pressure drop approach to achieve simple, reliable control of the recirculation percentage. Considerable savings are obtained from not having to purchase and control an air inlet control valve.




The present invention can utilize a variable-speed drive for the blower to control the air inlet rate. The variable speed drive minimizes energy consumption.




Furthermore, the temperature sensors used in the system and method of the present invention are less costly and easier to use than the oxygen sensors of the conventional systems.




A simple pressure drop device, such an orifice plate or a manually operated butterfly valve, could be installed in the recirculation line to provide some adjustability to the system. However, once the desired recirculation percentage is obtained, on-line adjustment is not necessary.




Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description that follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned in practice of the invention.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the features, advantages, and principles of the invention.





FIG. 1

is a side-elevation view of one embodiment of the system of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a plan view of the system shown in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a side-elevation view of another embodiment of the system of the present invention.





FIG. 4

is a graph of results (Recirculation % as a function of time) using the system shown in FIG.


3


.





FIG. 5

is a graph of steam generator performance (oxides of nitrogen in parts per million (ppm) as a function of Flue Gas Recirculation (FGR%))using the system of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The exemplary embodiment of this invention is shown in some detail, although it will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art that some features which are not relevant to the invention may not be shown for the sake of clarity.




Referring first to

FIGS. 1 and 2

, there is illustrated an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The arrows displayed in the figures are indicative of the airflow and gas flow direction.




A typical combustion generator


20


is coupled to a flue gas recirculation system shown generally by reference numeral


10


. A recirculation line


40


provides communication between an exhaust stack


30


of the combustion generator


20


and an air inlet line


50


of the recirculation system


10


. As would be readily apparent to one of skill in the relevant art, the combustion generator


20


comprises a burner section


22


, a generator section


24


, a convection section


26


, and exhaust stack


30


.




The air inlet line


50


has an air inlet


52


, which is open to the atmosphere, and an air outlet


54


which feeds into the combustion generator


20


.




The exhaust stack


30


has a stack inlet


32


, a stack outlet


34


and a take off point


36


. The stack inlet


32


is coupled to the combustion generator


20


and the stack outlet


34


is open to the atmosphere. The take off point


36


is disposed between the stack inlet


32


and the stack outlet


34


.




The recirculation line


40


has a recirculation inlet


42


and a recirculation outlet


44


. The recirculation inlet


42


is coupled to the take off point


36


and the recirculation outlet


44


is coupled to the air inlet line


50


at a point


56


between the air inlet


52


and the air outlet


54


, also known as the combination point


56


. The recirculation system


10


may also include a hose, or other type of line,


70


having a hose inlet


72


and a hose outlet


74


. The hose outlet


74


is connected to the combustion generator


20


at the burner section


22


. The hose inlet


72


is connected to a blower


60


disposed between the hose


70


and the air inlet line


50


. The blower


60


is coupled to the air outlet


54


and the hose inlet


72


. Blower


60


is preferably a variable speed drive blower.




In order to monitor the flue gas recirculation percentage, temperature sensors


1


,


2


,


3


are provided in the recirculation system


10


. The first temperature sensor


1


is placed in the air inlet line


50


. The second temperature sensor


2


is placed in the recirculation line


40


. The third temperature sensor


3


is placed in the hose


70


connecting the blower


60


and the combustion generator burner section


22


.




In order to force air to recirculate, the pressure at the combination point


56


must be less than that at the takeoff point


36


. Since the stack


30


is typically designed to provide little frictional resistance to the exhausting flue gas, this implies that the blower


60


must operate to create a vacuum at the combination point


56


. Therefore, the air inlet line


50


must be sized small enough to provide some frictional resistance to airflow, even at low firing rates. This is what drives the exhaust gas through the recirculation line


40


. However, this pressure drop will be much less than required for a system employing a control valve on the air inlet line


50


or adjustable dampers, which results in an appreciable energy savings. Pressure drop balance refers to the fact that the amount of recirculation flue gas will be determined from the following equation:






Air Inlet pressure drop+Stack pressure drop=Flue Gas Recirculation line pressure drop






Each of these pressure drops is, essentially, proportional to velocity squared. Thus, as the firing rate changes, each of these three pressure drops will go up (or down) in the same proportion. Thus, the diameter and length of the air inlet line


50


can be sized relative to the length and diameter of recirculation line


40


to provide a selected percentage of flue gas recirculation without active control of the system


10


. The size and the shape of the air inlet line


50


can vary as long as the pressure drop ratio is sufficient to achieve the selected flue gas recirculation percentage.




By sizing the air inlet line


50


and the recirculation line


40


, a pressure drop is achieved which allows the flue gas to recirculate to reduce NO


x


emissions. In order to fine tune the system


10


, a simple pressure drop device


80


, such as an orifice plate or a manually operated butterfly valve, can be installed. This pressure drop device


80


needs to be adjusted up to the point that the selected recirculation percentage is achieved. Upon reaching that point, further adjustment is not required.




The system


10


of the present invention reaches a steady-state operating condition where the pressures at the combination point


56


and the take off point


36


are maintained such that the condition of the system


10


does not change over time. Any change in pressure that does take place at either of the points will be continually balanced by a corresponding change in pressure at the other point. Particularly, air inlet line


50


is sized relative to recirculation line


40


such that the air inlet pressure drop (at combination point


56


) plus the stack pressure drop (at take off point


36


) equals the recirculation line


40


pressure drop. In this manner, the system


10


of the present invention passively maintains this steady-state condition of the selected percentage of flue gas recirculation. No active control of the system


10


, such as operation of valves or dampers, is required to maintain the operation of the system and, accordingly, the selected recirculation percentage.




As noted above, in order to monitor the flue gas recirculation percentage, temperature sensors


1


,


2


,


3


are installed in the system


10


. The first temperature sensor


1


is installed in the air inlet line


50


, above the combination point


56


as shown in FIG.


1


. This allows the temperature of the ambient air to be measured. The second temperature sensor


2


is installed in the recirculation line


40


. This allows the temperature of the flue gas to be measured at a point prior to reaching the combination point


56


. The third temperature sensor


3


is located downstream of the blower


60


in the hose


70


which connects the blower


60


with the burner section


22


of the combustion system


20


. The location of the third temperature sensor


3


downstream of the blower


60


causes some complexities in calculating the flue gas recirculation percentage due to the heat that the blower


60


adds to the mixed air and flue gas. Placing the third temperature sensor


3


upstream of the blower would have avoided this complexity, but the air would not be mixed well enough at this location to allow the precise measurements that are required for these calculations.




The typical equation that is used in calculating the flue gas recirculation percentage (FGR) is the following, where subscripts


1


,


2


, and


3


refer to locations of the temperature sensors one, two, and three as shown in the figures:






FGR
=



[

Rate
2

]


[


Rate
1

+

Rate
2


]


=


[

Rate
2

]


[

Rate
3

]













From energy balance, assuming equal specific heat in each flow stream,






(Rate


1


*Temp


1


)+(Rate


2


*Temp


2


)=(Rate


3


*Temp


3


)






Combining and simplifying gives,






FGR
=


[


Temp
3

-

Temp
1


]


[


Temp
2

-

Temp
1


]












An analogous equation, based on oxygen concentrations, can be used to monitor the process with oxygen sensors. However, these equations do not account for the heat added to the system due to mechanical inefficiencies of the blower


60


. In contrast to conventional systems, the present invention utilizes the following equation in order to account for such additional heat







FGR
=


[


1.015
*

T
3



-

T
1


]


[


1.087
*

T
2


-

1.015


T
3




]



,










where T


3


′ is the difference between the temperature at the third temperature sensor


3


and the temperature change of the blower


60


.




The above equation is derived as follows:




From Conservation of Energy:






M


1


Cp


1


T


1


+M


2


Cp


2


T


2


=M


3


Cp


3


(T


3


−ΔT


Blower


)






but:






M


3


=M


1


+M


2








and:







Δ






T
Blower


=



U
Blower



M
3



Cp
3



.











Expanding the previous equation:







Δ






T
Blower


=


42.42


(

1
-

η
Blower


)



HP
Blower




(

1
+
FGR

)



Cp
3



Q
gas



γ
gas



ρ
air


AFR












But, knowing the affinity power relationships:







HP
1

=


HP
2








T
2


T
1





(


N
1


N
2


)

3












and calculating that:











Cp
3



1.015


Cp
1



=

0.2422






BTU


lb
m

-












Cp
2



1.087


Cp
1



=

0.2586






BTU


lb
m

-

















and by assuming a 15% FGR, 1.5% O


2


, 0.6 gas S.G., 60% η


Blower


(thermal efficiency of blower), 19 AFR, and 0.076303 lb/ft


3


air density (STP=60° F.); and having measured a motor load of 83.51 HP at 2,070 RPM and 102° F., then:







Δ






T
Blower


=




4
,
887
,




074
,
500



(

N

2


,
070



)

3





(


T
3

+
460

)



Q
gas



.











Let:






T


3


′=T


3


−ΔT


Blower








Then combining terms we find that the ratio of flue gas to air (FGR) is:








M
2


M
1


=



1.015


T
3



-

T
1




1.087


T
2


-

1.015


T
3















Where M is the Mass flow rate,




HP is in horsepower,




N is in RPM,




T is in ° F.,




Cp is the specific heat in BTU/lbm-F°,




Q


gas


(natural gas burned) is in Standard Cubic Feet per day,




FGR is the flue gas recirculation ratio, M


2


/M


1


, and




AFR is air to fuel ratio.




To more clearly describe the system, the following example is given. It is to be understood that the details and calculations shown below are simplified to describe the primary factors involved in calculating the flue gas recirculation percentage of a combustion system


20


as described. As would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, other secondary factors may affect the flue gas recirculation percentage. This example should not represent any limitation on the present invention. Corresponding reference numerals will be used where appropriate.




The above-described system


10


has been implemented and tested. The system


10


shown in

FIG. 3

, depicts a flue gas recirculation system


10


coupled to a combustion generator


20


. The system depicted in

FIG. 3

is different from the embodiment in

FIG. 1

in that the recirculation line is oriented differently and there is no flow restriction device depicted. It should be understood that the present invention does not require any particular orientation for recirculation line


40


, nor does it require a flow restriction device in the recirculation line. The system functions along the same principles and is included herein as one example of a specific configuration of the system of the present invention. In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

, the flue gas recirculation system


10


includes an air inlet line


50


that is four feet long and eighteen inches in diameter. The stack


30


is sized large enough such that pressure losses are negligible. Since the diameter of the exhaust stack


30


is sized so large, the pressure loss at the stack outlet


34


will not effect the pressure drop at the take off point


36


and the combination point


56


. The recirculation line


40


is sixty feet long and ten inches in diameter. In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

, the ratio of the diameter of the air inlet line (18 inches) to the diameter of the recirculation line (10 inches) is about 1.8:1. Of course, other ratios may be employed depending upon circumstances and desired results. Temperature data from an installation with this geometry was used to track the recirculation percentage of an operating generator, the results of which are shown in FIG.


4


. The flue gas recirculation percentage fluctuated between 16% and 22%. The standard deviation of this data is 2 percentage points.




NO


x


emissions at the generator depicted in

FIG. 3

, as measured with a separate analyzer, have been kept well below the allowable value of 30 ppm. Tests on other generators demonstrate that the recirculation percentage can be as low as 10%, and still achieve the desired NO


x


control of less than 30 ppm.

FIG. 5

depicts a graph of steam generator performance using the system of the present invention. Particularly, a graph of oxides of nitrogen (ppm) as a function of Flue Gas Recirculation rate (% FGR) is shown. As is apparent, the system of the present invention consistently achieves NO


x


values well below 30 ppm over a considerable range of % FGR (13-18%). As demonstrated by

FIG. 5

, the system of the present invention can achieve NO


x


values below 10 ppm. The system uses to obtain the data shown in both

FIGS. 4 and 5

did not contain a pressure drop device


80


in recirculation line


40


, thereby demonstrating the effectiveness of the system of the present invention, an the efficiency of the steady state configuration.




As described above, and as shown in the above example, the present invention provides a simple system for flue gas recirculation. It should be apparent that the present invention may be used to increase efficiency, to lower equipment costs and operating costs, and to simplify the calculation of flue gas recirculation percentage while achieving more accurate results.




CONCLUSION




While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.



Claims
  • 1. A passive flue gas recirculation system, for use with a combustion generator, for providing a selected percentage of flue gas recirculation, comprising:an exhaust stack for exhausting flue gas from the combustion generator, said exhaust stack having a stack inlet coupled to the combustion generator and a take off point; a recirculation line having a recirculation inlet and a recirculation outlet, wherein said recirculation inlet is coupled to said take off point; and an air inlet line for providing air to the combustion generator, wherein said recirculation outlet is coupled to said air inlet line at a combination point, said air inlet line is sized relative to said recirculation line such that the air inlet pressure drop plus the exhaust stack pressure drop equals the recirculation line pressure drop, thereby passively maintaining the selected percentage of flue gas recirculation to achieve a corresponding reduction in NOx emission.
  • 2. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 1, further comprising a flow restriction device disposed in said recirculation line.
  • 3. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 2, wherein said flow restriction device is an orifice plate.
  • 4. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 2, wherein said flow restriction device is a valve.
  • 5. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 1, wherein said system further comprises:a line having an inlet and an outlet, wherein said line outlet is coupled to the combustion generator; and a blower coupled to said air inlet line and to said line inlet.
  • 6. A gas recirculation system as in claim 5, wherein said blower is a variable speed drive blower.
  • 7. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 1, wherein the pressure at said combination point is lower than the pressure at said take off point.
  • 8. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 1, further comprising:a first temperature sensor disposed in said air inlet line; and a second temperature sensor disposed in said recirculation line.
  • 9. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 8, wherein said first temperature sensor is disposed upstream of said combination point.
  • 10. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 5, further comprising:a first temperature sensor disposed in said air inlet line; a second temperature sensor disposed in said recirculation line; and a third temperature sensor disposed in said line.
  • 11. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 10, wherein said first temperature sensor is disposed upstream of said combination point and said third temperature sensor is disposed downstream of said blower.
  • 12. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 1, wherein a diameter of said air inlet line is sized relative to a diameter of said recirculation line in a ratio of about 1.8:1.
  • 13. A passive flue gas recirculation system, for use with a combustion generator, for providing and maintaining a selected percentage of flue gas recirculation, comprising:an exhaust stack for exhausting flue gas from the combustion generator, said exhaust stack having a stack inlet coupled to the combustion generator and a take off point; a recirculation line having a recirculation inlet and a recirculation outlet, wherein said recirculation inlet is coupled to said take off point; an air inlet line for providing air to the combustion generator, wherein said recirculation outlet is coupled to said air inlet line at a combination point, said air inlet line is sized relative to said recirculation line such that the air inlet pressure drop plus the exhaust stack pressure drop equals the recirculation line pressure drop, thereby passively maintaining the selected percentage of flue gas recirculation to achieve a corresponding reduction in NOx emission; a first temperature sensor disposed in said air inlet line; and a second temperature sensor disposed in said recirculation line.
  • 14. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 13, wherein said first temperature sensor is disposed upstream of the combination point.
  • 15. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 13, wherein the combustion generator comprises a blower and a burner section, said system further comprising:a third temperature sensor disposed in a line coupled between the blower and the burner section of the combustion generator.
  • 16. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 15, wherein said first temperature sensor is disposed upstream of the combination point and said third temperature sensor is disposed downstream of the blower.
  • 17. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 15, wherein said first temperature sensor is located upstream of said third temperature sensor.
  • 18. A flue gas recirculation system as in claim 15, wherein said air inlet line is sized relative to said recirculation line such that the flue gas recirculation percentage (FGR) is passively maintained at a value of FGR=(1.015*T3′-T1)(1.087*T2-1.015*T3′);wherein T1 is the temperature measured at said first temperature sensor, T2 is the temperature measured at said second temperature sensor, T3 is the temperature measured at said third temperature sensor, and T3′ is a temperature factor equal to the temperature of the blower subtracted from T3.
Parent Case Info

The present application is a continuation of U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 09/137,706, filed Aug. 21, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,095,792.

US Referenced Citations (13)
Number Name Date Kind
4030874 Vollerin Jun 1977
4609342 Showalter Sep 1986
4659305 Nelson et al. Apr 1987
4926765 Dreizler et al. May 1990
5002484 Lofton et al. Mar 1991
5040470 Lofton et al. Aug 1991
5147200 Knopfel et al. Sep 1992
5347958 Gordon, Jr. Sep 1994
5415195 Stoy et al. May 1995
5511971 Benz et al. Apr 1996
5666944 Ferguson Sep 1997
5775317 Finke Jul 1998
6095792 Berger et al. Aug 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
3533272 Mar 1987 DE
3643797 Jun 1988 DE
0226534 Jun 1987 EP
0284011 Sep 1988 EP
0445413 Sep 1991 EP
0050033 Apr 1977 JP
53-30035 Mar 1978 JP
0025701 Sep 1978 JP
58-193009 Nov 1983 JP
59-27109 Feb 1984 JP
0188722 Sep 1985 JP
404028904 Jan 1992 JP
405180407 Jul 1993 JP
406193821 Jul 1994 JP
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/137706 Aug 1998 US
Child 09/526718 US