The present application relates to quick disconnect couplings, and more particularly to a quick disconnect coupling with a fluid circuit breaker.
Quick disconnect couplings permit fluid flow lines to quickly couple and de-couple. One type of conventional quick disconnect coupling incorporate a spring-loaded poppet valve on each connector half to stop the fluid from flowing when the two halves are separated. When the two connector halves are pushed together, spring-loaded poppet valves move against the bias force of a spring from the sealed position to an open flow position.
Spring-loaded poppet valves typically require a relatively large package envelope, yet the diameter of the fluid flow path through the valve is smaller than the overall diameter of the coupling. A relatively large pressure drop occurs between the valve halves for a given size and flow rate when compared to a similarly sized unobstructed flow path. This phenomenon occurs because the flow is required to pass between the poppet and the valve housing which may result in an area with high fluid velocity and high turbulence.
Although spring-loaded poppet valves have a relatively large pressure drop, this pressure drop will slow depressurization of the pressurized system to provide a user time to disconnect a severed hose and avoid rapid depressurization.
More current quick disconnect couplings allow the working fluid to flow at a design flow rate in either direction with an ultra-low pressure drop. Although effective, current quick disconnect couplings may require an inhibitor to minimize rapid depressurization.
A fluid circuit breaker according to an exemplary aspect of the present invention includes a plurality of petals and a bias system attached to the plurality of petals to maintain the plurality of petals at a closed un-obstructed flow condition below a predetermined flow velocity.
A quick disconnect coupling according to an exemplary aspect of the present invention includes: a support structure mounted to a conduit. A plurality of petals movable between an open obstructed flow condition and a closed un-obstructed flow condition relative to the support structure. A bias system attached to the plurality of petals to maintain the plurality of petals at the closed unobstructed flow condition below a predetermined flow velocity.
A method of minimizing rapid depressurization of a pressurized system according to an exemplary aspect of the present invention includes opening a plurality of petals against a bias system in response to a fluid flow above a predetermined flow velocity.
Various features will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the disclosed non-limiting embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
Referring to
Referring to
Each of the plurality of petals 22 are of an arcuate aerodynamic shape (
The bias system 24, in one non-limiting embodiment, includes a plurality of springs 36 attached to a spring base 38. The spring base 38 is attached to the support structure 26 though a fastener 40. The bias system 24 permits the plurality of petals 22 to move between a closed un-obstructed flow condition (
The plurality of petals 22 are generally divided into an inboard set 22A and an outboard set 22B. Each petal of the outboard set 22B include the spring attachment 34 and each petal of the inboard set 22A includes cut-outs 42 adjacent the upstream end section to receive the spring attachment 34 of the outboard set when in the closed un-obstructed flow condition (
In operation, the fluid flow readily passes over the plurality of petals 22 when the fluid circuit breaker 20 is in the closed un-obstructed flow condition (
In the event of, for example, a severed hose, the fluid flow increases the aerodynamic lift and the stagnation pressure on the plurality of petals 22. The fluid circuit breaker 20 generally relies upon aerodynamic lift over the plurality of petals 22 as a forcing function to overcome the bias system 24. In one example, a severed hose condition may be 4.3 psia, 70 deg F., oxygen gas, gas venting to 0 psia in which the pressure drop across the plurality of petals 22 produces an opening force of 0.384 lbf as compared to the bias system 24 which produces a force of 0.069 lbf. With this force imbalance in favor of the fluid flow operation on the plurality of petals 22, the fluid circuit breaker 20 actuates into the low-flow condition (
Once the connector valve is closed on the severed hose, the bias system 24 returns the fluid circuit breaker 20 to the ultra-low pressure drop configuration (
It should be understood that relative positional terms such as “forward,” “aft,” “upper,” “lower,” “above,” “below,” and the like are with reference to the normal operational attitude of the vehicle and should not be considered otherwise limiting.
It should be understood that like reference numerals identify corresponding or similar elements throughout the several drawings. It should also be understood that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom.
Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present invention.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Various non-limiting embodiments are disclosed herein, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that various modifications and variations in light of the above teachings will fall within the scope of the appended claims. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described. For that reason the appended claims should be studied to determine true scope and content.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
996127 | Patnaude | Jun 1911 | A |
1703311 | Litle, Jr. | Feb 1929 | A |
2518299 | Fernandez | Aug 1950 | A |
2894377 | Shikles, Jr. | Jul 1959 | A |
3042926 | Shepard | Jul 1962 | A |
3720208 | Aldrich et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3842614 | Karcher et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3895646 | Howat | Jul 1975 | A |
3905390 | Pysh | Sep 1975 | A |
3958605 | Nishizu et al. | May 1976 | A |
4067540 | Slade | Jan 1978 | A |
4069686 | Hoelman | Jan 1978 | A |
4222408 | Slaughter, Jr. | Sep 1980 | A |
4456029 | McCrum | Jun 1984 | A |
4459822 | Pasternack | Jul 1984 | A |
4633900 | Suzuki | Jan 1987 | A |
5185899 | Urbani | Feb 1993 | A |
5261482 | Lomax et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5340291 | Benckert et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5392844 | Lomax et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5592966 | Gates | Jan 1997 | A |
6349412 | Dean | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6435009 | Tilley | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6848297 | Tilley | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7114519 | Aitchison et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140234 | Tilley | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7252644 | Dewald et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262385 | Fuson | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7343783 | Tilley | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20050016594 | Moesby et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20080035222 | Fraser | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100024894 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |