Fluid controlled adjustable down-hole tool

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6708785
  • Patent Number
    6,708,785
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 21, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 23, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
An adjustable down-hole tool, for example a drill-string stabiliser (10), comprises a body (12) having a through bore (16). A mandrel (18) is rotationally fixed but axially movable in the body, the mandrel being movable by fluid pressure in the tool against the action of a first return spring (44) between a first, activated position and a second deactivated position. A sleeve (66) is between shoulders (68, 69) on the body and mandrel. Castellations (18a,b, 69a,b) are on the mandrel and facing edge or edges of the sleeve so that, when the castellations are in phase the mandrel is prevented from travelling from said first to second position and when they are out of phase they interdigitate and the mandrel is not prevented from travelling from said first to second position. A control piston (36) is slidable in the mandrel, being movable by fluid pressure in the tool against the action of a second return spring (50). The piston is axially slidable with respect to said sleeve and rotationally fixed with respect thereto. A circumferential barrel cam (56) is defined on the piston, a cam follower (58) being disposed in the mandrel but within the confines of the barrel cam so that axial movement of the piston with respect to the mandrel results in corresponding rotation of the piston with respect to the mandrel.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates to adjustable down-hole tools employed in the oil and gas drilling industry.




2. Description of the Related Art




Drill string stabilisers, under reamers and fishing tools are some of the down hole tools that require activation when they are in a given position down hole to make them operative, and deactivation when they are to be withdrawn, or repositioned or indeed simply to go into a different operating condition.




Taking stabilisers as an example, these tools centralise drill strings with respect to the hole drilled. They normally comprise a sub assembly in the drill string. The stabiliser has a plurality of blades, (usually three and usually spirally arranged), whose edges are adapted to bear against the bore-hole. The blades are not complete around a circumference of the drill string so that the return route for drilling mud pumped down the bore of the drill string is not blocked. In order to control the direction of drill bits, it is sometimes required that the stabiliser has variable diameter. Pistons in the blades are extendable to give the stabiliser a maximum diameter, which ensures that the drill string is central in the bore-hole. The drill bit, assuming the stabiliser is close behind the drill bit, is thus kept straight. However, if the pistons are withdrawn, then gravity can deflect the drill string so that it alters the inclination of the hole.




EP-A-0251543 describes a slabiliser that is activated by weight on the stabiliser from the drill string above it. Weight, or absence thereof, switches the stabiliser between activated and de-activated positions. The weight acts on a mandrel slidable in the bore of the stabiliser, which mandrel has ramps against which wedge-surfaces on the bases of the pistons slide. A mechanical detent is overcome by a compressive force on the stabiliser greater than a threshold value, so that unless substantial changes in weight act on the stabiliser, switching does not occur. This means that some variation in weight is permissable without changing the activation of the stabiliser. However, it is known that excessive changes in weight can occur unintentionally, possibly resulting in accidental activation and deactivation of the stabiliser.




It has been suggested to employ a rise in mud pump pressure to move the mandrel in the stabiliser. Changes in pressure switch the mandrel between different positions. Such a system is described in EP-A-0190529, in which a differential piston cooperates with a flow restrictor so that, if the fluid pressure rises beyond a low threshold, the piston (or flow restrictor) moves to rapidly and substantially increase the pressure differential across the piston which then drives the mandrel to activate the stabiliser. As a subsidiary feature the mandrel rotates on each stroke because the pads have pins which follow a barrel cam defined around the mandrel, which barrel cam has different steepness ramps so that the pads are extended different amounts. Unintentional variations in fluid pressure might also cause premature activation or deactivation.




GB-A-2263923 discloses a stabiliser control arrangement in which the object is to not be dependent on either fluid pressure or weight on the bit to maintain a stabiliser setting. This is achieved by lifting the drill string to positively disengage the locking mechanism, and then fluid pressure is employed to determine the stabiliser piston position. At the appropriate pressure the drill string is lowered to engage a lock, whereupon subsequent changes in fluid pressure have no effect on stabiliser position.




GB-A-2251444 has essentially the same aims as GB-A-2263923, except that, here, check valves prevent operation or deactivation of the stabiliser pads unless the pressure of the pump fluid exceeds or falls below upper and lower threshold values.




EP-A-0661412 has an arrangement similar to EP-A-190529. The position of a control piston determines the pressure drop across the mandrel which therefore controls the position of the mandrel. The control piston has a barrel cam in which a pin of the housing slides, so that the piston is constrained to follow a course determined by the track. A junction in the track is provided so that, at an intermediate pressure, if the pressure is reversed the pin does not return to its stating point but goes up a branch to a lesser (or greater) extent than its starting point. The stabiliser is activated between upper and lower pressures and that the pressure be taken from one level to an intermediate level whereupon the direction of pressure change is reversed.




GB-A-2314868 describes an arrangement in which the mandrel is hydraulically operated between operative and inoperative positions A first shoulder on the body of the stabiliser in which the mandrel slides has a serrated face. A facing shoulder on the body has a clutch face which is also set Between the two faces is a sleeve which is axially fixed but rotationally freely slidable on the mandrel. On the edge of the sleeve facing the serrated edge of the body is series of knobs to engage the serrations and rotate the sleeve through a small angle when the sleeve is axially pressed against the serrations. On its other edge, it has a series of fingers to engage the clutch face and either catch on ridges of the clutch face, which are provided with stops to prevent further rotation of the sleeve, or they miss the stops and hit a sloping serration of the lower shoulder causing further rotation of the sleeve until its fingers coincide with long slots in the shoulder whereupon the sleeve permits the mandrel to go to its operative position.




Consequently, as pressure is alternated and the mandrel moves back and forth, when it first moves down, for example, it may rest on the ridges of the clutch face and prevent the mandrel from going to its operative position When the pressure is released and the mandrel rises the knohs on the sleeve hit the serrations and turn the sleeve through a small angle; enough so that on the next stroke of the mandrel the fingers on the sleeve do not stay on the ridges. Instead, the fingers slide down the serrations of the clutch face and drop into slots therein. This movement takes the mandrel into its operative position. Finally on the return stroke, when the knobs again contact the serrated face the sleeve again rotates, repeating the cycle.




A problem with this arrangement, and with EP-A-0661412 is that the pressure which activates the stabiliser must be greater, of course, than the return force provided by springs, for example, which springs must themselves be very substantial in order to guarantee deactivation and overcome any jamming tendency which could occur through external pressure on the pistons. Consequently, there is wear on the components which are rotating, or causing the rotation, since they are simultaneously subject to substantial axial loads. Moreover, in the case of GB-A-2314868, because the fingers are the same components which result in rotation of the sleeve, they cannot be as substantial as their loading, particularly in an extended position, would ideally want them to be. Thus they may break.




GB-A-2314868 also discloses application of the mechanism described therein in relation to under reamers.




It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a down-hole tool activation arrangement which does not suffer firm, or at least mitigates these or other problems.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the present invention, there is therefore provided an adjustable down-hole tool comprising




a body having a through bore;




a mandrel axially movable in the body, the mandrel being movable by fluid pressure in the tool against the action of a first return spring between a first, activated position and a second deactivated position;




a sleeve between a shoulder on the body and the mandrel;




at least two sets of castellations, one on one of said shoulder and said mandrel and the other on a facing edge of the sleeve so that, when the castellations are in phase the mandrel is prevented from travelling foam said first to second position and when they are out of phase they interdigitate and the mandrel is not prevented from travelling from said first to second position; and




means to rotate the sleeve relative to the mandrel between said in-phase and out-of-phase positions;




characterised in that




said means comprises a control piston slidable in the mandrel, being movable by fluid pressure in the tool against the action of a second return spring; and in that




one of said piston and mandrel is rotationally fixed with respect to the body.




Preferably, it is said mandrel which is rotationally fixed with respect to the body. Preferably, said control piston is axially slidable with respect to said sleeve and rotationally fixed with respect hereto Preferably, a circumferential barrel cam is defined in one of sad piston and mandrel, a cam follower being disposed in the other thereof, the follower being within the barrel cam so that axial movement of the piston with respect to the mandrel results in corresponding rotation of the piston with respect to the mandrel. In this case, the barrel cam may be shaped so that movement of the piston in one axial stroke and return thereof results in rotation of the sleeve from a said in-phase position to a said out-of-phase position or vice versa. Said castellations are preferably angularly spaced by a phase angle and said stroke and return of the piston results in rotation of the sleeve by said phase angle.




When said mandrel is in said deactivated position, a rise in hydraulic pressure in the tool preferably results in movement of the piston before movement of the mandrel. Said first return spring may be sufficiently stronger than said second return spring to ensure that, when said mandrel is in said deactivated position, a rise in hydraulic pressure in the tool results in movement of the piston before movement of the mandrel. Alternatively, or in addition, a spring loaded detent may be provided between said mandrel and body to retain the mandrel in said deactivated position until a threshold hydraulic pressure has been exceeded, which pressure is greater than that required to move said piston. Said detent may comprise a plunger in a radial bore of the mandrel or body, spring biassed against a lip of the body or mandrel, respectively. Said lip may be of a circumferential groove around the body.




Preferably, the plunger has a through bore connecting the space between the mandrel and body with a space behind the plunger so that hydraulic effects are substantially eliminated. Moreover, there are preferably a plurality of said detents arranged around the circumference of the mandrel. This reduces any moment on the mandrel relative to the body.




The mandrel will usually have a through bore and be scaled to the body abut first and second circumferences, the first being a larger circumference upstream, in terms of fluid flow through the tool, of the second, smaller circumference. Thus hydraulic forces act on the mandrel relative to the body urging the mandrel in a downstream direction.




The piston preferably also has a through bore and is sealed to the mandrel about third and fourth circumferences, the third being a larger circumference upstream, in terms of fluid flow through the tool, of the fourth, smaller circumference. Thus hydraulic forces likewise act on the piston relative to the mandrel also urging the piston in a downstream direction.




Preferably, the piston extends from the mandrel and is sealed to the body. Indeed, the seal between the body and mandrel about said second circumference, and the seal between the piston and mandrel about said fourth circumference, may comprise an integrated seal between the piston and the body.




In said activated position, the bore of the piston preferably engages a plug in the bore of the body to create a flow restriction and consequent back pressure detectable to indicate the position of the tool.




Said tool can be a drill-string stabiliser, in which case said mandrel has wedge surfaces to engage corresponding surfaces on radially disposed pistons slidable in the body, whereby, when the mandrel moves from said deactivated to said activated position, the pistons extend from the body inn sing the working diameter of the stabiliser.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS




The invention is further described hereinafter, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIGS. 1



a, b


and


c


are side sections through the tool in accordance with the present invention, in different positions thereof;





FIG. 2

is a section on the line II—II in

FIG. 1



c;







FIGS. 3



a, b, c


and d are, respectively, a side view of a control piston of the tool of

FIG. 1

, a section on the line X—X in

FIG. 3



a


, a section on the line Y—Y in

FIG. 3



a


and a detailed view of the barrel cam in the direction of arrow A in

FIG. 3



a;







FIGS. 4



a


and


b


are, respectively, an expanded side view of detail B in

FIG. 1



a


, and


a


side section on the line IV—IV in

FIG. 1



a;







FIGS. 5



a


and


b


are, respectively, a view in the direction of arrow A in

FIG. 5



b


, and an expanded view of detail V in

FIG. 1



a;







FIG. 6

is a view similar to

FIG. 5



a


, but of an alternative embodiment of the preset invention;





FIGS. 7



a


to


d


are enlargements of one end of the stabiliser according to the embodiment of the present invention shown in

FIG. 6

, and wherein development of a signalling constriction is shown;





FIGS. 8



a


and


b


are graphs showing changes in mud pump pressures with mandrel position and time, respectively;





FIGS. 9



a, b


and


c


are side sections through an alternative embodiment of a tool in accordance with the present invention; and





FIG. 10

is a detailed view of the inset marked X on

FIG. 9



a.













DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




In the drawings, a stabiliser


10


comprises a body


12


connectable to a drill string (not shown) by means of male and female connectors


14


at either end thereof. A bore


16


extends from one end of the body


12


to the other, to permit flow of mud to lubricate the drill bit (not shown) at the end of the string. Slidable in the bore


16


is a mandrel


18


which is rotationally fixed therein by virtue of a stud


20


in the body


12


which extends into a slot


22


in the mandrel


18


. The slot


22


extends axially of the mandrel


18


permitting axial movement thereof within the body


12


.




Spiral blades


24


are defied on the surface of the body


12


and bear against the surface of the bore hole (not shown) being drilled to guide the drill bit. The blades permit the return passage of drilling mud by being spaced around the body


12


. The blades


24


have radial bores


26


defined in spaced relation along each blade


24


. Within each bore


26


is a piston


28


urged radially inwards by springs (not shown). The base of each piston is formed with a wedge surface


30


against which a wedge


31


of the mandrel


18


acts. Thus, if the mandrel moves rightwardly in the drawings, the pistons


28


are thrust radially outwardly projecting beyond the circumference of the stabiliser


10


defined by the blades


24


, (see

FIG. 1



c


). In this way, the working diameter of the stabiliser increases with the faces of the pistons


28


bearing against the wall of the bore hole.




A collar


25


is screwed onto the mandrel


18


at its upstream end


32


(see also FIG.


4


). Above the collar


25


is a seal sleeve


34


which is sealed both to the mandrel


18


and the bore


16


of the body


12


. At its downstream end


33


, the mandrel receives a control piston


36


. The control piston is slidable in a bore


38


of the mandrel which extends from its upstream end


32


to its downstream end


33


. The control piston carries seals


46


which seal the piston with respect to the mandrel


18


. The piston


36


extends out of the end


33


of the mandrel


18


and is itself sealed at


48


to the bore


16


of the body


12


.




As far as the body


12


is concerned, the mandrel and piston are a single unit, and it can be seen that the circumference of the sleeve seal


34


in the body


12


is much larger than the circumference of the seal


48


around the piston


36


. Consequently, hydraulic pressure of the mud in the tool


10


results in a larger downward force acting at the end


32


of the mandrel


18


via the seal sleeve


34


, than acting in the reverse direction on the piston


36


through its seals


48


.




Springs


44


act between a shoulder


42


in the body


12


(via compensation device


23


described further below) and the collar


25


on the mandrel


18


, urging the mandrel in the upstream direction. Should the pressure differential be such that the force acting on the mandrel exceeds the return force of the sprung


44


, the mandrel will move rightwardly in the drawing.




Likewise, hydraulic pressure acting on the control piston


36


across the circumference of its seals


46


to the mandrel result in a downward force on the piston


36


because the circumference of the seal


48


to the body


12


is smaller than seal circumference


46


. Again, springs


50


act between shoulder


52


in the mandrel


18


and shoulder


54


on the piston


36


to urge the piston in an upstream direction. Again, should the hydraulic pressure be such that the force of the springs


50


are overcome, the piston


36


will move rightwardly in the drawings.




The piston has a barrel cam


56


defined in its surface (see

FIG. 3



a


). Pins


58


in the mandrel are received within the confines of the barrel cam


56


so that movement of one relative to the other forces the piston to follow a course defined by the barrel cam


56


. If the mandrel is considered, for the moment, to be stationary, then, as hydraulic pressure increases in the bore


38


of the mandrel


18


, the piston


36


begins movement from left to right (with reference to

FIG. 1



a


). Suppose the pins


58


start at position


58




a


, for example (see

FIG. 3



d


), where they lie at the base of a first notch


56




a


of the barrel cam. They will thus move, relatively to the barrel cam


56


, until they contact the opposite wall thereof at


56




b


. Further axial movement of the piston


36


then only occurs when the piston rotates through a small angle α


1


, so that the pin


58


effectively moves to position


58




b


in notch


56




c


on the opposite side of the barrel cam


56


from notch


56




a.






Should the hydraulic pressure be released, ream springs


50


force the piston


36


leftwardly in the drawings (

FIG. 1



a-c


). The pin


58


is obliged to follow a course from position


58




b


in notch


56




c


of the barrel cam


56


, axially until the opposite wall of the barrel cam


56




d


is contacted. Thereafter, further axial movement of the piston can only occur on further rotation of the piston In this event, the pin moves to the base of notch


56




e


on the same side of the barrel cam


56


as notch


56




a


. In this movement, the piston has rotated through a further angle α


2


, which is not necessarily the same as α


1


. Nevertheless the sum (α


1





2


) is equal to α, the angle of rotation of the piston


36


on one complete return stroke thereof in relation to the mandrel


18


.




A subsidiary feature of the barrel cam


56


and pins


58


is that the pins


58


have a large diameter section


58


′ and a small diameter end


58


″. The barrel cam has a correspondingly wide slot


56


′ and a deeper, narrow slot


56


″, so that the wide slot


56


′ accommodates the large diameter section


58


′ of the pin


58


, while the narrow slot


56


″ accommodates the thin pin end


58


″. The purpose of this is that a wide slot is inevitably somewhat coarse compared with a narrow slot, which can be precise. On the other hand, a wide slot with a large diameter pin significantly reduces point loads, both on the pin and cam surface it is following. Given that the control piston is spring loaded, it inevitably resists rotation due to frictional forces, although these can be alleviated, for example, by employing a thrust bearing between the spring


50


and piston


36


. However, even with this measure, if only a coarse cam surface


56


′ land large pin


58


′ is employed, then, in moving from notch


56




a


to contact surface


56




b


, a rotational drift back in the direction of Arrow X in

FIG. 3



d


of only 1° can be permitted. Any greater drift, which would generally be caused by the sprig having been “wound up” by previous movements, would cause contact of the pin


58


′ with point


56




f


of the cam


56


′, such that secure guidance of the pin to notch


56




c


could not be guaranteed. Because slot


56


″ can be more precise, however, the permitted angle of drift can be much greater, such as


15


° (see Arrow Y in

FIG. 3



d


), while still ensuring that the pin is guided correctly and rotation of the piston


36


in the correct direction is guaranteed. At the same time, however, it is only during these extreme situations that loading only occurs through the narrow slot


56


″ and thin pin end


58


″. Most of the time, and indeed mostly all the time when thrust bearing are employed, both surfaces


56


′ and


56


″ are contacted by both pin parts


58


′ and


58


″, so that wear on the pin


58


and slot


56


is minimised, even though accurate guidance is ensured.




As shown in

FIG. 3



a


and


c


, the piston


36


has a longitudinal slot


60


in which is received a key


64


of a castellated sleeve


66


(see

FIGS. 5



a


and


b


for more details).




The sleeve


66


is received between a shoulder


68


of the body


12


and end


33


of the mandrel


18


. The end


33


of the mandrel


18


is castellated having fingers


18




a


and slots


18




b


. The end


69


of the sleeve


68


is likewise castellated having fingers


69




a


and slots


69




b


. When the fingers


18




a


,


69




a


of the mandrel and sleeve are in phase with one another, as shown in

FIG. 5



a


, then rightward movement of the mandrel


18


in the drawings, is limited, with the fingers


18




a


,


69




a


abutting one another and the other end


70


of the sleeve


66


abutting shoulder


68


of the body


12


.




On the other hand, however, when the sleeve


66


is out of phase with respect to the mandrel


18


, fingers


18




a


face slots


69




b


and fingers


69




a


face slots


18




b


so that, when the mandrel


18


moves rightwardly in the drawings, the castellations on the mandrel and sleeve interdigitate so that further rightward movement of the mandrel


18


is possible than when the castellations are in phase. The angular separation of the fingers and slots in the mandrel and sleeve is arranged to be the same angle a (or multiples thereof), as described above.




Consequently, when the piston makes a complete return stroke serving to rotate the sleeve


66


through the angle 2α, the sleeve


66


moves from an in-phase position to an out-of-phase position, or vice versa.




Although

FIGS. 5



a


and


b


show fingers


18




a


,


69




a


and slots


18




b


,


69




b


extending across the thickness of both the mandrel


18


and sleeve


66


respectively, in

FIG. 2

, it can be seen that the respective fingers and slots extend only across a portion of the thickness of each element


18


,


66


. Both arrangements are functionally identical, the arrangement in

FIG. 2

merely being mechanically more sound.




Turning now to

FIG. 6

, an alternative arrangement is shown to that described above with reference to

FIG. 5



a


. Here, the sleeve


66


′ has alternate slots


69




b


′ which have different depths (shallow,


69




b


′, and deep,


69




b





2


). Similarly, the mandrel


18


′ has alternate fingers


18




a


′ which are correspondingly short,


18




a


′, and long


18




a





2


. Such an arrangement necessitates, of course, an even number of fingers and slots around the sleeve


66


′ and mandrel


18


′, which has a consequent effect ion the barrel cam


56


. In the previous embodiment, there were five fingers/slots around the periphery (as shown in FIG.


2


), meaning that angle 2α was 72° of rotation Here, there are preferably six fingers/slots, so that angle 2α is 60°.




The result of varying depth of fingers


18




a


′ and slots


69




b


′ is that mandrel


18


can have three positions instead of just two, that is to say an intermediate position between deactivation and full activation. In

FIG. 6

at its top, the mandrel is shown in its fully activated position


18


′A, in which long fingers


18




a





2


coincide with deep slots


69




b





2


, so that this corresponds entirely with at activated position of the previous embodiment, At the bottom of

FIG. 6

, the fingers


18




a





2


coincide with the fingers


69




a


of the sleeve


66


′ (which fingers are all level, as in the embodiment described with reference to

FIG. 5



a


), so that the mandrel is in its deactivated position


18


′C, again corresponding with the deactivated position of the previous embodiment and as shown in FIG.


5


. However, in the middle of

FIG. 6

, there is shown the intermediate position


18


′B in which long fingers


18




a





2


coincide with shallow slots


69




b





1


, with the result that the pistons


28


are only displaced radially outwardly to a lesser extent.




Returning to

FIG. 1



a


and with reference also to

FIG. 4



a


, and


b


, the mandrel has on the collar


25


a series of pockets


90


in which a plunger


92


is disposed. Springs


94


press the plunger radially outwards, the plungers being retained in the pockets


90


by threaded retainers


96


. The head


98


of each plunger


92


is received within a circumferential groove


100


in the body


12


. It is therefore apparent that rightward movement of the mandrel in the body


12


is only possible if the plungers


92


are first pressed radially inwardly. For this purpose groove


100


is provided with an angled cam surface


102


. Thus when the mandrel is piss sufficiently strongly in the rightward direction in the drawings, the returning force of the springs


94


may be overcome and the plungers (


92


) are pressed radially inwardly so that they pas over lip


104


of the groove


100


. In order to ensure that hydraulic effects do not influence the operation of this detent represented by the plungers


92


, each plunger has a through bore


106


connecting space


108


between the mandrel


18


and body


12


with space


110


behind the plunger


92


and within the pocket


90


.




While the detent plungers are shown spring loaded, the same result could be achieved with the plungers forming pistons as shown at


92


′. Fluid behind the pistons here resists their radially inward displacement until the fluid leaked out around the sides thereof. Nevertheless, a return spring


94


is still required, and moreover a return flow path


106


′ guarded by a check valve


95


is also required. The check valve comprises a ball


99


and spring


101


and it inhibits fluid leaving the space


97


behind the piston


92


′, but permits inflow when the springs


94


push the piston


92


′ out.




In operation of the stabiliser


10


, therefore, and beginning with the positions shown in

FIG. 1



a


, a user at ground level who wishes to increase the working diameter of the stabiliser


10


increases the flow and pressure of drilling mud down the bore of the drill string so that hydraulic pressure begins to sat on the components within the stabiliser tool. Because of the detent represented by the plungers


92


, he mandrel is at first prevented from moving. However, the piston


36


ha| no such detent and so commences to move rightwardly in

FIG. 1



a


against the pressure of spring


50


. Rightward movement of the piston


36


is thus accompanied by rotation thereof through the angle α


1


, which, for the sake of argument, rotates the sleeve


66


, via the key


64


sliding in the slot


62


of the piston


36


, to the position shown in

FIG. 5



a


where the fingers


69




a


of the sleeve


66


are in phase with the fingers


18




a


of the mandrel


18


. It must be borne in mind that the mandrel


18


is rotationally fixed in the body


12


by pin


20


received in slot


22


. Thus, even if the pressure in the tool


10


should continue to rise sufficient to release the detent plungers


92


from the slot


100


, the mandrel


18


cannot move much further rightwardly than shown in

FIG. 1



a


by virtue of the fingers


18




a


at the end


33


of the mandrel contacting the fingers


69




a


of the sleeve


66


. Indeed, such movement as there is merely takes up the clearance between the fingers


18




a


,


69




a


, and between end


70


of the sleeve


66


and shoulder


68


.




However, should it be desired by the user that the stabiliser operate in its maximum working diameter, the operator reduces the pump press so that the spring


44


returns the mandrel (to the extent that this is necessary) to the position shown in FIG.


1




a


. The springs


50


also return the piston from the position shown in

FIG. 1



b


to that shown in

FIG. 1



a


. In doing so, the piston woes through the further angle α


2


. On the next occasion, therefore, that the hydraulic pressure is increased again so that the piston


36


moves once again towards the position shown in

FIG. 1



b


, and it rotates through a further angle α


1


, then, on this occasion, the castellations on the mandrel


18


and sleeve


66


will be out of phase. Consequently, once the hydraulic pressure rises sufficiently to force the mandrel past the detent plungers


92


, the mandrel will move fully rightwards as shown in

FIG. 1



c


, with the respective castellations on the mandrel and sleeve inter-digitating.




In this position, as shown in

FIG. 1



c


, an end


37


of the piston


36


moves into close proximity with a plug


19


in the body


12


, with the result that a substantial constriction


110


is created in the fluid flow. The operator at ground level is then advised that the mandrel has moved to its activated position by a sudden rise in pump working pressure.




Here, as shown in

FIG. 1



c


, the pistons are pressed radially outwardly so that they stand proud of the surface of the blades


24


and increase the working diameter of the stabiliser


10


.




It will be apparent to the skilled reader that, m moving within the body


12


, the mandrel


18


and piston


36


compress the space between the body and mandrel/piston and defined by the seats


34


,


48


and primarily occupied by the space containing springs


44


and


50


and sleeve


66


. This space is filled with hydraulic oil and is isolated both from fluid pressure external of the stabiliser


12


, as well as hydraulic pressure internally of the bore


38


. Thus firstly there is a requirement to provide for relief of the oil in that space as the mandrel moves and compresses that space. Secondly, since the hydraulic pressures both internally and externally are intense, a means to match pressure in that space is desirable in order to avoid disruption of the seals.




For this purpose, pressure relief chamber


23


is provided This chamber is of known construction per se and consequently only brief description is required here. Chamber


23


comprises an annular bellows


23


′ which, internally, is in fluid communication with the space and springs


44


and


50


and sleeve


66


, and externally is in communication with the outside environment through port


27


. Thus the pressure in the space referred to must correspond with the outside pressure. The chamber


23


is itself sealed to the bore


16


of the body


12


, but not to the mandrel


18


. The movement of the mandrel and compression of the space around spring


44


is also, indeed primarily, taken up by radially outward movement of the pistons


28


.




Referring again to

FIG. 4



c


, on rightward movement of the mandrel


18


, the detent plungers


92


move into over lip


104


into a shallow, groove


112


in the body


12


, which has a much less steep return face


114


. Consequently springs


44


, once hydraulic pressure has been released, have no problem in compressing plungers


92


to return them over lip


104


.




By this arrangement, two connected effects are experience. The first is that the piston


36


moves with very little extraneous loading upon it. Thus the mandrel


18


is held in position by the detent plungers


92


so that sleeve


66


is freely rotatable between the end


33


of the mandrel


18


and the shoulder


68


on the body


12


by movement of the piston


36


. Consequently there is little wear on the barrel cam


56


or the pins


58


received therein. Secondly, because the fingers


18




a


,


69




a


have no function beyond meeting one another and resisting the heavy fortes imposed by the hydraulic pressure, or inter-digitating when out of phase, they can be substantial components with little need to provide mutually sliding surfaces, for example. Thus they are able to be made as structurally strong components less liable to fail, without adversely affecting operation of the stabiliser.




It is intended that the present invention operates (that is to say toggles between positions) at pressures well below normal operating pressures of the drill string, which may be in the region of 500 psi or more. At these pressures, the control piston is designed to remain in the position shown in

FIG. 1



b


or


1




c


relative to the mandrel, the latter being in either of its activated or deactivated positions (the fingers and slots on the mandrel and sleeve being entirely in-phase or entirely out-of-phase). On sing from zero pressure, both the mandrel and control piston would begin to move together but, due to the strength of the springs and their design the piston can be arranged to have completed its stroke before the mandrel has substantially begun to move. In any event, as mentioned above, the dent mechanism actively prevents the mandrel moving until the forces on it exceed a predefined limit. Indeed, that limit is arranged so that once the detent has been released, the mandrel moves from its stat position to its final position without further increase in pressure. In other words it is a clean switching action.




This is illustrated in

FIG. 8



a


which is a grape of mud pump pressure (P) versus position (M) of the end


37


of the piston


36


with respect to its position shown in

FIG. 1



a


. As pressure increases from some value x above zero (there will be a preset loading of the spring


50


) to P


1


, the control piston moves gradually from CP


1


to CP


2


, ie to the position shown in

FIG. 1



b


. Thereafter there is no movement until the pressure reaches P


2


, whereupon the detent mechanism is overcome and the mandrel moves from position M


1


to M


2


, being the position shown in

FIG. 1



c


without further change in pressure P. Of course, should the fingers


18




a


,


69




a


be in phase, then the mandrel will stay at M


1


and further increase in pressure will follow the phantom line in

FIG. 8



a


. If the stabiliser is as the alternative embodiment described with reference to

FIG. 6

, then the mandrel may move instead to position M


i


, being the intermediate position, and further increase in pressure will follow the dashed line in

FIG. 1



a


. In any event, all lines will reach working pressure WP, except that it will be less when the mandrel is in position M


1


than M


2


, because of the constriction


110


caused by plug


19


.




Turning to

FIGS. 7



a


to


7




d


, there is shown an arrangement of the piston


36


′ and plug


19


′ which assists in signalling to the user the position that the mandrel is in, and thus the state of activation of the stabiliser


10


, when the stabiliser is modified as described with reference to FIG.


6


.




In

FIG. 7



a


, the piston


36


′ is in position CP


1


, ie no pump pressure. In

FIG. 7



b


, it has moved to position CP


2


/M


1


, where constriction


110


is negligible and not yet having any significant effect. A graph of pressure P versus time T is shown in

FIG. 8



b


, where it can be seen that reaching position M


1


has no precise impact on the shape of the developing pressure. However, if the mandrel stays in the position M


1


, then the pressure continues to develop to working pressure WP


1


along the solid line in

FIG. 8



b.






If, on the other hand, the mandrel moves to the intermediate position M


i


, then the piston moves to the position shown in

FIG. 7



c


where an internal lip


39


, which is formed by a circumferential groove


41


formed in the bore of the piston


36


, passe over a lip


43


on the plug


19


′. Here, not only has the constriction


110


formed, but also, in moving to this position a very tight constriction was temporarily formed while the lips


39


,


43


overlapped. This results in a strong pressure pulse (at M


i


in

FIG. 8



b


) before the pressure continues rise to WP


2


, which is higher than WP


1


in view of the constriction


110


.




Finally, as the piston moves to the position shown in

FIG. 7



d


, where the mandrel is in its fully activated position M


2


, lip


43


moves over groove


41


and causes an even tighter constriction within the bore of the piston


36


′. This further increases the pressure at M


2


in

FIG. 8



b


, before the pressure continues to rise to WP


3


which is again higher than WP


2


.




Thus by this mechanism not only are the final working pressures different for the different working positions of the mandrel


18


, but also a pressure pulse is experienced at each change of position. Indeed, with sensitive detection equipment at the surface and connected to the drilling mud pressure line, it may even be possible to dispense with the constriction


110


per se, and simply rely on the pulses to detect position rather than final working pressures.




Finally,

FIGS. 9 and 10

illustrate a different embodiment of the present invention in which the control arrangement for movement of the mandrel is moved to the upstream end of the stabiliser. In these figures, parts with equivalent function to the embodiment described with reference to

FIG. 1

are given the same references numeral, except for the addition of an apostrophe (′) or double apostrophe (″) if the element in question differs in any way from previous embodiments.




In this embodiment, the mandrel


18


″ is a sliding fit inside the piston


36


″, which is itself a sliding fit in the bore of the body


12


′. Instead of the piston rotating, here a component


361


of the piston rotates on it through beans


362


,


364


. The component


361


is rotationally mounted through bearings


362


,


364


on the piston


36


″ and rotates relative thereto as the piston moves up and down the body


12


′. The cam track


56


″ is formed on the surface of the component


361


, whereas the cam follower pins


581


are mounted on sleeve


66


′, which is now effectively just a pat of the body


12


′. The sleeve


66


′ is prevented from rotating relative to the body by a bolt


64


′ or by similar means. A mandrel drive ring


366


is carried by the piston


36


″ and rides in an annular groove


182


in the mandrel


18


″. The ring


366


is in two part and is returned by collar


54


′ screwed onto the end of piston


36


″.




When mud pressure increases, the piston


36


″ moves rightwardly in the drawing and, depending on the rotational position of the Sleeve


66


′, fingers


69




a


″/


18




a


″ on the sleeve


66


′ and component


361


either oppose one another or interdigitate with each other falling into slots


18




b


″/


69




b


″. If they interdigitate, then drive ring


366


hits the end of slot


182


and the piston


36


″ drives the mandrel rightwardly in the drawing to set it in its full gauge, activated position. If, however, the fingers


69




a


″/


18




a


″ face one another then even if mandrel


18


″ slides rightwardly relative to piston bore


36


′ under the influence of mud pressure (which is minimised by substantial equality of diameter of the mandrel upstream, to the piston, (seal


46


′) on the one hand, and downstream, to the body, (seal


34


′) on the other hand), drive ring


366


prevents rightward movement of the mandrel


18


″ and the mandrel remains in its under gauge or deactivated position of the stabiliser.




It is to be noted that here, the cam track


56


″ and the component


361


move with the mandrel and therefore cam extensions


56





a


in an axial direction are needed, at least in positions where the fingers


69




a


″/


18




a


″ interdigitate and the axial movement of the piston


36


′ and component


361


is extensive relative to the sleeve


66


′.



Claims
  • 1. An adjustable down-hole tool comprisinga body having a through bore; a mandrel axially movable and rotationally fixed in the body, the mandrel being movable by fluid pressure in the tool between a first, activated position and a second deactivated position; a sleeve, said sleeve limiting movement of,aid mandrel between said positions; at least two sets of castellations, one set on the sleeve and the other set on an edge of the mandrel facing the castellations on the sleeve so that, when the castellation are in phase, the mandrel is prevented from travelling from said first to second position and when they are out of phase they interdigitate and the mandrel is not prevented from travelling from said first to second position; and means to rotate the sleeve relative to the facing edge between said in-phase and out-of-phase positions; wherein said means comprises a control piston slidable in or on the mandrel and in the body and being movable by fluid pressure in the tool against the action of a first return spring and in which said piston is axially slidable with respect to said sleeve and rotationally fixed with respect thereto.
  • 2. A tool as claimed in claim 1, in which said tool is a drill-string stabiliser and said mandrel has wedge surfaces to engage corresponding surfaces on radially disposed pistons slidable in the body, whereby, when the mandrel moves from said deactivated to said activated position, the pistons extend from the body increasing the working diameter of the stabiliser.
  • 3. A tool as claimed in claim 1, in which a circumferential barrel cam is defined in one of said piston and mandrel or body, a cam follower being disposed in the other of said piston and mandrel or body, the follower being within the barrel cam so that axial movement of the piston with respect to the mandrel or body, as the case may be, results in corresponding rotation of the piston with respect to the body or mandrel.
  • 4. A tool as claimed in claim 3, in which said tool is a drill-string stabiliser and said mandrel has wedge surfaces to engage corresponding surfaces on radially disposed pistons slidable in the body, whereby, when the mandrel moves from said deactivated to said activated position, the pistons extend from the body increasing the working diameter of the stabiliser, and in which the barrel cam is shaped so that movement of the piston in one axial stroke and return thereof results in relative rotation of the sleeve and said facing edge from a said in-phase position to a said out-of-phase position or vice versa.
  • 5. A tool as claimed in claim 4, in which said castellations are angularly spaced by a phase angle and said stroke and return of the piston results in relative rotation of the sleeve and said facing edge by said phase angle.
  • 6. A tool as claimed in any of claim 3, in which said pin has a relatively thin diameter end, and said barrel cam comprises a wide groove to receive a large diameter section of the pin and a deeper, narrow groove within said wide groove to receive said thin end of the pin.
  • 7. A tool as claimed in claim 1, in which one set of said castellations comprise an even number of alternating fingers and slots, and in which alternate fingers are longer than the remaining fingers, and the other set of castellations comprise the same number of alternating fingers and slots, and in which alternate slots are shorter than the remaining slots, whereby an intermediate position of the mandrel is defined when said longer fingers interdigitate with said shorter slots.
  • 8. A tool as claimed in claim 1, in which, when said mandrel is in said deactivated position, a rise in hydraulic pressure in the tool results in movement of the piston before movement of the mandrel.
  • 9. A tool as claimed in claim 1, in which said mandrel is moved by fluid pressure in the tool against the action of a second return spring, said second return spring being sufficiently stronger than said first return spring to ensure that, when said mandrel is in said deactivated position, a rise in hydraulic pressure in the tool results in movement of the piston before movement of the mandrel.
  • 10. A tool as claimed in claim 8, in which a spring loaded detent between said mandrel and body retains the mandrel ill said deactivated position until a threshold hydraulic pressure has been exceeded, which pressure is greater than that required to move said piston.
  • 11. A tool as claimed in claim 10, in which said detent comprises a plunger in a radial bore of the mandrel or body, spring biassed against a lip of the body or mandrel respectively.
  • 12. A tool us claimed in claim 11, in which said lip is of a circumferential groove around the body.
  • 13. A tool as claimed in claim 10, in which said plunger has a through bore connecting the space between the mandrel and body with a space behind the plunger so that hydraulic effects are substantially eliminated and it is said spring loading which primarily inhibits release of the detent.
  • 14. A tool as claimed in claim 11, in which said plunger has a through bore connecting the space between the mandrel and body with a space behind the plunger, and a check valve in said bore only permitting flow of fluid into said space behind the plunger, whereby hydraulic forces primarily inhibit release of the detent.
  • 15. A tool as claimed in claim 10, comprising a plurality of said detents arranged around the circumference of the mandrel.
  • 16. A tool as claimed in claim 1, in which the mandrel has a through bore and is sealed to the body about first and second circumferences, the first being a larger circumference upstream, in terms of fluid flow through the tool, of the second, smaller circumference.
  • 17. A tool as claimed in claim 16, in which the pistol has a through bore and is sealed to the mandrel about third and fourth circumferences, the third being a larger circumference upstream, in terms of fluid flow through the tool, of the fourth, smaller circumference.
  • 18. A tool as claimed in claim 17, in which the piston extends from the mandrel and is sealed to the body.
  • 19. A tool as claimed in claim 18, in which the seal between the body and mandrel about said second circumference, and the seal between the piston and mandrel about said fourth circumference, comprise an integrated seal between the piston and the body.
  • 20. A tool as claimed in claim 17, which in said activated position, the bore of the piston engages a plug in the bore of the body to create a flow restriction and consequent back pressure detectable to indicate the activation of the tool.
  • 21. A tool as claimed in claim 20, in which one set of said castellations comprise an even number of alternating fingers and slots, and in which alternate fingers are longer than the remaining fingers, and the other set of castellations comprise the same number of alternating fingers and slots, and in which alternate slots are shorter than the remaining slots, whereby an intermediate position of the mandrel is defined when said longer fingers interdigitate with said shorter slots, and in which the bore of said piston or the plug have sections of different diameter so that, in said activated, de-activated and intermediate positions of the mandrel, different constrictions are created so that different back pressures result.
  • 22. A tool as claimed in claim 20, in which one set of said castellations comprise an even number of alternating fingers and slots, and in which alternate fingers are longer than the remaining fingers, and the other set of castellations comprise the same number of alternating fingers and slots, and in which alternate slots are shorter than the remaining slots, whereby an intermediate position of the mandrel is defined when said longer fingers interdigitate with said shorter slots, and in which said bore has a circumferential groove near its end and said plug has a circumferential lip, such that a pressure pulse is generated when said piston first engages said lip and when said lip first engages the bore of the piston beyond said groove.
  • 23. A tool as claimed in claim 22, in which the bore of said piston or the plug have sections of different diameter so that, in said activated, de-activated and intermediate positions of the mandrel, different constrictions are created so that different back pressures result, and in which said groove and the bore of the piston provides said sections of different diameter so that said lip on the plug is either disengaged from said bore, engaged with said groove, or engaged with the bore of the piston in said de-activated, intermediate and activated positions of the mandrel respectively.
  • 24. An adjustable down-hole tool comprisinga body having a through bore; a mandrel axially movable in the body, the mandrel being movable by a fluid pressure in the tool between a first, activated position and a second deactivated position; a shoulder on the body; a sleeve, said sleeve between the shoulder and the mandrel; at least two sets of castellations, one set on one of said shoulder and mandrel and the other set on a facing edge or edges of the sleeve so that, when the castellations are in phase, the mandrel is prevented from, travelling from said first to second position and when they are out of phase they interdigitate, and the mandrel is not prevented from travelling from said first to second position; and means to rotate the sleeve relative to the mandrel between said in-phase and out-of-phase positions; wherein said means comprises a control piston slidable in the mandrel, being movable by fluid pressure in the tool against the action of a first return spring; and wherein one of said piston and mandrel is rotationally fixed with respect to the body.
  • 25. An adjustable down-hole tool comprisinga body having a through bore; a mandrel axially movable in the body, the mandrel being movable by fluid pressure in the tool between a first, activated position and a second deactivated position; a sleeve, said sleeve limiting movement of said mandrel between said positions; at least two sets of castellations, one set on the sleeve and the other set on an edge facing the castellations on the sleeve so that, when the castellations are in phase, the mandrel is prevented from travelling from said first to second position and when they are out of phase they interdigitate and the mandrel is not prevented from travelling from said, first to second position; and mean to rotate the sleeve relative to the facing edge between said in-phase and out-of-phase positions wherein said means comprises a control piston slidable in or on the mandrel and in the body and being movable by fluid pressure in the tool against the action of a first return spring and wherein said facing edge is on the piston and in which said piston is axially and rotationally slidable with respect to said sleeve, which sleeve is rotationally fixed in the body.
  • 26. A tool as claimed in claim 25, in which a circumferential barrel cam is defined in one of said piston and mandrel or body, a cam follower being disposed in the other of said piston and mandrel, or body, the follower being within the barrel cam so that axial movement of the piston with respect to the mandrel or body, as the case may be, results in corresponding rotation of the piston with respect to the body or mandrel, and in which said barrel cam and cam follower are disposed between said piston and sleeve, the sleeve being part of the body.
  • 27. A tool as claimed in claim 26, in which a component is rotationally mounted on the piston and on which component one of said barrel cam and cam follower is mounted and on which said facing edge is disposed.
  • 28. A tool as claimed in claim 25, in which said tool is a drill-string stabiliser and said mandrel has wedge surfaces to engage corresponding surfaces on radially disposed pistons slidable in the body, whereby, when the mandrel moves from said deactivated to said activated position, the pistons extend from the body increasing the working diameter of the stabiliser.
  • 29. A tool as claimed in claim 25, in which a circumferential barrel cam is defined in one of said piston and mandrel or body, a cam follower being disposed in the other of said piston and mandrel or body, the follower being within the barrel cam so that axial movement of the piston with respect to the mandrel or body, as the case may be, results in corresponding rotation of the piston with respect to the body or mandrel.
  • 30. A tool as claimed in claim 29, in which said tool is a drill-string stabiliser and said mandrel has wedge surfaces to engage corresponding surfaces on radially disposed pistons slidable in the body, whereby, when the mandrel moves from said deactivated to said activated position, the pistons extend from the body increasing the working diameter of the stabiliser, and in which the barrel cam is shaped so that movement of the piston in one axial stroke and return thereof results in relative rotation of the sleeve and said facing edge from a said in-phase position to a said out-of-phase position or vice versa.
  • 31. A tool as claimed in claim 30, in which said castellations are angularly spaced by a phase angle and said stroke and return of the piston results in relative rotation of the sleeve and said facing edge by said phase angle.
  • 32. A tool as claimed in any of claim 29, in which said pin has a relatively thin diameter end, and said barrel cam comprises a wide groove to receive a large diameter section of the pin and a deeper, narrow groove within said wide groove to receive said thin end of the pin.
  • 33. A tool as claimed in claim 25, in which one set of said castellations comprise an even number of alternating fingers and slots, and in which alternate fingers are longer than the remaining fingers, and the other set of castellations comprise the same number of alternating fingers and slots, and in which alternate slots are shorter than the remaining slots, whereby an intermediate position of the mandrel is defined when said longer fingers interdigitate with said shorter slots.
  • 34. A tool as claimed in claim 25, in which, when said mandrel is in said deactivated position, a rise in hydraulic pressure in the tool results in movement of the piston before movement of the mandrel.
  • 35. A tool as claimed in claim 25, in which said mandrel is moved by fluid pressure in the tool against the action of a second return spring, said second return spring being sufficiently stronger than said first return spring to ensure that, when said mandrel is in said deactivated position, a rise in hydraulic pressure in the tool results in movement of the piston before movement of the mandrel.
  • 36. A tool as claimed in claim 34, in which a spring loaded detent between said mandrel and body retains the mandrel in said deactivated position until a threshold hydraulic pressure has been exceeded, which pressure is greater than that required to move said piston.
  • 37. A tool as claimed in claim 36, in which said detent comprises a plunger in a radial bore of the mandrel or body, spring biassed against a lip of the body or mandrel respectively.
  • 38. A tool as claimed in claim 37, in which said lip is of a circumferential groove around the body.
  • 39. A tool as claimed in claim 36, in which said plunger has a through bore connecting the space between the mandrel and body with a space behind the plunger so that hydraulic effects are substantially eliminated and it is said spring loading which primarily inhibits release of the detent.
  • 40. A tool as claimed in claim 37, in which said plunger has a through bore connecting tile space between the mandrel and body with a space behind the plunger, and a check valve in said bore only permitting flow of fluid into said space behind the plunger, whereby hydraulic forces primarily inhibit release of the detent.
  • 41. A tool as claimed in claim 36, comprising a plurality of said detents arranged around the circumference of the mandrel.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
9905050 Mar 1999 GB
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This applications claims the benefit of application Ser. No. 9905050.2 filed in Great Britain on Mar. 5, 1999. Not Applicable.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/GB00/00775 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO00/53886 9/14/2000 WO A
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
5794694 Smith, Jr. Aug 1998 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2369136 May 2002 GB