1. Technical Field
Embodiments disclosed herein generally relate to the measurement of fluid properties. In particular, the disclosed embodiments are related to measuring a fluid density with a fluid densitometer, measuring a temperature of a fluid densitometer, and providing a correction to the measured fluid density based on the measured temperature.
2. Description of Related Art
There are many instances in industrial processes and controls for handling flowing fluids where the density of the moving fluid has to be determined accurately. One particular application is in the identification of reservoir fluids flowing in a well such as in a pumpout wireline formation tester (PWFT) or logging while drilling formation tester (LWDFT) used to collect reservoir fluid samples in a well drilled for hydrocarbon exploration. The in-situ determination of fluid density under reservoir conditions is of vital importance in formation evaluation. Water often co-exists with gaseous hydrocarbons and crude oil in some common geologic formations. As such, a mixture of water, gaseous hydrocarbons, and liquid hydrocarbons is often produced by a working oil well, and the mixture is ultimately separated at a downstream location. It is often desirable to determine the amount of oil that is produced in a stream flowing from a formation. Because the amount of oil produced in the stream will influence the density of the fluid, measuring the density of the fluid can provide a reasonable estimation as to the amount of oil in the fluid.
One example of a densitometer that can be used to measure the density of an unknown process fluid is a Coriolis mass flowmeter, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,491,025, issued to Smith et al. A Coriolis mass flowmeter may contain two parallel conduits, each typically being a U-shaped flow tube wherein each flow tube is driven such that it oscillates about an axis causing each tube to twist about a torsional axis to produce a slight deformation and deflection of the conduit proportional to the mass flow rate of the fluid. This deformation is normally measured as a small difference between the deflection at the inlet ends of the conduits compared to the deflection at the outlet ends. Both tubes are oppositely driven such that each tube behaves as a separate tine of a tuning fork and thereby cancels any undesirable vibrations that might otherwise mask the Coriolis forces. The resonant frequency at which each flow tube oscillates depends upon its total mass, i.e. the mass of the empty tube itself plus the mass of the fluid flowing therethrough. Inasmuch as the total mass will vary as the density of the fluid flowing through the tube varies, the resonant frequency will likewise vary with any changes in density.
Another example of a densitometer is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,491,009, issued to Reusch, wherein the density of an unknown fluid flowing through an oscillating flow tube is proportional to the square of the period at which the tube resonates. A further exemplary densitometer is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,378,364, by Pelletier et al., which is assigned to the same assignee as the present disclosure. Therein, a measurement device compares vibration frequencies from a sample cavity and a reference cavity to determine desired fluid properties.
However, due to the limited space in downhole applications, in most of the densitometers described above, the transmitter or driver is often located in close proximity to the receiver and may cause interference between the two components. The interference may distort the signal picked up on the receiver and cause difficulty in accurately recognizing the vibratory response of the flow tube. Thus, many of the prior art methods have used multiple flow tubes to create a reference point to cancel out external interference.
Moreover, most of the densitometers described above do not provide any correction for inaccuracies in the measured fluid density arising due to the temperature of the densitometer. Consequently, the densitometers provided above often provide inaccurate density measurements, particularly in environments having extreme or varying temperatures. Thus, there is a need for a sensor for determining a fluid density and for determining an associated temperature in order to provide a correction to the determined density based on the determined temperature.
Consistent with some embodiments, a sensor for measuring a density of a fluid. The sensor includes a flow tube for receiving the fluid and a vibration driver coupled to the flow tube, the vibration driver configured to drive the flow tube to vibrate. The sensor also includes a vibration detector coupled to the flow tube, the vibration detector detecting characteristics related to the vibrating flow tube, and a distributed temperature sensor coupled to the flow tube, the distributed temperature sensor measuring a temperature of the flow tube as the flow tube vibrates. The sensor further includes measurement circuitry coupled to the vibration detector and the distributed temperature sensor, the measurement circuitry determining a density of the fluid from the detected characteristics related to the vibrating flow tube and the measured temperature of the flow tube.
Consistent with some embodiments, there is further provided a temperature sensor for measuring a temperature of a fluid densitometer to provide temperature correction effects to a fluid density determined by the fluid densitometer. The temperature sensor includes a temperature-sensitive component attached along a length of the fluid densitometer, an excitation source coupled to the temperature-sensitive component, and measurement circuitry coupled to the temperature-sensitive component.
These and other embodiments will be described in further detail below, with reference to the following drawings.
Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like elements.
Device 100 also includes a rigid housing 114 and two bulkheads 116. Rigid housing 114 surrounds and protects a volume through which flow tube 104 passes and reduces the response to vibrations not associated with particular vibratory modes of flow tube 104. As shown in
Consistent with some embodiments, magnet 102 and coil 106 act as both a vibration source and a vibration detector. However, in other embodiments, magnet 102 and coil 106 may act as the vibration source or the detector while other components act as the other of the vibration source or detector. In such embodiments, the other of the vibration source or detector may be another magnet and coil arrangement, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,686,176, by Pelletier et al., which assigned to the same assignee as the present disclosure. Returning to
Further consistent with some embodiments, measurement circuitry 110 may include a spectral analyzer configured to perform a specific transform on the time-based voltage function. Alternatively, measurement circuitry 110 may include a processor configured to execute instructions stored in a memory coupled to the processor to perform a specific transform on the time-based voltage function and then execute further instructions stored in the memory to calculate a fluid density from a resonance frequency determined from the specific transform. As yet another alternative, measurement circuitry 110 may include application specific circuitry configured to perform a specific transform, determine a resonance frequency, and then determine a fluid density from the determined resonance frequency. Furthermore, measurement circuitry 110 may also include components capable of calculating further properties of the fluid, such as a viscosity of the fluid and a temperature of flow tube 104.
For example, the motion of flow tube 104 as it vibrates may be described by the following equation:
where t is time, ψ is a transverse displacement of an element on flow tube 104, x is a distance of the element from one end of flow tube 104, E is an elastic modulus of flow tube, I is an area moment of inertia of flow tube 104, mL is a linear density of the fluid inside flow tube 304, mT is a linear density of material used to form flow tube 104, fP is force on flow tube 104 due to pressure, fT is additional tensile forces on flow tube 104, fC is the Coriolis force, fV is a force on flow tube 104 due to fluid flow, and fM is an additional mass loading due to the presence of magnet 102. From detailed force analysis, it can be shown that the forces are given by:
where T is a tension in flow tube 104, V is a flow velocity of the fluid in flow tube 104, M is the mass of magnet 102, x1 is a location of magnet 102 on flow tube 104, and δ(x−x1) is a Dirac delta-functions at x1. When temperature, pressure, and fluid density are known, the differential equation can be solved to yield the wave number β0 that is related to the resonance frequency f0 of the flow tube 104 as a function of fluid density:
This equation may then by inverted to obtain a relationship of the density of the fluid in flow tube 104 as a function of the resonance frequency f0 of the flow tube 104. Consistent with some embodiments, measurement circuitry 110 may apply the above equations to determine a resonance frequency, and then determine a fluid density from the determined resonance frequency.
As shown in
Although device 100 allows for the determination of a fluid density, the determined fluid density may suffer from inaccuracies relating to a temperature of flow tube 104, or even a temperature of a fluid. As is known, density varies with changing pressure and/or temperature. Thus, although device 100 may provide reasonable accuracy in ideal conditions, in environments where temperature is not ideal or is rapidly changing, the determined fluid density may be inaccurate. Moreover, device 100 determines the fluid density by first determining a resonant frequency of flow tube 104. Flow tube 104 has an associated elastic modulus depending on the material from which flow tube 104 is made, and the associated elastic modulus has a strong dependence on the temperature of the material. Furthermore, discrete temperature sensors cannot be attached to flow tube 104 due to the vibration of flow tube 104. Not only would the manufacture or attachment of a discrete temperature sensor provide difficulties in ensuring that the discrete temperature sensor remain attached while flow tube vibrates, but the attached discrete temperature sensor would also dampen the vibrations of flow tube 104 leading to inaccurate density measurements based on the resonant frequency. Consequently, there is a need for a densitometer which also measures the temperature of the densitometer to provide a correction to the determined fluid density based on the measured temperature.
R=R0[1+α(T−T0)] (8),
where R is a resistance of metallic wire 202, at temperature T, R0 is a resistance of the conductor at temperature T0, and α=temperature coefficient of resistance. By detecting a voltage induced in metallic wire 202, measurement circuitry may then determine resistance R of metallic wire 202, and use the determined resistance to calculate the temperature of flow tube 104 using equation (8). The determined temperature can then be used to apply a correction to the determined fluid density to provide a more accurate determination of the determined fluid density. Although device 200 illustrates a single magnet 102 and coil 106 arrangement as a vibration driver and vibration detector, other vibration drivers and vibration detectors may be used, such as additional magnet-coil arrangements, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,686,176, by Pelletier et al., which is assigned to the same assignee as the present disclosure.
According to some embodiments, metallic wire 202 may be used as a vibration detector and further used to determine a density of fluid in flow tube 104. In a manner similar to determining a temperature of flow tube 104, a known current I is applied to metallic wire 202 from wire current source 204 that produces a voltage V in metallic wire 202 based on a resistance R of metallic wire. As flow tube 104 vibrates, it also bends, which creates mechanical stress along the length of flow tube 104. This created mechanical stress produces variations in resistance R of metallic wire 202 which, according to Ohm's Law, will also create voltage variations in metallic wire 202. The voltage variations are detected by measurement circuitry 110 and used to calculate a resonance frequency in the same way as discussed above with respect to
According to some embodiments, strain gauge 402 may be used as a vibration detector and further used to determine a density of fluid in flow tube 104. In a manner similar to determining a temperature of flow tube 104, a known current I is applied to strain gauge 402 from wire current source 404 that produces a voltage V in strain gauge 402 based on a resistance R of strain gauge 402. As flow tube 104 vibrates, it also bends, which creates mechanical stress along the length of flow tube 104. This created mechanical stress produces variations in resistance R of strain gauge 402 which, according to Ohm's Law, will also create voltage variations in strain gauge 402. The voltage variations are detected by measurement circuitry 110 and used to calculate a resonance frequency in the same way as discussed above with respect to
where ν is the frequency of the incident light, νa is the frequency of the anti-Stokes scattered light, νs is the frequency of the Stokes scattered light, T is absolute temperature, and h and kB are respectively the well known the Plank constant and Boltzmann constant. Thus fiber optic sensor 502 may be used to determine a temperature of flow tube 104.
According to some embodiments, fiber optic sensor 502 may be used as a vibration detector and further used to determine a density of fluid in flow tube 104. In a manner similar to determining a temperature of flow tube 104, as flow tube 104 vibrates, it also bends which creates mechanical stress along the length of flow tube 104. This created mechanical stress will influence the effective refractive index ηeff of Bragg grating 508 and thus produce changes in the light that is transmitted through fiber optic sensor 502 from light source 510. Consequently, measurement circuitry 110 may include an optical sensor that is able to detect these changes and use the changes of light to determine the mechanical stress of flow tube 104 from the vibration of flow tube 104 to determine a resonance frequency of flow tube 104. The density of the fluid flowing through flow tube 104 may then be determined from the determined resonance frequency. Thus, fiber optic sensor 502 may be used to determine a temperature of tube 104 and a fluid density of a fluid in flow tube 104.
Consistent with some embodiments, using metallic wire 202 (or strain gauge 402 or optic sensor 502) wrapped around flow tube 104, the hoop stress of flow tube 104 may be determined. Under a pressure P, a flow tube such as flow tube 104, with inner radius b and outer radius a will experience expansion in its outer radius by
where E is the elastic modulus of flow tube 104, and v is the Poisson's ratio of flow tube 104. The change in radius Δa results in a change in the outer circumference (2πa) of the tube which in turn results in minute change in the resistance R of metallic wire 202 wrapped around flow tube 104. This resistance change ΔR may then be measured using well known methods, such as using a quarter-bridge Wheatstone bridge composed of metallic wire 202 and three dummy resistors and excited by a voltage Vbr, such that the strain ε from pressure P may be determined by
where S is a strain sensitivity factor determined by the material of metallic wire 202. Because the strain ε may be equal to
knowing the strain ε from pressure P and the change in radius Δa, the pressure P from the fluid in flow tube 104 can be determined using equation (10). Once the pressure P is determined, measurement circuitry 110 may then determine the hoop stress σθ of flow tube 104 using the equation
where P is the internal pressure from the fluid, t is the thickness of the wall of flow tube 104, and r is the radius of flow tube 104.
Consequently, embodiments described herein provide improvements in the design of fluid densitometers. For example, embodiments described herein use a distributed temperature sensor attached to the densitometer to measure a temperature of the densitometer to provide a temperature correction to a fluid density measured by the densitometer. Other embodiments described herein provide a densitometer wherein the components used to measure the temperature are also used in determining the fluid density. Other embodiments provide a densitometer capable of measuring not only the density of the fluid, but also a pressure of the fluid and a temperature of the densitometer, using the same components. Embodiments described herein are exemplary only. One skilled in the art may recognize various alternative embodiments from those specifically disclosed. Those alternative embodiments are also intended to be within the scope of this disclosure. As such, the embodiments are limited only by the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/041262 | 6/21/2011 | WO | 00 | 3/12/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/177241 | 12/27/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3967490 | Brady | Jul 1976 | A |
4132110 | Muramoto | Jan 1979 | A |
4170128 | Kratky et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4491009 | Ruesch | Jan 1985 | A |
4491025 | Smith et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4602498 | Glikberg et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
5115683 | Pratt | May 1992 | A |
5351561 | Wenger et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5365794 | Hussain et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5379649 | Kalotay | Jan 1995 | A |
5533381 | Seale | Jul 1996 | A |
5827979 | Schott et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5929344 | Hays et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5965824 | Kishiro et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6205865 | Hussain | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6327915 | Van Cleve et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6378364 | Pelletier et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6543281 | Pelletier et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6647160 | Chi et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6688176 | Storm, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6732570 | Francisco, Jr. | May 2004 | B2 |
6868740 | Hussain | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6912904 | Storm, Jr. et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7194902 | Goodwin et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7222671 | Caudwell et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7549319 | Headrick | Jun 2009 | B2 |
8302491 | Stack | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8573031 | Jensen et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20020184940 | Storm, Jr. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030208325 | Keilty et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040123645 | Storm, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20070186684 | Pham | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080115577 | Headrick | May 2008 | A1 |
20090173146 | Pursch | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100201118 | Anton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100268469 | Harrison et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110167910 | Storm et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110219872 | Hussain et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120310579 | Yan et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130139612 | Wang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 7, 2011, in related International Application No. PCT/US2011/041262. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 13, 2012, in related International Application No. PCT/US2012/036372. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and the Written Opinion dated Jan. 9, 2014, in related International Application No. PCT/US2011/041262. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130180330 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |