1. Field of the Invention
The preferred embodiment relates generally to bottle dispensers such as those used to dispense fluids and sauces, and more specifically it relates to a dispenser and system that is efficacious for use in higher volume applications, such as restaurants or certain industrial uses, and is also adaptable to medium- and high-volume filling operations.
2. Background
Squeeze bottle dispensers are commonly used to dispense sauces such as mustard, ketchup, dressings, and the like. One of the most common sauce dispensers is one in which most consumers are very familiar, the common squeezable, plastic mustard bottle, such as the one used by French's® mustard. Its use is easy to understand and easy to use by simply removing the cap, turning it upside down, squeezing the plastic bottle and dispensing the sauce from a pointed tip in the cap. After use it is stored in the refrigerator in an upright position. One of the primary problems associated with the use of this traditional plastic squeeze bottle is wastage, as it is difficult to extract the last remaining contents. It is an inconvenience when trying to dispense the remaining contents from the squeeze bottle as users have to turn the bottle upside down and shake it several times in order to extract the remaining sauce. The squeeze bottle dispenser is unlike that of a toothpaste tube, which can be flattened to squeeze out the last remaining toothpaste. Another problem with this type of bottle is that it is not easy to refill and is instead thrown away, contributing substantially to the waste stream.
Dispensers used in restaurants and higher volume fast food chains have partially addressed the problems associated with the ordinary plastic squeeze bottle. One of the more popular brands is Tablecraft®. These restaurant bottles tend to be larger, cylindrical and more recently, some are dispensed and stored in an inverted disposition. The inverted bottles are able to dispense liquid sauces by using specialty valves that are more or less, leak-resistant. In other words, the sauce will dispense when the bottle is squeezed, but the sauce does not leak out when the squeezing pressure is released and when the bottle is stored in an inverted disposition. The primary benefits of the inverted bottle to restaurants is that users can quickly grasp and dispense sauces without turning the bottle upside down, and perhaps more important, the contents are always ready for dispensing since they will settle in the bottom of the bottle, where the special leak-resistant dispensing valve is located. Examples of this type of dispenser is the FIFO® bottom dispensing bottle and the more recently the single-use bottle used by H.J. Heinz® for its ketchup, which is sold in the supermarket retail trade. Another benefit of a bottom dispensing bottle for the fast food trade is that it can be refilled, helping to reduce the trash stream compared to single-use bottles. However, the uses of these dispensers have created new problems, most importantly ones associated with sanitation, productivity and waste.
While it may be advantageous to refill the inverted bottle, as is the case in most high-volume fast food restaurants, the bottle must be washed out thoroughly in between uses to prevent the build up of bacteria and contamination. Likewise, the large bulk containers create new environmental concerns since they also contribute to the trash stream and if the contents are not properly stored and handled, they can become contaminated as well. Washing and refilling the inverted bottles is a time consuming, and at times tedious task, when attempting to remove all of the caked-on sauces that may accumulate on the bottle and in the valve.
Various attempts have been made over the years to produce a dispenser that can evacuate all the contents, beginning with U.S. Pat. No. 2,608,320 Harrison. His invention provides a pump type of dispenser that employs an air pressure system for ejecting a material (substance) inside renewal cartridges that has a movable member bonded to a rigid member. Its intended use was for products such as shaving cream and toothpaste. Methods to manufacture this type of cartridge today would be cost prohibitive, let alone in 1953.
Another attempt is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,920 Reiboldt, et. al. In the '920 patent, it utilizes a relatively complex support tube (sometimes called a birdcage) that is attached to a lid component, inserted inside a bag filled with fluid contents, and which lid/birdcage is secured to a squeezable bottle. Typically the lid serves as a dispensing fitment, such as may be used for toothpaste or other viscous materials. The approach has merit as it may use reusable bags for its contents, however, cleaning the birdcage/lid/fitment combination presents a challenging proposition if it were to be used in a high volume application, plus the cost of the combination unit would be costly based on today's standards. In the present day high-volume sauce dispensing industry it would be inconceivable such an expensive, difficult to wash dispenser would be used. It is more suitable for single-use retail applications.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,305,577, Fillmore uses a narrow necked pouch and hanger to accomplish a similar result for viscous fluids. The '577 invention uses a rather sophisticated [rigid] hanger/pouch assembly with a flexible bag (to be filled with viscous contents) bonded to the hanger. The result is substantially the same as the '920 or '320 patent in that an inversion of the flexible bag will take place. Like the '920 and '320 patents, its cost and limitation of use is also restricted to low-volume or single-use, retail applications.
Mueller in U.S. Pat. No. 6,364,163 accomplishes essentially the same outcome as well but uses a rod and piston to guide a plunger which dispenses the fluid contained in the bag. Yawagaki in U.S. Pat. No. 5,303,852 also accomplishes a similar objective with the use of an internal bag, one that is thermally welded to a mounting sleeve. Like all of the previously described patents, however, both of these dispensers are costly, and the bag designs with its fitments, or thermal welds, are too costly for high-volume use.
Other than the inverted dispensing bottle, all of the prior art inventions are impractical for high-volume use in restaurants and in particular, fast food chains. The expense of the dispensers and the various hangers, birdcage/cap assemblies, pistons and so on, are prohibitive for high-volume, low cost, restaurant chains. The use of rigid support members also make their use difficult, if not impractical for squeeze bottle applications since the rigid support members are located in the ideal spot in which users want to squeeze, the lower middle portion of the bottle. The cleaning of the various elements and components is difficult, reuse is cumbersome at best, and the cost for the complex bag configurations is too high for high volume use. In addition, the combination of many internal components and a seamed bag creates additional areas where product residue becomes trapped and creates unnecessary waste. While the use of the inverted refillable dispenser may be desirable in restaurants, serious questions have been raised regarding the critical need to thoroughly wash the dispensers between uses to prevent bacteria and contamination, the productivity problems associated with washing and refilling, and the questionable environmental qualities of the bulk containers.
The use of a low-cost dispenser and sauce refill system that can overcome the numerous problems associated with prior art would be valuable to the restaurant trade and many others. Not one of the prior art products or patents is suitable for, or can be adapted or modified to accomplish, the dispensing of fluids and liquids as desired by the preferred embodiment. This coupled with an efficacious method of pre-filling an internal liner and likewise reduce waste would be highly desirable for high-volume, high productivity uses, such as restaurants and the like.
Systems and methods are disclosed for dispensing a sauce with a dispenser system with an elongated dispenser bottle, a bottom dispensing cap, an inversion tube having a squeezable mid-section; and a pre-filled liner adapted to be inserted into the dispenser bottle, wherein the pre-filled liner includes viscous materials therein for delivery when the inversion tube is squeezed on or below the squeezable mid-section. During use, the user can grasp the bottle on or below a bottle mid-section; squeeze the bottle to increase internal pressure in the bottle and forcing sauce out of the bottle; and upon release, the system allows air to enter and replace the forced-out sauce and neutralizes the pressure in a space between the liner and an interior of the bottle.
The dispenser, liner, and system of the preferred embodiment overcomes the problems associated with prior art. It also provides the added benefit of being able to be cost-effectively filled using present day production processes, which is not possible with prior art. Also of importance is that the preferred embodiment overcomes the need to wash and refill the dispensers and eliminates the sanitation problems associated with storing open bulk containers of sauces and fluids. The preferred embodiment is the only invertible liner (or cartridge as it may appear when filled and lidded) that can be effectively squeezed at the most desirable location, the lower middle portion of the bottle, as it uses a unique internal inversion tube that provides the desired rigidity and yet flexibility. Other major advantages of the preferred embodiment are that it substantially reduces waste, its use is intuitive to any restaurant employee, and requires virtually no training. These advantages alone can save a restaurant chain hundreds of thousands, even millions, of dollars a year. The simplicity of the design of the preferred embodiment includes a low cost dispenser squeezable bottle (preferably of the inverted style), a liner and an inner inversion tube. All of its components are exceptionally low cost in comparison to prior art. All components may be made with the most cost-effective, state of the art means used in industry today, thus the cost is far lower. Obviously the cost of a pre-filled liner/inversion tube cartridge of the preferred embodiment is substantially less than the cost of a pre-filled squeeze bottle, which also represents a substantial savings to restaurants. The cost of the liner/inversion tube of the preferred embodiment compared to all the prior art patents is from 30% to 80% less.
The unique tapered design of the liner and the inversion tube are perfectly matched, which maximizes evacuation of the contents, reduces waste and improves productivity. The taper is optimized for nesting which aids in the shipping and handling process during filling. Unlike prior art, there is no need to bond or attach the inversion tube to the liner, or the dispenser, as the inversion tube fits snugly inside the liner so they function as a single unit. Since the inversion tube is not affixed to the dispenser and is disposable, no cleaning is required. The nesting of the tapered inversion tubes provides easy extraction and insertion during the filling process. The inversion tube and liner of the preferred embodiment may be manufactured as two separate components or as one single molded piece as will be illustrated. In either case the dispensing is essentially the same. During filling, however, the insertion step is eliminated with the one-piece component. A single step may also be used if the liner may also be shipped with the inversion tube inserted inside.
The tapered liner used in the preferred embodiment may be formed using a deep-draw thermoform operation and has no seams. Upon dispensing, it provides a smooth, effortless inversion inside the inversion tube, and being seamless, it conforms to the inner contour of the inversion tube without forming pockets, cavities or crevices where sauces or fluids may collect, thus the contents are evacuated with minimal waste. The unique deep-draw thermoform process used to make the liner is relatively new, but the filling with fluids and sauces may be performed on traditional filling lines.
Unlike prior art, the thermoformed liners can also be made with food-related barrier properties to increase shelf life, yet still remain soft and flexible enough to invert properly so that waste is minimized.
Also unlike other prior art products the raw material composition and design of the inversion tube is such that it is rigid enough to support inversion of the liner, yet flexible enough to be squeezed in its lower region, where the inversion tube is located. This is important because the natural location (sweet spot) for most users to grasp a squeeze bottle and start squeezing is in the mid- to lower-section. This would be difficult, if not impossible with prior art.
Furthermore, unlike the complicated prior art systems with their components, fitments, welds and so on, the pre-filled liners in the system of the preferred embodiment can be easily, quickly loaded into the bottle dispenser. The liner's flange naturally seats itself in the dispenser bottle and requires no bonding or other attachment to it as required with certain prior art. The user simply inserts the liner/inversion tube into the dispenser bottle, screws on the cap, and starts squeezing.
The squeeze bottle used in the preferred embodiment is also unlike the prior art systems in that it is a simple design with few components and its use is similar to the standard squeeze bottles currently used at home and in industry. The bottle only requires one opening on one end, unlike the complicated systems requiring top and bottom access and/or caps.
The valves in the dispenser of the preferred embodiment prevent leakage and reduce waste and likewise prevent air, gases and bacteria from entering the product. It may be stored in any environment suitable to maintain proper sanitation for the type of fluid contained.
Since the liners of the preferred embodiment are pre-filled, the common problem of the contents coming into contact and leaching on to the interior of a squeeze bottle is eliminated, thus preventing cross contamination from a previously used bottle dispenser. This also prevents discoloration of the squeeze bottle since there is no contact with the contents. This substantially increases the life of the squeeze bottle, which may in turn be used for different types of sauces without being tainted by discoloration. Then again, once the sauce has been completely used, instead of tediously washing the dispenser bottle after use, a new pre-filled liner is slipped into place instead.
The disposable liners of the preferred embodiment completely eliminate the unsanitary task of trans-filling and funneling products from large bulk sauce bags or cans into the traditional squeeze bottle. Its use likewise completely eliminates the common problem of “topping off” when filling prior art squeeze bottles, which may harbor bacteria in the residue in the bottle from prior use. Topping off is a big problem in the restaurant trade as the residue and fugitive particles from prior use frequently remain in the bottom of the squeeze bottle leaving a breeding ground for bacteria and an unsanitary environment.
The dispenser bottle of the preferred embodiment may use a combination of a one-way umbrella valve to allow air to enter the bottle but not escape, and a one-way duckbill valve which closes tightly after dispensing a fluid. Both prevent air or gases reaching the contents and maintain the interior of the bottle in a sanitary vacuum thus, preserving freshness and increasing shelf life. Unlike other prior art the filled dispenser bottle and liner/inversion tube system of the preferred embodiment can be used and stored both upside down or right side up, depending on the users preference.
Another substantial benefit of the preferred embodiment is that it is able to dispense a wide variety of products including thick viscous products, thin products, and even fluids that contain heavy particulates. If preferred a choice of a variety of duckbill valves can also be used with various slits and durometers to dispense various products. If needed, a dome valve or something similar may be used in combination with the duckbill valve to take pressure off of the head of the duckbill valve and prevent thin fluids, such as vinegar, from leaking when stored upside down for long periods.
Because the dispensing system is pressurized and holds the contents in a vacuum, the contents are always ready to be instantly dispensed with a gentle squeeze, regardless of whether the bottle has been stored right side up or upside down. Unlike the traditional squeeze bottles, this system never requires banging or shaking and never spits or burps. The pressurized system reduces waste and increases overall productivity and performance.
The preferred embodiment may also be used with a pump or spray bottle instead of a valve such as the duckbill or dome valve. The same pressurized technology will suspend the fluid contents in a vacuum and reduce waste and dispense with ease. With the spray application the dispenser bottle of the preferred embodiment is able to spray 360 degrees while holding it at any angle including upside down. Since the fluid being sprayed is always at the top it never spits or misfires. Likewise with a pump, it may swivel about the cap and pump its contents upside down or right side up.
The objectives of the preferred embodiment are to provide:
Furthermore, it is an object of this application to illustrate the preferred embodiments and broadly state the methodologies that may be used in order to describe the primary objective being accomplished.
a is a perspective view the dispenser system illustrated in
b is a perspective view the dispenser system illustrated in
In
Bottle 20 of dispenser 10 is typically made of a squeezable material much like that of traditional squeeze bottles used today such as Heinz Ketchup or a Tablecraft bottle, model #124. It has a single open end 26, which receives cap 30. Tightening cap 30 onto bottle 20 securely seats liner 40 at its flange 46, which is tightly secured between bottle 20 and cap 30. Securing cartridges, inserts, and various items by the use of a flange is commonly known in many trades. The typical method is from the pressure of the tightened cap, however other combinations may also serve the same purpose, as, for example, a snap on cap, or a combination snap on and twist and turn a quarter arc style of cap. The importance here is that liner 40 (with its inversion tube 50 inside) is secured in place between bottle 20 and cap 30 and that air is not allowed to escape. This secure closure is what helps maintain the pressurized bottle of the preferred embodiment.
The one-way umbrella valve 24 at the end of bottle 20 serves two essential functions. First, after dispenser bottle 20 is squeezed and contents are dispensed, one-way umbrella valve 24 allows air to enter the bottle, thus neutralizing space S between liner 40 and the inside of bottle body 42, which in turn causes the contents inside liner 40 to remain, more or less in a vacuum state, (as shown in detail in
Cap 30 of the preferred embodiment is typically a molded plastic piece that has a centrally located, flexible dispensing valve, such as duckbill valve 34. Being a one-way valve, it allows for contents, fluids, sauces, and the like, to evacuate, in other words, to be dispensed from dispenser 10 when bottle 20 is squeezed and pressurized. The purpose of feet 36a, 36b, and 36c is so that a user may store dispenser 10 in an inverted (upside down) position for a more efficacious dispensing without allowing duckbill valve 34 to touch a counter top. As illustrated in
As illustrated in
In
As shown in
Once liner 40 has had inversion tube 50 inserted, it is filled with contents C and then top open end 45 is sealed with a lid 60. As illustrated lid 60 is sealed to liner flange 46 in a similar manner as a foil lid is used to seal the tops of yogurt containers. The process of attaching lid 60 such as that shown in
In
While nesting is the preferred manner in which to ship and handle inversion tubes of the preferred embodiment, it is not essential. They may be shipped and handled in bulk form or may be in some form of internal manufacturing process where they are made in the same plant as the filling operation. Likewise the amount of taper depends on several factors including the length of the tube, and/or the degree of desirable taper to take advantage of space savings with deeper nesting. It also depends on the thickness of the outer wall. Generally speaking, in most sauce related applications such as ketchup and mustard, the thickness would be about 0.012 to 0.0020 depending on the type of material used. What is of most importance and is completely unlike all prior art sleeves, is that inversion tube 50 has a unique characteristic of being rigid, to induce inversion of liner 40 inside inversion tube 50, and likewise have the flexibility to be squeezed in a natural dispensing operation, both of which is described in detail in
The inversion tube illustrated in
The unique versatility and simplicity of the preferred embodiment in the perspectives as illustrated in
In
In
In
In
One-piece liner 70 may or may not be slightly tapered with its larger open end 75 being slightly larger than its closed end 74. The purpose of the taper is essentially the same as previous described in that it would provide lower shipping costs (if manufactured outside the filling facility) and is easier to handle in the filling process. The obvious other benefit of the taper of one piece liner 70 is that it promotes inversion with the narrow upper portion 77 inverting itself into thicker lower portion 79. In the illustration in
One-piece liner 70 (empty as illustrated) may be filled in essentially the same manner as liner 40 illustrated in
The inline thermoform, fill and seal (TFS) process 100 in
The TFS system may also be effectively employed by using a liner inserter (not illustrated) using preformed liners instead of using liner film 110 and thermoforming dies 120. Likewise, a one-piece liner as illustrated in
The spirit of the preferred embodiment provides a breadth of scope that includes all methods of making and using it and the processes of dispensing and filling. Any variation on the theme and methodology of accomplishing the same that are not described herein would be considered under the scope of the preferred embodiment.
This application is a divisional application of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/476,210, filed on May 21, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,960,502, entitled the same and claiming the benefits of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/574,392, filed on Aug. 1, 2011, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/572,609, filed on Jul. 18, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/520,573, filed on Jun. 8, 2011, all are which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61520573 | Jun 2011 | US | |
61572609 | Jul 2011 | US | |
61574392 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13476210 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14628588 | US |