The disclosure relates to fluid dispensers.
Hand washing is important in many industries, including hospitality (hotels, restaurants, etc.) and healthcare (hospitals, nursing homes, etc.). In addition, there are many other applications in which the dispensing of various fluids occurs. To facilitate hand washing, for example, fluid dispensers that dispense hand cleansing products may be placed near sinks of a kitchen, washroom, or other location. Such fluid dispensers house a disposable or refillable product container, such as a cartridge or flexible bag, containing a supply of the fluid product to be dispensed. The fluid may include, for example, foams, liquids, and/or gels. The dispensers are generally wall mounted and include a hinged cover which permits opening and closing of the dispenser housing so that the supply of fluid product may be refilled or replaced. Some fluid dispensers are manually actuated by pushing or pulling a handle, bar, or button on the dispenser. Others dispense automatically by sensing presence of a user or the user's hands near the dispenser.
In general the disclosure is directed to fluid dispensers and fluid dispense mechanisms providing increased mechanical advantage as the dispense mechanism is moved throughout its range of motion.
In one example, the disclosure is directed to a dispenser comprising a housing, a reservoir positioned in the housing that contains a supply of a fluid to be dispensed, and a dispense mechanism configured to dispense a discrete quantity of the fluid from the reservoir, the dispense mechanism comprising a lever member having a first lever section accessible on an exterior side of the housing, a second lever section, and a fulcrum connected between the first lever section and the second lever section, the fulcrum pivotally supported within the housing such that the lever member is moveable between a rest position and a dispense position upon application of an input force to the first lever section, wherein movement of the lever member between the rest position and the dispense position results in application of an output force by the second lever section, and an actuator configured to receive application of the output force from the second lever section, a pump configured to receive the output force from the actuator and apply a corresponding dispensing force to the reservoir to dispense the discrete quantity of fluid from the reservoir, the second lever section configured to provide at least two contacts points with the actuator as the lever member is moved from the rest position to the dispense position, the second lever section comprising a base segment connected to the fulcrum and providing a first contact point with the actuator and a branch segment connected distally adjacent to the base segment and providing a second contact points with the actuator, the base segment having a thickness that is relatively greater than a thickness of the branch segment, such that a mechanical advantage provided at the first contact point is relatively greater than a mechanical advantage provided at a second contact point, such that an output force applied to the actuator at the first contact point is relatively greater than an output force applied to the actuator at the second contact point.
The drive length of the first contact point may be relatively shorter than a drive length provided by the second contact point. The base segment of the second lever section may apply the output force to the actuator during a first portion of a dispensing stroke and the branch segment of the second lever section may apply the output force to the actuator during a second portion of the dispensing stroke. The fluid product may comprise one of a liquid, a gel, or a foam. The lever member may comprise one of a push bar, a push button, or a handle.
The details of one or more examples are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
In general the disclosure is directed to fluid dispensers and fluid dispense mechanisms providing increased mechanical advantage as the dispense mechanism is moved throughout its range of motion. Dispensing of fluid products, such as liquids, gels, foams, etc., is becoming increasingly difficult due to the demand for fluid products having increased concentration, thickness, and quality. These product properties result in a product that is more difficult to dispense, and thus require more force to actuate the dispensing pump. However, dispenser manufacturers must at the same time comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which states that the force required to activate the controls of a hand soap dispenser in places of public accommodation or commercial facilities shall be no greater than 5 lbf (pounds of force).
Example dispenser 100 includes a housing 110 having a front cover 102 and a back plate 104. A reservoir 112 (see
As shown in
In addition to push bar 120, the dispense mechanism of dispenser 100 further includes an actuator 116. Application of an input force to push bar 120 results in a corresponding application of an output force to actuator 116. In response to application of the output force, actuator mechanically activates a pump 114 resulting in dispensation of the discrete quantity of the fluid 108 from reservoir 112.
The ratio of the output force (FB) to the input force (FA), or mechanical advantage (MA), may be used as a measure of the force amplification of a lever. The concept of mechanical advantage may be applied to a push bar of a fluid dispenser, such as push bar 150 shown in
In this example, the output force FB and thus the mechanical advantage provided by the push bar in
In operation, application of a force by a user to first lever section 202 in a direction generally indicated by arrow 203 causes push bar 200 to pivot on the axis provided by hinge 206. As shown in
Referring now to
The mechanical advantage provided by the relatively shorter drive length, MAshort, in this example may be defined by:
The mechanical advantage provided by the relatively longer drive length, MAlong, in this example may be defined by:
Because push bar 200 first contacts actuator 210 with the short drive length, c, the mechanical advantage applied at the beginning of the dispenser operation is relatively higher than the mechanical advantage applied toward the end of the dispenser operation. This allows the pump to start dispensing with a relatively smaller amount of input force required from the user.
As push bar 200 rotates about hinge 206, actuator 210 is contacted by long drive length, b, and the MA is decreased as compared to the short drive length, c. In addition, the longer drive length defined by the length b reduces the angle, indicated by reference numeral 207, through which push bar 200 must travel to completely depress the pump. This may help to keep push bar 202 clear of the discharge spray 218, as shown in
MAd≧MAc≧MAb.
Because push bar 240 first contacts actuator 250 with the short drive length, c, the mechanical advantage applied at the beginning of the dispenser operation is relatively higher than the mechanical advantage applied toward the end of the dispenser operation, when push bar 240 is contacting actuator 250 with the relatively longer drive length b.
In operation, second lever section 264 first applies an output force upon contact surface 272 at the relatively shorter drive length c. Then, as the rotation of push bar 260 continues, application of the force transitions to the relatively longer drive length b. Thus, as push bar 260 is moved through its range of motion, the mechanical advantage provided upon initial application of a dispensing force (MAc provided by drive length c by contact point 265) is relatively larger than the mechanical advantage provided during the latter portion of the stroke (MAb provided by drive length b by contact point 267). This relationship may be expressed by the following equation:
MAc≧MAb.
Because push bar 260 first contacts actuator 270 with the short drive length, c, the mechanical advantage applied at the beginning of the dispenser operation is relatively higher than the mechanical advantage applied during the latter portion of the dispenser operation, when push bar 260 is contacting actuator 270 with the relatively longer drive length b.
Alternatively, push bar 260 may be configured to provide multiple points of contact. For example, second lever section 264 may include a base segment, such as base segment 292, connected to hinge 266 and providing a first contact point 265. Second lever section 264 may further include one or more branch segments connected distally adjacent to the base segment 261 and providing a corresponding one or more contact points. In this example, to provide for multiple contact points, the base segment and each of the one or more branch segments may have differing thicknesses to provide the multiple contact points. For example, each branch segment may have a relatively smaller thickness than the proximally adjacent branch segment.
Although specific example fluid dispensers are shown and described herein that provide for multiple points of contact during dispenser operation, it shall be understood that many other variations of the fluid dispensing mechanism may also be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. For example, the actuator and/or the push bar may be configured in a variety of different ways to provide for multiple points of contact during actuation of the dispenser. For example, an actuator may be configured to include any desired number of contact surfaces to provide multiple points of contact with a push bar, thus providing a corresponding number of different drive lengths throughout the range of motion of the push bar. In addition or in the alternative, a push bar may be configured to include any desired number of contact points to provide multiple points of contact with an actuator throughout its range of motion. As another example, both the actuator and the push bar may be configured to provide multiple points of contact corresponding to a different number of drive lengths through the range of motion of the push bar. It shall be understood, therefore, that the disclosure is not limited to the specific examples shown and described herein, that many other variations of actuator and/or push bar configurations may be used, and that the disclosure is not limited in this respect.
Various examples have been described. These and other examples are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/768,110, filed on Feb. 15, 2013, entitled, “FLUID DISPENSERS WITH INCREASED MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2898009 | Green | Aug 1959 | A |
3458090 | Scoggin, Jr. | Jul 1969 | A |
3540630 | Brown | Nov 1970 | A |
3971237 | Rasmussen | Jul 1976 | A |
4036406 | Jespersen et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4084729 | Epple | Apr 1978 | A |
4621749 | Kanfer | Nov 1986 | A |
4673109 | Cassia | Jun 1987 | A |
4921150 | Lagergren et al. | May 1990 | A |
4978036 | Burd | Dec 1990 | A |
5033657 | Whittington | Jul 1991 | A |
5156293 | Petterson et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5373970 | Ophardt | Dec 1994 | A |
5377871 | Banks et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5431309 | Ophardt | Jul 1995 | A |
5443236 | Bell et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445288 | Banks | Aug 1995 | A |
5465877 | Bell et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5492247 | Shu et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5836482 | Ophardt et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5992698 | Copeland et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6036056 | Lee et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6082586 | Banks | Jul 2000 | A |
6189740 | Wade et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209752 | Mitchell et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6347724 | Chen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6516976 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6607103 | Gerenraich et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6619512 | Sayers et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6701573 | Ciavarella et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707873 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6772328 | Talbot et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6877642 | Maddox et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7028861 | Sayers et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7044328 | Ciavarella | May 2006 | B1 |
7066356 | Schuman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7084592 | Rodrian | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7232045 | Ophardt et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7247140 | Ophardt | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7278554 | Armstrong | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7296765 | Rodrian | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7367477 | Ophardt et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7530477 | Ophardt | May 2009 | B2 |
7540397 | Muderlak et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7568598 | Ophardt et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7611030 | Reynolds et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637391 | Rosenkranz et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7748574 | Ophardt et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765916 | Ophardt et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7798370 | Ciavarella et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7798371 | Ophardt | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7896196 | Wegelin et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909209 | Reynolds et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7980777 | Kennedy et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992804 | Nauels | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8245881 | Ophardt | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8251409 | Chang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8657160 | Lashells et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8851331 | Pelkey et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20020074355 | Lewis | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020074356 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030141318 | Sorensen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040232168 | Ciavarella et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050064281 | Ophardt | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072808 | Kitamura | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050263545 | Ophardt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050284888 | Rhodenbaugh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060032871 | Ophardt et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041197 | Ophardt | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060175353 | Ophardt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060213929 | Ophardt et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070000941 | Hadden et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070158359 | Rodrian | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169576 | Ophardt et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070257058 | Ophardt et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080121659 | Ophardt | May 2008 | A1 |
20080185399 | Yang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080283556 | Snodgrass | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090045221 | Ophardt et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090101671 | Cittadino et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120950 | Titas et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090184137 | O'Brien | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204256 | Wegelin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090266842 | Snodgrass | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090302061 | Ophardt | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090302067 | Hendrickx et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090308887 | Woo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012679 | Brownlee | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100059550 | Ciavarella et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100072227 | Cittadino et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100140297 | Ophardt et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100147890 | Ciavarella | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163580 | Ophardt et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100206909 | O'Brien | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100237096 | Wegelin | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252568 | Ciavarella et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100288788 | Ophardt | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100308076 | Snodgrass | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100320227 | Reynolds | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110011890 | Rosenkranz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110017778 | Kadiks et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110056987 | Proper et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062182 | Reynolds | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101032 | Hsu | May 2011 | A1 |
20120006848 | Reynolds | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120080452 | Boshuizen et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130292417 | Pelkey et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140231459 | Pelkey | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231460 | Pelkey et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0176135 | Apr 1986 | EP |
1454576 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1280448 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2005871 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2223642 | Sep 2010 | EP |
3019811 | Jan 1996 | JP |
2000023871 | Jan 2000 | JP |
9420407 | Sep 1994 | WO |
0249490 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2004086731 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2008006209 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2011077111 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of counterpart international application No. PCT/US2014/015498, dated Jun. 13, 2014, 12 pp. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,110, dated May 27, 2014 through Nov. 26, 2014, 44 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150164285 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13768110 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 14630790 | US |