All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The invention generally relates to an apparatus for controlling the dispensing of fluids, and in particular, a dispensing control for fluid being provided to a distal end of a surgical scope, such as, a laparoscope, in order to maintain and improve visualization.
Minimally invasive surgical procedures utilizing surgical scopes are desirable because they often provide one or more of the following advantages: reduced blood loss, reduced post-operative patient discomfort, shortened recovery and hospitalization time, smaller incisions, and reduced exposure of internal organs to possible contaminants.
Generally, minimally invasive surgeries utilize scopes, such as laparoscopes, that permit remote visualization of a surgical site within a patient's body while the surgical procedure is being performed. During a laparoscopic procedure, the patient's abdominal or pelvic cavity is accessed through two or more relatively small incisions rather than through a single large incision that is typical in a conventional surgery. Surgical scopes, such as laparoscopes, usually consist in part of a rigid or relatively rigid rod or shaft having an objective lens at one end and an eyepiece and/or integrated visual display at the other. The scope may also be connected to a remote visual display device or a video camera to record surgical procedures.
In laparoscopic surgeries, the abdomen is typically inflated with a gas through the use of an insufflator, to distend the abdominal space by elevating the abdominal wall above the internal organs and thereby create a sufficient working and viewing space for the surgeon. Carbon dioxide is usually used for insufflation, though other suitable gases may also be used. Conventional insufflators are adapted to cycle on and off to maintain a preset and suitable pressure within the patient's body cavity.
The local environment within a patient's abdominal space is generally rather warm and humid, and the use of devices such as harmonic scalpels and other cutting and coagulating devices generate mist, smoke, and other debris that is released into the surgical field and often becomes suspended throughout the expanded abdominal space. Additionally, blood, bodily fluids, pieces of tissue, fat or other bodily material may come in contact with or even attach to the lens. As a result of these conditions, visualization through the scope can be significantly diminished. Typically, the only solution to fogging and debris collection on the lens is removal of the scope from the body cavity and defogging or cleaning the lens by wiping it with a cloth, warming the scope tip, or utilizing another defogging method. The need to remove the scope to defog and remove debris from the lens is inconvenient for the scope operator and the surgeon and can interrupt and undesirably prolong surgical procedures.
As such, some devices have been developed to assist in the improvement of visualization. These devices may provide gas or liquid fluids to the distal end in order to clear the lens area. The cleaning of a laparoscopic lens during a medical procedure, however, requires the ability to control the volume and placement of the fluid. Unplanned and uncontrolled releases of fluid during the procedure, usually small droplets that form drips, are a major visual distraction to the user because they can distort the image either by sliding over the lens or by forming bubbles over the lens.
One approach to preventing drips is to remove the fluid and dry the conduit by pressurized gas or by applying a vacuum to retract fluid from the conduit. In doing so, however, all the fluid must be removed from the conduit. This is difficult to accomplish at a high level of reliability because of fluid surface tension and the high positive pressure or low negative pressure required to absolutely evacuate the conduit.
As such, there remains a need for fluid dispensing control mechanism for cleaning the lens of a laparoscope in situ that prevents the uncontrolled dispensing of the fluid.
The present disclosure is directed towards a view optimizing assembly for use with a laparoscope that facilitates intra-operative defogging, surgical debris deflection, and cleaning of a laparoscope lens during minimally invasive surgery, and furthermore, controls the dispensing of fluid from the device. The fluid control mechanism is directed towards a one-way valve mechanism and may further include syringe system to release fluid pressure in the fluid passageway.
In general, in one embodiment, a view optimizing assembly for use in combination with a laparoscope includes a sheath configured to be mounted over a shaft of a laparoscope. The sheath includes at least one lumen extending within a wall of the sheath from a proximal end of the sheath to a distal end of the sheath, and the at least one lumen is configured to hold a fluid therein. The sheath further includes a valve at a distal end of the at least one lumen. The valve is configured to prevent release of fluid from the at least one lumen when closed and to allow the release of fluid from the at least one lumen when open.
This and other embodiments can include one or more of the following features. The valve can be an elastomeric valve. The valve can be configured to open to allow the release of fluid when a predetermined minimum pressure is placed on the valve by the fluid within the at least one lumen. The predetermined minimum pressure can be approximately 20 mmHg. The valve can be configured to close when a pressure below a predetermined maximum pressure is placed on the valve by the fluid. The predetermined maximum pressure can be approximately 15 mmHg. The view optimizing assembly can further include a syringe mating mechanism fluidically connected to the at least one lumen. The syringe mating mechanism can include a gasket at a distal end thereof and can be configured such that, when a syringe is placed within the syringe mating mechanism and a predetermined pressure or given user pressure is placed on a plunger of the syringe, a distal end of the syringe seats within the gasket to allow fluid to flow into the at least one lumen. When the predetermined pressure or given user pressure is released from the plunger of the syringe, the gasket can be configured to act as a spring to push the syringe proximally. Removing pressure from a plunger of the syringe can immediately cause the valve to close. The gasket can be configured to seal the syringe within the syringe mating mechanism when the distal end of the syringe seats within the gasket. The gasket can be an elastomeric gasket. At least one additional lumen of the plurality of lumens can be configured to convey gas from the proximal end of the sheath to the distal end of the sheath. The valve can be a one-way valve.
In general, in one embodiment, a method of clearing debris from the lens of a laparoscope during a laparoscopic procedure includes: (1) passing fluid through a lumen of a sheath mounted over a shaft of a laparoscope; and (2) opening a valve to allow the fluid to flow over a lens of the laparoscope when a pressure in the lumen has reached a predetermined minimum amount.
This and other embodiments can include one or more of the following features. The predetermined minimum pressure can be approximately 20 mmHg. The method can further include closing the valve when a pressure in the lumen goes below a predetermined maximum pressure. The predetermined maximum pressure can be approximately 15 mmHg. Passing fluid can include ejecting fluid from a syringe into the lumen. The method can further include seating the syringe in a syringe mating mechanism to allow for the ejection of fluid. Seating the syringe in a syringe mating mechanism can include sealing the syringe against the syringe mating mechanism. Fluid from the syringe can pass into the lumen when the syringe is sealed in the syringe mating mechanism. The method can further include removing pressure from the plunger to stop the ejection of fluid and immediately cause the valve to close. The method can further include passing gas through an additional lumen of the sheath to allow the gas to flow over the lens of the laparoscope. The fluid can be a surfactant cleaning fluid, and allowing the fluid to flow over the lens can clean the lens.
In general, in one embodiment, a view optimizing assembly for use in combination with a laparoscope includes a sheath configured to be mounted over shaft of a laparoscope. The sheath includes a lumen extending from a proximal end of the sheath to a distal end of the sheath. The lumen is configured to hold a fluid therein, and a syringe mating mechanism is fluidically connected to the lumen. The syringe mating mechanism includes a gasket at a distal end thereof such that, when a syringe is placed within the dispenser and a predetermined pressure or given user pressure is placed on a plunger of the syringe, a distal end of the syringe seats within the gasket to allow fluid to flow into the lumen.
This and other embodiments can include one or more of the following features. When the predetermined pressure or given user pressure is released from the plunger of the syringe, the gasket can be configured to act as a spring to push the syringe proximally. The gasket can be configured to seal the syringe within the syringe mating mechanism when the distal end of the syringe seats within the gasket. The gasket can be an elastomeric gasket.
In general, in one embodiment, a method of clearing debris from the lens of a laparoscope during a laparoscopic procedure includes: (1) applying pressure to a fluid within a lumen of a sheath mounted over a shaft of a laparoscope; (2) opening a valve positioned in the lumen when the pressure in the lumen has reached a predetermined level; (3) stopping the applying pressure step and relieving the pressure on the fluid in the lumen; (4) venting a fluid column in communication with the fluid to atmospheric pressure; and (5) closing the valve when the relieving step has reduced the pressure in the conduit below a predetermined level.
In general, in one embodiment, a view optimizing assembly for use in combination with a laparoscope includes a sheath configured to be mounted over shaft of a laparoscope. The sheath includes a lumen extending from a proximal end of the sheath to a distal end of the sheath, and the lumen is configured to hold a fluid therein. A syringe mating mechanism is fluidically connected with the lumen through a distal opening and includes a gasket therein. A syringe includes a syringe barrel and a plunger, and the syringe barrel is configured to fit within the syringe mating mechanism. The gasket is configured to sit between the distal end of the syringe the distal opening such that, when the syringe is placed within the syringe mating mechanism, there remains some relative movement of the syringe relative to the syringe mating mechanism until a predetermined pressure or given user pressure is placed on the plunger such that the distal end of the syringe seats against the gasket, forming a fluid channel with the lumen.
Any of these embodiments can include one or more of the following features. The valve can be an orifice valve including a plug and an orifice. The orifice can be a slit. The orifice can be a tortuous path hole. The orifice can have a width or diameter of less than 0.02″. The orifice can be substantially centered in the orifice plug. The orifice plug can include a central portion bordered by two side portions. The central portion can include the orifice and have a shorter length than the side portions. The side portions can include rounded edges configured to direct flow into the orifice. The orifice can be less than 1.6 mm long. The valve can include a material having a durometer of 10-40 shoreA. The predetermined minimum pressure can be at least 1 psi. The predetermined minimum pressure can be about 2 psi. The valve can be made of silicone or polyurethane. The fluid can be docusate sodium with a w/v of 0.05% to 0.25%. The valve can close when the pressure is less than 0 psi. The valve can be a duckbill, poppet, umbrella, or flap valve. The syringe dispenser can be transparent or translucent. The syringe dispenser can include grooves an inner diameter thereof running from the gasket to a proximal end of the syringe. Seating the syringe in the syringe mating mechanism can cause the predetermined minimum pressure to be applied immediately. The valve can be at the distal-most end of the lumen. The method can further include introducing relative motion between the syringe and the syringe mating mechanism to cause the fluid to pass through the valve. The relative motion can set the distal end of the syringe into sealing relation with an outlet of the syringe mechanism. Releasing pressure applied to a plunger of the syringe can permit relative motion between the syringe and the syringe mating mechanism.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
Described herein is a laparoscopic sheath including a lumen for cleaning fluid and a valve configured to control the release of fluid from the lumen. The valve can advantageously retain the fluid in the lumen until sufficient pressure is applied to open the valve and dispense the fluid. The valve can be at the distal end of the lumen and can be configured to self-close when the dispensing pressure is relieved. Also described herein is a fluid delivery system configured to transfer fluid from a user-actuated syringe to the distal end of a surgical instrument, such as a laparoscope. The fluid delivery system can include a line-pressure relief system that, in conjunction with the valve, prevents secondary drips of fluid from leaving the lumen and, for example, depositing on the lens of a laparoscope.
Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention which may be embodied in other specific structures. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
The sheath 14 is designed so that it can be mounted over the shaft of a laparoscope used during a minimally invasive surgical procedure. The sheath 14 generally comprises a shaft for receiving the laparoscope. The shaft of the sheath 14 can be sized and configured to match the size and configuration of the corresponding laparoscope. The laparoscope, and thus the distal end of the sheath 14, may have a blunt tip end or an angled tip end. The sheath 14 is preferably sized and configured to not interfere with the normal use, set-up, and features of the laparoscope in the operating room.
As shown in
Referring to
The delivery tube 16 can connect the fluid source 32 to the sheath 40 to allow fluid to be delivered from the syringe 30 to the sheath 14. The delivery tube 16 can be made, for example, of a flexible medical grade tubing. Other tubes may be provided for the delivery or removal of gas to/from the sheath 14 or removal of fluid from the sheath 14.
As shown in
The valve 42 can be made of a flexible material, such as a material having a hardness of between 10 and 40 shoreA. Further, the valve 42 can be shaped so as to conform to the inner dimensions of the distal end of the lumen 40. The valve 42 can be made of a gamma stable materials, such as silicone or polyurethane, and can have adhesive properties that allow it to bond to a substrate up to pressures of 80 psi. Further, the valve 42 can be configured to self-open when a predetermined minimum pressure is applied and to self-close when a predetermined maximum pressure is applied. In some embodiment, the predetermined minimum pressure is at least 1 psi, such as at least 2 psi, while the predetermined maximum pressure is less than or equal to 0 psi. In other embodiments, the predetermined minimum pressure is 20 mmHg while the predetermined maximum pressure is 15 mmHg.
Referring to
Referring to
As shown in
Referring to
The valve 42 can be configured to hold a column of fluid within the lumen 40 without opening. The fluid can thus remain in the lumen 40 between cleanings of the lens 13. As a result, when pressure is applied to the plunger of the syringe and fluid is ejected through the syringe, the fluid can immediately (i.e. with substantially no delay) exit the lumen 40 to flow over the lens 13. Further, in some embodiments, gas on a distal side of the valve 42, such as gas from the additional lumen(s) and gas within the patient's abdomen in use, can created a pressurized area on a distal side of the valve (i.e. a higher pressure than on the proximal side of the valve when the lumen 40 is open to the atmosphere). This difference in pressure can help keep fluid in the lumen 40 from weeping out. Finally, the valve 42 can be configured to withstand low pressure that may occur on the distal side of the valve 42 due to formation of a vortex of air from gas flowing through the additional lumen(s) 41.
In this way, fluid, such as surfactant cleaning fluid, is dispensed when the fluid source 30 is “on,” wherein fluid is being provided through lumen 40, such as when syringe 30 plunger is depressed and the valve 42 is open. In contrast, fluid is not dispensed when the fluid source 30 is “off,” wherein the syringe plunger is released and the one-way valve closes. The valve 42 and/or the syringe mating mechanism 31 thus prevent the uncontrolled dispensing of cleaning fluid by occluding the distal end of the lumen and isolating the lumen from gas flow through other lumens 41, advantageously avoiding the formation of bubbles and improving visualization through the lens 13 of the laparoscope.
Thus, the fluid dispensing control assembly 10 can be useful while performing intra-operative defogging, surgical debris deflection, and cleaning of a laparoscope lens during minimally invasive surgery without removing the laparoscope from the patient.
The foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/783,847, titled “Fluid Dispensing Control,” and filed Mar. 14, 2013, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/026511 | 3/13/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/151824 | 9/25/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3373736 | Fiore et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
D230727 | Richman | Mar 1974 | S |
4207874 | Choy | Jun 1980 | A |
4279246 | Chikama | Jul 1981 | A |
4281646 | Kinoshita | Aug 1981 | A |
4436087 | Ouchi | Mar 1984 | A |
D277408 | Kubokawa et al. | Jan 1985 | S |
D277505 | Kubokawa et al. | Feb 1985 | S |
4497550 | Ouchi et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4537209 | Sasa | Aug 1985 | A |
D280929 | Lystager | Oct 1985 | S |
4548197 | Kinoshita | Oct 1985 | A |
4552130 | Kinoshita | Nov 1985 | A |
D284028 | Seager | May 1986 | S |
4598698 | Siegmund | Jul 1986 | A |
4616169 | Proffitt | Oct 1986 | A |
4617013 | Betz | Oct 1986 | A |
4633855 | Baba | Jan 1987 | A |
4637814 | Leiboff | Jan 1987 | A |
4646722 | Silverstein et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4735603 | Goodson et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4741326 | Sidall et al. | May 1988 | A |
4748970 | Nakajima | Jun 1988 | A |
4760838 | Fukuda | Aug 1988 | A |
4773413 | Hussein et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4794911 | Okada | Jan 1989 | A |
4800869 | Nakajima | Jan 1989 | A |
4877016 | Kantor et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4941872 | Felix et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4973321 | Michelson | Nov 1990 | A |
4991565 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4998527 | Meyer | Mar 1991 | A |
5009655 | Daignault, Jr. et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5019054 | Clement et al. | May 1991 | A |
5027791 | Takahashi | Jul 1991 | A |
5050585 | Takahashi | Sep 1991 | A |
5133336 | Savitt et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5144942 | Decarie et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5147292 | Kullas et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5163927 | Woker et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167220 | Brown | Dec 1992 | A |
5201908 | Jones | Apr 1993 | A |
5207213 | Auhll et al. | May 1993 | A |
5225001 | Manni et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5279549 | Ranford | Jan 1994 | A |
D346023 | Stewart, Sr. | Apr 1994 | S |
5306272 | Cohen et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312400 | Bales et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313934 | Wiita et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320091 | Grossi et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5322070 | Goodman et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328458 | Sekino et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336170 | Salerno et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339800 | Wiita et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5359991 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364407 | Poll | Nov 1994 | A |
5386817 | Jones | Feb 1995 | A |
5392766 | Masterson et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5400767 | Murdoch | Mar 1995 | A |
5448891 | Nakagiri et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5448990 | De Faria Correa | Sep 1995 | A |
5464008 | Kim | Nov 1995 | A |
5468240 | Gentelia et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
D369862 | Stewart, Jr. | May 1996 | S |
5514074 | Yabe et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514084 | Fisher | May 1996 | A |
5518502 | Kaplan et al. | May 1996 | A |
5562600 | Matsuno | Oct 1996 | A |
5563737 | Kamrat | Oct 1996 | A |
5569157 | Nakazawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575753 | Yabe et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575756 | Karasawa et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5605532 | Schermerhorn | Feb 1997 | A |
5630795 | Kuramoto et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637075 | Kikawada | Jun 1997 | A |
5647840 | D'Amelio et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5697888 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5722933 | Yabe | Mar 1998 | A |
5746695 | Yasui et al. | May 1998 | A |
5788628 | Matsuno et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5857961 | Vanden Hoek et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863286 | Yabe et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865730 | Fox et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868663 | Katsurada et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5869107 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5894369 | Akiba et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5922105 | Fujii et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5954637 | Francis | Sep 1999 | A |
5957888 | Hinchliffe | Sep 1999 | A |
5989183 | Reisdorf et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6017333 | Bailey | Jan 2000 | A |
6040053 | Scholz et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6071606 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
D428487 | Renner et al. | Jul 2000 | S |
6096026 | Schultz | Aug 2000 | A |
6110103 | Donofrio | Aug 2000 | A |
6110259 | Schultz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113586 | Ouchi | Sep 2000 | A |
6117070 | Akiba | Sep 2000 | A |
6126592 | Proch et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149659 | Ahmed | Nov 2000 | A |
6156409 | Doushita et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176825 | Chin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6206825 | Tsuyuki | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234635 | Seitzinger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6282442 | DeStefano et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293909 | Chu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299592 | Zander | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306932 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309347 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6354992 | Kato | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361492 | Santilli | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383134 | Santilli | May 2002 | B1 |
6409657 | Kawano | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425535 | Akiba | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6447446 | Smith et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6582357 | Ouchi et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589316 | Schultz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
D481126 | Hayamizu | Oct 2003 | S |
6645197 | Garrison et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
D484594 | Hayamizu | Dec 2003 | S |
D486910 | Hayamizu et al. | Feb 2004 | S |
6695772 | Bon et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699185 | Gminder et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712479 | Seitzinger et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712757 | Becker et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712759 | Muller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6752755 | Akiba | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755782 | Ogawa | Jun 2004 | B2 |
D493529 | Hayamizu et al. | Jul 2004 | S |
6764445 | Ramans et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6780516 | Chen | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783845 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
D498846 | Hayamizu et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
6814697 | Ouchi | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6857436 | Labib et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858005 | Ohline et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6882236 | Dinn et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889400 | Kawazoe et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6921362 | Ouchi | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921380 | Epstein et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6977053 | Mukasa et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984204 | Akiba | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989183 | McKillip | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7074180 | Bertolero et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080641 | Gomez | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087013 | Belson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7150713 | Shener et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
D534655 | Iranyi et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
D535743 | Williams | Jan 2007 | S |
7169167 | Chu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7198599 | Goto et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223231 | Akiba | May 2007 | B2 |
7250028 | Julian et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7270670 | Yencho | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7341556 | Shalman | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D573711 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2008 | S |
7413543 | Banik et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7435218 | Krattiger et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
D600807 | Dienst et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
D613403 | Poll et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
7803109 | Gomez | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7803144 | Vollrath | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7927271 | Dimitriou et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8047215 | Sasaki | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8062214 | Shener et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075481 | Park et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8096944 | Harrel | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8226549 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8419624 | James et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8517921 | Tremaglio et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8545395 | Akahoshi et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8888689 | Poll et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9050036 | Poll et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9050037 | Poll et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9078562 | Poll et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20010011162 | Epstein | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020022762 | Beane et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020058858 | Ogura et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072652 | Berci et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091304 | Ogura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020193806 | Moenning et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030200738 | Booth | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040034339 | Stoller et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059363 | Alvarez et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082915 | Kadan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040204671 | Stubbs et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216468 | Hatcher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050043683 | Ravo | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059981 | Poll | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065405 | Hasegawa | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080342 | Gilreath et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113797 | Ott et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119528 | Weinberg | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137529 | Mantell | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154355 | Gross et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159765 | Moutafis et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171467 | Landman | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171528 | Sartor et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203342 | Kucklick et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234301 | Gomez | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261553 | Swain et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060020165 | Adams | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041186 | Vancaillie | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047184 | Banik et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052661 | Gannot et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069306 | Banik et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060252993 | Freed et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270910 | Davis | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070088275 | Stearns et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070179432 | Bar et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182842 | Sonnenschein et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203474 | Ryan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070282253 | Sasaki | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070289449 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299310 | Phillips | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080021277 | Stefanchik et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051631 | Dejima et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058591 | Saadat et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081948 | Weisenburgh et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082084 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086704 | Aravamudan | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108871 | Mohr | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161646 | Gomez | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188715 | Fujimoto | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200765 | Mondschein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208128 | Guo et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080249362 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255419 | Kendale et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255424 | Durgin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090018602 | Mitelberg et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090113644 | Heck | May 2009 | A1 |
20090215018 | Edmondson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234193 | Weisenburgh et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253962 | Fernandez et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090253964 | Miyamoto | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090253965 | Miyamoto | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100010310 | Weisenburgh, II | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100331856 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120022331 | Poll et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120101337 | Clark et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120184897 | Poll | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197084 | Drach et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120310147 | Poll et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120316394 | Yoshida | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130131580 | Blackhurst et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130172670 | Levy et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130217970 | Weisenburgh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130231606 | Stearns et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130317295 | Morse | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140069461 | Gomez et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140107558 | Gomez et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114128 | Wills | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140215736 | Gomez et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140371763 | Poll et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150005582 | Poll et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150038785 | Govrin et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150265138 | Poll et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160089006 | Poll et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20180000324 | Poll et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0664101 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0790652 | Aug 1997 | EP |
1188415 | Mar 2002 | EP |
59-203534 | Nov 1984 | JP |
61-168328 | Jul 1986 | JP |
05-103756 | Apr 1993 | JP |
05-199979 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H07-275185 | Oct 1995 | JP |
09-135804 | May 1997 | JP |
2000-225093 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2004-267583 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-110978 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2009-240596 | Oct 2009 | JP |
WO9210969 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO9222238 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO2005002210 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005009227 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2005115221 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006014814 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2008030256 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO2008077080 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO2008128142 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2008130582 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009073577 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2010042913 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010042915 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2011041387 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO2011044448 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO2011130399 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2012005819 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012044410 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012122263 | Sep 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Poll et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/385,693 entitled “Devices, systems, and methods for performing endoscopic surgical procedures,” filed Dec. 20, 2016. |
Drach et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/970,296 entitled “Systems and methods for optimizing and maintaining visualization of a surgical field during the use of surgical scopes,” filed Dec. 15, 2015. |
Poll et al.; Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/329,224 entitled “Manifold Coupling,” filed Dec. 10, 2008 (now abandoned). |
Poll et al.; Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/329,225 entitled “Sheath Manifold for Maintaining Surgical Scope Visualization,” filed Dec. 10, 2008 (now abandoned). |
Poll et al.; Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/329,221 entitled “Handle for Maintaining Surgical Scope Visualization,” filed Dec. 10, 2008 (now abandoned). |
Poll et al.; Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/335,699 entitled “Surgical Scope Stabilizer,” filed Apr. 20, 2009 (now abandoned). |
Poll et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/733,752 entitled “View optimizer and stabilizer for use with surgical scopes,” filed Jun. 8, 2015. |
Farley et al.; Double-blind, prospective, randomized study of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide for patients undergoing lararoscopic cholecystectomy; Arch Surg; 139; pp. 739-744; Jul. 2004. |
Hashimoto et al.; Development of a fogless scope and its analysis using infrared radiation pyrometer; Surg Endosc; 11(8); pp. 805-808; Aug. 1997. |
Lawrentschuk et al.; Laparoscopic lens fogging: A review of etiology and methods to maintain a clear visual field; Journal of Endourology; 24(6); pp. 905-913; Jun. 2010. |
Ohdaira et al.; Antifogging effects of a socket-type device with the superhydrophilic, titanium dioxide coated glass for laparoscope; Surg endosc; 21(2); pp. 333-338; Dec. 2007. |
Ott, Douglas E.; Chapter 1. Pneumoperitoneum: Production, management, effects and consequences; in Prevention & Management of Laparoendoscopic Surgical Complications, 1st Ed.; 6 pgs.; Jan. 1999 (retrieved from: http://laparoscopy.blogs.com/prevention_management/2006/02/chapter_1_pneum.html on Oct. 7, 2013). |
Stern; Landmark strides in laparoscopic technologies: Video to robotics; General Surgery News; 40; Oct. 2013 (retrieved from http://www.generalsurgerynews.com/ViewArticle.aspx?d=In+the+News&_id=69&i=October+2013&i_jd=999&a_id=24140 on Jun. 6, 2014). |
Olympus Medical Systems Corp.; Lens Cleaning Sheath (product brochure); R0153E2; 2 pgs.; Jan. 2014. |
Poll et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/566,503 entitled “Endoscope having integrated visual field enhancement system,” filed Oct. 13, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150374212 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61783847 | Mar 2013 | US |