1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to fluid-fluid contacting trays and, more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to an improved fluid impingement device and tray assembly incorporating fluid-deflector surfaces with multiple fluid-flow apertures for higher efficiency operation, which, in one embodiment, includes gas-liquid contacting trays incorporating fixed or floating valves with multiple vapor apertures.
2. History of Related Art
Distillation columns are utilized to separate selected components from a multicomponent stream. Generally, such contact columns utilize either trays, packing, or combinations thereof. In certain years the trend has been to replace so-called “bubble caps” by sieve and valve trays in most tray column designs.
Successful fractionation in the column is dependent upon intimate contact between heavier fluids and lighter fluids. Some contact devices, such as trays, are characterized by relatively high pressure drop and relatively high fluid hold-up. One type of contact apparatus utilizes fluid in the vapor phase to contact fluid in the liquid phase and has become popular for certain applications. Another type of contact apparatus is high-efficiency packing, which is energy efficient because it has low pressure drop and low fluid hold-up. However, these very properties at times make columns equipped with structured packing difficult to operate in a stable, consistent manner. Moreover, many applications simply require the use of trays.
Fractionation column trays come in two configurations: cross-flow and counter flow. The trays generally consist of a solid tray or deck having a plurality of apertures and are installed on support rings within the column. In cross-flow trays, lighter fluid ascends through the apertures and contacts heavier fluid moving across the tray, through the “active” area thereof. In this area, the heavier fluid and the lighter fluid mix and fractionation occurs. The heavier fluid is directed onto the tray by means of a vertical channel from the tray above. This channel is referred to as the Inlet Downcomer. The heavier fluid moves across the tray and exits through a similar channel referred to as the Exit Downcomer. The location of the downcomers determines the flow pattern of the heavier fluid. If there are two let Downcomers and the heavier fluid is split into two streams over each tray, it is called a two pass tray. If there is only one Inlet and one Outlet Downcomer on opposite sides of the tray, it is called a single pass tray. For two or more passes, the tray is often referred to as a Multipass Tray. The number of passes generally increases as the required (design) flow rate increases. It is the active area of the tray, however, which is of critical concern.
Addressing now select flow designs, a particularly effective tray in process columns is the sieve tray. This tray is constructed with a large number of apertures formed in the bottom surface. The apertures permit the ascending lighter fluid to flow into direct engagement with the heavier fluid that is flowing across the tray from the downcomer described above. When there is sufficient lighter-fluid flow upwardly through the tray, the heavier fluid is prevented from running downwardly through the apertures (referred to as “weeping”). A small degree of weeping is normal in trays while a larger degree of weeping is detrimental to the capacity and efficiency of a tray.
Tray efficiency is also known to be improved in sieve type trays by increasing the froth height of the heavier fluid and reducing the backflow of the heavier fluid flowing across the tray. Froth is created when lighter fluid “bubbles” percolate upwardly through the heavier fluid flowing across the tray. The suspension of the lighter fluid in the heavier fluid prolongs the fluid-fluid contact which enhances the efficiency of the process. The longer the froth is maintained and the higher the froth is established, the greater the fluid-fluid retention. Higher froth requires smaller “bubbles” formed at a sufficiently slow rate. Likewise, backflow occurs beneath the froth when circulating currents of heavier fluid are established during the heavier fluid flow across the plate. This generally forms along the lateral portions thereof. These currents carry the heavier fluid back across the tray in a manner that reduces the concentration-difference driving force for mass transfer. It is the concentration-difference between the lighter fluid and the heavier fluid which enhances the effectiveness of the fluid-fluid contact.
The concentration-difference between the lighter fluid and the heavier fluid can be effected in many ways; some reducing efficiency. For example, as operating pressure increases, the heavier fluid begins to absorb lighter fluid as it moves across a tray. This is above that normally dissolved in the heavier fluid and represents much larger amounts of lighter-fluid bubbles that are comingled or “entrained” with the heavier fluid. This lighter fluid is not firmly held and is released within the downcomer, and, in fact, the majority of said lighter fluid must be released otherwise the downcomer cannot accommodate the heavier fluid/lighter fluid mixture and will flood, thus preventing successful tower operation. This phenomena is generally deemed to occur when operating pressure is such as to produce a lighter fluid density above about 1.0 lbs/cu. ft. and typically amounts to about 10 to 20% of the lighter fluid by volume. For conventional trays, as shown below, the released lighter fluid must oppose the descending frothy lighter fluid/heavier fluid mixture flowing over the weir into the downcomer. In many cases, such opposition leads to poor tower operation and premature flooding.
When a vapor comprises the lighter fluid and a liquid comprises the heavier fluid, there are specific performance issues. Certain performance and design issues are seen in the publication “Distillation Tray Fundamentals”, M. J. Lockett, Cambridge University Press, 1986. Other examples are seen in several prior art patents, which include U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,959,419, 4,604,247 and 4,597,916, each assigned Glitsch, Inc., and U.S. Pat. No. 4,603,022 issued to Mitsubishi Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha of Tokyo, Japan. A particularly relevant reference is seen in U.S. Pat. No. 4,499,035 assigned to Union Carbide Corporation that teaches a gas-liquid contacting tray with improved inlet bubbling means. A cross-flow tray of the type described above is therein shown with improved means for initiating bubble activity at the tray inlet comprising spaced apart, imperforate wall members extending substantially vertically upwardly and transverse to the liquid flow path. The structural configuration is said to promote activity over a larger tray surface than that afforded by simple perforated tray assemblies. This is accomplished in part by providing a raised region adjacent the downcomer area for facilitating gas ascension therethrough.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,550,000 assigned to Shell Oil Company teaches an apparatus for contacting a liquid with a gas in a relationship between vertically stacked trays in a tower. The apertures in a given tray are provided for the passage of gas in a manner less hampered by liquid coming from a discharge means of the next upper tray. This is provided by perforated housings secured to the tray deck beneath the downcomers for breaking up the descending liquid flow. Such advances in tray designs improve efficiency within the confines of prior art structures. Likewise, U.S. Pat. No. 4,543,219 assigned to Nippon Kayaku Kabushiki Kaisha of Tokyo, Japan teaches a baffle-tray tower. The operational parameters of high gas-liquid contact efficiency and the need for low pressure loss are set forth. Such references are useful in illustrating the need for high efficiency lighter fluid/heavier fluid contact in tray process towers. U.S. Pat. No. 4,504,426 issued to Karl T. Chuang et. al. and assigned to Atomic Energy of Canada Limited is yet another example of gas-liquid contacting apparatus.
Several prior patents have specifically addressed the tray design and the apertures in the active tray deck area itself. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,146,280 is a 1964 patent teaching a directional float valve. The gas is induced to discharge from the inclined valve in a predefined direction depending on the orientation of the valve in the tray deck. Such valve configurations are often designed for particular applications and flow characteristics. Tray valves with weighted sides and various shapes have thus found widespread acceptance in the prior art. A circular valve structure is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,287,004 while a rectangular valve structure is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,951,691. Both of these patents issuing to I. E. Nutter, teach specific aspects of gas-liquid contact flow utilizing tray valve systems. Such specialized designs are necessary because lighter fluid/heavier fluid flow problems must be considered for each application in which a tray is fed by a downcomer. The type of flow valve, its orientation, and the lighter-fluid flow apertures for lighter fluid-heavier fluid flow interaction are some of the issues addressed by the present invention.
Addressing specifically now the type of flow valve, its orientation, and the lighter-fluid flow apertures that currently are taught by the prior art. Attention is directed to two patents in which one of the co-inventors of the present application, Michael J. Binkley, is a co-inventor. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,147,584 and 5,120,474, both teach certain valve-tray designs and contact tray assemblies and methods. In the contact tray assemblies and the valve designs, it may be seen that the individual valves whether fixed or floating, are illustrated in the drawings with solid surfaces. In other words, both the front and rear legs, as well as the top surface of the valves, whether floating or fixed, are shown to be of solid construction. Other contact-tray valve assemblies are set forth and shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,145,816; 5,911,922; 5,762,834; and 6,089,550. Each of these patents further illustrate aspects of contact tray assemblies and methods as well as valve designs. Additional patents which should likewise be reviewed relative to contact trays include the following four patents in which the Applicant hereof, Michael J. Binkley, is a co-inventor and include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,453,222; 4,956,127; 5,106,556; 5,277,848; and 5,192,466. The above-referenced patents and statements with regard to the related art are set forth for purposes of understanding the intricacies of the design considerations in contact-tray assembly and method configurations. It would be an advantage to provide a method of and apparatus for enhanced fluid flow manifesting increased efficiency with a valve design having either a fixed or floating configuration relative to the tray and with multiple fluid-flow apertures formed therein for enhanced fluid interaction. The methods of and apparatus for valve tray assemblies and methods are herein set forth and shown.
A tray valve assembly for a process column of a type wherein a first, heavier fluid flows downwardly from a downcomer onto a tray and thereacross in a first direction through which a second, lighter fluid flows upwardly therethrough for interaction and mass transfer with the heavier fluid before passing therefrom. The assembly comprises a plurality of apertures formed on a surface of the tray for facilitating the lighter fluid flow upwardly therethrough, a plurality of valves disposed across the surface of the tray and mounted above the plurality of apertures formed on the surface of the tray, each valve of the plurality of valves comprising a top surface and at least one securement leg, and a first securement leg of the at least one securement leg is adapted to intercept the heavier fluid flow in the first direction forming a diverting baffle for engaging the heavier fluid flow across the tray. Each valve of the plurality of valves comprising at least one aperture to facilitate the lighter fluid flow therefrom and further comprising a first aperture in the first securement leg wherein the first aperture is adapted to allow the lighter fluid to flow in a second direction to interact with the heavier fluid flow in the first direction for lighter fluid aeration thereof. Each valve of the plurality valves comprising a plurality of open side regions for allowing ascending lighter fluid flow to pass outwardly therefrom in generally oppositely dispersed directions for contact with the heavier fluid flow in the first direction and each valve of the plurality of valves is adapted to allow the ascending lighter fluid flow to pass outwardly therefrom generally in the first direction of the heavier fluid flow passing over the top surface for facilitating a propulsion of the heavier fluid flow therefrom and across the tray.
A method of mixing a first, heavier fluid flowing downwardly from a downcomer onto a tray and thereacross in a first direction with a second, lighter fluid flowing upwardly therethrough for interaction and mass transfer with the heavier fluid before passing therefrom. The method includes forming, on a surface of the tray, a plurality of apertures for facilitating the lighter fluid flow upwardly therethrough, disposing, above the plurality of apertures formed on the surface of the tray, a plurality of valves, wherein each valve of the plurality of valves comprising a top surface and at least one securement leg, and intercepting, via a first securement leg of the at least one securement leg, the heavier fluid flow in the first direction to form a diverting baffle for engaging the heavier fluid flow across the tray. The method further includes forming, in each valve of the plurality of valves, a plurality of apertures to facilitate the lighter fluid flow therefrom, wherein a first aperture is formed in the first securement leg, allowing, via the first aperture, the lighter fluid to flow in a second direction to interact with the heavier liquid flow in the first direction for lighter fluid aeration thereof, allowing, via a plurality of open side regions, the ascending lighter fluid flow to pass outwardly therefrom in generally oppositely disposed directions for contact with the heavier fluid flow in the first direction, and allowing, via each valve of the plurality of valves, ascending lighter fluid flow to pass outwardly therefrom generally in the first direction of heavier fluid flow passing over the top surface for facilitating a propulsion of the heavier fluid flow therefrom and across the tray.
A valve for use in a tray valve assembly for a process column of a type wherein a first, heavier fluid flows downwardly from a downcomer onto a tray and thereacross in a first direction through which a second, lighter fluid flows upwardly therethrough for interaction and mass transfer with the heavier fluid before passing therefrom. The valve includes at least one securement leg having a first aperture formed therein, a top surface having a second aperture formed therein, a plurality of open side valve regions, and a first securement leg of the at least one securement leg being adapted to intercept the heavier fluid flow in the first direction forming a diverting baffle for engaging the heavier fluid flow across the tray. The first aperture being adapted to allow the lighter fluid to flow in a second direction to interact with the heavier fluid flow in the first direction for lighter fluid aeration thereof. The plurality of open side valve regions being adapted to allow ascending lighter fluid flow to pass outwardly therefrom in generally oppositely disposed directions for contact with the heavier fluid flow in the first direction. The valve is further adapted to allow the ascending lighter fluid flow to pass outwardly therefrom generally in the first direction of the heavier fluid flow passing over the top surface for facilitating a propulsion of the heavier fluid flow therefrom and across the tray.
A valve for use in a tray valve assembly for a process column of a type wherein a first, heavier fluid flows downwardly from a downcomer onto a tray and thereacross in a first direction through which a second, lighter fluid flows upwardly therethrough for interaction and mass transfer with the heavier fluid before passing therefrom. The valve includes a first securement leg having at least a first aperture formed therein, a second securement leg having at least a second aperture formed therein, a plurality of open side valve regions, the first securement leg being adapted to intercept the heavier fluid flow in the first direction forming a diverting baffle for engaging the heavier fluid flow across the tray. The first aperture being adapted to allow the lighter fluid to flow in a second direction to interact with the heavier fluid flow in the first direction for lighter fluid aeration thereof. The plurality of open side valve regions being adapted to allow the ascending lighter fluid flow to pass outwardly therefrom in generally oppositely disposed directions for contact with the heavier fluid flow in the first direction. The valve is further adapted to allow the ascending lighter fluid flow to pass outwardly therefrom generally in the first direction of the heavier fluid flow for facilitating a propulsion of the heavier fluid flow therefrom and across the tray.
A more complete understanding of the method and system of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following Detailed Description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings wherein:
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings. The invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be constructed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, the embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.
Referring first to
In operation, heavier fluid 13 is fed into the column 10 through reflux return line 34 and side stream feed-input feed line 18. The heavier fluid 13 flows downwardly through the tower 12 and ultimately leaves the tower 12 either at side stream draw-off line 20, or at bottom-stream draw-off line 30. In the case of a vapor-liquid tower, the heavier fluid 13, during its downward flow, is depleted of some material which evaporate from it as it passes through the trays and packing beds, and is enriched or added to by material which condenses into it out of the lighter fluid stream.
Still referring to
Referring still to
According to an exemplary embodiment, cross-flow valve trays 48 and 49 and downcomers 53 and 69 are illustrated. Tray 48 is constructed with a plurality of floating valves. Tray 49 also illustrates a raised inlet section 51 beneath downcomer 53, which is substantially planar, formed with a plurality of apertures, and which may include a series of momentum deflector barriers, as will be described below. The raised inlet area is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,956,127 (the '127 patent). Corrosion is another consideration in designing packed towers and for the selection of the material, design, and the fabrication of the tower internals.
Referring now to
Still referring to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Still referring to
In one embodiment, the plurality of valves 100 are diagrammatically shown as rectangles, but, as will be more fully described below, the plurality of valves 100 can be formed of a plurality of shapes. In one embodiment, the valves 100 are uniformly disposed across the entire surface of tray 49. For example,
Referring now to
The floating valve 100 includes one or more apertures on each surface thereof. In one embodiment, the valve 100 has one aperture on three surfaces forming three distinct apertures therein. Aperture 137C is formed in the top surface 130 thereof while upstream aperture 137D is formed in the front securement leg 132 thereof and downstream aperture 137E is formed in the rear securement leg 134 thereof. These apertures 137C, 137D, 137E in conjunction with the open valve areas 137A and 137B, permit an improved lighter fluid/heavier fluid interaction due to the multiplicity of lighter-fluid flow areas constructed with the valve 100. According to an exemplary embodiment, the size of the valve 100 has been shown to be effective in the assembly of a tray having an active area with approximately 25-50 valves per square foot. Other sizes are, of course, contemplated by the present invention. This valve density per square foot is substantially higher than possible with valves of the conventional size of 11/2″ to 17/8″ in diameter. Prior art valve density on the order of 12-14 valves per square foot has been common. The increased density is a result of the smaller size of valve 100 and its directional thrust design as herein described, which permits it to be spaced close to adjacent valves as shown. The various embodiments of the present invention are a marked advance over prior art designs utilizing larger valves and broader spacing. The efficiency of the tray is thought to be enhanced therefrom.
Still referring to
Referring still to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Similarly,
Referring now to
In summary, this patent application is provided to further teach the utilization of both fixed and floating valves in a contact tray assembly that is designed to enhance lighter fluid/heavier fluid interaction utilizing a multiplicity of valve configurations. The contact trays may have a plurality of valves of a multitude of shapes. The plurality of valves may have one or more apertures in the top and one or more apertures on one or more legs depending from the top surface.
Although various embodiments of the method and apparatus of the present invention have been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions without departing from the spirit of the invention as set forth herein.
This patent application claims priority from, and incorporates by reference the entire disclosure of, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/926,707, filed Apr. 27, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2582826 | Glitsch | Jan 1952 | A |
2718901 | Nutter | Sep 1955 | A |
2752229 | Brown et al. | Jun 1956 | A |
2787453 | Hibshman et al. | Apr 1957 | A |
2853281 | Hibshman et al. | Sep 1958 | A |
2903251 | Thrift | Sep 1959 | A |
2951691 | Nutter | Sep 1960 | A |
3039751 | Versluis | Jun 1962 | A |
3146280 | Forgrieve | Aug 1964 | A |
3233708 | Glitsch | Feb 1966 | A |
3245669 | Huggins et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3282576 | Bruckert et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3287004 | Nutter | Nov 1966 | A |
3338566 | Kittel | Aug 1967 | A |
3399871 | Bon | Sep 1968 | A |
3463464 | Nutter et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3729179 | Keller | Apr 1973 | A |
3759494 | Axelrod et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3959419 | Kitterman | May 1976 | A |
4120919 | McClain | Oct 1978 | A |
4133852 | DiNicolantonio et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4174363 | Bruckert | Nov 1979 | A |
4201626 | Asdigian | May 1980 | A |
4207174 | Christman | Jun 1980 | A |
4247521 | Forte et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4275021 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4374786 | McClain | Feb 1983 | A |
4499035 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4504426 | Chuang et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4519960 | Kitterman et al. | May 1985 | A |
4528068 | Fiocco et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4543219 | Yamato et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4550000 | Bentham | Oct 1985 | A |
4597916 | Chen | Jul 1986 | A |
4603022 | Yoneda et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4604247 | Chen et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4710326 | Seah | Dec 1987 | A |
4729857 | Lee et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4816191 | Berven et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4842778 | Chen et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4855089 | Michels | Aug 1989 | A |
4909967 | Binkley et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4956127 | Binkley et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4981265 | Buhlmann | Jan 1991 | A |
5051214 | Chen et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5098615 | Resetarits | Mar 1992 | A |
5106556 | Binkley et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5120474 | Binkley et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5147584 | Binkley et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5164125 | Binkley et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5192465 | Petrich et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5192466 | Binkley | Mar 1993 | A |
5277848 | Binkley et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5453222 | Lee et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5468425 | Nutter | Nov 1995 | A |
5547617 | Lee et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5573714 | Monkelbaan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5762834 | Hauser et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783119 | Ulrich et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5895608 | Lee et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906773 | Hausch et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911922 | Hauser et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921109 | Billingham et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6053484 | Fan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068244 | Burton et al. | May 2000 | A |
6089550 | Petschauer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113079 | Urbanski et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6145816 | Chuang et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6224043 | Fan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6293526 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6422539 | Burton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6502806 | Richardson | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6540213 | Bachmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6575437 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6588736 | Chuang et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592106 | Eaton, Jr. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6629687 | Gage | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6722639 | Ender et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6739585 | Urbanski et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6799752 | Wu et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6962661 | Northup, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7045103 | McDougald et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7052654 | McDougald et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7078002 | Van Vliet et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7125004 | Dollie et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7235158 | Matsumoto et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7270315 | Burton et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7556734 | Lee et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7712728 | Kehrer | May 2010 | B2 |
7896039 | Bachmann et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8006716 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20020041040 | Fischer et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030067085 | Shakur et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040182013 | Kehrer | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20070126134 | Xu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070295591 | Mosler | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080245651 | Werlen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100288624 | Kim et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120024977 | Buttridge et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120118399 | Binkley et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120211347 | Kim et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120300577 | Buttridge et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/775,895, Kim, SooWoong et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/408,333, Binkley. |
Kister, Henry Z., “Distillation Design”, McGraw-Hill, 1992. |
Glitsch, Inc., “Ballast Tray Design Manuel”, Bulletin 4900, Sixth Edition, 1993, (40 pages). |
Axens IFP Group Technologies, “Equiflow Reactor Internals for Optimal Catalyst Utilization”, Axens Process Licensing, Jun. 2006, 4 pages. |
GTC Technology, “GT-BenZap Technology Licensing”. Engineered to Innovate, 2009, 2 pages. |
Shell, “Shell Global Solutions' Portfolio for Reactor Engineering Technology”, Shell Global Solutions, 2002, 3 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/401,601, Kim SooWoong et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,122, Buttridge, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,245, Binkley, et al. |
Young, Lee W., “International Search Report” for the International Application PCT/IB11/02695 as mailed Apr. 17, 2012. (4 pages). |
Kim, SooWoong et al., “U.S. Appl. No. 13/401,601,” filed Feb. 21, 2012. |
Buttridge, Ian et al., “U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,122,” filed Apr. 17, 2012. |
Binkley, Michael, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/408,333,” Filed Mar. 30, 2009. |
Buttridge, Ian G. “U.S. Appl. No. 12/418,189” filed Apr. 3, 2009. |
Buttridge, Ian G., “U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,881,” filed Aug. 2, 2012. |
Kister, Henry Z., “Distillation Design”, ch. 6, pp. 265, 296, 331, 299-301, ch. 7, pp. 382-394, ch. 9, pp. 537-554, McGraw-Hill, 1992. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080277260 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60926707 | Apr 2007 | US |