The invention relates to a fluid-driven actuator which may be used for assistive, rehabilitation, prosthetic, medical related applications or even industrial applications.
Soft actuators and related actuation systems have been used for assistive, rehabilitation, prosthetic, and manipulation applications. Upon fluid pressurization, the soft actuators are able to produce complex motions, forces and torques with multiple degrees of freedom (DOFs). The soft actuators can be integrated with industrial robotic arms for manipulation applications. Due to their inherent compliance and ability to adapt to the shape of the enclosed objects, the soft actuators can be useful when handling delicate objects or objects with part-to-part variance.
The soft actuators can be further integrated with wearable platforms, such as (but not limited to) soft glove, elbow brace, and belt for wearable applications such as soft wearable robotic exoskeletons, prosthetics, and supernumerary robotic arm or finger. These wearable platforms provide assistance and augmentation of activities of daily living and task-specific rehabilitation for human including healthy people, laborers, elderly, and patients with impaired mobility.
A most common barrier to adoption of assistive devices is user acceptance. End users are primarily concerned with cost, safety and ease of use of the assistive devices. Thus, a challenge is to develop assistive devices such as exoskeletons that are comfortable, affordable and functional. Prior consultation with clinicians has emphasized that the assistive device should not require a steep learning curve and is easy to be put on/taken off. In addition, the assistive devices should be flexible enough so that the assistive devices do not restrict the natural motions of a human joint and produce a wide range of motions.
It is desirable to provide a fluid-driven actuator which addresses at least one of the drawbacks of the prior art and/or to provide the public with a useful choice.
In a first aspect, there is provided a fluid-driven actuator comprising a bending actuator including a first wall portion, a second wall portion cooperating with the first wall portion to define an undulating actuator profile, and an inner fluid bladder disposed between the first and second wall portions and following the undulating actuator profile, and a restraint member arranged to cooperate with the bending actuator to produce a plurality of motions in response to fluid supplied to the inner fluid bladder.
The described embodiments enable the fluid-driven actuator to be customizable and provide natural and compliant actuation. Also, different methods may be used to make the fluid-driven actuator and allows various materials such as fabrics to be used which reduces the weight of the assistive device. With the possibility of using soft and flexible components (soft actuators, soft interfaces) that are cheaper and lighter, when the fluid-driven actuator is incorporated into an assistive device, the device is more comfortable, wearable and affordable than the current devices in the market. Therefore, it has the potential to reduce the risks and barriers to market entry.
In one embodiment, the restraint member may be fixedly coupled to the bending actuator to form a plurality of folds to define the undulating actuator profile.
In another embodiment, the restraint member may be detachably coupled to the bending actuator to form a plurality of folds to define the undulating actuator profile. In such an embodiment, each one of the plurality of folds may form a fold width which is adjustable by a user. The bending actuator may include a plurality of flexion locking mechanisms, and the restraint member may include a plurality of restraint locking mechanisms arranged to be selectively attached to respective ones of the plurality of flexion locking mechanisms.
Preferably, each one of the plurality of folds may be spaced apart from each other. The plurality of folds may include segments of folds spaced apart from each segment. The number of folds within each segment may be different. Alternatively, the number of folds within each segment may be the same. In a specific embodiment, the restraint member may be cylindrical and each segment of folds may be arranged around the restraint member.
Preferably, the fluid-driven actuator may further comprise a secondary bending actuator having an inner secondary fluid bladder. The secondary bending actuator may be arranged in opposing relations with the bending actuator with each fold of the secondary bending actuator in registration with respective folds of the bending actuator. The secondary bending actuator may be arranged above the bending actuator with each fold of the secondary bending actuator in registration with respective folds of the bending actuator.
Advantageously, the inner secondary fluid bladder and the inner fluid bladder may be arranged to be supplied with fluid independently. The secondary fluid bladder may include at least two different segments which are arranged to be supplied with fluid independently.
Preferably, the inner fluid bladder may include at least two different segments which are arranged to be supplied with fluid independently.
The fluid-driven actuator may further comprise a plurality of the bending actuators, and pairs of the bending actuators may be arranged in opposing relations at respective segments of the restraint member, wherein the pair of the bending actuators in one segment is oriented differently from the other pair of bending actuators in another segment. The plurality of bending actuators may further include a further pair of bending actuators next to each other in a further segment. Preferably, the restraint member may include a strain limiting layer for causing the bending actuator to flex in response to fluid supplied to the inner fluid bladder.
Advantageously, the restraint member may include an integrally formed inner straightening fluid bladder, and the inner straightening fluid bladder may be arranged to straighten the restraint member longitudinally in response to fluid supplied to the inner straightening fluid bladder.
The fluid-driven actuator may be made of TPU coated fabric, one or more layers of polymer, or network of fibres. Advantageously, the inner fluid bladder may be integrally formed with the bending actuator.
It is envisaged that the bending actuator may be combined or used with a conventional actuator. For example, the fluid-driven actuator may comprise a bellow-type actuator; and the bending actuator is arranged on the bellow-type actuator.
The fluid-driven actuator has a variety of applications and uses. For example, in further aspects, there is provided an assistive device for rehabilitation or prosthetic applications, a robotic glove or an exoskeleton brace for a limb, comprising at least one fluid-driven actuator as discussed above.
In a further aspect, there is provided a method of producing a fluid-driven actuator according to the above features, comprising integrally forming the bending actuator with the inner fluid bladder. Preferably, the integrally forming may include forming an elongate actuator having the inner fluid bladder by casting or molding; and folding the elongate actuator to form the bending actuator.
The method may further comprise attaching the bending actuator to the restraint member.
In an exemplary embodiment, the method may further comprise 3D printing the bending actuator with the inner fluid bladder.
It is also possible that the method may comprise bonding a TPU-coated fabric to form the inner fluid bladder; and folding the inner fluid bladder to form the bending actuator. In this case, the method may further comprise bonding the bending actuator to the restraint member.
It should be appreciated that features relevant to one aspect may also be relevant to the other aspects.
An exemplary embodiment will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The fluid-driven actuator 100 further includes an inner fluid bladder 202 disposed between the first and second wall portions 201,203. In other words, the inner fluid bladder 202 follows the undulating actuator profile. Since the inner fluid bladder 202 also has the undulating actuator profile of the bending actuator 200, longitudinal axis of the inner fluid bladder 202 also forms the folds 204. In this embodiment, the inner fluid bladder's internal chamber 202 is arranged to be supplied with compressed fluid to expand or inflate the inner fluid bladder 202 and this will be explained further later.
The fluid-driven actuator 100 further includes a restraint member 300 arranged to cooperate with the bending actuator 200. In this embodiment, the restraint member 300 is in the form of a secondary actuator 302 which is generally flat and elongate. The secondary actuator 302 is bonded to the grooves 208 of the bending actuator 200 and includes a secondary inner fluid bladder 304, and
To enable the fluid-driven actuator 100 to produce a plurality of motions, compressed air or pneumatic pressure is supplied to either or both of the inner fluid bladders 202, 304.
Three exemplary manufacturing or fabrication techniques of the fluid-driven actuator 100 would next be described, in particular integral forming of the inner fluid bladders 202,304, and they are:
A. Bonding Process (Using Textiles and Fabrics Through Heat Press and Ultrasonic Welding);
At step 404, the two pieces of TPU coated fabric 450,452 are subject to either mechanical pressure using a heat sealer or by industrial standard ultrasonic welding to seal the edges of the TPU coated fabrics 450,452 to form the air bladder 454a. In other words, after the sealing, an internal air chamber is formed within the air bladder 454a. Steps 402 and 404 are similarly performed to produce a second air bladder 454b as shown in step 406 of
Next, at step 408, the first air bladder 454a is folded to form the bending actuator 200 of
Combining both bending and extension actuators 200,302, the fluid-driven actuator 100 is able to generate flexion and extension torques to support bidirectional movements of the joints (such as fingers, wrist and elbow). When air is injected into the actuators 200,302, the inner fluid bladders 202,304 would inflate, and the outer fabrics that are asymmetrically designed would guide the motions of the actuators 200,302. The fluid-driven actuator 100 developed in this way generate motions without any external bladder (the fabric itself is the bladder), which further reduce the weight and the complexity of the fabrication process.
In the method of
Thus, an alternative sealing method is proposed and this is further elaborated with reference to
Going back to
To test the performance, the fluid-driven actuator 100 of
The bend radius at different pressures was obtained using image analysis software (Image J, National Institute of Health, USA) and normalized to the original length of the actuator.
The maximum blocked tip force exerted by the fluid-driven actuator 100 is measured over increasing pressures using a customized force measurement setup as illustrated in
The resistive grip force applied by the fluid-driven actuator 100 during pressurization is measured using a universal testing machine (Model 3345, Instron, MA, USA), with its schematic shown in
With the extension actuators such as the secondary bladder 302 or the second air bladder 508, the fluid-driven actuators 100,150 can be characterized in terms of their extension torques generated at different flexion angles when they were pressurized at 70 kPa. The torque output is obtained using a customized torque rig with a torque transducer (FT01, Forsentek, China) mounted and using the second air bladder 508 of the fluid-driven actuator 150 of
Apart from using TPU-coated fabrics to fabricate the actuator, the fluid-driven actuator 100,150 may be directly casted/molded (industry setting, large scale manufacturing) or 3D-printed (additive manufacturing, small scale prototyping) using polymers such as, but not limited to, Thermoplastic Urethane (TPU), Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE), Silicone Rubber, to form the folded bladder and sheet-like bladder, and these two other exemplary manufacturing processes would be described next.
B. Casting/Molding (Using Polymers Such as, but not Limited to Thermoplastic Urethane (TPU), Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE), Silicone Rubber).
The first actuator base 556 functions as a restraint and has seven apertures 564 formed at intervals along the longitudinal first actuator base 556 to correspond to the seven buttons 558 of the first actuator body 554. Each aperture 564 is slightly smaller than the corresponding button 558 so that each button 558 frictionally fits within each aperture 564 and the aperture 564 can secure the respective buttons 558.
The second fluid-driven actuator 580 as illustrated in
To secure the buttons 586 to the apertures 588, the second actuator body 582 is folded to form a plurality of folds 590 to align or register the position of the buttons 586 with the apertures 588 and each button 586 is then inserted snugly through a respective aperture 588, as shown in
It can thus be appreciated that the fluid-driven actuator 100,150 may be directly casted/molded to integrally form the inner fluid bladder and a third exemplary process for making the fluid-driven actuator 100,150 is described next.
C. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing (Using Polymers Such as, but not Limited to Thermoplastic Urethane (TPU), Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE).
The fluid-driven actuator 100,150 may also be 3D-printed (additive manufacturing, small scale prototyping) and in this instance, the fluid-driven actuator 100,150 is 3D printed from a TPU based flexible material, Ninjaflex™′ and other flexible filaments for 3D printing may be used.
A 3D printer is set up and controlled via Simplify3D™ slicer software and
Similar to the fluid-driven actuators 100,150, pressurization of the inner cavity 610 of the pneumatic actuator 600 allows different profiles of the pneumatic actuator 600 to be achieved.
Bending—with the strain limiting layer 606 restraining the bladder's expansion, upon pressurization of the inner cavity 610 of the bending actuator 602 (but not the strain limiting inner cavity 612), the bending actuator 602 undergoes expansion at the top whereas the expansion at the bottom is constricted by the strain limiting layer 606, causing a bending profile of the pneumatic actuator 600 to be achieved. If the pressurization is reduced (i.e. pressurized air is sucked out of the inner cavity 610), a straightening profile may be obtained.
Twisting—the strain limiting layer 606 may be designed to selectively limit the expansion of the bladder 602 upon pressurization so that expansion of the bladder 602 may be limited to one longitudinal side and this causes a twisting profile of the pneumatic actuator 600 to be achieved as shown in
Straightening—similar to the fluid-driven actuator 100,150, the strain limiting inner cavity 612 of the strain limiting layer 606 may be inflated with pressurized air and this allows the pneumatic actuator 600 to straighten as shown in
Applications
The fluid-driven actuator 100,150,600 may be adapted for many applications and a number of exemplary applications will be provided here.
i) Soft Robotic Glove for Assistive, Rehabilitation and Prosthetic Applications
The actuator-finger pockets 652 are made from stretchable lycra fabrics as shown in
Since it is possible to achieve a fully fabric-based robotic glove 650, the total weight of the glove may be reduced considerably (eg. approximately 99 g). Additionally, inflation of the actuators 100 does not add significant amount of extra weight to the hand as they work under air pressure.
An optical-based motion analysis system with eight cameras (Vicon Motion System Ltd., UK) is used to capture the maximum range of motion of the robotic glove 650 to assist the movement of fingers of a healthy subject. Reflective markers were attached to the robotic glove 650 and motion profiles of the index finger and thumb are tracked. The reflective markers are attached to the index finger at locations corresponding to the fingertip, distal interphalangeal (DIP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and MCP joints. For the thumb, the reflective markers are attached to IP, MCP, and CMC joints. The fluid-driven actuators are next pressurized at 70 kPa. For the index finger, the mean peak flexion angles for DIP, PIP and MCP are measured to be 47.7±8.1°, 89.8±4.4°, and 75.3±3.6° respectively. For the thumb, the mean peak flexion angles for IP, MCP and CMC were 34.0±5.5°, 48.7±4.8°, and 56.0±2.1° respectively.
An electro-pneumatic control system 700 is used to control the robotic glove 650, and specifically actuation of each fluid-driven actuator 100 of the robotic glove 650 to allow isolated control of each fluid-driven actuator 100.
The electro-pneumatic control system 700 includes a controller 708 (eg. Arduino Mega, Arduino) for controlling a miniature solenoid valve 710 (eg. VQ110U, SMC, Japan; Extension Actuators: X-Valve, Parker, USA) and a miniature diaphragm pneumatic pump/air source 712 (eg. D737-23-01, Parker, USA). The controller 700 includes a force/position controller 714 and is arranged to receive a control position signal eF/θ in response to a force reference signal F/θref. and the measured force signal F/θ from the force/position sensor 706. Based on the eF/θ signal, the force/position controller 714 is arranged to generate a desired air pressure signal Pref which is summed with the measured pressure signal P from the pressure sensor 704 to generate a pressure control signal ep for a pressure controller 716. The pressure controller 716 then generates a pulse width modulation (PWM) signal to control the pneumatic pump/air source 712 and the valve 710 to regulate the amount of pressurized air to supply into the actuator 702. Broadly, the readings from the pressure sensor 704 is used by the controller 700 to control the activation and deactivation of the valve 710 and the pneumatic pump 712 to achieve the desired air pressure in the actuator 702 in order to produce a desired movement of the actuator 702.
In this embodiment, the electro-pneumatic control system 700 further includes a user control device 718 which may be a computing device (eg. server, laptop, computer, smart phone etc) having a communication module 720 for communicating with the controller 708. The communication may be wired communication or wireless communication such as Bluetooth or via the internet or cloud, for example if a doctor is sending commands remotely to control the controller 708.
The user control device 718 includes a customized software application with a GUI 722, as illustrated in
In this control mode, the user control device 718 further includes a set of manual buttons 734a,734b,734c,734d as illustrated in
(ii) Cyclic Movement Training Mode
The GUI 722 is also preprogrammed for cyclic movement training mode 726, for example, cyclical stretching that involves repeated hand closing and opening. Passive cyclical stretching, combining with active repeated task practice, has shown therapeutic effects on clinical task performances and impairment measures for stroke patient with substantial upper extremity impairment. This control strategy allows cyclic movement training of different tasks, such as hand grasping and pinching. In this control mode, the fluid-driven actuators 100, and in particular the flexion and extension actions, are sequentially activated by software and assist the bidirectional finger flexion and extension. Additionally, the flexion or extension assistances can be selectively turned off depending on the patient's condition. For example, for stroke patients that have the residual ability to voluntarily flex their fingers, the flexion assistance can be turned off so that only extension assistance is provided to open their hands while allowing them to close their hands voluntarily.
(iii) Intention-Driven Task-Specific Training Mode—EMG
In this intention-driven strategy, an open-loop EMG logic is adopted to detect the user intent with two EMG sensors. The control of the robotic glove 650 is achieved by monitoring the state of the muscle signals at the finger flexors and the finger extensors to three conditions: i) ‘activate’, ii) ‘hold’, and iii) ‘release’. The ‘activate’ condition is met when the muscle signal from the finger flexors exceeds the flexor threshold. In this condition, the pre-selected group of fluid-driven actuators 100 is pressurized, flexing the fingers as shown in
(iv) Bilateral Rehabilitation Training Mode
In this control mode, the user attempts to perform bimanual ADL tasks simultaneously. It has been found that bimanual therapy is able to promote functional motor recovery with improved upper limb movement coordination and synchronization. A data glove 736 with ability to track the hand kinematics through five individual flex sensors 738 (eg. FS, Spectra Symbol, USA) is worn on the non-paretic hand as shown in
It should be appreciated that the GUI 722 may be implemented via a customized smart phone application (app) as part of the user control device 718. The app may communicate wirelessly (Bluetooth or Wi-Fi) with the controller 708 and the sensor data may be fed to the smart phone or cloud-shared to a server.
Apart from being an assistive device, the robotic glove may be used as a prosthetic application, and the robotic glove may be configured to hold and lift objects with different diameters and weights.
As it can be appreciated from the described embodiment, with the fluid-driven actuator 100 having a bending actuator 200 with an integrally formed inner fluid bladder 202, there is greater freedom to manufacture the actuator 100 and in particular, the bending actuator 200 may be fabricated as a straight piece, with actuator locking mechanisms 738, as shown in
With the advantages of customizable bending profiles, the actuator 100 may thus achieve desired actuation at targeted joint location, for example the MCP finger joint and ankle joint shown in
Indeed, the described embodiment should not be considered as limitative and there are other variations and possibilities. For example, while it is preferred, the inner fluid bladder 202 may not be integrally formed with the bending actuator 200. Also, the folds 204 of the air bladder 200 may be varied and have different dimensions and sizes, such as that illustrated in
Further, the fluid-driven actuator 100 may be produced with multilayer folding such as that illustrated in
Also, the first and second corrugated air bladders 742,744 may be structured differently to create different bending forces at different segments of the fluid-driven actuator 100. For example, the second corrugated air bladder 744 may be formed with two air segments 744a,744b which are independently inflatable as shown in
The fluid-driven actuator 100 may be combined with a conventional bellow type actuator 750 to enhance the bending and bending force of the bellow-type actuator, as shown in the
Similarly, the fluid-driven actuator 100 may be actuated at specific segments such as that described above in relation to
Incorporating multiple fluid-driven actuators 100 can create motions with multi degrees of freedom (DOF). For example,
In other words, the main difference between the arm segment 808 and the hand segment 812 is the spacing of folds 810,814. For the arm, continuous bending modality with proper bending angle is preferred, and thus, the spacing between two adjacent folds 810 is relatively large, compared with distance between adjacent folds 814 of the hand segment 812. In this way, the folds 810 can hardly affect each other and over bending of one joint is prevented. For the hand segment 812, large bending angle is preferred to achieve grabbing motions of a human hand. Thus, the spacing between the folds 814 is small and there are more amounts of folds 814. The folds 814 can interact with adjacent folds 814, so the bending force is larger.
The restraint member 806 is used to maintain stiffness of the robotic arm, and it can also help release the hand segment 812 from a grabbing motion. By using different heights, widths and spacing of the folds 810,814,816, different bending modalities may be achieved. An example of the parameters of the arm fluid-driven actuator 800 of
With the arrangement of
The robotic arm 800 is made from fabric similar to the fluid-driven actuator 100 and this is illustrated in
In addition to the robotic arm 850, the fluid-driven actuator 100 may be adapted for other applications such as:
Multi-Segments Robotic Arm
Robotic Arm with More Degree of Freedoms (DoFs)
Four joint actuators 864 are attached at the first two segments 874,876, so that the joint actuators 864 cooperate to bend the SRA 860 in different directions upon inflation. To make the joint actuator 864, a piece of TPU coated nylon fabric 880 of a required dimension is used and masking tape 882 is pasted on the TPU side of the nylon fabric 880 to prevent sealing of unwanted areas, as shown in
Two of the joint actuators 864 are attached to one of the segments 874,876 of the SRA main body 862 by wrapping and sealing a thin piece of fabric on the main body 862. It should be noted that the joint actuators 864 located at the first segment 874 is oriented differently from the joint actuators 864 located at the second segment 876. When the joint actuator 864 is inflated, each fold 886 becomes a small air bladder, and the folds 886 will press on each other to generate a bending moment on the SRA. Therefore, the SRA can bend at the low-stiffness segments 874,876 upon actuating the joint actuators 864. Since the inflation volume of the joint actuator 864 is small, a quick response reaction can be achieved.
The gripper 866 is made in a similar manner as the joint actuator 864, only the size and the masking area is adjusted accordingly. The gripper 866 is attached at the distal end of the arm in Link D. The gripper 866 has two bending points at the folding positions, so the gripper 866 can mimic the motion of a human hand and complete a full grabbing action. When releasing the object, the gripper 866 is deflated, and the pressure in the SRA main body 862 would straighten the gripper 866. The gripper 866 is designed to horizontally grab an object, similar to human grabbing motion.
In a specific application of the SRA 860, the SRA 860 may be adapted as wearable robotics such as a supernumerary arm or “sixth finger”, particularly since the SRA 860 is light.
In the above examples, a fabric based fluid-driven actuator 100 is used as an example. However, it would be apparent that other than using fabric-based soft actuators for exoskeleton applications, the fluid-driven actuator 100 may be replaced by polymer-based actuators such as that produced by casting/molding (large scale manufacturing) or 3D-printing (small scale prototyping) as described in
In a further variation, it is envisaged that the robotic glove 650 and the fluid-driven actuators 100 may be fully polymer-based to create an exoskeleton sleeve for assistive, rehabilitation, and prosthetic applications (Polymeric Actuators+Polymeric Glove or other wearable platform).
An exoskeleton sleeve 890 for assistive, rehabilitation, and prosthetic applications may be produced by integrating 3D printed actuators (polymer/TPU based) with a 3D printed wearable platform. The exoskeleton sleeve 890 can aid the fingers, wrist and elbow joints achieve their full range of motion and allow patients to conduct rehabilitation at home or use the exoskeleton sleeve as an assistive device for daily activities or even for prosthetic applications.
The exoskeleton sleeve 890 comprises three modular components—exoskeleton glove 892, exoskeleton wrist brace 894 and exoskeleton elbow brace 896 to assist range of motions in the three joints—finger, wrist and elbow joints respectively. All three modular components 892,894,896 are 3D printed or casted/molded using TPU, PLA or other polymer based materials.
Having now fully described the invention, it should be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many modifications can be made hereto without departing from the scope as claimed.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10201700565X | Jan 2017 | SG | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SG2018/050028 | 1/17/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/136004 | 7/26/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3981528 | Freudenberg | Sep 1976 | A |
4274399 | Mummert | Jun 1981 | A |
6178872 | Schulz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
8328743 | Farrell et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20100305717 | Tong et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20150090113 | Galloway | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150217444 | Asada et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150266186 | Mosadegh | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150354547 | Ting | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160114482 | Lessing et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160252110 | Galloway | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20190015233 | Galloway | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1764786 | Apr 2006 | CN |
101622107 | Jan 2010 | CN |
106309083 | Jan 2017 | CN |
19617852 | Oct 1997 | DE |
1190819 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2006347 | Jan 2006 | JP |
11201609609 | Dec 2016 | SG |
2015066143 | May 2015 | WO |
2015191007 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2015191585 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016172670 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2016210438 | Dec 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written opinion and ISR in International Application PCT/SG2018/050028. |
Connolly, F., Polygerinos, P., Walsh, C.J., Bertoldi, K., “Mechanical Programming of Soft Actuators by Varying Fiber Angle”, Soft Robotics, vol. 2, No. 1, 2015, pp. 26-32. |
Polygerinos, P., “Modeling of Soft Fiber-reinforced Bending Actuators”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, No. 3, Jun. 2015, pp. 778-789. |
Galloway, K.C., Polygerinos, P., Walsh, C.J., Wood, R.J., “Mechanically programmable bend radius for fiber-reinforced soft actuators”, 16th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Nov. 2013, pp. 1-6. |
Hu, X.L., et al., “The Effects of Post stroke Upper-limb Training with an Electromyography (EMG)-driven Hand Robot”, Journal of Electromyopgrahy and Kinesiology, 23(5), 2013, pp. 1065-1074. |
Butler, A.J., Blanton, S.R., Rowe, V.T., Wolf, S.L., “Attempting to improve function and quality of life using the FTM Protocol”, Journal of Neurological Physical Therapy, 30(3), Sep. 2006, pp. 148-156. |
Farrell, J.F., Hoffman, H.B., Snyder, J.L., Giuliani, C.A., Bohannon, R.W., “Orthotic aided training of the paretic upper limb in chronic stroke: results of a phase 1 trial”, NeuroRehabilitation, 22(2), 2007, pp. 99-103. |
McCombe Waller, S., Whitall, J., “The Sequential Combination of Bilateral and Unilateral Arm Training to Promote Arm and Hand Function in Patients with More Severe Paresis”, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2008. |
Heise, K., Liuzzi, G., Zimerman, M., Gerloff, C., Hummel, F., “Intensive orthosis-based home training of the upper limb leads to pronouced improvements in patients in the chronic stage after brain lesions”, Saebo, 2010. |
Deering, J., Terry, K., Silver, N., Amling, L., Araniecke, C., Barry, J., “Will Upper Extremity Performance Change Following Use of a Dynamic Orthosis Exercise Session in Individuals with Chronic Stroke ?: A Pilot Study”, Maryville University, St Louis, Missouri, 2009. |
Krug, G., Ebert, A., Schmittgens, J., Stanley, H., “The Effectiveness of Bilateral vs. Unilateral Task Retraining Using the SaeboFlex Orthosis in Individuals with Sub-Acute or Chronic Stroke”, Department of Occupational Therapy and Occupational Science, University of Missouri, 2010. |
Kadowaki, Y. Noritsugu, T., Takaiwa, M., Sasaki, D., Kato, M., “Development of Soft Power-Assist Glove and Control Based on Human Intent”, Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, vol. 23, No. 2, 2011, pp. 281-291. |
Polygerinos, P., Wang, Z., Galloway, K.C., Wood, R.J., Walsh, C.J., “Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 73, Nov. 2015, pp. 135-143. |
Polygerinos, P. et al., “Soft Robotic Glove for Hand Rehabilitation and Task Specific Training”, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2015, pp. 2913-2919. |
Polygerinos, P., Galloway, K.C., Sanan, S., Herman, M., Walsh, C.J., “EMG Controlled Soft Robotic Glove for Assistance During Activities of Daily Living”, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2015, pp. 55-60. |
Torens-Bonilla, B., Parietti, F., Asada, H.H., “Demonstration-based control of supernumerary robotic limbs”, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2012, pp. 3936-3942. |
Parietti, F, Chan, K., Asada, H.H., “Bracing the human body with supernumerary Robotic Limbs for physical assistance and load reduction”, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2014, pp. 141-148. |
Davenport, C., Parietti, F., Asada, H.H., “Design and Biomechanical Analysis of Supernumerary Robotic Limbs”, ASME 2012 5th Annual Dynamic Systems and Control Conference joint with the JSME 2012 11th Motion and Vibration Conference, 2012, pp. 1-7. |
Sasaki, D., Noritsugu, T., Takaiwa, M., Yamamoto, H., “Wearable power assist device for hand grasping using pneumatic artificial rubber muscle”, IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communicatoin, Sep. 2004, pp. 655-660. |
Mosadegh, B. et al., “Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly”, Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 24, 2014, pp. 2163-2170. |
Polygerinos, P. et al., “Modeling of Soft Fiber-Reinforced Bending Actuators”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2015, pp. 1-12. |
Yap H.K., Ang B.W.K., Lim J.H., Goh J.C.H., Yeow R.C.H, “A Fabric-Regulated Soft Robotic Glove with User Intent Detection using EMG and RFID for Hand Assistive Application”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 2016, pp. 16-21. |
Yap H.K., Lim J.H., Nasrallah F., Cho H.G.J., Yeow C.H., “Characterisation and evaluation of soft elastomeric actuators for hand assistive and rehabilitation applications”, J Med Eng Technol, vol. 40, 2016, pp. 199-209. |
Yap, H.K., “A Magnetic Resonance Compatible Soft Wearable Robotic Glove for Hand Rehabilitation and Brain Imaging”, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2016, pp. 1-12. |
Zhang, M., Mak, A.F., “In vivo friction properties of human skin”, Prosthet Orthot Int, vol. 23, 1999, pp. 135-141. |
Matheus, K., Dollar, A.M., “Benchmarking grasping and manipulation: Properties of the Objects of Daily Living.”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2010, pp. 5020-5027. |
Yap, H.K., Lim, J.H., Goh, J.C.H., Yeow, C.-H., “Design of a Soft Robotic Glove for Hand Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients with Clenched Fist Deformity using Inflatable Plastic Actuators”, Journal of Medical Devices, vol. 10, 2016, 044504. |
Fischer H.C. et al., “Use of a Portable Assistive Glove to Facilitate Rehabilitation in Stroke Survivors with Severe Hand Impairment”, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, vol. 24, No. 3, 2016, pp. 344-351. |
Herrnstadt, G., Alavi, N., Neva, J., Boyd, L.A., Menon, C., “Preliminary results for a force feedback bimanual rehabilitation system”, 6th IEEE Conference of Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Jun. 2016, pp. 776-781. |
Cauraugh, J.H., Lodha, N., Naik, S.K., Summers, J.J., “Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: a structured review and meta-analysis”, Hum Mov Sci, vol. 29, 2010, pp. 853-870. |
Thieme, H., Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Behrens, J., Dohle, C., “Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke”, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012. |
Examination Report No. 1 dated Apr. 5, 2023 for Australian Application No. 2018210750. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190374422 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |