Fluid ejection devices in inkjet printers provide drop-on-demand ejection of fluid drops. Inkjet printers produce images by ejecting ink drops through a plurality of nozzles onto a print medium, such as a sheet of paper. The nozzles are typically arranged in one or more arrays, such that properly sequenced ejection of ink drops from the nozzles causes characters or other images to be printed on the print medium as the printhead and the print medium move relative to each other. In a specific example, a thermal inkjet printhead ejects drops from a nozzle by passing electrical current through a heating element to generate heat and vaporize a small portion of the fluid within a firing chamber. In another example, a piezoelectric inkjet printhead uses a piezoelectric material actuator to generate pressure pulses that force ink drops out of a nozzle.
When nozzles sit exposed to ambient atmospheric conditions while in idle non-jetting states, evaporative water loss through the nozzle bores can alter the local composition of ink volumes within the bores, the firing chambers, and in some cases, beyond an inlet pinch toward the shelf/trench (ink slot) interface. Following periods of nozzle inactivity, the variation in properties of these localized volumes can modify drop ejection dynamics (e.g., drop trajectories, velocities, shapes and colors). When printing resumes after an inactive, non-jetting period, there is an inherent delay before the local ink volumes within the nozzle bores are refreshed. This delay, and the associated effects on drop ejection dynamics following a non-jetting period, are collectively referred to as decap response. Continued improvement of inkjet printers and other fluid ejection systems relies in part on mitigating decap response issues.
The present embodiments will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a and 2b show, respectively, a side view and a plan view of a portion of an example fluid ejection device, according to an embodiment;
As noted above, decap response impacts stagnant ink volumes local to the nozzle bores, firing chambers, and other nearby areas within fluid ejection devices that interface with the surrounding environment during non-jetting, idle spans. In general, decap behaviors tend to manifest in the form of Pigment Ink Vehicle Separation (PIVS) and viscous plug dependent modes that create “first-drop-out” print quality complications. In the PIVS decap mode, water evaporation at the exposed bore creates a localized enrichment in non-volatile ink species within the bore and/or device firing chamber. This region-specific modification in the ink composition depletes the local in-chamber and/or in-bore ink volumes of their pigment content. When a nozzle affected by this dynamic returns to activity, the first drops ejected from the nozzle do not contain the same coloration as that of bulk renewed ink, which impacts the quality of the resultant printed drops on the page. Similarly, the viscous plug decap mode stems from the evaporation-driven “thickening” or “hardening” of ink stationed within the bore (and in some cases within the chamber as well) due to the depletion of in-ink water molecules and the subsequent elevation in the local ink viscosity. This type of decap response impacts the drop ejection dynamic and can result in drops that are mis-directed, drops with reduced velocities, and in some cases, no drops at all.
Prior methods of mitigating the decap response have focused mostly on ink formulation chemistries, minor architecture adjustments, tuning nozzle firing parameters, and/or servicing algorithms. These approaches have often been directed toward specific printer/platform implementations, however, and have therefore not provided a universally suitable solution.
Efforts to mitigate the decap response through adjustments in ink formulation, for example, often rely upon the inclusion of key additives that offer benefits only when paired with specific dispersion chemistries. Architecture focused strategies have typically leveraged shortened shelves (i.e., the length from the center of the firing resistor to the edge of the incoming ink-feed slot), the inclusion or exclusion of counter bores, and modifications to resistor sizes. These techniques, however, usually provide only minimal performance gains. Fire pulse routines have shown some improvements in targeted architectures when exercised as sub-TOE (turn on energy) mixing protocols for stirring ink within the nozzle to combat Pigment Ink Vehicle Separation (PIVS) forms of the decap dynamic, or by delivering more energetic stimulation of in-chamber ink volumes (delivered at higher voltages or through modified precursor pulse configurations) to compete against viscous plugging forms of the decap response. Again, however, this strategy provides only marginal gains in specific non-universal contexts. Servicing algorithms have functioned as the main systems-based fix. However, servicing algorithms typically generate waste ink and associated waste ink storage issues, in-printer aerosol, and print/wipe protocols that are only feasible for implementation as pre- or post-job exercises.
Embodiments of the present disclosure mitigate the decap response more generally through a systems-level, hardware approach that moves beyond currently available strategies for offsetting PIVS-based decap modes, to directly address the viscous plug based variety of decap response. This approach implements a composite, multi-level bore fabrication to create new types of in-nozzle flow channels that enable bulk ink supplies to be swept through portions of the bore. A standard, single tophat layer is partitioned into a two-layer stack with a first layer having flow channel features that funnel portions of a die-level recirculation flow through the nozzle bore. The second layer of the two-layer tophat stack functions to define a nozzle bore outlet in a manner similar to a traditional tophat layer.
There are various techniques that may be suitable to generate die-level fluid circulation. While die-level fluid circulation is integral to the concepts disclosed herein for achieving in-nozzle or thru-bore fluid flow, the techniques for generating such circulation are not the focus of this disclosure. Briefly, such techniques can include, for example, the integration of fluid-actuator-driven inertial pumps into primary fluid recirculation channels. The selective activation of fluid actuators integrated within fluidic channels at asymmetric locations (e.g., toward channel ends) can generate both unidirectional and bidirectional fluid flow through the channels. Depending on the actuator mechanism employed, temporal control over the mechanical operation or motion of the actuator can also provide directional control of fluid flow through a fluidic channel. Fluid actuators can be driven by a variety of actuator mechanisms such as thermal bubble resistor actuators, piezo membrane actuators, electrostatic (MEMS) membrane actuators, mechanical/impact driven membrane actuators, voice coil actuators, magneto-strictive drive actuators, alternating current electro-osmotic (ACEO) pump mechanisms, and so on. The fluid actuators can be integrated into the channels of microfluidic systems (e.g., fluid ejection devices) using conventional microfabrication processes. Other techniques for generating die-level fluid circulation include pressure differentials driven by off-die mechanisms such as an external pneumatic pump or syringe. Such mechanisms, however, are typically bulky, difficult to handle and program, and have unreliable connections.
Within fluid ejection devices, these and other die-level recirculation techniques can be useful in sweeping refreshed ink through the fluid/ink firing chambers. The presently disclosed thru-bore ink renewal approach, however, directly combats the evaporation-driven formation of in-bore viscous plug formation. This strategy expands the reach of prior printer systems-based avenues for managing the print output complications affiliated with the decap dynamic, and puts within reach the ideal of an “instant ON” nozzle that does not demand a series of refresh spits or servicing routines to ensure that the first drops printed following idle, non-jetting spans, are well matched to reference line quality.
In one example embodiment, a fluid ejection device includes a substrate with a fluid slot, and a chamber layer over the substrate that defines a firing chamber. The chamber layer also defines a fluidic channel that extends through the firing chamber and that is in fluid communication with the slot at first and second channel ends. The fluid ejection device includes a tophat layer formed as a two-layer stack over the chamber layer. Within the two-layer stack, a nozzle bore is formed over the firing chamber that comprises a greater cavity formed in a first layer of the stack and a lesser cavity formed in a second layer of the stack. The greater cavity of the nozzle bore encompasses a larger volume than the lesser cavity.
In another example embodiment, a fluid ejection device includes a substrate with a fluid slot, and a chamber layer over the substrate that defines a discontinuous channel having first and second parts. The device includes a two-layer tophat having first and second layers over the chamber layer. A notch channel is formed in the first layer to fluidically couple the first and second parts of the discontinuous channel. A nozzle bore formed in the two-layer tophat has a greater cavity formed in the first layer and a lesser cavity formed in the second layer. The device also includes a conduit formed in the first layer to fluidically couple the notch channel with the greater cavity of the nozzle bore.
In another example embodiment, a fluid ejection device includes a substrate with two fluid slots, and a chamber layer over the substrate that defines a firing chamber and a fluidic channel extending between the two fluid slots and through the firing chamber. A tophat layer is formed as a two-layer stack over the chamber layer, and a nozzle bore over the firing chamber includes a greater cavity formed in a first layer of the stack and a lesser cavity formed in a second layer of the stack, the greater cavity encompassing a larger volume than the lesser cavity.
Ink supply assembly 104 supplies fluid ink to printhead assembly 102 and includes a reservoir 120 for storing ink. Ink flows from reservoir 120 to inkjet printhead assembly 102. Ink supply assembly 104 and inkjet printhead assembly 102 can form either a one-way ink delivery system or a macro-recirculating ink delivery system. In a one-way ink delivery system, substantially all of the ink supplied to inkjet printhead assembly 102 is consumed during printing. In a macro-recirculating ink delivery system, however, only a portion of the ink supplied to printhead assembly 102 is consumed during printing. Ink not consumed during printing is returned to ink supply assembly 104.
In some implementations, inkjet printhead assembly 102 and ink supply assembly 104 are housed together in an inkjet cartridge or pen. In other implementations, ink supply assembly 104 is separate from inkjet printhead assembly 102 and supplies ink to inkjet printhead assembly 102 through an interface connection, such as a supply tube. In either implementation, reservoir 120 of ink supply assembly 104 may be removed, replaced, and/or refilled. Where inkjet printhead assembly 102 and ink supply assembly 104 are housed together in an inkjet cartridge, reservoir 120 can include a local reservoir located within the cartridge as well as a larger reservoir located separately from the cartridge. A separate, larger reservoir serves to refill the local reservoir. Accordingly, a separate, larger reservoir and/or the local reservoir may be removed, replaced, and/or refilled.
Mounting assembly 106 positions inkjet printhead assembly 102 relative to media transport assembly 108, and media transport assembly 108 positions print media 118 relative to inkjet printhead assembly 102. Thus, a print zone 122 is defined adjacent to nozzles 116 in an area between inkjet printhead assembly 102 and print media 118. In one implementation, inkjet printhead assembly 102 is a scanning type printhead assembly. As such, mounting assembly 106 includes a carriage for moving inkjet printhead assembly 102 relative to media transport assembly 108 to scan print media 118. In another implementation, inkjet printhead assembly 102 is a non-scanning type printhead assembly. As such, mounting assembly 106 fixes inkjet printhead assembly 102 at a prescribed position relative to media transport assembly 108. Thus, media transport assembly 108 positions print media 118 relative to inkjet printhead assembly 102.
In one implementation, inkjet printhead assembly 102 includes one printhead 114. In another implementation, inkjet printhead assembly 102 is a wide-array assembly with multiple printheads 114. In wide-array assemblies, an inkjet printhead assembly 102 typically includes a carrier that carries printheads 114, provides electrical communication between printheads 114 and electronic controller 110, and provides fluidic communication between printheads 114 and ink supply assembly 104.
In one embodiment, inkjet printing system 100 is a drop-on-demand thermal bubble inkjet printing system where the printhead(s) 114 is a thermal inkjet (TIJ) printhead. The TIJ printhead implements a thermal resistor ejection element in an ink chamber to vaporize ink and create bubbles that force ink or other fluid drops out of a nozzle 116. In another embodiment, inkjet printing system 100 is a drop-on-demand piezoelectric inkjet printing system where the printhead(s) 114 is a piezoelectric inkjet (PIJ) printhead that implements a piezoelectric material actuator as an ejection element to generate pressure pulses that force ink drops out of a nozzle.
Electronic printer controller 110 typically includes one or more processors 111, firmware, software, one or more computer/processor-readable memory components 113 including volatile and non-volatile memory components (i.e., non-transitory tangible media), and other printer electronics for communicating with and controlling inkjet printhead assembly 102, mounting assembly 106, and media transport assembly 108. Electronic controller 110 receives data 124 from a host system, such as a computer, and temporarily stores data 124 in a memory 113. Typically, data 124 is sent to inkjet printing system 100 along an electronic, infrared, optical, or other information transfer path. Data 124 represents, for example, a document and/or file to be printed. As such, data 124 forms a print job for inkjet printing system 100 and includes one or more print job commands and/or command parameters.
In one implementation, electronic printer controller 110 controls inkjet printhead assembly 102 for ejection of ink drops from nozzles 116. Thus, electronic controller 110 defines a pattern of ejected ink drops that form characters, symbols, and/or other graphics or images on print media 118. The pattern of ejected ink drops is determined by the print job commands and/or command parameters.
In one implementation, electronic controller 110 includes a fluid pump module 128 stored in a memory 113 of controller 110. Pump module 128 includes coded instructions executable by one or more processors 111 of controller 110 to cause the processor(s) 111 to implement various functions of a fluidic pump (not shown in
Referring again to
A two-layer tophat layer 119 is formed over chamber layer 210. The two-layer tophat 119 forms a two-layer stack that includes a first layer 214 and a second layer 216. Thus, the first layer 214 is an interim layer within the two-layer tophat 119 positioned between the second layer 216 (i.e., the top-most layer) of the two-layer tophat 119 and the chamber layer 210. The thickness of the two-layer tophat layer 119 is on the order of 20 microns. However, the thickness may be more or less than 20 microns in some implementations. The thickness of the first layer 214 is on the order of 15 microns, while the thickness of the second layer 216 is on the order of 5 microns. While these dimensions may vary in some implementations, the thickness of the first layer 214 of the two-layer tophat 119 is generally on the order of between 50-75% of the whole thickness of the two-layer tophat layer 119. The two-layer tophat layer 119 is typically formed of SU8 epoxy, but it can also be made of other materials such as a polyimide.
A dual-sized nozzle bore 218 is formed in the two-layer tophat 119 which spans both the first layer 214 and second layer 216 of the tophat layer 119. As shown in
Referring again to
Referring to
A fluid conduit 306 is formed in the first layer 214 of the two-layer tophat 119. In addition, a pump bore 308 is formed in the first layer 214 of the two-layer tophat 119 over the resistor pump 304. The fluid conduit 306 and pump bore 308 are shown in the first layer 214 view of
As fluid/ink is pumped by resistor pump 304 and circulates in a primary fluid flow around the fluidic channel 212, the fluid conduit 306 formed in the first layer 214 of the two-layer tophat 119 captures and routes some of the flow through the greater cavity 220 within nozzle bore 218. In addition, this design enables amounts of fluid/ink pumped by resistor pump 304 to flow directly from the pump bore 308, through the conduit 306, and into the nozzle bore 218 without traveling through the primary fluidic channel 212. Thus, fluid/ink flows through the nozzle bore 218 via a secondary path and provides bulk, refreshed ink volume that disrupts stagnant volumes within the nozzle region and improves the print quality of the first printed drops.
As noted above,
In the implementation shown in
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/035556 | 4/27/2012 | WO | 00 | 11/4/2014 |