The disclosure relates to a fluid ejection head that reduces the effect of viscosity variations on fluid refill times thereby improving the firing frequency of the fluid ejection head.
It is desirable to operate a fluid ejection cartridge at a consistent rate regardless of the viscosity of the fluid being ejected. Unfortunately, the jetting frequency of the traditional fluid ejection head tends to be inversely proportional to the viscosity of the fluid being ejected.
In some applications different fluids are used in fluid cartridges for a variety of printing or fluid dispensing applications. The user is interested in achieving consistent fluid ejection at a consistent speed. However, the fluid refill time for a fluid chamber of a traditional fluid ejection head is highly dependent on the viscosity of the fluid being ejected. An ejection head for a low viscosity fluid refills faster than for a high viscosity fluid. The increased speed achieved with a low viscosity fluid reduces fluid damping, causing the ejection head to become less stable. At a high viscosity, the fluid ejection speed is limited, reducing throughput. What is desired is a fluid ejection head design that will mitigate the effects of fluid viscosity changes and will function closer to the targeted operating point.
In view of the foregoing, an embodiment of the disclosure provides a fluid ejection head that includes a semiconductor substrate containing a plurality of fluid ejectors thereon and a fluid supply via etched therethrough. A flow feature layer is attached to the semiconductor substrate. The flow feature layer has a plurality of fluid channels and fluid chambers for the plurality of fluid ejectors, wherein the fluid channels are configured to provide fluid from the fluid supply via through the fluid channels to the fluid chambers for ejection of fluid through fluid nozzles associated with the fluid chambers. The fluid channels include inlet channels and expansion channels that are configured to compensate for fluid viscosity variations. A nozzle plate containing the fluid nozzles is attached to the flow feature layer.
In another embodiment, the disclosure provides a method for reducing the slope of fluid refill time versus fluid viscosity for a fluid ejection head. The method includes providing a semiconductor substrate containing a plurality of fluid ejectors thereon and a fluid supply via etched therethrough. A flow feature layer is attached to the semiconductor substrate, wherein the flow feature layer has a plurality of fluid channels and fluid chambers for the plurality of fluid ejectors. The fluid channels are configured to provide fluid from the fluid supply via through the fluid channels to the fluid chambers for ejection of fluid through fluid nozzles associated with the fluid chambers. Inlet channels and expansion channels are provided and are configured to compensate for fluid viscosity variations are formed between each of the fluid channels and fluid chambers of the flow feature layer. A nozzle plate is attached to the flow feature layer. Fluid is fed from a fluid cartridge to the fluid ejection head ejected from the fluid ejection head.
In another embodiment, there is provide a fluid ejection device for ejecting a fluid having a viscosity ranging from about 0.5 to about 3.5 millipascal second at 40° C. The fluid ejection device has a fluid ejection head attached to a fluid supply cartridge containing the fluid. The fluid ejection head includes a semiconductor substrate containing a plurality of fluid ejectors thereon and a fluid supply via etched therethrough. A flow feature layer is attached to the semiconductor substrate, wherein the flow feature layer contains a plurality of fluid channels and fluid chambers for the plurality of fluid ejectors. The fluid channels are configured to provide the fluid from the fluid supply via through the fluid channels to the fluid chambers for ejection of the fluid through fluid nozzles associated with the fluid chambers. The fluid channels include inlet channels and expansion channels that are configured to compensate for fluid viscosity variations. A nozzle plate containing the fluid nozzles is attached to the flow feature layer. The expansion channels have an expansion channel width (WE) to inlet channel width (WI) ratio (WE/WI) ranging from about 3 to about 4.
In some embodiments, the expansion channels are disposed between each of the inlet channels and associated fluid chambers.
In some embodiments, the expansion channels having an expansion channel width (WE) to inlet channel width (WI) ratio (WE/WI) ranging from about 3 to about 4. In other embodiments, the expansion channels having an expansion channel length (LE)=((WE/WI)−1)/2*WI*1/tan(30), wherein LE/WI=((WE/WI)−1)/(2*1/tan(30)). In still other embodiments, LE/WI ranges from about 1.5 to about 4.0. In some embodiments, WE/WI is greater than 1.5 and wherein LE/WI is greater than 1.5.
In some embodiments, each of the fluid channels also comprises a filter element.
In some embodiments, the inlet channels and expansion channels are configured to reduce a slope of fluid refill time versus fluid viscosity for fluid viscosities ranging from about 0.5 to about 2.5 millipascal second at 40° C.
An advantage of the disclosed embodiments, is that a fluid ejection head may be used on a fluid supply cartridge for dispensing a variety of fluids over a relatively wide fluid viscosity range. The traditional fluid ejection head has a fluid channel resistance that has a nearly proportional relationship with fluid viscosity. If the viscosity is reduced by one half, then the refill time is also reduced by about one half. The present disclosure provides an ejector designed with a fluid channel that lessens the effects of viscosity so that if the viscosity of the fluid changes, the performance is not as greatly affected.
By way of background, the Reynolds number is a value used to describe the flow of a fluid in a channel. When there is a decrease in viscosity of the fluid in the channel, the flow rate naturally increases which increases the Reynolds number. If a fluid ejection head could be designed such that the effective width of a fluid channel that provides fluid to a fluid chamber changes as a function of Reynolds number, then a negative feedback control system would have to be provided to regulate the flow of fluid in the fluid channel.
In order to avoid the need to provide a feedback system to regulate the flow of fluid in the fluid channel that provides fluid to the fluid chamber, a fluid channel that includes an inlet channel and an expansion channel is used to regulate the flow of fluid to the fluid chamber. Accordingly, it is believed that a properly designed fluid channel will act as a variable resistance that is dependent on the Reynolds number of the inlet channel.
As illustrated in
The foregoing considerations may be applied to a design for a fluid ejection head 18 (
Referring again to
A plot of the relationship of Expansion Angle to Reynolds Number is illustrated in
Since the Reynolds number decreases as the fluid flow expands in the expansion channel, there is a practical limit to the expansion channel length LE. Also, if the expansion channel is much wider than the fluid ejector 62 and 74 there is the possibility that air can become trapped in the fluid chambers 60 and 72 causing poor performance. The foregoing considerations provide guidance as to the width and length ranges for the expansion channel. For a wide range of viscosity control, the ratio of the expansion channel width to inlet channel width (WE/WI) should be about 3 to about 4. Lower ratios provide less regulation of high viscosity fluids since the flow expansion is limited. Ratios higher than 5 may be less practical as the additional expansion channel width will not significantly reduce the flow resistance for the higher viscosity fluids.
The WE/WI ratio may be used to define the expansion channel length LE. For example, if designing for a maximum expansion angle of 12 of 30 degrees, the expansion channel length LE can be calculated as follows: LE=((WE/WI)−1)/2*(WI)*1/tan(30). Accordingly, the expansion channel length to inlet width ratio is determined as follows: LE/WI=((WE/WI) −1)/(2*tan(30)).
The following table shows the calculated expansion channel length to inlet channel width ratios as a function of the ratios of expansion channel width to inlet channel width for the example of a maximum expansion angle of 30 degrees.
The width of the expansion channel can be modified as needed for a particular application. For example, if high viscosity fluids are not used, then the width of the expansion channel can be reduced while maintaining the expansion channel length. For typically applications, the following ratios may be used as a general rule:
Referring again to
It is believed that fluid ejection heads designed according to the embodiments described herein may be suitable for a wider variety of fluids so that the viscosity of the fluids will have less of an effect on the fluid refill times than with prior art ejection heads. For all of the embodiments disclosed herein, the thickness of the flow feature layer is not critical to improving the fluid refill times for the ejection head.
Having described various aspects and exemplary embodiments and several advantages thereof, it will be recognized by those of ordinary skills that the disclosed embodiments is susceptible to various modifications, substitutions and revisions within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.