The present invention relates generally to fluid handling systems and apparatus and, more particularly, to fluid handling systems and apparatus for use in the oilfield industry.
Currently in the oil in gas industry a large emphasis has been put on the development of unconventional and “tight” reservoirs. This includes shale gas and oil, low permeability rock and coal bed methane. For the development of these reservoirs large hydraulic fracturing operations (also called fracing, fraccing or fracking) have been undertaken in conjunction with long horizontally drilled wellbores. The process of fracturing commonly is completed using large quantities of fracturing fluid, typically ranging from hundreds to tens of thousand of cubic meters of produced and fresh water.
The handling and logistics of dealing with these large amounts of fracturing fluids has led to the development of specialized equipment and processes. The most common approach initially was to haul in large 400 barrel (400 bbl) tank farms as shown in
Major disadvantages of this type of set up include large spatial foot print required, dependency on 400 bbl tank availability, large mobilization requirements, high mobilization/demobilization costs, high rental costs, tank cleaning costs, labour intensive hosing/manifold system required to tie all the 400 bbl tanks together, high water heating cost and high heat loss due to high surface-area-to-volume ratio of multiple 400 bbl tanks, and high rig matting requirements. A further disadvantage of such hosing/manifold system is that such system is subject to freezing during winter operations.
Other systems have been developed in an attempt to remove some of the disadvantages of the multiple 400 bbl tanks approach. One such system is to store large quantities of fracturing fluid in earthen lined or unlined pits and then transferring the fluid to a tank farm having a much smaller number of 400 bbl tanks, than the traditional set up. In this set up or system, the smaller number of 400 bbl tanks act as “buffer tank” so that fluid can be withdrawn at an equivalent rate to that required for the hydraulic fracturing operations. This method has benefits over the larger tank farms including smaller foot print, less heat loss. However, it requires large amounts of dirt work for the earthen pits and companies must abide by various environmental guide lines. This system also has some of the disadvantages as associated with larger tank farm set ups, including still requiring elaborate filling and suction manifold systems, as well as a need for high rate transfer pumping and piping system.
In recent years another method of fluid handling is the use of an above ground containment system (instead of earthen pits) along with the same smaller “buffer tank” system as used with the earthen pit system. This avoids the disadvantage associated with dirt work associated with the earthen pits. Such above ground containment system come in a variety of designs. Initially the primary design was a large corrugated sheet metal ring put up in sections of normally 4 ft×8 ft. These rings are then lined with a poly liner and used for fluid storage as shown in
To overcome the labour intensive assembly and disassembly of the currogated sheet metal containment rings, Poseidon Concepts Corp. of Calgary, Alberta, Canada has developed a containment ring system comprised of large panels (12 foot×24 foot) which is much quicker to set up due to their large panels (12′×24′ vs 4′×8′) and the use of a bolt-free connection system which utilizes a series of linking plates on the container's exterior (outside) surface only, as shown in
What is needed is a fluid handling and containment system which does not have the above-mentioned disadvantages.
The present invention is directed to overcoming the prior art deficiencies, including in the labour intensive assembly and disassembly of the fluid containment rings. The present invention is also directed to overcoming the prior art deficiencies in using multiple 400 bbl tanks to store and handle fluid during fracturing operations.
In one aspect the invention provides a fluid containment system comprising a plurality of curved panels having a front face a rear face, a top end, a bottom end and two side ends, wherein the plurality of curved panels are positioned serially adjacent one another in a generally upright or vertical manner so as to comprise a generally circular arrangement, with each of the plurality of curved panels further comprising at least one fastening member on its front face and wherein the fastening member is suitable to generally abut to a similar fastening member of an adjacent curved panel. Once fastened, the plurality of curved panels may be lined with a liner and used for fluid storage.
In a second aspect, the invention provides a fluid handling and containment apparatus comprising a tank suitable to hold a volume of fluid, the tank having a main compartment with a plurality of outlets exiting from the main compartment. These first and second aspects may be combined to contain and handle fluid in a system aspect.
In a method aspect, fluid may be directed from the fluid containment system of the first aspect, to the fluid handling and containment apparatus and then to a wellhead for use during fracturing operations.
Referring to the drawings, several aspects of the present invention are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in detail in the figures, wherein:
a-1d are perspective views of various prior art fluid containment and handling systems, with
a-5g are various views of another embodiment of a fluid handling and containment system and apparatus, similar to the embodiment of
a-6c are various perspective views of yet another embodiment a fluid handling and containment system and apparatus, illustrating storage of the system and apparatus as well as set-up of the system and apparatus;
a -7d are various views of yet another embodiment of a fluid handling and containment system and apparatus;
a-8e are various views of yet another embodiment of a fluid handling and containment system and apparatus, similar to the embodiment of
a-9c are various views of yet another embodiment of a fluid handling and containment system and apparatus, similar to the embodiments of
The following description is of a preferred embodiment by way of example only and without limitation to the combination of features necessary for carrying the invention into effect. Reference is to be had to the Figures in which identical reference numbers identify similar components. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features are shown in schematic or diagrammatic form in the interest of clarity and conciseness.
Referring to the
During operation, the panels 110 are positioned serially adjacent one another in a generally upright or vertical manner, on their bottom ends 110b, so as to comprise a generally circular or ring shape (as can be seen more clearly in
Each of the curved panels 110 comprises at least one fastening member 120, 120a on its front face 110f preferably at one of its side ends 111 or 112. Fastening member 120 is preferably a fastening flange 120a suitable to mate with, or generally abut to, a similar fastening member 120, 120b of an adjacent panel 110 (see
Preferably, the orientation or longitudinal plane F of the fastening flange 120 is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal plane P of the panel 110 (see, for example,
In a preferred embodiment, each of the fastening members 120 is provide with at least one fastener opening or passage 122 of sufficient size and dimensions to allow passage of a fastener therethrough. Further, in such preferred embodiment, the fastener openings 122 are positioned so as to align with the fastener openings 122 of an adjacent fastening flange 120 when adjacent panels 110 are aligned into the generally circular arrangement as shown in
Preferably, gussets 121 are provided to further secure fastening members 120 to the front face 110f of the panels 110 (see
In another embodiment of panels 110 (see
Preferably, the system 100 further comprises a carrying frame 130 of suitable dimensions to house a plurality of panels 110 in a generally upright and stacked or nested manner, as more clear shown in
Even more advantageously, less time will be required to manipulate individual panels 110 between a horizontal (transportation) position and a vertical upright (operating) position, because the panels 110 in the system 100 will remain in a generally upright configuration during both transportation (e.g. inside carrying frame 130) and operation.
More preferably, carrying frame 130 is provided with anchor points 140 and anchor members 142 to hold one or more panels 110 in a generally upright position (at anchor points 144) as more clearly shown in
Referring now to the
The tank may be top filled or further comprise an inlet 210i. Preferably, the tank 210, and its main compartment 211, has a capacity of at least one traditional 400 bbl tank (i.e. at least 63 m3) and the outlets 210o are at least 4″ diameter outlets to allow for fluid to the tank 210 exit at a rapid rate. More preferably there are at least 12 outlets 210o, so that fluid can be withdrawn from the tank 210 at an equivalent rate to that required for hydraulic fracturing operations. Even more preferably the inlet, if present, has at least a 10″ diameter. Yet even more preferably, the tank 210 has a plurality of compartments 210c to allow separation of undesirables from the fluid prior to entry into the main compartment 211, such as a compartment to settle solids from the fluid and/or a compartment to skim light fluids (e.g. oils) from the fluid (e.g. water). With such compartments, the tank 210 may then also be used during flow back operations, when fluid returns from the wellbore after fracturing operations. Such fluid can then be directed into the tank 210, i.e. through compartments 210c, whereby it is treated to remove oils and/or settle solids and then such treated fluid can be reused for subsequent fracturing operations or directed back to a fluid handling and containment system 100 as shown in
Preferably, the tank 210 is made from steel and is of such dimensions so as to be as large as possible to be transported on the highway without the requirement of special permits. In a preferred embodiment, the tank 210 is dimensioned as: 14′ width×12′ height×55′ length with a resulting capacity of 200 m3 of fluid and having 16 outlets so that fluid can be withdrawn at an equivalent, or even greater, rate to that required for hydraulic fracturing operations (preferably at a rate of 3 m3 to 16 m3 per minute). As such, a single tank 210 can hold (or buffer) a volume of approximately three traditional 400 bbl tanks (each typically having a capacity of 63 m3).
More preferably, the outlets are each controlled via a valve 212. Even more preferably, the valve 212 is placed within or inside the tank 210 (so as to reduce likelihood of freezing when operating during colder temperatures) and is remotely actuated via a mechanical linkage that places operational control of the valve 212 outside the tanks 210 main interior volume (such as near to top edge of the tank). Yet even more preferably, the tank 210 further comprises an internal heat coil system 230 for fluid heating.
Advantageously, having a single tank 210 with a plurality of outlets 210o avoids the need for a hose and manifold system as required in conventional systems to tie various the 400 bbl tanks together, while still being able to allow fluid withdrawal at an equivalent (or greater) rate to that required for hydraulic fracturing operations. More advantageously, the 200 m3 capacity reduces heat loss usually incurred due to higher surface-area-to-volume ratio as compared to multiple 400 bbl tanks. Even more advantageously, having the valves 212 placed within the tank's 210 interior, reduces likelihood of winter freezing of such valves. Yet even more advantageously, having an internal heat coil system 230, even further reduces fluid and/or valve freezing during winter operations. Still even more advantageously, the use of a single tank 210 reduces transportation and set-up costs and time associated with the use of traditional 400 bbl tank farm.
Preferably, one of the embodiments of the fluid handling and containment system 100 of
More advantageously, a 200 m3 capacity tank 210 provides an operator several minutes to fix any problems encountered during fracturing operations, before having to making a final decision to stop fracturing operations. In this manner, tank 210 is used as “buffer tank” between main fluid containment (in system 100) and wellhead, but without the disadvantages associated with the tradition use of a number of 400 bbl tanks and the associated manifold(s) and hosing.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various modifications to the invention as described herein will be possible without falling outside the scope of the invention. In the claims, the word “comprising” is used in its inclusive sense and does not exclude other elements being present. The indefinite article “a” before a claim feature does not exclude more than one of the features being present.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2771477 | Mar 2013 | CA | national |
This application is a regular application of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/612,967 filed Mar. 19, 2012 and entitled, “FLUID HANDLING AND CONTAINMENT SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND METHOD”, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61612967 | Mar 2012 | US |