1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to liquid barriers and, more specifically, to a impermeable covering mountable on a structure, specifically for an aperture, such as door, window, vent, or other opening to prevent liquid passage through the aperture.
2. Description of the Prior Art
There are other barrier devices designed to prevent the ingress of fluids into a structure. While these barrier devices may be suitable for the purposes for which they where designed, they would not be as suitable for the purposes of the present invention as heretofore described.
It is thus desirable to provide an aperture barrier for a structure having a frame and gasket mountable over a structural aperture to provide a watertight seal between the frame and the structure and also to provide a rigid impermeable cover releasably mountable to the frame with a closed cell gasket between the liquid impermeable cover and the frame.
It is further desirable that the rigid impermeable cover be manufactured from a material selected from the group of wood, plastic and metal.
Many building envelopes are susceptible to water damage through their apertures, such as doors, windows, vents, or other openings whether at grade or below grade. Historically, these apertures were not designed with seals to prevent standing water from leaking around them, resulting in a situation that can quickly degrade catastrophically when standing water, even a few inches, containing flotsam driven by wind and current, compromises the existing aperture device.
The idea for this invention arose from reviewing the carnage of Superstorm Sandy on the beaches in NY. Flood damage to buildings was largely due to breaches of the building thru windows and doors that did not fail intrinsically but failed where they were structurally attached to the building. Glass breakage did account for some building flooding but in many cases the force of the water actually pushed doors and windows into the interior of the house without actually breaking the door, window or glass.
There are many generally accepted strategies for protecting apertures from storm water and wind damage. They include the use of plywood, sandbags, tape and other means that are applied to the door and window in the attempt to strengthen it against both wind and water.
Each of these strategies when deployed alone or in combination still have deficiencies that compromise their effectiveness. The use of plywood alone failed due to mechanical fasteners not being strong enough and the fact that the plywood did not form a water tight seal with the wall of the surrounding building—protecting the aperture from hydrostatic pressure. Sandbags alone also failed as they did not form a watertight seal and they were subject to flotsam that compromised their integrity and allowed erosion of the sandbag. Tape is commonly used to keep glass from shattering and offers little protection from water at all. Combinations of these strategies show promise but limitations in installation and deployment compromised their effectiveness resulting in significant loss.
It was clear that combinations of protection were needed to overcome the effects of moving water, standing water and debris that could be part of the moving flood waters.
Household protection is needed to combat these multiple problems and be easy and quick for the building operator to deploy.
Each of these issues is addressed by the fluid impermeable barrier of the present invention for a door, window, vent, or other type of opening.
The frame attached to the building wall allows a protective cover to evenly compress a gasket material to form a watertight seal. The cover itself protects the aperture and gasket from the dynamic forces of the water and the flotsam that might cause major damage.
Deployment of plywood, sandbags and other improvised protective measures takes time and is a drain on local building resources such as plywood. Additionally, these materials themselves may become flotsam in flood waters. Once the frame is attached to the building, deployment of the cover is a simple operation that is carried out quickly allowing the building operator to focus on other important issues in the face of the coming storm or flood.
The idea to position the cover by use of a channel allows for easy deployment and uniform transmission of the compressive force. Other methods to position the cover have been tried and are admissible for use with this device.
The cover is attached thru compressive force to ensure the gasket maintains its integrity. Several compressive attachments have been tried including bolts and nuts, rotating cams, toggles and other means to compress a gasket.
Numerous tests of the various components have been tried and are available for review. Frame and cover material, gasket material and compression devices have been examined. The preferred embodiments illustrated are the result of development of all these components that will allow the building operator to quickly and easily deploy this level of protection.
A primary object of the present invention is to provide a fluid impermeable barrier mountable over a structural aperture in whole or in part to prevent the passage of fluid through said structural aperture.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a fluid impermeable barrier mountable over a structural aperture designed to prevent passage of fluid and to prevent driven flotsam from breaching the fluid impermeable barrier.
Still yet another object of the present invention is to provide a fluid impermeable barrier having a frame mountable to the peripheral opening of a structural aperture.
An additional object of the present invention is to provide a fluid impermeable barrier wherein the frame may include security bars.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a fluid impermeable barrier having a gasket positioned between the structural aperture and the mountable frame.
A yet further object of the present invention is to provide a fluid impermeable barrier having a cover mountable to the frame.
A still yet further object of the present invention is to provide a fluid impermeable barrier wherein said cover is manufactured from a group of materials including wood, plastic and metal.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a fluid impermeable barrier having a compression fitting whereby the cover is securely held to the frame under pressure.
Additional objects of the present invention will appear as the description proceeds.
The present invention overcomes the shortcomings of the prior art by providing a barrier for building structural openings comprising a fluid impermeable frame that can be mounted onto the periphery of a structure's door, window, vent, or other opening to form a waterproof seal between the frame and the rim of the opening and a frame cover that is freely attachable and detachable and that can be compressively fastened to the frame opening to create a impermeable and secure barrier over the door, window, vent, or other opening.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages will appear from the description to follow. In the description reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which forms a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments will be described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. In the accompanying drawings, like reference characters designate the same or similar parts throughout the several views.
The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is best defined by the appended claims.
In order that the invention may be more fully understood, it will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawing in which:
Turning now descriptively to the drawings, in which similar reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views, the figures illustrate the use of the present invention. With regard to the reference numerals used, the following numbering is used throughout the various drawing figures.
The following discussion describes in detail one embodiment of the invention (and several variations of that embodiment). This discussion should not be construed, however, as limiting the invention to those particular embodiments, practitioners skilled in the art will recognize numerous other embodiments as well. For definition of the complete scope of the invention, the reader is directed to appended claims.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It should be understood that in all of the various configurations of the compression device 24 discussed above, the fitting receivers and corresponding engagement members could be placed either on the barrier frame 14 or the barrier cover 16 as desired, without departing from the spirit of the invention. The interengaging portions of the various compression device 24 could be mounted on the top edge or the side edges of the barrier frame 14 and/or the barrier frame cover 16 as is desired or convenient.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It will be understood that each of the elements described above, or two or more together may also find a useful application in other types of methods differing from the type described above.
While certain novel features of this invention have been shown and described and are pointed out in the annexed claims, it is not intended to be limited to the details above, since it will be understood that various omissions, modifications, substitutions and changes in the forms and details of the device illustrated and in its operation can be made by those skilled in the art without departing in any way from the spirit of the present invention.
Without further analysis, the foregoing will so fully reveal the gist of the present invention that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily adapt it for various applications without omitting features that, from the standpoint of prior art, fairly constitute essential characteristics of the generic or specific aspects of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2319525 | Waterman | May 1943 | A |
2599725 | Rust et al. | Jun 1952 | A |
3534992 | Swanson | Oct 1970 | A |
3861081 | Maskell | Jan 1975 | A |
4300794 | Dunsmoor | Nov 1981 | A |
4333271 | DePaolo et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4454691 | Mitchell | Jun 1984 | A |
4991349 | Barthelemy | Feb 1991 | A |
5347775 | Santos | Sep 1994 | A |
5430982 | Bane | Jul 1995 | A |
5487243 | Hale et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5603190 | Sanford | Feb 1997 | A |
5918430 | Rowland | Jul 1999 | A |
5941031 | Fullwood | Aug 1999 | A |
5943832 | Russell | Aug 1999 | A |
6125905 | Woodside et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6189264 | DiVeroli | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205713 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6257631 | Sokurenko et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6334282 | Wood | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341455 | Gunn | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6506112 | Halbleib et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6931802 | Jones et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7243463 | Lucero | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7337582 | Klotz | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7546710 | Abbott | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7797891 | Michaud | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8001735 | Fisher | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8272117 | Michaud | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8479462 | Sahadeo et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8613171 | Dudash | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010005995 | Subliskey | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020104275 | Harrison | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040060253 | Elsing | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20080148644 | Valente | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090266013 | Motosko et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110010997 | Kislov | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2458211 | Sep 2009 | GB |
2491019 | Nov 2012 | GB |
WO2012105911 | Aug 2012 | WO |